Showing posts with label Children's Village. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Children's Village. Show all posts

Saturday, August 1, 2020

Hillary Clinton & Her Rogue Ass Crew Champion Children's Villages' Corporate Parental Rights

Why is it the school did not present the girl's IEP to the court?

Did the girl have an IEP, and if not, why?

The following is taken from Oakland County Schools:
What is an IEP?
An Individualized Education Program (IEP) documents the agreed upon special education programs and services that are needed to ensure a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to students determined to be eligible under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). If a child is suspected of having a disability that may warrant the need for an IEP, an evaluation is necessary to determine eligibility.
What is a 504 Plan?
Section 504 of the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance and ensures that individuals with disabilities have equal access to programs, activities, and services as compared to non-disabled peers. A 504 Plan documents the agreed upon accommodations and/or services that an eligible student requires in order to have equal access to his or her education, to the same extent as his or her non-disabled peers.
Why was Mary Ellen Brennan's husband, an attorney, speaking in defense of his wife's decision to place the girl in the most restrictive environment when he was not part of the case?

Why was her husband speaking on behalf of the State of Michigan, without authority to represent the State?

Was the girl on any psychotropics, and, if so, was there any concerns raised on the level and type of medication?

The reason why the State Attorney General will never intervene is because of the contemporaneous conflict of interest of advising while advocating which is probably why the Court of Appeals kicked out the judgment.

Why are these elected officials coming out their political lairs advocating for this girl, when they all know of thousands of other children who were raped, drugged, tortured, beaten, lab ratted and sold in child welfare?

Do we have an issue of Medicaid fraud in child welfare?

Is Hillary "Skankles" Clinton going to use her law license to champion child welfare?

Well, of course, but will she say my name, or rather, what nasty things will she say about me?

Stay tuned because this is about Parental Rights.

Please leave any ideas of how Skankles and her rogue ass crew will assassinate my character in the comments, below.

Tales Of The New Crown: The Michigan Judicial Network For Trafficking Tiny Humans - Mary Ellen Brennan & Children's Villages

#maytheheavensfall


Oakland Co. girl jailed for not doing homework gets released

Pontiac — A 15-year-old Oakland County girl whose months long detainment drew national condemnation because it was punishment for missed homework amid the pandemic was released Friday evening to the custody of her mother.

The Michigan Court of Appeals ordered the girl's release earlier Friday from Children’s Village, a juvenile detention facility in Pontiac, following outrage, marches and public pressure from former presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton.

The girl's lawyers, Jonathan Biernat and Saima Khalil, said the teen was picked up by her mother around 5 p.m. after the Court of Appeals ordered her release from Children’s Village, a juvenile detention facility.

The girl will stay with her mother "pending appeal or further order of this court," the three-judge appellate panel ordered. Mother and daughter quietly slipped past more than a half-dozen reporters and photographers camped out at the facility's entrance for more than an hour.

“They just want to go home. ... She will get to sleep in her own bed tonight for the first time in weeks,” Biernat said.

Biernat said the girl was “obviously overwhelmed and thankful” to be going home.

“We didn’t expect this to happen until Monday," Khalil said. "The Court of Appeals did the right thing.”

The girl, who goes by the pseudonym Grace, was placed in the facility for juvenile offenders in May after failing to complete class assignments from Groves High School in Beverly Hills after the school switched to remote learning during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Judge Mary Ellen Brennan of Oakland County Family Court initially ruled the girl was “guilty on failure to submit to any schoolwork and getting up for school” and called her a “threat to (the) community” because she was on probation for assault and theft charges, according to a report by ProPublica.

Grace was on probation on assault and theft charges related to a November assault of her mother, according to court officials.

On July 20, Brennan ruled Grace was a threat to her mother and should complete her course of treatment, denying a motion for early release. Grace's lawyers appealed Brennan's decision to the Court of Appeals in a Monday motion that was supported by the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office.

Grace's adjustment to online classes during the pandemic was similar to other students and shouldn't constitute a probation violation, Khalil and Biernat argued in their motion. Administrators, kids and parents alike were navigating "unprecedented and uncharted territory."

But instead of assessing the full context of Grace's situation or attempting to address it through less extreme measures, "the 15-year-old high school sophomore was taken away from the courtroom in handcuffs and shackles," Khalil and Biernat wrote.

"The lower court's callous approach is evident in this case," they wrote.

The appellate panel that ordered Grace's release Friday included judges Deborah Servitto, an appointee of former Gov. Jennifer Granholm; Elizabeth Gleicher, also a Granholm appointee; and Jonathan Tukel, an appointee of former Gov. Rick Snyder.

Grace remains on probation and will be in court for another hearing at a time to be determined, Biernat and Khalil said. Both doubted she would be sent back to Children’s Village.

Both of her lawyers believe there are sufficient support services Grace can take advantage of while remaining at home.

“Mom was looking for resources, “ Khalil said. “She said ‘I need help,’ but she wasn’t handing over her daughter.”

U.S. Rep. Andy Levin, D-Bloomfield Township, on Friday praised the appellate decision, arguing Grace's case and others during the pandemic have brought to the surface "injustices underlying so many of our systems."

“There is absolutely no doubt that public pressure turned the tide for Grace and her mother," the Bloomfield Township Democrat said. "... We must continue dismantling the systems that allow young, Black girls like Grace to be incarcerated at a disproportionate rate."

U.S. Debbie Dingell, D-Dearborn, also celebrated Grace's release but warned her case was just one "in our broken criminal justice system."

“Let this case shine a light and raise awareness of the work we still need to do,” Dingell wrote on Twitt​​​er.

Criticism of the teen's detention poured in from across the country and locally after her story came to light.

Former Secretary of State Clinton earlier this month retweeted an article about the girl's detention and wrote: "Let her go."

On Thursday, six members of Congress called on Attorney General William Barr and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to intervene in Grace's case. The letter to Barr and DeVos was signed by Levin, Dingell, and U.S. Reps. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, Brenda Lawrence, D-Southfield, Haley Stevens, D-Rochester Hills and Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass.

"While Grace has faced many personal challenges in her young life, it was her lack of completion in online classes that the judge cited as the definitive reason for sentencing Grace to juvenile detention," they wrote in the letter. "This is unacceptable.”

Birmingham's board of education passed a resolution to review the matter, one that "reiterates (Birmingham Public Schools') deep belief that no harm should come to its students as a result of the sudden shift to online learning."

Oakland County Executive Dave Coulter called on Brennan to inquire on the matter, and protesters marched in large numbers to demand Grace be freed.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, June 3, 2018

Lisa Gorcyca Walks While Another Michigan Child Welfare "Cash For Kids" Fraud Scheme Goes Unnoticed By Schuette

Image result for Vichyssoise
Delicious justice is a dish best served cold
So, Lisa Gorcyca does not get suspension, like I said, because she was just doing her job.

But, does this mean whoever paid for the incarceration of the children can file a fraud claim for recovery?


Did Medicaid pay for it and if so, what was the cost?

Are the parents financially liable?

Perhaps, it is an insurance company?

Well, all I know is that I would most definitely file for recovery of the funds if I was the entity who ended up paying for it.

I wonder if Bill Schuette is going to refer this matter to the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, if it is Mediciad billing?


She is an elected official, but in a court of law, a judge and attorney, particularly an attorney representing a government entity, can say whatever they want about you in child welfare proceedings, or actually, in civil proceedings through a written or oral argument.

Heck, Bill Schuette had his Assistant AG state into the record that I was a public nuisance for exposing fraud. 


That was a most harrowing experience because I had to keep my mouth shut.

Such a situation may be within the purview of another law enforcement jurisdiction, but hey, what do I know?

Vichyssoie is not the only dish best served cold, so is justice.




In a child custody case that made national headlines after a suburban Detroit judge jailed three children for refusing to socialize with their father, the Michigan Supreme Court has rejected a harsher punishment recommended last year — ruling that Oakland County Judge Lisa Gorcyca should be publicly censured but not suspended for her courtroom behavior.

The high court said Friday that Gorcyca committed judicial misconduct by "directing demeaning and disparaging remarks" at the children during a hearing, but that other findings of misconduct by the Judicial Tenure Commission amounted to "mere legal errors made in good faith and with due diligence," which were remedied by the appeals court.

"Public censure was proportionate to" Gorcyca's "misconduct," the court ruled.

Justice Richard Bernstein dissented in part on the finding of "mere legal errors."

"I would have adopted the findings and recommendation of the Judicial Tenure Commission to publicly censure respondent and suspend her from office for 30 days without pay," Bernstein wrote.

The ruling means Gorcyca avoids a suspension without pay and will not have to pay thousands of dollars in fines and court costs. Their decision ends a two-year saga for Gorcyca, who was accused of mishandling the bitter child-custody case that lasted more than five years.

It also vindicates her decision to appeal to the state's highest court when some had recommended that she accept the findings of the Tenure Commission and take the suspension.

The Tenure Commission ruled in November that Gorcyca had committed Judicial Misconduct in her handling of the contentious child custody case in June 2015, when she sent three children, ages 9, 10 and 13, to a juvenile detention facility for 17 days for ignoring her order to visit with their father.
She compared one child's actions to those of cult leader Charles Manson and made a circular motion with her finger near her ear as she said it.

The misconduct case against Gorcyca became a lightning rod of controversy with father-rights advocates calling her a hero. Critics complain that she tried to force the children to love someone they didn't.

A Facebook group supporting Gorcyca attracted more than 1,200 followers while another group that opposes her claims more than 1,000 followers.

Read more:
The Tenure Commission had recommended suspension but only the Michigan Supreme Court can discipline judges.

Judges make $139,919 a year, so 30 days off the bench would cost Gorcyca about $11,660 in lost salary. The commission also recommended Gorcyca pay $12,553 in fines and costs.

Gorcyca had fought the case all the way to the Supreme Court.

"Judge Gorcyca has a well-deserved and well-earned reputation as a caring and superior jurist with the support of the entire family bench and bar," her lawyers, Thomas Cranmer and Christian Hildebrandt, wrote in a brief to the Supreme Court filed late last year. "A suspension of any sort, preventing her from performing her elected duties, would be an injustice."

The case involved Omer Tsimhoni and his ex-wife, Maya Eibschitz-Tsimhoni, and drew international attention after Gorcyca locked up the children.

 Advocates for the parenting rights of fathers backed Tsimhoni, arguing his was a textbook case of parental alienation. At one point, the children sat in chairs in the hallway with their arms locked together, refusing to enter the courtroom.

"This case is every judge's nightmare," Cranmer said at a November hearing. "This was five years of the most contentious, vexatious litigation imaginable."

After Gorcyca was accused of judicial misconduct, the divorce case was reassigned to Judge Joan Young, who presided over it until the end of 2016 when she retired. The case continues under new Judge Victoria Valentine. Both parties are now representing themselves after spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on lawyers.

The docket shows 999 entries in the case, the most recent earlier this month, when a judge ordered the couple to list for sale the couple's former home in Ann Arbor.

In July, more than 130 family court lawyers packed Gorcyca's courtroom to show their support for her. In September, a Pontiac man was charged with threatening to kill Gorcyca, whom he feared wouldn't treat him fairly in his own child custody case.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Michigan Adopts Three Fifths Legal Representation Of Parental Righrs

This case, as I determine as of this moment, is going to be historically pivotal in the direction of legal
Individual vs.States in economic rights
standings and policies of this nation towards the procurement of human capital, or in this specific incidence, the medical dependency of youth.

What we have here is a dramatic shift in the interpretation of child welfare law.

A judge, through a dependency court, has essentially emboldened the state with the powers of shared parental rights.

Even though the individual "sharing" parental rights with the state is a non-biological entity, the powers are split, without delineation percentage or weighted parental oversight in decision making.

What is most compelling of an interest is that there is distinct movement to expand, or, why do I not put this in a much more graphic term, how about, "bring back from the dead the raw power of Dred Scott standing, mixed with a heavy seasoning of the 'three-fifths' consideration of having constitutional rights".

Which party will possess the three-fifths of parental authority to have constitutional legal standing?

It began with the stripping of voting rights, and now comes the parceling of parental rights.

In this particular case, the Guardian Ad Litum has an unspecified percentage, and the step-father has a percentage.

To be fair, I have not read the ruling and cannot comment if this issue of which portion of the shared rights trump has been addressed.

Now, as this is a Michigan case, there is a possibility, but I am pretty sure I am spot on, the state is about to awaken, with the final ritual of policy making, the sleeping authoritative monster called the Michigan Children's Institute.

Through the history of this institution, its powers have expanded and contracted along side of socio-economic shifts.

Through the lens of privatization I can see the next pattern emerge in social programming, with cost reimbursements through Medicaid in dealing with an older youth population.

This has nothing to do with one's ancestry.  This has to do with maximizing billable opportunities.

Here is how it started.  Let's sit back and keep an eye on this case.

Teen taken by CPS reunited with family after nearly three months in Children's Village



PONTIAC, Mich. (WXYZ) - After spending 80 days away from her family at Oakland County Children's Village, the state is allowing a teenager to finally go home.

7 Action News cameras were there as 17-year-old Leiani McMichael exited the Oakland County Courthouse a happy teen, ready to go home.
Edwin Santana, her step-father, is happy to finally have her back.

"She's like, she's like my own daughter," Santana said. "She's been with me since she was 6 1/2."
Santana will have limitations when it comes to Leiani. Under an agreement with the state, Santana will share guardianship with a state appointed attorney. The attorney will have exclusive medical decisions over Leiani.

Child Protective Services took Leiani to live in Children's village in early November after accusing her mom of failing to give Leiani proper medical care.

Leiani's doctors contacted CPS concerned her mother, Rebecca Campos, was causing the teen to suffer from Conversion Disorder.

“Up until February 2015, Leiani was completely healthy, an amazing, thriving child,” said Rebecca.
Then, she started complaining that her stomach hurt. Doctors then diagnosed her with hernias, cysts, and removed her appendix. When she couldn’t keep food down, they gave her a feeding tube.

“Nobody could answer. Nobody knew why it got so extreme that a feeding tube had to be in place,” said Rebecca.

Then there was a problem with the feeding tube as Leiani visited her father who lives in California. Leiani needed surgery.

"After surgery Leiani didn’t wake up. She went into a coma,” said Rebecca.

She remained unconscious for days. When she did finally wake up, mom says Leiani was weak,
needed a wheelchair, had memory problems and started having seizures.

She took her to doctor after doctor searching for answers. Then, one doctor at the University of Michigan diagnosed her with conversion disorder. The doctor said Leiani didn’t need a feeding tube or a wheelchair. The problem was in her head.

"My wife was the one being accused of taking her to too many doctors appointments I guess, or not enough doctors appointments, it just snowballed," said Santana.

The family believes the state went too far and their attorney agrees.

As part of today's agreement, Leiani's mother and her younger sister must move out of their home, into an extended stay hotel.

"I don't like it but, it is what it is. As long as my girls are safe and they get to be reunited again and take the proper steps to bring them both together, my wife and I as a family then that's all that matters," said Santana.

The court has ordered a therapist help reintegrate the family that will now be split a second time by the state. 


 
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Michigan May Have 'Cash For Kids' Scams

Is it just me or does something sound hauntingly familiar, here.

It was only a while ago when the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission took action of a judge regarding children being questionably placed, in a contained environment, called Children's Village because they refused to have lunch with their father.

Then, you have another national case where it seems, almost identical medical issues, and the state removes the child then accuses the parents of not only providing medical instruction for surgery, but was able to get the insurance company to pay for the procedures.

So instead of going after the doctors who engaged in medical malpractice, supposedly, Michigan is going after the  mother for medical neglect.

And of course, everyone remembers the "Kids for Cash" case where the judge was sending youth to a facility which used to get him kickbacks.

Youth may stay under the auspices of the state until the age of 25 in certain situations, such as this one, with costs reimbursed, at some of the maximum rates. through Medicaid.

Children's Village looks like it may have found a new population from which to profit: older youth.

Of course, the Attorney General can not even investigate Children's Village as it is already representing them in the Child Protective Services case, and layer that fact with the recent policy changes where these state contracted child placing agencies are now, on "self-report" as an end result of deregulation.

I also know for a fact that The Children's Center of Detroit is preparing to expand its operations and get into the education programming and community-based, home-based services under the Medicaid Expansions.

I also heard Vista Maria has been constructing its new child welfare model by making the campus a contained environment for their kids who have kids, like a miniature city, to treat cognitive and psychological developmental challenges.

Since there is a national call for new models in dealing with child welfare, there also needs to be a balance in how these organizations operate.

There are no civil rights in child welfare, just remember that.

Mom says CPS took her daughter because of medical mystery


BLOOMFIELD HILLS, Mich. (WXYZ) - A Bloomfield Hills mom says her daughter was “medically kidnapped.”

Child Protective Services has forced 17-year-old Leiani McMichael to live in Oakland County’s Children’s Village. CPS is accusing mom of failing to give her proper medical care.

Rebecca Campos says as her daughter Leiani enjoyed a music lesson at her house in early November, she saw Child Protective Services workers walking up to her home.

She had to tell her daughter they were there to take her.

“She said, ‘Take me? What does that mean mom?' I said, 'I don’t know,’” said Rebecca.

Rebecca says the terrifying thing is that she still doesn’t know what it means.

“Up until February 2015, Leiani was completely healthy, an amazing, thriving child,” said Rebecca.
The now 17-year old started complaining. Her stomach hurt. Doctors then diagnosed her with hernias, cysts, and removed her appendix. When she couldn’t keep food down, they gave her a feeding tube.

“Nobody could answer. Nobody knew why it got so extreme that a feeding tube had to be in place,” said Rebecca.

Then there was a problem with the feeding tube as Leiani visited her father who lives in California. Leiani needed surgery.

"After surgery Leiani didn’t wake up. She went into a coma,” said Rebecca.

She remained unconscious for days. When she did finally wake up, mom says Leiani was weak, needed a wheelchair, had memory problems and started having seizures.

She took her to doctor after doctor searching for answers. Then, one doctor at the University of Michigan diagnosed her with conversion disorder. The doctor said Leiani didn’t need a feeding tube or a wheelchair. The problem was in her head.

"I said okay,” said Rebecca  “How do we fix this?”

The doctor at the University of Michigan contacted CPS. She said abuse could have caused the possible conversion disorder. Rebecca says different doctors disagreed. She says as she tried to figure it out, CPS showed up.

“I miss her so much,” said Rebecca, who hasn’t been allowed to even have a supervised conversation over the phone with her daughter.

Documents filed by prosecutors say, “Numerous physicians have performed unnecessary surgeries, diagnostic procedures, and other medical treatment based upon the parent's false or exaggerated reports.”

Court documents claim Leiani’s health is improving now that she is in the care of Children’s Village. She is having fewer “episodes” that her mother called seizures.

“Leiani was previously wheelchair bound. Leiani is now standing and taking steps. Leiani was previously on a feeding tube and would spit out table food, despite being viewed eating food at ties with no problems, when unaware of observation. Since removal, Leiani has kept food down, such as bread and a cookie,” says a document filed by the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office.

Leiani’s mom says her daughter has been showing improvement since coming out of the coma.  She was walking and eating what she could while at home as well.

She now is hoping a trial next month will prove her innocence and reunite her with her daughter.
“I have never done anything to make her sick, and I always have done my best,” said Rebecca. 

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©