 |
|
'"Let justice be done
whatever be the consequence"
|
The work of "Legal Geniuses" (
trademark pending) never ceases to amaze me.
Seriously.
They just keep doing it, over, and over again.
These actions are about
crappy predictive modeling databases, by and through
Public Private Partnerships through UCC children's trust funds.
This is all about child welfare because this is about the Canon of Chattel Law.
This is why I continuously linger in a state of perpetual pain and suffering from Post Traumatic Fraud Disorder, whereby I must self-medicate in my fabulously pungent fashion of castigation,
in the spirit of fuschia, my personnae of the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed, for having arduously prepared for the fall of the heavens, to stop the
stealin' of children, the land and the votes, when it comes to dealing with "Legal Geniuses"
(trademark pending).
Please, anyone in the U.S. Department of Justice, Homeland Security, CIGIE, INTERPOL, or someone with some form of law enforcement powers, please make it stop.
Please?
Pretty, pretty, please?
It burns.
This was put out about a week before the 2018 General Election, with, I am assuming since I cannot find anything, that there was probably no open meetings with Detroit or Wayne County Clerks, nor public notice about the meeting to the formation, adoption, implement and all that jazz of this policy, not law.
DECLARATION OF INTENT REQUIREMENT: An individual who wishes to seek nomination or
election to a federal, state, county, city, township, village or school office with write-in votes is
required to file a Declaration of Intent with the appropriate election official by 4:00 p.m. on the second
Friday preceding the election. An example of the form appears in Appendix I. (Exception: An individual
who wishes to seek a precinct delegate position as a write-in candidate is required to file a Declaration
of Intent by 4:00 p.m. on the first Friday preceding the August primary or, as an alternative, may file a
Declaration of Intent with his or her board of election inspectors on Election Day. (See: “Precinct
Delegate Positions” in this chapter for additional information.)
• The local clerk is responsible for notifying the precinct board of any write-in candidates who filed a
Declaration of Intent by the filing deadline. (See: XI. “Election Day Issues, Instructing Voters” for
additional information.)
That makes this a policy, not a law, which is privatization and the same thing going on with other SCOTUS fast track cases.
But this is the law.
MICHIGAN ELECTION LAW (EXCERPT)Act 116 of 1954
168.136 Candidate for representative in congress; write-in.Sec. 136.If for any reason there is no candidate of a political party for the office of representative in congress, a blank space shall be provided on each of the official primary ballots that affords every elector of the political party an opportunity to vote for a candidate for that office by writing in the name of his or her selection.
History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 276, Eff. Aug. 16, 2012 Popular Name: Election Code
But then, a "Legal Genius" (
trademark pending) came up with the brilliant idea of just counting the votes they wanted for the candidate they want, not who the people want in office.
MICHIGAN ELECTION LAW (EXCERPT)
Act 116 of 1954
168.737a Write-in vote; declaration of intent; filing; death or disqualification of candidate; write-in candidate for precinct delegate; forms; information.Sec. 737a.(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the board of election inspectors shall not count a write-in vote for a person unless that person has filed a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate as provided in this section. The write-in candidate shall file the declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate with the filing official for that elective office on or before 4 p.m. on the second Friday immediately before the election. The secretary of state, immediately after the 4 p.m. filing deadline under this subsection, shall prepare and have delivered a list of all persons who have filed a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate under this subsection, if any, to the appropriate county clerks. A filing official other than the secretary of state who receives a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate or list of persons who filed a declaration of intent from another filing official under this subsection shall prepare and have delivered a list of all persons who have filed a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate to the board of election inspectors in the appropriate precincts before the close of the polls on election day.(2) If a candidate whose name is printed on the official ballot for the election dies or is otherwise disqualified after 4 p.m. on the second Friday immediately before the election, the requirement of filing a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate under subsection (1) does not apply to a write-in candidate. If a death or disqualification has occurred as described in this subsection, the board of election inspectors shall count all write-in votes for write-in candidates for the office sought by the deceased or disqualified candidate.(3) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to a write-in candidate for precinct delegate. The board of election inspectors shall not count a write-in vote for a write-in candidate for precinct delegate unless that candidate has filed a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate as provided in this subsection. A write-in candidate for precinct delegate shall file a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate with the appropriate city or township clerk for that precinct on or before 4 p.m. on the Friday immediately before the election or with the board of election inspectors in the appropriate precinct before the close of the polls on election day. A city or township clerk who receives a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate from a write-in candidate for precinct delegate under this subsection shall prepare and have delivered a list of all persons who have filed a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate to the board of election inspectors in the appropriate precincts before the close of the polls on election day.(4) The secretary of state shall prescribe forms for the declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate. Clerks shall maintain a supply of declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate forms in the clerk's office and make the forms available in the polling places during the August primary for this purpose. The declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate form shall include all of the following information:(a) The name of the person intending to be a write-in candidate.(b) The elective office that the person seeks as a write-in candidate.(c) The residence address of the person seeking elective office as a write-in candidate.(d) Other information the secretary of state considers appropriate.
History: Add. 1996, Act 461, Eff. Mar. 31, 1997 ;-- Am. 2006, Act 87, Eff. Mar. 30, 2007 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 276, Eff. Aug. 16, 2012 Popular Name: Election Code
But, alas, these "Legal Geniuses" (
trademark pending) had concocted another wily scheme to just have whomever they want to win,
when they were hoisted by their own petard, again.
If you do not file a notice of intent to be a write-in candidate, the city clerk can toss out votes.
Yup.
Ok, I get that even though I do not agree with whimsically throwing out votes without due process, but it looks like the statute was slightly changed to delegate powers of adjudication to the city clerk under the Emergency Manager Law.
That is correct.
The Emergency Manager can make whatever policy it wants when it comes to throwing out votes.
This is not about, specifically, a write-in candidate, this is about arbitrarily and capriciously throwing out votes, creating a society ruled by fear for there is no consent...as it was tossed out.
The funny thing is that the language says absolutely nothing about recording of the vote.
Just because a Write-In Candidate does not file Notice of Intent of Write-In, and, as such, no tally of votes will be counted, there is noting that says that the actual vote is prohibited, by whatever means the "Legal Geniuses" (
trademark pending) conjures up as a legal argument, form being recorded.
That is a destruction of the historic, public record.
That is a violation in all forms of frauds that boils down to violations of voting rights.
These frauds are grounds to
terminate the right to bear the arms of the State of Michigan, through the bearing of witness of individuals who have demonstrated in the public record, the many artifices of the schemes, when it comes to manipulating the vote.
All valid write-in votes cast for the above-listed candidates must be tallied. Please advise the appropriate city and township clerks to instruct their precinct boards to record any valid write-in votes cast for the indicated candidate(s) for Governor, US Senator, and any other district listed above that falls within your county. • A write-in vote cast for an individual who has not filed a Declaration of Intent does not count and must not be recorded by the precinct board. Similarly, a write-in vote cast for an individual who filed a Declaration of Intent does not count unless the office for which the write-in vote was cast corresponds to the office identified on the Declaration of Intent. Write-in votes which do not count for the above reasons are not considered when determining whether an over vote has occurred. For further information on the documenting and canvassing of write-in votes, please refer to Chapter 4 of the Election Officials' Manual.
Notice there is no identifying BINS nor date of creation.
Michigan Bureau of Election... by on Scribd
This is why the
Jill Stein Michigan case was basically thrown out because it was impossible to count the vote.
See, in the 2016 Primary Election, Bernie Sanders should have won, but did not, because we have no idea, even if he did file a Notice of Intent, because the Statutes are a hot mess, if he was considered a write-in on the Democratic Party Ballot.
Then, as
I have previously castigated, the absentee ballot applications were dated for the 2015 election cycle, not the 2016 election cycle, which meant that all those absentee ballots were just, automatically tossed, and I know how, what, when, where, and why, because we are dealing with "Legal Geniuses"
(trademark pending).
Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 General Election in the State of Michigan by approximately 10,000 votes.
Rumors have it at least 70,000 votes were tossed out in the Detroit 2016 General Election, but, hey, what do I know?
I know who has been filing these grievances quite some number of years.
I also know this is a manifestation of the residuals of the peculiar institution in chattel law.
And I also know when someone is invested into public office based upon fraud, we have a situation devoid of consent of the people, establishing a rule of fear. which means there must be due process, and in this instance, it should manifest in the form of grand jury indictments.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
