In the wake of the settlement in the Right To Lie case, parents now have case precedent.
You will stop lying to steal and sell our children.
We may not be able to afford, let alone, find a competent attorney, but we are capable of invoking the powers of our civil rights, and filing in the court.
Typically, the Chancery, clerks of the court will rely upon internet searches on the merits of the case, which is why I first started blogging, for there was no verifiable source or historic reservoir of information for the fraud in foster care and adoption.
Unfortunately, there has been a very coordinated effort to promulgate propaganda which discredits the legal claims put forth by the original sources, the original parents.
What is even worse is the fact that there are masses of individuals online, social media, that are fanatical when it comes to the sensationalism behind the psychosexual propaganda, the likes of that pizzagate crap and "The Idiot Known As Q", fueled by questionable financial sources.
These anonymous and online personalities shall be held accountable for promoting propaganda, for monetary and other purposes.
With these two, aforementioned propaganda factors, federal judges, trained and sequestered from reality, encased in the bubble called Public Private Partnerships jacked-legged research and training, with only "pre-Emancipation Proclamation" case law to make a decision, parents have no chance, whatsoever, to successfully litigate.
Parents, rather, pro se litigants who take the risk of further public ridicule, for the passionate purposes of saving their children from a life of torture in foster care and adoption, and file in the courts, do so, not out of greed, for no dollar amount will make the parents or the children whole again, but do so to preserve the historic record.
The National Archives have been ravished and systematically destroyed for years in child welfare.
The pro se is now the keeper of the record.
Here is background on Kansas trafficking tiny humans.
Whether or not we win, we will not be stopped and you will stop lying to steal and sell our children, and you will cease and desist doing it in the name of the tax exempt god.
The question I present to the Courts, for legal preparation, of course, is this: "Do parents have civil rights since children have no civil rights?" because children, with all their identification, are still on the books as moveable chattel and I formulate the question of civil rights as a question of property rights, as opposed to parental rights.
Godspeed.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment