Showing posts with label James Comey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Comey. Show all posts

Thursday, September 10, 2020

Prelude To Detroit: Who Is This Masked Man Who Was Orchestrating Angry Bob With His Ham Sandwiches?

Who was this masked man who was orchestrating Angry Bob with his Ham Sandwiches?


#maytheheavensfall

It’s clear Robert Mueller was in no condition to run his investigation — so who did?

To the liberal media, special counsel Robert Mueller was the sharp, seasoned, no-nonsense prosecutor who would get to the bottom of “collusion.” But when Mueller testified before Congress on July 24, 2019, many were stunned to see a man struggling to answer basic questions.

Had his cognitive abilities declined during the probe?

The 76-year-old Mueller, members of President Trump’s defense team recalled, appeared to be a figurehead investigator, a man who seldom spoke or was even seen. On those rare occasions Trump’s lawyers had a chance to talk to the special counsel, Mueller’s aides appeared to be covering for his lapses in memory. So who was really in charge of the Mueller probe?

There were questions about Mueller’s mental condition even before he was appointed special counsel in May 2017. Chris Swecker spent 24 years in the FBI. He left the agency in 2006 with the highest respect for his old boss, with whom he had extensive daily contact for more than two years. “Mueller was super sharp,” Swecker remembered.

In fall 2016, working in North Carolina, Swecker invited Mueller to speak at a conference. Mueller flew from Washington, and Swecker met him for breakfast to brief him on the event. He noticed something he had never seen in his old boss. “I remember telling my wife after the breakfast that he’s slipping,” Swecker recalled. “You could tell the acuity was not there. . . . He was a little confused about what to do after he got off.” When Mueller was made special counsel the next year, Swecker wondered whether he was up to it.

Communications aide Mark Corallo was a Mueller fan even as he worked for the Trump defense team. After his departure in July 2017, Corallo awaited a call — not from his old colleagues, but from Mueller. Prosecutors wanted to question him about Trump’s role in drafting a statement in response to New York Times reporting on the now-infamous Trump Tower meeting.

The session with Mueller’s lawyers took place on Feb. 15, 2018. “At the end of the interview, Mueller came in and shook my hand and put his hand around my shoulder and said, ‘It’s good to see you,’ ” Corallo recalled. “He said, ‘I’m sorry you got dragged into this.’ When he left the room, I said to Andrew Goldstein, ‘Hey, how’s he doing?’ They said great. I said, ‘Well, he looks a little gaunt. Is he eating? Is he tired?’ They said, ‘No, he’s running circles around us.’ This was the first time I noticed that he was not physically robust.”

Nearly a year and a half later, watching Mueller testify on television, Corallo was taken aback. “When I saw him testifying, it was significantly more apparent,” he recalled. “And trust me, I was not the only one. Those of us who worked with Bob at the Justice Department after 9/11 and watched his testimony — the phone calls were flying. ‘Holy crap, what’s wrong with Bob? Is he sick?’ ”

In another key meeting, according to members of the Trump defense team, the special counsel seemed unfamiliar with a key Justice Department policy having to do with indicting a sitting president. “After that, we never met with Mueller, and we never spoke with him on the phone,” Trump defense lawyer Jane Raskin recalled.

Robert Mueller memo shows why each key figure was targeted in probe
“What’s galling to me in hindsight, knowing what we know, is that they dragged it out as long as they did,” said Corallo, the Trump comms man. “Which says to me that people other than Bob Mueller were running that investigation.”

But who? Speculation focused on Andrew Weissmann, the aggressive prosecutor sometimes known as Mueller’s “pit bull.” But the inner workings of the Mueller investigation were never fully clear to those outside. All the president’s lawyers could see was that Mueller didn’t seem to be in control.

“Bob at the end was AWOL,” Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow recalled. “That was the great con. He showed up for cameo appearances. He was the Wizard of Oz. He was back behind the big curtain, pulling some strings here and there, but when you pulled the curtain away, he wasn’t even really the one pulling the strings.”

When Mueller testified, everyone could see what Team Trump had seen. It wasn’t pretty. And it ended Democratic hopes of turning the Russia probe into a glorious victory.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, September 3, 2020

Prelude To Detroit: Buzzfeed & CNN Find Out Through FOIA That You Cannot Hack A Handwritten Letter

Jason Leopold has yet to tell us how Cernovich came into possession of his Confidential Congressional Documents, which were published by Buzzfeed, to assassinate a character in the act of blasphemy.

So, who was this FBI Special agent who had to give White House Counsel the FBI director's email address, who then, generated a missive, got Trump to approve and sign, then deliver to a third party, a letter of termination,  on the other side of town, in under four minutes?

It is simply magical, like how Michigan Attorney General Bill *Smooches* Schuette was able to get Michigan Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr to file the Detroit Fake Ass Bankruptcy within minutes of him representing the State of Michigan in the Court of Claims.

I just do not know why I want to say JonesDay.

It is almost like filing a fake ass letter of resignation in D.C. when you are in Detroit.

Manafort had lots of Corporate Shape Shifting Rock Financial mortgages, you know, but rumor has it MERS is still under SIGTARP investigation and there is also an internal audit going on of the mysteriously roaming mortgages, but hey, what do I know?

#maytheheavensfall

New FBI Documents From Mueller’s Russia Investigation Reveal What Witnesses Said About Trump

BuzzFeed News filed a public records lawsuit to get the documents Robert Mueller used to write his report. Today, we are publishing the ninth installment of what witnesses in the investigation told Mueller’s team.

A new cache of witness interview summaries from special counsel Robert Mueller’s two-year probe into Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election was released Monday in response to Freedom of Information Act lawsuits by BuzzFeed News and CNN.

Key Takeaways:

  • These documents include five pages of Jared Kushner’s FBI interview summary — but all five are completely redacted. The FBI’s notations indicate that much of the material relates to an ongoing law enforcement investigation. Senior Assistant Special Counsel Andrew Goldstein told Kushner that answering a question with “I don’t recall” if he indeed did recall was considered a lie.
  • Interview summaries for former deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland, former White House lawyer and senior Justice Department official James Burnham, and former Stone associate Randy Credico are also almost entirely redacted. McFarland and Credico’s summaries include markings that indicate redacted information relates to ongoing investigations.
  • A chunk of the 412 pages of interview summaries relates to the special counsel’s investigation of Roger Stone. That material had been withheld during Stone’s prosecution, but now that it has ended — with a 40-month prison sentence that Trump commuted — the documents are being released. They are still heavily redacted.
  • The documents indicate that in the fall of 2017, the accountant for Michael Cohen, Trump’s longtime lawyer, was under the impression that Cohen was getting a White House job and “needed to liquidate his assets.” Cohen did not get an administration position.
  • Michael Cohen used to refer to himself as “Trump’s pitbull” — before he flipped on his former boss and cooperated with Mueller — and according to his accountant, even had a statue of himself in his office bearing that title.
  • An Ohio woman who caught the attention of the special counsel’s office because in 2016 she renamed her Twitter account @Guccifer2 — after the character credited with hacking and leaking Democratic emails — told the FBI she had created the account to see if it would be censored by Twitter.
  • One witness whose name was redacted told investigators that before the Miss Universe pageant, Trump “would have all of the contestants line up on stage and then he would ask them questions about each other.” Most people would be cleared out of the room for this exchange, which was recorded, the witness said.


These documents, known as FBI 302s, shed light on what Trump administration officials and campaign staffers, as well as other people close to the president, told federal law enforcement agents about events during and after the campaign. In the last set of summaries that were released, one witness said people in Trump’s “orbit” didn’t care whom they hurt, believed their “deep state narrative,” “read books like ‘The Turner Diaries,’” and “downloaded military manuals from the internet.”

A person whose name was withheld on privacy grounds told investigators during an Aug. 11, 2017 interview that after the 2016 election Trump's "hardest" supporters were "shut out" of the new administration by the Republican National Committee, which cut a deal with Reince Priebus, the former White House chief of staff.

"They had many favors to repay the Committee. Trump gave Priebus a chance but Priebus didn't get the healthcare bill passed," the person told Mueller's investigators.

On Nov. 21, 2017, an FBI agent and two lawyers from Mueller’s office interviewed Jeffrey Getzel, who had worked as an accountant for Trump’s former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen. Getzel was under the impression that Cohen was up for a job in the White House. He told investigators that roughly a month to a month and a half before the interview, someone (whose name is redacted) told Getzel that Cohen “was going to the White House and that COHEN needed to liquidate his assets.”

Getzel said he respected Cohen’s “significant position” in the Trump Organization. He noted to investigators that Cohen had a statue of himself in his office with the phrase, “Trump’s pitbull” written on it, a phrase that Cohen used to describe himself in the past, according to CNN.

A White House job never materialized, though. Cohen would eventually turn on his former boss and cooperate with Mueller’s investigation. He pleaded guilty to financial crimes unrelated to his dealings with Trump as well as campaign finance violations related to his role orchestrating hush-money payments to two women who claimed to have had affairs with Trump.

Getzel told investigators that Cohen was “an extremely sharp individual,” but also a “difficult client” who didn’t pay his bills on time. Cohen “resented paying taxes more than most people” that Getzel did work for, he said, and would pay penalties at the end of the year rather than paying quarterly estimated taxes.

Much of Getzel’s interview summary is redacted, but one section makes clear that he spoke with Mueller’s team about Essential Consultants, the corporate entity that Cohen created to facilitate the hush-money payments. Getzel said that if he’d known more about Essential Consultants, he would have “pushed harder to encourage COHEN to include his interest in the company” in a personal financial statement.

Getzel knew about another corporate entity that Cohen recently created, Michael D. Cohen & Associates P.C. Getzel told investigators that he didn’t think the company had “any real value” because its only client was Trump, ”who had a propensity for firing people.” The Washington Post reported Cohen used that business to pitch himself as a consultant to companies based on his close ties to Trump.

“As such,” the summary reads, “MDCPC was not really a company COHEN could sell to anyone.”

One of the interview summaries is of Cassandra Ford, an Ohio woman who caught the attention of the special counsel's office because in 2016 she renamed her Twitter account @Guccifer2, after the character credited with hacking and leaking Democratic emails. Ford's identity and the interest she attracted from Mueller's investigators were first revealed in October 2018, in an article in BuzzFeed News.

Ford was interviewed by the FBI in April 2018. In the six-page summary of that encounter, much of which is redacted on privacy grounds, she explained why she created @Guccifer2 and chose to give the impression that she was Russian.

"In creating her own twitter account @Guccifer2, Ford wanted to see of the account would be censored by Twitter, because of the notoriety of Guccifer2.0," the interview summary said. She went on to say that she chose the Volgograd time zone for her Twitter account in order to “appear to be Russian.”

Screenshot of the Mueller Memos
Obtained by BuzzFeed News
“Ford used the photo of Felix Dzerzhinsky as her Twitter profile photo. Ford read in the article on Smoking Gun that some of the documents released by Guccifer2.0 persona had the name of Dzerzhinsky on internet and thought he had a ‘creative background,’” the summary said.

In a separate interview, the Republican strategist Jason Miller, who was chief spokesperson of Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, told the FBI he sought assistance from the Republican National Committee in 2016 poring over the hacked Democratic National Committee emails that WikiLeaks released. Moreover, he said he recalled hearing stories “about there potentially being a tape in which Trump used the ‘N-word."’ When the campaign learned it was the infamous Access Hollywood tape, Miller said he and the campaign went into damage control. He said he was responsible for disseminating the statement that Trump’s “grab em by the pussy” line “amounted to locker room talk.”

Although the Mueller investigation led to 37 indictments and seven convictions, Trump has aggressively sought to discredit it, repeatedly referring to it as a “witch hunt.” His efforts have been supported by Attorney General Bill Barr, who has intervened in several cases related to the investigation, including the prosecutions of former national security adviser Michael Flynn and political consultant Roger Stone. Last year, Barr also tapped a US attorney in Connecticut, John Durham, to investigate the origins of the Russia probe.

Last month — after Trump commuted Stone’s prison sentence and referred to the probe as a “hoax” and “witch hunt” that the “Left and its allies in the media perpetuated for years in an attempt to undermine the Trump Presidency” — Mueller broke his silence by writing an op-ed in the Washington Post defending his investigation. In June, in response to a separate lawsuit filed by BuzzFeed News and the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a previously blacked-out portion of the Mueller report was disclosed; it showed that Mueller’s team suspected Trump had lied to investigators in his written responses to their questions about Stone.

The final 448-page Mueller report, released in April 2019, was the most hotly anticipated prosecutorial document in a generation. But it reflected only a tiny fraction of the primary-source documents that Mueller’s team had amassed over the course of its two-year probe; much of the content of the typewritten interview summaries taken by the special counsel’s office has never before been reviewed publicly. A month after the report was released, BuzzFeed News sued the FBI and the Department of Justice, seeking access to those records. That litigation was subsequently joined by CNN.

In October, a federal judge ordered the release of the documents, and the two agencies began releasing 302s last November. Under the court order, records must be disclosed every month; to date, the government has produced about 3,000 pages of summaries from interviews with more than 500 witnesses who spoke to Mueller’s team during the course of the investigation.

The vast majority of the 302s have been heavily redacted, leaving vast swaths of information about what witnesses told investigators obscured from view. BuzzFeed News has challenged some of those redactions, arguing in court that one category of exemption the government has cited to justify the withholdings was legally unfounded, politically motivated, and implemented solely to protect the president.

DOCUMENT
PAGES
TEXT
Zoom

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness: Fraud Against The Court - Sally Yates, Michael Flynn & FISA

They still do not get it, which makes it all that much sweeter when they final do.

#maytheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

Thursday, June 4, 2020

The Legal Geniuses Of House Judiciary & Senate Homeland Security Are Still Trying To Figure Out How The Mueller Probe All Started

Whilst Jim Jordan and his merry band of "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) in the U.S. House Judiciary Committee struggle with the understanding that they already know the origins of the Mueller investigation, the Senate Homeland Security is about to subpoena all your favorite, outlandish characters, and a few who are not, like My Memo Man, who shall commence to bearing false witness, under sworn oaths, in the public record, but, hey, what do I know?

I know Mittens knows.

Why not tell Lil' Jim how it all started.

#maytheheavensfall


Senate Republicans approve subpoenas for ex-Obama officials on Russia probe origins

Democrats are decrying the investigation as election-year politics meant to rewrite the narrative of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.

WASHINGTON – The Senate Homeland Security Committee on Thursday authorized the issuing of nearly three dozen subpoenas of Obama administration officials as part of Senate Republicans' investigation into the origins of the FBI and special counsel probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and the Trump campaign.

The Judiciary Committee, meanwhile, met to consider more than 50 additional subpoenas, but postponed action until next week.

Republicans on the panels are looking into flaws in FISA application process, the “unmasking” of Trump campaign and transition officials, including ex-national security adviser Michael Flynn, and the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign more broadly — actions that President Donald Trump has collectively dubbed “Obamagate” and dismissed as a "hoax" and a "witch hunt."

“There are times when extraordinary situations require action whether or not we all agree,” Homeland Security Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., said. “The conduct we know that occurred during the transition should concern everyone and absolutely warrants further investigation.”

Democrats are decrying the investigation as election-year politics meant to rewrite the narrative of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, which concluded that while the Trump campaign did not conspire with the Russians, it had numerous contacts with Russians and, in some cases, welcomed their assistance.

“I’m disappointed that our committee is once again meeting to discuss a partisan investigation,” said Homeland Security ranking Democrat Gary Peters of Michigan. “I’m concerned about the timing of this investigation that did not become a priority until we entered into an election year.”

Tom Carper, D-Del., said in a statement that he refused to attend the meeting out of frustration that the committee is “trying to score political points and help a president in an election year.”

While 35 subpoenas were authorized by the Homeland Security Committee along party lines, Republican Sens. Rob Portman of Ohio and Mitt Romney of Utah expressed reservations. Romney said he continues “to be concerned that this is politically motivated.”

The Homeland Security and Judiciary committees are considering issuing subpoenas for former CIA Director John Brennan, ex-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former FBI Director James Comey, former Obama chief of staff Dennis McDonough, former national security adviser Susan Rice and ex-FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

The Judiciary panel is also considering subpoenas for current FBI Director Christopher Wray and former Justice Department officials, including former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and ex-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

Judiciary member Ted Cruz, R-Texas, asked Democrats on the panel to consider how they would feel if the situation were reversed and the Trump administration were looking into the former Vice President Joe Biden's presidential campaign.

"Pause for a second and imagine how you would feel if Donald J Trump was doing exactly what Barack Obama and Joe Biden did," Cruz said. "So right now, are you guys copacetic with Trump putting wiretaps on the Joe Biden presidential campaign? Everything cool if Trump has the FBI send in agents wearing wires to the Joe Biden campaign? That's all good?"

On Wednesday, former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein testified before the Judiciary Committee as part of its probe. He said in hindsight he would not have approved a FISA warrant for Trump campaign official Carter Page, but continued to defend the Mueller probe

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, February 14, 2020

No DOJ Prosecution For McCabe, But What About Detroit?

Perhaps, the reason why there will be no charges brought forth by the DOJ is because it was referred to a particular District, but, hey, what do I know?

I know Comey knows stuff.

I know that grand juries have voting rights.

I also know I 💖 MIED.

The Justice Department announced Friday that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe will not be charged following an allegation by the department's inspector general that he lied to investigators about a leak to the media.

In a letter to McCabe's attorneys, the department said that "based on the totality of the circumstances and all of the information known to the government at this time, we consider the matter closed."

The decision is not likely to sit well with President Trump.

Trump has repeatedly criticized McCabe online and in public remarks. McCabe has long been the target of Republican leaders who allege political bias within the FBI.

McCabe's wife ran for the state legislature in Virginia as a Democrat, prompting early attacks that he might be going easy on Hillary Clinton. Later, McCabe was fired after investigators concluded he lacked candor about an episode involving the release of information to a reporter.

He was relieved of duty in March, hours before he was set to retire.

McCabe always has maintained he has done nothing wrong and called himself the victim of political vengeance.

"At long last, justice has been done in this matter," McCabe's lawyers said on Friday.

"We said at the outset of the criminal investigation, almost two years ago, that if the facts and the law determined the result, no charges would be brought," they said in a statement. "We are pleased that Andrew McCabe and his family can go on with their lives without this cloud hanging over them."

Andrew McCabe, Ex-FBI Deputy, Describes 'Remarkable' Number Of Trump-Russia Contacts
The allegations against McCabe stemmed from a Justice Department Office of Inspector General's report, which found that McCabe "lacked candor" when he told investigators that he did not know who authorized an aide to talk to the Wall Street Journal about the FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

The Justice Department's decision not to pursue charges against McCabe comes a day after Attorney General William Barr publicly lashed out at Trump, saying his tweets "make it impossible for me to do my job."

McCabe has sued the Justice Department, alleging that his March 2018 firing by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions was politically motivated act of retribution by Trump and "unlawful."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, February 1, 2020

OVERSIGHT: Attempting To Find Out Why Congress Cloaks Whistleblowers

Yes, that is correct, no one likes a snitch.

Trust me, I should know.

When you are a federal employee and you snitch, they like to do things like cut off your paycheck, snatch your congressional credit union account, wipe out your pension, destroy your work history and tell everyone they know that you are crazy.

Then, if you snitch on what they are doing, like making fake ass law, stealin' children, land & votes, they will do nasty things to your children.

Yippers.

They call actions attacking the whistleblower retaliation, but you can never document retaliation against the whistleblower, if there exists anonymity.

But, if you are a whistleblower, who snitches in the public square, in the public record, on a daily basis, for over 10 years, these federal employees and elected officials, like the members of this committee, will conspire to take out their leader, through foreign sub-contractors, of course.

Just as you will see in Child Protective Services proceedings, you are not allowed to face your anonymous accuser which makes it your word against an undetermined juridic person.

So, in essence, if an anonymous whistleblower is an undetermined juridic person, then, that anonymous whistleblower has no legal standing in a court of law, making any legal proceedings to be devoid of due process.

How can you know the whistleblower is not lying, or just not credible because the Inspector General only becomes the recorder of hearsay, which is not acceptable in a court of law?

Whistleblower laws were designed to cover up fraud.

Period.

It is such a shame that the committee never asked about the definition of the "Whistleblower under Protection on Order of the Highest Authority".

#perkinscoiesucks



Monday, December 9, 2019

DOJ & OIG: Statement by Attorney General William P. Barr on the Inspector General's Report of the Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation & Report

There is much more to come because there are the Ethics Referrals and all the other District Referrals from the OIG, including Durham, Huber, Mueller, SDNY, and the Detroit Grand Juries.

Oh. and Vladimir Putin has the other side of all of that which no one wishes to discuss, the trafficking of tiny humans.

And we have yet to find out how this all started...

Attorney General William P. Barr issued the following statement:
OIG FISA Report - Crossfire Hurricane 
"Nothing is more important than the credibility and integrity of the FBI and the Department of Justice.  That is why we must hold our investigators and prosecutors to the highest ethical and professional standards.  The Inspector General’s investigation has provided critical transparency and accountability, and his work is a credit to the Department of Justice.  I would like to thank the Inspector General and his team.
The Inspector General’s report now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken.  It is also clear that, from its inception, the evidence produced by the investigation was consistently exculpatory.  Nevertheless, the investigation and surveillance was pushed forward for the duration of the campaign and deep into President Trump’s administration.  In the rush to obtain and maintain FISA surveillance of Trump campaign associates, FBI officials misled the FISA court, omitted critical exculpatory facts from their filings, and suppressed or ignored information negating the reliability of their principal source.  The Inspector General found the explanations given for these actions unsatisfactory.  While most of the misconduct identified by the Inspector General was committed in 2016 and 2017 by a small group of now-former FBI officials, the malfeasance and misfeasance detailed in the Inspector General’s report reflects a clear abuse of the FISA process.
FISA is an essential tool for the protection of the safety of the American people.  The Department of Justice and the FBI are committed to taking whatever steps are necessary to rectify the abuses that occurred and to ensure the integrity of the FISA process going forward.
No one is more dismayed about the handling of these FISA applications than Director Wray.  I have full confidence in Director Wray and his team at the FBI, as well as the thousands of dedicated line agents who work tirelessly to protect our country.  I thank the Director for the comprehensive set of proposed reforms he is announcing today, and I look forward to working with him to implement these and any other appropriate measures.
With respect to DOJ personnel discussed in the report, the Department will follow all appropriate processes and procedures, including as to any potential disciplinary action."

Review of Four FISA Applications andOther Aspects of the FBI's CrossfireHurricane Investigation 


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, September 28, 2019

JUDICIARY: House Judiciary holds hearing on Oversight of the Foreign Intel Surveillance Act

With a number of GOP lawmakers anxiously awaiting the DOJ inspector general's report on the origins of the Russia investigation, the House Judiciary Cmte takes a look at oversight of the FISA act. Deputy Attorney General for the National Security Div Brad Wiegman, Deputy Assistant FBI Director for the Counterterrorism Div Michael Orlando, and Susan Morgan of the NSA testify.


Witnesses

Mr. Brad Wiegmann 
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice, National Security Division
Mr. Michael Orlando 
Deputy Assistant Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Counterterrorism Division
Ms. Susan Morgan
National Security Agency
116th Congress

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: Rosenstein v. McCabe - The Battle Of The Wiretap

animation fun GIF by Kiszkiloszki
#maytheheavensfall
McCabe is challenging my Memo Man?

I like to call Rod "Memo Man" because of my memo tremors, but I digress.

Now, whatever shall Rod do considering the fact that he has been busy, busy, busy!

Rod knows stuff.

Matt knows lots of stuff, too.

Perhaps, Rod will #sayhisname.

FISA Wiretaps For Everyone!



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: Doug Collins & Highlights Of His Judiciary Jollie Jerry Moments - Lewandowski

Stay strong, Doug.

It will get worse.

Trust me.

#sayhisname

#perkinscoiesucks



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

JUDICIARY: Presidential Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Power - Corey Lewandowski, Rick Dearborn & Rob Porter Testimony - No One Will #sayhisname

Image may contain: 1 person, sitting
"He sees and hears everything."

#sayhisname

My colored commentary:

Trump should just stop obstructing justice and pull that IG Report from his backpocket.

Judiciary Dems issued the subpoena for Lewindowski to show up at the hearing at 10:00 a.m. 

The hearing was scheduled scheduled for 1:00 p.m.

Jolly Jerry never gave Lewindowski a marked copy of the Mueller report to refer to the questions that Jolly Jerry did not mark in his copy so no one knows what the hell he is talking about. 

JJ: "Is it true you met with the president?" 

CL: "Can you show me what page and paragraph?" 

JJ: "Just answer". 

CL: "Answer what? Where is it?"

Lewindowsky said he could not answer Her Flatulent Boviness' question because it was a rant.

Cohen's right hand is having tremors. 

He probably should not eat so much fried chicken.

Lewinsdowsky is a whistleblower.

Did Hope Hicks change Lewandowski's letter?

Judiciary does not know why the Special Counsel was called. 

The Special Counsel was not for Trump.

If Judiciary would only #sayhisname.

Judiciary is constructing an "attack the consultant" transposable model.

How cute.

Look at the row of Praetorian #perkinscoiesucks privatized Judiciary consultant staffers.

Lewandowski is friends with Sessions.

Dearborn worked as Chief of Staff with Sessions. This is getting good.

The video went to recess because Jolly Jerry said Collins asked for a recess which he did not, so the video blanked. 

Oh wait, Jolly Jerry just called a one minute recess without but came back from recess and gavelled the end of the hearing.

#perkinscoiesucks



Corey Lewandowski is a whistleblower.



Judiciary has absolutely no idea of what is about to happen.

I got popcorn because this sounds like a CPS ex-parte hearing for removal.

#maytheheavensfall

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©


Sunday, September 8, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: A Secret Detroit Love Memo To Comey - Jeanine Pirro Sucks

Image result for evening gown drinking champagne 1920s
"She bears false witness. Deliver her chattels unto me."
Dearest Jimmy,

As you embark upon this reproachable journey with me, watching this woman excrete a cacophony of an insurrectionist diatribe, stoking the passions of the desperate, I shall hold your hand and the hands of multiple law enforcement agencies, so as not to pistol whip this skank.

She falsely advises Trump.

She bears false witness in the public record,

She promulgates hate.

She is a liar and a thief, of the most vile kind.

Deliver her and her chattels onto me.

Much love,

The Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed.

Sssshhhhh....whatever you do, do not tell anyone I just published this secret memo I wrote to you. I may be accused of stuff by the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).


#sayhisname


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, August 31, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: Don McGahn Was Mean To Trump, Again, But Barb McQuade Remedied With Citation

Well, now.

It seems Don McGahn is back to his old tricks again, but Barb McQuade was swift to correct, with supportive citation, mind you.

I think it is time to help Jolly Judiciary Jerry Nadler with his quest for impeachment hearings so we can find out why Donnie likes to lie to Trump all the time.

It is not nice to falsely advise a sitting POTUS.

In fact, it is treasonous, because he did it to cover up stealin' the children, the land and the votes.

All Hail The FBI Whistleblowers!!!!


1664. PROTECTION OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY -- THEFT OF GOVERNMENT INFORMATION

Section 641 of Title 18 prohibits theft or receipt of stolen government information as well as theft of the documents, computer discs, etc., that contain the information. United States v. Fowler, 932 F.2d 306, 309-10 (4th Cir. 1991); United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 70-71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 (1979); United States v. DiGilio 538 F.2d 972, 977-78 (3rd Cir. 1976), cert. denied sub nom. Lupo v. United States, 429 U.S. 1038 (1977). But see United States v. Tobias, 836 F.2d 449, 451 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 991 (1988). Nevertheless, for the reasons set forth below, the Criminal Division believes that it is inappropriate to bring a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 641 when: (1) the subject of the theft is intangible property, i.e., government information owned by, or under the care, custody, or control of the United States; (2) the defendant obtained or used the property primarily for the purpose of disseminating it to the public; and (3) the property was not obtained as a result of wiretapping, (18 U.S.C. § 2511) interception of correspondence (18 U.S.C. §§ 1702, 1708), criminal entry, or criminal or civil trespass.
There are two reasons for the policy. First, it protects "whistle-blowers." Thus, under this policy, a government employee who, for the primary purpose of public exposure of the material, reveals a government document to which he or she gained access lawfully or by non-trespassory means would not be subject to criminal prosecution for the theft. Second, the policy is designed to protect members of the press from the threat of being prosecuted for theft or receipt of stolen property when, motivated primarily by the interest in public dissemination thereof, they publish information owned by or under the custody of the government after they obtained such information by other than trespassory means.
The Criminal Division does not intend, in promulgating this policy, to prevent or discourage prosecutions under any other applicable statutes, such as those prohibiting the unauthorized dissemination or possession of government information, e.g., 18 U.S.C. §§ 793, 794, 1905, or 50 U.S.C. §  783. Instead, the Division's purpose is to require that, in the circumstances enumerated above, such cases are prosecuted under these other applicable statutes rather than under 18 U.S.C. § 641.
The adoption of this policy does not alter the responsibility of government employees to maintain the confidentiality of sensitive government information disclosed to them in the course of their employment.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, August 30, 2019

What Do Jim Jordan, Judiciary & Comey Have In Common?


Q: What do Jordan, Judiciary and Jim Comey have in common?

A: They refuse to #sayhisname.

No, Jim.

You and the entire U.S. Congress, Executive and the Judicial Branches owe someone else an apology for stealin' the children, the land and the votes.

#heavensshallfall as soon as someone will #sayhisname


Even Rod Rosenstein chimed in.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/rod-rosenstein-shades-comey-rips-msnbc-cnn-pundits

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, July 20, 2019

What I Would Ask Robert Mueller If I Was A Member Of Judiciary

Well, there seems to be a new game going around the cyberverse called "What I would ask Robert Mueller."

Since members are only allotted five minutes, I decided to respect the economy of time.

Here are my 5 questions:

  1. How much longer before you #sayhisname?
  2. When are you coming to Detroit?
  3. When is the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed to be released?
  4. Did you ever learn to dig clams?
  5. Which member will be the first to have a meltdown?

I reserve the balance of my time for the other members.

The public must understand it takes a few extra moments to compose oneself to frame the questions properly when experiencing a spiritual implosion.

What I Would Ask Robert Mueller

By James Comey

If I were a member of Congress with five minutes to question Robert Mueller, I would ask short questions drawn from the report’s executive summaries.

Volume One: Russia

Did you find that there were a series of contacts between the Trump campaign and individuals with ties to the Russian government? (p. 5)

In particular, did you find that a Trump foreign policy adviser learned that the Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of emails? (pp. 5-6)

Did you find that the Trump foreign policy adviser said the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to candidate Clinton? (p. 6)

Did you find that senior members of the Trump campaign met with Russian representatives at Trump Tower after being told in an email that the meeting was part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump? (p. 6)

Did you find that, despite the fact that candidate Trump said he had "nothing to do with Russia," his organization had been pursuing a major Moscow project into the middle of the election year and that candidate Trump was regularly updated on developments? (vol 1, p. 5: vol 2, p. 19)

Did the Trump campaign report any of its Russian contacts to the FBI?

Not even the indications from the Russian government that it could assist the campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to candidate Clinton?

Volume Two: Obstruction

Did you reach a judgment as to whether the president had committed obstruction of justice crimes?

Did you find substantial evidence that the president had committed obstruction of justice crimes?

For example, did you find that the president directed the White House counsel to call the acting attorney general and tell him the special counsel must be removed? (p. 4)

Did you find that the White House counsel decided he would rather resign than carry out that order? (p. 4)

Did you find that the president later directed the White House counsel to say he had not been ordered to have the special counsel removed? (p. 6)

Did you find that the president wanted the White House counsel to write a false memo saying he had not been ordered to have the special counsel removed? (p. 6)

Did you find that the White House counsel refused to do that because it was not true? (p. 6)

Did you find that the president repeatedly asked a private citizen—his former campaign manager—to deliver a message to the attorney general to restrict the special counsel to investigating only future campaign interference? (p. 5)


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: Trump Trolls Mueller & Comey

Oooooo..... a double troll!


#sayhisname

#needmorechaos

#freemariabutina

#maytheheavensfall

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: Comey Told Barr To Stop Sliming

Yes, Barr should show us what he found, or Trump could just pull that IG Report burning an obstruction of justice hole in his back pocket.
#NeedMoreChaos

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©