The Tale Of Gerrymandering & SCOTUS: How To Cloak The Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution - Stealin' The Children, Land & Vote By Blasphemy

Origins of Gerrymandering - CPS

There is a blog SCOTUS clerks use as reference when it comes to making decisions about gerrymandering cases.

This particular article, below, is about gerrymandering, which just so happens to be false advisement, which is used as obviation in generating court opinions and the law of the land because it omits to tell the tale of Child Protective Services as the Gerry Secret Society, to become so affectionately called in the United States, gerrymandering.

This is fraud because gerrymandering is the act of stealin' the children, land & vote, the residuals of the peculiar institution, whereby, SCOTUS has ruled is constitutional; hence, slavery was never abolished, due to the "Exception Clause" of the Thirteenth Amendment.

SCOTUS Realizes Gerrymandering Is Constitutional Stealin' The Children, Land & Votes Under The Thirteenth Amendment Exception Clause

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The Allodial Title Holder of the Children's Trust Bonds

The following is the meaning of a bond and its many legal machinations of bondage, for children are immoveable chattels, attached to the allodial title of land, because children cannot be emancipated until the juridic age of 15 years.

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=bonds

15 U.S. Code SUBCHAPTER III—TRUST INDENTURES

The following is the factual, recorded, origins, found in multiple attestation, of Gerrymandering, and the Gerry Secret Society, the response to Emancipation Proclamation: the creation of - 

Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children

CHILDREN'S HOUSE, INC. NONPROFIT

Company Number

16120

Status

Inactive Merged Out

Incorporation Date

1 December 1920 (over 99 years ago)

Dissolution Date

18 April 2000

Company Type

DOMESTIC NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION

Jurisdiction

New York (US)

Registered Address

• 100 EAST OLD COUNTRY RD, BOX 510, MINEOLA, NEW YORK, 11501
• United States

Previous Names

• CHILDREN'S HOUSE, INC.
• NASSAU CHILDREN'S HOUSE, INC.
• NASSAU CHILDREN'S SHELTER, INC.
• SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN, NASSAU COUNTY, INC.

The Response 1874-1875

SPCC Founding 1874
Henry Bergh and Elbridge Gerry, aware that the hour for children had finally come, recruited respected philanthropist John D. Wright and formally pledged themselves to the establishment of organized child protection.
Children's Protective Society
The undersigned, desirous of rescuing the unprotected children
of this city and State
from the cruelty and demoralization which
neglect and abandonment engender'
hereby engage to aid, with their sympathy and support,
the organization and working of a Children's Protective Society,
having in view the realization of so important a purpose.
On December 15, 1874, the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded and organized. Gerry annunciated its unique purpose:
"to rescue little children from the cruelty and demoralization which neglect, abandonment and improper treatment engender; to aid by all lawful means in the enforcement of the laws intended for their protection and benefit; to secure by like means the prompt conviction and punishment of all persons violating such laws and especially such persons as cruelly ill treat and shamefully neglect such little children of whom they claim the care, custody or control."
NYSPCC Incorporation 1875
On Tuesday, April 27, 1875, the SPCC was incorporated as The New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, the first child protection agency in the world. John D. Wright became its first president, Gerry and Bergh vice-presidents.

But this is what they were really doing:

Humanitarian reformers had expressed concern for children before the 1870s, organizing efforts to end the corporal punishment of school children, creating institutions to care for ORPHANS, and even sending orphans by train to foster families in the West. But reformers were reluctant to interfere in families, which had a recognized right to privacy. By the 1870s, the relative weights of the concern for children and the concern for family privacy had shifted. Mary Ellen's residence with foster parents (her biological parents were dead) may have eased her protectors' willingness to cross that boundary. Differences in class and culture also facilitated the creation of the SPCCs. The organizations were directed by wealthy, conservative, Protestant white men, whereas their clientele were mostly poor, Catholic immigrant families or poor black families. These were powerful distinctions during the late nineteenth century.
Their founders conceived of the SPCCs as law enforcement agencies. Agents were to find abused children–on the street or through tips made by concerned neighbors, relatives, and even the abused children themselves–investigate their families, and prosecute abusers. Many states gave the societies police powers, such as the right to issue warrants, or allowed the police to aid them. Most importantly, "the cruelty" (as SPCC agents were sometimes known in poor neighborhoods) could remove children from their homes.

Learn more: BEVERLY TRAN: SCOTUS Realizes Gerrymandering Is Constitutional Stealin' The Children, Land & Votes Under The Thirteenth Amendment Exception Clause http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2019/10/scotus-realizes-gerrymandering-is.html#ixzz6PJ8lR5AB
Stop Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare

The following is false information, intentionally manufactured to manipulate the public record, to control justice, in favor of the publishing blasphemer, because I just demonstrated that Jennifer Davis could have told the truth, if only she knew how to do a internet basic search, but, then again, blame could be attributed to Google, simply for the fact that they lied in testimony to U.S. House Judiciary Committee claiming they do not suppress searches, which obviouly they do, because the world is just finding out about the truth of the history of gerrymandering being the response to the Thirteenth Amendment:

#maytheheavensfall

Elbridge Gerry and the Monstrous Gerrymander

February 10, 2017

 by Jennifer Davis <==== blasphemer

Gerrymander the Blasphemer

The first “gerrymander” was drawn on a map and signed into law on February 11, 1812. Elbridge Gerry, then governor of Massachusetts, signed into law a redistricting plan designed to keep his political party in power in the upcoming election. Upset that the Federalist Party was critical of James Madison’s foreign policy, Gerry signed the reapportioning plan that heavily favored his Republican party. Gerry, a man who staunchly followed his principles even against the popular actions of his colleagues, was hesitant to sign the law. The Republican legislators sponsoring and forcing through the bill redrew “voting lines so that the Federalist vote was concentrated in a few districts, while the Republican vote was spread over many. ” The redistricting authorized by Gerry won 29 seats for the his Republican party, whereas the Federalists won a puny 11 seats.* Gerry’s district of Essex was a particularly odd shape, long on one side and curved along the north end.

“The Gerrymander: a New Species of Monster” Boston Gazette, March 26, 1812, page 2, Library of Congress Newspaper, Serials and Government Publications Division. 

When the law passed, reportedly the editor of the Boston Gazette posted the map with the newly drawn districts on his office wall, and in talking to a fellow editor, compared the shape of Gerry’s district to a salamander. The editor said, “Salamander! Call it a Gerrymander” — the portmanteau of Gerry + salamander. Gerry’s name, incidentally, is pronounced with a hard “g” as in “gary,” but over time the word “gerrymander” came to be pronounced with the soft “g” as in “jerry,” the pronunciation we use today. In any case, the picture of the cartoon gerrymander map was published in the Boston Gazette on March 26, 1812, with the caption: “The horrid Monster of which this drawing is a correct representation, appeared in the County of Essex, during the last session of the Legislature.” The word has since entered into national and international political language.

Gerrymandering is a current political topic today; as always, it is usually initiated by the incumbents to retain or increase their power. When gerrymandering is taught in U.S. history classes, it is likely students will be shown a picture of the original political cartoon drawn by Elkanah Tisdale for the Gazette and held here at the Library of Congress. Gerry did not win the 1812 election for his home district despite the reapportionment. He did, however, go on to become James Madison’s second vice president later in 1812. He was a signer of the Declaration of Independence, a member of the House of Representatives, twice governor of Massachusetts, and (full disclosure) he proposed the founding of the Library of Congress; he’d probably be dismayed to find this idea is how his name is remembered. Nevertheless, Gerry is forever tied to an important concept in American legal history.

If you’re interested in learning more about modern gerrymandering and the law, here is a shortlist of some of our recent holdings, and a map of Essex County:

KF4905.B85 2010 Bullock, Charles S., 1942-  Redistricting: the most political activity in America.

KF4930.H37 2014 Hasen, Richard L. Legislation, statutory interpretation, and election law : examples and explanations.

KF4905 .M29 2016 McGann, Anthony J. Gerrymandering in America: the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the future of popular sovereignty.

KF4905 .R39 2010 The realist’s guide to redistricting: avoiding the legal pitfalls. 2^nd ed.

KF4891.S74 2004 Stephenson, D. Grier. The right to vote: rights and liberties under the law.

KF4557 .S74 2014 Stevens, John Paul,  1920-  Six amendments: how and why we should change the Constitution.

KF4886 .T65 2013 Tokaji, Daniel P. Election law in a nutshell.

G3763.E7F7 1812 .E8 Essex County; Worcester County.

*source: Selesky, Harold E. Encyclopedia of the American Revolution: Library of Military History, 2006

The following is the history of gerrymandering by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children:

https://nyspcc.org/wp-content/uploads/booklet.pdf

The following is a video on the U.S. history of Gerrymandering.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

SCOTUS Realizes Gerrymandering Is Constitutional Stealin' The Children, Land & Votes Under The Thirteenth Amendment Exception Clause

How is it one can "constitutionally" gerrymander Congressional Districts when gerrymandering is the origin of Child Protective Services for stealin' the children, land and votes, or rather, the residuals of the peculiar institution?

Gerrymandering was named after Elbridge Gerry, former Vice President and grand father of Eldridge Gerry founded the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, where what we know today as Child Protective Services was known as the Gerry Society.

"First, we steal the children, the land, then
the votes!" said Gerry ordering his
Secret Society (now known as CPS)
for the next round of redistricting.

The Response 1874-1875

SPCC Founding 1874
Henry Bergh and Elbridge Gerry, aware that the hour for children had finally come, recruited respected philanthropist John D. Wright and formally pledged themselves to the establishment of organized child protection.
Children's Protective Society
The undersigned, desirous of rescuing the unprotected children
of this city and State
from the cruelty and demoralization which
neglect and abandonment engender'
hereby engage to aid, with their sympathy and support,
the organization and working of a Children's Protective Society,
having in view the realization of so important a purpose.
On December 15, 1874, the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded and organized. Gerry annunciated its unique purpose:
"to rescue little children from the cruelty and demoralization which neglect, abandonment and improper treatment engender; to aid by all lawful means in the enforcement of the laws intended for their protection and benefit; to secure by like means the prompt conviction and punishment of all persons violating such laws and especially such persons as cruelly ill treat and shamefully neglect such little children of whom they claim the care, custody or control."
NYSPCC Incorporation 1875
On Tuesday, April 27, 1875, the SPCC was incorporated as The New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, the first child protection agency in the world. John D. Wright became its first president, Gerry and Bergh vice-presidents.

But this is what they were really doing:

Humanitarian reformers had expressed concern for children before the 1870s, organizing efforts to end the corporal punishment of school children, creating institutions to care for ORPHANS, and even sending orphans by train to foster families in the West. But reformers were reluctant to interfere in families, which had a recognized right to privacy. By the 1870s, the relative weights of the concern for children and the concern for family privacy had shifted. Mary Ellen's residence with foster parents (her biological parents were dead) may have eased her protectors' willingness to cross that boundary. Differences in class and culture also facilitated the creation of the SPCCs. The organizations were directed by wealthy, conservative, Protestant white men, whereas their clientele were mostly poor, Catholic immigrant families or poor black families. These were powerful distinctions during the late nineteenth century.
Their founders conceived of the SPCCs as law enforcement agencies. Agents were to find abused children–on the street or through tips made by concerned neighbors, relatives, and even the abused children themselves–investigate their families, and prosecute abusers. Many states gave the societies police powers, such as the right to issue warrants, or allowed the police to aid them. Most importantly, "the cruelty" (as SPCC agents were sometimes known in poor neighborhoods) could remove children from their homes.

This is about someone up in SCOTUS finally figuring it out that they opined on the residuals of the peculiar institution.

I am going with John Roberts...

Yes, this is about parental rights, where, in the modern since of human trafficking, a foreign corporation can go in after a geographic region is stripped of all its economic resources, where industries are shipped overseas, where Public Private PartnerShips swashbuckl in and snatches all the children, under the laws of chattel, land in massive, fraudulent foreclosure schemes, to embark on the salvific mission to save the savages, or rather "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth), to implement their Social Impact Bond Programs, whereby, a default of a civil debt to the foreign corporation, transfers parental rights to the corporation, the salvage the souls in billing for their crappy predictive modeling theoretical databases to Medicaid.

"The gift of a tiny human is very merry".

Quintessentially, Michigan did, constitutionally gerrymander the Congressional Districts, which means we are in a Constitutional Crisis, because that means the Thirteenth Amendment Exception validates gerrymandering, which means that slavery was never abolished.

Oh, this is going to be so much fun because it is that time of year where the very special ones like to really adore the tiny humans.

Where is SIGTARP?

Anyone up for a warm mug of RFRA?

I have popcorn and all my windows are almost sealed, as I have no heat for the winter, again.

SCOTUS Vacates Ruling That Found Michigan Unconstitutionally Gerrymandered Congressional Districts

The United States Supreme Court on Monday cancelled a federal court’s decision, which found Michigan’s congressional voting districts were unconstitutional because they were gerrymandered to such a degree that it violated voters’ First Amendment rights and the Constitution’s Equal Protection clause.

Gerrymandering is the setting of electoral boundaries to favor the political interests of the party in power.

A three-judge panel on the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Michigan ruled in April that 34 of the state’s voting districts were specifically designed to disadvantage Democratic voters, deliberately diluting the power of their vote to ensure a particular partisan outcome. The panel’s ruling ordered the state to redraw the voting district maps, calling partisan gerrymandering a “pernicious practice that undermines our democracy.”

The order was expected in light of the Justices June decision in Rucho v. Common Cause, a landmark decision which greatly reined in federal court’s ability to intervene in political gerrymandering cases. The Court ruled that the partisan gerrymandering issue was “beyond the reach of federal courts.”

In a 5-4 vote along ideological lines, Chief Justice John Roberts invoked the court’s Political Question doctrine in finding it constitutionally permissible for voting districts to be drawn with the specific intent to disadvantage voters of a particular political ideology. The ruling was seen as a severe blow to voting rights advocates challenging the disproportionate impact gerrymandering can have on voting power.

I used to tell my Sweetie about using a GINI Coefficient.  Basically, there are no political lines because you can use an actual measurement tool called poverty. If you have a district with statistically significant rate of poverty, where you can use school age children who qualify for free or reduced school lunches, you know you have an economic disparity, where you can start by looking at why the economic disparity exists. Nine times out of ten you shall find stealin' the children, land and votes. See, three variables. Very simple equation using public data. But, alas, we are dealing with "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

Roberts reasoned that the question before the court– “determining when political gerrymandering has gone too far”– could not be grounded in a “limited and precise rationale” because the issue “lacks judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving.”

He conceded that the ruling may enable increasingly inequitable political representation, but said that such a result does not violate any constitutional mandate where no standard for determination exists. Roberts did not prevent the court from intervening in cases of racial gerrymandering.

You see that? Not one mention of the DHS absentee ballot investigation.  What if those political districts were manufactured through fake ass absentee ballots? What about TARP?  This is the part of where I go pshaw.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote a scathing dissent in which she called the majority’s decision a low-point for democracy.

“I think it important to underscore that fact: The majority disputes none of what I have said (or will say) about how gerrymanders undermine democracy. Indeed, the majority concedes (really, how could it not?) that gerrymandering is ‘incompatible with democratic principles,’” she said from the bench.

Scotus Orders by Law&Crime on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Michigan Fails To Explain Foreign Corporate Parental Rights & The Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution Of Gerrymandering In Human Asset Management Private Prisons

How can Michigan construct proposed legislation to end prison gerrymandering when it does not even legally define what gerrymandering is?

SCOTUS Realizes Gerrymandering Is Constitutional Stealin' The Children, Land & Votes Under The Thirteenth Amendment Exception Clause

Now, that I have provided the legal origins of the entire doctrine of gerrymandering, we shall move into the next phase, by identifying the cui bono, or rather the national origins of the financial benefactors in the passage of this Bill.

SENATE BILL NO. 759
January 28, 2020, Introduced by Senator SANTANA and referred to the Committee on Elections.
A bill to require that the pre-incarceration address of incarcerated individuals be reported when providing information for voting district population counts; and to provide for the powers and duties of certain state officers and entities.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
Sec. 1. As used in this act:
(a) "Department" means the department of corrections.
(b) "Pre-incarceration address" means the address at which an incarcerated individual resided before the individual's current incarceration.
Sec. 2. For purposes of reporting the residency of an individual who is incarcerated in a correctional institution operated by the department, as that information relates to a population count that is used for the establishment of a voting district, the department shall report the individual's pre-incarceration address.

Found in this Bill, we have a term, that is arbitrarily and capriciously defined as "pre-incarceration address".

'Your Body Being Used': Where Prisoners Who Can't Vote Fill Voting Districts

When an individual is duly order by the court of law to be placed under the auspices of the State, there is a transfer of the grant of parental right of the chattel, meaning, the prison, being a private prison in most cases, becomes the corporate parent.

The corporate parent has the legal right, by proxy, to execute the right to vote, which is done through absentee ballots.

The term which has been traditionally used to describe this prison gerrymandering is called vote packing, which I watched bloom in Detroit.

So, if voting is based upon residency, and not domicile, how come no one has raised this issue of law?

I am going to go out there and just say that we are dealing with the application of private commercial law over the management of human capital assets, such as the right to vote.

The majority of individuals who go to prison, are sentenced under the moral turpitude laws of poverty, meaning, they committed crimes because they were tired of being hungry, or, what I call as being victims of "Whoops" human socioeconomic human lab rat experimental programs gone horribly wrong.

Either way, someone needs to explain to me why gerrymandering is even considered legal, because it is just another fancy way of saying stealin' the children, land and vote.

Gerrymandering was named after Elbridge Gerry, former Vice President and grand father of Eldridge Gerry founded the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, where what we know today as Child Protective Services was known as the Gerry Society.

Michigan bill aims to end 'prison gerrymandering' before 2020 census

Proposed legislation would change how Michigan's prisoners are counted in legislative and congressional districts, a move that researchers say could shift political power away from rural areas that claim a significant number of incarcerated people as constituents.

Senate Bill 759 aims to end the practice of counting prisoners as residents in the districts where they're currently incarcerated, which critics call "prison gerrymandering."

The bill, introduced by Sen. Sylvia Santana, D-Detroit, would require that prisoners' last-known addresses be used when establishing voting districts. Santana said the change is necessary to draw districts "of equal and fair proportions."

“Prisoners are people, too, and they should be counted in their home communities if we are to build a truly representative democracy," she said.

Like prisoners in all states except Maine and Vermont, the roughly 38,000 people serving time in Michigan Department of Corrections facilities cannot vote.

Advocates argue that counting prisoners in the districts where they're incarcerated, even though they're not part of surrounding community and cannot vote, unfairly boosts the populations of those areas.

"Communities with prisons have their political power inflated because their populations are inflated because of people who are in prison, and other communities see their votes sort of diluted," said Cara Brumfield, senior policy analyst for the Georgetown Center on Poverty and Inequality’s Economic Security and Opportunity Initiative.

More: Analysis: Detroit will be toughest US city to count population for 2020 Census

More: Michigan population increases for 8th straight year, but remains under 10 million

Political districts are redrawn every 10 years after the census.Santana hopes to change the law by April 1, designated as Census Day, when the U.S. Census Bureau says every home should have received an invitation to participate in the census.

Santana's legislation stands to have the greatest effect on state House districts that claim a high percentage of prisoners as constituents, said Aleks Kajstura, legal director of the Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit advocating to count incarcerated people as residents of their home addresses.

"There would be less representational power concentrated in these few districts that have these huge incarcerated populations," she said. "There wouldn't be anywhere in the state that would gain the same amount of power that these districts lost."

There were three House districts drawn after the 2010 census that claimed prisoners as more than 5% of their population, Kajstura said.

Just more than 7% of people in District 70 were incarcerated when the mid-Michigan district was drawn after the 2010 census, according to Kajstura. That district is represented by Rep. Jim Lower, R-Greenville, who said Thursday that he didn't have enough information to form an opinion on Santana's bill. He added that voter turnout in his district, which includes three prisons in Montcalm and Gratiot counties, is low compared to surrounding areas.

It's unlikely that the proposal would have a significant effect on congressional districts. It wouldn't affect elections at the municipal or county levels because state law excludes state prisoners from being counted for representation purposes.

Advocates have been fighting for years for the U.S. Census Bureau to change its longstanding practice of counting prisoners as residents of the district where they're incarcerated.

The bureau hasn't altered its policy, but seven states have passed legislation similar to Santana's bill. After the census count, those states will adjust the data to reallocate incarcerated people for redistricting. Similar legislation is pending in eight other states, Kajstura said.

A state-level change to where Michigan's prisoners are counted would have no bearing on the distribution of federal funds for services and infrastructure because funding formulas don't use redistricting data, Kajstura said.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

DEFANGO: #overstock Patrick Byrne and the Russia Hoax #thefamily National Prayer Breakfast - Why Gerrymandering Is The Art Of Trafficking Tiny Humans

Netflix produced the show The Family.

The Family has a segment on Maria Butina.

Maria Butina started out in Michigan.

Michigan is the generator of the Pro Life Movement.

The Pro Life Movement is founded in the Michigan Catholic Conference.

The Michigan Catholic Conference is under the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Christians promulgate the Child Welfare System.

The Michigan Child Welfare System has a problem trafficking tiny humans through Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare.

Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare invests in real estate fraud schemes of the Detroit Land Bank Authority through Cinnaire.

Cinnaire funnels the cryptocurrency through Michigan Children's Trust Funds.

The Michigan Children's Trust Fund has a sole purpose to fund Propaganda Campaigns.

The Propaganda Campaign started in Child Welfare Gerrymandering.

Gerrymandering was named after Elbridge Gerry, former Vice President and grand father of Eldridge Gerry founded the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, where what we know today as Child Protective Services was known as the Gerry Society.

"First, we steal the children, the land, then
the votes!" said Gerry ordering his
Secret Society (now known as CPS)
for the next round of redistricting.

The Response 1874-1875

SPCC Founding 1874
Henry Bergh and Elbridge Gerry, aware that the hour for children had finally come, recruited respected philanthropist John D. Wright and formally pledged themselves to the establishment of organized child protection.
Children's Protective Society
The undersigned, desirous of rescuing the unprotected children
of this city and State
from the cruelty and demoralization which
neglect and abandonment engender'
hereby engage to aid, with their sympathy and support,
the organization and working of a Children's Protective Society,
having in view the realization of so important a purpose.
On December 15, 1874, the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded and organized. Gerry annunciated its unique purpose:
"to rescue little children from the cruelty and demoralization which neglect, abandonment and improper treatment engender; to aid by all lawful means in the enforcement of the laws intended for their protection and benefit; to secure by like means the prompt conviction and punishment of all persons violating such laws and especially such persons as cruelly ill treat and shamefully neglect such little children of whom they claim the care, custody or control."
NYSPCC Incorporation 1875
On Tuesday, April 27, 1875, the SPCC was incorporated as The New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, the first child protection agency in the world. John D. Wright became its first president, Gerry and Bergh vice-presidents.

But this is what they were really doing:

Humanitarian reformers had expressed concern for children before the 1870s, organizing efforts to end the corporal punishment of school children, creating institutions to care for ORPHANS, and even sending orphans by train to foster families in the West. But reformers were reluctant to interfere in families, which had a recognized right to privacy. By the 1870s, the relative weights of the concern for children and the concern for family privacy had shifted. Mary Ellen's residence with foster parents (her biological parents were dead) may have eased her protectors' willingness to cross that boundary. Differences in class and culture also facilitated the creation of the SPCCs. The organizations were directed by wealthy, conservative, Protestant white men, whereas their clientele were mostly poor, Catholic immigrant families or poor black families. These were powerful distinctions during the late nineteenth century.
Their founders conceived of the SPCCs as law enforcement agencies. Agents were to find abused children–on the street or through tips made by concerned neighbors, relatives, and even the abused children themselves–investigate their families, and prosecute abusers. Many states gave the societies police powers, such as the right to issue warrants, or allowed the police to aid them. Most importantly, "the cruelty" (as SPCC agents were sometimes known in poor neighborhoods) could remove children from their homes.

Those catholic immigrant families were mostly of Irish and Italian, who did not speak English, where there were multiple laws passed to pick them up off the streets and move them out west, or into other places that needed tiny humans for the first reengineering of the residuals of the peculiar institution.

Now, they use predictive modeling crap.

GO BLUE: Predictive Modelling Crappers Share Their Child Welfare Gerrymandering False Claims Methodologies For Stealin' Children, Land & Votes

Gerrymandering was the bailiwick of TARP, to interfere in the 2016, and back, elections.

TARP money and its revenue maximization schemes like property taxes, were laundered through Microsoft backdoor to more cryptocurrency fraud schemes like what they did in Detroit by and through the Detroit Land Bank Authority.

When you do not live there, you cannot vote there.

Peter Strzok has a history with Catholic Charities.

Catholic Charities is out of Michigan.

Michigan's Child Welfare System sucks and has maps for gerrymandering.

Gerrymandering is election interference.

Everyone who participated in gerrymandering was mean to my Sweetie.

And I shall leave it here, for now, because I am not ready to get into the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

Besides, still working on the transposable model, for generalizational purposes, of course, so if you do not like what I have just said, it sounds like you will not be having a great day today.

#FreeMariaButina

#sayhisname

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Michigan Secretary Of State Jocelyn Benson Is In Over Her Head - We Are Going To SCOTUS

Something is telling me that SCOTUS will intervene, but, hey, what do I know?

I know the three-judge panel knows what I know.

Michigan Secretary Of State Jocelyn Benson Takes It Upon Herself To Negotiate Gerrymandering Public Private Partnership Lawsuit - Completely Forgets About SIGTARP

I also know Trump's State of the Union address is Monday, the day before the high-stakes trail on gerrymandering starts.

Court rejects settlement in Michigan gerrymandering suit

Lansing — A lawsuit alleging partisan gerrymandering by Michigan's Republican-led Legislature is heading toward trial next week after a three-judge panel rejected a settlement proposed by Democratic Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and plaintiffs.

Benson does not have the authority to enter into the proposed consent decree without the blessing of the Michigan Legislature, the federal judges said Friday in a ruling rejecting the deal, which would have required reconfiguration of at least 11 state House seats for 2020 elections.

A trial in the high-stakes case is set to start Tuesday, but the U.S. Supreme Court could still intervene.

GOP attorneys are attempting to delay the case, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Friday asked parties wishing to weigh in to do so by Monday at 11 a.m., a sign the high court is considering the request.

The suit was filed on behalf of the League of Women Voters and a series of Democrats who allege that congressional and legislative district boundaries approved by the Legislature in 2011 were designed to benefit Republican candidates.

In announcing plans to settle, Benson said the case included "significant evidence of partisan gerrymandering" and predicted the state would lose in court and incur significant legal costs. Here settlement focused on what she said were the most "egregious" examples of partisan gerrymandering -- and likely several neighboring districts as well.

Instead, the court could decide whether there is evidence to prove claims Republicans intentionally "packed" and "cracked" voters into certain districts.

Benson and plaintiffs had argued their proposed settlement was similar to a case out of Florida that the U.S. Supreme Court approved.

But in that case, the Florida Senate and House "explicitly consented to the relief contained in the consent decree," Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Eric Clay wrote on  behalf of the panel, which includes District Court judges Denise Page Hood and Gordon Quist.

Attorneys for GOP state House Speaker Lee Chatfield, Rep. Aaron Miller and several congressional Republicans had filed motions opposing the settlement. The court on Friday also granted a motion for the Republican-led state Senate to intervene in the case.

Clay rejected arguments from Benson and plaintiffs that they could enter into a settlement because of a Michigan Supreme Court ruling giving the Attorney General's office broad authority to sue and settle state litigation with "binding effect on Michigan's political subdivisions."

The proposed settlement "would invalidate maps approved and enacted by the Michigan Legislature," Clay wrote. "And the Michigan Constitution gives the Michigan Legislature, not any political subdivision, authority to 'enact laws to regulate the time, place and manner of all... elections.'"

 An attorney for the plaintiffs was not available, but Benson said she respects the court's decision.

"As the state’s chief election officer, I will continue efforts to resolve this lawsuit in the best interests of all voters and in compliance with constitutional requirements," Benson said in a statement.

Michigan Republicans have denied overt political bias in the district maps, but emails between map makers revealed as part of the federal case have included several partisan references and commentary on the prospects of maintaining GOP power.

Former Secretary of State Ruth Johnson, a Republican, had defended the 2011 maps, but Benson inherited the case after taking office Jan. 1 and quickly reversed course. While the settlement would have been limited in scope, the lawsuit challenges 34 congressional, state House and Senate districts.

Republican attorneys had asked to delay the trial pending the outcome of alleged gerrymandering cases from Maryland and North Carolina the Supreme Court is set to take up, with oral arguments in late March.

The three-judge panel also denied those requests, saying all parties to the case "failed to articulate sufficiently compelling justifications" for delaying the trial, but the Supreme Court is weighing a similar request.

Michigan voters in November approved creation of an independent redistricting commission that will draw new political boundaries for 2022 elections and beyond. State law had allowed the Legislature to control that process every ten years.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Bill Barr Delivers Gerrymandering Conservation Speech To Federalist Society For Trafficking Tiny Humans Month

Bill....

         Bill....

                   Bill....

Boo Boo....

Your fancy smancy pants speech was really worthy of applause for your demonstration of not knowing about U.S. history, so, I thought I would pull you to the side, once again, and whisper in your ear about something you really need to stop doing, and that is promulgating the trafficking of tiny humans.

Yes, that is correct.

You like to champion the acquisition, procurement and purveying of tiny human goods under chattel law, because that is what you are conserving in what you understand as the heirarchial order of human ownership for a civil society.

Here, you shall find, a quick tutorial on the origins of gerrymandering.

Gerrymandering was named after Elbridge Gerry, former Vice President and grand father of Eldridge Gerry founded the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, where what we know today as Child Protective Services was known as the Gerry Society.

"First, we steal the children, the land, then
the votes!" said Gerry ordering his
Secret Society (now known as CPS)
for the next round of redistricting.

The Response 1874-1875

SPCC Founding 1874

Henry Bergh and Elbridge Gerry, aware that the hour for children had finally come, recruited respected philanthropist John D. Wright and formally pledged themselves to the establishment of organized child protection.

Children's Protective Society

The undersigned, desirous of rescuing the unprotected children

of this city and State

from the cruelty and demoralization which

neglect and abandonment engender'

hereby engage to aid, with their sympathy and support,

the organization and working of a Children's Protective Society,

having in view the realization of so important a purpose.

On December 15, 1874, the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded and organized. Gerry annunciated its unique purpose:

"to rescue little children from the cruelty and demoralization which neglect, abandonment and improper treatment engender; to aid by all lawful means in the enforcement of the laws intended for their protection and benefit; to secure by like means the prompt conviction and punishment of all persons violating such laws and especially such persons as cruelly ill treat and shamefully neglect such little children of whom they claim the care, custody or control."

NYSPCC Incorporation 1875

On Tuesday, April 27, 1875, the SPCC was incorporated as The New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, the first child protection agency in the world. John D. Wright became its first president, Gerry and Bergh vice-presidents.

But this is what they were really doing:

Humanitarian reformers had expressed concern for children before the 1870s, organizing efforts to end the corporal punishment of school children, creating institutions to care for ORPHANS, and even sending orphans by train to foster families in the West. But reformers were reluctant to interfere in families, which had a recognized right to privacy. By the 1870s, the relative weights of the concern for children and the concern for family privacy had shifted. Mary Ellen's residence with foster parents (her biological parents were dead) may have eased her protectors' willingness to cross that boundary. Differences in class and culture also facilitated the creation of the SPCCs. The organizations were directed by wealthy, conservative, Protestant white men, whereas their clientele were mostly poor, Catholic immigrant families or poor black families. These were powerful distinctions during the late nineteenth century.

Their founders conceived of the SPCCs as law enforcement agencies. Agents were to find abused children–on the street or through tips made by concerned neighbors, relatives, and even the abused children themselves–investigate their families, and prosecute abusers. Many states gave the societies police powers, such as the right to issue warrants, or allowed the police to aid them. Most importantly, "the cruelty" (as SPCC agents were sometimes known in poor neighborhoods) could remove children from their homes.

So, Bill, now that you know what the true meaning of gerrymandering is, do you think you could properly apply it to what is going in the United States when it comes to the child welfare system?

See, Betsy DeVos is a member of the Trump cabinet.

Betsy likes stealin' the children, land and votes because she does it in the name of the tax exempt god, which just so happens to be a foreign corporation.

That is gerrymandering, which is known today as Child Protective Services.

These are founding principals we should not preserve, don't ya think?

You made a promise to Chuck Grassley to honor his legacy of the False Claims Act.

So far you have failed to honor your promise you made in the public record in your confirmation hearings which means you lied.

That is called bearing false witness and when you do that, that means you have violated your oath of office, but it does not really matter because you are illegitimately appointed because Trump was illegitimately elected,  due to gerrymandering, more intuitively known as stealin' the childre, land and votes, which means, your fancy smancy pants speech was all for naught.

Carry on, Boo, Boo...carry on.

HAPPY TRAFFICKING TINY HUMANS MONTH

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Kindergarten & Gerrymandering In Michigan - Not One Mention of DOJ, DHS, SIGTARP, Obama or Holder

I missed this fun piece!

They stole the children, the land, and the votes...and "The Elected Ones" are trying to figure out why Michigan is at the bottom of the barrel of learning in the world.

There was not one mention of poverty, of which Detroit is on the top of the heap of child poverty, illiteracy, and cognitive and psychological developmental disabilities.

We could ask Fox2Detroit about its corporate history in child welfare fraud, but I am quite sure they would prefer to do that in a more legal arena.

So, in come Jim Runestad, the Michigan Senator who has been championing shared parenting his entire political career...and has done absolutely nothing.

Sorry, Jim, you know I love you but I have to call you out because I do not believe you have a clue on what you are being fed.

The Parental Rights Amendment 2.0 is off and running, rebranding child welfare, where your "Shared Parenting" is going to be a shared parenting with a corporate parent in a Public Private Partnership.

Yes, Jim is selling chattel.

Now, there is a push for mandatory kindergarten initiative for compulsory enrollment at the age of five.

This is how you scrap more data for predictive modeling crap to generate more crap to push for even more privatization in more experimental socioeconomic test transposable models for Detroit and Michigan gerrymandering crappy university white papers.

That is also how you can increase state appropriations and land speculation, too.

Not one mention of improving the lives of the parents who care for the children, being victims of this horrific implementation of corporate parental rights, or rather the acceleration a foreign invasion of civil asset forfeiture for the civil debt of being on of "The Poors".

Not one mention of forced migration, domestic and international, through the industry of trafficking tiny humans.

Each kid generates a good $7K a year for each school and that does not include all the fun, overseas, experimental Social Impact Bond programs to enrich those wonderful UCC foreign nonprofits, who do not pay any taxes because they run public education money through fake child welfare NGOs.

Yes, that was a mouthful, but I am working on my 15 second elevator pitch.

I am not going to embed any supportive links because I have a search boolean on the top right of the web version of my site that will take you to whatever your kindergarten state of mind desires on this subject matter.

I was just tickled that Kindergarten was mixed with Gerrymandering in the same show, and not once did anyone mention Detroit or the ongoing federal actions that you can find in a basic online search, or a search on my blogs.

As I know very, very few will possess the ability to understand the message I am attempting to convey, allow me to assist in one of my favorite soundbyte:

Stop stealin'!

You can click here because I know there will be very, very many who will be too confused to search the term gerrymandering due to the extreme focus on cursing my name, just because it will be the only name to come up when you do.

#perkinscoiesucks  <=== you can learn about gerrymandering here, too.

You can even watch this video and enjoy the encrypted messaging of how Obama and Holder are leading the charge to go after the people who are stealin' the children, the land and the votes.

Hope this helps, Fox2Detroit.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©