Showing posts with label BOP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BOP. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown: Trump Said Yes But Barr Said No To Kwame

But, Trump told Karen Whitsett that Kwame was going to be released.

State Rep. Karen Whitsett said Pres. Trump told her Kwame Kilpatrick would soon be released

I believe we have ourselves a Trump v. Barr show about to commence.

Boo Boo Barr has been very naughty, you know.

It seems no one want Kwame to tell his tale.

I wonder if Sherry "The Sleuth" Gay Dagnogo will weigh in, again.

I still have popcorn.

Kwame Kilpatrick early release denied by Federal Bureau of Prisons


FOX 2 - The Federal Bureau of Prisons has denied the early release of former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick.

In a release, the Federal Bureau of Prisons announced Tuesday that it reviewed and denied Kilpatrick, 49, for home confinement.

"Mr Kilpatrick remains incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution-I in Oakdale, Louisiana," the release states.

According to a state representative and advocacy group The Ebony Foundation, Kilpatrick was in line for a compassionate release due to the coronavirus in the prison system.

US Attorney General William Barr previously had announced about 3,000 federal inmates were to be released early due to concerns of COVID-19 spreading in the jails.

The Oakdale Federal Prison near New Orleans has hadabout 42 cases of the coronavirus and two deaths as of last week.

Kilpatrick has served seven years of his 28-year sentence for corruption and raketeering in office. He served as mayor of Detroit from 2001 to 2008. He was sentenced in 2013 and has since lost his appeals.

State Rep. Karen Whitsett said Friday she had spoken to President Donald Trump in Ypsilanti Thursday night and was told by him that Kilpatrick would be released.

Stay with FOX 2 for more on this developing story.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, October 25, 2019

JUDICIARY: CHAIRMAN NADLER STATEMENT AT OVERSIGHT HEARING ON THE BUREAU OF PRISONS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST STEP ACT - October 17, 2019




Washington, D.C. – Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) delivered the following opening remarks during a Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security hearing on oversight of the Bureau of Prisons and implementation of the First Step Act:

“I thank our Crime Subcommittee Chair, the Gentlelady from California, Ms. Bass, for holding this hearing today to carry out our oversight responsibilities over the Bureau of Prisons and implementation of the First Step Act.

“Passage of the First Step Act, thanks to the leadership of Ranking Member Collins, along with the Gentleman from New York, Mr. Jeffries, and many others, was an important bipartisan achievement.  It has been almost one year since the First Step Act was enacted and, while there have been some positive developments, many questions remain about its implementation.

“We must ensure that any changes we put in place in the Bureau of Prisons, as a result of the First Step Act, are carried through in a transparent fashion and in a way that alleviates—not exacerbates—the disparities that already exist in the criminal justice system.  I am concerned that the risk assessment tool established by the Department of Justice pursuant to the First Step Act fails this test.  I, therefore, look forward to today’s hearing and a full discussion of these issues.

“I am especially glad that Dr. Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director of the Bureau of Prisons, is here because I remain concerned about an incident that took place earlier this year at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn—in my district.  In late January and early February 2019, a severe cold wave caused by a weakened jet stream around the Arctic polar vortex hit Canada and the northeastern United States.  The temperature in New York, on January 31st, reached 2 degrees Fahrenheit, with a windchill of negative 17 degrees.

“On the coldest week of the year, there was a fire at MDC and something went very wrong.  Inmates—many of whom only had short-sleeved shirts to wear—had no heat, they had no electricity, and they had no way to contact their loved ones.  Inmates who needed medication, had none.  Inmates who needed CPAP machines to sleep safely could not use them because there was no power.  Everyone was freezing—and many were terrified.

“Along with Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez, I went to MDC in the middle of all this.  I could not believe what I saw.  Not only was there no plan in place to assure inmate safety in case of a power outage, there appeared to be no sense of urgency to address this life threatening problem.

“Congresswoman Velazquez and I insisted that the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice investigate.  Last month, OIG issued a report, which contains alarming findings that are consistent with what we had heard and seen.

“According to the report, there have been long-standing temperature regulation issues at MDC, which have gone unaddressed.  This is unacceptable.  Moreover, BOP leadership and staff failed to manage effectively critical aspects of the jail operation during the emergency.  This, too, is unacceptable.  BOP must do better.

“I am also concerned that BOP has been plagued by staffing shortages for years.  To make up for these shortages, staff are often called upon to work overtime, and often many times in the same week.  BOP also relies on a practice called ‘augmentation’ through which staff who are not correctional officers—including secretaries, teachers, nurses, and cooks—perform the duties of corrections officers, including supervising inmates in housing units and elsewhere.

“These staff are ill-equipped to replace experienced correctional officers who know the inmates and the responsibilities of their assigned posts.  Augmentation also reduces access to programming, recreation, and education initiatives, which are key to maintaining safe facilities and reducing recidivism—one of the major goals of the First Step Act.

“From press accounts and from what we have been told by corrections union representatives, it appears that these staffing issues may have contributed to the failure of BOP to adequately supervise Jeffrey Epstein, who should have been under greater and more skilled supervision before he killed himself this summer.

“These are just some of the important issues that we must examine today.  I look forward to hearing from our two panels of distinguished witnesses, and I yield back the balance of my time.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, August 13, 2019

DOJ: Attorney General William P. Barr Delivers Remarks at the Grand Lodge Fraternal Order of Police's 64th National Biennial Conference - " Epstein's co-conspirators should not rest easy"




New OrleansLA
 ~
Monday, August 12, 2019
Remarks as prepared for delivery
Good morning!  Thank you, Chuck [Canterbury], for your kind introduction.  Jim [Pasco], it’s great to see you and thanks for all that you have done for the FOP over the years. 
Congressman Scalise, it is good to see you this morning.  Thank you for your support for law enforcement.  We will never forget the heroism of the Capitol Police Officers that day and how their swift action prevented a mass tragedy.
Before I begin, I would like to briefly address the news from the Manhattan Correctional Center over the weekend regarding Jeffrey Epstein.  This case was very important to the Department.  It was important to the dedicated prosecutors and agents who investigated the case and were preparing it for trial.  Most importantly, this case was important to the victims who had the courage to come forward and deserved the opportunity to confront the accused in court.
I was appalled – indeed, the entire Department was – and frankly angry, to learn of the MCC’s failure to adequately secure this prisoner.  We are now learning of serious irregularities at this facility that are deeply concerning and that demand a thorough investigation.  The FBI and the Office of Inspector General are already doing just that.  We will get to the bottom of what happened at the MCC and we will hold people accountable for this failure.
Let me assure you that this case will continue on against anyone who was complicit with Epstein.  Any co-conspirators should not rest easy.  The victims deserve justice, and we will ensure they get it.
And now, let me turn to the reason I am here, to renew a relationship with old friends.  
It is a real privilege for me to join the Fraternal Order of Police this morning.  I enjoyed a close relationship with the FOP my first time around in this job, and I am looking forward to an even closer one this time.
Let me say I am proud to serve in an Administration and under President Trump who so strongly support law enforcement.
To my mind, there is no more noble profession than serving as a police officer. You put your own life and well-being on the line to protect your communities.
Your families spend anxious nights, so we can sleep in peace.  You never know what your day may bring — what uncertainty, danger, or threat you might face.  But you still get up, put on your uniform and badge, kiss your loved ones, and head out to face whatever risks might come your way. 
This calls for a special kind of bravery.  I remember that when our troops went off to war in the First Gulf War, they were cheered along the highways as they went. And when they returned in victory, they were cheered and given ticker tape parades – and rightly so.
But when police officers leave their precincts every morning, there are no crowds on the highway cheering you.  And when you come home at the end of the day after a job well done, there are no ticker tape parades.
One reason for this is that law enforcement is fighting a different type of war.  We are fighting an unrelenting, never-ending fight against criminal predators in our society.  While there are battles won and lost each day, there is never a final resolution – a final victory is never in sight.
It takes a very special kind of courage to wage this kind of fight – a special kind of commitment; a special kind of self-sacrifice.
So it is an honor for me to have been invited here, to be among you, and to have the opportunity, as Attorney General, to support you and salute you.
The horrors of El Paso and Dayton last week still weigh heavily on all of us.  We still mourn the victims of these evil acts.  We are also proud of the police who responded to the scenes and prevented further bloodshed.
It is particularly stirring to watch the footage from Dayton.  As the shooting started and civilians fled, you can see the police charging headlong towards the shooter, whom they quickly and skillfully neutralized.  Every American should thank God that we still have men and women like them – like you – who stand ready to run toward the mortal danger.
Let me assure you that the President will not let acts of mass shootings and domestic terrorism go unanswered.  He has been consulting widely and has directed me and Director Wray to work with our state and local partners, as well as the private sector, to develop strategies and measures to address these threats, including developing tools that can assist us in detecting potential mass shooters before they strike.  I anticipate that we will be sharing range of proposals – legislative as well as operational – in the near future.  I can assure you that our proposals will involve collaboration, with you – our colleagues at the state and local levels.
The recent atrocities also remind us of a basic truth.  Human beings are capable of great good, but also of the basest evil.  Even in a healthy society, violence, lawlessness, and predation lie just below the surface.  In the final analysis, what stands between chaos and carnage on the one hand, and the civilized and tranquil society we all yearn for, is the thin blue line of law enforcement.  You are the ones manning the ramparts – day in, and day out.
Even in the best of times, there is no tougher calling than serving as a police officer.  Today, it is much tougher than it has ever been.
The Framers believed that a free society can only exist if the people have the personal virtue and self-restraint to control their own worst passions and appetites.
If people lose the values and moral discipline to control themselves, then government would increasingly have to use external force to keep order, and the community would gradually lose its freedom.  This is what James Madison was talking about when he said, “We have staked our future on the ability of each of us to govern ourselves.”
We live in an age now when the institutions we have relied on to inculcate values and self-restraint have been under constant assault for over 50 years.  As a result, we see about us increased social pathology:  boys growing up without fathers; alienated and angry young men; gangs engaged in the most brutal violence; mass shootings; increasing mental illness and suicide among young people; a drug epidemic inflicting casualties beyond what we would sustain in a major war; growing domestic violence; an increase in sexual assaults and child exploitation.
You name it.  And who is expected to deal with this?  As other institutions fail and abdicate, who is expected to stand their ground?  Who is expected to pick up the pieces?  You are.  The police.  The thin blue line.
That is why I say that the job you are asked to do has never been more challenging.  The risks you are called on to take have never been greater.
Despite the fact that the majority of the American people do support the police, unfortunately, over the past few years, there has been an increasingly vocal minority that regularly attacks the police and advances a narrative that it is the police that are the bad guys rather than the criminals.  Whenever there is a confrontation involving the use of force by police, they automatically start screaming for the officers’ scalps, regardless of the facts.
I am not suggesting there are never abuses.  As with all human institutions there are sometimes bad apples; and we will deal with that.  But these are very much the exceptions, not the rule.  If anything, I continue to be amazed at the professionalism of our police officers in the most extreme circumstances.
The anti-police narrative is fanning disrespect for the law.  In recent years, we have witnessed increasing toleration of the notion that it is somehow okay to resist the police.  
Previously, it was well understood that, regardless of the circumstances, physical resistance is unacceptable because it necessarily leads to a spiral of escalating violence that endangers the safety of the officer, the suspect, and all in the vicinity.  For that reason, virtually all jurisdictions have made resistance a serious crime.
Not too long ago influential public voices — whether in the media or among community and civic leaders — stressed the need to comply with police commands, even if one thinks they are unjust.  “Comply first” and, if you think you have been wronged, “complain later.”
But we don’t hear this much anymore.  Instead, when an incident escalates due to a suspect’s violent resistance to police, that fact is usually ignored by the commentary.  The officer’s every action is dissected, but the suspect’s resistance, and the danger it posed, frequently goes without mention.
We need to get back to basics.  We need public voices, in the media and elsewhere, to underscore the need to “Comply first, and, if warranted, complain later.”  This will make everyone safe – the police, suspects, and the community at large.  And those who resist must be prosecuted for that crime.  We must have zero tolerance for resisting police.  This will save lives.
We are seeing disrespect for law enforcement in other ways.  We were all nauseated by the spectacle of prancing punks pelting New York police officers with water and plastic buckets.  Unfortunately, these were not isolated events.  From 2014 through 2017, there has been a 20 percent increase in assaults against police, up to about 60,000 per year.
This Administration will not tolerate violence against police, and we will do all we can to protect the safety of law enforcement officers.  I will share with you one proposal that we will be advancing after Labor Day.  We will be proposing legislation providing that in cases of mass murder, or in cases of murder of a law enforcement officer, there will be a timetable for judicial proceedings that will allow imposition of any death sentence without undue delay.  Punishment must be swift and certain.
There is another development that is demoralizing to law enforcement and dangerous to public safety.  That is the emergence in some of our large cities of District Attorneys that style themselves as “social justice” reformers, who spend their time undercutting the police, letting criminals off the hook, and refusing to enforce the law.
These anti-law enforcement DAs have tended to emerge in jurisdictions where the election is largely determined by the primary.  Frequently, these candidates ambush an incumbent DA in the primary with misleading campaigns and large infusions of money from outside groups.
Once in office, they have been announcing their refusal to enforce broad swathes of the criminal law.  Most disturbing is that some are refusing to prosecute cases of resisting police.  Some are refusing to prosecute various theft cases or drug cases, even where the suspect is involved in distribution.  And when they do deign to charge a criminal suspect, they are frequently seeking sentences that are pathetically lenient.  So these cities are headed back to the days of revolving door justice.  The results will be predictable. More crime; more victims.
One of my messages today is that the American people need to pay close attention to issues of public safety in their communities.  As a society we should not take our police officers for granted.
I would like to see the American people gain a renewed appreciation of the noble work done by our police officers in protecting our communities.  I would like to see increased recognition that being a police officer is the toughest job in the country, and it is getting tougher.  I would like to see a greater commitment to supporting the police.
The “thin blue line” is getting thinner.  The number of sworn officers per capita has been dropping.  We are now in a full employment economy.  With lucrative and safer jobs now available in other sectors, police departments must compete hard to attract the best candidates.
Many cities are already unable to fill their ranks, and vacancy rates are mounting. The harder we make the police officer’s job – the less they are supported – the harder it will be to attract qualified candidates.  And I think we can anticipate that those who come forward to serve will be increasingly attracted to jurisdictions where the community supports the police.
It is imperative that state and local jurisdictions not scrimp on investing in law enforcement.  At time when governments are trying to be all things to all people, it is important not to forget the basics.  The very reason we have government is to protect the public safety.  The very first duty of government is to provide the police.  If we are to maintain the professional police forces we currently have, we must ensure ample budgets to fund good compensation, full force levels, sufficient equipment and adequate training.
I would like to turn for a moment to my priorities and the importance of our partnership.
Two of my highest priorities are continuing the fight against violent crime and combating the opioid epidemic and the scourge of other dangerous drugs, like resurging methamphetimine.
When I last served as Attorney General in the early 90’s, violent crime was at all-time high levels in the country.  Starting in the 1960’s, we had gone through three decades of “reform” that turned our criminal justice system into a laughable revolving door.  Incarceration rates dropped precipitously; and crime rates tripled, reaching a high in 1991-92.
Starting with the Reagan Administration, and running though the Bush, Clinton, and Bush years, we strengthened our criminal justice systems at both the Federal and state level.  We focused on getting chronic violent offenders off the streets and into prisons to serve meaningful sentences that protected the community.  We worked closely with our State and local partners on programs like Weed & Seed and Triggerlock.
The result?  A steady and sharp drop in violent crime starting in 1992.  Today, violent crime has been cut in half. 
Unfortunately, in the last few years of the Obama Administration, the violent crime rate started rising again.  Days after his inauguration, President Trump issued an Executive Order with two clear directives.  First, he declared that this Administration would reduce crime in America.  Second, he directed the Department of Justice to take the lead on Federal actions to support law enforcement efforts nationwide and to collaborate with State, tribal, and local jurisdictions to restore public safety to all of our communities.
We take this responsibility seriously and, working closely with our State and local partners, we have succeeded once again in driving crime rates back down.  I am proud of our work together on Project Safe Neighborhood, and a variety of joint anti-gang and anti-gun crime efforts.
We have made a difference, but we cannot rest on our laurels.  Crime levels are still too high and we must keep up a full court press.  In the weeks ahead, we will be doubling down on our attack on violent crime.  We will be expanding our efforts against gun violence and violent gangs.  Once again, we plan on doing this shoulder-to-shoulder with our State and local partners.
On the drug front, we are facing a monumental challenge.  To be frank, the Obama Administration showed little interest in prosecuting the fight against dangerous drugs.  A tsunami built up and has been crashing over the country, bringing death and destruction.
The death toll from opioids alone is higher than we would sustain in a major war.  Indeed, in a single year, we lose more people to opioids than we lost during the entire Vietnam War.
Fortunately, this Administration has thrown down the gauntlet.  It declared a national emergency, marshalled the Nation’s resources, and is fighting back.
We have a robust program to attack the problem of over-prescription and diversion of legal opioids, and we are definitely having an impact.  Prescription rates are markedly down.  I am confident these successes will accelerate.
I think our attack on illicit opioids is building momentum.  It is going to be a long difficult road, but we are gaining real traction.
As you know, this Administration has sharply increased drug trafficking prosecutions, especially as to opioids.  In 2018 we prosecuted 36 percent more opioid-related offenses than we did in the previous year.  Fentanyl prosecutions were up 200 percent.
Fentanyl and other synthetics are especially deadly.  Unless we make progress on fentanyl, the gains we are making elsewhere can be overwhelmed.  A year ago, the Department launched Operation SOS, targeting synthetics in 10 high-impact districts.  The first year’s results are promising, and I plan to ratchet up this initiative.
Obviously, the head of the snake is outside the United States.  Most of the illegal drugs coming into the country – opioids, cocaine, and meth – are trafficked from Mexico by transnational organized crime, particularly the Mexican cartels.
We must destroy these cartels.  This is a uniquely Federal responsibility.  We have destroyed cartels in the past, but we let up so that other groups were able to take their place.  We cannot do that again.  I don’t underestimate how hard this work is, and how long it will take.
The successful prosecution of El Chapo was a big step forward.  We have to capitalize on that.  I have asked our agencies to use every tool at our Nation’s disposal to step up the attack on the cartels.  I am hoping that President Trump’s breakthrough agreement with Mexico on cooperating on the immigration crisis will give us an opportunity to work more closely in attacking the cartels.
In closing, I want to thank you again for all that you do.  Thank you for keeping us safe where we live and work.  Ever since the settlers in Boston established the night watch in 1635, America has had a proud tradition of professionals who stand guard against those who would do us harm.  You are the latest in that noble line.
Please continue to do what you do.  This Administration has your back.  May God bless you and keep you safe.  And may God bless the United States of America.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, August 11, 2019

DOJ: Statements Of SDNY & Attorney General On The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein - Hugh Hurwitz Is On It!




First, this was published.
Geoffrey S. Berman.jpg
Geoffrey Berman

Statement Of Manhattan U.S. Attorney On The Death Of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “Earlier this morning, the Manhattan Correctional Center confirmed that Jeffrey Epstein, who faced charges brought by this Office of engaging in the sex trafficking of minors, had been found unresponsive in his cell and was pronounced dead shortly thereafter of an apparent suicide.  Today’s events are disturbing, and we are deeply aware of their potential to present yet another hurdle to giving Epstein’s many victims their day in Court. To those brave young women who have already come forward and to the many others who have yet to do so, let me reiterate that we remain committed to standing for you, and our investigation of the conduct charged in the Indictment – which included a conspiracy count – remains ongoing.
We continue to urge anyone who feels they may be a victim or have information related to the conduct in this case to please contact 1-800- CALL FBI.”

Then, this was published.

Statement from Attorney General William P. Barr on the Death of Jeffrey Epstein

Attorney General William P. Barr issued the following statement:
“I was appalled to learn that Jeffrey Epstein was found dead early this morning from an apparent suicide while in federal custody. Mr. Epstein’s death raises serious questions that must be answered. In addition to the FBI’s investigation, I have consulted with the Inspector General who is opening an investigation into the circumstances of Mr. Epstein’s death."
Then, I realized that Hugh Hurwitz is probably the one who is one investigating the matter.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, July 25, 2019

DOJ: Federal Government to Resume Capital Punishment After Nearly Two Decade Lapse - Crimes Against Wellbeing Of Children

We begin the descent.

It gets much darker because they do it in the name of the Lord.

Attorney General William P. Barr Directs the Federal Bureau of Prisons to Adopt an Addendum to the Federal Execution Protocol and Schedule the Executions of Five Death-Row Inmates Convicted of Murdering Children

Attorney General William P. Barr has directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to adopt a proposed Addendum to the Federal Execution Protocol—clearing the way for the federal government to resume capital punishment after a nearly two decade lapse, and bringing justice to victims of the most horrific crimes.  The Attorney General has further directed the Acting Director of the BOP, Hugh Hurwitz, to schedule the executions of five death-row inmates convicted of murdering, and in some cases torturing and raping, the most vulnerable in our society—children and the elderly.
“Congress has expressly authorized the death penalty through legislation adopted by the people’s representatives in both houses of Congress and signed by the President,” Attorney General Barr said.  “Under Administrations of both parties, the Department of Justice has sought the death penalty against the worst criminals, including these five murderers, each of whom was convicted by a jury of his peers after a full and fair proceeding.  The Justice Department upholds the rule of law—and we owe it to the victims and their families to carry forward the sentence imposed by our justice system.”
The Federal Execution Protocol Addendum, which closely mirrors protocols utilized by several states, including currently Georgia, Missouri, and Texas, replaces the three-drug procedure previously used in federal executions with a single drug—pentobarbital.  Since 2010, 14 states have used pentobarbital in over 200 executions, and federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have repeatedly upheld the use of pentobarbital in executions as consistent with the Eighth Amendment.
Upon the Attorney General’s direction, Acting Director Hurwitz adopted the Addendum to the Federal Execution Protocol and, in accordance with 28 C.F.R. Part 26, scheduled executions for the following individuals:
  • Daniel Lewis Lee, a member of a white supremacist group, murdered a family of three, including an eight-year-old girl. After robbing and shooting the victims with a stun gun, Lee covered their heads with plastic bags, sealed the bags with duct tape, weighed down each victim with rocks, and threw the family of three into the Illinois bayou.  On May 4, 1999, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas found Lee guilty of numerous offenses, including three counts of murder in aid of racketeering, and he was sentenced to death.  Lee’s execution is scheduled to occur on Dec. 9, 2019.
  • Lezmond Mitchell stabbed to death a 63-year-old grandmother and forced her nine-year-old granddaughter to sit beside her lifeless body for a 30 to 40-mile drive. Mitchell then slit the girl’s throat twice, crushed her head with 20-pound rocks, and severed and buried both victims’ heads and hands.  On May 8, 2003, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona found Mitchell guilty of numerous offenses, including first degree murder, felony murder, and carjacking resulting in murder, and he was sentenced to death.  Mitchell’s execution is scheduled to occur on Dec. 11, 2019.
  • Wesley Ira Purkey violently raped and murdered a 16-year-old girl, and then dismembered, burned, and dumped the young girl’s body in a septic pond. He also was convicted in state court for using a claw hammer to bludgeon to death an 80-year-old woman who suffered from polio and walked with a cane.  On Nov. 5, 2003, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri found Purkey guilty of kidnapping a child resulting in the child’s death, and he was sentenced to death. Purkey’s execution is scheduled to occur on Dec. 13, 2019.
  • Alfred Bourgeois physically and emotionally tortured, sexually molested, and then beat to death his two-and-a-half-year-old daughter. On March 16, 2004, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas found Bourgeois guilty of multiple offenses, including murder, and he was sentenced to death.  Bourgeois’ execution is scheduled to occur on Jan. 13, 2020.
  • Dustin Lee Honken shot and killed five people—two men who planned to testify against him and a single, working mother and her ten-year-old and six-year-old daughters. On Oct. 14, 2004, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa found Honken guilty of numerous offenses, including five counts of murder during the course of a continuing criminal enterprise, and he was sentenced to death.  Honken’s execution is scheduled to occur on Jan. 15, 2020.
Each of these inmates has exhausted their appellate and post-conviction remedies, and currently no legal impediments prevent their executions, which will take place at U.S. Penitentiary Terre Haute, Indiana.  Additional executions will be scheduled at a later date.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, September 21, 2018

DOJ OIG: A Message from the Inspector General: Report on the BOP’s Contract Awarded to Sealaska Constructors, LLC to Build Facilities at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut

I just love the new format.

Clean. Simple. Cut to the chase.

Prison conditions are bad because no one was paying attention during procurement which is a likely indicator of stealin'.


Results in Brief

We determined that the BOP solicited and entered into a sole-source contract with SCL in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and that SCL constructed the facilities in accordance with BOP specifications. However, we identified several weaknesses in the BOP’s pre-award project planning. For example, the BOP had not anticipated significant problems with its plan to convert FCI Danbury’s existing federal prison camp (FPC) to a facility with a higher security level. By the time the BOP had identified the problems and implemented an alternative plan, it had already paid over $1.7 million to construct an entry building that was no longer necessary. Our report also describes weaknesses in the BOP’s: (1) planning for critical institutional aspects, such as programming, food services, and health services; (2) acquisition planning; (3) contractor performance evaluation; and (4) contract pricing procedures.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, May 18, 2018

DOJ: Howdy Doody, Hugh Hurwitz - Detroit-style

Image result for well howdy partner girl 1950s
Howdy Doody, Detroit style.
Well, Howdy Doody, partner, welcome to the fun, Detroit Style!

Hugh has a background in child welfare procurement.

Hugh has a background in human intelligence.

Hugh knows about privatization.

Hugh has a background saving children because he knows what they do to the children.


Cornerstone … is not a prison, it is a juvenile center,” said Hugh Hurwitz, a BOP spokesman. 

2013 Walton Family Foundation Grants





Attorney General Sessions Announces Hugh Hurwitz as the Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons

Image result for Hugh Hurwitz
Hugh Hurwitz
Attorney General Jeff Sessions today announced that Hugh Hurwitz will begin serving as the Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons on May 19, 2018, following Former Director Mark Inch’s resignation.

“I am pleased to announce Hugh Hurwitz as the Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Hugh has honorably served the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Prisons and the American people throughout his distinguished career of federal service.” said Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “I would also like to thank Mark Inch for proudly serving the Department of Justice as the Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and wish him luck in his future endeavors.”

Mr. Hurwitz began his career with the Bureau of Prisons as a law clerk in the Office of General Counsel in 1988. In 2003, Mr. Hurwitz was selected as the Chief of Acquisitions and Grants Services at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), later becoming the FDA's Chief of Information Technology Shared Services. In 2007, he was appointed Senior Procurement Executive for the U.S. Department of Education (ED) before being promoted to Deputy Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Hurwitz joined NASA's Office of Inspector General in 2012 as the Assistant Inspector General for Management. In 2015, he returned to the Bureau of Prisons as the Senior Deputy Assistant Director of the Information, Policy and Public Affairs Division. In 2017, Mr. Hurwitz was named Assistant Director for the Reentry Services Division.

As Assistant Director, Mr. Hurwitz oversaw a wide variety of areas, including mental health and drug treatment, community placement, and the education, vocational and recreation training programs for federal inmates nationwide. Mr. Hurwitz was responsible for coordinating efforts with other disciplines, agencies, and organizations to facilitate the successful reintegration of inmates back to their communities upon release.

In 1987, Mr. Hurwitz received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from the University of Rochester. In 1990, he received his Juris Doctor degree from American University, Washington College of Law. 

Fed Phaseout on Private Prisons: What It Means for Juvenile Offenders


Following a damning report from its inspector general’s office, the Department of Justice announced late last week that the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) would gradually move away from contracting with private corrections agencies to securely confine federal inmates.
There are 22,000 BOP inmates housed in private facilities now, and the announcement is expected to precipitate a drop to 14,000 by next year. All contracts for private prison beds would sunset in a five-year window.
YSI-MB-PageHow does this affect the juvenile justice field? Based on Youth Services Insider‘s initial inquiries, not much, based on the nature of BOP’s juvenile contracts and how it differentiates them from adult correctional settings.
BOP policy is that juveniles convicted in adult court are not to be incarcerated in a federal prison until they turn 18, which means there are two implications to consider here.
The first is where BOP holds convicted youth until they reach 18. This is never a huge number; there are less than 30 convicted juveniles in the custody of BOP.
As mentioned, they can’t go to a BOP prison until they are adults, so the agency has to contract for their arrangements. But surprisingly, almost nothing will change for this group.
BOP contracts with one private provider, the Colorado-based Cornerstone Programs, for secure juvenile beds. BOP pays for space at Cornerstone’s facility in Post, Texas.
But even though the facility is secure and operated by a for-profit entity, it will not be subject to the overall policy change.
“Cornerstone … is not a prison, it is a juvenile center,” said Hugh Hurwitz, a BOP spokesman.
At any given time, a significant portion of juveniles in BOP custody are youth from Washington, D.C., who are dealt with in federal court when they are transferred to the adult system.
There will also be no change in how these youth are handled. BOP currently contracts with the city to house these juveniles in a single unit of the Correction Treatment Facility, an annex to the city’s jail.
As of right now, that facility is operated by a private prison provider, the Corrections Corporation of America. But plans have already been made for the city to take control of the facility in early 2017, and the juvenile unit is already staffed by city corrections officials.
BOP contracts with state and local corrections, known as intergovernmental agreements (IGA), will not change as a result of the planned phaseout of providers.
Aside from D.C. youth, many of the youth in BOP custody hail from Indian country. To that end, the agency has IGA relationships with North Dakota, Pennington County, South Dakota, and Maine.
The rest of BOP’s juvenile-related contracts are for non-secure beds in places with high Native American populations:
  • Our Home, Inc, Huron, S.D.
  • Our Home, Inc., Parkston, S.D.
  • AMI Kids Non-Secure Juvenile, Cuba, N.M.
  • McCrossan Boys Ranch, Sioux Falls, S.D.
All of those providers are nonprofits, but even if they weren’t, those contracts would be fine. If Cornerstone’s facility isn’t being deemed a “prison,” then certainly contracts for non-secure beds are safe.
The other juvenile justice factor here is whether the changes will influence where convicted juveniles end up after age 18. BOP does currently contract with Management and Training Corp. to operate Giles W. Dalby, a minimum-security facility in the same town as the Cornerstone juvenile center.
Many of the D.C. juvenile inmates are sent to Rivers, a low-security prison in North Carolina. Rivers became the primary receiver of D.C. inmates after the National Capital Revitalization Act of 1997 forced the closure of the D.C.-operated Lorton Correctional Complex.
Rivers did not get a glowing review in the inspector general’s report that prompted the move away from private contracts. From the report:
“Rivers had the highest rates of contraband finds (excluding cell phones), inmate assaults on staff, uses of force, guilty findings on inmate discipline cases, inmate grievances, positive drug tests, inmate-on-inmate sexual misconduct and the lowest phone monitoring rate.”
It’s worth noting, though, that someone who works with juvenile offenders in the federal system said several federally run prisons housing D.C. inmates are far worse than Rivers.
Rivers was built in 2000 by GEO Group, and the company has operated it on contract since 2001. So BOP will have to find new space for about 1,100 offenders, or perhaps buy the prison from GEO.