Jim Jordan just asked, "Why did we shutdown the economy? Was it a stress test on the system because hospitals are closing and laying off?"
Well, if you did not know, Jim Jordan is probably being Stressed by the Wexner, because those hospitals are the ones shuttering, the tiny human research hospital network, or rather the Children's Hospitals Miracle Network, universities tiny human research, and all other types of frauds going through privatized foreign health care system in the U.S.
The Constitution enshrines the right to vote and grants Congress the authority to legislate to protect that right. Despite hard-fought victories to protect and expand voting rights, today many Americans—especially those in minority communities—face significant barriers to registering to vote and casting a ballot. The Committee has been investigating barriers to voting for the last year. In March 2019, the Committee launched investigations of allegations of voter suppression in Georgia, Texas, and Kansas. On May 1, 2019, the Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties led by Chairman Jamie Raskin held a hearing on “Protecting the Right to Vote: Best and Worst Practices.”
When you are a federal employee and you snitch, they like to do things like cut off your paycheck, snatch your congressional credit union account, wipe out your pension, destroy your work history and tell everyone they know that you are crazy.
Then, if you snitch on what they are doing, like making fake ass law, stealin' children, land & votes, they will do nasty things to your children.
Yippers.
They call actions attacking the whistleblower retaliation, but you can never document retaliation against the whistleblower, if there exists anonymity.
But, if you are a whistleblower, who snitches in the public square, in the public record, on a daily basis, for over 10 years, these federal employees and elected officials, like the members of this committee, will conspire to take out their leader, through foreign sub-contractors, of course.
Just as you will see in Child Protective Services proceedings, you are not allowed to face your anonymous accuser which makes it your word against an undetermined juridic person.
So, in essence, if an anonymous whistleblower is an undetermined juridic person, then, that anonymous whistleblower has no legal standing in a court of law, making any legal proceedings to be devoid of due process.
How can you know the whistleblower is not lying, or just not credible because the Inspector General only becomes the recorder of hearsay, which is not acceptable in a court of law?
Whistleblower laws were designed to cover up fraud.
Period.
It is such a shame that the committee never asked about the definition of the "Whistleblower under Protection on Order of the Highest Authority".
The U.S. House Oversight Committee on the 2020 Census to get an accurate account, but everyone has failed on two fronts, the first being labeling of the variable of race.
Now, I am going to have to have someone provide me with the operationalization of the tools for measurement of race.
I was always told race was determined by the enumerator, perOMB Directive 15 but I ended up finding the legal tool for it.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
DIRECTIVE NO. 15
Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics
and Administrative Reporting
(as adopted on May 12, 1977)
This Directive provides standard classifications for record keeping, collection, and presentation of data on race and ethnicity in Federal program administrative reporting and statistical activities. These classifications should not be interpreted as being scientific or anthropological in nature, nor should they be viewed as determinants of eligibility for participation in any Federal program. They have been developed in response to needs expressed by both the executive branch and the Congress to provide for the collection and use of compatible, nonduplicated, exchangeable racial and ethnic data by Federal agencies.
1. Definitions
The basic racial and ethnic categories for Federal statistics and program administrative reporting are defined as follows:
American Indian or Alaskan Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North America, and who maintains cultural identification through tribal affiliation or community recognition.
Asian or Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands. This area includes, for example, China, India, Japan, Korea, the Philippine Islands, and Samoa.
Black. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
Hispanic. A person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race.
White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, North Africa, or the Middle East.
2. Utilization for Record keeping and Reporting
To provide flexibility, it is preferable to collect data on race and ethnicity separately. If separate race and ethnic categories are used, the minimum designations are:
Race:
-- American Indian or Alaskan Native
--Asian or Pacific Islander
--Black
--White
Ethnicity:
--Hispanic origin
--Not of Hispanic origin
When race and ethnicity are collected separately, the number of White and Black persons who are Hispanic must be identifiable, and capable of being reported in that category.
If a combined format is used to collect racial and ethnic data, the minimum acceptable categories are:
--American Indian or Alaskan Native
--Asian or Pacific Islander
--Black, not of Hispanic origin
--Hispanic
--White, not of Hispanic origin.
The category which most closely reflects the individual's recognition in his community should be used for purposes of reporting on persons who are of mixed racial and/or ethnic origins.
In no case should the provisions of this Directive be construed to limit the collection of data to the categories described above. However, any reporting required which uses more detail shall be organized in such a way that the additional categories can be aggregated into these basic racial/ethnic categories.
This was about the same time the term "African-Americans" came to be fashionable.
The African-Americans, a term Jesse Jackson coined, needs to told as his tale.
If Africa is a continent, and the United States is a nation, does that mean African Americans have dual citizenship or are these votes disqualified under Voter ID laws? Not everyone from the continent of Africa is of the darker persuasion.
Not everyone of the darker persuasion is from Africa.
If Colored Person A procreates with Colored Person B, producing Colored Offspring X; and, Colored Person C procreates with Colored Person D, producing Colored Offspring Y; where, Colored Offspring X and Colored Offspring Y procreate to produce Colored Offspring XY, does the zygote qualify for reparations?
Here is an example of law that allows the U.S. to label one, based upon the status of the mother, Partus Sequitur Ventrum, more readily understood as the one-drop rule of property ownership under the law of chattels.
Every local registrar may, as soon as practicable, have such registration certificate made by or for each person in his district who so desires, born before June fourteen, nineteen hundred and twelve, for whom he has not on file a registration certificate, or a birth certificate.
2. It shall be a felony for any person wilfully or knowingly to make a registration certificate false as to color or race. The wilful making of a false registration or birth certificate shall be punished by confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
3. For each registration certificate properly made and returned to the State Registrar, the local registrar returning the same shall be entitled to a fee of twenty-five cents, to be paid by the registrant. Application for registration and for transcript may be made direct to the State Registrar, who may retain the fee for expenses of his office.
4. No marriage license shall be granted until the clerk or deputy clerk has reasonable assurance that the statements as to color of both man and woman are correct.
If there is reasonable cause to disbelieve that applicants are of pure white race, when that fact is stated, the clerk or deputy clerk shall withhold the granting of the license until satisfactory proof is produced that both applicants are "white persons" as provided for in this act.
The clerk or deputy clerk shall use the same care to assure himself that both applicants are colored, when that fact is claimed.
5. It shall hereafter be unlawful for any white person in this State to marry any save a white person, or a person with no other admixture of blood than white and American Indian. For the purpose of this act, the term "white person" shall apply only to the person who has no trace whatsoever of any blood other than Caucasian; but persons who have one-sixteenth or less of the blood of the American Indian and have no other non-Caucasic blood shall be deemed to be white persons. All laws heretofore passed and now in effect regarding the intermarriage of white and colored persons shall apply to marriages prohibited by this act.
6. For carrying out the purposes of this act and to provide the necessary clerical assistance, postage and other expenses of the State Registrar of Vital Statistics, twenty per cent of the fees received by local registrars under this act shall be paid to the State Bureau of Vital Statistics, which may be expended by the said bureau for the purposes of this act.
7. All acts or parts of acts inconsistent with this act are, to the extent of such inconsistency, hereby repealed.
If one is "not colored", does that make them invisible, and if they are invisible, how can you count them?
FUN FACT! ABSENTEE BALLOTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE SAME CORPORATE PARENTAL RIGHT LAWS
I have a better suggestion to get a better count of our U.S. population.
How about answering this question:
Now, what is the citizenship of the foster kid?
So, if a child is a citizen of Guatemala crosses the Mexican-U.S. Border, to be taken into U.S. custody and placed under a privatized, state contracted child placing agency like Bethany Christian, a Michigan licensed business entity, which is under the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, a foreign corporation, where that child is processed through the policy, not law, like DACA & DAPA, of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children under the legal aegis of the contracting state Child Placing Agency, qualifying the child for Targeted Case Management billing reimbursement of Medicaid for the purposes of concurrent case planning to fast track Termination of Parental Rights for adoption, which includes a new identity and an issued Social Security Number, what is the citizenship of that child and what happens with the original identity?
So, instead of listening to the dribbled of ignorance of this hearing, I would like to inform "The Elected Ones" that we did not count the babies until the early 20th Century, but do not tell them that because the lord was the keeper of the record.
The church record of the birth, not the certificate.
Then, no one is talking about the live and dead births certificates.
No one is talking about Foster Care and Adoption.
No one is talking about those fake identities after termination of parental rights over the children, hailing from "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth).
Here is a synoptic overview on how they child welfare industry can multiple a child's identity to maximize revenues".
So, if the U.S. conjures up their own laws on how to count "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth), will it be challenged by the Holy See because it does not have any legal congruency, outside the U.S.?
That would be fun!
Again, to keep with my ad nauseum theme of coming up with new and improved ways of trying to get people to understand that the residuals of the peculiar institution are alive and thriving for the simple fact that slavery was never, ever abolished, I shall close out this round of castigation with one of my favorite taglines.
#Time2AuditGod
Who owns the child because corporations are people, too.
BALTIMORE (AP) — Maryland Rep. Elijah E. Cummings died early Thursday at Johns Hopkins Hospital due to complications from longstanding health challenges, his congressional office said. He was 68.
A sharecropper's son, Cummings became the powerful chairman of a U.S. House committee that investigated President Donald Trump, and was a formidable orator who passionately advocated for the poor in his black-majority district, which encompasses a large portion of Baltimore as well as more well-to-do suburbs.
As chairman of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Cummings led multiple investigations of the president's governmental dealings, including probes in 2019 relating to the president's family members serving in the White House.
Trump responded by criticizing the Democrat's district as a "rodent-infested mess" where "no human being would want to live." The comments came weeks after Trump drew bipartisan condemnation following his calls for Democratic congresswomen of color to get out of the U.S. "right now," and go back to their "broken and crime-infested countries."
Cummings replied that government officials must stop making "hateful, incendiary comments" that only serve to divide and distract the nation from its real problems, including mass shootings and white supremacy.
"Those in the highest levels of the government must stop invoking fear, using racist language and encouraging reprehensible behavior," Cummings said in a speech at the National Press Club.
Cummings' long career spanned decades in Maryland politics. He rose through the ranks of the Maryland House of Delegates before winning his congressional seat in a special election in 1996 to replace former Rep. Kweisi Mfume, who left the seat to lead the NAACP.
Cummings continued his rise in Congress. In 2016, he was the senior Democrat on the House Benghazi Committee, which he said was "nothing more than a taxpayer-funded effort to bring harm to Hillary Clinton's campaign" for president.
Cummings was an early supporter of Barack Obama's presidential bid in 2008.
I'm begging the American people to pay attention to what is going on. Because if you want to have a democracy intact for your children, and your children's children, and generations yet unborn we've got to guard this moment…this is our watch. pic.twitter.com/ShTZwbQROP
With a number of GOP lawmakers anxiously awaiting the DOJ inspector general's report on the origins of the Russia investigation, the House Judiciary Cmte takes a look at oversight of the FISA act. Deputy Attorney General for the National Security Div Brad Wiegman, Deputy Assistant FBI Director for the Counterterrorism Div Michael Orlando, and Susan Morgan of the NSA testify.
Witnesses
Mr. Brad Wiegmann
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice, National Security Division
The "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) continue their great search for the origins of the investigation.
I am waiting to see how much longer it takes for them to figure it out because I published the press release a few years ago and blog every single day about it.
I also know that the "Elected Ones" are a reflection of how poorly our educational system functions.
“Overseeing the Overseers: Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency @ 10 Years”
#maytheheavensfall
Witnesses
Ms. Kathy Buller
Inspector General, Peace Corps, on behalf of Executive Director, Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency Legislation Committee
Mr. Scott Dahl
Inspector General, Department of Labor, on behalf of Chairman, Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Mr. Michael Horowitz
Inspector General, Department of Justice, on behalf of Chairman, Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
This report examines the emerging regulatory and policy landscape surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) in jurisdictions around the world and in the European Union. In addition, a survey of international organizations describes the approach that United Nations agencies and regional organizations have taken towards AI. As the regulation of AI is still in its infancy, guidelines, ethics codes, and actions by and statements from governments and their agencies on AI are also addressed. While the country surveys look at various legal issues, including data protection and privacy, transparency, human oversight, surveillance, public administration and services, autonomous vehicles, and lethal autonomous weapons systems, the most advanced regulations were found in the area of autonomous vehicles, in particular for the testing of such vehicles.
Instead of addressing the public corruption, the fraud, waste, abuse and trafficking tiny humans in the States and Counties Child Welfare Programs, there is a push to continue dumping more money into the expansion of more Public Private Partnership, by making these foreign operations more governmental like so they can take control of more of the money so they can come up with more Social Impact Bond programs in the schools and Foster Care.
Betsy already pitched the model by reanimating 1960s segregation operations.
Lots of issues with unfunded mandates because Michigan has been pushing, or rather Betsy DeVos has, for these Public Private Partnerships to become eligible to transfer control of the entire Child Welfare System funding so they can put in the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to maximize revenues to be able to cover these unfunded mandates.
TRANSLATION: GIVE US THE MONEY SO WE CAN STEAL IT, LAUNDER IT OVERSEAS THROUGH FAKE ASS CHILD WELFARE NGOs, INVEST IN FAKE ASS CHILDREN'S TRUSTS, TO FUND POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS SO WE CAN COME UP WITH MORE LAWS TO GET US MORE CRAPPY CHILD WELFARE PROGRAMS TO KEEP STEALIN' THE CHILDREN, THE LAND, AND THE VOTES.
Carbone came up about municipal bonds, waste treatment facilities, water rights, etc. because everything is being privatized, but SCOTUS did not consider public corruption and fraud or its ills upon the people.
They want to push private technological partnerships to reduce administrative costs, but failed to mention there are no civil rights in the private sector.
You cannot FOIA a private corporation.
You have not Right to Grievance or Due Process when under the legal auspices of a corporate parent when it comes to asset forfeiture for a civil debt, or rather, being a member of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth.)
Start @23:26 where Representative Paul Gosar asks McAleenan about ICE detaining children.
He asks about Child Protective Services.
He sets up the caveat of a children being taken across state lines where someone cannot provide water and safety, like ICE.
I want to see someone calling in California, Texas, Arizona Child Protective Services come in and execute their process of legally kidnapping children.
How come children in ICE do not get CPS intervention, considering CPS will snatch a kid if the wind blows in a different direction.
Elijah Cummings is not happy because ICE refuses to release information about the children.
Elijah does not know that "in the best interests of the child" DHS does not have to release anything.
Those kids are being fast tracked on concurrent planning, which means adoption.
Chatter on the streets, as Michigan got those contracts, is new identities are being assigned.
DHS cannot even mesh with SACWIS, well, at least not in Michigan because Nancy Edmunds allowed the state to dole out more money, to try and fix a human trafficking data base, that was never designed to do anything but to generate false claims in modern day residuals of the peculiar institution.
For McAleenan to say he does not know what to do, is ground for his removal from office because all he had to do was to use google because I have databases, unless I am suppressed by Google in searches, which would mean he is being improperly advised in search results, but I digress.
The U.S. has other borders, but no one is talking about the trafficking of tiny humans from our ports or Norther boarder, or our other Southern border, in Michigan, or children from other countries, like Russia, Ukraine, Kosovo, Poland, Haiti, Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya....and the list goes on.
I broke this down to its most simplistic factors for understanding about the industry of the residuals of the peculiar institution called Foster Care & Adoption.
Just close your eyes and allow the imagines of The Good Ship Jesus, whose cargo was tiny humans, trafficked across borders.
Once a border baby is placed in the privatized contract of a state, Michigan, the financial ratlines commence for a life of hell for these children... under Michigan laws, where MIED Judge Nancy Edmunds will not do a damn thing about for the last 15 years or so about Michigan, Child Welfare System, because it all started in Michigan.
How come no one asked the State Department to come in and discuss USAID and its foreign, child welfare corporate NGO contractors like the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops?
DWS got real on McAleenan not knowing about interior children being picked up and placed in Un Accompanied Children policy care.
This is more CPS activity of privately contracted Child Placing Agencies.
But she did show up for her interview on FOX News with Sean Hannity.
What Kellyanne fails to understand is that this hearing was not just about her, but the history of using political campaign resources and the resources of an elected office for personal inurement.
Kellyanne fails to understand that by ignoring congress, she has now opened herself up to being challenged of being stripped of, not just her attorney client privilege immunities, but her license to practice law, itself.
Kellyanne fails to understand that she is held to a higher scrutiny because she is a public figure, beholden to a very special set of laws in ethics.
Speaking of ethics, I believe Trump is still obstructing justice by keeping that DOJ OIG Report, referred by the Ethics Committee, in his backpocket.
Kellyanne has much to be concerned about ethical content of her character because.
HHS just got $3 billion in funding for immigrant children, so you know what that means for foster care and adoption...
Watergate covered up CAPTA.
Whitewater covered up ASFA.
Russiagate is covering up the Families First Act.
I still have yet to figure out if the Witness, Nagda is lying in the congressional record to cover up crimes against humanity, compromised, or just dumb as dirt.
Q: Why did CPS snatch the kid?
A: Because she was having a bad hair day.
Q: What is the best interests of the child?
A: When you meet your federal mandated child placing quotas to keep your job.
Q: Why does congress refuse to speak upon the horrors of trafficking tiny humans in congress?
A: Because, if they do, they will lose their re-election campaign funding.
Q: Why does congress refuse to change the laws in trafficking tiny humans?
A: Because the international markets would crash and "The Elected Ones" would have to focus all their time on campaigning for a legal defense of war crimes.
Q: Why is there Faith Based Funding and Medicaid Expansion private contracts in cue for appropriations for children at the border?
A: Because using foster kids as lab rats is in the best interests of the child, when investing in these foreign corporations on Wall Street.
ICE Homan got real.
It is not DHS nor ICE; it is the law.
Raskin is absolutely clueless as he has no idea of what Termination of Parental Rights is.
Raskin is daft when it comes to what is considered as abuse and neglect.
Failure to provide for the necessary needs of the child is called abuse and neglect, otherwise known as poverty.
Raskin has no idea that it is still legal to procure and purvey tiny humans, and to think, he sits on House Judiciary, or perhaps he does and is just playing dumb.
I have to give him credit for something, you know.
Connolly got dramatic about how we treat children, but refused to talk about domestic and international foster care and adoption.
If he thought these stories at the border were gut wrenching, I would strongly encourage him not to look at ills of child welfare in the United States, particularly the Public Private Partnerships like the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
If he did, we might have to ask Betsy DeVos & co. about their privatized trafficking tiny human contracts.
Maybe, just maybe, one day, someone up there in the Ivory Tower on the Hill will figure out what the word, "except" means in the Thirteenth Amendment.
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
No one cares because if they did, they would #sayhisname.
Between April 2018 and June 2018, the Trump Administration separated at least 2,800 children from their parents at the southern border under the “zero tolerance” policy that Attorney General Jeff Sessions instituted in April 2018 and a related policy that DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen instituted a few weeks later to refer all parents who made unauthorized border crossings for prosecution. In January 2019, the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services issued a report finding that the Trump Administration may have separated “thousands” of additional children before the zero tolerance policy went into effect. In addition, the Trump Administration recently admitted to separating an additional 700 children from their parents at the border after June 2018. Recent reports have identified deteriorating conditions in border facilities where children are being detained. For example, reports from the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security have highlighted overcrowded, unhealthy, and unsafe conditions in these facilities, and they have warned that these issues need to be addressed immediately to mitigate health and safety risks. Other recent reports have raised concerns about racist, sexist, and xenophobic views expressed by some Border Patrol officers regarding detained immigrants through a secret Facebook group.
The best way to stop the separation of children from their parents at the borders is to just tell the truth of what will happen to their children upon entry into the U.S.
