Not one member of the Senate Judiciary Committee asked Amy how she got those tiny Haitian Humans.
#maytheheavensfall
Some White colonizers "adopted" Black children. They "civilized" these "savage" children in the "superior" ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity. https://t.co/XBE9rRnoqq
$10M to Dr. Ibram Kendi and the Center for Antiracist Research at BU. This research will inform and fuel much needed and overdue policy change. I appreciate you Dr. Kendi, and I’m grateful for your work! https://t.co/M2zvIQYeEO
(CNN)Judge Amy Coney Barrett initially failed to disclose two talks she gave in 2013 hosted by two anti-abortion student groups on paperwork provided to the Senate ahead of her confirmation hearing to become the next Supreme Court justice.
Barrett, President Donald Trump's nominee to succeed Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, gave the talks -- a lecture and a seminar -- in 2013 in her capacity as a law professor at the University of Notre Dame. The seminar was co-sponsored by the school's Right to Life club and constitutional studies minor, and the lecture was held by the law school's Jus Vitae club. CNN's KFile found advertisements for two lectures on social media and in a weekly Notre Dame faculty newsletter.
Late on Friday night, hours after this story published, the Senate Judiciary Committee released a supplemental update to Barrett's committee questionnaire that includes the lecture and seminar, as well as a paid advertisement she signed that criticized Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed support for Notre Dame's "commitment to the right to life." The release came after CNN asked the White House about the advertisement earlier on Friday.
It is not known what was said in the two events, though both centered on abortion court cases. In a separate instance, CNN's KFile found a publicized talk that Barrett gave to coincide with the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade -- a seminar Barrett disclosed in her Senate paperwork -- was removed by the university from YouTube in 2014. A school spokesman told CNN the video is now lost.
Content by CNN Underscored
Barrett's confirmation to the Supreme Court would strengthen its current conservative majority -- creating a 6-3 bloc of conservative justices -- and could limit abortion access.
Barrett's initial failure to disclose the two events also raises questions about whether the questionnaire is complete or whether there will be any consequences from the Republican-led Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees her confirmation hearing. Past chairmen of the powerful committee have halted the nomination process after judicial nominees omitted information in their Senate paperwork but under committee Chairman Lindsey Graham that scenario is unlikely.
The committee has slated a hearing for Barrett on October 12 in an effort to confirm her by the full Senate before the election.
Senate Democrats on the Judiciary Committee sent a letter to the Justice Department this week that said Barrett did omit materials concerning Roe v. Wade and asked if Barrett omitted any more materials after the National Review reported that Barrett signed a letter on a "right to life" ad in 2006 that called for the end of the landmark legal decision.
White House spokesperson Judd Deere told CNN in an email, "Judge Barrett submitted her lengthy Senate Judiciary Questionnaire, spoke with an overwhelming majority of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and continues to be transparent throughout her confirmation process. She looks forward to answering questions from the Senators next week."
A spokesperson for the Senate Judiciary Committee told CNN "it is a very normal practice" for Supreme Court nominees to update their questionnaire, noting that several current Supreme Court justices also supplied updated copies.
CNN reached out multiple times to Barrett through her law chambers but did not get a response.
While Barrett's association with anti-abortion groups has come under scrutiny -- including signing a Right to Life ad in 2006 -- little has been examined about her work with anti-abortion groups at Notre Dame. Barrett gave the talks hosted by the anti-abortion student groups while she was also a member of the Notre Dame chapter University Faculty for Life, which staunchly opposes abortion.
In 2016, the group sent a letter asking the university to rescind an award honored to then-Vice President Joe Biden in recognition for his work as an American Catholic. The group called it "a scandalous violation of the University's moral responsibility (as the American bishops wrote in 2004) never to honor those who act in defiance of fundamental moral principles about the sanctity of life" and attacked his views on abortion.
Barrett initially failed to disclose two seminars she gave students on Roe v. Wade
In April 2013, Barrett gave a small hour-long seminar "for students on changes to law and life for women after Roe v. Wade" entitled "Being a Woman After Roe."
According to a copy of the Facebook event advertising the seminar, spots were limited to 15 students. A student publication promoted the event as an informal seminar, small group setting in which students can learn more from faculty members who oppose abortion.
"The Right to Life Seminar Series was begun as an opportunity for students and professors to discuss a variety of issues related to human life and dignity," an advertisement for the event reads.
The conservative judge also did not disclose that in November 2013 she spoke to Jus Vitae, the law school's Right to Life club, on "The Supreme Court's Abortion Jurisprudence." The law school advertised the lecture as focusing on Roe v. Wade and the cases that followed it, including cases that were being litigated on the lower courts at that time.
The lecture Barrett did disclose was entitled "Roe at 40: The Supreme Court, Abortion, and the Culture War that Followed," taking place in January 2013 and open to the university community. It was co-sponsored by the university's Constitutional Studies minor.
However, video for the lecture, which CNN's KFile found on the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine was advertised by the school as being available on YouTube, was removed by the user in 2014, according to a YouTube spokesperson.
Of 11 lectures publicized as available to watch on the school's event, only Barrett's was removed from YouTube.
After CNN inquired to obtain video of the event, a university spokesperson, Dennis K. Brown, told CNN, "We have checked with the organizer of the event [sic] have no information on what has become of the video of that lecture."
Several on-campus publications covered the event and Barrett's remarks at the time.
The Observer, Notre Dame's student newspaper, wrote that Barrett said, ''I think it is very unlikely at this point that the court is going to overturn Roe as curbed by [Planned Parenthood v.] Casey. The fundamental element, that the woman has a right to choose abortion, will probably stand," she said.
The Irish Rover, a student publication covering Catholic identity, quoted Barrett as saying, "whether or not Roe gets overturned is irrelevant," saying the question of abortion would return to the state level and could still be legal in certain states.
Anti-Biden letter
As Barrett gave talks on abortion to groups associated with the on-campus Right to Life groups, Barrett was also a member of the university's chapter of the University Faculty for Life from the group's founding in 2010 until 2016, according to her Senate paperwork.
While she was a member of the group, the group unanimously passed a resolution for a letter calling on the university to rescind an award given to then-Vice President Biden because of his beliefs on abortion.
"Notre Dame claims to award the Laetare Medal 'annually to an American Catholic in recognition of outstanding service to Church and society,'" the letter reads. "But our Faculty for Life Chapter agrees with Bishop Kevin Rhoades that the awarding of the Laetare Medal to Vice-President Biden is a scandalous violation of the University's moral responsibility (as the American bishops wrote in 2004) never to honor those who act in defiance of fundamental moral principles about the sanctity of life."
The faculty letter attacks Biden's position on abortion for not wanting to "impose" the Catholic Church's teachings on abortion upon a woman or a doctor, supporting the death penalty and for rejecting "the truth that human life begins at conception." It also states that public officials like Biden have "an especially grave duty to preserve" life.
The U.S. and the Vatican want to integrate chattel law in China.
Why?
Because it is so passe' to use the term assimilation.
Oh, and UNIDROIT et al is rewriting chattel law to create Corporate Parental Rights, or rather to recodify the hierarchy of human asset management to better maximize revenues in what the world is coming to see as modern human trafficking in the name of the tax exempt god.
People may conjure images of Native American christian boarding schools, whose histories are exclusively excluded from U.S. curriculae and literature, because, you know, if we preserved the legacies of this nation, I would not have to constantly document this crap covering up the residuals of the peculiar institution which is the Child Welfare System, for they only slapped a cross on the salvific plantations after the Emancipation Proclamation, because you have to be over the age of 15 years to qualify.
China has lots of people who make lots of babies the private corporations like to use to make those wonderful, magical pills to cure all your ills, researched and administrated by the Vatican.
Do not let me mention the revenue maximization possibilities of all those absolutely glorious churches, who shall evangelized that turn key Detroit transposable model of stealin' the children, land & vote, the same thing they did in Russia.
Since 2004, CRS has supported the development of the emerging social service sector in China, with a particular focus on providing care and support services for people with HIV and their families. CRS expanded in 2012 to include services for cancer patients and their families.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the number of cancer cases is rising “ferociously” in China. About 2.2 million people die every year from the disease. For men, the most commonly diagnosed form of the disease is lung cancer. For women, it is breast cancer. WHO says many deaths could be prevented, mainly by reducing the country’s very high smoking rates. There are more than 300 million smokers in China with more than half of all men as regular smokers. WHO says air pollution, particularly in urban areas, is also a contributing risk factor for cancer in China.
I wonder what will happen when the people do not want to accept the christian integration socioeconomic model when the find out it failed, miserably, in its first test pilot City of Detroit.
*awkward*
The evangelical corporate parental rights human asset forfeiture network is already up and running.
I want to know why Pompeo is engaging in private matters on behalf of private corporations like the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, who are the ones running all the child welfare contracts when it comes to trafficking tiny humans.
Is christian integration election interference or are we to stick with the more traditional evangelical term of gerrymandering?
Better yet, I want to know why Pompeo is touching anything dealing with Catholic Charities when he should be fully aware of a matter pending before SCOTUS on whether or not to terminate the right to keep and bear the arms of the United States on November 4, 2020, the day after the 2020 Presidential Election, which is based upon the Electoral Vote of Electors who cast ballots, and not the Popular Vote by Qualified Voters who vote for the Electors, who will constantly change the the vote, by blackmail or bribe of a foreign actor, rather a christian corporation, registered under a state seal, with foreign oaths of fealty, like Christ, but the children's trusts are a completely different subject matter in dealing with all that money laundering out the IOR, more readily recognized as the Vatican Bank, by and through DeutscheBank and GoldmanSachs, in the heavy presence of Detroit legal situations.
Summoning the souls for the resurrection of final judgement
Am I the only one who noticed the Pontifical Guard by each side of Jorge?
Jorge is summoning the souls through ancient mechanisms of Law & Order.
Consider prayers as legal petitions to the Highest Order because the lower orders, more intuitively recognized as "The Elected Ones" have been fucking up so you have to go snitch on the shit they have been doing to show that they need to have their arses snatched out those seats, to be tried in Mother Court of the jurisdiction district of where a grand jury has the right to vote on how to handle these vile creatures who have breached their oath of office and holders of the children's trust, the posterity of society.
Jorge is performing ancient acts of theurgy in summoning the souls for the resurrection, a legal act of final judgment in the form of due process called reparations for the act of terminating the parental right to keep and bear the arms of the United States, by and through the act of false claims, more intuitively understood as propaganda.
To be made whole is an obligation when the request has been made by the prayers of the extraordinary writs.
This is hot because removing a public official from office based upon lies is called blasphemy, a crime of the highest order of law.
Some know this as ethics, where there does exist due process because this from the ancients, meaning it is global.
The Vatican is the legal authority over the seals of the heavens, granted through the legal transfer of one's voice, in the public square, where one takes an oath of office.
That is why we have separation of church and state, it is just an oversight mechanism of checks and balances that has been bleachbitted from our histories and institutions.
Jorge is also letting the world know that the heavens are about to fall, where there shall be many who will be praying for their lives, for there shall be no more secrets...
It seems we have another passion of being christ-like between another set of two extremely amicable individuals in the exchange of money, in good faith, of course, in the execution of something for someone who was doing more christ-like passionate stuff to other tiny humans.
A pastoral play was long before radio and television.
You would have a troupe, speaking the common tongue of Romance, go town to town, putting on plays, centering on the life of Christ, as a promo to the latest commissioned Codex, by someone who has hired monks to write a really fancy pre-medieval Hollywood production, turning you into a future saint to be worshipped as your legacy, on how great you are to cover up all the wonderful things you probably should have never done.
It was called heraldry, the public record on the content of your character, by showing how great you are to bear the arms of the state to engage in commerce.
Today, it seems we have absolutely brilliant youtube investigative journalists who are cyberly bonding, having been exiled from most internet social platforms.
Then there was a codex, now there are online hoaxes, whereby both contain the letter "x" making them one in the same because cyber wars are real, but I digress.
Not really.
There shall be many, many more of these christ-like passions to come to fruition, because people get easily distracted with pretty shiny spectacularly salacious stories when it comes distracting from the unsealing of crimes against humanity.
Rome Newsroom, Oct 6, 2020 / 08:00 am MT (CNA).- Italian media reported this week that a woman
with a company based in Slovenia received at least half a million euros from the Vatican’s Secretariat of State in connection with Cardinal Angelo Becciu.
According to reports, the 39-year-old Cecilia Marogna, who is from Becciu’s home island of Sardinia, received 500,000 or 600,000 euros in payments from the Secretariat of State over four years.
Reports also claimed that the payments had been made to the Slovenia-based company Logsic, D.O.O., owned by Marogna.
In two interviews Oct. 6, Marogna rejected rumors that she was related to, or had any sort of inappropriate relationship with, the cardinal, but said she was paid the money as a salary for work she did as a diplomatic consultant and as reimbursement for travel and other related expenses.
Marogna did not deny reports that she had used the Vatican payments to buy luxury purses, but insisted it was for her work and that she personally lives modestly, renting an apartment and driving a 10-year-old car.
Italian television program Le Iene claimed Oct. 5 to have documents showing that the Secretariat of State had given half a million euros to Marogna’s Slovenian company and that she had “a relationship of trust” with Becciu.
The article was published as a teaser for the newest episode of the investigative program, which will air in Italy at 9:15pm Oct. 6.
Le Iene also claimed to have documents showing that Marogna used the Vatican money to buy expensive Prada and Chanel purses, as well as other luxury goods.
In an interview with Italian daily Domani Oct. 6, Marogna said people were writing critically about her “because I do my job well and I always maintain discretion and confidentiality.”
She said she worked for Becciu and the Secretariat of State building “high-level networks” in at-risk countries and areas such as the Middle East and Africa.
“I made a mapping of the missions, of the most remote dioceses. A job that the Vatican had never done: the nunciatures certainly do not report on geopolitics or analysis of data on the territory,” she claimed.
There are discrepancies from Marogna over whether she was paid 500,000 or 600,000 euros, but she stated that the money all went to her Vatican consultancy work and her salary; expensive gifts, such as trips or purses, “were used to create cooperative relationships,” she said.
“We are talking about a few hundred thousand euros spent in over four years,” Marogna said. “And the wire transfers my company received from the Vatican also included my salary. It’s not like I’m a missionary, sorry? Will I be able to get paid for the work I’ve done? Between travel and various payments, how much money can I have kept for myself? Think about it, come on.”
According to Marogna, she also used the money “for different operations,” and said her bank statements could show she has paid companies in Somalia.
“It is not that in some countries you go to pay sources with a debit card,” she said, adding that there were also London brokers involved.
Asked about “hypothetical covert operations to free kidnapped clergy,” Marogna responded: “I am aware of these situations. I may have had sensitive information about this, but it’s not like I was going to the terrorists to take the hostage.”
“I can speak with intermediaries to try to resolve situations. But I can also tell you that Becciu and I weren’t the only ones running certain businesses,” she said.
Marogna also insisted that the sums she received from the Vatican were not used to pay kidnapping ransoms and she was “not aware” that the Vatican had ever paid anything to criminal organizations, arguing that 600,000 euros was “small change” and would not be enough “to close any negotiations.”
She told the Corriere della Sera that she met Becciu after sending him an email in 2015 to see if he agreed with her analysis of security problems at Vatican nunciatures. In a different interview she said she knew he had previously been the nuncio to Angola.
The then-sostituto of the Secretariat of State met with her at the Vatican for an hour and a half and “a relationship of esteem was born that resulted in an operational collaboration,” she said.
According to Marogna, “there was a lack of parallel diplomacy in the North African and Middle Eastern countries, but I knew what to do and how to move, also to reduce the dangers deriving from the nunciatures and missions from the terrorist cells present in those countries.”
A court spokeswoman said the chief justice had fallen while walking for exercise and blamed dehydration.
WASHINGTON — Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. sustained a head injury last month that required a night at the hospital, a spokeswoman for the Supreme Court said on Tuesday.
“The chief justice was treated at a local hospital on June 21 for an injury to his forehead sustained in a fall while walking for exercise near his home,” the spokeswoman, Kathleen Arberg, said in a statement.
“The injury required sutures, and out of an abundance of caution, he stayed in the hospital overnight and was discharged the next morning,” Ms. Arberg said. “His doctors ruled out a seizure. They believe the fall was likely due to lightheadedness caused by dehydration.”
The incident was first reported by The Washington Post, which said it had made inquiries after receiving a tip that Chief Justice Roberts had been seen at a Maryland country club bleeding from his head.
Other members of the court, notably Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, have volunteered information about health setbacks requiring hospitalization. Chief Justice Roberts did not disclose his fall until The Post asked.
The chief justice has twice had seizures, in 1993 and 2007, but Ms. Arberg’s statement said his latest fall had not been caused by one.
The last seizure happened at the chief justice’s summer home in Maine. At the time, the court described the episode as a “benign idiopathic seizure,” one that could be a sign of epilepsy. The incident was similar to one he experienced 14 years before, the court’s news release at the time said. Idiopathic means that the cause of the seizure remained unknown.
Chief Justice Roberts is 65 and appeared to be in vigorous good health when the court last heard arguments in March.
The chief justice has been busy, as the court has been working to issue major decisions in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic. He has emerged this term as the median justice, casting the decisive votes in all of the court’s closely divided decisions, including ones on L.G.B.T.Q. rights, young immigrants known as Dreamers and abortion.
The court is expected to issue its final five decisions of the term in the coming days. They include cases on whether President Trump can block the release of financial records sought by Congress and by New York prosecutors.
Where is the Certificate of Oath, with the Great Seal of the United States, Signed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States? #Sealsmatter
Section 1. The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same term, be elected, as follows:
Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector. The electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves. And they shall make a list of all the persons voted for, and of the number of votes for each; which list they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be counted. The person having the greatest number of votes shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such majority, and have an equal number of votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately choose by ballot one of them for President; and if no person have a majority, then from the five highest on the list the said House shall in like manner choose the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by States, the representation from each state having one vote; A quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. In every case, after the choice of the President, the person having the greatest number of votes of the electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal votes, the Senate shall choose from them by ballot the Vice President....unless those electors engaged in election interference fraud schemes like stealin' the children, land & vote through what is called gerrymandering, through a political party who has had its parental rights to keep and bear the arms of the United States, as a registered business entity, terminated, making any casting of the vote and tally to be illegitimate because, as a nullified entity, there are no duly existing quorum, the 2016 vote was fraudulently certified through the Secretaries of State, all the way down to the City Clerks, like what was done in Detroit, in Wayne County, by its Secretary of State, who filed the fake ass Michigan certification of the 2016 election with the Clerk of the House in that fake ass 2016 Special Election, which means Trump is not duly elected, hence he is illegitimate, where the Senate, U.S. Attorney General, and Chief Justice of SCOTUS, who administered the fake ass oath of Donald J. Trump, because his real legal name is Donald John Trump, and they all know it, because McGahn and the JonesDay crew made sure to cloak the foreign invasion of Detroit and is about to sell Trump down the river in another round of the 202 fake ass election.
The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors, and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States.
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States....there are no electors for the Democratic National Committee nor the Republican National Committee because their fake all LLCs and backdoor inc. were dissolved, December 2015 and everyone covered it up because they are covering up the residuals of the peculiar institution, which is child welfare, the trafficking of tiny humans.
Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee as his last two opponents, Ted Cruz and John Kasich, dropped out of the race. Running against the Democratic Party’s candidate, former First Lady Hillary Clinton, Trump won a number of critical “Rust Belt” states and was elected the 45th U.S. President on November 8, 2016. Trump took the oath of office on January 20, 2017 in Washington, D.C.
Offered is President Trump’s signature, in blue marker, on a typewritten copy of the Oath of Office, dated January 20, 2017 on White House stationary. The 8½ x 11-inch white sheet has “Memorandum The White House Washington” in blue type across the top of the page, with the date and oath in bold black type. Trump’s signature is on the lower third of the page. The sheet has blue ink on the top edge. Trump was administered the oath by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on the steps of the U.S. Capital. This comes with a LOA from Beckett Authentication. https://goldinauctions.com/Donald_Trump_Signed_Presidential_Oath_of_Office__B-LOT56879.aspx
{My apologies for bringing you with me into one of my Post Traumatic Fraud Disorder Episodes, but I had flashbacks when it came to forging names of elected officials behind their backs, or having them sign documents under false advisement, or Chiefs of Staff and anyone else who has sold the signatures of Members of Congress and the White House, for about the same price range......, but hey, what do I know....}
The President shall, at stated times, receive for his services, a compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that period any other emolument from the United States, or any of them....wherefore this doctrine of emolument also applies to his cabinet, Chiefs of Staff, White House counsel, and campaign, like JonesDay, including the Vice President and CIA Director because they all have foreign corporations who raped Detroit in TARP through the act of gerrymandering, otherwise known as stealin' the children, land & vote, by executing an international coup in a well funded insurrection, to remove a sitting member of congress and U.S. icon, like they are tearing down statues, bleachbitting history, in foreign titles of lands, under a crown.
In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President, and such officer shall act accordingly, until the disability be removed, or a President shall be elected....if there exists what is called a tacit resignation, then, in the converse, there must also exist a tacit election, where tacit means, in this instance, someone lied, making Obama, the Archpresident, transposing Ecclesiastic models of juridic persons, under the Second Amendment, where, it may be a situation of Trump being the Archtreasury, or, as I prefer, the keeper of the children's trust.
Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Section 2. The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.
He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.....unless the president was not duly elected and is illegitimate because there are no valid certifications throughout the entire electoral process, making any appointments and executive orders such as this, nullified.
The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.
Section 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.
Section 4. The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors....for falsely advising the President, because Chief Justice of SCOTUS John Roberts condoned the bad faith of the policy in his own breach of his oath of office, in failing to uphold the public policy of insurance to protect and serve the people in justice, which means not to procure and purvey tiny humans as lab rats, in Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare, by promulgating the residuals of the peculiar institution, by allowing Trump to continue to be falsely advised.
Trump was falsely advised in the christian invasion of the United States through Religious Freedom Restoration Act, where the church is supposed to be the authority over the oaths of offices to protect the posterity of the nation, rather the best interests of the child, whereby the Vice President and all civil officers shall fall from the heavens, under the Second Amendment, which is why I am pacified.
See, how that all works out?
The USCCB is supposed to be the watchers over the oaths of office for the people, hence, the doctrine of separation, except when it comes to the Thirteenth Exception, strictly for the purposes of maximizing revenues, because it is illegal for a not for profit office holder to generate profit from the selling of tiny humans.
This Executive Order is entered into the public record, for the purposes of obviation of the congress, as a fraud, because the data cited in this are false, or rather, fake, fake, fake.
#maytheheavensfall
Executive Order on Strengthening the Child Welfare System for America’s Children
LAW & JUSTICE
Issued on: June 24, 2020
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. Every child deserves a family. Our States and communities have both a legal obligation, and the privilege, to care for our Nation’s most vulnerable children.
The best foster care system is one that is not needed in the first place. My Administration has been focused on prevention strategies that keep children safe while strengthening families so that children do not enter foster care unnecessarily. Last year, and for only the second time since 2011, the number of children in the foster care system declined, and for the third year in a row, the number of children entering foster care has declined.
We no longer "sell" children because the Great Thirteenth Exception affords, through federal funding, that, we, the holders of not-for-profit and for-profit corporate offices, to "procure and purvey" tiny humans through human asset management databases in the name of the tax exempt god.
But challenges remain. Too many young people who are in our foster care system wait years before finding the permanency of family. More than 400,000 children are currently in foster care. Of those, more than 124,000 children are waiting for adoption, with nearly 6 out of 10 (58.4 percent) having already become legally eligible for adoption.
More than 50 percent of the children waiting for adoption have been in foster care — without the security and constancy of a permanent family — for 2 years or more. The need for stability and timely permanency is particularly acute for children 9 years and older, children in sibling groups, and those with intellectual or physical disabilities.
Even worse, too many young men and women age out of foster care having never found a permanent, stable family. In recent years, approximately 20,000 young people have aged out of foster care each year in the United States. Research has shown that young people who age out of the foster care system are likely to experience significant, and significantly increased, life challenges — 40 percent of such young people studied experienced homelessness; 50 percent were unemployed at age 24; 25 percent experienced post-traumatic stress disorder; and 71 percent became pregnant by age 21. These are unacceptable outcomes.
Several factors have contributed to the number of children who wait in foster care for extended periods. First, State and local child welfare agencies often do not have robust partnerships with private community organizations, including faith-based organizations. Second, those who step up to be resource families for children in foster care — including kin, guardians, foster parents, and adoptive parents — may lack adequate support. Third, too often the processes and systems meant to help children and families in crisis have instead created bureaucratic barriers that make it more difficult for these children and families to get the help they need.
It is the goal of the United States to promote a child welfare system that reduces the need to place children into foster care; achieves safe permanency for those children who must come into foster care, and does so more quickly and more effectively; places appropriate focus on children who are waiting for adoption, especially those who are 9 years and older, are in sibling groups, or have disabilities; and decreases the proportion of young adults who age out of the foster care system.
Always remember, DACA is a policy, not a law! Only congress makes law, not the executive branch, unless there is an exception for an unduly elected president to elucidate gerrymanding, but, hey, what do I know?
Children from all backgrounds have the potential to become successful and thriving adults. Yet without a committed, loving family that can provide encouragement, stability, and a lifelong connection, some children may never receive the support needed to realize that potential.
This order will help to empower families who answer the call to open their hearts and homes to children who need them. My Administration is committed to helping give as many children as possible the stability and support that family provides by dramatically improving our child welfare system.
Sec. 2. Encouraging Robust Partnerships Between State Agencies and Public, Private, Faith-based, and Community Organizations. (a) In order to facilitate close partnerships between State agencies and nongovernmental organizations, including public, private, faith-based, and community groups, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) shall provide increased public access to accurate, up-to-date information relevant to strengthening the child welfare system, including by:
(i) Publishing data to aid in the recruitment of community support. Within 1 year of the date of this order and each year thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, a report that provides information about typical patterns of entry, recent available counts of children in foster care, and counts of children waiting for adoption. To the extent appropriate and consistent with applicable law, including all privacy laws, this data will be disaggregated by county or other sub-State level, child age, placement type, and prior time in care.
(ii) Collecting needed data to preserve sibling connections.
(A) Within 2 years of the date of this order, the Secretary shall collect information from appropriate State and local agencies on the number of children in foster care who have siblings in foster care and who are not currently placed with their siblings.
(B) Within 3 years of the date of this order, to support the goal of keeping siblings together (42 U.S.C. 671(a)(31)(A)), the Secretary shall develop data analysis methods to report on the experience of children entering care in sibling groups, and the extent to which they are placed together. The Secretary’s analysis shall also assess the extent to which siblings who are legally eligible for adoption achieve permanency together.
(iii) Expanding the number of homes for children and youth.
(A) Within 2 years of the date of this order, the Secretary shall develop a more rigorous and systematic approach to collecting State administrative data as part of the Child and Family Services Review required by section 1123A of the Social Security Act (the “Act”) (42 U.S.C. 1320a–2a). Data collected shall include:
(1) demographic information for children in foster care and waiting for adoption;
(2) the number of currently available foster families and their demographic information;
(3) the average foster parent retention rate and average length of time foster parents remain certified;
(4) a target number of foster homes needed to meet the needs of children in foster care; and
(5) the average length of time it takes to complete foster and adoptive home certification.
(B) The Secretary shall ensure, to the extent consistent with applicable law, that States report to the Secretary regarding strategies for coordinating with nongovernmental organizations, including faith-based and community organizations, to recruit and support foster and adoptive families.
(b) Within 1 year of the date of this order, the Secretary shall issue guidance to Federal, State, and local agencies on partnering with nongovernmental organizations. This guidance shall include best practices for information sharing, providing needed services to families to support prevention of children entering foster care, family preservation, foster and adoptive home recruitment and retention, respite care, post-placement family support, and support for older youth. This guidance shall also make clear that faith-based organizations are eligible for partnerships under title IV-E of the Act (42 U.S.C. 670 et seq.), on an equal basis, consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution.
Sec. 3. Improving Access to Adequate Resources for Caregivers and Youth. While many public, private, faith based, and community resources and other sources of support exist, many American caregivers still lack connection with and access to adequate resources. Within 1 year of the date of this order, the Secretary shall equip caregivers and those in care to meet their unique challenges, by:
(a) Expanding educational options. To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall use all existing technical assistance resources to promote dissemination and State implementation of the National Training and Development Curriculum, including, when appropriate, in non-classroom environments.
(b) Increasing the availability of trauma-informed training. The Secretary shall provide an enhanced, web-based, learning-management platform to house the information generated by the National Adoption Competency Mental Health Training Initiative. Access to this web-based training material will be provided free of charge for all child welfare and mental health practitioners.
(c) Supporting guardianship. The Secretary shall provide information to States regarding the importance and availability of funds to increase guardianship through the title IV-E Guardianship Assistance Program (42 U.S.C. 673), which provides Federal reimbursement for payments to guardians and for associated administrative costs. This information shall include which States have already opted into the program.
(d) Enhancing support for kinship care and youth exiting foster care. The Secretary shall establish a plan to address barriers to accessing existing Federal assistance and benefits for eligible individuals.
Sec. 4. Ensuring Equality of Treatment and Access for all Families. The Howard M. Metzenbaum Multiethnic Placement Act of 1994 (the “Multiethnic Placement Act”) (Public Law 103-382), as amended, prohibits agencies from denying to any person the opportunity to become an adoptive or a foster parent on the basis of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. 671(a)(18)(A)); prohibits agencies from delaying or denying the placement of a child for adoption or into foster care on the basis of race, color, or national origin (id. 671(a)(18)(B)); and requires agencies to diligently recruit a diverse base of foster and adoptive parents to better reflect the racial and ethnic makeup of children in out-of-home care (id. 662(b)(7)). To further the goals of the Multiethnic Placement Act, the Secretary shall:
(a) within 6 months of the date of this order, initiate a study regarding the implementation of these requirements nationwide;
(b) within 1 year of the date of this order, update guidance, as necessary, regarding implementation of the Multiethnic Placement Act; and
(c) within 1 year of the date of this order, publish guidance regarding the rights of parents, prospective parents, and children with disabilities (including intellectual, developmental, or physical disabilities).
Sec. 5. Improving Processes to Prevent Unnecessary Removal and Secure Permanency for Children. (a) Federal Review of Reasonable Effort Determinations and Timeliness Requirements.
(i) Within 2 years of the date of this order, the Secretary shall require that both the title IV-E reviews conducted pursuant to 45 CFR 1356.71 and the Child and Family Services Reviews conducted pursuant to 45 CFR 1355.31–1355.36 specifically and adequately assess the following requirements:
(A) reasonable efforts to prevent removal;
(B) filing a petition for Termination of Parental Rights within established statutory timelines and court processing of such petition, unless statutory exemptions apply;
(C) reasonable efforts to finalize permanency plans; and
(D) completion of relevant required family search and notifications and how such efforts are reviewed by courts.
(ii) In cases in which it is determined that statutorily required timelines and efforts have not been satisfied, the Secretary shall make use of existing authority in making eligibility determinations and disallowances consistent with section 1123A(b)(3)(4) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a-2a(b)(3)(4)).
(iii) Within 2 years of the date of this order, the Secretary shall develop metrics to track permanency outcomes in each State and measure State performance over time.
(iv) Within 6 months of the date of this order, the Secretary shall provide guidance to States regarding flexibility in the use of Federal funds to support and encourage high-quality legal representation for parents and children, including pre-petition representation, in their efforts to prevent the removal of children from their families, safely reunify children and parents, finalize permanency, and ensure that their voices are heard and their rights are protected. The Secretary shall also ensure collection of data regarding State use of Federal funds for this purpose.
(b) Risk and Safety Assessments.
(i) Within 18 months of the date of this order, the Secretary shall collect States’ individual standards for conducting risk and safety assessments required under section 106(b)(2)(B)(iv) of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5106(b)(2)(B)(iv)).
(ii) Within 2 years of the date of this order, the Secretary shall outline reasonable best practice standards for risk and safety assessments, including how to address domestic violence and substance abuse.
Sec. 6. Indian Child Welfare Act. Nothing in this order shall alter the implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act or replace the tribal consultation process.
Sec. 7. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
There shall be no reconciliation. This shall be no insurrection.
These vile creatures took out an elected official, over all their authority to challenge, as a coup against the United States, and not one person has yet to figure out how this all started.
You were really, uber, mean to my Sweetie.
I await your arrival in Detroit, and, this, is, my Dearies, is my message to Rob. May the heavens fall. May the heavens fall. May the heavens fall. Thrice sayeth me, So, mote it be.
Catholic Charities executive director Rob McCann facetiously says his life was “ruined” by volunteer experiences with campus ministry and the Jesuit Volunteer Corps (JVC).
Rob McCann
He went to college thinking he would go to law school and be an attorney in New York City like others in his family.
His plans were diverted by volunteer work through campus ministry at local shelters and a two-month summer program with Jesuit Social Services in Ecuador, and by his involvement with the Jesuit Volunteer Corps both teaching migrant kindergarten children in Woodburn, Ore., and doing community outreach in Torreon, Mexico, and East Los Angeles.
By “ruined,” he means “transformed.”
“It’s easy to live life and not know how others live, but once you become aware of people who live in poverty, suffer and lack basic human dignity, it changes how you look at life,” he said. “Once you have that moment, you can choose to ignore what it means or to be part of the solution.”
His choice to be part of the solution meant that in September 2005, he succeeded Donna Hanson, who was executive director of Catholic Charities in Spokane for 27 years and who mentored him in his work as associate director since 2000.
In his new role, he fosters opportunities for volunteers—based on their comfort levels and skills—at House of Charity, St. Margaret’s Shelter, St. Anne’s Child and Family Center, and 62 other Catholic Charities’ programs in Eastern Washington. Perhaps he helps disrupt and transform some other lives, changing people and their outlooks.
After graduating from Fairfield University in Connecticut in 1991 with a degree in American studies and political science, Rob spent two years with the JVC.
“I had opportunities to see how the rest of the world lives and felt I needed to do something about it,” he said.
His first step was to earn a master’s degree in organizational leadership at Gonzaga in 1995. Then, while he was young, single and could fit all his belongings into the back of a car, he wanted overseas experience.
For several years, he was a program evaluator with the Catholic Relief Services’ Harvest of Hope Program, traveling to 31 countries—including Bosnia, Rwanda and Kosovo.
Catholic Relief Services is an international disaster relief and development agency, serving some of the most poverty-stricken areas of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.
In 1997 in India, he worked with and learned from Mother Teresa.
Through CRS, he visited agricultural programs, mother-child programs, health programs, refugee camps, water projects and other programs. Along with tips for success for each country program he visited, Rob developed a list of the top 10 mistakes learned in other countries. He reported back to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and CRS headquarters in Baltimore.
“I saw similar programs in different countries,” he said. “In Sudan, I might share with local staff how an Angolan community does a water project. Knowing what worked elsewhere helped people gain expertise.”
Rob went as a colleague, recognizing also that every country and culture does programs in different ways, and evaluating programs in light of the culture.
“What works in the mother-child program in Cambodia might not work in Senegal because of different family traditions, expectations, languages and tribal dynamics,” he said.
In Spokane, Rob also deals with the diverse cultures of chronically mentally ill people or children from families of different cultures.
Donna hired him in 2000 as associate director to oversee construction of two new homeless shelters and St. Anne’s Children and Family Center.
While working at Catholic Charities in Spokane, he completed a doctoral degree in leadership studies at Gonzaga University in 2004. He met and married his wife, Rachel, in 2001. They now have a one-year-old son, Timothy James.
As associate director, he would oversee programs, write grants, secure accreditation and do many other tasks, mentored by Donna.
“I learned the nuts-and-bolts details of how programs ran from the ‘global’ perspective of seeing the picture of the overall organization,” he said.
“Catholic Charities focuses on the core values of respect, compassion, collaboration and justice. Those words are visible in our facilities—the mission statements on the walls,” he said. “We make decisions through these four lenses. Volunteers and staff are to live these values, to walk the talk.”
Having grown up in a Catholic family with Catholic education from kindergarten through PhD, he said faith is a “big piece” of what he does at Catholic Charities.
Being Catholic, however, does not limit the scope of service, because service is provided based on “need not creed.” About 85 percent of staff and of those served are not Catholic.
McCann
Rob says Catholic Charities looks at the core values of faith traditions.
“We look at the core values of the Catholic tradition, values shared by most other traditions—Buddhist, Muslim, Jewish and other faiths, as well as other Christian,” he said, returning to the four basic values.
More than 90 years ago, Catholics in Eastern Washington wanted to respond to the poverty they saw. Farmers, bankers and other business people started Catholic Charities in this diocese to do that, he said.
“We exist in their name to serve anyone in need as a nonprofit, faith-based organization operating on the core values of the Gospel,” Rob said.
In accordance with a previous requirement for non-profits and faith-based organizations receiving federal, state or local funding, there is no evangelism component.
“There are times evangelism is appropriate and times when it is not appropriate. It is not appropriate in programs we run, programs based on the unconditional love of the Gospel, whether people accept Christ or don’t,” he said.
“If someone is hungry, cold or homeless, that person wants a meal, a blanket and warm shelter, not necessarily religion,” Rob said.
“Creed is the impetus for how and why we care, but it does not mandate who we serve. My faith tradition led me into this work, allows me to process it and gives me passion to do it.
“In my read of Catholicism, we are called to serve people in need, if we are to walk the path Christ walked. I learned through Jesuit spirituality and the Jesuit motto of ‘contemplatives in action,’” he said.
“Catholic Charities measures outcomes of its service of about 50,000 people a year based on their becoming more stable, healthier, happier and more self sufficient because of the programs. Some will lead better lives. Some may not, but we hope that all we serve will at least live in more dignity.
“Some have slept at House of Charity for 20 years and may sleep there 20 more years—in dignity. Some may be assisted to leave and become homeowners or move into stable housing.
“We meet people where they are, sit down with them and ask how they are doing and what they need. Then we design a program of action and assistance for them,” Rob said. “People have to be interested in bettering themselves. Some are not ready and may need basic human respect before they will want to make changes in their lives.”
Parishes, women religious, Jesuits, other nonprofits, other denominations and faith communities partner with Catholic Charities. The non-Catholic volunteer base has grown and the non-Catholic donor base has tripled.
“People know we reach all kinds of people,” Rob said.
“Like any nonprofit, we live year to year on city, state, federal, donor and grant funds. We live on faith,” he said. “Over our 90-year history, we have had years of ups and downs with changes in laws and grants.
“We are healthy, do good work and are accountable for funds donated, which inspires more giving,” he commented.
Beyond the current political talk of “faith-based initiatives,” Rob said the government has long channeled funds to serve the poor through Catholic Charities and similar organizations: “Now it’s a buzz word and spin on what has been happening for years.
“Catholic Charities is the biggest social-service provider in the country. Government funds are essential for us to do our job,” he said. “We have respected, in receiving those funds, the original requirement of providing the services without overt evangelism. We will not change our stance of serving all people, regardless of their religious beliefs.
“Everyone is a child of God and deserves unconditional love and dignity. As a civilization, we will not be judged by the money in our banks, our technology or the number of skyscrapers, but by how we treat the weakest people among us,” he said. “History judges a civilization by the quality of its relationships and how people act to end injustice.”
So along with helping people in need, Catholic Charities educates people so they are aware of and act on the relationship between Catholic social justice teachings and institutional injustice. The Parish Social Services office does the education and advocacy piece with Catholic Relief Services.
Reflecting on the growing needs, Rob said Catholic Charities seeks to expand its capacity to respond.
Over his 15 years in social services, he has seen needs continue to grow.
“I wish there were fewer homeless and hungry people. Our goal should be to close programs for a lack of need,” he said.
Catholic Charities has about 8,000 volunteers, more every year. It has 220 staff, compared to 63 five years ago. The new staff fill roles in the new, expanded facilities for the House of Charity, St. Margaret’s and St. Anne’s, which have tripled the capacity of Catholic Charities to serve the region.
The House of Charity grew from 38 to 109 beds. St. Margaret’s grew from room for four families to room for 18. The old St. Anne’s Child and Family Center served 18 children, and the new facility serves 200.
Catholic Charities has added more farm-worker housing in Othello and Pasco. The agency also has 700 housing units for seniors and families throughout Eastern Washington.
President and CEO
Rob joined Catholic Charities in 2000 and has served as ED since 2005. Prior experience includes 4 years with Catholic Relief Services as Project Mgr, Development Director, and Internal Auditor; 2 years as a Jesuit Volunteer in Oregon and Mexico; and one year in East LA as a Youth Advocate in Gang Alternative Programming. Rob is currently a Board Member and past Chair of the USCCB - National Advisory Board.
He also serves on various community boards, including Providence Health Care, SHMC
Foundation, Jesuit Volunteers Corps Northwest, Nazareth Guild, and Spokane County United Way.
Catholic Charities, which runs the city’s largest homeless shelter and has built hundreds of permanent homes for chronically homeless people, aggressively pushed back against what it deemed “some very serious misstatements that have been floating around in the community.”
Rob McCann, president of Catholic Charities Spokane, said flyers have been passed around near the House of Charity listing numerous lies about the shelter, crime associated with it and plans his organization has to build more housing. A separate petition seeking to “get control of the 1,000 people we already have” before Catholic Charities is allowed to build more housing has also circulated and gathered signatures.
At a hastily called news conference, McCann said they’ve known of the flyer and petition for more than two months but only felt compelled to dispel the rumors this week, for reasons he did not explain.
The flyer is a list of grievances filled with numerous assumptions and outright lies, McCann said.
Under a header called “Known Facts,” it states that “homeless are trying to get hit by driving cars,” “overnighters have been raped” and “police are not allowed inside” Catholic Charities’ facilities. It also said the organization planned to build “a Spokane slum empire” with 9,000 units for a “small army” of homeless people.
McCann, who is incorrectly referred to as Rob McKenna in the flyer, characterized the points on the flyers as “factually inaccurate,” but didn’t’ give them a “second thought.”
He did have something to say about the petition calling for his group to stop building housing for the chronically homeless.
“Here’s the spoiler: We’re not going to do that,” he said, noting construction of two new buildings with 50 units each would begin this fall, part of a long-term plan to build up to 800 units of permanent housing for chronically homeless people.
At the news conference, McCann gave a nearly point-by-point refutation of the flyer.
The flyer says that drugs and weapons are allowed in the House of Charity.
“First and foremost, weapons and drugs are not allowed in the House of Charity,” McCann said. “However, it’s a low-demand shelter. We take anybody in any condition, which means we take people who are still actively using, actively drinking, may not be on their meds with mental health issues, and with that population does sometimes come some illegal substances and weapons. But they’re not allowed in the House of Charity. We have strict rules about that.”
The flyer says that rapes have occurred in the shelter.
“That is completely untrue,”McCann said. “We do not have any knowledge of any such activity at the House of Charity. Certainly we would know about it if it happened.”
The flyer says police are not allowed in the shelter.
“The police are always welcome at the House of Charity,” McCann said. “The police are our number one collaborators and partners in Spokane. Without them, we could not do this work. We are blessed with an amazing police department in the city of Spokane. They give a level of patience and understanding to this population that they don’t always earn and deserve.”
The flyer says Catholic Charities plans to build 9,000 units for the homeless population.
“I wish,” McCann said. “That would be great if we could build 9,000 units for the homeless in this community.”
He pointed out that Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle combined don’t have that much permanent housing for the homeless.
The flyer said Catholic Charities’ housing developments are a “slum empire,” which McCann said was not only offensive, but also wrong.
“These are not slums. These are the nicest buildings on the blocks in most cases,” he said of his group’s buildings, such as the Father Bach Haven and Donna Hanson Haven. “The word ‘slum’ is just a really negative, unfair term.”
McCann acknowledged the shelter did have problems, but noted it was built to shelter 109 homeless men and has in recent months sheltered upward of 400 “men, women, couples, service animals and everything in between. That has put a great stress on our neighborhood and our block.”
McCann said he hasn’t seen any instances of violence against homeless people inspired by the flyer and petition but said a man, “likely the same individual who did this flyer,” has entered Catholic Charities’ buildings and filmed clients and residents without permission.
He said other people have experienced “emotional and verbal trauma as a result of being berated.”
Finally, McCann said about 85 percent of Spokane’s chronically homeless population suffer from mental health and substance abuse issues, making them a “very fragile, delicate population.” He asked for patience from the greater community.
“Certainly when you’re struggling with mental health and substance abuse, you’re not always making the best decisions, nor would any of us in this room if we were suffering with mental health and substance abuse,” he said. “We will never, ever apologize for the work of serving the poor at Catholic Charities.”
