Showing posts sorted by relevance for query tony perkins. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query tony perkins. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Morality is not a smorgasbord; you can’t pick what you want

That's right.  "Morality is not a smorgasbord; you can’t pick what you want".  These are the words of Tony Perkins, head honcho of the Family Research Council.

See, people must be told what they want.  They must be led.  The age old "Shepherd-Sheep" model seen in Christianity.

The Family Research Council are supporters of the Parental Rights Amendment, along with ALEC and a few other conservative religious extremists.  This has nothing to do about children, it is about the industry of child welfare.  It is about profiting off children.  Usufruct.

These people have defined "family" as a married woman and man.  Anything else is subject to a CPS action call.  This, is the acquisition of goods: child removal.  Remember, children need both parents

These are the ones who want to remove government from education, as I like to call it, the "Dumbing of America."  Alexander the Great was the one who implemented the first public education model.  Perhaps it is because of his sexual orientation that they want to end public education.

It does not matter.  I was in the trenches with these people when they first started their assent to power.  I know what I am talking about.  This is child abuse propaganda, disguised at its finest.

Witness an entirely new landscape of child abuse propaganda: politics.

The profit opportunities will be shared by all, conservative, liberals, independents and those who just want to keep a roof over their heads.  Making money off the week is a non-partisan, moral thang.

Family Research Council Blames Secret Service Scandal on Obama Repealing 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'
article image

Yesterday Janet Mefferd hosted Family Research Council president Tony Perkins on her radio show, where Perkins tied last year’s repeal of the 'Don’t Ask Don’t Tell' rule in the military to the recent scandal involving Secret Service agents who solicited prostitutes in Colombia.

Perkins claimed that since the President Obama has been “enforcing open homosexuality in our military” then he should not have been “upset” about the prostitution scandal, maintaining that Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’s repeal led to “a total breakdown” in “moral order."

Perkins failed, once again, to mention that Congress repealed Don't Ask, Don''t Tell with the full support of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen.

Perkins said: "The same is true for what the President has done to the military enforcing open homosexuality in our military. You can change the law but you can’t change the moral law that’s behind it. You can change the positive law, the law that is created by man, but you can’t change the moral law, it’s wrong."

"So what you have is you have a total breakdown and you can’t pick and choose. Morality is not a smorgasbord; you can’t pick what you want. I think you’re absolutely right, this is a fundamental issue going forward because if we say ‘let them do what we want,’ what’s next? You cannot maintain moral order if you are willing to allow a few things to slide."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Did Teresa Manning Get Walked Out HHS For Leaking Child Welfare Data To Israel?

Why was Teresa Manning formally escorted from HHS?

I am going to go with my final answer: fraud.

I do not believe she had any hands on the Title X grant decisions or was even there long enough to masterfully navigate the Department, but I bet your bottom dollar she was "leaking" data to her special buddy Tony Perkins.

Yes, that Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, the same one who was the largest political campaign contributor to Mike Pence's gubernatorial campaigns.

The same Mike Pence who has an interesting background in trafficking tiny humans.

I bet she made some backdoor lobbying money leaking human data to be transferred to private, foreign corporate interests, like Israel, through a so-called child welfare NGO,  but hey, what do I know?

Anti-birth control official who led Title X departs HHS

Jury rejects conservative's bias suit against UI dean
Teresa Manning
Teresa Manning, the controversial official in charge of the Title X federal family planning program, was escorted from HHS premises on Friday.

Two sources with knowledge of Manning's departure tell POLITICO that she was fired by HHS. An HHS spokesperson disputed that account, saying that Manning resigned.

"HHS is very grateful for her service," the spokesperson said. "Her departure after resignation was not unusual in any way."

Manning could not be reached for comment.

Manning, who previously worked for anti-abortion groups including the Family Research Council and National Right to Life, had been serving as deputy assistant secretary for HHS' Office of Population Affairs. In that role, she was responsible for helping set national policy around family planning, contraception and teen pregnancy — a development that alarmed abortion-rights groups worried about Manning's history of statements and actions opposing birth control and abortion.

Manning stated in a 2003 public radio interview that "contraception doesn't work." She also has separately suggested a link between abortion and breast cancer, which has not been proven, and helped craft state legislation to limit access to abortion.

Manning's name was removed from OPA's leadership page on Friday night. She had been tapped in May 2017 to lead the office, which has been criticized by state officials in recent months. OPA's process to allow states to apply for family-planning grants is running more than two months behind schedule.

Valerie Huber, who had been serving as chief of staff for the HHS' assistant secretary of health, was named acting deputy assistant security of OPA. Huber is an advocate for abstinence education who joined HHS in June 2017.

A source with knowledge of Manning's dismissal said that staff were told to leave the floor of the HHS building and to take their computers, in order to ensure that no one witnessed her being escorted out.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, December 20, 2019

Will SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts Recuse Himself From Trump Impeachment Proceedings?

FUN FACT! U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS WILL CEREMONIOUSLY PRESIDE OVER THE TRUMP IMPEACHMENT

John Roberts needs to recuse himself on all those U.S. Census Citizenship, DACA & DAPA cases because he is biased...in an act of self-preservation of his trafficking tiny human issues.

Come to think about it, John needs to be called to testify in Trump's impeachment hearing because of all that crap Tony Perkins has been promulgating about RFRA in falsely advising Pence.

I would be remiss if I did not include one of my favorite operatives, Laura Ingraham, and her work on promulgating the Magnistky Act & the trafficking of tiny humans.

This is about RFRA and parental rights.

From 2005

Investigating the Roberts Children



Isn’t it interesting that a reporter with the last name of “Justice” is the one who investigated the children of Judge John Roberts? Referring to a report that New York Times investigative reporter Glen Justice was prying into the private adoption records of Roberts’ two children, radio talk-show host Kevin McCullough declared that “Every adoptive parent reading this will be understandably outraged, and they should be. Every decent human being in every decent family across this nation should speak up. And every person subscribing to the New York Times should think about whether or not they want to continue to do so.”

In a column carried by Illinoisleader.com, McCullough said, “The reason that such tactics get played out over and over is because the Times and other elements of the liberal dominated media feel they will suffer no foul consequence in doing so. Their idea is journalism has little to do with reporting the facts as much as it has to do with Democratic Party-friendly witch hunts that can be carried out without indictment for any wrongdoing. By conducting such an inquiry into the personal and private lives of Supreme Court nominee Roberts, his wife and the process they went through to become parents, the Times seems to be setting a new low-like they have been prone to in recent years-in its lack of journalistic standards.”

The National Council for Adoption issued a statement denouncing, “in the strongest possible terms, the shocking decision of the New York Times to investigate the adoption records of Justice John Roberts’ two young children. The adoption community is outraged that, for obviously political reasons, the Times has targeted the very private circumstances, motivations, and processes by which the Roberts became parents.




But Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, Vice Chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, said she was “appalled to learn that reporters for the New York Times had started an investigation into the adoption records of U.S. Supreme Court nominee John Roberts and his wife.  Simple decency dictates that some boundaries should be placed on inquiries into the private lives of public figures by interest groups and the news media.”

She added, “In my view, this inquiry by the Times-no matter how preliminary the newspaper now says it was-steps over that boundary line.  I note the paper initially claimed this misstep was inadvertent.  But it has now been reported that the newspaper consulted its lawyers to determine ways to unseal court adoption records of the Roberts family.  In my view, this is reprehensible.”

Hutchison said this was not the first time that coverage of Roberts went “over the line.” She explained that she was disgusted by a half-page Washington Post story “deriding the apparel worn by the Roberts children when their father’s nomination was announced at the White House.” She noted that the Los Angeles Times “ran a lengthy story examining private activities of Mrs. Roberts that were largely irrelevant to her husband’s nomination.”

Hutchison concluded, “I hope everyone involved in the confirmation process will take a deep breath and consider carefully the fine line between legitimate background inquiries and invasion of privacy in such cases.  In the meantime, I will encourage the Congressional Coalition on Adoption, of which I’m a member, to take a position opposing inquiries such as those started by the New York Times.”

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, commented on the Times inquiry by saying that “?it should be agreed by all, especially Democrats and newspapers sympathetic to Democratic causes, that attacking family is repugnant. What kind of people would assault Judge Roberts through his children? What kind of people would publish vicious attacks on his little boy and little girl for how they were dressed? What kind of people would try to get at a judicial nominee because of the occupation or work of their spouse? Or attempt to dredge up damaging material through private adoption records? The unfortunate answer is they are the kind of people who have been picking our judges for years. They are also the people who will be picking our future judges unless we stay active today.”

These “people” are mostly in the media. They do these things because they are not being held accountable.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, March 25, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown: TARP 2.0 To Roll Out In Detroit

I truly hope you take great pride in knowing I did this in one breath, and did not pass out in constructing my response to TARP 2.0, by which these people taunt me, calling it Families First Coronavirus Recovery Act.

The ukrainians did not waste any time setting up their fraud schemes, oops, I mean lending. See, those loans to the bank from the Treasury are going to be forgiven, but the loans from the bank to the small businesses will not, so they can foreclose on them after the businesses do renovation, new stock, new marketing campaigns, you know, turnkey shops, so they can turn around and sell them to other foreign corporations through fake ass LLCs, so they can take out small business loans, where the federal government will forgive the loans to the bank, but the bank will not forgive for the small business, then foreclose on them, wiping out the debt, so they can sell it to another fake ass LLC...... and the cycle becomes eternal because they will go through the Detroit Land Bank Authority by and through the Archdiocese of Detroit, to run the money through lots of trafficking tiny human NGOs like Catholic Charities, and other foster care and adoption agencies, who are the ones who will be buying up these foreclosed small businesses with their fake ass LLCs to fund political campaigns, to pass more asset forfeiture laws, so they can come up with more fake ass LLCs to .....
[breathe.....breathe....breathe...]

These people taunt me.

These people think they are funny.

This is JonesDay & Perkins Coie Sucks in full spectacle.

This is TARP 2.0 and they went full force in letting the world know that they are claiming their foreign corporate Parental Rights.

This is gerrymandering on steroids and you know what that is...stealin' the children, land & vote.

This is what happens when you get a federal emergency manager.

Emperor Pence is just an magnus of Kevyn Orr.

Listen to him tell you exactly what he was planning to do to the nation, starting @12:15


Emperor Pence campaigning at the Detroit Economic Club on his path to claim the crown as Emergency Manager to launch TARP 2.0.

Hey, they got away with TARP, so why not do it again.

This is about Parental Rights.

Where is Tony Perkins?

#maytheheavensfall

Wayne Co, TCF Bank roll out small business relief loan fund amid coronavirus

WAYNE COUNTY, Mich. (FOX 2) - Wayne County and TCF have partnered to quickly provide thousands of dollars to small businesses in the county who now find themselves struggling amid the Covid-19 pandemic.

The $10 million partnership is targeted to help small businesses in low income census tracts that have been hardest hit. Loans up to $50,000 with interest rates between 0 - 2% will be made to eligible to Wayne County businesses in need.

The Wayne County program is designed to help these small businesses get immediate financial help during the pandemic.

While recent federal government programs have thankfully been enacted to help small businesses, Wayne County and TCF realized such funds may not be dispersed quick enough to provide needed relief and ensure small businesses are able to pay wages, rent, utilities and stay operational.

LOAN DETAILS
Loan amounts will be available between $5,000 and $50,000 with interest rates ranging between 0 - 2%.

All loans will have a 12-month term with interest-only payments for the first six months and regular payments afterward. At the end of 12 months, the loan will be paid in a single balloon payment.

In order to qualify for the loan, your business must:

Employ less than 100 employees
Have annual revenue under $1 million
Reside in a low income census tract in Wayne County

For more information, contact one of the 15 Wayne County TCF Bank & Chemical Bank banking centers.

Loan application and a list of banking centers located in Wayne County can be found at tcfbank.com/waynecounty and chemicalbank.com/waynecounty.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, July 8, 2019

Mike Pompeo Pushes Corporate Parental Rights As The Unalienable Right - Meet Mary Ann Glendon, Representing The Holy See

This is about parental rights, the acquisition of goods, where those goods are tiny humans.

This is about corporate parental rights for asset forfeiture of a civil debt by foreign entities to steal the children, the land and the votes.

This is about corporations being animated to have christian beliefs of chattel law as an individual.

This is about the re-engineering of the residuals of the peculiar institution.

Pompeo is from Kansas.

Do not forget that.

Mike Pompeo unveils panel to examine 'unalienable rights'

Mike Pompeo
Mike 
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday unveiled a new Commission on Unalienable Rights, a panel he said is aimed at providing him with “an informed review of the role of human rights in American foreign policy.”

The panel will be headed up by Mary Ann Glendon, a Harvard law professor and former ambassador to the Vatican under George W. Bush. Glendon is also a social conservative who has been a prominent anti-abortion voice, which could lend credence to the concerns among human rights activists that the commission is a ploy to undercut LGBTQ and women’s rights under the guise of religious liberty.

Can you get anymore obviously biased?

In remarks at the State Department on Monday, Pompeo noted that “words like ‘rights’ can be used by good or evil,” decrying how some have “hijacked” human rights rhetoric to be used for “dubious or malignant purposes.”

Glendon, in brief comments, echoed that, telling reporters that "basic human rights are misunderstood by many, manipulated by many, and ignored by the world’s worst human rights violators."

“Every once in a while we need to step back, and reflect seriously on where we are, where we’ve been and whether we’re headed in the right direction,” Pompeo said. He hailed former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt’s 1948 Declaration on Universal Human Rights as one of the foundational documents for the commission’s work, but noted that the panel would serve as advisers as opposed to policymakers.

While Pompeo was vague in laying out what exactly the panel will do, emphasizing its focus on “principles” over “policy,” he praised its members as those he hoped would facilitate "one of the most profound reexaminations of the unalienable rights in the world since the 1948 universal declaration."

The commission will be made up of 10 members who represent a range of religious backgrounds. Many are religious scholars, with at least one other joining Glendon in having been appointed to represent the Vatican on social issues in the past. One, Hamza Yusuf, is one of the founders of the first Muslim liberal arts college in America. Another, Christopher Tollefsen, specializes in moral philosophy, natural law ethics, practical ethics and bioethics.

Pompeo indicated that the panel could also be used in part to rein in overzealous invocations of human rights, suggesting the group “revisit the most basic of questions: What does it mean to say or claim that something is in fact a human right?”

“How do we know — or how do we determine — whether that claim ... is it true and therefore ought it to be honored? How can there be human rights rights we possess, not as privileges we are granted or even earn, but simply by virtue of our humanity belong to us?” he asked. “Is it in fact true, as our Declaration of Independence asserts, that as human beings we — all of us, every member of our human family — are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights?”

In an op-ed published Monday morning in the Wall Street Journal, the secretary expressed hope that the group would “reorient” institutions like the UN “back to their original missions.”

“Many have embraced and even accelerated the proliferation of rights claims—and all but abandoned serious efforts to protect fundamental freedoms,” he wrote, complaining that “human-rights advocacy has lost its bearings and become more of an industry than a moral compass.”

Reactions to the new panel were split on Monday. In a statement cheering Pompeo‘s formation of the commission, Tony Perkins, head of the conservative Christian group Family Research Council, said that the panel would be useful in light of governments like Cuba, China and Iran who the group said "have wormed their way onto 'human rights commissions' in their search for international legitimacy."

"Other special interest groups have sought to expand the definition of a 'human right' to include virtually anything. If everything is a human right then the term begins to have little meaning," he said.

In addition, Perkins added, the commission would further promote religious liberty abroad, which he hailed as the "foundation for all other human rights."

Amnesty International, meanwhile, accused Pompeo of using the panel to politicize human rights and pointed to the Trump administration’s rollback of rights for LGBTQ citizens.

"If this administration truly wanted to support people's rights, it would use the global framework that's already in place. Instead, it wants to undermine rights for individuals, as well as the responsibilities of governments," said Joanne Lin, the group’s national director of advocacy and government affairs. "This approach only encourages other countries to adopt a disregard for basic human rights standards and risks weakening international, as well as regional frameworks, placing the rights of millions of people around the world in jeopardy."

And at least one religious group said it was viewing the commission’s formation with skepticism. Rori Kramer, director of government affairs for the American Jewish World Service, criticized Pompeo for employing what she called a “narrow view of religion as a means to undermine the ecumenical belief of respecting the dignity of every person.”

Kramer argued that Pompeo “clearly illustrated” the panel “will be used to question the very notion that basic human rights are inherent in all individuals.”

A pair of congressional Democrats also ripped the commission.

House Foreign Affairs Chairman Eliot Engel said in a statement Monday that the new panel amounted to an end-run around established structures within the department, and touted an amendment in a House spending bill passed last month that would block funding for "this bizarre effort."

He claimed that the group Pompeo had selected would "give preference to discriminatory ideologies that would narrow protections for women, including on reproductive rights; for members of the LGBTQI community; and for other minority groups," and he hit the secretary for providing little information regarding plans for the commission.

And Sen. Bob Menendez, the top ranking Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, called Pompeo's claims that human rights had been manipulated "absurd" and asserted the new commission would only weaken human rights.

"President Trump’s personal affection for gross human rights violators has stained America’s moral fabric," he said, pointing to the president's praise for leaders such as North Korea's Kim Jong Un and the Philippines' Rodrigo Duterte. "No Trump Administration commission can erase that."


Former US ambassador to Holy See to chair new human rights commission


Mary Ann Glendon lectures at Harvard University. Credit: Harvard Law Records (CC BY 2.0).
Mary Ann Glendon
Washington D.C., Jul 8, 2019 / 02:00 pm (CNA).- Mary Ann Glendon, former U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See, will head a new human rights advisory body to the U.S. State Department, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced on Monday.

“It’s a sad commentary on our times that more than 70 years after the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, gross violations continue throughout the world,” Secretary Pompeo stated at a July 8 press conference announcing the new Commission on Unalienable Human Rights.

Pompeo said that “the time is right for an informed review of American human rights in foreign policy,” and that Glendon was “the perfect person to chair this effort” and chair the new commission.

Glendon, a former U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See in 2008-09, is a Harvard Law professor with expertise in international human rights.

She was named to the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences by Pope St. John Paul II in 1994, led a delegation of the Holy See to the fourth U.N. Women’s Conference in Beijing in 1995, and served as head of the Pontifical Academy of the Sciences from 2004-14. In 2018, she resigned as a memeber of the Board of Superintendence, which oversees the IOR, commonly known as the Vatican Bank.

Glendon also served as a commissioner on the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom from 2012 until 2016, appointed by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

During Monday’s press conference, Glendon thanked Pompeo “for giving a priority to human rights at this moment when basic human rights are being misunderstood by many, manipulated by many, and ignored by the world’s worst human rights violators.”

The commission, according to Secretary Pompeo, will be an advisory body made up of human rights experts, philosophers and others from across the political spectrum, with the core mission of advancing  “our nation’s founding principles and the principles of 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights.”

In addition to Glendon, commission members include Notre Dame Law professor Paolo Carozza; Katrina Lantos Swett, former chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom; and philosopher Christopher Tollefsen.

In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal on Sunday, Secretary Pompeo noted current confusion between “inalienable” rights and those granted by governments, and how contemporary discourse has confused the two with people “appealing to contrived rights for political advantage.”

“Human-rights advocacy has lost its bearings and become more of an industry than a moral compass,” he wrote, adding that institutions like the United Nations, tasked with upholding fundamental human rights, have contributed to the confusion.

Pompeo added on Monday that the commission members “will provide the intellectual grist for what I hope will be one of the most profound reexaminations of the unalienable rights in the world since the 1948 Declaration.”

“I hope that the commission will revisit the most basic of questions: What does it mean to say or claim that something is, in fact, a human right? How do we know or how do we determine whether that claim that this or that is a human right, is it true, and therefore, ought it to be honored?” Pompeo said.

“How can there be human rights, rights we possess not as privileges we are granted or even earn, but simply by virtue of our humanity belong to us? Is it, in fact, true, as our Declaration of Independence asserts, that as human beings, we – all of us, every member of our human family – are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights?”


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, March 2, 2020

Emperor Pence Introduces The Tale Of The Crown - Novel Coronavirus

Emperor Pence reassured the attendees of AIPAC that he was Johnny on the spot when it comes to the Public Private Partnership bridges he is going to build with Israeli private interests through the universities.

This was a major concern for the U.S. to end anti-semetic raves in universities, more intuitively understood of having their grant funding snatched for the things they do to the tiny humans.

NIH and CDC have hit those universities so, there are going to be people who want their tiny human research funding money back a-flowing.


Image result for chinese new year rat 2020
"Quid quo pro - I'll show you my data if you show me yours."
WHO has no datasets to build evidence based models in each community because the nations refuse to release their data.

Nope.

Nada data.

Clueless.

In the dark, with no chance to develop epidemiological community models.

Complete and utter chaos, with no chain of command for the keeper of the record, not even the census.


WHO: "How about we just go to the countries and just see what is going on to find out how to address each community? Until then, we advocate containment." 



Emperor Pence informs the public that he is taking over the well-being of the nation by informing the world that he has Medicaid set up and a therapeutic consortia is being put together to find out who is going to get the contracts.

The Emperor also got a private physician to advise him on public matters.

Not a physician from WHO, CDC, HHS or even DoD, but a private physician.

Yup.

Anyone see Tony Perkins, lately?

Situations such as this could interfere with a presidential election, but hey, what do I know?

I know the Emperor wants the crown and is spinning his bob to get it, but little does he know that he has no idea of how his tale ends.

Praise the lord.

Image result for coronation medival king
END OF UPDATE

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, December 19, 2019

Trump Impeachment Re-election Campaign Rally - Battle Creek, Michigan

Trump holds his impeachment campaign rally in Battle Creek, Michigan.

The impeachment campaign Emperor of Ceremonies was Pence.

When Trump in impeached from office, Pence takes the throne.

I am pretty darn sure Pence has christiian "boots on the ground"  in Michigan, just ask Tony Perkins.

John Dingell knew everything.

I know because he used to be my therapist.

#maytheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

JUDICIARY: Oversight of the Trump Administration’s Muslim Ban - Update On The Religious Freedom v. Parental Rights

Good identity management of other countries and risk was the underlying focus of responses from witnesses in reference to multiple attestation in other databases like INTERPOL.

Identity management is dealing with trafficking tiny humans, like "saving the children" through domestic and international adoptions.

The "ban" on entering the U.S. is about trafficking tiny humans, but no one wants to talk about that.

This has nothing to do about religion, unless you consider the application of christian chattel law when it comes to the right of entrance, right of exit when it comes to trafficking tiny humans in the name of the latest and greatest union of international beliefs when it comes to Religious Freedom in the battle to conserve those traditional family values of weaponizing religion to take over an elected government.


The Issue
Image result for Muslim Advocates
https://muslimadvocates.org/issue/religious-freedom/
Religious freedom is one of the bedrock principles upon which the United States was founded. Yet, American Muslims have increasingly faced bigotry, discrimination, and hostility to their very right to worship. Muslim Advocates works to protect American Muslims to build and maintain mosques and to worship free from discrimination.
Religious freedom is a shield to protect people from religious discrimination, not a sword to deny people their most basic rights.
Learn more about Muslim Advocates’ efforts to ensure that mosque permits are approved free from discrimination, that people in institutions can worship freely, and that the cause of religious freedom isn’t hijacked by those who seek to turn this basic principle on its head.
If you replace "Muslims" with "Christian" and "mosque" with "church" you have yourself a template a "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) for stealin' the children, land and votes.

One serious conflict of interest that has yet to be mentioned is the U.S. Commission on International Freedom was spearheaded by Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, who just so happens to be a really big fan of Mike Pence, and his election campaigns, and child welfare contracts.

On October 27, 2018, the International ReligiousFreedom Act (IRFA), which created the U.S.Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), reached its 20th anniversary. In the two decades since, a greater and more diverse number of actors across the globe are working to protect the fundamental freedom of thought, conscience, and religion as prescribed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In fact, the U.S. Department of State’s 2018 Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom became a fulcrum for change in these efforts—more foreign governments than ever before are taking action to uphold these rights in their own countries and around the world. p7
https://www.state.gov/international-religious-freedom-reports/

How come no one called State Department Sam Brownback, appropriator of the Foreign Faith Based Funding to participate?

With children come trust funds.

Trust funds have administrators.

Trust funds have benefactors.

Trust funds have trustees.

Administrators, benefactors and trustees can all be corporations.

Corporations are people, too, according to Mitt Romney.

Corporations have parental rights.

A corporate parent can acquire, transfer, procure and purvey tiny humans, where there is no way to trace the chain of command of the birth certificate to the allodial title, where the moveable chattel is tied to the land, but which land if the corporate parent is foreign?

If a child is under the legal guardianship of a foreign corporation, what is the citizenship of the child?

Children grow up to become adults where those identities can be used, over and over again, particularly when traveling for private "militia" purposes like interfering in U.S. elections and other stuff I have watered down into the tagline of "stealin' the children, land and votes.

No one wants to unravel that Gordian VISA Knot of human trafficking being lobbied advocated under the guise of propaganda, which has falsely advised Trump for the purposes of procuring faith based funding economic redevelopment contracts.

Witnesses

Panel One: 
Mr. Edward Ramotowski 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Visa Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State
Ms. Elizabeth Neumann 
Assistant Secretary for Threat Prevention and Security Policy, Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Mr. Todd Hoffman 
Executive Director, Admissions and Passenger Programs, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Panel Two: 
Mr. Abdollah Dehzangi 
Baltimore, MD
Mr. Ismail Ahmed Hezam Alghazali
Brooklyn, NY
Ms. Farhana Khera 
President and Executive Director, Muslim Advocates
The Honorable Andrew R. Arthur
Resident Fellow in Law and Policy, Center for Immigration Studies
116th Congress

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©