Showing posts with label Rod Rosenstein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rod Rosenstein. Show all posts

Thursday, September 10, 2020

Prelude To Detroit: Who Is This Masked Man Who Was Orchestrating Angry Bob With His Ham Sandwiches?

Who was this masked man who was orchestrating Angry Bob with his Ham Sandwiches?


#maytheheavensfall

It’s clear Robert Mueller was in no condition to run his investigation — so who did?

To the liberal media, special counsel Robert Mueller was the sharp, seasoned, no-nonsense prosecutor who would get to the bottom of “collusion.” But when Mueller testified before Congress on July 24, 2019, many were stunned to see a man struggling to answer basic questions.

Had his cognitive abilities declined during the probe?

The 76-year-old Mueller, members of President Trump’s defense team recalled, appeared to be a figurehead investigator, a man who seldom spoke or was even seen. On those rare occasions Trump’s lawyers had a chance to talk to the special counsel, Mueller’s aides appeared to be covering for his lapses in memory. So who was really in charge of the Mueller probe?

There were questions about Mueller’s mental condition even before he was appointed special counsel in May 2017. Chris Swecker spent 24 years in the FBI. He left the agency in 2006 with the highest respect for his old boss, with whom he had extensive daily contact for more than two years. “Mueller was super sharp,” Swecker remembered.

In fall 2016, working in North Carolina, Swecker invited Mueller to speak at a conference. Mueller flew from Washington, and Swecker met him for breakfast to brief him on the event. He noticed something he had never seen in his old boss. “I remember telling my wife after the breakfast that he’s slipping,” Swecker recalled. “You could tell the acuity was not there. . . . He was a little confused about what to do after he got off.” When Mueller was made special counsel the next year, Swecker wondered whether he was up to it.

Communications aide Mark Corallo was a Mueller fan even as he worked for the Trump defense team. After his departure in July 2017, Corallo awaited a call — not from his old colleagues, but from Mueller. Prosecutors wanted to question him about Trump’s role in drafting a statement in response to New York Times reporting on the now-infamous Trump Tower meeting.

The session with Mueller’s lawyers took place on Feb. 15, 2018. “At the end of the interview, Mueller came in and shook my hand and put his hand around my shoulder and said, ‘It’s good to see you,’ ” Corallo recalled. “He said, ‘I’m sorry you got dragged into this.’ When he left the room, I said to Andrew Goldstein, ‘Hey, how’s he doing?’ They said great. I said, ‘Well, he looks a little gaunt. Is he eating? Is he tired?’ They said, ‘No, he’s running circles around us.’ This was the first time I noticed that he was not physically robust.”

Nearly a year and a half later, watching Mueller testify on television, Corallo was taken aback. “When I saw him testifying, it was significantly more apparent,” he recalled. “And trust me, I was not the only one. Those of us who worked with Bob at the Justice Department after 9/11 and watched his testimony — the phone calls were flying. ‘Holy crap, what’s wrong with Bob? Is he sick?’ ”

In another key meeting, according to members of the Trump defense team, the special counsel seemed unfamiliar with a key Justice Department policy having to do with indicting a sitting president. “After that, we never met with Mueller, and we never spoke with him on the phone,” Trump defense lawyer Jane Raskin recalled.

Robert Mueller memo shows why each key figure was targeted in probe
“What’s galling to me in hindsight, knowing what we know, is that they dragged it out as long as they did,” said Corallo, the Trump comms man. “Which says to me that people other than Bob Mueller were running that investigation.”

But who? Speculation focused on Andrew Weissmann, the aggressive prosecutor sometimes known as Mueller’s “pit bull.” But the inner workings of the Mueller investigation were never fully clear to those outside. All the president’s lawyers could see was that Mueller didn’t seem to be in control.

“Bob at the end was AWOL,” Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow recalled. “That was the great con. He showed up for cameo appearances. He was the Wizard of Oz. He was back behind the big curtain, pulling some strings here and there, but when you pulled the curtain away, he wasn’t even really the one pulling the strings.”

When Mueller testified, everyone could see what Team Trump had seen. It wasn’t pretty. And it ended Democratic hopes of turning the Russia probe into a glorious victory.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness: Fraud Against The Court - Sally Yates, Michael Flynn & FISA

They still do not get it, which makes it all that much sweeter when they final do.

#maytheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, June 4, 2020

The Legal Geniuses Of House Judiciary & Senate Homeland Security Are Still Trying To Figure Out How The Mueller Probe All Started

Whilst Jim Jordan and his merry band of "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) in the U.S. House Judiciary Committee struggle with the understanding that they already know the origins of the Mueller investigation, the Senate Homeland Security is about to subpoena all your favorite, outlandish characters, and a few who are not, like My Memo Man, who shall commence to bearing false witness, under sworn oaths, in the public record, but, hey, what do I know?

I know Mittens knows.

Why not tell Lil' Jim how it all started.

#maytheheavensfall


Senate Republicans approve subpoenas for ex-Obama officials on Russia probe origins

Democrats are decrying the investigation as election-year politics meant to rewrite the narrative of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.

WASHINGTON – The Senate Homeland Security Committee on Thursday authorized the issuing of nearly three dozen subpoenas of Obama administration officials as part of Senate Republicans' investigation into the origins of the FBI and special counsel probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and the Trump campaign.

The Judiciary Committee, meanwhile, met to consider more than 50 additional subpoenas, but postponed action until next week.

Republicans on the panels are looking into flaws in FISA application process, the “unmasking” of Trump campaign and transition officials, including ex-national security adviser Michael Flynn, and the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign more broadly — actions that President Donald Trump has collectively dubbed “Obamagate” and dismissed as a "hoax" and a "witch hunt."

“There are times when extraordinary situations require action whether or not we all agree,” Homeland Security Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., said. “The conduct we know that occurred during the transition should concern everyone and absolutely warrants further investigation.”

Democrats are decrying the investigation as election-year politics meant to rewrite the narrative of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, which concluded that while the Trump campaign did not conspire with the Russians, it had numerous contacts with Russians and, in some cases, welcomed their assistance.

“I’m disappointed that our committee is once again meeting to discuss a partisan investigation,” said Homeland Security ranking Democrat Gary Peters of Michigan. “I’m concerned about the timing of this investigation that did not become a priority until we entered into an election year.”

Tom Carper, D-Del., said in a statement that he refused to attend the meeting out of frustration that the committee is “trying to score political points and help a president in an election year.”

While 35 subpoenas were authorized by the Homeland Security Committee along party lines, Republican Sens. Rob Portman of Ohio and Mitt Romney of Utah expressed reservations. Romney said he continues “to be concerned that this is politically motivated.”

The Homeland Security and Judiciary committees are considering issuing subpoenas for former CIA Director John Brennan, ex-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former FBI Director James Comey, former Obama chief of staff Dennis McDonough, former national security adviser Susan Rice and ex-FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

The Judiciary panel is also considering subpoenas for current FBI Director Christopher Wray and former Justice Department officials, including former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and ex-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

Judiciary member Ted Cruz, R-Texas, asked Democrats on the panel to consider how they would feel if the situation were reversed and the Trump administration were looking into the former Vice President Joe Biden's presidential campaign.

"Pause for a second and imagine how you would feel if Donald J Trump was doing exactly what Barack Obama and Joe Biden did," Cruz said. "So right now, are you guys copacetic with Trump putting wiretaps on the Joe Biden presidential campaign? Everything cool if Trump has the FBI send in agents wearing wires to the Joe Biden campaign? That's all good?"

On Wednesday, former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein testified before the Judiciary Committee as part of its probe. He said in hindsight he would not have approved a FISA warrant for Trump campaign official Carter Page, but continued to defend the Mueller probe

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

My Memo Man Rod Rosenstein Testifies On Mueller Russia Investigation

Watch Senate trying to figure out if they are part of the Mueller investigation.

Go forth, My Memo Man, for you were falsely advised by "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

Where is the JonesDay legal team representing the Trump Campaign.

#perkinscoiesucks

#sealsmatter

#maytheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, April 8, 2020

Linda Tripp Has Been Extracted From Humanity

Linda Tripp ran the Monica Lewinsky operation to redirect Whitewater in a series of absolute chaos of a sex scandal, between two legally consenting adults, to function as a distraction for the Adoption Safe Families Act (ASFA) and the Personal Work Responsibility Opportunity Reauthorizaiton Act (PRWORA), and it all started in Detroit.

Listen to Linda not talk about what is known as the corporate parent of the Arkansas Development Finance Authority, the fake ass parent of the Detroit Land Bank Authority.

You were mean to my Sweetie, which is never a good thing to do, now is it, Bitch Boy?

Where is Julian Epstein, of whom I prefer my own appellation of Slimy, Slime, Slime?

"Come out, come out, wherever you are..."

Where is George Bush?

These "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) attempted to run the exact, same, damn scheme in Detroit.

Idiots.


All Hail The Whistleblowers: Happy Whistleblower Day Greetings From Linda Tripp's FCPA Psyop



#perkinscoiesucks

#maytheheavensfall

Linda Tripp, whose tapes were pivotal in Clinton impeachment scandal, dies

(CNN)Linda Tripp, who secretly recorded her conversations with Monica Lewinsky about the then-intern's relationship with President Bill Clinton in the White House, has died, according to her mother, Inge Carotenuto, and her former attorney, Joseph Murtha.

Tripp had previously been treated for breast cancer. She was 70.

Tripp, a friend of Lewinsky's at the time, turned the 20 hours of tapes over to special prosecutor Kenneth Starr. The scandal ultimately led to Clinton's impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice, though he was ultimately acquitted in the Senate.

Lewinsky, despite their prior experiences, expressed well wishes to Tripp as reports indicated Wednesday that her health was failing.

"(No) matter the past, upon hearing that linda tripp is very seriously ill, i hope for her recovery. i can't imagine how difficult this is for her family," Lewinsky tweeted.

Lewinsky began to tell Tripp, a coworker of hers at the Pentagon, of her relationship with Clinton in the summer of 1996. Tripp began taping their conversations in the fall of 1997.

After contacting Starr about the tapes in January 1998, she met with Lewinsky again while wearing a wire, at which point Lewinsky coached Tripp on what to tell lawyers about Kathleen Willey, another former White House staffer who had testified about alleged unsolicited sexual advances made by Clinton in 1993.

When asked on Larry King Live in 2003 whether she regretted it, Tripp replied, "No, I would do it again."

"I told (Lewinsky) I would not fix a court case. I would not help fix a court case," Tripp said. "Yet I knew the President of the United States and Monica were intending to do that."

Speaking on the podcast "Slow Burn" in 2018, Tripp defended her actions as motivated by the idea that it would ultimately help Lewinsky.

"This was flying by the seat of my pants, terrified, out of my wits, completely guilt-ridden that I was having to manipulate her, but convinced in my soul that in the end it would benefit her. That he would no longer be able to do this to hurt anyone else," she recounted.

Tripp told the podcast that, at the time, she was being disingenuous while taping Lewinsky but only because she felt that she had to be.

"There wasn't a thing about those three months that were authentic. Everything prior to that was, but I needed everything to be recreated and it was beyond manipulative," she said. "Did I want to do that? Not necessarily, but I felt like I had no choice."

Tripp was open that she sought to go after Clinton, saying that Lewinsky's story established "a pattern of behavior that otherwise I believe wouldn't have had credibility" and that she "was eager for this information to fall into the hands of the Paula Jones attorneys," who sued the President on sexual harassment charges.

"But to say it was distasteful, to this day I have enormous guilt about" disseminating information to the press and FBI, she said.

"And of all the people I care about understanding, she's the one I wish I could convince," Tripp added, referring to Lewinsky. "And that'll never happen, so."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, March 2, 2020

Emperor Pence Introduces The Tale Of The Crown - Novel Coronavirus

Emperor Pence reassured the attendees of AIPAC that he was Johnny on the spot when it comes to the Public Private Partnership bridges he is going to build with Israeli private interests through the universities.

This was a major concern for the U.S. to end anti-semetic raves in universities, more intuitively understood of having their grant funding snatched for the things they do to the tiny humans.

NIH and CDC have hit those universities so, there are going to be people who want their tiny human research funding money back a-flowing.


Image result for chinese new year rat 2020
"Quid quo pro - I'll show you my data if you show me yours."
WHO has no datasets to build evidence based models in each community because the nations refuse to release their data.

Nope.

Nada data.

Clueless.

In the dark, with no chance to develop epidemiological community models.

Complete and utter chaos, with no chain of command for the keeper of the record, not even the census.


WHO: "How about we just go to the countries and just see what is going on to find out how to address each community? Until then, we advocate containment." 



Emperor Pence informs the public that he is taking over the well-being of the nation by informing the world that he has Medicaid set up and a therapeutic consortia is being put together to find out who is going to get the contracts.

The Emperor also got a private physician to advise him on public matters.

Not a physician from WHO, CDC, HHS or even DoD, but a private physician.

Yup.

Anyone see Tony Perkins, lately?

Situations such as this could interfere with a presidential election, but hey, what do I know?

I know the Emperor wants the crown and is spinning his bob to get it, but little does he know that he has no idea of how his tale ends.

Praise the lord.

Image result for coronation medival king
END OF UPDATE

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, January 11, 2020

Sharyl Attkisson Attempts To Assail The Armorial Of Rod Rosenstein

For the last few weeks, I have been observing what I like to call the team of Trollie Trolls, quite professional, who happen to like to forage through my archives.

I found them to be fascinating as their patterns were quickly identified.

Sometimes, I would even leave delightful morsels of information for them to digest, just so I could see what kind of crap they would excrete.

Well, lo and behold, it looks like we have a new queen of privatization, and thine name is Sharyl Attkisson.

Alas, the Errant Queen Sharyl (EQS) has given the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed the Great Saddy Face, for she attempts to defrock My Memo Man, Rod Rosenstein, and strip him of his right to bearing his armorialties.

Notice, I said, "attempts", because no one touches My Memo Man.

EQS, definitely not to be confused with 'esquire', has contemporaneously filed a suit of law against My Memo Man as he takes on his new roll in corporate litigation.

Rod Rosenstein Has New Friends In Baltimore

EQS deflated my excitement for Rod's new career in the filing of her action against him.

Former CBS Reporter Sharyl Attkisson announced yesterday that she is suing former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for illegally spying on her during the Obama year.  Rosenstein and other Deep State dirty cops are identified in her filing.

Yes, Boys & Girls, we are dealing with "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) for the following reasons:
  • The proper party would have been The United States;
  • She got her information from Twitter that does not even have blue check;
  • She was attempting to civilly sue the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, for criminal actions, based upon her reporting on active investigations, as a CBS reporter, where CBS obviously did not want to represent her, and lost her appeal;
  • She was never called to testify in congressional hearings;
  • She is the only one in the entire universe who has exposed:
    • Fast & Furious;
    • Benghazi;
    • Russiagate;
    • Ukrainegate; and,
    • Mueller Election Interference Investigation.
  • She was mean to my Sweetie, as seen in her propaganda video, below.

I just find it odd that she claims to be a seasoned reporter, yet has not once, reached out to me, or even cite my name, as the original source, to what she has stated as claims in her lawsuits.

She promulgates lies for money because it is quite obvious she is not doing this to further her career, because, if she was, she would not be engaging in such unethical activities as enjoining with the other co-conspirators.

I guess the old adage is true that some people will do anything for a dollar, but, now, she has the crap tank, Heritage Foundation, behind her, and My Memo Man has me to defend his honor.

Who said chivalry was gender specific?

If the lady wishes to repurpose herself as a regal, fake ass whistleblower, well, by golly, then the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed shall grant her wish and make her superstar.

From the looks of her claims, there seems to be viable possibility that she was under federal investigation for her questionable activities and associations.

FUN FACT! THE DAILY SIGNAL IS NOT REGISTERED IN ANY STATE AS A BUSINESS


That is correct, The Daily Signal is what I like to call a Corporate Shape Shifter, where the Heritage Foundation is using it as a front to fund political campaigns with foreign money, more than likely, from stealin' the children, land and vote.

I see the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a tool to use corporate parental rights for the trafficking of tiny humans,.

I also see Emperor Pence, which is why I have donned upon Sharyl, the appellation of EQS.


I will take the greatest pleasure running up your new employer's legal bills and shuttering that crap tank, and I will preserve your name in the annals of history, giving you all the credit.

You were mean to My Memo Man.

That is not nice; that is an act of sedition.

HERITAGE FOUNDATION LAUNCHES NATIONAL NEWS SITE FEATURING SHARYL ATTKISSON

2014_06_03_SAvideothumb-800x420WASHINGTON - What Illinois Review strives to do on a state issues level, Heritage Foundation is now launching at a national level - a new source of balanced news reporting. The Daily Signal has taken on CBS' ex-reporter Sharyl Attkisson as senior independent contributor. In an exclusive interview, Attkisson says the news media are heading down a dangerous path with attempts to “censor or block stories” that don’t align with their preferred agenda.

With major topics such as Benghazi, Common Core, Cronyism and ObamaCare, they'll be updating daily and adding to the national news front. From Bloomberg BusinessWeek:

Now Heritage has a new plan to exert its influence and, its leaders hope, win converts to the cause. On June 3 it will begin publishing the Daily Signal, a new digital news site whose primary focus will be straight reporting. “We came to the realization that the mainstream media had really abdicated the responsibility to do the news and do it well,” says Geoffrey Lysaught, vice president of strategic communications at the Heritage Foundation, who will also serve as publisher. The site aims to rectify the conservative perception that mainstream news slants to the left. “We plan to do political and policy news,” says Lysaught, “not with a conservative bent, but just true, straight-down-the-middle journalism.”

How does this help Heritage? The Daily Signal will also publish an opinion section aimed at a younger audience that isn’t thumbing through the editorial pages of theWall Street Journal. Heritage is betting that these readers, attracted to the Daily Signal’s news, will find themselves persuaded by the conservative commentary and analysis that will draw on the think tank’s scholars and researchers.






Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, January 9, 2020

Rod Rosenstein Has New Friends In Baltimore

Image result for rod rosenstein
"Watch me make history."
My Memo Man, Rod Rosenstein, is in Baltimore, in a corporate law firm, with lots of new friends and Sally Yates.

Can you say "Land Bank"?

How about 2018 election interference.

Perhaps, just perhaps, if we are all very nice, My Memo Man will say "gerrymandering".

I would throw out "drugs, weapons, and tiny humans", but that would give away the mystery as to why he took the position.

I never did like Sally Yates because she took a peculiar stance in a piece she wrote, while at DOJ, entitled, "Poverty is not a crime" and failed to acknowledge where she got that line, then turned around and bastardized it by not making one single reference to child welfare.

She was mean to my Sweetie.

It seems I did not preserve her writings, neither did the DOJ.

My Memo Man is busy, busy, busy.

Stay tuned.

Former U.S. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Joins King & Spalding as a Partner in Washington, D.C.

Rosenstein is the latest high-ranking Justice Department official to join the firm’s Special Matters & Government Investigations team; he will work closely with a deep bench of former federal prosecutors and senior government officials to help clients with their most challenging litigation, enforcement and reputational issues.

WASHINGTON, Jan. 8, 2020 — King & Spalding today announced that former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein joins the firm’s Washington, D.C., office as a partner on its Special Matters & Government Investigations team.

Rosenstein spent almost two decades in senior legal management and leadership positions at the U.S. Department of Justice during the administrations of Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump, including as Deputy Attorney General (2017 to 2019) and United States Attorney (2005 to 2017). Prior to his appointment as the Department’s second-highest ranking official, he was the longest-serving Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney in recent history.

“Rod Rosenstein is an exceptional trial lawyer, strategist and leader with unquestioned integrity and toughness,” said Robert D. Hays, Jr., chairman of King & Spalding. “His arrival underscores the firm’s longstanding commitment to effective advocacy on the most complex and highest stakes government-related matters. Our clients will benefit from the unique experience of Rod and other senior government officials working together as a team. His arrival reflects the firm’s intent to continue building leading practices led by extraordinary lawyers to serve clients on their most pressing and sensitive needs.”

With his vast prosecutorial and enforcement background, Rosenstein becomes another critical member of King & Spalding’s Special Matters & Government Investigations team, which assists clients—corporate, institutional and individual—in sensitive and reputational legal challenges, including many involving government agencies, legislative bodies or state Attorneys General. In the past two years, the firm has significantly ramped up the group with an all-star roster of former senior Justice Department officials, including former Deputy U.S. Attorney General Sally Yates, former U.S. Attorneys Zachary Fardon and John Horn, former Associate Deputy Attorney General Alicia O’Brien and former FBI Chief of Staff Zack Harmon. Other former senior officials recently joining the firm include former Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and former General Counsel for the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) and acting USTR Stephen Vaughn.

Rosenstein said, “I worked with many current and former firm lawyers in both Republican and Democratic administrations, and I learned that some of the best lawyers in the world work at King & Spalding. When considering where to go after leaving the Department of Justice, it became clear to me why so many former government officials choose this firm. With an unparalleled depth of experience across its practice groups and a long and distinguished record of success in courtrooms, King & Spalding is a bipartisan firm that focuses on helping clients resolve complex and sensitive matters in the United States and abroad. The inclusive and collaborative culture allows every client to benefit from the broad expertise and deep insight of more than 1,100 exceptional lawyers throughout the firm’s 21 offices. I look forward to working with my new colleagues to expand the firm’s government investigations, national security and cybersecurity practices.” 

As Deputy U.S. Attorney General, Rosenstein formulated and implemented Department policies and programs; coordinated interactions with the White House and other federal agencies, the Judiciary, and the Congress; interacted with state, local, and foreign government leaders; and provided supervision and direction to all Department components, including its litigating divisions and law enforcement agencies.

Rosenstein conducted complex investigations and handled litigation in trial and appellate courtrooms as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Department’s Tax Division (2001 to 2005), as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland (1997 to 2001), and as an Associate Independent Counsel (1995 to 1997).

Rosenstein started his legal career in 1989, as a law clerk to Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He first joined the Department of Justice as a trial attorney in the prestigious Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division (1990 to 1993), before serving as counsel to the Deputy Attorney General and the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division (1993 to 1995). In these and other roles, he received dozens of awards and honors for his performance. In addition, Rosenstein gained impressive trial experience while representing the United States at 23 jury trials and arguing 21 appeals in various appellate courts around the country, including the 2018 U.S. Supreme Court criminal case of Chavez-Meza v. United States, in which the Court ruled in favor of his argument.

“Rod deserves his well-earned reputation for being decisive and unflappable in extraordinary professional situations,” said Special Matters practice chair Wick Sollers. “His experiences conducting and supervising large criminal and civil litigation uniquely qualify him to counsel and defend clients facing complex investigations, lawsuits and enforcement matters. Clients will benefit from his big-picture perspective, as well as his insights from having updated, improved and formulated federal law enforcement policies on corporate and white-collar enforcement, national security, CFIUS and cyber-digital issues. King & Spalding’s Special Matters & Government Investigations team is stronger with his addition.”

Rosenstein graduated from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, with a B.S. in Economics, summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. He earned his J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School, where he was an editor of the Harvard Law Review.

About King & Spalding
Celebrating more than 130 years of service, King & Spalding is an international law firm that represents a broad array of clients, including half of the Fortune Global 100, with more than 1,100 lawyers in 21 offices in the United States, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. The firm has handled matters in over 160 countries on six continents and is consistently recognized for the results it obtains, uncompromising commitment to quality, and dedication to understanding the business and culture of its clients. More information is available at www.kslaw.com.

After Trump administration stint, Baltimore is still on Rod Rosenstein’s mind

As he takes a job with a high-profile law firm, Maryland’s former longtime U.S. Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein isn’t looking to talk much about his time with the Trump administration. He’s turned down book offers, and avoids questions on the subject.

If he did write a book, Rosenstein told The Baltimore Sun Wednesday, “it would probably be a lot about Baltimore.”

The city remains on the former deputy U.S. attorney general’s mind, after 12 years leading federal law enforcement efforts that he said were key to the city experiencing fewer than 200 homicides in 2011. (There were 348 homicides in the city last year.) He remains in touch with protege Robert K. Hur, who succeeded him as U.S. attorney for Maryland.

“It’s important for everybody at the federal, state and local level to agree that reducing murders is a priority,” Rosenstein said. “I’m hopeful they’ll get back to where we were before ... but it’s going to take a long time.”

The law firm of King & Spalding announced that Rosenstein will join its special government investigations team, following about eight months he spent with his family after stepping down as deputy attorney general. Rosenstein said it was Maryland’s former Republican governor Robert Ehrlich who helped connect him to the new job after they had lunch in the summer.

Rosenstein’s tumultuous two-year tenure included writing a memo supporting the firing of FBI Director James Comey and overseeing special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

[Read more] Before leaving Baltimore, Rod Rosenstein predicted he might not last long as deputy attorney general »
Of his tenure, Rosenstein said, “I’ve been out of government for eight months, and I’m on to a new career. ... I’m practicing law, not politics."

Rosenstein has continued to weigh in on Baltimore’s crime rates and on issues of law enforcement. On Jan. 1, he tweeted: “When Baltimore City prosecutors and police worked with federal and state partners to send every violent repeat offender to prison in 2011, only 197 people were murdered. Now criminals murder 350 victims and shoot hundreds more every year. WHAT CHANGED?”


Rosenstein maintains other ties to the city — he was scheduled to speak to a city law club, the Serjeants’ Inn, Wednesday night.

Rosenstein noted that the number of federal prosecutors in Baltimore increased significantly when he was No. 2 at the Justice Department.

“That’s not because I was showing favoritism; we had additional resources and were able to allocate them based on population and crime rates and need,” he said.

He said Hur is “doing a superb job,” and suggested, without citing specific agencies, that other law enforcement partners are not on the same page.

“If people are not being caught and prosecuted locally, they need to find out why that is,” Rosenstein said. “We had a decade of sustained improvements in Baltimore. We had improvements in Prince George’s County [as well] — the PG County improvements have stuck; they have not fallen back. Baltimore is worse today than when I got there 15 years ago.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, December 12, 2019

JUDICIARY: Impeachment - Day 2 - Enters Whitewater & Watergate - Will Judiciary Summon Judiciary From The Grave?


Whitewater& Watergate have officially been referenced into the public record as a precedent in conducting impeachment hearings.

Well, why should we call "Legal Geniuses (trademark pending)" when we can just subpoena the original sources, which, of course, includes staff.

Matt Gaetz dropped Hunter Biden's crackpipe.

I am quite sure there will be some form of psyoptic reprisal.

Matt Gaetz’s talk of mug shot raises questions about DUI arrest


Hank Johnson does not understand the origins of quid pro quo.

Ratcliffe just introduced Obama.

Ratcliffe refuses to mention the referrals to the Districts from the OIG.

#maytheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, December 9, 2019

DOJ & OIG: Statement by Attorney General William P. Barr on the Inspector General's Report of the Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation & Report

There is much more to come because there are the Ethics Referrals and all the other District Referrals from the OIG, including Durham, Huber, Mueller, SDNY, and the Detroit Grand Juries.

Oh. and Vladimir Putin has the other side of all of that which no one wishes to discuss, the trafficking of tiny humans.

And we have yet to find out how this all started...

Attorney General William P. Barr issued the following statement:
OIG FISA Report - Crossfire Hurricane 
"Nothing is more important than the credibility and integrity of the FBI and the Department of Justice.  That is why we must hold our investigators and prosecutors to the highest ethical and professional standards.  The Inspector General’s investigation has provided critical transparency and accountability, and his work is a credit to the Department of Justice.  I would like to thank the Inspector General and his team.
The Inspector General’s report now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken.  It is also clear that, from its inception, the evidence produced by the investigation was consistently exculpatory.  Nevertheless, the investigation and surveillance was pushed forward for the duration of the campaign and deep into President Trump’s administration.  In the rush to obtain and maintain FISA surveillance of Trump campaign associates, FBI officials misled the FISA court, omitted critical exculpatory facts from their filings, and suppressed or ignored information negating the reliability of their principal source.  The Inspector General found the explanations given for these actions unsatisfactory.  While most of the misconduct identified by the Inspector General was committed in 2016 and 2017 by a small group of now-former FBI officials, the malfeasance and misfeasance detailed in the Inspector General’s report reflects a clear abuse of the FISA process.
FISA is an essential tool for the protection of the safety of the American people.  The Department of Justice and the FBI are committed to taking whatever steps are necessary to rectify the abuses that occurred and to ensure the integrity of the FISA process going forward.
No one is more dismayed about the handling of these FISA applications than Director Wray.  I have full confidence in Director Wray and his team at the FBI, as well as the thousands of dedicated line agents who work tirelessly to protect our country.  I thank the Director for the comprehensive set of proposed reforms he is announcing today, and I look forward to working with him to implement these and any other appropriate measures.
With respect to DOJ personnel discussed in the report, the Department will follow all appropriate processes and procedures, including as to any potential disciplinary action."

Review of Four FISA Applications andOther Aspects of the FBI's CrossfireHurricane Investigation 


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

Lisa Page Has Disturbed My Memo Man, Rod Rosenstein

Egads!

How dare Lisa Page disturb My Memo Man, Rod Rosenstein.

The Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed is pleased, for My Memo Man bears the armorality of the U.S. Department of Justice to legally represent the United States.

Just because he is no longer an 'employee' of the United States, does not necessarily mean he is not beholden his oath of office.

You, also, swore an oath of office, Lisa, dear, but have breached the children's trust.

Do not let My Memo Man get all Ecclesiastic on your ass, because he is highly versed in the perfection of prayers and knows how to deliver My Memos to the heavens.

“To the best of my knowledge, career Department of Justice officials determined in December 2017 that those text messages were NOT personal,” he wrote. “They were official government records related to FBI business and there was no legal basis to withhold them, so they should be released as requested by Congress.” said My Memo Man

Lisa, precious, you made My Memo Man deliver a response to the Daily Beast.

Why would you do that, Lisa?

Memo Man does not come out for soundbytes or photo ops, like you, which means you gave him the Great Saddy Face.

So, you have Matt Whitaker, Trey Gowdy and now, Rod Rosenstein, who have perfected the Trinity of Seals to protect to children's trust, and that is why the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed is very pleased.

Unlike you, My Errant Knights are not going to desecrate their sworn oaths, which is what you have done, Lisa.

We have a name, and statutes, for that, called treason.

Ooooooo.......that was not a good thing to do, Lisa.


#maytheheavensfall

Rod Rosenstein: DOJ ‘Not to Blame’ for Lisa Page’s Abuse

DON’T LOOK AT US

"May the heavens fall to protect the children's trust."
said Rod "My Memo Man" Rosenstein
The former deputy attorney general says he had no choice but to release Page’s texts with FBI agent Peter Strzok.

Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said Monday that ex-FBI lawyer Lisa Page should not blame the Department of Justice for the abuse she has suffered at the hands of Donald Trump and his allies.

Rosenstein’s comments come in response to an exclusive interview with Page by Daily Beast contributor Molly Jong-Fast, in which Page blasted the Justice Department for making public texts between her and agent Peter Strzok.

Page alleged the messages—in which Page and Strzok, who were having an affair, belittled then-candidate Donald Trump—were chosen and released for political impact. Trump went on to publicly ridicule the “lovers” over and over again in the two years since their release.

In a statement to The Daily Beast, Rosenstein said that there was no political motive to the disclosure and that he had no choice but to release the texts, which had been the subject of an Inspector General’s investigation into possible political bias.

“To the best of my knowledge, career Department of Justice officials determined in December 2017 that those text messages were NOT personal,” he wrote. “They were official government records related to FBI business and there was no legal basis to withhold them, so they should be released as requested by Congress.”

Rosenstein said the IG’s office had “no objection” to releasing the messages.

“I consistently defended the right of Department of Justice employees to express political opinions and even make political contributions,” he continued. “However, the Inspector General concluded that the FBI employees ‘demonstrated extremely poor judgment and a gross lack of professionalism’ by exchanging messages that ‘appeared to mix political opinions with discussions about the [Hillary Clinton email] and Russia investigations, raising a question as to whether Strzok’s and Page’s political opinions may have affected investigative decisions.’”

“Ms. Page received more opprobrium than she deserved for her mistakes,” he added. “But the Department of Justice is not to blame.”

In her interview, Page says the release of the text messages destroyed life as she knew it, driving her out of the FBI and making her a Trump rally punchline.

“It’s like being punched in the gut. My heart drops to my stomach when I realize he has tweeted about me again. The president of the United States is calling me names to the entire world. He’s demeaning me and my career. It’s sickening,” she said.

“But it’s also very intimidating because he’s still the president of the United States. And when the president accuses you of treason by name, despite the fact that I know there’s no fathomable way that I have committed any crime at all, let alone treason, he’s still somebody in a position to actually do something about that. To try to further destroy my life. It never goes away or stops, even when he’s not publicly attacking me.”

Her complaints apparently fell on deaf ears at the White House. In an apparent reaction to The Daily Beast story, Trump tweeted about Page on Monday afternoon.

Roger Stone Guilty of Lying to Congress to Protect Trump
“When Lisa Page, the lover of Peter Strzok, talks about being ‘crushed’, and how innocent she is, ask her to read Peter’s “Insurance Policy” text, to her, just in case Hillary loses,” he wrote. “Also, why were the lovers text messages scrubbed after he left Mueller. Where are they Lisa?”

The text Trump referred to was from Strzok to Page and read: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office—that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…”

While Trump and his allies have claimed this is proof of a “deep-state” conspiracy against him, Page and Strzok have testified that it actually referred to Strzok’s belief the Russia investigation should be on the fast-track and not put on a slow burn because it appeared unlikely, at that point, that Trump would win.

Trump has also alleged that text messages from Page and Strzok were deliberately erased because, he said, they would have discredited Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. Politifact reported that an outside expert hired by the Justice Department inspector general found technical glitches likely accounted for the missing messages.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, September 30, 2019

No FOIA For Duggan Investigation, But There Is A Video

If you record the meetings, you can use their own words against them.

Sometimes, wearing a wire is just another way of preserving the historic record since people in positions of authority seem to have issues recently about bearing false witness in the historic record.

Just ask Mike Duggan about that.

The City could email the documents, but that would not be conducive when it comes to covering up child welfare fraud.

Besides, if this has to do with child welfare, those records are sealed.

Thank you, Tony, for the lovely video with the time stamp.

Nice touch.

City puts $222K price tag on Duggan investigation records; flouts state law


Secret video: Carmack secretly records Duggan probe interview
Robert Carmack recorded his meeting with Detroit's inspector general because, he says, he doesn't trust the probe of the mayor will be impartial.

The Detroit inspector general's investigation into Mayor Mike Duggan is in its final stages. The Free Press is seeking records of the probe.

Mayor Duggan's ties to Sonia Hassan include Make Your Date program
An email obtained in a Free Press investigation shows mayor ordered special attention for a nonprofit run by Dr. Sonia Hassan, with whom he's linked.

Anearly six-month investigation into whether Mayor Mike Duggan gave preferential treatment to a local maternal health program is in its final stages and involves more than 400,000 pages of documents, the Free Press has learned.

The Free Press sought the Detroit Office of Inspector General’s investigative records — emails, text messages, financial reports and other documents it has collected as well as newly created reports — through a public records request last month, but the city’s law department said the newspaper would have to foot a bill estimated at $222,667 to obtain them.

Even if the Free Press pays the six-figure invoice, the city plans to fight releasing documents that the inspector general’s office has collected. The investigation involves Duggan and Make Your Date, the maternal health program run by Sonia Hassan, a woman with close ties to the mayor. Duggan initiated the nonprofit program; recommended Hassan to lead it, and ordered high-ranking city officials to help with fundraising. Make Your Date received more than $358,000 in federal grant money through the city.

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) wants to keep the records secret while the investigation is ongoing so they are not used to “mislead the public.”

“Based on information provided by the OIG … release of the requested information and/or record at this time would: 1) paint a biased picture without any context; 2) unfairly prejudice innocent employees and individuals who are identified in the records; and 3) be taken out of context to sensationalize certain aspects of the records and mislead the public,” reads a Sept. 10 letter to the Free Press from the Detroit law department in response to the newspaper’s records request on Aug. 20.

The letter notes that 400,000 pages of records have been gathered and concedes that the state’s public records law may not justify withholding the records. “While specific exemptions under Michigan FOIA may not apply to the records compiled by the OIG, it is our understanding that the OIG will defend its position if necessary,” a footnote in the letter reads.

The city’s letter responding to the Free Press request sheds new light on the high-profile investigation and underscores the complicated relationship between the city’s administration and Inspector General Ellen Ha.

More: Mayor Mike Duggan set her up to succeed. That raises questions.

More: City fundraising office deleted emails about nonprofit tied to Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan

The OIG is supposed to be the city’s independent watchdog, but staff there collaborated with the city’s law department to object to releasing the records to the Free Press. Ha previously worked in the city’s law department, raising concerns about her objectivity.

Deputy Inspector General Kamau Marable said Friday that the office's objections are not specific to the investigation involving Duggan and Make Your Date.

"We are not opposing the (FOIA) request perpetually," Marable said. "Our concern is the information being released while an investigation is ongoing and that's every investigation — high-profile or not. Every investigation we feel that way and will take that stance."

The investigation encompasses whether the city and Duggan provided Make Your Date with any preferential treatment. The probe expanded in July after the Free Press revealed that city workers deleted emails related to Make Your Date and Hassan, while the newspaper prepared its first report on the mayor’s relationship with the program and Hassan.

The inspector general’s office said it would investigate the circumstances surrounding the deleted emails as part of its overall investigation into Make Your Date.

Duggan and Dave Massaron, the city’s chief financial officer, learned about the deleted emails in May.

During an unrelated meeting with Free Press editors and reporters Thursday, Massaron would not comment on whether the inspector general has interviewed him or how he found out about the deleted emails.

“We have been asked by the Office of the Inspector General not to comment until she completes the investigation. So I can’t,” Massaron said.

When asked whether he has ever known any city officials to delete emails to avoid public disclosure, Massaron also cited the inspector general’s instructions to remain quiet. When pressed, he said, “I’m unaware of anybody deleting emails to avoid discussion, disclosure.”

DOCUMENT
PAGES
Zoom

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel also has instructed her criminal division to look into the deleted emails after the issue was brought to her personal attention.

Although the OIG investigation is in its final stages, it could be a while before a final report is issued because any person or agency criticized in the preliminary report has the right to a closed-door appeal hearing, according to the inspector general's administrative rules. The appeals process could take several weeks.

The inspector general’s office would not provide any details about the investigation, only characterizing it as ongoing.

The office confirmed that it raised concerns with the law department about the Free Press’ FOIA request.

“Unless required to do so, we do not discuss or share any information we’ve collected during our investigation with any persons outside of our agency,” an email from the inspector general’s office reads. “Preserving the integrity of our investigation under the charter requires our silence until a final report is issued by our office.”

The city charter's requirement that inspector general records be kept confidential is subject to state law, including the FOIA statute, which supersedes local rules and laws.

The Free Press appealed the law department's FOIA response last week. The appeal cited several areas where the city's response appeared to violate state statutes and it requested specific legal justifications for documents that were denied.

The inspector general has the authority to investigate any elected official, city employee, agencies and any programs or contractors who provide goods or services to Detroit.

According to the city charter, the inspector general also has the ability to access financial and other records of all city agencies at any time.

During the course of an investigation, the office can administer oaths, take testimonies, subpoena witnesses and require the "production of evidence relevant to a matter under investigation," according to the city charter.

Any city employee, elected official or contractor who fails to cooperate with an investigation could be subject to "forfeiture of office, discipline, debarment or any other applicable penalty.”

If it is determined that an illegal act was committed, the inspector general is required to refer the matter to the appropriate law enforcement agencies.

Viki Harrison, director of state operations for the nonpartisan grassroots organization Common Cause, said the city’s handling of the FOIA response raises new transparency questions and damages the public’s trust.

Harrison read the city’s FOIA response to the Free Press and said it is inappropriate for the law department to chastise the media by suggesting it would attack innocent employees.

“Are they writing an op-ed or is this a FOIA response?" Harrison said.

Harrison said the city’s response erodes trust in government.

“I'm outraged just reading some of the language that they've used in here,” she said. “They're being incredibly defensive instead of just doing their jobs and answering the question. The public is going to once again think that their government is hiding something and not playing fair and they're stopping the press from doing their jobs. The lack of transparency and ability for the public to really understand what’s happening is completely erased when you get a response like this.”

The inspector general's office said there should be no transparency concerns.

"We have stated that we have no issues with releasing information after the investigation is concluded," the office wrote in an email responding to questions from the Free Press. "As stated previously this is to protect the integrity of any investigation, high profile or otherwise."

Harrison said she also believes the $222,667 price tag to fulfill the request prevents access to documents that should legally be available for public consumption.

“It is obviously outrageous to charge a newspaper $225,000 for something that is going to be nothing but redactions,” Harrison said. “Charging for staff time is a huge problem, too. If your Information Act requires and allows them to charge to compile information, that should be changed. That is something that makes it cost prohibitive for anyone to use this law to get the information they’re entitled to. How is anybody supposed to be able to afford $200,000?”

Make Your Date investigation


“Any time an inspector general is investigating any type of allegation of wrongdoing, that’s just inherently in the public interest,” Marshall said.

The city’s position that it would fight releasing the records despite any legal justification is “patently unlawful,” Marshall said.

“They seem to readily admit that no Michigan FOIA exemption applies but they’re not going to release these records,” he said. “The letter seems to be flouting that legal obligation on the basis of some purported policy argument. That’s not a legal reason that allows those records to be withheld.

“I’m really at a loss to understand how the city thinks this is appropriate or lawful.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©