Showing posts with label EEOC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EEOC. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

DOJ: Attorney General William P. Barr Delivers Remarks at the Department of Justice's African-American History Month Observation - Forgets About Trump Executive Orders To End Slavery - My "Colored" Commentary

Hey Bill!

You forgot about Trump's Executive Orders to end slavery.

We can address this when you get to Detroit.


Thank you, Rod, for that very kind introduction.  Before I begin, I would like to thank Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein for his service.  Rod Rosenstein has spent his entire career at the Department of Justice.  He joined the Department through the Attorney General’s Honors Program in 1990 and has worked throughout the Department in the nearly thirty years since.  Over that time, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein has served the Department with dedication and distinction. We are thankful for his service.

I also want to thank Director Richard Toscano, Assistant Director Granette Trent, and the entire Justice Management Division’s Equal Employment Opportunity staff for putting on this important event every year.

Thank you to Theodore Roosevelt Senior High School’s Junior ROTC Color Guard for the Presentation of the Colors.

And thank you to Dorothy Williams of the Civil Rights Division for that beautiful rendition of our national anthem.

I also want to thank our closing speaker, Trial Attorney Oneshia Herring of the Civil Rights Division’s Housing and Civil Enforcement Section.

Thank you also for your service as Vice-Chair of Department of Justice Association of Black Attorneys.

But above all, thank you to our audience for being here to honor African-American history.

Black history is American history.  You cannot tell one story without telling the other.

This year’s theme is “Black Migrations,” which is an important topic in black history as well as in the history of the entire nation.

The first Black Migration to this country was forced migration.  It was the Middle Passage.

Over the course of centuries, millions of Africans were taken in chains, branded with hot irons, and put on small, overcrowded boats for a treacherous journey to this land.  That journey could take weeks or even months.

In these conditions, many died before they even reached the shore.  In a 1789 speech to Parliament, William Wilberforce cited an estimate that one in every eight slaves bound for Jamaica died on the Middle Passage, and that one third died soon after arrival.

Slavery was our nation’s original sin.  James Madison himself recognized as much in a letter he sent decades after he helped draft a Constitution codifying it.

Writing in 1820 to his old friend the Marquis de Lafayette, Madison described the political turmoil that had resulted from the inexcusable tolerance of slavery as “the dreadful fruitfulness of the original sin of the African trade.”

It took the bloodiest war in American history and three constitutional amendments to finally end slavery and to give African-Americans the freedom to migrate where they chose.

Once slavery was finally ended, those who had been enslaved and their descendants migrated again and spread to communities all across the country.

Hey Bill, precious....slavery was never abolished, nor has it ever ended.  You should read the Thirteenth Amendment. 

"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction".

Hey Bill, if slavery was finally ended, then how come Trump keeps putting out Executive Orders to end slavery?

Ooo, that is a bit disjointed.

For example, there were the Exodusters, the thousands of African-Americans who fled the South for the Great Plains states or for homesteads in the West.

But the best known of these migrations was, of course, the Great Migration, when millions African-Americans fled persecution in the South to places like Chicago, Detroit, or New York.

Hey Bill, what about the Great Migration of Detroit from the fake Emergency Manager, who did the fake Detroit Bankruptcy, who did the fake Automotive Industry Bailout, who did the fake Grand Bargain, who was behind the fake Detroit Land Bank Authority snatching homes through fake property tax and fake mortgage foreclosures?  When people are forced to migrate based upon a highly sophisticated property fraud scheme, that is called gerrymandering.

In her award-winning book The Warmth of Other Suns, Isabel Wilkerson writes, “during the First World War…a silent pilgrimage took its first steps…Over the course of six decades, some six million black southerners left the land of their forefathers and fanned out across the country for an uncertain existence…

Never heard of her but I know of a great case at the threshold of justice sitting in the Michigan Eastern District Court in Detroit waiting on you.

“By the time it was over, no northern or western city would be the same…In Chicago alone, the black population rocketed from [44,000] at the start of the Migration to more than one million at the end of it. By the turn of the 21stCentury, blacks made up a third of the city’s residents, with more blacks living in Chicago than in the entire state of Mississippi.”

The Great Migration changed American history not just for the migrants but for all of us. It made possible American cultural milestones like the Harlem Renaissance, Chicago blues, and Motown, just to name a few.

Hey Bill, the Great Migration also put on the books lots of arcane, anti-amalgamation laws and polices, from making lots of amalgamated babies, too.  Are you going to finally be the one to address child welfare fraud, or shall I just continue without you, considering that you will be busy, busy, busy?

The migrants included the families of Americans like Richard Wright, astronaut Mae Jemison, Housing and Urban Development Secretary and neurosurgeon Dr. Benjamin Carson, and many, many more.

Today we see many African-Americans returning to the South.  In the 2010 Census, a higher percentage of the African-American population lived in the South than in any Census in 50 years. I think that these are good signs that much progress has been made.

President Lincoln may have signed the emancipation proclamation more than 150 years ago, but there is a great deal of work left to do in eradicating prejudice and bringing together the people of this nation.

Much of that work falls to the Department of Justice.

Hey Bill, feel free to do that conjugal collaboration with multiple jurisdictions of law enforcement.

One of the reasons that this Department was created in the first place was to help protect the civil rights of African-Americans in the South and to fight the very same persecution that helped cause the Great Migration.

Hey Bill, #sayhisname.

That is why I pledged at my confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee that one of my top priorities as Attorney General would be protecting the right to vote.

Good boy!  You also pledged to Grassley to uphold his legacy in enforcing the False Claims Act.

In our present period of great political division, it is imperative that we protect every citizen’s right to vote from all persons, foreign or domestic, who seek to interfere with it.

So, when are you coming to Detroit?

I appreciate the more than 18,000 African-Americans who work at this Department—including many who serve as attorneys or as senior executives.

Hey Bill, how do you know that number is not higher?  Have you implemented mandatory one-drop DNA testing?

All of them are helping to write the next chapter in black history at the Department.

Hey Bill, how about helping preserve the annals of history, instead of color coding it.

And that is certainly true of our keynote speaker.

Louis Franklin has served at the Department for more than 26 years.  He started as an AUSA in the Middle District of Alabama, went into private practice, and then returned to become Criminal Chief for 16 years.

On June 15, 2017, he was nominated by President Trump to serve as United States Attorney.  On September 14, 2017, he was confirmed by the U.S. Senate.  Please join me in welcoming U.S. Attorney Louis Franklin.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, February 11, 2018

Congress Expands Treasury Powers To Enforce Due Process In Congressional Harassment & Discrimination

FinCEN
Financial Intelligence Division of the U.S. Treasury
It seems the U.S. Treasury will be handing congressional investigations regarding allegations of sexual harassment and discrimination.

In order to make someone pay something back, you must first have an investigation, evidentary findings, a trial, a judgment, and then, a lein, settlement, or perhaps referral to DOJ for criminal prosecutions.

That is called due process.

This policy directive may even cover prosecutions of all Members of Congress who have been found to have engaged in, oh, how shall I say this, the trafficking of tiny humans, in the forfeiture of assets.

The following is taken from the FinCEN Policy Directive, below.
Investigative Procedures: In accordance with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s Enforcement Guidance, there must be a prompt, thorough and impartial investigation conducted regarding the allegation of harassment. 
It also seems the U.S. Treasury has been animated to protect and serve the best interests of the child, the public way.



Just in case it has slipped anyone's mind, #perkinscoiesucks.

Are you ready?

I am.

Stay tuned.

House prohibits sexual relationships between lawmakers and their staffers

WASHINGTON – The House voted Tuesday to prohibit sexual relationships between lawmakers and their employees, a remarkable rule change that brings the institution in line with the military and the private sector after a rash of sexual harassment and misconduct allegations roiled Capitol Hill.

The prohibition, pushed by Rep. Barbara Comstock, R-Va., took immediate effect as Congress moved toward changing the system for reporting and adjudicating employees’ claims of sexual harassment.

The House approved language Tuesday establishing an office to advocate for employees during that process and a separate bill requiring lawmakers to reimburse taxpayers when they are involved in workplace settlements.

“Thanks to the #MeToo movement, the American public has made it clear that they have had enough,” said Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif. “They expect Congress to lead, and for once we are.”

The bipartisan bills are Congress’s most definitive response to the #MeToo campaign and the wave of harassment and misconduct scandals that have led to at least eight members resigning or announcing plans to retire in the past four months. Amid a national reckoning over sexual misbehavior in the workplace, news reports exposing lawmakers’ secretive process for settling harassment complaints with taxpayer dollars pushed House leaders to confront criticisms of the system.

“With this bill we are shining a blazing light on the scourge of workplace abuse, which has been allowed to fester in the shadows for too long,” said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
The bills cancel the requirement that accusers undergo counseling and mediation and loosen confidentiality rules governing the complaint process.

Comstock supported the legislation but noted its failure to require the disclosure of which members of Congress have reached settlements over harassment claims. “Part of that misuse of power is they can continue to know they won’t be held accountable, and the victims see that,” Comstock said.
The House approved both measures by voice vote under suspension of the rules, a method for fast-tracking noncontroversial bills.

H.R. 4924 alters the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to require members to reimburse the Treasury Department when they are involved in settlements; automatically refers cases that have settled to the House Ethics Committee; extends workplace protections to unpaid staffers, including interns; gives staffers the ability to file a lawsuit at the same time as they file a complaint; and improves record-keeping.

A separate resolution, House Resolution 724, requires each member of the House to adopt policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination; establishes the nonpartisan Office of Employee Advocacy to provide assistance to staffers with complaints; mandates that each member’s office certify it is not using its budget for workplace settlements; and prohibits sexual relationships between members and “any employee of the House that works under [their]supervision.”

Previously, House rules did not explicitly prohibit such relationships. The new rules bar lawmakers from engaging in “unwelcome sexual advances or conduct” toward colleagues and House employees but do not ban sexual relationships between lawmakers and staffers they do not supervise.

Little about the bills provoked controversy, with the exception of a provision to stop an independent ethics watchdog from investigating certain claims. The resolution placed the onus on the House Ethics Committee instead of the Office of Congressional Ethics, which tends to be more transparent about its findings, to look into allegations of workplace misconduct. This element of the legislation has drawn criticism from groups that argue the Ethics Committee has a poor track record of holding members accountable for improper behavior.

Since October, four members of Congress have resigned over allegations of sexual harassment or misconduct.

Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., who resigned his seat Jan. 2, was accused by eight women of inappropriate touching or forcible kissing, mostly before his election. Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Pa., resigned Oct. 5 after a news report said that he asked a woman with whom he had an extramarital affair to get an abortion.

Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., left his longtime seat Dec. 5 after six former employees accused him of unwanted sexual advances and other mistreatment. And Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., resigned Dec. 8 after reports that he offered a female staff member $5 million if she would bear his child.

Four other lawmakers have announced that they will not run for reelection amid similar scandals.
Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, said Nov. 30 that he would not seek another term after a lewd photo he sent to a woman with whom he was having an extramarital affair circulated online.

Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, said he would leave Congress amid allegations that he sexually harassed female staff members.

Rep. Ruben Kihuen, D-Nev., said Dec. 16 that he would not run for reelection after multiple women accused him of unwanted advances. Rep. Patrick Meehan, R-Pa., said Jan. 25 that he would not seek another term after reports that he settled with a former female staffer whom he later called his “soul mate.”


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©