Monday, May 6, 2019

EDUCATION: School Re-Segregation - Brown v. Board Of Education - A Residual Of Predictive Modeling Crap Databases Of Property Ownership & Gerrymandering

Before you watch this very painful hearing of educators who are poorly educated on the history of Brown v. Board of Education, here is the condensed congressional history that they are attempting to bleach and "re-segregate".

This was basically a #clownfest of individuals who are trying to pitch their new and improved versions of history, while trying to increase their foreign corporate profits by reanimating the residuals of the peculiar institution by telling really creative tales of how they are best to steward all the public education funding for students without saying that they are going to self embolden themselves with corporate parental rights in their school model for "The Poors".

Yes, this was a privatization pitch and there was not one mention of Detroit, where it all started.



Pierre is talking about black families being dissipated? 

Linda Darling-Hammond
Linda Darling-Hammond,
Predictive Modeling Crapper
"She is creepy."
WTF?  Dude needs some serious therapy.

what the hell 

schrier is talking real estate and financial investment.

The respondents are talking about investing.

this is gerrymandering

Scott stated that submissions into the record was open until May 14th, 2019 by 5:00 p.m. 

I see nothing on the committee site but I did find this if anyone is interested in commenting you can go to the following links: 


Charter schools suck, badly.  I know.  I am in Detroit. They started here.

This is geopolitical.


Then the Emergency Manager Law came in and privatized education.



These foreign corporations own our schools and I speculate there are land patents involved.

This is about forced migration.

There studies are crappy data collection methodology are like harvesting wheat shafts with scythes in the hot summer sun.

John C. Brittain
John Brittain, Attorney
who has no clue about the dirty
deeds of the NAACP
Brown v. Board of Education was based on a science study, "Tanks v. Talent".

Basically, the study was a parody to the study that said, "kids who grew up reading the newspaper in the home got more scholarships for universities and performed better on tests."

The study was done in the 1950s where only "certain people" could own property.

For example, sharecroppers had no toilets.

They had outhouses, not tanks in the home.

Indoor plumbing was for the rich, who owned houses, not shacks.

People in shacks could not afford to purchase a newspaper, which means, according to the original study, would be not able to get scholarships, would not perform well on tests, and as such, would never succeed to be property owners.

Ergo, the more the toilets in the home, the smarter and more successful in life the kids.

Kim Schrier, official portrait, 116th Congress.jpg
Kim Schrier
I used to have the study found in the African American History Journal, but Jstor is privatized, and got copyright on a case used in the Brown v. Board education, so I do not know why it is not in the public domain.

These DeVos witnesses, yes, conflict of interest, are talking about privatizing to help the state with their growing foster care and homeless students populations.

This is TARP.

They stole the children, the land and the votes, creating this population of foster care and homeless students, but I did learn something new!

These witnesses have redefined race by lumping English as a Second Language population as students of color.

They are skewing dirty data.....I love it because everyone up there on the diaz in committee, including their staff, are absolutely unqualified to catch that these people are pumping some some hard core, raw, predictive modeling crap.

This Darling-Hammond just said that kids tear up the schools and get more detention but did she say anything about the schools not having heat or books?

Nope, because she comes from a wealthy school district.

I bet she hangs out with Blasey-ford over there at Stanford but I did find their charter schools think tank which is probably run by some of those trust fund babies mommy and daddy dropped millions to get them into these graduate positions.

These are the people who are doing that generational gerrymandering.

Lessons for Developing School and District Capacity to Transform Literacy Instruction: The Canterbury Learning Collaborative

I knew I would find Social Impact Bonds.

https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/


They are mapping out voting districts through paramilitary instructor, not educator, networks.


Photo: Dan Losen
Daniel Losen,
He who does not know
Gracie Lee Boggs
or anything about the history
of Civil Rights
These people are talking about lumping racial disparities and psychological disabilities into quotas as their newly made up term of "re-segregation?

I just got chills of terror for these people, of whom command our educational institutions are a caustic affront, besmirching the profession of higher learning, by transmogrifying schools into institutions of predictive modeling  for civil asset forfeiture.

How can they even mention the "School-to-Prison" pipeline without mentioning Gracie Lee Boggs?

Seriously?


There they go talking that race crap as a reason to get more money for community development.

Jahana Hayes, official portrait, 116th Congress.jpg
Jahana Hayes,
the only one with common sense
I can smell the carve out from their entire second round of another TARP hustle to get more money through their reparations propaganda.

No parents wakes up and says, "oh, we cannot let little Johnny go to that school because there are too many (fill in the blank)."

Please, someone, make the stupid stop.

These people speak as if they have never set afoot in Detroit, where this entire privatized, charter school model was set up and failed miserably.


Defiance?

These people are talking about defiance in children.

Did you know there is a disorder called Oppositional Defiance Disorder and they have psychotropics to prescribe for it.
David Trone official photo.jpg
David Trone
should not be around
any children's issues

They used foster kids for the lab rat researach.

Here is an example of the growing foster care and homeless population of kids they want to service, as opposed to ending child poverty, but I digress.

You snatch a kid from his fmaily for being poor.

You put the kid in a foster care placement, that the Secretary of Education just so happens to have a familiar financial interest in the child placing agency privatized contracts.

The kid wants to go home.

You dope the kid up because the kid opposes foster care or being homeless.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

No comments: