Michigan Court Of Appeals Video Hearing On CPS Termination Of Parental Rights - (a.k.a. Trafficking Tiny Humans By Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Featuring Vivek Sankaran

The case is about a mother about to have her rights terminated to her ninth child.

The man judge said,  "she should know how this works since she lost her eight previous kids."

So, I guess the case is about the attorney and, I shall assume the court, that the mother was not advised of her civil rights in the course of her Child Protective Services case.

{this is the point where I am going to walk away for a few moments to ground myself in that glorious chi, so I do not say anything too disparigning about these "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

Each and everyone one of these individuals need to fall from the heavens.

These people refuse to accept that Michigan lies, promulgates lies through child welfare propaganda for the purposes of selling tiny human chattel.

When a mother has a child snatched and sold by the State, they typically will have another child to fill that void.

In Michigan, a previous termination of parental rights is automatic grounds for termination to all posterity of the mother, and sometimes the father, for all eternity.

This case is about a mother who was poor and in need of help she never received because someone checked that "reasonable efforts" box.

If these "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) cannot even mention fraud upon the court in the generation of false claims to be published in the public record, then how the hell can the mother understand.

Why do these parents take pleas?

Because it ends the suffering of her children's hopes of going home so they can move on to a life of being drugged, raped, tortured, and lab rated.

That is exactly what they did to Ricky Holland's original parent.

Ricky Holland: Murdered By False Claims In Child Welfare

Vivek Sankaran is grooming an army to continue cloaking the Michigan industry of trafficking tiny humans because he refuses to mention the fraud and corruption.

Interestingly, the next case is being adjudicated under the same transposable model in the termination of parental rights, in SNAP licensing.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Do Parents Have Civil Rights? Kansas Sued For Trafficking Tiny Humans

In the wake of the settlement in the Right To Lie case, parents now have case precedent.

You will stop lying to steal and sell our children.

We may not be able to afford, let alone, find a competent attorney, but we are capable of invoking the powers of our civil rights, and filing in the court.

Typically, the Chancery, clerks of the court will rely upon internet searches on the merits of the case, which is why I first started blogging, for there was no verifiable source or historic reservoir of information for the fraud in foster care and adoption.

Unfortunately, there has been a very coordinated effort to promulgate propaganda which discredits the legal claims put forth by the original sources, the original parents.

What is even worse is the fact that there are masses of individuals online, social media, that are fanatical when it comes to the sensationalism behind the psychosexual propaganda, the likes of that pizzagate crap and "The Idiot Known As Q", fueled by questionable financial sources.

These anonymous and online personalities shall be held accountable for promoting propaganda, for monetary and other purposes.

With these two, aforementioned propaganda factors, federal judges, trained and sequestered from reality, encased in the bubble called Public Private Partnerships jacked-legged research and training, with only "pre-Emancipation Proclamation" case law to make a decision, parents have no chance, whatsoever, to successfully litigate.

Parents, rather, pro se litigants who take the risk of further public ridicule, for the passionate purposes of saving their children from a life of torture in foster care and adoption, and file in the courts, do so, not out of greed, for no dollar amount will make the parents or the children whole again, but do so to preserve the historic record.

The National Archives have been ravished and systematically destroyed for years in child welfare.

The pro se is now the keeper of the record.

Here is background on Kansas trafficking tiny humans.

Whether or not we win, we will not be stopped and you will stop lying to steal and sell our children, and you will cease and desist doing it in the name of the tax exempt god.

The question I present to the Courts, for legal preparation, of course, is this: "Do parents have civil rights since children have no civil rights?" because children, with all their identification, are still on the books as moveable chattel and I formulate the question of civil rights as a question of property rights, as opposed to parental rights.

Godspeed.

Schwab v. Kris Kobach, Kansas Department of Children and Family Services, et al - Colorado 18-cv-02190 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Another $9,650,722.24 Reasons Why You Will Stop Lying, Stealin' & Selling Tiny Humans

No matter how long it takes, we are coming.

Stop stealin' children.

Much love, Deanna, much love.

Welcome to the end of trafficking tiny humans in Foster Care and Adoption.

My turn...

ASFA Gives Social Workers The Right To Lie In Child Welfare Cases

Learn more: BEVERLY TRAN: ASFA Gives Social Workers The Right To Lie In Child Welfare Cases http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2016/11/asfa-gives-social-workers-right-to-lie.html#ixzz5PLD35NHe
Stop Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare 

9th Circuit Opinion Says Child Welfare Workers Do Not Have"Right To Lie"

Learn more: BEVERLY TRAN: 9th Circuit Opinion Says Child Welfare Workers Do Not Have"Right To Lie" http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2017/03/9th-circuit-opinion-says-child-welfare.html#ixzz5PLDpCsLk
Stop Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare 

Do Social Workers Have a Constitutional "Right to Lie" Case 9th Cir 15-55563 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Right to Lie in Child Welfare Cases - Opinion 15-55563, 1-3-2017 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Ricky Holland: Murdered By False Claims In Child Welfare

Ricky Holland,
Murdered by Michigan,
Billed to Medicaid

Sometimes, there is a need for reiteration.

You do not have the Right To Lie in a court of law.

You cannot generate fraudulent documents to submit into the public record.

You cannot submit false claims for federal cost reimbursement.

But you can submit false claims for federal cost reimbursement in Medicaid during a child welfare case, then funnel money into non-taxable trust funds, where that money is funneled into political campaigns and for other nefarious activities.

See, according to the False Claims Act:

Liability The statute begins, in § 3729(a), by explaining the conduct that creates FCA liability. In very general terms, §§ 3729(a)(1)(A) and (B) set forth FCA liability for any person who knowingly submits a false claim to the government or causes another to submit a false claim to the government or knowingly makes a false record or statement to get a false claim paid by the government. Section 3729(a)(1)(G) is known as the reverse false claims section; it provides liability where one acts improperly – not to get money from the government, but to avoid having to pay money to the government. Section 3729(a)(1)(C) creates liability for those who conspire to violate the FCA. Sections 3729(a)(1)(D), (E), and (F) are rarely invoked. 

But, herein lies the problem.

If, during another civil action, child welfare to be precise, judges find that a child placing agency, rather the State lied to legally kidnap a child and place as its ward, the Court is not mandated to refer any federal fraud to the States Attorney General nor the U.S. Attorney General.

One reason is because the States Attorney General are either prosecuting the child welfare case or defending its privatized contractual arm of the State.

There are so many child welfare cases, where it is documented in legal opinions, of false claims to federal programs.

There are so many Single Program Audits which are administratively adjudicated and monetarily settled, with no criminal penalties, no contractual disbarment, no listing on exclusionary databases of Medicaid, no sanctions, no removal of licensure.

Nada.

Then, there are so many secrecy laws, quite unique to privacy laws, where, these same child placing agencies have been found to, literally, get away with murder, which is exactly what happened in the Michigan case of Ricky Holland.

I will make the world honor that little boy.

This is personal.

This is why Child Welfare is modern day human trafficking of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth), or as I have previously stated, those who are more comfortable utilizing the terms of the peculiar institution can are free to chime in.

Besides, how can the DOJ prosecute when the records are shredded?

So much for preserving the annals of history.

Always remember, it takes a judicial determination to turn on the federal funding spigot.

So, here you have it, federal policy on immunity from prosecution in child welfare and not one congressional hearing...yet.

Anyone want to help me re-write the False Claims Act?  You do know I already started on it, right.

U.S. Administration on Children, Youth and Families Report To Congress On Immunity From Prosecution For Pro... by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Foster care and adoption is human trafficking and if you do not like what I have to say, then I strongly encourage you to submit a rebuttal, including your proofs.

In the academic and legislative world, these debates are skewed with dirty data, jack legged philosophies and ass backward theories.

In real life, the truth about human trafficking is not pretty, not pretty, at all.

I speak as an original source.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

9th Circuit Opinion Says Child Welfare Workers Do Not Have"Right To Lie"

On January 3, 2017, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rendered its opinion in the "Right To Lie" case.

9th Circuit Judge Stephen Trott

I can not give this opinion its proper honors due, so instead, I have provided a few highlights of Judge Stephen Trott's opinion.

No official with an IQ greater than room temperature in Alaska could claim that he or she did not know that the conduct at the center of this case violated both state and federal law.  The social workers in this case are alleged to have knowingly and maliciously violated the law in their attempt to sever Preslie’s protected relationship with her mother. Perjury is a crime under both federal and California state law, as is the knowing submission of false evidence to a court.

Then, there was this one.

When asked about these legal facts during oral argument, the following colloquy occurred: 

Judge Trott: Are you telling me that a person in your client’s shoes could not understand you cannot commit perjury in a court proceeding in order to take somebody’s children away? 

Answer: Of course not. 

Judge Owens: Was there anything you know of that told social workers that they should lie and they should create false evidence in a court proceeding? 

Answer: No . . . .

In a nutshell, the Justices ripped these child welfare workers, the county, and the legal community a new one by stating that

Trust me, I will be following up on this one because I want to know if the DOJ is going to follow up with criminal charges and if there exists an attorney, or just a warm body with a valid P number who is game on calling me to assist in bringing forth an action of false claims.

Hell, State can bring forth an action against Orange County.

But, of course, nothing will happen and the child welfare system will continue to operate as usual, well, they may snatch more kids to make up for the settlement of the case.

Right to Lie in Child Welfare Cases - Opinion 15-55563, 1-3-2017 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©