Showing posts with label Marianne Azizi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marianne Azizi. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

DNA Surrogate Citizenship Adoptions: A New Way To Traffic Tiny Humans

To begin, allow me to put forth this disclaimer:

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT PEOPLE DO IN THE BEDROOM

Now, that we have that out of the way, let us dissect this issue of the U.S. State Department denying a surrogate child's citizenship.

U.S. Completely Shut Down In International Adoptions

This has to do with $13,400 a year in adoption tax credits and tax exempt trust funds.

This has to do with a financial investment in chattel.

This has to do with the U.S. stopping the international trafficking of tiny humans.

This has to do with pushing the proverbial envelope in the emerging industry of buying and selling tiny humans.

If the tiny adopted human grows up, and something happens where its naturalized citizenship is revoked, what is the country of origin for deportation?

This has everything to do with foreign nationals coming into the U.S. and taking over our government.

Did you know there are numerous Members of Congress who possess dual oaths with Israel like Jerrold Nadler, Ranking Member of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee?

Well, now you do.

Think about that the next time someone kicks in your door to steal your child and wonder, whose best interest are being protected.

If they can adopt this child without termination of parental rights in a court of law, then we have another instance of the residuals of the peculiar institution raising its ugly head, again.

Did you know Israel is formatting U.S. public policy in child welfare without even registering as a foreign agent under FARA?

Now, you do.

Did the surrogate mother register under FARA, considering the fact that she is doing an international transaction through the U.S. State Department.

Did she go through COA, of which I have some serious issues with its entire existence?

Below, is a video of Marianne Azizi reporting out of Israel about the government legally kidnapping children, but it is worse in the U.S.



This litigation should be fun, well, at least for the DOJ and me.

Israel has always had a DNA issue with citizenship adoptions.

Gay couple sues State Dept for denying surrogate child’s citizenship

A gay couple is suing the U.S. State Department after the agency informed the couple that one of their twin sons, born through a surrogate mother, was denied citizenship because his father is an Israeli citizen, The Associated Press reported Wednesday.

Andrew and Elad Dvash-Banks, who are American and Israeli citizens, respectively, had two boys born through donor eggs carried by a surrogate mother in Canada last year. The two twin boys, Ethan and Aiden, share the same mother but each carries DNA from only one of the two fathers.

Upon returning to the U.S. with his family, Andrew Dvash-Banks was informed that his second twin, Ethan - who is biologically Elad's son - was not linked by DNA to an American citizen, and therefore does not benefit from automatic American citizenship.

LGBT and immigrants' rights groups argue that the agency is wrong, and that any child born to a U.S. citizen who marries abroad is owed U.S. citizenship, regardless of where they are born or whether one parent is a foreigner.

"What we're trying to do is pursue justice for Ethan," said Elad Dvash-Banks, "and correct a wrong that the State Department is continuing to pursue that might affect other couples."

"I started crying," added Andrew Dvash-Banks. "These are twins, how can you differentiate between them? They were born minutes apart."

Immigration Equality's executive director Aaron Morris told the AP that the agency's decision represents a type of discrimination that gay or otherwise nontraditional families experience at the hands of U.S. immigration personnel.

"If a mother and father walk into a consulate and have a marriage certificate and birth certificate, they're never asked any questions about the biology of the child," said Morris. "But the converse is also true and every same-sex couple will be asked that."

Legal experts say the 2010 defeat of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) at the Supreme Court paved the way for a number of cases involving both artificial insemination and LGBT parenthood to come forward.

"This is an absolutely fascinating, cutting edge area of law that stems from [DOMA] being overturned," immigration lawyer Ally Bolour told the AP. "It was just a matter of time for this issue to be decided by the courts."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Happy Adoption Month: Why The Hell Is The U.S. Using Israeli Privatization Policy Research In Child Welfare?

In honor of November, National Adoption Month, I would like to present to you, another example of high quality propaganda to promote the profiteering through privatization in modern day human trafficking, more readily known as adoption.

Joseph Deutsch
Here you shall find a study, even through it was used to craft federal policy, a private document, of which you must purchase, to find out its methodology.

So, instead of translating a bunch of goobly gook of researcher bias to justify making more money, I thought I would take a different approach to support my position that the Children's Bureau Express, is pumping out more crap for personal inurement, whether through private investment of social impact bonds, political campaigns, or any other type of fraud scheme.

Let us begin with the authors, one by one.

Joseph Deutsch is an Isreali professor of economics out of Bar Ilan University.  Why is an Isreali professor pontificating on U.S. child welfare policy?

Professor Simon Hakim
Simon Hakim
Next, we have Simon Hakim, with a background in privatization, security, private and public police and prisions, hailing from a Isreali university background,  from the Center for Competative Government, formerly known as the Privatization Research Center, promulgating U.S. child welfare policy?

Uriel Spiegel, also hailing from Bar Ilan University, is putting in his groundbreaking economic perspectives of supply and demand, hailing from the microeconomic school of autarky and monopolies in government privatized programs.  (I have substituted extreme economic sarcasm as I was unable to find a photo of Uriel).

Last, but not least we have Michael Sumkin, a Masters student from Bar Ilan University, who relies upon previous published research hit papers for the Children's Bureau Express like: The Economics of the Baby Shortage

Why is the United States even using anything out of Isreal in dealing with child welfare when it is stealing its own children.

Are these foreign university policy think tanks registered as foreign agents?  Nope, but they should be.

U.S. v. Israel: Which Is Worse In Child Welfare?

Israel Uses U.S. Immigrant Child Welfare Model


I would be remiss to mention there are many, many Israeli pharmaceutical corporations that have relocated to Russia after being busted for Medicaid fraud in child welfare and bribing governmental officials through campaign contributions with these privatized policies.

For me, this is just another reason to quickly advocate for indictments for Jerry Milner. (Notice I skipped the investigation process because I am that confident he is financially linked up with Israeli funding, some how, some where, but I will leave that deep dive until another post.)

So, why is the hell is the United States reliant upon research from Isreal in promoting privatization in child welfare using dirty data based upon false claims and bribing of elected officials through privatization fraud schemes?

Subsidies for Private Agencies Increase Adoption Rates For Older, Special Needs Children

According to a recent study, subsidies should be created to accelerate the adoption of older and special needs children from foster care and enable private contracting of this work for best results.

The study analyzed the impact of public and private interventions in adoption services, as well as government adoption subsidies in all 50 states between 1996 and 2010, and considered variables such as attributes of the adopted child, adoptive parents, the state, and the adoption process.

As described in the article "Privatization and Subsidization of Adoption Services From Foster Care: Empirical Evidence," the results led the authors to conclude that adoptions conducted through a private agency for young and healthy children were not as efficient as those conducted through a public agency.

However, when cases involved older children and those with special needs, privatization resulted in improved and accelerated services. The study also found subsidization to be particularly successful for older children and children with special needs, while it was not a factor in the adoption of healthy babies.

The authors suggest limiting subsidies, however, to those adoptions that have historically proven more challenging (i.e., the adoption of older children and those with specific medical or mental health concerns). They also caution that contracting out adoption services is only appropriate when ample competition exists among agencies because that provides contractors with greater motivation to excel.

"Privatization  and Subsidization of Adoption Services From Foster Care: Empirical Evidence," by Joseph Deutsch, Simon Hakim, Uriel Spiegel, and Michael Sumkin (Children and Youth Services Review, 78), is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740916305795.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, July 22, 2017

The rare moment when children are released by the Israeli revaha (cps/social services/welfare)

I have yet to make up my mind as to which country does a better job at legally kidnapping children, Israel or the U.S.

Israel Uses U.S. Immigrant Child Welfare Model



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

U.S. v. Israel: Which Is Worse In Child Welfare?

Children are commodities, always have been, but the question is who monetizes child trafficking better?

U.S. or Israel?


I am going to say the both because in the U.S., we use corporations of the tax exempt God which are funded through your federal tax dollars.

Catholic Charities

The League of Jewish Women

How far are you willing to go to save your children?

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©