Showing posts with label Christopher Wray. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christopher Wray. Show all posts

Thursday, September 17, 2020

Prelude To Detroit: FBI Director Christopher Wray Testifies To U.S. House Committee On Homeland Security

Dear Chris ~

Stay strong, Baby,

Not much longer.

Much love,

The Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed.


This is an excellent thread on the hearing.

I strongly encourage you to take a gander.

#maytheheavensfall

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, August 10, 2020

Ron Johnson Asks Christopher Wray - "How Did The Mueller Investigation All Start?"

Ssssshhhhh!!!!

We are just now getting to the good part......

Now many of the same players that engineered a special counsel and impeachment against President Trump are brazenly teaming up again with a different target in mind: me. They are using the same tired old canard of Russian interference. You’d think they could come up with something better than that, but here they are, confident they can pull it off again. And with a compliant media, why wouldn’t they be confident? Ron Johnson P11. (letter is below)

Ron Johnson subpoenas documents from FBI director

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) has issued the first subpoena of his Senate probe into the origins of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation: to FBI Director Christopher Wray.
The subpoena, which POLITICO reviewed, demands documents but not testimony. Specifically, it asks for “all documents related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation” — the FBI’s counterintelligence probe into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. That probe scrutinized Americans close to then-candidate Trump for their links to Kremlin officials. Mueller took over the probe in May 2017.

It’s an unusual move, given that President Donald Trump appointed Wray to his post helming the FBI. In the two years since Wray took that role, he has positioned himself as a low-profile defender of the institution — often drawing ire from the president’s allies in conservative media and on Capitol Hill.
Johnson also released a lengthy letter, below, detailing the origins of his probe and criticizing the reaction it has garnered from media reports and Democrats. Democrats, Johnson wrote, “have initiated a coordinated disinformation campaign and effort to personally attack” himself and Finance Committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), whose office has worked with.
The letter specifically addresses a recent Washington Post op-ed from Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). In the op-ed, Blumenthal said Johnson’s investigation risked turning Congress into “a forum for debunked conspiracy theories peddled by Kremlin proxies.” Blumenthal cited a Post story reporting that a Ukrainian parliamentarian whose father worked in Russian intelligence said he’d sent materials to Johnson’s committee.
In his letter, Johnson reiterated that his committee has not received anything from that parliamentarian, Andriy Derkach. The U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a statement late last week saying that Derkach was participating in a Kremlin-backed effort to damage former vice president Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.

“It is neither me, Chairman Grassley, nor our committees that are being used to disseminate Russian disinformation,” Johnson wrote. “Instead, it is Democrats and the media that have been doing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s work for him. Puppet masters in the Kremlin could not be more pleased at the political division and discord that has been driven by the resistance movement against President Trump.”



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

Prelude To Detroit: Wray Says FBI Attrition Rate Is 0.4%

This is so sexy.

This is foreplay.

#maytheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

DOJ: Attorney General William P. Barr Announces Launch of Operation Relentless Pursuit - In Detroit

Bill Barr was in Detroit.

So was Christopher Wray.

Stealin' the children, land & votes is a violent crime because people died.


The Operation Will Surge Federal Law Enforcement Resources into Seven of America’s Most Violent Cities

Today, Attorney General William P. Barr announced the launch of Operation Relentless Pursuit, an initiative aimed at combating violent crime in seven of America’s most violent cities through a surge in federal resources.
Joined at a press conference in Detroit, Michigan, by Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Acting Director Regina Lombardo, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Acting Administrator Uttam Dhillon, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, and U.S. Marshals Service Director Donald W. Washington, Attorney General Barr pledged to intensify federal law enforcement resources into Albuquerque, Baltimore, Cleveland, Detroit, Kansas City, Memphis, and Milwaukee – seven American cities with violent crime levels several times the national average.
“Americans deserve to live in safety,” said Attorney General William P. Barr. “And while nationwide violent crime rates are down, many cities continue to see levels of extraordinary violence. Operation Relentless Pursuit seeks to ensure that no American city is excluded from the peace and security felt by the majority of Americans, while also supporting those who serve and protect in these communities with the resources, training, and equipment they need to stay safe.”
“The men and women of ATF are deeply committed to and focused on reducing crime gun violence in our communities,” said ATF Acting Director Regina Lombardo. “We are proud that our efforts have significantly contributed to the historic reductions in violence that our nation has realized in recent years. Operation Relentless Pursuit combines the resources of ATF, DEA, FBI, and U.S. Marshals to support our state and local law enforcement partners in those cities that – regrettably – continue to be plagued by rates of violent crime that are simply too high. Through Relentless Pursuit, we pledge to hold accountable the trigger-pullers, firearm traffickers, violent criminals and those who supply them the guns to terrorize our communities. ATF will aggressively utilize every available tool, including our crime gun enforcement teams, National Integrated Ballistic Information Network and firearms tracing to identify, investigate and support the prosecution of the most violent firearm offenders.”
“Drug traffickers – including cartels and street gangs – will stop at nothing to turn a profit, often using violence and intimidation to expand their reach,” said DEA Acting Administrator Uttam Dhillon. “This targeted surge of resources will further strengthen our ability to work with our federal, state, and local partners to pursue the worst offenders and make our communities safer.” 
“The FBI remains committed to providing our specialized expertise and resources to assist our federal, state and local partners fighting violent crime,” said FBI Director Christopher A. Wray. “We are here today to reaffirm our dedication to reducing violent crime in the cities selected for Operation Relentless Pursuit to combat the threats that arise from gangs and criminal enterprises that drive violence in the communities we are sworn to protect.”
“The U.S. Marshals Service is proud of the integral role we play in supporting Attorney General Barr’s strong leadership and commitment to combating violent crime and enhancing public safety throughout our nation,” said U.S. Marshals Service Director Donald W. Washington. “We will continue to work with our local, state, and federal partners to make communities safer by addressing violent crime at its core and taking the worst of the worst fugitives and other felons off the streets.”
The operation will involve increasing the number of federal law enforcement officers to the selected cities, as well as bulking up federal task forces through collaborative efforts with state and local law enforcement partners. The surge in federal agents will be complemented by a financial commitment of up to $71 million in federal grant funding that can be used to hire new officers, pay overtime and benefits, finance federally deputized task force officers, and provide mission-critical equipment and technology.  

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, August 13, 2019

DOJ: Attorney General William P. Barr Delivers Remarks at the Grand Lodge Fraternal Order of Police's 64th National Biennial Conference - " Epstein's co-conspirators should not rest easy"




New OrleansLA
 ~
Monday, August 12, 2019
Remarks as prepared for delivery
Good morning!  Thank you, Chuck [Canterbury], for your kind introduction.  Jim [Pasco], it’s great to see you and thanks for all that you have done for the FOP over the years. 
Congressman Scalise, it is good to see you this morning.  Thank you for your support for law enforcement.  We will never forget the heroism of the Capitol Police Officers that day and how their swift action prevented a mass tragedy.
Before I begin, I would like to briefly address the news from the Manhattan Correctional Center over the weekend regarding Jeffrey Epstein.  This case was very important to the Department.  It was important to the dedicated prosecutors and agents who investigated the case and were preparing it for trial.  Most importantly, this case was important to the victims who had the courage to come forward and deserved the opportunity to confront the accused in court.
I was appalled – indeed, the entire Department was – and frankly angry, to learn of the MCC’s failure to adequately secure this prisoner.  We are now learning of serious irregularities at this facility that are deeply concerning and that demand a thorough investigation.  The FBI and the Office of Inspector General are already doing just that.  We will get to the bottom of what happened at the MCC and we will hold people accountable for this failure.
Let me assure you that this case will continue on against anyone who was complicit with Epstein.  Any co-conspirators should not rest easy.  The victims deserve justice, and we will ensure they get it.
And now, let me turn to the reason I am here, to renew a relationship with old friends.  
It is a real privilege for me to join the Fraternal Order of Police this morning.  I enjoyed a close relationship with the FOP my first time around in this job, and I am looking forward to an even closer one this time.
Let me say I am proud to serve in an Administration and under President Trump who so strongly support law enforcement.
To my mind, there is no more noble profession than serving as a police officer. You put your own life and well-being on the line to protect your communities.
Your families spend anxious nights, so we can sleep in peace.  You never know what your day may bring — what uncertainty, danger, or threat you might face.  But you still get up, put on your uniform and badge, kiss your loved ones, and head out to face whatever risks might come your way. 
This calls for a special kind of bravery.  I remember that when our troops went off to war in the First Gulf War, they were cheered along the highways as they went. And when they returned in victory, they were cheered and given ticker tape parades – and rightly so.
But when police officers leave their precincts every morning, there are no crowds on the highway cheering you.  And when you come home at the end of the day after a job well done, there are no ticker tape parades.
One reason for this is that law enforcement is fighting a different type of war.  We are fighting an unrelenting, never-ending fight against criminal predators in our society.  While there are battles won and lost each day, there is never a final resolution – a final victory is never in sight.
It takes a very special kind of courage to wage this kind of fight – a special kind of commitment; a special kind of self-sacrifice.
So it is an honor for me to have been invited here, to be among you, and to have the opportunity, as Attorney General, to support you and salute you.
The horrors of El Paso and Dayton last week still weigh heavily on all of us.  We still mourn the victims of these evil acts.  We are also proud of the police who responded to the scenes and prevented further bloodshed.
It is particularly stirring to watch the footage from Dayton.  As the shooting started and civilians fled, you can see the police charging headlong towards the shooter, whom they quickly and skillfully neutralized.  Every American should thank God that we still have men and women like them – like you – who stand ready to run toward the mortal danger.
Let me assure you that the President will not let acts of mass shootings and domestic terrorism go unanswered.  He has been consulting widely and has directed me and Director Wray to work with our state and local partners, as well as the private sector, to develop strategies and measures to address these threats, including developing tools that can assist us in detecting potential mass shooters before they strike.  I anticipate that we will be sharing range of proposals – legislative as well as operational – in the near future.  I can assure you that our proposals will involve collaboration, with you – our colleagues at the state and local levels.
The recent atrocities also remind us of a basic truth.  Human beings are capable of great good, but also of the basest evil.  Even in a healthy society, violence, lawlessness, and predation lie just below the surface.  In the final analysis, what stands between chaos and carnage on the one hand, and the civilized and tranquil society we all yearn for, is the thin blue line of law enforcement.  You are the ones manning the ramparts – day in, and day out.
Even in the best of times, there is no tougher calling than serving as a police officer.  Today, it is much tougher than it has ever been.
The Framers believed that a free society can only exist if the people have the personal virtue and self-restraint to control their own worst passions and appetites.
If people lose the values and moral discipline to control themselves, then government would increasingly have to use external force to keep order, and the community would gradually lose its freedom.  This is what James Madison was talking about when he said, “We have staked our future on the ability of each of us to govern ourselves.”
We live in an age now when the institutions we have relied on to inculcate values and self-restraint have been under constant assault for over 50 years.  As a result, we see about us increased social pathology:  boys growing up without fathers; alienated and angry young men; gangs engaged in the most brutal violence; mass shootings; increasing mental illness and suicide among young people; a drug epidemic inflicting casualties beyond what we would sustain in a major war; growing domestic violence; an increase in sexual assaults and child exploitation.
You name it.  And who is expected to deal with this?  As other institutions fail and abdicate, who is expected to stand their ground?  Who is expected to pick up the pieces?  You are.  The police.  The thin blue line.
That is why I say that the job you are asked to do has never been more challenging.  The risks you are called on to take have never been greater.
Despite the fact that the majority of the American people do support the police, unfortunately, over the past few years, there has been an increasingly vocal minority that regularly attacks the police and advances a narrative that it is the police that are the bad guys rather than the criminals.  Whenever there is a confrontation involving the use of force by police, they automatically start screaming for the officers’ scalps, regardless of the facts.
I am not suggesting there are never abuses.  As with all human institutions there are sometimes bad apples; and we will deal with that.  But these are very much the exceptions, not the rule.  If anything, I continue to be amazed at the professionalism of our police officers in the most extreme circumstances.
The anti-police narrative is fanning disrespect for the law.  In recent years, we have witnessed increasing toleration of the notion that it is somehow okay to resist the police.  
Previously, it was well understood that, regardless of the circumstances, physical resistance is unacceptable because it necessarily leads to a spiral of escalating violence that endangers the safety of the officer, the suspect, and all in the vicinity.  For that reason, virtually all jurisdictions have made resistance a serious crime.
Not too long ago influential public voices — whether in the media or among community and civic leaders — stressed the need to comply with police commands, even if one thinks they are unjust.  “Comply first” and, if you think you have been wronged, “complain later.”
But we don’t hear this much anymore.  Instead, when an incident escalates due to a suspect’s violent resistance to police, that fact is usually ignored by the commentary.  The officer’s every action is dissected, but the suspect’s resistance, and the danger it posed, frequently goes without mention.
We need to get back to basics.  We need public voices, in the media and elsewhere, to underscore the need to “Comply first, and, if warranted, complain later.”  This will make everyone safe – the police, suspects, and the community at large.  And those who resist must be prosecuted for that crime.  We must have zero tolerance for resisting police.  This will save lives.
We are seeing disrespect for law enforcement in other ways.  We were all nauseated by the spectacle of prancing punks pelting New York police officers with water and plastic buckets.  Unfortunately, these were not isolated events.  From 2014 through 2017, there has been a 20 percent increase in assaults against police, up to about 60,000 per year.
This Administration will not tolerate violence against police, and we will do all we can to protect the safety of law enforcement officers.  I will share with you one proposal that we will be advancing after Labor Day.  We will be proposing legislation providing that in cases of mass murder, or in cases of murder of a law enforcement officer, there will be a timetable for judicial proceedings that will allow imposition of any death sentence without undue delay.  Punishment must be swift and certain.
There is another development that is demoralizing to law enforcement and dangerous to public safety.  That is the emergence in some of our large cities of District Attorneys that style themselves as “social justice” reformers, who spend their time undercutting the police, letting criminals off the hook, and refusing to enforce the law.
These anti-law enforcement DAs have tended to emerge in jurisdictions where the election is largely determined by the primary.  Frequently, these candidates ambush an incumbent DA in the primary with misleading campaigns and large infusions of money from outside groups.
Once in office, they have been announcing their refusal to enforce broad swathes of the criminal law.  Most disturbing is that some are refusing to prosecute cases of resisting police.  Some are refusing to prosecute various theft cases or drug cases, even where the suspect is involved in distribution.  And when they do deign to charge a criminal suspect, they are frequently seeking sentences that are pathetically lenient.  So these cities are headed back to the days of revolving door justice.  The results will be predictable. More crime; more victims.
One of my messages today is that the American people need to pay close attention to issues of public safety in their communities.  As a society we should not take our police officers for granted.
I would like to see the American people gain a renewed appreciation of the noble work done by our police officers in protecting our communities.  I would like to see increased recognition that being a police officer is the toughest job in the country, and it is getting tougher.  I would like to see a greater commitment to supporting the police.
The “thin blue line” is getting thinner.  The number of sworn officers per capita has been dropping.  We are now in a full employment economy.  With lucrative and safer jobs now available in other sectors, police departments must compete hard to attract the best candidates.
Many cities are already unable to fill their ranks, and vacancy rates are mounting. The harder we make the police officer’s job – the less they are supported – the harder it will be to attract qualified candidates.  And I think we can anticipate that those who come forward to serve will be increasingly attracted to jurisdictions where the community supports the police.
It is imperative that state and local jurisdictions not scrimp on investing in law enforcement.  At time when governments are trying to be all things to all people, it is important not to forget the basics.  The very reason we have government is to protect the public safety.  The very first duty of government is to provide the police.  If we are to maintain the professional police forces we currently have, we must ensure ample budgets to fund good compensation, full force levels, sufficient equipment and adequate training.
I would like to turn for a moment to my priorities and the importance of our partnership.
Two of my highest priorities are continuing the fight against violent crime and combating the opioid epidemic and the scourge of other dangerous drugs, like resurging methamphetimine.
When I last served as Attorney General in the early 90’s, violent crime was at all-time high levels in the country.  Starting in the 1960’s, we had gone through three decades of “reform” that turned our criminal justice system into a laughable revolving door.  Incarceration rates dropped precipitously; and crime rates tripled, reaching a high in 1991-92.
Starting with the Reagan Administration, and running though the Bush, Clinton, and Bush years, we strengthened our criminal justice systems at both the Federal and state level.  We focused on getting chronic violent offenders off the streets and into prisons to serve meaningful sentences that protected the community.  We worked closely with our State and local partners on programs like Weed & Seed and Triggerlock.
The result?  A steady and sharp drop in violent crime starting in 1992.  Today, violent crime has been cut in half. 
Unfortunately, in the last few years of the Obama Administration, the violent crime rate started rising again.  Days after his inauguration, President Trump issued an Executive Order with two clear directives.  First, he declared that this Administration would reduce crime in America.  Second, he directed the Department of Justice to take the lead on Federal actions to support law enforcement efforts nationwide and to collaborate with State, tribal, and local jurisdictions to restore public safety to all of our communities.
We take this responsibility seriously and, working closely with our State and local partners, we have succeeded once again in driving crime rates back down.  I am proud of our work together on Project Safe Neighborhood, and a variety of joint anti-gang and anti-gun crime efforts.
We have made a difference, but we cannot rest on our laurels.  Crime levels are still too high and we must keep up a full court press.  In the weeks ahead, we will be doubling down on our attack on violent crime.  We will be expanding our efforts against gun violence and violent gangs.  Once again, we plan on doing this shoulder-to-shoulder with our State and local partners.
On the drug front, we are facing a monumental challenge.  To be frank, the Obama Administration showed little interest in prosecuting the fight against dangerous drugs.  A tsunami built up and has been crashing over the country, bringing death and destruction.
The death toll from opioids alone is higher than we would sustain in a major war.  Indeed, in a single year, we lose more people to opioids than we lost during the entire Vietnam War.
Fortunately, this Administration has thrown down the gauntlet.  It declared a national emergency, marshalled the Nation’s resources, and is fighting back.
We have a robust program to attack the problem of over-prescription and diversion of legal opioids, and we are definitely having an impact.  Prescription rates are markedly down.  I am confident these successes will accelerate.
I think our attack on illicit opioids is building momentum.  It is going to be a long difficult road, but we are gaining real traction.
As you know, this Administration has sharply increased drug trafficking prosecutions, especially as to opioids.  In 2018 we prosecuted 36 percent more opioid-related offenses than we did in the previous year.  Fentanyl prosecutions were up 200 percent.
Fentanyl and other synthetics are especially deadly.  Unless we make progress on fentanyl, the gains we are making elsewhere can be overwhelmed.  A year ago, the Department launched Operation SOS, targeting synthetics in 10 high-impact districts.  The first year’s results are promising, and I plan to ratchet up this initiative.
Obviously, the head of the snake is outside the United States.  Most of the illegal drugs coming into the country – opioids, cocaine, and meth – are trafficked from Mexico by transnational organized crime, particularly the Mexican cartels.
We must destroy these cartels.  This is a uniquely Federal responsibility.  We have destroyed cartels in the past, but we let up so that other groups were able to take their place.  We cannot do that again.  I don’t underestimate how hard this work is, and how long it will take.
The successful prosecution of El Chapo was a big step forward.  We have to capitalize on that.  I have asked our agencies to use every tool at our Nation’s disposal to step up the attack on the cartels.  I am hoping that President Trump’s breakthrough agreement with Mexico on cooperating on the immigration crisis will give us an opportunity to work more closely in attacking the cartels.
In closing, I want to thank you again for all that you do.  Thank you for keeping us safe where we live and work.  Ever since the settlers in Boston established the night watch in 1635, America has had a proud tradition of professionals who stand guard against those who would do us harm.  You are the latest in that noble line.
Please continue to do what you do.  This Administration has your back.  May God bless you and keep you safe.  And may God bless the United States of America.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

SENATE JUDICIARYl: FBI Director Wray Testifies On Stealin' Children, Land & Votes - Without Details Because Mueller Has Yet To Testify

"It takes a special kind of person to get up everyday and put their life on the line for someone they do not know."
Christopher Wray
7-23-2019

From what I am gathering from this hearing is the question of whether or not the U.S. is ready for Russia to "up its game" on interfering in the 2020 election.

Well, you know I took this in a completely different direction.

Is the U.S. prepared to present its case with Russia to interfere in the 2020 election with legal action?

See, the DOJ has a long standing history of not taking any legal action during a political election cycle which is why the Democrats are fast-tracking their campaign because we are in Detroit.

But, what if another nation initiates legal action pertaining to the 2016 election interference by going back at lest 10 years?

No one is speaking upon the possibility of another nation initiating action.

I do not know why because the U.S. likes to do those Public Private Partnerships all the time, but hey, what do I know?

Wray is talking about taking it down to the local level because the people are not just putting their lives on the line, but also our public servants, like the FBI.





USA Freedom Act Section 215 is about to sunset.  It deals with accessing business records through FISC, unlike a National Security Letter.

CHILD WELFARE TRANSLATION:  YOU CANNOT MAKE UP STUFF TO GET AN EX-PARTE ORDER TO SNATCH A KID BECAUSE THERE MUST BE DUE PROCESS IN THE COURT, NOT AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION AND IF YOU LIE, THE FEDS CAN SNATCH YOUR BUSINESS DOCS TO CIRCUMVENT THAT "BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD" PRIVACY CRAP TO STOP YOU & HOLD YOU ACCOUNTABLE FOR TRAFFICKING TINY HUMANS, WHICH INTERFERES WITH ELECTIONS.

Durbin is asking about the FBI not taking seriously enough racial extremist attacks.

Wray states that the FBI does not investigate ideology and focuses on violence.

What was not raised in discussion on home grown domestic terrorism is propaganda.

Extremist conduct is inspired by foreign actors through PayPal, Patreon, and Youtube Superchat called *investigative-jounalists*.

For the right monthly subscription price, you can get just about anyone who is desperately trying to keep their lights and water on, to regurgitate just about any talking points you want.



It seems the FBI Tipline turned out to be a FBI "dump site".

Wray clarified the difference between a background investigation and a criminal investigation.

Human trafficking was questioned about the FBI progress.

Not one damn word on Foster Care & Adoption.

They are calling child trafficking "medival".

I identify child trafficking as what built this great, christian nation.



Wray drops some juicy tidbits on foreign NGOs taking over our graduate research in our universities, then stealin' the research through Public Private Partnerships which is funded through Social Impact Bonds with Medicaid from their Predicitive Modeling Crappy Programs in Child Welfare, by omitting this vast, new territory of modern day trafficking tiny humans, because Mueller has yet to testify.

Instead, he focuses on China snatching our intellectual resources from the universities, but did not mention Detroit Patent and Trademark Office, because Mueller has yet to testify.

Grassley wanted to know about whistleblower information on national security and election interference, and what the FBI did wrong.

I am going to answer this one.
The FBI was having some personal issues of disbelief because they were using Predictive Modeling Crap to do Behavioral Analysis on The Sacred Snitchers*, and, as such, spent too much time trying to rule out why The Sacred Snitchers were doing what they were doing, instead of looking at the stuff the Sacred Snitchers were screaming and crying about, for over a decade, but we are in Detroit, now, so everything is peachy keen.**
Corporate Shape Shifters was addressed along with campaign finance, but no one spoke upon propaganda.

Propaganda has no political affiliation, remember?

Booker question Black Extremism Ideology and NOBLE.

*The Sacred Snitchers cannot be identified because Mueller has yet to testify.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, June 26, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: Mueller Testifies To Judiciary - July 17, 2016 - Will Bob #sayhisname?

Be there or be in Detroit where we must definitely have a city wide summer BBQ for this show.



"I can't tell you my secret."

The 2020 Democratic National Convention is in Detroit July 30th & 31st.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, June 7, 2019

DOJ: AG William Barr and FBI Director Wray Speak at FBI Graduation | NowThis - Proclamation In Full Heraldry - #maytheheavensfall

Image result for junior fbiCheck this out. 

Full Heraldry. 

Listen to the prayer because it is a formal proclamation.

He speaks of the two worlds under ecclesiastical law. 

Check out the international flags. 

Pay attention to the message.

The graduation is the ceremony of granting the right to bear arms on behalf of the U.S. as a standing army.

The Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed is pleased, but make sure to check this child welfare program out, also.

You may wish to revisit the history of this program.

Junior Special Agents Program


#maytheheavensfall

(I had to make sure to drop the arms the seal of DOJ)


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: McQuade Got Frothy With Barr

Image result for sour sip of drink
"Sip sours slowly, as to not to make messes."
Oh my!

Barb is quite frothy.

We could easily solve all of this if Trump would just pull that IG report, which is obstructing justice in his back pocket.

#NeedMoreChaos

William Barr Delivers Chilling Message to FBI for Trump

A third probe into the origins of the Russia investigation, even to pacify the paranoid president, may cause real harm.

If you come at the king, you best not miss.

That’s the message Attorney General William Barr is sending to FBI agents, whether intentionally or not. Barr has authorized yet another investigation into the FBI’s conduct probing links between Russian election interference and the Trump campaign. Even though two other entities are already investigating the same matter, reports indicate that Barr has appointed Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham to investigate the origins of the Russia probe.

In doing so, Barr is playing into the hands of President Donald Trump, who has already characterized Durham’s assignment as an investigation into “how that whole hoax got started.”

The most charitable interpretation of Barr’s behavior in defense of Trump is that he believes strongly in a “unitary executive,” where the president can order any investigation he wants. But in his quest to protect the presidency, Barr is damaging our national security. His complicity in Trump’s efforts to disparage the FBI will make it more difficult for agents to do their jobs and could discourage investigations of those in power.

Certainly, the FBI, like any other government agency, should be subject to scrutiny. If you were to ask most FBI agents about internal investigations, they would tell you that they welcome such probes when done in good faith because they ensure not only accountability but also public trust.

Following the FBI’s aggressive surveillance of civil rights activists and war protesters in the 1960s and ’70s, safeguards and approval requirements were created to prevent such abuses. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was created to provide independent oversight of wiretaps conducted in the name of national security. The Domestic Investigations Operations Guide was created to provide detailed operational and approval requirements for each investigative step. FBI personnel are subject to DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, which investigates allegations of misconduct.

The FBI also has its own inspection division to conduct routine audits of compliance with polices and practices.

But the current outcry about the use of FISA surveillance and informants to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election is not sufficient predication for a criminal investigation. Those techniques are routinely and appropriately used in counterintelligence investigations against foreign adversaries. Former FBI general counsel James Baker has been speaking out about the FBI’s work on the Russia investigation, stating that the investigation was not a “coup” against President Trump, but instead was “about Russia. It was always about Russia. Full stop.” Failing to investigate Russian interference would have been a breach of the FBI’s duty.

Even use of the so-called Steele dossier in the FISA application for surveillance of Trump campaign adviser Carter Page is not the scandal that some describe. The dossier, compiled by a former British intelligence agent to be used as opposition research by Hillary Clinton’s campaign against Trump, was properly described as such in the FISA application, such that the FISA court had complete and accurate information when it authorized the surveillance. Judges, including those on the FISA court, are capable of discounting information based on potential biases as long as they are disclosed in the application, as they were here.

In addition, material from the Steele dossier provided only a portion of the facts included in the 66-page application that was used to establish probable cause to obtain surveillance authorization from the FISA court. Renewals of the application were approved from Trump-appointed Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. There is no evidence in the public record that the FBI abused the FISA process in this investigation.

Nonetheless, last year, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions asked DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to investigate potential abuses in the FISA process following complaints by Republican lawmakers. Sessions later asked Utah U.S. Attorney John Huber to pursue any criminal conduct relating to the same matter, along with other matters relating to Clinton.

It is unclear why Barr does not simply await those results rather than appoint a new prosecutor to undertake another investigation. If Barr had wanted to expand the scope of the prior investigations, he could have done so without appointing a new investigator. If he were simply replacing Huber with Durham, who, by all accounts is a highly respected and experienced investigator, then he should say so.

Instead, Barr has created the appearance that he is launching another investigation to appease Trump.

But there is a significant downside to such a tactic. Barr’s appointment of Durham advances the Trump narrative that the FBI is run by a “deep state” that is engaged in a witch hunt and a hoax.

Barr has already contributed to the partisan conspiracy theory with the language he used at his press conference to announce the release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report in April. Barr repeatedly used Trump’s talking point of “no collusion,” a term Mueller specifically said he was avoiding. Barr made things worse in his subsequent congressional testimony, when he used the word “spying” to describe the FBI’s tactics in the Russia probe. Despite his protestations that the word is not a pejorative term, and that “spying” is a word used by the media, it is not a word that government officials use to describe court-authorized surveillance.

Contrast Barr’s performances with the recent congressional testimony of FBI Director Christopher Wray. Wray rejected Barr’s use of the term “spying” as “not the term I would use.” Wray also stated that he did not have any evidence of any illegal surveillance into the Trump campaign. Trump responded by tweeting: “The FBI has no leadership . . . The Director is protecting the same gang . . . that tried to . . . overthrow the President through an illegal coup.”

Even after seeing this treatment, Barr continues to appease Trump, who campaigns on the narrative that he is victim of the deep state. Trump has called the FBI “a disgrace” that is “in tatters.” Harming the reputation of the FBI will make it more difficult for the FBI do the important work it does every day. When an agent knocks on a door for tips in a kidnaping case, will the resident help someone from an agency the president has warned him about? When an FBI agent testifies at the trial of a sex trafficker, will a juror trust that he is telling the truth? By disparaging the FBI, the president makes our country less safe. Barr is compounding the problem by contributing to this false narrative.

In addition to harming the effectiveness of the FBI, Barr’s complicity in Trump’s tactics may also have a chilling effect. By advancing the “investigate the investigators” mantra, Barr may cause the FBI to flinch next time it perceives a threat from powerful people within the government. He is incentivizing the FBI to sit idly by in the face of national security threats. The risk is that under Barr’s leadership, the FBI’s new motto might become “he who does nothing does nothing wrong.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, May 10, 2019

2018 FBI Director’s Community Leadership Awards

Do not forget to download the app!


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, May 9, 2019

DOJ Honors Rosenstein With A Farewell Ceremony Before Nuremberg

With full heraldry of the United States, the Department of Justice beared arms to honor Rod Rosenstein.

I believe we can revise that U.S. Attorney Guidance on human trafficking.

Like I always say, a gal can dream and sometimes those dreams come true.


Nuremberg Trial, International Military Tribunal, 1945-1946

The heavens begin to fall.

Yes, Jeff got a ballad, Rod got a memo.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, May 7, 2019

FBI: Wray Testifies While Watching Senate Appropriations Committee

FBI Director Christopher Wray appears before the Senate Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies to testify on proposed budget estimates and justification for the fiscal year 2020 for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.


The Nassar - MSU investigation is under Inspector General and is ongoing?

Oooooooo........

There is an ongoing Inspector General investigation with the 2016 election?

Ooooooooo......

The Dude behind the left of Wray with the earpiece has yet to blink.

Image may contain: 2 people

What a great psyoptic to watch later because I bet she got the money shot!

Boo! 

We watch you.



Opioid crisis

https://www.dea.gov/press-releases/2017/09/28/fbi-and-dea-educating-community-documentary-film-addressing

Stay away from the DarkNet

https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/hate-crimes

Ongoing investigation

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/cesar-sayoc-pleads-guilty-65-felonies-mailing-16-improvised-explosive-devices-connection

Give FBI more money so they can spend more time partnering in the community, listening to the original sources and get new tech stuff and pass out swag.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-sessions-announces-creation-national-public-safety-partnership-combat

FBI needs help fighting predictive modeling crappers.

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/international/the-committee-on-foreign-investment-in-the-united-states-cfius

Foreign influence concerns of the 2020 election

https://www.justice.gov/crt/combating-religious-discrimination-and-protecting-religious-freedom-12

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Happy 110th Anniversary FBI

FBI, This Week: 110 Years of Fidelity, Bravery, and Integrity







July 26, 2018

Mollie Halpern: As the FBI celebrates its 110th anniversary, it rededicates itself to its mission to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution.
The FBI story began in 1908 with only 34 special agents and two field offices.
Over the past 11 decades, the FBI has evolved into an investigative and intelligence-driven American institution with nearly 37,000 employees and 56 field offices guided by its motto of Fidelity, Bravery, and Integrity.
FBI Historian Dr. John Fox …
John Fox: From the beginning, we have been entrusted with a lot of responsibility because of our role in protecting the security of our fellow citizens while upholding their rights and liberties under the Constitution. Overall, we have done that very well, and our reputation has shown that throughout our history. Where we have fallen down, we have quickly responded and changed and adapted to the lessons we've learned.
Halpern: During this milestone, the FBI extends its gratitude to its partners, employees—including those who have sacrificed their lives for our country—and the American public for its support and trust in our work.
Learn more about the FBI’s rich history at www.fbi.gov. With FBI, This Week, I’m Mollie Halpern of the Bureau.
I posted this as proof of my online suppression.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, June 28, 2018

DOJ & JUDICIARY: Statement of Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein Before the House Judiciary Committee Washington, DC


If the FBI turns over the FISA surveillance documents to the Judiciary Committee, the Judiciary Committee might find out that the FBI was spying on the Judiciary Committee.

J'ai dit une bêtise, oups!!!


Remarks as prepared for delivery
Chairman Goodlatte, Ranking Member Nadler, and members of the Committee, I always welcome the opportunity to appear before this distinguished committee, but this is not a happy occasion.

Federal Bureau of Investigation employees deviated from important principles in 2016 and 2017. Everyone knew about some of the departures when they occurred – such as discussing criminal investigations and encroaching on prosecutorial decisions. We learned about others through an internal investigation – such as leaking to the news media and exhibiting political bias.

We need to correct errors, hold wrongdoers accountable, and deter future violations. Director Wray will describe what the FBI is doing to accomplish those goals. At the Department of Justice, our mandatory annual training will include lessons from the Inspector General’s report, and we are considering other recommendations.

We already revised the Department’s confidentiality policies to emphasize that “non-public, sensitive information obtained in connection with [our] work is protected from disclosure.” We intend to enforce that principle for our employees, and we need to demonstrate respect for it ourselves by protecting sensitive information entrusted to the FBI.

Congressional oversight is vital to democracy. My June 27 letter, which I will submit for your consideration, explains how the executive branch handles congressional oversight requests for law enforcement and intelligence information. The FBI is managing an extraordinary volume of congressional oversight requests, some of which seek details about criminal investigations and intelligence sources. As a result of President Trump’s commitment to transparency, the FBI is making unprecedented disclosures to the Congress, including granting access to hundreds of thousands of pages of investigative information, and thousands of pages of classified documents.

As with most things in Washington, the real work is not done on television, and it is not all done by me. Trump Administration officials are meeting and talking with Committee staff every day and working overtime with teams of FBI employees to accommodate requests and produce relevant information.

This Committee requested the production of all documents relevant to the Inspector General’s review. As you well know, the FBI normally declines such requests. Because of the circumstances of this case, and concerns we developed during the investigation, the Department agreed to produce all relevant FBI documents. I understand that the universe of potentially relevant documents was in the range of 1.2 million, although only a fraction are actually relevant.

We began the production even before the Inspector General finished his report, after we confirmed that the investigation was substantially complete and production would not interfere with it.

The FBI struggled for some time with the scope and volume of the production. Some of your colleagues brought to my attention that the FBI’s redaction policies created the appearance that relevant information was being concealed.

I looked into the issue and understood their concerns. As a result, I called on U.S. Attorney John Lausch from Chicago to take charge of the project. Mr. Lausch brings experience in handling large document productions in the private sector. He worked with Committee members and staff and arranged a production process that seems to be working very well. I understand that some people still state concerns about the speed of the production, but those concerns are mistaken.

Most requests have been fulfilled, and other document productions are in progress.

I have devoted almost thirty years to the service of my country. In my line of work, we keep an open mind and complete investigations before we allege wrongdoing by anyone. Our allegations are made under oath and supported by credible evidence, and we treat everyone with respect and deal with one another in good faith.

You and I are the beneficiaries and the temporary trustees of a remarkable experiment in constitutional self-government. Like each member of Congress, the Deputy Attorney General and other Department officials represent the people of the United States.

President Trump appointed us, the Senate confirmed our nominations, and we swore an oath when we accepted the responsibility to help lead the Department of Justice.

The oath requires us to make controversial decisions.

So here is the advice that I give Department of Justice employees: Faithfully pursue the Department’s law enforcement mission and the Administration’s goals in a manner consistent with laws, regulations, policies, and principles. Be prepared to face criticism. That is part of the job. But ignore the tyranny of the news cycle. Stick to the rule of law, and make honest decisions that will withstand fair and objective review.

Our Department’s 115,000 employees work diligently every day to keep America safe. Most of their good work is never the subject of any congressional inquiry.

It is a tremendous privilege to work in an organization that seeks the truth and serves the law.

But the Department of Justice is not perfect. We will keep working to make it better, and we welcome your constructive assistance.

Thank you.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

JUDICIARY: Ranking Member Nadler Statement for the Hearing with Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein & FBI Director Wray




Washington, D.C. – Today, Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, delivered the following opening remarks during a Judiciary Committee hearing with the Department of Justice (DOJ) Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Christopher Wray on “oversight of FBI and DOJ actions surrounding the 2016 election.”

“Mr. Chairman, the events that have led up to this hearing are totally unacceptable. 

“On Monday of this week, you notified us of this hearing without the seven-day notice required by the rules.

“On Tuesday, you started our Committee markup more than an hour late, without notice to the Minority.  Then you allowed Mr. Jordan to offer an amendment to a resolution of inquiry that was patently non-germane—and then you stood out of view of the cameras, in the hallway just off the hearing room, while the Majority voted to overturn the ruling of their own Chair that the amendment was not germane.

“On Wednesday, you dropped all Committee business to interview Peter Strzok, who had already volunteered to come in for an interview before you threatened him with a subpoena.

“Today, we meet so that the Majority can criticize the Deputy Attorney General to his face, largely about documents that you know he cannot produce.  We will take a break so that we can go to the floor and vote on a so-called “resolution of insistence” based on the Jordan amendment from earlier this week—a measure that is without precedent, without the force of law, and clearly a pretext for a move against Mr. Rosenstein that the Majority already has planned. 

“And what is the great emergency that justifies this last-minute hearing?  Why has the Majority abandoned the rules and traditions that govern civility in the House?  The tired story of Hillary Clinton’s emails, of course, plus a few conspiracy theories about the Special Counsel. 

“When President Trump and his Administration were actively separating families at the border—ripping children out of the arms of their parents, and causing untold suffering to thousands of families—that did not merit an emergency hearing.

“And now that thousands of children are still separated from their parents, with no clear plan from this Administration for reuniting these families, where is the emergency hearing on that issue?

“We know that Russia, after successfully interfering with the 2016 elections, is actively working to disrupt the upcoming elections as well.  The former National Security Advisor testified that our intelligence agencies have received no instructions from the White House to protect the integrity of our election system.  Have we scheduled an emergency hearing on that issue?

“For that matter, have we conducted any oversight at all on election security; on the family separation crisis; on the Administration’s failure to protect Dreamers; on the Justice Department’s radical decision not to defend the Affordable Care Act; on the Supreme Court’s recent decisions to undermine voting rights and workers’ rights; on the President’s ongoing conflicts of interest and violations of the Emoluments Clause; or on the myriad other pressing issues within our Committee’s jurisdiction?  No, as with so many issues, this Committee has stayed silent.

“But on Hillary Clinton’s emails?  Sound the alarms.

“Despite an Inspector General’s report that, in more than 500 exhaustive pages, demonstrates conclusively that the outcome of the Clinton investigation was not affected by any improper bias, political or otherwise, we are wasting precious Committee time to chase Hillary Clinton.

“The Republicans seems desperate to prove that there was some sort of pro-Clinton and anti-Trump conspiracy within the FBI when, in fact, the overwhelming evidence shows exactly the opposite.  Virtually every action criticized in the Inspector General’s report—Director Comey’s July announcement, his disparate treatment of the Clinton and Trump investigations, and his October decision to announce the discovery of additional emails—ultimately harmed the candidacy of Secretary Clinton, and inured to the benefit of Donald Trump.

“But I guess we shouldn’t let facts stand in the way of a good manufactured emergency.

“According to the Republican memo for today’s hearing, today is also an opportunity for Members to consider “the Justice Department’s compliance with the committee’s March 22 subpoena,” a subpoena that was not issued in compliance with House Rules and, therefore, cannot be enforced.

“Even if it were a properly issued subpoena, the fight over document production seems to have boiled down to certain documents that the Republicans know the Department of Justice cannot turn over—much of it evidence related to an ongoing criminal investigation, the scoping documents outlining specific lines of inquiry in an ongoing criminal investigation, and the identities of confidential human sources still working undercover in the field.

“And that, of course, is the whole point.  As part of their coordinated and determined effort to undermine the Special Counsel’s investigation, Republicans are requesting documents they know they cannot have. 

“If they somehow find themselves in possession of sensitive documents that go to the core of the Special Counsel’s investigation, and if past practice holds, those documents will end up in the possession of the subject of the investigation—namely, President Trump.

“And if the Majority is rightly denied, they will do their best to undermine the credibility of the Department of Justice, the credibility of the Deputy Attorney General—and, by extension, the credibility of the Special Counsel. 

“They will likely try to hold Mr. Rosenstein in contempt.  Some have even threatened him with impeachment.  They may argue that he must be removed his oversight role over the Special Counsel’s investigation.

“This is an investigation, I might remind my Republican colleagues, that has already yielded five guilty pleas, and that has led to the indictment of 20 people so far.  The President and some of his closest advisors are under investigation for having participated in a criminal conspiracy with a foreign power against the United States.

“That is an emergency.

“The President practically confessed to Lester Holt on television that he obstructed the investigation into that conspiracy when he said that he fired former FBI Director Comey because of “this Russia stuff, with Trump and Russia.”

“That is an emergency.

“But is that the subject of today’s emergency hearing?  No.  Or of any emergency hearing?  No it is not.

“I know that this has been a hard week for the Majority.  I know that it must be tempting to change the subject and rally the base with cries of “lock her up!” 

“But we do not have the luxury of hiding or voting present at this critical juncture in our democracy. 

“We cannot hide from our responsibilities. We cannot hide from our obligation to conduct oversight of a corrupt Administration.  We cannot hide from our constitutional duty to protect our elections from foreign interference, or to stand up for the rules, and for our democratic institutions, and for the rule of law.

“I ask my colleagues to consider this question as we proceed:  when the Special Counsel’s work is complete, when the enormity of what he finds has been laid bare, how will the American people judge your actions today? 

“I yield back the balance of my time.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

JUDICIARY: Rosenstein and Wray to Testify Before the House Judiciary Committee


Washington, D.C. – On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 1:00 p.m., the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on “Oversight of FBI and DOJ Actions Surrounding the 2016 Election.” At the hearing, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray will testify before the Committee regarding the findings contained in the Justice Department Inspector General’s report about various actions taken by the Justice Department and FBI in 2016, as well as regarding the Committee’s oversight investigation into these matters.

In October 2017, the House Judiciary Committee and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee announced a joint investigation into decisions made by the Department of Justice in 2016 and 2017. To date, the Committees have interviewed several key witnesses and reviewed thousands of documents. Recently, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) called on Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and Director Wray to testify before Congress following the release of the Inspector General’s report.

Media Guidance: The hearing will take place in 2141 Rayburn House Office Building and will be webcast live at judiciary.house.gov. Media will be allowed access to the hearing room at 12:15 p.m.
Congressionally-credentialed members of the media MUST RSVP to their respective Press Gallery no later than 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 27. Due to anticipated interest, attendance will be limited to one media representative from each outlet. We will try to accommodate additional representatives if space is available. Gallery contact information is below:

House Radio/TV Gallery:radiotv@mail.house.gov
202-225-5214
House Periodical Gallery:periodical.press@mail.house.gov
202-225-2941
House Daily Press Gallery:dailypressgallery@mail.house.gov
202-225-3945
Photographer Gallery:press_photo@saa.senate.gov
202-224-6548

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©