Showing posts with label Marc Elias. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marc Elias. Show all posts

Thursday, August 13, 2020

FEC Opinion On Stealin' Children, Land & Vote With Campaign Converted Children's Trust Funds

This is the FEC Opinion on converting congressional campaign funds into a children's trust fund.

See?

But, now, the fraud schemes have gotten much more sophisticated because there was much more money to be a-stealin' in the era of Faith Based Funding for Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare.

Thanks, Brian Svoboda, but you should have done that for Rashida.



You state that during the campaign Mr. Carrafiello became aware of a minor child who had lost his parents and who was being cared for by his grandparents. The candidate wishes to use his excess campaign funds to establish a trust fund for the child. You state that the child would be the sole beneficiary of the trust, and that the child's grandparents would act as trustees. The trust would be established by depositing the committee's excess campaign funds in a bank account. Your request states that "[i]t is my opinion that there is no relationship between Mr. Vincent Carrafiello and the proposed beneficiary or his relatives." You ask whether the establishment of such a trust is permissible.

#maytheheavenfall 
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, August 11, 2020

Prelude To Detroit: Soon To Be Presidential Candidate Kamala Harris Offers Up The Sacrificial Joe Biden




NOTE TO SELF: FIND OUT THE DNC PROCESS FOR REPLACING A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AFTER NOMINATION IN THE UNTIMELY EVENT OF A HUMAN SACRIFICE

Whoever would the DNC turn to for advice?

They shall ear each other alive.

I got popcorn.

#maytheheavensfall

Joe Biden taps Kamala Harris as running mate

 

Biden picks Sen. Kamala Harris as running mate
The pick fulfills the Democratic presidential contender’s promise to select a woman as his running mate, and puts to rest the sometimes bristly rivalry the pair shared during the early phase of the Democratic primary.

WASHINGTON - Joe Biden has finally announced his selection for his 2020 election running mate – Kamala Harris.

The pick fulfills the Democratic presidential contender’s promise to select a woman as his running mate, and puts to rest the sometimes bristly rivalry the pair shared during the early phase of the Democratic primary.

The rivalry provided one of the nomination race’s most memorable moments when Harris sharply criticized Biden for his record on racial justice, calling his positive description of a past working relationship with segregationist statesmen as “hurtful.”

Harris has since dialed back the attack, reportedly telling a colleague that the exchange was “just politics.”

Harris dropped out of the race for president in December 2019 and endorsed Biden in March 2020.

RELATED: Arizona, long considered a GOP stronghold, could be swing state in 2020 presidential election, experts say

Harris, who is also Indian American, joins Biden in the 2020 race at a moment of unprecedented national crisis. The coronavirus pandemic has claimed the lives of more than 150,000 people in the U.S., far more than the toll experienced in other countries. Business closures and disruptions resulting from the pandemic have caused an economic collapse. Unrest, meanwhile, has emerged across the country as Americans protest racism and police brutality.

She is the Democrats’ first female running mate since Walter Mondale selected Geraldine Ferraro in the 1984 presidential election. The last time a woman was picked as a vice-presidential candidate was 2008 when Republican John McCain tapped Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate.

Should Biden win the 2020 election, Harris would be the first woman to serve as vice president.

Biden taps Kamala Harris as his running mate
The former vice president made his announcement on Aug. 11.

Harris beat out a short list that reportedly included Stacey Abrams, Tammy Baldwin, Karen Bass, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Val Demings, Tammy Duckworth, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Susan Rice, Elizabeth Warren and Gretchen Whitmer.

With the country still in the throes of the coronavirus pandemic, Biden holds a significant lead over President Donald Trump in most major polls, including an eight-point lead in the most recent FOX News poll.

RELATED: Why choice of running mate matters more than usual this year

Biden also leads in battleground states like Michigan, Minnesota and Pennsylvania.

Harris, an Oakland native who graduated from Howard University and received her law degree from the University of California, cut her teeth in politics as California’s attorney general before being elected to the Senate in 2016.

Harris’ record as California attorney general and district attorney in San Francisco was heavily scrutinized during the Democratic primary and turned off some liberals and younger Black voters who saw her as out of step on issues of systemic racism in the legal system and police brutality. She tried to strike a balance on these issues, declaring herself a “progressive prosecutor” who backs law enforcement reforms.

As her national profile grew, Harris built a reputation around her work as a prosecutor. After being elected to the Senate in 2016, she quickly gained attention for her assertive questioning of Trump administration officials during congressional hearings. In one memorable moment last year, Harris tripped up Attorney General William Barr when she repeatedly pressed him on whether Trump or other White House officials pressured him to investigate certain people.

Harris has taken a tougher stand on policing since the killing of George Floyd. She co-sponsored legislation in June that would ban police from using chokeholds and no-knock warrants, set a national use-of-force standard and create a national police misconduct registry, among other things. It would also reform the qualified immunity system that shields officers from liability.

“We made progress, but clearly we are not at the place yet as a country where we need to be and California is no exception,” she told The Associated Press recently. But the national focus on racial injustice now shows “there’s no reason that we have to continue to wait.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, February 6, 2020

JUDICIARY: Citizens United Hearing - No One Wants To Talk About The Children's Trust Funds, Parental Rights Of Foreign Corporations Or FARA

So, Judiciary has a hearing on corporation PACs where they had Ted Deutch, of Ethics and Pramila Jayapal testify as witness experts on dark money, without calling out foreign corporations running Medicaid fraud into political campaign like Bob MAXIMUS GOODLATTECUS, former Judiciary Chairman did with TEVA, under Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

No one even mentioned how MAXIMUS GOODLATTECUS tried to pull a fast one and introduce legislation to gut the Ethics Committee that was investigating this matter, that Ted Deutch did not even mention.

This was about corporate parental rights, which seems to be a concept foreign to Judiciary, because no one wants to talk about the children's trust funds.

Perkins Coie's SEC Money Laundering Trust Fund Emolument Fraud Scheme

Yes, we all know the FEC does not have a quorum, but no one wants to talk about the U.S. Treasury having superseding powers of authority over political campaign finance.

One reason is because Perkins Coie Sucks, which basically runs the FEC, where Marc Elias is MIA when it comes to those pesky congressional subpoenas no one is enforcing.

This was a hot mess of a hearing!

#perkinscoiesucks


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, June 14, 2019

Meet Ellen Weintraub - The Perkins Coie Sucks Legal Genius Who Is Chair For The Federal Election Commission - Has One Seen Marc Elias? #perkinscoiesucks

Just when you think #perkinscoiesucks could not suck any more than it already sucks, I present to you, my dearies, just one more reason why #perkinscoiesucks.

Just in case you have forgotten how much #perkinscoiesucks, I thought I would kindly remind the entire living universe that #perkinscoiesucks with that fun link.

I should make a #perkinscoiesucks app just to pleasure those who are intrigued by my passion to vociferously share, with all of humanity the reasons why #perkinscoiesucks.

FEC Chair Who Scolded Trump For Saying He MIGHT Take Oppo Research From a Foreigner Used to Work For Deep State Law Firm Perkins Coie

Ellen Weintraud, Perkins Coie Sucks,
FEC Chair
Democrat Weintraub was appointed by George W. Bush during a recess appointment.
One more fun fact about Weintraub — she worked for the DNC-Hillary Clinton-Deep State law firm Perkins Coie prior to being elected to FEC chair.
Per the FEC:
Commissioner Weintraub took office on December 9, 2002, after receiving a recess appointment; she was renominated and confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on March 18, 2003. Commissioner Petersen was nominated and confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on June 24, 2008. 
Prior to her appointment to the Commission, Ms. Weintraub was Of Counsel to Perkins Coie LLP and a member of its Political Law Group. Before joining Perkins Coie, Ms. Weintraub was Counsel to the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct for the U.S. House of Representatives (the House Ethics Committee). Ms. Weintraub received her B.A., cum laude, from Yale College and her J.D. from Harvard Law School.
Is this why Weintraub said nothing when Hillary Clinton paid for a junk Russian dossier and hid the payments by funneling the money through her law firm PERKINS COIE, worked with Ukrainians to obtain dirt on Trump Campaign Manager Paul Manafort and reportedly had foreign intelligence agencies spy on the Trump campaign?

In October of 2017, the Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed an FEC complaint alleging the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign committee violated campaign finance law because they failed to disclose the purpose and recipient of payments for the phony Steele dossier.

Is this also why the FEC is ignoring Hillary Clinton’s $84 million campaign finance scandal?
“One year and two months. That’s how long it’s been since a formal complaint was filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), alleging Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign orchestrated an $84 million campaign finance scandal — the largest in U.S. history,” said attorney Dan Backer in February of this year.

“Yet the FEC has done nothing to hold the Clinton campaign, dozens of Democratic officials, and hundreds of six-figure Democratic mega-donors accountable for breaking the law,” Backer added.
Why is Ellen Weintraub still at the FEC?? She’s ignoring obvious crimes committed by Hillary Clinton and the DNC yet warned President Trump over a hypothetical scenario.
Read attorney Dan Backer’s entire report about Hillary Clinton’s money laundering scam and the formal complaint he filed with the FEC here.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, January 31, 2019

DOJ: OIG FBI Findings On Why Perkins Coie Sucks - Investigative Summary

Just one more reason why Perkins Coie Sucks.



Again, the moral of the story is, "Do not be mean to my Sweetie. Period."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, November 26, 2018

Cocktails & Popcorn: The Michigan 2018 General Election Certification Enters The Recount Phase - 11-28-2018 - Where Is Marc Elias?

Related image
"I am not a bully. I am the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed."
Recently on Cocktails & Popcorn, Adam Hollier magically made himself a Senator, while Rashida Tlaib refuses to say anything about the Detroit Land Bank Authority and Brenda Jones is on her way to D.C., even though she will not be sworn in because the Michigan 2018 Primary & General Elections have yet to be certified by the Wayne County Board of Canvassers or the Michigan Secretary of State Board of Canvassers.


See, it goes like this.

Brenda Jones asked House Ethics Committee if she had to resign from Detroit City Council.

House Ethics Committee said, "Nope", but did not go into detail, so I will.

See, House Speaker, cannot swear anyone in until the election is certified.

Since the election is not certified, she does not have to resign.

So, when she goes up to D.C. and does her own magical congressional stuff, she might just be arrested on the spot for impersonating an elected official, or something like that, because she cannot be sworn in, because the election is not certified, nor recorded.

How do I know the election is not recorded or certified?

Well, all you have to do is read the official notice of the Michigan Board of Canvassers announcing the November 28, 2018 deadline for Recount Petition Filing Deadlines, below, but let us examine the legal citation of the Notice:

MICHIGAN ELECTION LAW (EXCERPT)
Act 116 of 1954

168.879 Petition for recount; requirements; good-faith belief in winning; petition by state political party chairperson; recount and preservation of ballots; report; authority of legislature. 
Sec. 879.
(1) A candidate voted for at a primary or election for an office may petition for a recount of the votes if all of the following requirements are met: 
(a) The office is an office for which the votes are canvassed by the board of state canvassers under section 841 or is the office of Representative in Congress, state representative, or state senator for a district located wholly within 1 county. 
(b) The petition alleges that the candidate is aggrieved on account of fraud or mistake in the canvass of the votes by the inspectors of election or the returns made by the inspectors of election, or by a board of county canvassers or the board of state canvassers. The candidate must be able to allege a good-faith belief that but for fraud or mistake, the candidate would have had a reasonable chance of winning the election. The petition must contain specific allegations of wrongdoing only if evidence of that wrongdoing is available to the petitioner. If evidence of wrongdoing is not available, the petitioner is only required to allege fraud or a mistake in the petition without further specification. 
(c) Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, the petition for a recount is filed not later than 48 hours following the completion of the canvass of votes cast at an election. If the recount petition relates to a state senatorial or representative district located wholly within 1 county or to the district of a Representative in Congress located wholly within 1 county, the petition for a recount must be filed not later than 48 hours following the adjournment of the meeting of the board of state canvassers at which the certificate of determination for that office was recorded under section 841. However, for a special election for Representative in Congress, state senator, or state representative for a district located wholly within 1 county, the petition for recount must be filed not later than 48 hours after the certificate of determination is filed with the secretary of the board of state canvassers. 
(d) The petition is presented to and filed with the secretary of state. 
(e) The petition is written or printed and is signed and sworn to by the candidate. 
(f) The petition sets forth as nearly as possible the nature and character of the fraud or mistakes alleged and the counties, cities, or townships and the precincts in which they exist. 
(g) The petition specifies the counties, cities, townships, and precincts in which the recount is requested. 
(h) If the office is the office of state representative, a copy of the petition is filed with the clerk of the house of representatives. If the office is the office of state senator, a copy of the petition is filed with the secretary of the senate. 
(2) If a state senatorial race is determined by a vote differential of 500 votes or less or a state representative race is determined by a vote differential of 200 votes or less, the chairperson of a state political party may petition for a recount of the votes on behalf of a candidate in that race in the manner prescribed in subsection (1). Notwithstanding subsection (1)(b) and (f), the petition filed under this subsection need not allege fraud or mistake. Notwithstanding subsection (1)(e), the petition must be signed by the chairperson of the state political party filing the petition under this subsection. 
(3) The ballots in a precinct petitioned for recount in a legislative contest must be recounted for that office by the board of state canvassers and must be preserved until the contest is disposed of under the rules of the legislative body that takes office beginning in January following the contested general election. In legislative recounts of a special general election, ballots in a precinct petitioned for recount must be preserved until the contest is disposed of under the rules of the legislative body serving at the time the report in subsection (4) is filed. 
(4) Upon the completion of a recount for a legislative office, the board of state canvassers, in addition to the certification required by section 892, shall forward to the appropriate legislative body a report of the results of the recount. 
(5) This section does not limit the authority of the legislature under section 16 of article IV of the state constitution of 1963.

History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955 ;-- Am. 1973, Act 157, Imd. Eff. Dec. 6, 1973 ;-- Am. 1980, Act 61, Imd. Eff. Apr. 1, 1980 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 261, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 216, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 1999 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 128, Eff. Aug. 1, 2018 Popular Name: Election Code
According to MCL 168.879(1), it states, in part:
 A candidate voted for at a primary or election for an office may petition for a recount of the votes.
According to MCL 168.136, it states, in full:
If for any reason there is no candidate of a political party for the office of representative in congress, a blank space shall be provided on each of the official primary ballots that affords every elector of the political party an opportunity to vote for a candidate for that office by writing in the name of his or her selection.
So, I guess this means if someone wrote in the name of someone on the official Primary Ballot, that someone would be a candidate, and, as such, would be able to petition on fraud under MCL 168.879(1)(b).
(b) The petition alleges that the candidate is aggrieved on account of fraud or mistake in the canvass of the votes by the inspectors of election or the returns made by the inspectors of election, or by a board of county canvassers or the board of state canvassers. The candidate must be able to allege a good-faith belief that but for fraud or mistake, the candidate would have had a reasonable chance of winning the election. The petition must contain specific allegations of wrongdoing only if evidence of that wrongdoing is available to the petitioner. If evidence of wrongdoing is not available, the petitioner is only required to allege fraud or a mistake in the petition without further specification. 
Now, considering the fact that the 2018 Primary Election has not been certified by the Wayne County Board of Canvassers, having been deferred to Michigan Board of Canvassers, where there has yet been any certification or recording of the vote, where we still do not know who all the write-in candidates are, that would mean one of these write-in candidates have legal ground to file a petition for recount.

Unfortunately, a Primary Recount is going to be a tad bit difficult, unless the ballots are preserved, which would mean that the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security would have to execute its orders to preserve the integrity of voting rights to examine if there has been any ballot fraud, particularly absentee ballot fraud.

Then, the report goes through one last process pursuant to MCL 168.879(3):
(3) The ballots in a precinct petitioned for recount in a legislative contest must be recounted for that office by the board of state canvassers and must be preserved until the contest is disposed of under the rules of the legislative body that takes office beginning in January following the contested general election. In legislative recounts of a special general election, ballots in a precinct petitioned for recount must be preserved until the contest is disposed of under the rules of the legislative body serving at the time the report in subsection (4) is filed. 
Since we are also dealing with a Special Election, MCL 168.879(4) states that the report of the recount results would be forwarded to the appropriate legislative body, which may just be the U.S. House Judiciary, which would probably refer it to the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General, who would probably refer it to the Office of Special Counsel.
(4) Upon the completion of a recount for a legislative office, the board of state canvassers, in addition to the certification required by section 892, shall forward to the appropriate legislative body a report of the results of the recount. 
Of course, MCL 168.879(5) recognizes the powers of the Michigan Constitution:
(5) This section does not limit the authority of the legislature under section 16 of article IV of the state constitution of 1963.
Then again, Section 16 of Article IV of the Michigan Constitution identifies the legislators, including the Congress, as the final arbitrator of the integrity of the election through expulsion:
Sec. 16.
Each house, except as otherwise provided in this constitution, shall choose its own officers and determine the rules of its proceedings, but shall not adopt any rule that will prevent a majority of the members elected thereto and serving therein from discharging a committee from the further consideration of any measure. Each house shall be the sole judge of the qualifications, elections and returns of its members, and may, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all the members elected thereto and serving therein, expel a member. The reasons for such expulsion shall be entered in the journal, with the votes and names of the members voting upon the question. No member shall be expelled a second time for the same cause.

But hey, what do I know?

I know the recount petition filing deadline elapses 48 hours after the adjournment of the Board of State Canvassers meeting at which the results were certified as official, which was November 26, 2018, but I did not attend the meeting, so there is a possibility that the statute is tolling as of this posting.

I know if the Michigan 2018 General Election is not certified, let alone recorded and we should expect a petition, or Grand Jury indictments, or something like that because I wrote in my candidate for the 2018 Primary Election, which is still not certified or recorded.

I also know that these pseudo-elected candidates should know all this, considering that they really, really want to be public officials doing public official stuff like preserving voting rights by respecting the integrity through due process in elections, and not interfering in a federal investigation of fraud by way of public posturing, or clowning, as a more colorful descriptive, before being officially sworn in.

One woman, one vote.

Has anyone heard from Marc Elias lately?



I cannot wait to see how they recount an election that was so jacked up.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, November 18, 2018

Marc Elias Sucks In Florida, Michigan & D.C.

As this article has failed to identify the most illustrious legal engagements of Marc Elias, I have taken the time to do it.

Marc Elias Of Perkins Coie Sucks & So Does The FEC


6 Big Election Hits by Marc Elias, Democrats’ Recount King

Marc Elias has a history of turning Democrats who lost on election night into winners after recounts.

The lawyer representing Sen. Bill Nelson in the recount of Florida’s contest for Senate has been at the center of nearly every major election controversy for the past decade.

Elias is chairman of Perkins Coie’s Political Law Group, which was behind the opposition research document that fueled the Trump-Russia investigation. Before that, he was highly instrumental in getting Al Franken into the U.S. Senate.
Nelson, the incumbent Democrat, trails by less than half a percentage point behind Gov. Rick Scott, his Republican challenger. That’s close enough to trigger a recount in Florida, but the deficit of over 10,000 votes is more than than any previous recount has overcome.

Nevertheless, Elias has predicted victory, and he has a winning record at his back in high-profile races.


“I have a pretty good track record on that prediction elsewhere,” Elias told reporters on a conference call last week.

The results of the governor’s race to succeed Scott as Florida governor also qualified for a recount.
Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., leads Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum, a Democrat, by more than 30,000 votes statewide, though, so the DeSantis win is less likely to be overturned.

Elias, who isn’t involved in the DeSantis-Gillum contest, didn’t respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment for this report.

Both The Washington Post and CQ Roll Call referred to Elias as the “go-to” lawyer for Democrats. In addition to representing the presidential campaigns of Democrats Hillary Clinton in 2016 and John Kerry in 2004, Elias has represented the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Governors Association, and former Attorney General Eric Holder’s group, the National Democratic Redistricting Committee.

He also did work for the fundraising organizations Priorities USA, Senate Majority PAC, House Majority PAC, and the pro-choice EMILY’s List.

Here’s a look at high-profile political controversies where Elias played a central role.

1. Al Franken’s Senate Victory
In 2008, the U.S. Senate race in Minnesota between Sen. Norm Coleman, the Republican incumbent, and comedian Al Franken, his Democratic opponent, went into overtime with recounts.
Elias represented Franken’s campaign in the litigation surrounding the recount. His biography on the Perkins Coie website boasts that the Coleman-Franken race was “the largest recount and contest in American history.”

Almost 3 million votes were cast in the race.

Franken actually trailed Coleman by 725 votes after Election Day. The incumbent’s lead was slashed by little more than 200 votes after the first canvass.

However, after the recount, things began to change. It dragged on for six months before the final recount showed Franken squeaking by with 312 votes.

Upon Franken’s belated seating in the Senate in July 2009, The Wall Street Journal editorialized:
The unfortunate lesson is that you don’t need to win the vote on Election Day as long as your lawyers are creative enough to have enough new or disqualified ballots counted after the fact. …
Mr. Franken now goes to the Senate having effectively stolen an election.
Economist John Lott was studythat found at least 341 felons illegally voted in the Senate election, easily enough to have made the difference.

Most of those felon votes were cast in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St. Paul region, according to the study.

The group took the voting lists and matched them with conviction lists, then went to voting roster lists, where voters sign in before going to the voting booth, and matched the names by hand.
In their book about voter fraud, “Who’s Counting?,” journalist John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The  Heritage Foundation, explain the legal process in Minnesota:
So the Democratic strategy focused on how to conduct the recount so that votes could be added to Franken’s total. The Franken legal team swarmed the recount, aggressively demanding that votes that had been disqualified for failing to meet state legal requirements be added to his count, while others be denied to Coleman. The team’s goldmine was the thousands of absentee ballots the Franken team claimed had been mistakenly rejected. … 
According to Franken’s lead attorney, Marc Elias, scanners, laptops, and other mobile devices were used to record and keep track of every single disputed ballot in every county in Minnesota. Decisions made by local election boards on each ballot were immediately uploaded to a “cloud” database set up by the campaign so that Elias and his legal team knew exactly what vote totals were for each candidate across the state at every point in time. This gave them a tactical advantage over Coleman’s legal team by providing them with information on when to object or not object in individual ballot disputes.
2. Virginia Attorney General
In 2013, Democrats hoped to gain control of the Virginia attorney general’s office for the first time in two decades.

Elias represented Democrat Mark Herring in his razor-thin Virginia attorney general’s race against Republican Mark Obenshain.

On election night, Obenshain led Herring by 1,000 votes out of 2.2 million cast. However, a week later, local election boards produced results putting Herring ahead by 164 votes statewide. The state certified the results weeks later, on Nov. 25.

Obenshain initially asked for a recount, but conceded the race before the recount had ended.

3. The Steele Dossier
Elias was general counsel for Clinton’s 2016 campaign when his firm, Perkins Coie, retained the Washington-based company Fusion GPS to do opposition research.

That resulted in a document written by former British spy Christopher Steele that has become infamous. The unverified, dossier alleged that the Russians might have salacious, compromising information on Donald Trump.

The document also became the basis for the federal investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and Russian operatives to affect the outcome of the 2016 election.
Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly is set to issue a report before the end of the year on whether the Trump campaign colluded with Moscow or whether the president obstructed the investigation.

4. Jill Stein’s Recount
After Trump’s election victory, Elias got involved in a recount he likely didn’t have any hope of winning.

Although Clinton didn’t ask for a recount, Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein demanded recounts in the states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

In a post on Medium in late November 2016, Elias explained that the Clinton campaign wasn’t initiating a recount, but would assist the Stein campaign.

“Because we had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology, we had not planned to exercise this option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides,” Elias wrote, adding:
If Jill Stein follows through as she has promised and pursues recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan, we will take the same approach in those states as well. We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states—Michigan—well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount.
But regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represented in any court proceedings and represented on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself.
In the end, only Wisconsin had a statewide recount that saw Trump widen his lead over Clinton, by 131 votes.

5. North Carolina Standoff
On election night in 2016, state Attorney General Roy Cooper, a Democrat, ledRepublican incumbent Pat McCrory in the North Carolina governor’s race by fewer than 5,000 votes.
Elias represented Cooper in the recount process. In this case, he didn’t reverse fortunes for his client, as the Democratic challenger maintained his lead.

McCrory’s campaign filed complaints with the State Board of Elections alleging voter irregularities in 50 of North Carolina’s 100 counties.

However, the state Republican Party narrowed its focus to Durham County, with a request for recounting 90,000 ballots cast there. After the recount was complete, McCrory conceded defeat to Cooper.

6. The Other 2000 Recount
Elias wasn’t part of the famous 2000 Florida recount over who would win the presidency, Texas Gov. George W. Bush or Vice President Al Gore.

But Elias was on the team that represented Democrat Maria Cantwell in her defeat of Sen. Slade Gorton, a Republican, in Washington state.

Out of nearly 2.5 million votes case, Cantwell emerged the winner with 2,200 votes. A Libertarian candidate won 64,000 votes that year.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, November 12, 2018

Cocktails & Popcorn: Marc Elias Is Coming In For A Landing In Detroit, Right After Broward County Election Recount

Previously, on Cocktails & Popcorn, Florida Broward County had some issues with voter ballots and its clerk where the call was put out to remove the County Clerk from office, immediately, and put the office in federal receivership, exactly like they do in child abuse and neglect cases.

Something tells me the same thing is about to happen to Detroit, but, hey, what do I know?

Back to Florida.

FLORIDA’S RECOUNT BEGINS AMID ALLEGATIONS OFFICIALS TAMPERED WITH BALLOTS

Then, this happened.
Then, this happened.
Then, this happened.

It dawned on me that Marc Elias, "Legal Genius" (trademark pending) of Perkins Coie Sucks is about to deal with his own election interference Office of the Special Prosecutor indictment in Detroit, so I thought it best not to tell his tale, because that would just ruin another cocktails & popcorn moment.

Stay tuned and get more popcorn.

We are coming in for a landing in Detroit.



#perkinscoiesucks

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, November 9, 2018

What Do Wayne County & Broward County Have In Common?

Q: What do Wayne County, Michigan and Broward County, Florida have in common?

A: A County Election Commission DOJ Voting Rights Task Force investigation!

That is correct, the 2018 Primary Election Results for both states have yet to be certified.

FUN FACT! DETROIT CITY COUNCILWOMAN BRENDA JONES SAT ON THE CITY OF DETROIT ELECTIONS COMMITTEE FOR 2016 & 2018!

I wonder if Marc is going to have time in his busy schedule, shuttling between Detroit and D.C., to properly handle this Florida case.

Everywhere in Wayne County there seems to be an issue with these absentee ballots.



RUBIO WARNS: DEMS ARE ACTIVELY TRYING TO STEAL THE FLORIDA ELECTION


Florida’s Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes, head of Broward County’s election board, has repeatedly been accused of misconduct.

The Florida governor and Senate races could lie in her hands. A lawyer tied to the Democratic National Committee and Fusion GPS, the group behind the Steele dossier, has now gotten involved in a recount effort. Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said Democrats are trying to “change the results” of the election, and a liberal said Snipes belongs in prison.

Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio is warning that the fate of his state’s governorship could hang in the hands of Florida’s Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes, whom he’s called incompetent for violating state and federal laws. A liberal candidate similarly painted her as incompetent and corrupt.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum initially conceded the Florida race to Republican Ron DeSantis, but backtracked after vote totals changed Thursday, narrowing the gap to less than half a percent in both the gubernatorial and senatorial races.

Broward County is often the slowest of the state’s 67 counties to count votes, and its election department has repeatedly been faulted for wrongdoing.

Now, Perkins Coie lawyer Marc Elias has been enlisted in a recount effort. Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson is retaining Elias, who said it’s “not plausible” that, as Broward statistics suggest, 14,000 people voted in sometimes-obscure state-level races but left the Senate one blank. Republican Gov. Rick Scott, who, by initial appearances, beat Nelson in a race for Senate, said Elias will use aggressive techniques to “steal” the election.

Elias worked for both the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC during the 2016 election, even before the 2016 presidential candidate became the Democratic nominee, when the two were supposed to be independent. Perkins Coie also hired Fusion GPS during that election to investigate then-candidate Donald Trump, which ultimately resulted in an unverified dossier being sent to the FBI. “Democrat lawyers are descending on Florida,” Rubio tweeted Thursday. “They have been very clear they aren’t here to make sure every vote is counted. They are here to change the results of election; & Broward is where they plan to do it.”
“Bay County was hit by a Cat 4 Hurricane just 4 weeks ago, yet managed to count votes & submit timely results,” the Florida Republican continued. “Yet over 41 hours after polls closed Broward elections office is still counting votes?” Rubio also pointed out that Snipes “doesn’t know how many ballots are left to be counted” and that she isn’t regularly reporting results, which are “chipping away at GOP leads.”
A liberal college professor who ran for Congress challenging Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz from the left, Tim Canova, made similar statements. Wasserman Schultz resigned as head of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) after leaked emails showed party officials seeking to rig the 2016 presidential primary against Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, but she continues to represent the Broward area in the House.
A judge found in August that Snipes improperly handled mail-in ballots, and ordered her not to open mail-in ballots in secret after the Republican Party complained. Snipes’s defense rested on a claim that she didn’t know what the word “canvassing” meant, even though she is on the county’s Canvassing Board.

In May, a judge found that Snipes’s office broke the law by destroying ballots in the 2016 race between Wasserman Schultz and Canova. Canova told The Daily Caller News Foundation that in that case, “they claimed to not know the difference between a federal and state investigation. They claim to be incompetent, but my impression is it’s partly a ruse.”

Polling and early-voting results showed him performing well in 2016, then the reported results rapidly shifted to favor Wasserman Schultz, leading him to suspect manipulation. “So we put in a public records request to inspect some of the ballots, and if inspecting the paper ballot matched up, then it’s done, it will satisfy everyone,” Canova told TheDCNF. ” But the supervisor of elections stonewalled me for months.”

 “I was told they didn’t have scanned images, even though on election night they put the ballots through a scanner.

So we filed a discovery request to see the paper ballots,” he continued. “Three days later [Snipes] signed an order to destroy the ballots and certified that they were not the subject to ongoing litigation.”

“Her excuse was she just signed anything put in front of her and didn’t read it,” Canova said. “Then she said the ballots were put in the wrong place and that’s why they were destroyed. She concealed the destruction for two weeks.” Snipes’s position is an elected one, and she is a Democrat. Canova said even though Snipes admitted to destroying the ballots in a videotaped deposition, the government continued to fight the case. 

“They’re using taxpayer money while bleeding us dry.” Canova questioned why Scott and state Attorney General Pam Bondi, who’s also a Republican, didn’t pursue Snipes for criminal prosecution. He said she could face felony charges that carry five years in prison.

 “We’re dealing with organized crime. I just don’t trust anything that comes out of this office,” he said. He said Republicans had joined with him to try to defeat Wasserman Schultz, saying “I might not agree with Tim about Medicare for All, but this about integrity, this is about getting out corruption.”
Canova posted video of people putting bags of ballots into private vehicles, including a sports car.
Rubio also retweeted that a teacher said found a box of provisional ballots left behind at a school after Election Day.

Snipes did not return a request for comment. Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, October 7, 2018

Cocktails & Popcorn: #MeToo Psychoptic Solved! Perkins Coie Sucks Straight Out Of Detroit

Yes, Ladies & Gentlemen, the #MeToo Psychoptic has been solved. 

It came out of Hollywood, Relativity Media, to be more specific, from their bankruptcy cases.

We are dealing with "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) of Perkins Coie, which sucks, because they were behind the bankruptcies, which were skirted through the Judiciary Committee in more dog and pony show of hearings, because they were doing what they do best - stealin'...and it all started in Detroit.

Just ask Bob.


Below, is a clip from the original #MeToo show, Masterminds, which was pitched to the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) over there at Perkins Coie, who, attempted to cover up their hot messes, to eventually removing my Sweetie from the annals of history.

 

http://relativitymedia.com/

Having now watched the video, just replace the guns with law licenses.

Here is a bit of a background on Relativity Media and a few of their subsidiaries in stealin' intellectual properties, like copyrights and patents:

 Conyers Introduces “RESPECT Act” to Ensure Fairness for Music Legends & Motown Greats

Leading The Charge To Reclaim Copyrights
http://copyrightfraud.blogspot.com
I can recall some of these people, just laying by the pool, grabbing their androids and clicking away, filing fake LLCs then filing claims of copyrights to their new addresses.

For example, a Motown artist (not that I am using George Clinton as a reference) has an LLC in state A registered with the U.S. Copyright Office.

Some "Legal Genius" (trademark pending) has found out that, with good internet reception, he can use his android, while waking up drunk from the night before, to file a fake LLC in state B, using the same exact name, and transfer all the royalties from LLC in state A from the U.S. Copyright Office.

Then, by lunch and a few more cocktails, the "Legal Genius" (trademark pending) will have those copyrights, bundled, patented, and leveraged at least 35 times as a financial instrument for real estate investments, that can be wiped with a bankruptcy, to start all over again, by dinner.

That is how I found out what they were doing in the Detroit bankruptcy with the properties.

The Detroit Land Bank Authority was an easy set up to steal the taxes because it was set up through bribery, blackmail, campaign finance of really vile politicians who pushed through the Michigan Emergency Manager Law on the local, county, state, federal and international level to run the same intellectual property fraud scheme through patents.

Relativity Media to Be Acquired by Investor Group, File for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Again


Now, before you go off, sitting there grumbling under your breath that I am crazy (like a fox) I am going to take you on another fun ride through the SEC filings.

Robert L. Johnson has served as RLJ’s chairman of the board since November 2010. Mr. Johnson founded and has served as chairman of The RLJ Companies, an innovative business network that owns or holds interests in a diverse portfolio of companies in the banking, private equity, real estate, hospitality, professional sports, film production, gaming, and automobile dealership industries, since February 2003. Prior to forming The RLJ Companies, Mr. Johnson was founder and chief executive officer of Black Entertainment Television (BET), which was acquired by Viacom Inc. in 2001. He continued to serve as chief executive officer of BET until February 2006. In July 2007, Mr. Johnson was named by USA Today as one of the 25 most influential business leaders of the past 25 years. Mr. Johnson currently serves on the boards of directors of RLJ Lodging Trust, KB Homes, Lowe’s Companies, Inc., Rollover Systems, Inc. and Strayer Education, Inc. He previously served as a director of Hilton Hotels Corporation, US Airways Group, Inc., General Mills, Inc. and IMG Worldwide, Inc. RLJ believes that Mr. Johnson’s professional background, his prior senior leadership positions at various companies, and current and past board positions, make him well qualified as a member of the RLJ board.
H. Van Sinclair has served as RLJ’s president, chief executive officer and general counsel and as a member of the RLJ board since November 2010. Since February 2003, Mr. Sinclair has served as president and chief executive officer of The RLJ Companies. Mr. Sinclair also served as Vice President of Legal and Business Affairs for the RLJ Urban Lodging Funds, a private equity fund concentrating on limited and focused service hotels in the United States and for RLJ Development, RLJ Companies’ hotel and hospitality company, from January 2006 to May 2011. Prior to joining The RLJ Companies, Mr. Sinclair spent 28 years, from October 1978 to February 2003, with the law firm of Arent Fox, PLLC. Mr. Sinclair remains of counsel to Arent Fox. RLJ believes that Mr. Sinclair’s professional background, his prior senior leadership positions at various companies, and extensive legal experience, make him well qualified as a member of the RLJ board.
Lisa W. Pickrum has served as RLJ’s chief financial officer since December 2010. Ms. Pickrum has served as executive vice president and chief operating officer of The RLJ Companies since August 2004. Prior to that, Ms. Pickrum was a senior associate at Katalyst Venture Partners, a private equity firm, from September 2000 to January 2003. She has served as a member of the board of directors of DeVry, Inc., a provider of educational services (NYSE:DV) since November 2008 and a member of the Christopher & Banks board (NYSE:CBK) since 2011. Ms. Pickrum currently serves on the board of directors of Rollover Systems, Inc., and the RLJ McLarty Landers Automotive Group.
William S. Cohen has served as a director of RLJ since February 2011. He has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Cohen Group, a business consulting firm, since January 2001. Prior to founding The Cohen Group, Mr. Cohen served as the United States Secretary of Defense from January 1997 to 2001. He also served as a United States Senator from 1979 to 1997, and as a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1973 to 1979. Mr. Cohen has served on the board of directors of CBS Corporation since 2003. He has also served as a director of Viacom Inc. (2003 – 2006), American International Group, Inc. (2004 – 2006) and Head N.V. (2001 – 2007). RLJ believes that Mr. Cohen’s professional background, his prior senior leadership positions both at The Cohen Group and in politics, and current and past board positions, make him well qualified as a member of the RLJ board.


Now, I want you to go back in time with me to understand why so many of these people, heavily invested in Sinclair Publishing and BET, to name a few, would go through such lengths to create the #MeToo Psychoptic transposable model?

Sinclair Requires TV Stations to Air Segments That Tilt to the Right

I truly hope everyone understands that they were laundering money through political campaigns, children's trust funds, doing a bunch of other messy stuff those "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) like to do, like stealin' children, land and votes, right?

Can you say TARP?

It is all about the trust funds.

I am just going to go all the way out there and just say Perkins Coie Sucks because they were the law firm on the fake ass bankruptcy, just like the fake ass bankruptcy of Detroit from those fake ass mortgages, through fake ass businesses.


(See, I can create my own covert, counterintelligence #MeToo hastag.)

Ryan Kavanaugh likely made up sex harassment allegations against producer: judge

Hollywood producer Adam Fields on Tuesday was celebrating after nearly seeing his reputation ruined by #MeToo allegations.

Fields was ousted from Ryan Kavanaugh’s Relativity Media in 2016 and a year later stood accused by suddenly discovered files in the studio’s HR computers of sexual harassment.

But Fields, who was fighting his ouster in arbitration, was able to prove the allegation was totally made up.

An arbitration judge ruled that Kavanaugh likely created the bogus allegation — and awarded Fields every penny of the $8.44 million in back pay, according to arbitration papers filed in New York federal bankruptcy court on May 29.

“I’m happy to have my name and reputation restored,” Fields told The Post on Tuesday. “I can now go forward and do what I like best — producing movies.”

Fields, whose credits include “The Wedding Ringer,” “Limitless” and “Donnie Darko,” is expected to quickly recover from his seven months in exile — which is how long it took him to prove the ugly allegations wrong.

“The #MeToo movement has uncovered some really bad behavior that needs to be dealt with,” Fields said. “On the other hand, reckless journalism has also left irreparable casualties in its wake.”

Fields’ Relativity nightmare began in September 2016 when, on what he calls trumped-up allegations, he was fired for talking to the media — which violated his non-disclosure agreement.
Fields claims his “crime” was a seven-second elevator ride with a journalist.

Fields immediately filed for arbitration.

On the eve of an Oct. 31, 2017, trial on Fields’ claim, Relativity unexpectedly filed 2,000 pages of newly found documents.

It was in those documents that Relativity found a memo that “purportedly had been drafted by Relativity’s then Managing Director, Carol Genis, and which purported to document a pattern of egregious misconduct by Mr. Fields,” according to a bankruptcy court filing.

“In one instance a female employee detailed Mr. Fields (sic) suggestion that of his ability to increase their career path which she understood to be a sexual reference in exchange,” the memo read. “This employee directed me to 2 other female assistants whom she believed had experienced the same behavior.”

The alleged misconduct ultimately addressed unwanted sexual advances by Fields to “at least seven women (all unnamed),” according to the May 29 filing.

But in a stunning turn of events — one featuring a forensic audit of the computer generating the memo — arbitrator Judge Terry Friedman found the alleged peccadilloes presumably written up by Genis had been falsified by Kavanaugh.

This was after Genis testified at a one-day evidentiary hearing, accompanied by high-powered lawyer Patty Glaser, that she did not write or had ever even see the memo.

“The evidence was overwhelming and undeniable that Relativity falsified the Genis Memorandum,” Friedman concluded. “The [forensic] metadata refuted all of Relativity’s theories linking the Memorandum to Genis and establishes that it was last modified on Oct. 15, 2017 by ‘kav kav’, which must be Kavanaugh.”

Neither Relativity nor Kavanaugh could be reached for comment.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, August 20, 2018

Cocktails & Popcorn: Did Michael Cohen Forge Trump's Name For Some Money?

Image result for popcorn and taxis
"Enough fun treats for everyone
who sucks at Perkins Coie"

It looks like Michael Cohen was doing some of those Corporate Shape Shifter moves and it also looks like he was bribing certain individuals to approve loans for his taxi business that was tanking from Uber and Lyft dominating the markets.


Below, are the National Credit Union Administration charges with Melrose Credit Union that mentions forgery.

Whose name was Michael Cohen forging?

I am going to go out their on a limb...just grab some at straws...holding my breath...taking a shot in the dark and make a wild, random, guess that he was forging the name of Donald J. Trump, but hey, what do I know?

I know I would definitely try some Checker Cab milk chocolate caramel crunch popcorn with a tall black of coffee!

They like to forge and lie alot up in D.C.

That, I do know.

Ex-Trump lawyer Cohen faces $20M fraud probe

U.S. authorities investigating whether President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, committed bank and tax fraud are focusing on more than $20 million of loans obtained by taxi businesses owned by him and his family, the New York Times reported.

Federal investigators are also looking at whether Cohen violated campaign finance or other laws by helping arrange financial deals to secure the silence of women claiming they had affairs with Trump, the paper said, citing people familiar with the matter. The inquiry has entered the final stage and prosecutors were considering filing charges by the end of the month, the paper said, citing two of the people.

The total of the bank loans under scrutiny hasn’t been previously reported. The loans came from Sterling National Bank and the Melrose Credit Union, two financial institutions in the New York region that have catered to the taxi industry, the Times said. The paper cited business records and people with knowledge of the matter, including a banker who reviewed the transactions.

Federal investigators in New York are seeking to determine whether Cohen misrepresented the value of his assets to obtain the loans, the paper said.

Cohen and his lawyers declined to comment on the investigation, the Times said. Federal officials in New York and Washington also wouldn’t comment, it said.

Former Melrose CU CEO Says NCUA Charges Part of a 'Cover Up'

Alan Kaufman speaks with CU Times Wednesday and says he hopes to reveal the real story behind the allegations.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©