Showing posts with label child protective services. Show all posts
Showing posts with label child protective services. Show all posts

Thursday, December 12, 2013

A CPS Documentary

This is a trailer shedding an introductory light on the inner workings of Child Protective Services which is funded through Social Security.  These are your tax dollars at work.

For more information on the daily activities of Child Protective Services go to LegallyKidnapped.com
 
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, September 28, 2012

Michigan To Be Sued For Child Racketeering

No matter how many times the state administrators of child welfare get called out in a court of law or in the media, they still get a paycheck.  These administrators should be placed on the central registry for covering up all the children in foster care who are raped, tortured, drugged to death, murdered, who have attempted and those who have successfully committed suicide.

Fire them all and dismantle Michigan Children's Institute.  There are no constitutional rights in the child welfare system, it's an organized racket.  Even SCOTUS is about to endoctrinate that foster children have no civil rights;.

Does Michigan registry violate constitutional rights?


(WXYZ) - It’s a list you probably never heard of, but once your name is on it, you can lose your job and reputation. It’s not easy to have your name removed from the list, and a Michigan attorney says the process that adds tens of thousands of new names to the list every year may be unconstitutional.

Not only has this Michigan attorney set forth a valid claim, she is backed up federal case law and my analytical brief.

Continuing along with the building of our constitutional challenge to Michigan's Central Registry, one can be amazed that there is a federal report supporting this Michigan attorney's claims.
National Child Abuse Registry Feasibility Report 2009

What will repulse you the most is the Director of the Michigan Central Registry, Collin Parks is that after the bloody battle one will engage when attempting to decide if he is lying through his teeth or as dumb as a bag of rocks, you will have to prepare to stomach the audacity of the state coming up with their affirmative defenses that the registry is constitutional.  

Please remember, I am An Original Source and I am going call this man on the carpet.

It’s called the Child Abuse and Neglect Central Registry, established and maintained by the State Department of Human Resources. Right now there are more than 350,000 names on the registry. 

Among them, however, are people who insist they have done nothing wrong to warrant their inclusion, and they say they have a great track record of caring for children.

Anyone can be on the Registry.  It is overseen by a group of arrogant imbeciles who were using the it as a, well let's just say a proactive immunity device to shield the state, inclusive of its private contracted agencies and counties, from lawsuits.

Take Debbie and Kevin Turner of Jackson. Years ago they adopted their two-and-a-half year old niece Miranda when it became clear the child’s parents could not care for the little girl. As Miranda grew, so did the evidence of mental illness and defect which included bizarre violent behavior and attacks on animals and adults in the house and at treatment facilities the child was taken to.  

“She’s my niece,” a tearful Debbie told 7 Action News. “ I still care for her.”

But, in the same breath, Debbie admits it hasn’t been easy. “She started hurting dogs. She liked fire. She was cutting Barbie dolls heads off.” Then Debbie added, as Miranda became a teenager, things got worse.  “We called the police at times because Miranda was violent. She always threatened she was going to kill me with a knife. She said I’m going to kill you and burn the house down.”

“That’s when I finally put my foot down and said I wasn’t going to be threatened anymore,” said Kevin Turner. “The fear factor was enough. The stress, the anxiety. Everything.”

Two years ago the Turners made the difficult decision to give Miranda up to the state for treatment and care. That decision got them placed on the central registry.

Let's examine plausible reasons why the decision to put these caregivers on the central registry.  First, you are placed on the registry in less than 24 hours after there is intervention of Child Protective Services.  This is how the billing of Medicaid begins, or should I say the Medicaid fraud in child welfare.

CPS will bring ex-parte action in the court without every letting you know you have a case.  The judge,   or a clerk of the court, or anyone with the rubber stamp of the judge, will automatically, 100% of the time, approve the request and grant authority for CPS to do whatever the worker wishes to do.  This is the first placement order of the judge.  This ex-parte order is so crucial because it determines the funding streams, rather, who is going to pay for the child.  

Here is an actual training presentation from the Michigan Child Welfare Training Institute:
Michigan Title IV E Funding Presentation 5-2008


There is no attorney involved.  The state attorney general, if it is Wayne County, or the counties prosecutor will step in after CPS has creatively generated, opps, I mean filed its investigative findings withthe court.  Whatever entity is legally representing the state, trust and believe they have only looked at the 'creatively generated' court report for the first time when they show up for court that day.  

In Battle Creek, Helen Miller and her husband have been fighting to get their names removed from the registry. “They took every foster kid I had. I had four at the time.” That painful memory is part of a scenario that still puzzles Helen- how a mistake, and a family situation unknown to her and her husband has dominated their lives.

“After 26 years of doing foster care, you’d think you’d want to keep some people around that have changed kids' lives,” Dan says. Helen and Dan Miller run a 90 acre horse farm and training facility outside Battle Creek where they have spent much of the past 26 years helping more than 100 children grow into productive adults. But just one mistake, allowing two teenaged foster children to stay the night with her daughter, got them placed on the central registry.

”She was seeing her ex-husband again,” Helen said of her daughter. There were drugs in the house that she says the ex-husband was dealing on the side while working a blue collar job doing repairs. “We didn’t know about it,” she said. The kids were there when police conducted a drug raid. A DHS investigation followed, and two days later, four children were briefly removed from the Millers home. A judge heard the facts, gave the children back to the couple, but their names remain on the registry, which keeps Helen from doing the job she loves so much.

“I can’t foster, I can’t get a job anywhere, and background check, I can’t get a job,” she says.

Debbie Turner also lost the job she had for 17 years after the state put her on the registry. She worked at a head-start program as a secretary. Once on the registry, you can’t have contact with kids, though Turner says she never had contract with children at her job. “What we did wrong was take a child, and love her and try to make her as our own, with our other children, and it blew up in our face,” she says.

“Across the country there is abundant data that says that these registries are unreliable,” says attorney Elizabeth Warner. “So, it’s of no use to anybody to protect children.” Warner represents Debbie and Helen in an effort to get them off the registry, which she says is very hard to do. According to the state, more than 350,000 people are on the registry, which is intended to protect children from people determined to be abusive or neglectful. Warner says the registry violates people’s constitutional rights because they are not given their day in court to fight the abuse and neglect allegations before a child protective service worker puts them on the registry.

Lest not forget this classic audit from the Michigan Auditor General on the corruption of the system and incompetence of administration of the central registry.
Michigan Audit of Department of Human Services 2004

Warner says “actually, in our constitutional system, they can’t cut off your electricity or welfare benefits without giving you a fair hearing first. But in Michigan, they can put you on the black list of child abusers, and they don’t have to give year a hearing, and that’s written in the law.”

Not until you are put on the registry can you request a hearing to get off the list.

“I’m guilty before I’m proven innocent and I didn’t do anything,” Debbie says.

But, Colin Parks who heads Child Protective Services, which is part of the Department of Human Services, defends how the registry works.

I have not been keeping up with the musical chairs of administration over at DHS but I do remember a piece fecal matter by the name of Steve Yager.  

Steve Yager was a final decision maker on who would get off the central registry.  Here is a quote from one of his decisions of why he would not remove a person from the registry:

"You are denied your request to be removed from the central registry because you were placed on the central registry."

When there is a hearing to remove a name from the central registry, it is recorded.  Here is an actual quote from an administrative law judge in such hearing"

"There are no constitutionalities in this proceeding."

He says everyone is thoroughly investigated before their name is added to it. “It is evidence based,” Parks says. “It’s not a subjective decision. The worker doesn’t arbitrarily make a decision to put somebody on the registry.”

Sometimes the decisions are not just arbitrary, they are also capricious.  It's Michigan's philosophy under the Cotton Doctrine.  Upon exiting the child welfare system through a consent decision of the Michigan Children's Institute Superintendent Bill Johnson, the Cotton Doctrine is used to defend the placement decisions of the state.  One must prove the Superintendent did not whimsically make a decision, albeit the decision was wrong.

Upon entry of the child welfare system, (the central registry) one must prove the decision, albeit wrong, was done whimsically.  The Cotton Doctrine is what Collin Parks is spouting.

As God is my witness, depose me.  Call me to the stand under oath and I will give you copiously preserved state records that will emphatically prove that Collin Parks is utterly incompetent to be in his position and that the state is covering up Medicaid fraud in child welfare.

Asked if the state should first hold a hearing before adding a name to the list, Parks said no, because there isn’t time or resources to do it with more than 80,000 new child abuse and neglect cases under investigation every year. “Out of all of those cases, the expectation that somebody would be able to review those decisions would be a very time consuming task,” he said. “I’m concerned that based on that volume if it would be possible.”

At this time I am asking everyone who reads this to formally request a background on your name to find out if you are on the central registry.  Even though you may never had children or never been around children, do anyway just to see the system implode to demonstrate that the central registry is the cover up for Michigan's child welfare fraud schemes right as the federal case is being filed.  Besides, how would you know if you were never notified?

Attorney Warner plans to sue the state over the central registry in federal court early next month. She wants Michigan to do what other states with registries have done: hold a hearing before a person is added to the list.

There is no such thing as due process in child welfare.  

Get them.  Call me when you need me.  I got more.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, May 14, 2012

Rep. Hansen Clarke Asks Attorney General To Investigate Michigan Child Protective Services

U.S. Representative Hansen Clarke's Letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder requesting investigation of Michigan Department of Human Services Child Protective Services.U.S. Representative Hansen Clarke's Letter to Attorney General Eric Holder TO Investigate Michigan CPS 5-9-12 Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

New Tools to Fight Fraud Child Welfare Programs

Once again, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in partnership with the U.S. Department of Justice plum forgot to address the multi-billion dollar industry of child welfare fraud.

Why, you ask?

Because there are not enough Inspectors General and Attorneys General reading my posts.

Monday, December 5, 2011

Psych Med Special - Baby LK Report For December 4th 2011

Baby LK recaps the week in news for the child protective industry.



Thursday, November 24, 2011

A Special Thanksgiving Message from Baby LK


Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Federal judge should hear Arlington CPS case

One of the most disturbing stories I've ever written for The Washington Examiner was about a 3-week-old baby girl who was snatched from her mother's arms and placed in foster care by Arlington County Child Protective Services because she lost 10 ounces after birth. Baby Sabrina's story hit me hard in the gut because that could have been me; my youngest daughter lost a whole pound postpartum.
Newborn weight loss is normal, Sabrina was under a doctor's care and had even regained all of her lost birth weight when she was taken. Kit Slitor, a freelance video editor, and his wife, Nancy Hey, a federal employee, were never charged with or convicted of child abuse or neglect, and the Virginia Department of Social Services exonerated them of any wrongdoing. It didn't matter.
After doing everything social workers and the Arlington Domestic and Juvenile Relations Court, or DJR, demanded of them -- including home inspections, supervised visitation, and psychological testing -- their parental rights were terminated and Sabrina was put up for adoption. They spent more than $250,000 fighting for her, all the way to the Virginia Supreme Court, which declined to hear their case.
Four years later, their story still haunts me.
On Sept. 16, a class-action lawsuit modeled after a similar pleading in Massachusetts was filed in federal court in Alexandria on behalf of eight children -- including Sabrina -- who have been placed in foster care by Arlington County.
The list of serious accusations contained in the lawsuit against DJR Judges George Varoutsos and Esther Wiggins, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney Jason McCandless, and various Arlington CPS officials is long: perjury, RICO violations of civil rights, fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, unconstitutional "ex parte" hearings, court orders that were never served, depriving parents of their due process rights, "missing" court orders, illegal searches and seizures, and felony removal of documents from court files, to name just a few.
Arlington CPS "has not implemented the reforms necessary to remedy the severe and persistent legal violations within its foster care system, despite its longstanding knowledge of these systemic ills," the lawsuit alleges. The allegations are so grave that if the judicial system were working properly, an emergency restraining order against DJR would be issued immediately.
Don't hold your breath. The "next friend" lawsuit was filed by nonlawyer James Renwick Manship, a disabled Navy cryptologist and court-appointed special advocate, on behalf of foster children and their impoverished parents. It's the longest of long shots aimed directly at a corrupt, unaccountable system that holds every card in the deck.
Or almost every card. Judge James Cacheris caused quite a legal stir in May when he cited the landmark Supreme Court Citizens United ruling to strike down a ban on corporate political donations. Campaign finance is an important issue, but it pales in comparison with judicial kidnapping, which strikes at the very heart of Americans' God-given rights.
If social workers and judges can take your child away without due process, the Constitution is nothing more than a piece of paper the powerful can continue to ignore with impunity.
There's still a chance that Cacheris, who was appointed to the federal bench by President Reagan, will search his conscience, rise to the occasion, and allow this David vs. Goliath case to proceed to trial despite tremendous pressure from the legal establishment to ignore the compelling evidence of official misconduct and continue covering up this rot.
Stay tuned.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Arizona Adopts Michigan Child Medicaid Revenue Maximizing Fraud Schemes



Here is a terse op-ed by Barbara A. O'Brien commenting on Arizona's Child Protective Services Governor Task Force.

From what I have gathered, Arizona has done absolutely nothing in the areas of Continuous Quality Improvement for almost 6 years.

Couple that with the fact that the state is expending billions to snatch children of undocumented immigrants to shove them in foster care instead of promoting family, you have just found the underlying reason why Arizona has created a CPS task force.

So what other reasons exist for Arizona to revamp its Child Protective Services at this particular time?  I found the reason here, as stated by Cindy Mann:



Cindy Mann, is the Deputy Administrator Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services Director Center for Medicaid, CHIP, and Survey and Certification.

To better understand the motivation of Arizona to establish barriers for its citizens to this federal program, one may look no further than of the Michigan's working model, designed by Maura Corrigan.


CPS task force needs real experts


Gov. Jan Brewer labels the task force she appointed to improve Child Protective Services as comprised of "the best child-safety experts in Arizona."

However, I don't believe there is one member who has psychology, counseling or child- and family-development credentials and experience.

Given the severe lack of effectiveness of CPS over the years, why does anyone believe that yet another gathering of the same "experts" (legislators, police and other assorted businesspeople and child-welfare agency administrators) will be able to produce miraculous reform?

Why doesn't the task force include a licensed child psychologist, counselor, family therapist, or social worker who works with children and families?

Someone who not only understands abuse, neglect, mental illness and substance abuse, but who works directly with these phenomena.

Someone skilled in conducting interviews in a way that gleans honest answers and instills motivation to seek help. Our children deserve better!

-- Barbara A. O'Brien, Phoenix


I responded in my traditional fashion.

In order to improve the functioning and image of Child Protective Services experts must represent all facets of the industry, not solely under the lens of the objective of removal of children based upon the codification of poverty being the crime of abuse and neglect. A key area when approaching the improvement in delivery and quality of services is in the administrative structures of transparency and accountability. 


Arizona has not demonstrated a very credible track record when it comes to properly administrating its child welfare services, documented in this federal report of more than $21 million in false claims. 



If Arizona has a pervasive issue with drug usage within its communities which deems removal of children, it would behoove society as a whole to identify and deliver remedy to ameliorate it. This is called, from a basic economic perspective as investment in human capital, or rather investment in the best interests of the children so they may mature for society to reap the profits of a productive, tax paying citizen. 

As it stands, the use of perjorative statements such as "bottom of the dung heap" presents, not only a lack of substance in your argument, but reduces it to an ad homenin fallacy. 

Simply put, you have been reduced to throwing sticks and stones as you have no logical retort to this op-ed. 

GOPinNOV, if your daughter, who is a representative, contractual arm of the State of Arizona, feels that its citizens and the clients of her employer are "bottom of the dung heap", then it would behoove her to find a new profession for the greater good of the State. In posting this response, you have exposed the bias when it comes to case recommendations for referral of services and reunification, which should be construed as a hate crime, calling for intervention of the State Attorney General to investigate possible civil rights and false claims violations. 

State Attorney General Tom Horne must also be included in this task force as it is the duty of his Office to investigate Medicaid fraud, waste and abuse in child welfare. At this time, I shall commend Governor Brewer for the creation of this task force and graciously offer my expertise to provide the omitted voice in the area of administration oversight and federal compliance. 

Beverly Tran 



In the end, these Child Protective Services Task Forces will only be hand picked by those individuals who are willing to coddle the whims of those who want to rebuild their economy of the backs of the poor and their children, the oldest form of survival.