Showing posts with label quo warranto. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quo warranto. Show all posts

Friday, August 14, 2020

By Law & Order - DHS, GAO & OIG Transposable Model Of Armiger

By what right do you hold the public trust of office?

Is it time for those extraordinary writs in questioning armiger?

Me thinketh so.

There is a hierarchic structure in the heavens, and when the administration of justice is usurped, by the most nefariously, dubious means and methods, the heavens must fall, in order of law.

#maytheheavensfall



GAO finds acting DHS chief Chad Wolf, deputy Cuccinelli invalidly appointed to posts

GAO said it was referring the matter to the department's inspector general

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Friday said that the appointments of acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf and acting Deputy Ken Cuccinelli were made invalidly -- raising questions about the legality of decisions made during their tenures.

“Because the incorrect official assumed the title of Acting Secretary at that time, subsequent amendments to the order of succession made by that official were invalid and officials who assumed their positions under such amendments, including Chad Wolf and Kenneth Cuccinelli, were named by reference to an invalid order of succession,” the report, by Congress' investigative body, concluded.

The GAO investigated how the Trump administration filled posts at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) without Senate confirmation.

It found that, when then-DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned in April 2019, the order of succession dictated that it should have been the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) who took over. Instead, President Trump appointed Kevin McAleenan -- who was then the head of Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

The opinion found that DHS mistakenly referred to regulations that spelled out the process for a disaster or catastrophic emergency, rather than an executive order that governed the typical order of succession.

“Mr. McAleenan would have been the appropriate official had Secretary Nielsen been unavailable to act during a disaster or catastrophic emergency. That was not the case here,” the report said.

Before he resigned, McAleenan revised the process to allow combine the two processes -- allowing Wolf and Cuccinelli to be appointed. But, the GAO found, because McAleenan was invalidly appointed, so were the changes he made to the order of succession.

“As such, Mr. McAleenan did not have the authority to amend the Secretary’s existing designation. Accordingly, Messrs. Wolf and Cuccinelli were named to their respective positions of Acting Secretary and Senior Official Performing the Duties of Deputy Secretary by reference to an invalid order of succession, it said.

“We wholeheartedly disagree with the GAO’s baseless report and plan to issue a formal response to this shortly," a DHS spokesperson told Fox News.

The opinion is not binding but is likely to raise questions about the legality of decisions made by Wolf and Cuccinelli during their times at head of the department since taking their posts in November last year -- questions likely to be seized on by those who oppose the Trump administration's tough actions on illegal immigration and its crackdown on violence against federal property in Portland.

GAO said it was not reviewing the legality of the actions taken by the officials and is instead referring it to the department's inspector general.

Under Wolf, the department has taken a number of moves to crack down on illegal immigration at the border and has made a number of agreements with countries south of the border to step the flow of migrants -- including a series of asylum cooperative agreements (ACA) with Northern Triangle countries.

Recently, Wolf’s DHS also ramped up federal presence in Portland and other cities in response to violence aimed at federal property. Federal law enforcement recently agreed with Oregon officials to scale back presence in Portland as long as the federal courthouse officers had been protecting could be kept safe.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, March 23, 2020

Brenda Jones v. Rashida Tlaib - #MeToo Takes A Dark Turn In Detroit

Yes, Nancy Pelosi and her rogue ass crew are prepared to throw Rashida Tlaib under the bus.

Yes, they planned it which is probably why Brenda Jones won the 2018 Special Election and Rashida won the 2018 General Election for the Michigan 13th Congressional District.

Cocktails & Popcorn: Nancy Pelosi Is Prepared To Throw The #MeToo Girls Under The Bus - In Detroit

Ian Conyers wanted to run in the 2020 election, but that is not going to happen because he was mean to my Sweetie.

Brenda Jones, Mayor Pro Tem of Detroit City Council, sits on the Election Commission, who certifies elections.

Brenda refused to resign from City Council when she ran as a congressional candidate, but had no problem certifying her own election, when that election was riddled with incompetence in administration, fraud, and your basic espionage, making her illegitimately elected for that 8 day period in D.C.

Then, in the same breath of that same 2018 election, Brenda certified the election for Rashida, who is also unduly elected.

This means the entire Michigan 2018 election is nullified, if only there was due process.

This also means the 2016 election is nullified because she certified that jacked up election, too, and never once allowed all the complaints due process.

As Detroit carried the State of Michigan in elections, having the highest concentration of voters in the state, Governor Gretchen Whitmer is also unduly elected, but, hey, what do I know?

I know Trump continues to obstruct justice by keeping those IG Reports in his backpocket.

So the moral of the story is.... Do not be mean to my Sweetie.

#maytheheavensfall

Brenda Jones files papers suggesting she's running against Rep. Rashida Tlaib

WASHINGTON — Detroit City Council President Brenda Jones appears to be running for Congress again this year, though she hasn't made any formal announcement.

On Saturday, a political tracking website called Poltics1.com posted on Twitter that Jones, who lost a close race to U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, in 2018, had filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission indicating she is a candidate in 2020.

The paperwork was dated Wednesday.

Former state Sen. Ian Conyers, D-Detroit, who also ran against Jones and Tlaib for the Democratic nomination to Michigan's 13th Congressional District, noted Jones' apparent entry into the race on his own feed on Twitter, saying it was "great news" for the district.

MI CD-13. Detroit City Council Pres Brenda Jones (D), who narrowly lost 2018 primary to now-freshman Cong Rashida Tlaib (D), has filed amended FEC paperwork indicating she is planning 2020 rematch primary run vs Tlaib.

https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/651/202003189203868651/202003189203868651.pdf

Jones' own campaign website and Twitter feed were silent on her possible aspirations, however.

Two years ago, Jones lost in the Democratic primary in the predominantly Democratic district to Tlaib, a former state representative and civil rights lawyer, by 900 votes — about 1% of the total — to be the nominee for the full two-year term in Congress beginning January 2019.

That race, however, included a crowded field of six candidates that split the vote, causing some analysts to believe that if the field had been more narrow, Jones' chances would have been better.

That expectation was supported by the fact that in a somewhat smaller four-person field in the race to succeed former U.S. Rep. John Conyers, D-Detroit, for a two-month partial term, Jones beat Tlaib by about 2%, or 1,648 votes, and ended up serving briefly in Congress herself at the end of 2018.

Jones has been a member of City Council since 2005 and entered the nomination fight in 2018 as a potential front-runner, having the backing of Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan and establishment Democrats. But Tlaib put together an aggressive campaign, raising more money than Jones.

Tlaib may be an even more formidable candidate now, having thrust herself into the national spotlight with early calls for President Donald Trump's impeachment and becoming a campaign surrogate for Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont in his run for the Democratic presidential nomination.

If Jones is running, she will have until 4 p.m. April 21 to file at least 1,000 valid signatures from the district in support of her candidacy. While it is not normally difficult to get that number of signatures, efforts to collect them this year could potentially be made more challenging by the spread of coronavirus.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, March 13, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown: Emergency Manager Emperor Pence & His Procurement Consortia Task Force Advise Trump To Declare National Emergency

The Sordid Tale Of Michigan Privatization: From Emergency Manager To Russia

Emergency Manager Emperor Pence and his crackerjack Procurement Consortia Task Force came out like they are about to pull the ole "Et tu, Brutus" move on Trump.

One reason why we are witnessing complete and utter chaos is because the Procurement Consortia Task Force had to book facilities, caterers, hotels, entertainment, you know, the things the private, foreign, corporate partners in commerce do when managing the humans of the United States do.

RDC - Smart Screening
https://rdc.com/
Trump is correct in calling Emergency Manager Emperor Pence  & his band of merry corporate marauders, 'Geniuses', because we are dealing with the work of "Legal Geniuses", (trademark pending).



CMS is issuing blanket waivers on nursing homes regulation.

That sounds like human asset management for the civil debt of health care.

Ontario and Michigan have indicated that they have child welfare operations to protect the children, you know, like Child Protective Services does because they need the contracts.

It seems their trafficking tiny humans financial networks are having a bit of challenges in maintaining their assets, being seized, and all, but hey, what do I know?

I know this is nothing but the transposable model of the Michigan Emergency Manager, which is how I know what they are doing, because it is all the same people, and they were running the first Procurement Consortia Task Force with the Detroit Economic Club, birthed out the Detroit Bankruptcy.

Yami-Gucci, the Haitian Hood Rat got called out, hard, I must say with a distinct pleasure!

Now, comes the stimulus so when the health care bailout comes, no one will challenge it, because everyone was so happy with the stimulus, just like they did with TARP - keep them dumb, fat & happy.

Remember, April is Child Abuse Propaganda Month and the U.S Census is afoot...or was, I have no idea when the census will be put on hiatus but testing kits are great vehicles when building a privatized genetic database.

Trump is under false advisement to stop the heavens from falling, but it is too late.

#maytheheavensfall

Stafford Act by lisacot on Scribd
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, March 12, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown: Emergency Manager Emperor Pence & His Procurement Consortia Task Force Advised Trump To Shutdown Travel From Europe

Just a matter of record, it was Emergency Manager Emperor Pence & his crackerjack Procurement Consortia Task Force who falsely advised Trump.

I do pray that everyone understands this is like reliving the nightmare of the Michigan Emergency Manager and the horrors of Detroit and Flint.

This is a federal level kind of Public Private Partnerships, whereby, I seriously can legally question its entire existence, in one of my trusty extraordinary writs of quo warranto.

Why is the Emperor doing the talkshow circuit?

He is putting out a call to arms, where those arms are not the arms of the United States, for the purposes of privatization.

This is about Parental Rights.

Praise the lord and #maytheheavensfall.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Jamie "Gigas" Raskin Knows He Is To Be Cast Out The Heavens On Being Judged Under Blasphemy, Heresy and Apostasy Laws

"Upon being cast from the heavens
in termination of the parental right
to bear the arms of the United States,
for talking shit, Jamie Gigas is going
to be judged by the people who vote
on what his shit talking did to their
children."
One of my Cyber Goddesses asked me the following question:

"What is Raskin going for here?"

Jamie is one of the "co-conspirators" of the real coup. Remember, Trump is the Accidental President....

The Tale Of Jamie & Sarah Raskin, Dan Kildee, TARP, Trafficking Tiny Humans & Detroit Land Bank Authority


This is about Gerrymandering, Child Welfare, Judiciary, TARP - Detroit and Michigan, and lots and lots of other historic stuff no one has ever, ever recorded in the annals of history, but me.

Dilly, dilly!

Let's impeach so Trump can present his "Witness under Protection of the Highest Authority".

#KAG2020

 #MariaButinaIsFree

 #FreeKwameKilpatrick

But who is the "Whistleblower under Protection of the Highest Authority"?

There is a hashtag for it.

#sayhisname

“It’s hard to think of a more central question as it relates to religious liberty,” Rep. Jamie Raskin, Maryland Democrat, said in support of a House resolution that calls for the global repeal of blasphemy, heresy and apostasy laws." 

Jamie is pushing this because he knows the heavens shall fall and his nasty ass, along with the rest of the lot, are going to be prosecuted for blasphemy, heresy and apostasy including Emperor Pence and his crew, of which Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi and Rashida Tlaib are in, too.

Raskin sits on Judiciary and did not say a muthafukkin thing to stop the coup.

He did not even show up for the Ghetto Ass Funeral or had two shits of a consideration to even drop a twat, [Twitter for those just now joining us.].

He said nothing which has left the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed displeased, for quite some time, now, and that is not a very good thing to do.

Elected Officials are held to a higher standard of ethics which is the Second Amendment.

They are first defrocked through uncloaking, which is the impeachment.

By what right does Jamie Gigas have to hold office?

Once they are removed from office through due process, the impeachment, they are then cast from the heavens to be tried on the land, by the laws of man.

Statutes, Codes, Rules.

These are the frauds that can be effectuated when the heavens fall, or rather a legal bifurcation of jurisdiction, similar to what some may know as the ascension or elevation of the appeals process.

The Second Amendment is the descension, converse, a due process of the people to remove an elected official from office to be tried by the people. 

A grand jury is an official body, an arm of the court where the members possess the right to vote, to indict or not indict. The impeachment is the evidentary process for the grand jury.

You are in my realm. Stick with me kids, the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed shall narrate, and soon, livestream, when the heavens fall.

We also are facing a constitutional crisis which is another unlocked mechanism for the heavens to fall.

Here are the laws of the heavens. 

They all breached an oath of office, with a specificity of those who are officers of the court, more intuitively understood as an attorney, to protect the children's trust.

Get to know them.

#maytheheavensfall

Raskin, international observers call for end to blasphemy legislation across globe

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., asks a question of Corey Lewandowski, the former campaign manager for President Donald Trump, during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2019, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
"We are stripping voting rights from the heavens because
we will not be damned in being judged for blasphemy, heresy
and apostasy."
Christians in India’s Punjab province this week asked authorities to prosecute a fellow Christian for cutting a birthday cake in the design of a Bible.

Earlier this month, Indian authorities arrested two Muslim men for criticizing a recent high court decision upholding the right of a Hindu temple to be built on the ruins of a mosque.

And earlier this year, Asia Bibi — a Christian woman — left Pakistan, where she had spent three years in prison after being condemned to die for blasphemy for drinking water from a well reserved for Muslims.

India and Pakistan strictly enforce their blasphemy laws, which were enshrined in 1927 by British colonial rulers and have expanded since then. But these and similar laws in nearly 90 countries increasingly are being weaponized to silence religious dissent.

On Thursday on Capitol Hill, a lawmaker and international observers called for an end to blasphemy laws and other measures that direct religious thought.

“It’s hard to think of a more central question as it relates to religious liberty,” Rep. Jamie Raskin, Maryland Democrat, said in support of a House resolution that calls for the global repeal of blasphemy, heresy and apostasy laws. “There are billions of people on Earth who can be prosecuted for what are essentially thought crimes.”

More than 80 nations have blasphemy laws, which the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom defines as measures that penalize the act of insulting a deity or sacred things. Regions with the highest number of such laws are in Asia Pacific and sub-Saharan Africa, but several countries in the West, usually viewed as more religiously tolerant, maintain blasphemy laws, including Brazil, Spain and Germany.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, January 7, 2019

DOJ: U.S. Solicitor General Noel Fransico Petitions SCOTUS To Figure Out If Lybia Can Sue The Court For Not Being Able To Sue In Court

Of course, I have attempted to water this down to start taking small sips in understanding that our elected officials are implementing privatization policies through foreign actions by ignoring the simple fact that we are a tripartite government which is structured as a trust.

Privatization is the usurpation of Judicial powers by going through that god awful administrative law in those Privateering UCC ships that sail off after stealin' the children, land and the votes.

The fun part about all this is that SCOTUS may experience a constitutional crisis, which, dare I say, may be a situation of war crimes, including violations of the statutes of fraud in #cyberwars, better recognized as propaganda.

This is Jimmy Carter.

Jimmy is not mean to my Sweetie.

This is about the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976.

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of l976, Pub. L. 94-583, 90 Stat. 289l, 28 U.S.C. Sec. l330, l332(a), l39l(f) and l60l-l6ll [hereinafter the FSIA], limits the role of the Executive branch in suits against foreign governments and governmental entities by precluding the Department of State from making decisions on state immunity. The FSIA codifies the restrictive theory of immunity, incorporating criteria, which the courts had developed in applying the theory, while codifying and applying international law. (See ch. 5, Restatement 3rd, Foreign Relations Law of the United States, sec. 451-463, pp. 390, 435, American Law Institute (1986).) The Act prescribes the means of service for suits against a foreign state or agency and instrumentality in Section.

This is about privatization because it looks like the Michigan Emergency Manager Law where the Executive Branch can make policy through Executive Order usurping the powers of the Judicial Branch.

Only the Congress makes law.

In a nutshell, this is shockingly the progenitor to the Michigan Manager Emergency Law, which was born of Michigan Child Protection Law, the international model of privatization.

Petitioners are family members of Mihai Alimanestianu, one of seven United States citizens killed in the 1989 terrorist attack on United Trans Aeriens (UTA) Flight 772 over Niger.

They sued the Government of Libya.

They lost and appealed.

The district court entered a judgment in favor of petitioners, but their claims were dismissed on appeal pursuant to an agreement between the United States and Libya that required Libya to pay money into a settlement fund to compensate American victims of terrorism and the United States to restore Libya’s sovereign immunity to suit in U.S. courts.

Settlement funds is code for children's trust fund because that is how they are structure complex financial fraud schemes.

Then they sued the court for stealin' their claims.

Petitioners then sued the United States in the Court of Federal Claims (CFC), alleging that the government had taken their claims against Libya without just compensation.

So, what had happened was....

The State Department made the determination, devoid of any due process, that Libya sponsored the UTA attack and could not be immune from being sued which sounds exactly like Child Protection Law, because you are guilty, until proven innocent, which you can never be proven innocent as the quasi-judicial determination of rights to property fell under the Executive Branch.

Then, in the spirit of Child Welfare Law, "reasonable efforts to prevent the removal of the child were made" with lots of great programs, billed to the U.S. Treasury, just like child welfare bills to Medicaid, that Libya's parental rights to its sovereign immunity was terminated and its goods were

Beginning in 2003, when Libya decided to “relinquish its weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs,” the United States and Libya worked to reestablish normal diplomatic relations. 

Congress passed the Libyan Claims Resolution Act.



Then, Libya decided to settle for $1.3 billion to restore relations with the U.S., but not the UTA attack claims.

Image result for briberyIn October 2008, the Secretary of State certified receipt of the settlement funds from Libya, triggering the restoration of Libya’s sovereign immunity under the LCRA. Pet. App. 5a. President Bush then issued an Executive Order stating that the United States had “espoused” and “settled” the terrorism-related claims of U.S. nationals against Libya pursuant to the claims settlement agreement. 

TRANSLATION: AS SOON AS THOSE $$$ DROPPED, LIBYA GOT ITS SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY BACK SO IT COULD TURN AROUND AND SUE THE COURT FOR NOT LETTING IT SUE UNDER THE IN COURT.

The Executive Order set up a different funding stream to compensate the victims and dismissed all the DOJ claims in the Judicial Branch by setting up Public Private Partnerships to funnel the money through child welfare NGOs like they always do.

Just consider this form of stealin' an "humanitarian action" because people have properties to build and research to develop so they can keep stealin'.


Then, Libya claimed that they could sue the court for dismissing their claims because they did not have sovereign immunity, which amounts to stealin' personal property under the Fifth Amendment.

The court of appeals reiterated that prohibiting a claimant from asserting a claim in U.S. courts did not amount to a “physical invasion of property.

Then it goes on to say, "Blah, blah, blah", per se, usurpation of Judicial Powers, blah,blah, blah.... you can read the background model, here.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/fcsc/docs/lib-ii-184.pdf

Prior to 1976, a foreign state sued in United States courts would hie itself to the State Department and ask for an immunity letter. If the State Department acted favorably, the letter would have the practical effect of ending the lawsuit. To be sure, the Supreme Court's decision that such letters should be honored was a judicial determination based upon criteria for judicial deference developed in a series of foreign affairs cases. But such wholesale deference came to look very like surrender, particularly because the State Department's conduct was oft-times redolent of backroom politics: the department's decision to issue or withhold an immunity determination was not always based upon a strict reading of the Tate letter. The department regarded its function as partaking more of "political powers" -in Marshall's words 34-than of any quasi-judicial duty. It was difficult to see why litigants with presumably valid claims, often amounting to great sums, should live at the mercy of the diplomatic considerations which the State Department felt bound to honor.
Under the Act, the court-a federal court if the foreign state wants it that way-makes the immunity determination, looking only to the standards set out in the Act and, in theory at least, not to its own or somebody else's view of how nice or nasty the state-defendant's government is. The Act codifies a number of exceptions to a general principle of immunity, provides a procedure for serving process on a foreign state, and defines the assets that may be the subject of execution to satisfy judgment.
https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1875&context=mjil 


So, basically, the question I am presenting is if a claim is a moveable or immoveable one, because it sounds like chattel law to me, like what they do in adoption, termination of parental rights, quiet title actions, you know the routine when it comes to stealin' the children, land and the votes.

This action sounds like a foreboding proclamation to a series of Quo Warranto , but hey, what do I know?

I know this sounds like a constitutional crisis because there are more actions in the SCOTUS pipeline.

I also know it is not wise to be mean to my Sweetie.
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the government’s restoration of Libya’s sovereign immunity in U.S. courts and settlement of petitioners’ claims for more than $10 million in damages effected a taking of petitioners’ property without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, December 24, 2018

The Right To Bear Arms Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With Guns Because It Is About The Right To Bear Witness To Voting Rights

Gather round, my Dearies, for the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed is to tell the yuletide tale of the "Right to Bear Arms".

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution 1789 (revised 1992) 

Once upon a time there were kings and queens who had granted the right to bear arms, under the royal crest in the laws of armory, where arms were a representation of a family legacy, surname, heritage, under consent of the king, to function in what is known as heraldry, the extended appendage of the kingdom.

A COMPLETE GUIDE TO HERALDRY
Illuminated A
rmory is that science of which the rules and the laws govern the use, display, meaning, and knowledge of the pictured signs and emblems appertaining to shield, helmet, or banner. Heraldry has a wider meaning, for it comprises everything within the duties of a herald; and whilst Armory undoubtedly is Heraldry, the regulation of ceremonials and matters of pedigree, which are really also within the scope of Heraldry, most decidedly are not Armory.
"Armory" relates only to the emblems and devices. "Armoury" relates to the weapons themselves as weapons of warfare, or to the place used for the storing of the weapons. But these distinctions of spelling are modern.
The word "Arms," like many other words in the English language, has several meanings, and at the present day is used in several senses. It may mean the weapons themselves; it may mean the limbs upon the human body. Even from the heraldic point of view it may mean the entire achievement, but usually it is employed in reference to the device upon the shield only.

The right to bear arms, as worded in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has nothing to do with people running around, locked and loaded, with weapons that fall under the scope of what is know as "guns".

There are ancient tales of the court room having tables set an arms length apart, as in a sword, and the bench is the length of a sword, just in case someone was willing to fight to the death for justice, in the preservation of their ethical truths.

It has to do with Voting Rights of the people to say who can represent society, and in the modern day understanding of the Second Amendment, it means more than who can own a gun, because that was all propaganda generated under the Parental Rights Amendment where they equated parental rights with gun rights, which had absolutely nothing to do with owning a gun.

It was about property rights, under chattel law, in the form of UCCs sailing away with our children's trusts by pilfering the national treasuries of world governments, under the fake ass guise of a Public Private Partnership of Corporate Shape Shifters using the Marques of ecclesiastical law, in the promotion of always doing the work of the Lord, the recordkeeper of the land.

The right to bear arms is about genealogy, were families, not necessarily related with any degree of consanguinity, would function as a industrial unit to maintain survival on a legally registered land mass, under the allodial title of the kingdom by registering the family crest.

Now, we go DNA daatabases.

The Arm of Congress
The family crest would contain the lineage of the family

Now, we have arms of dominion and sovereignty.

Arms are also bestowed upon elected officials through the Scrivener, the Scribe, more readily recognized as the Notary, granted powers of verification and nullification of the official record of the genealogy of the state, in the Repository of the Great Seal, the official arm as the keeper of the record, which records the grant of the right to bear arms as holder of public office.

Now, we have the affidavit in the form of a social media post, which must be held to the same standards as any other individual right to vote, or rather bear witness to frauds, attached to the ethical and/or commercial arms, both hands and feet of the supreme body of jurisprudence, under the exact same penalty of criminal or civil laws.

In essence, if you lie, you need to be held accountable.

Violence is economic, financial, physical, or any other form of which corrupts the annals of history.

The same applies to propaganda, a violent act upon the public that harms the children's trust, all forms of it... in elections, in politics, in finance, in marketing, in law (ooooooo... I am going to be busy, busy, busy on this one. The Madame Maura Corrigan was super busy legislating from the bench all over the place. NOTE TO SELF: BUY MORE BLEACH AND RUBBER GLOVES.)

The royal assent, or in this modern understanding, the elected official, could be challenged in the itinerant court, or in the higher court of the Magnum Concillium, better recognized as the Supreme Court, through the process of the royal veto, which is the Court of Arms, or better recognized, but probably not, as the Electoral College or rather the College of Arms.

Contained within the Electoral College are the State and County Boards of Canvassers who advise the Electoral College, like the Pursuviant of the College of Arms.

False advisement, propaganda, is a public fraud because it interferes in elections and I would even go so far to say it is a verifiable form of uttering and publishing the results of an election where the public voice of fraud was ignored.

This is not the best interests of the child.

The Electoral College was based upon the Three Fifths Rule and has never, ever, ever, ever, changed, which is just one example of the residual of the peculiar institution, because it still recognized the right to bear arms, as a corporate instrument of authority to do what they wanted with society, based upon chattel law, where the mechanism to veto the royal assent can be witnessed in the quo warranto.



The Second Amendment is the progenitor of Voting Rights.

See, it goes like this.

There was always an individual who was the one who would voyage under the granted arm, to represent their recorded land, kingdom, country, state, county, city, estate of corporation, on behalf of the people, in the spirit of the best interests of posterity, or, what is omitted from any form of history, the children, in the name of the one who granted the arm.

That individual would be granted a title of nobility, not foreign, but domestic, to protect the public record of the arm, the family, the legacy, the heritage, the lineage, or whatever you wish to call it, in the recording of the birth of tiny humans and land.

The recorded title of each birth and land is a moveable chattel.

The physical building is an immoveable chattel, attached to the land.

The child is attached to the land, in nationality, or, in this instance, in the certification of the birth by the county, the keeper of the record.

The birth of a child (and adult) can be changed, or rather, "born again" through the issuance of a new birth certificate, like what they do in adoption.

The same applies to marriage, or what is known under chattel law as wifery.

The laws regulating a well-armed militia protect Free States, as opposed to the Slave States that readily engaged in the moving of chattels.

Basically, the Second Amendment established regulation of society in various forms to stop stealin' of children, land and votes, because there was now, a well-regulated militia, in the officers of the courts.

The United States has standing armies, conferred upon the right to bear arms, in the Attorneys General and Auditors General, as each division of federalism, the States, have them, and their rank and file of officers called attorneys, of whom must also bear witness to the right to bear arms in nullification of the attorney-client privilege in frauds, as an original source.

This includes the regulation of frauds perpetrated by licensed attorneys who have been grieved by the public and must have their right to bear arms, terminated.

The arm of the U.S. Department of Justice

Arms are the powers of law enforcement, to protect the free States, and the right of the people to vote, without interference of election or any other forms of fraud.

Image result for CIGIE
The arm of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency

These records of birth were maintained under ecclesiastic law, the Canon of chattel law, in vessels that would have the right to bear arms, you know, like ship flag on a manifests of goods.

The birth record was crucial in verifying the allodial title of the moveable chattel, or rather, who owned the person and the personae, or rather, what rights a person held in society, based upon the bipolar scale with endpoints of being free or being enslaved, based upon the concept of civil debt based in property law.

In essence, you cannot vote if you have not been granted the right to bear arms, or rather verified nationality.

Think of the right to bear arms like showing a passport, articles of incorporation, for the right to vote.

Corporations vote, too, you know.

Corporations can also hire militias, or, private armies.

Image result for u s flag
The 50 Arms of the U.S. Coat
Men at arms came about to be, basically, private armies who would cover up their armor with "coats of arms" so the armor would not rust, because the upper echelon of the arm, or bearers of the family crest, really were not prone to going to war to protect the kingdom, which was the right to their land and profit.

Coats of arms is where a bunch of landowners, granted arms under heraldry law, got together and said, "Hey, why don't we pool our powers and resources to invade stuff by putting them all bunched up into one crest and expand shores to make a bigger kingdom."

This was the time they came up with the Marquee, another vehicle in the right to the royal assent in the acquisition of the granted right to bear arms, or articles of corporation under the Marquis, the Lord of the record under Canon law of chattels, under what is known as commercial law, the Uniform Commercial Code, which is international law.

Image result for greek public senators
The Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed is the final
arbitor of the election
Maxims of law, based in ecclesiastical law, canons, are different and distinct from commercial laws which is why they are considered to be ethics in truth, the qui tam, as the right to bear witness in Magnum Concillium, the superior spiritual court of the public trust, upon a fraud executed upon the people of land, the kindgdom, by terminating the right to bear arms, the Marque of the state of which the business is incorporated.

The same holds true for the quo warranto, another extraordinary writ to challenge the right to bear arms when questioning what right does one have to hold the Marque of the public office by bearing witness to the frauds of election.

There are no ethics in corporate law which is why they came up with that privatization crap of Social Impact Bonds in their social campaign of corporate responsibility policies of a corporate parent through those fake authorities in Public Private Partnerships.

Odysseus and Penelope by Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein (1751–1829)
"How much longer must I deal with these
'Legal Geniuses' (trademark pending)?"
Maxims of law exist in the form ethics, established by the beliefs of society, corporate law deals in commerce, where the regulation of the two are founded in the due process, which is why there is a right of entry and a right of exist, well established as voting rights in the public courts.

Voting rights are the rights of the people to call out fraud, under the true regulation of a society.

#perkinscoiesucks

Agape voci.



That is why, in the calling out of frauds (a.k.a. stealin') there must always be the art of consent, the "I do" under that cyclical, perpetual, pareto optimalization, for the greater good of society contract in the children's trusts, our most precious treasures.

It is just a Rousseau thing.

It is not gold; it is the children.

"Before you are a man, you are a child."

That is why the only way to finally address the privateering of our institutions is properly address the residuals of the peculiar institution.

Greater coat of arms of the United States.svg
The United States Arm
We are not going to cite the commercial codes, common laws, constitutions, public policy, rules or regulations, marked by the right to bear arms in the Great Seals of the U.S., States, Counties or Cities, we are going to testify in the public, under the qui tam, to force these people to bear arms so we can bear witness to the frauds perpetrated upon humanity in the form of war crimes.

If we do cite there authority, we contractually consent to play by their rules and beliefs in commercial law, which nullifies the ethical standing as a whistleblower.

In short, one calls out the frauds perpetrated upon the children's trusts.

The right to bear arms is the sister to the right to bare witness in due process, more intuitively recognized as Voting Rights.

The entire Second Amendment platform to push the industry of guns, was based upon foreign funded propaganda, that all started in the State of Michigan.
Beverly Tran
The Michigan Arm of the Great Seal is not a sewer hole.
(I am lifting the seal to expose the crap)

COAT-OF-ARMS AND FLAG


Act 209 of 1911

AN ACT to adopt and prescribe the design of a state coat-of-arms and state flag, and their use; to prohibit the use of the same for advertising purposes; to prescribe standards for the manufacture, sale, and display of certain flags of the United States and the state flag; and to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state agencies and officials.

History: 1911, Act 209, Eff. Aug. 1, 1911 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 167, Imd. Eff. June 14, 2012

© 2017 Legislative Council, State of Michigan  <===where do they always copyright public law?

The People of the State of Michigan enact:

DocumentTypeDescription
Section 2.21SectionState coat-of-arms; adoption.
Section 2.22SectionState coat-of-arms; emblazonment.
Section 2.22aSectionPurchase of United States or state flag; manufacture; applicability to local units of government.
Section 2.23SectionState flag.
Section 2.24SectionGovernor's flag.
Section 2.25SectionState coat-of-arms; where hung.
Section 2.26SectionState coat-of-arms; use on official letterheads and documents.
Section 2.27SectionUnited States flag, state flag; display, expense payment.

All I am doing right now is sharpening my nails for Laurence Tribe and Janet Napolitano. 



Bring it on, Boo Boos.

The moral of the story, once again, "Do not be mean to my Sweetie. Period."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, August 13, 2018

Cocktails & Popcorn: Voting Fraud In Detroit Databases

Image result for election popcorn
"And in 2018, too!"
I believe everyone is waiting for the absentee voting ballots to be tabulated.

It would such a shame if it is found that there were registered voters who submitted absentee ballots in those Detroit Land Bank Authority properties.

But hey, what do I know?

I know what a quo warranto is.

Election results firm to explain glitches to Wayne Co.

The top two officials at a software company used by the Wayne County Clerk's Office to report results in the Aug. 7 primary election are expected to appear at Monday's Board of Canvassers meeting to explain the glitch that caused a delay in website results.

Jeff Delongchamp, president of ElectionSource, the company that handles election results reporting, said he and Steve Delongchamp, company vice president, will attend the meeting at 2 p.m. in Detroit.
"Both Steve and I will be there and look forward to explaining to the board what happened to the web site displaying the un-official results on the eve of the August 7th Primary election," Jeff Delongchamp said in an email to Wayne County officials.

On Thursday, Wayne County commissioner Jewel Ware called for an investigation into the system, saying said glitches with the website were "extremely problematic as the voting process should be error-free as well as voters should know the process is without issues.”

Wayne County officials and ElectionSource said last week the glitch caused a delay in results after the website received more data than the company anticipated.

"I received phone calls from people who were concerned,” Ware told The News last week. “Then, after hours of reporting, the system came back and those numbers had decreased. It just wasn’t one number — it was several numbers."

Jeffrey DeLongchamp said last week that the file containing Wayne County results was so large that it caused a 15-second delay in processing old and new data. This caused results to be doubled at times, he said.

"There were so many hits and so many people trying to scrape the site at the same time that we could not load the data correctly," DeLongchamp said. "It was an error that, unfortunately, we did not foresee."

ElectionSource has helped Wayne County report its election results since last November's election, DeLongchamp said.

Wayne County Clerk Cathy M. Garrett also requested an investigation into ElectionSource and a report of the company's findings.

On Friday, members of the House Detroit Caucus sent a letter to the Michigan Board of State Canvassers demanding an audit of Tuesday’s primary election results in light of issues at polling stations in Wayne County during the primary.

Fred Woodhams, spokesman for the Michigan Secretary of State, said his office has been in communication with state Rep. Sherry Gay-Dagnogo, D-Detroit, about this issue and is trying to get more details from her about her specific concerns.

Gay-Dagnogo said in a statement that caucus members were contacted by Detroit residents who said they were being turned away from their former polling place only to find that poll workers did not have accurate information.

"From what we understand from Detroit elections staff, there were a few polling locations that were moved before the deadline, and we were told that affected voters were given proper notice, but we’ll follow up with the clerk’s office about that. The city has 490 precincts so it’s not uncommon to have some move each cycle," Woodhams said in an email on Monday.

"I want to add that the Wayne County canvassing board started its work on Wednesday to scrutinize all the results and ensure everything adds up. The concerns of the representative and others may be resolved by the canvassing process," Woodhams said.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, June 5, 2017

How Detroit Land Bank Authority Michael Brady Bribed Attorney Crystal Hopkins To Drop A Federal Fraud Case Against Them


Displaying 20170508_154907.jpg

Principal Attorney for the Detroit Land Bank Authority/Building Detroit, Michael Brady, defendants of a federal case represented by Crystal Hopkins, signs over the property of 1207 Longfellow, below, over to the resident agent of the Michigan corporation of Solis Estates, LLC, where it is alleged that Crystal Hopkins, a licensed Michigan Attorney, impersonated her twin sister, stealing her identity, to secure $125,000 mortgage, with the assistance of Michael Brady, as a bribe to get a federal case dismissed.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission Filing On Detroit Land Bank Community Development Corporation - Michael Brady, et al

Did you ever wonder why so many people lost their homes in Detroit?

Did you every wonder why the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission did nothing about it?

Well, that is because I am on a mission...and the U.S. Department of Treasury did not like what the Detroit Land Bank Community Development Corporation was doing, as a 501c3, non-profit, incorporated for "charitable, education and scientific purposes".

It seems the Michigan Licensing and Regulatory Affairs did not like what they were doing either because it is now, defunct.

With that said, I guess the Detroit Land Bank Authority and the Detroit Land Bank Community Development Corporation is going to have a really, super-duper, hard time filing that mandatory court document of Statements of Disclosure of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interest in the action of qui tam.

Oh, and by the way, Bill Schuette knew this was under federal investigation, so do not blame him.

And, as a side note, the Detroit Land Bank Community Development Corporation was never a Quasi-Governmental Organization.

They lied to the State of Michigan and its residents.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©