Showing posts with label Neil Barofsky. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Neil Barofsky. Show all posts

Saturday, April 18, 2020

Paul O'Neill, Progenitor Of TARP Is Extracted From Humanity

Paul O'Neill
Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, progenitor of TARP and the Detroit Land Bank Authority, is extracted from humanity.

Gerrymandering was a strong area of his expertise.

I wonder how Steve Mnuchin is doing, right about now?

According to Wikipedia:

In 1989, he was approached by President George H. W. Bush to be Secretary of Defense. O'Neill declined, but recommended Dick Cheney for the position. Bush then pursued O'Neill to chair an advisory group on education that included Lamar Alexander, Bill Brock, and Richard Riley.

#maytheheavensfall

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill dies at age 84

U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill holds a news conference at the U.N. Conference for Financing of Development in Monterrey, Mexico on March 20, 2002. O'Neill died Saturday, April 18, 2020. He was 84.

Paul O'Neill, a former Treasury secretary who broke with George W. Bush over tax policy and then produced a book critical of the administration, died Saturday. He was 84.

O'Neill's son, Paul O'Neill Jr. confirmed that his father died at his home in Pittsburgh after battling lung cancer for the last couple of years. After a few surgeries and chemotherapy, he decided against any further intervention four or five months ago, he said.

"There was some family here and he died peacefully," the son said. "Based on his situation, it was a good exit."

A former head of aluminum giant Alcoa, O'Neill served as Treasury secretary from 2001 to late 2002. He was forced to resign after he objected to a second round of tax cuts because of their impact on deficits.

O'Neill's blunt speaking style more than once got him in trouble as Treasury secretary. He sent the dollar into a tailspin briefly in his early days at Treasury when his comments about foreign exchange rates surprised markets. In the spring of 2001, O'Neill jolted markets again when during Wall Street's worst week in 11 years, he blandly declared "markets go up and markets go down."

He was more focused on the traditional Treasury secretary's job of instilling confidence during times of turbulence later that year when he helped get Wall Street re-opened after the Sept. 11 terror attacks. O'Neill was also instrumental following the attacks in beefing up the government's programs to disrupt financing to terrorist groups.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Saturday on Twitter, "Saddened to hear of the passing of the former 72nd Treasury Secretary, Paul O'Neill. He served @USTreasury and America with distinction during challenging times. My condolences to his family."

Tony Fratto, who served as O'Neill's Treasury spokesman, described O'Neill as a "working class guy" who "cared about how things impacted real people."

Fratto, currently a partner with Hamilton Place Strategies in Washington, said that one of O'Neill's passions was workplace safety, and that he would tour the Treasury building looking for safety issues that needed to be fixed.

After leaving the administration, O'Neill worked with author Ron Suskind on an explosive book covering his two years in the administration. O'Neill contended that the administration began planning the overthrow of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein right after Bush took office, eight months before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

O'Neill depicted Bush as a disengaged president who didn't encourage debate either at Cabinet meetings or in one-on-one discussions with Cabinet members. He said the lack of discussion in Cabinet meetings gave him the feeling that Bush "was like a blind man in a roomful of deaf people."

He said major decisions were often made by Bush's political team and Vice President Dick Cheney. O'Neill had been recruited to join the Cabinet by Cheney, his old friend from the Gerald Ford administration. But it was Cheney who told O'Neill that the president wanted his resignation. It was part of a move by Bush to shake up his economic team and find a better salesman for a new round of tax cuts the president hoped would stimulate a sluggish economy.

When the book, "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House and the Education of Paul O'Neill" came out in early 2004, Bush spokesman Scott McClellan discounted O'Neill's descriptions of White House decision-making and said the president was "someone that leads and acts decisively on our biggest priorities."

After leaving the Cabinet, O'Neill returned to Pittsburgh, where he had headed Alcoa from 1987 to 1999. He resumed working with the Pittsburgh Regional Health Care Initiative, a consortium of hospitals, medical societies and businesses studying ways to improve health care delivery in Western Pennsylvania. The subject had interested him since his days as a budget analyst in Washington with the Office of Management and Budget.

He also devoted time in retirement to projects that would deliver clean drinking water to Africa. As Treasury secretary, O'Neill had focused attention on poverty and combating diseases such as AIDS in Africa, touring the continent with Irish rock star Bono.

While at Alcoa, O'Neill lifted the company out of the doldrums during his 12-year stint as the Pittsburgh company's CEO. Shortly after he took the job in April 1987, he began emphasizing factory safety and employee dignity as a top priority.

His ideas weren't initially well received by profit-driven investors, who cared more about Alcoa's financial performance. After hearing one of O'Neill's first presentations as Alcoa's CEO, one money manager decided the company had put a "crazy hippie in charge" and advised his 20 largest clients to sell its stock, according to the book, "The Power of Habit" by Charles Duhigg.

That investor later called it one of his worst decisions. By the time, O'Neill stepped down as CEO in 1999, Alcoa's accident rate had plunged and its stock had soared more than seven-fold at a time it was part of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Before joining Alcoa, O'Neill had been president from 1985 to 1987 of International Paper Co., a firm he had joined in 1977 after leaving OMB.

After graduating with an economics degree from California State University in Fresno in 1961, O'Neill joined the Veterans Administration in Washington, working as a computer systems analyst. He later moved to OMB and rose to become deputy director of the budget agency from 1974 to 1977, providing budget guidance to then-President Gerald Ford.

In June 2019, O'Neill received the Gerald R. Ford Medal for Distinguished Public Service, according to a piece in his hometown paper, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Cheney and Alan Greenspan, who headed the Federal Reserve when O'Neill was Treasury secretary, are among the past recipients of the award.

O'Neill is survived by his wife, four children, 12 grandchildren and 15 great grandchildren.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

New TARP Rules: Curb Executive Pay, Bonuses, Parachutes

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill calls pay limits "a large mistake."

Feb. 4, 2009 — -- Wall Street was bearish today over President Obama's new $500,000 pay limit for executives of financial institutions who he said have come "hat in hand" asking for taxpayers' help.

The new limits, which would affect banks that accept "exceptional assistance" from the public treasury, would also impose stricter rules on golden parachutes, entertainment, holiday parties, conferences and the use of corporate jets.

Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs at the Financial Services Roundtable, expressed concerns about the new executive compensation restrictions.

"The pay scale for Wall Street is different for the pay scale for America," Talbott told ABC News. "So these numbers look large, but the market value for these executives - there's a very small talent pool of individuals that have the education, experience and knowledge to operate a global, international services firm in this day and age."

Executives may quit banks that fall under the new $500,000 pay limits, he warned.

"I don't think the issue is a dollar amount. It's being paid what you're worth… Would you be willing to work for less than what you think you're worth?" Talbott asked.

The compensation limits might also make banks hesitant to ask the federal government for help.

"Companies will have to reevaluate whether the benefits are still worth it under the new rules," he said.

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill said Obama's move "is going to be a very popular populist move.... even though I think it is a large mistake."

O'Neill, who served under President George W. Bush, told ABC News that the banks would have complied if Obama had asked them to voluntarily follow the new limits. He also pointed out that many of the banks' employees get annual bonuses, not just the top executives. Should the limits apply to them, too, O'Neill asked.

He also said the pay limits could hurt the banks' ability to compete. "To the degree there are competing institutions out there not affected by the new edict, does this give those institutions a significant competitive advantage in attracting talent?"

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs dismissed suggestions that the pay caps could hurt the already ailing banks.

"I think we've struck the right balance," Gibbs said.

Obama's pay limits were endorsed by House Minority Leader John Boehner, a Republican from Ohio.

"I think if anybody is looking to the taxpayer to help bail their company out, these kinds of executive compensation limits are appropriate," he said.

On the $500,000 pay limit, Boehner said, "I think somebody's got to pick a number. The president has picked one. I applaud him for doing it."

ABC News contacted all 30 institutions that received $1 billion or more in bailout money, and most of them ignored the calls or declined to comment.

GMAC, which got $5 billion, said it is already subject to compensation limits imposed by the Bush administration. "We intend to comply with those requirements. We have no further comment," GMAC said.

In scolding language, the president said that the changes are necessary to help stabilize the economy.

"We've got to restore trust," Obama said. "And in order to restore trust, we've got to make certain that taxpayer funds are not subsidizing excessive compensation packages on Wall Street."

The president echoed his inauguration address when he said there would be a "new era of responsibility."

"We all need to take responsibility," he said while announcing the new compensation rules with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. "And this includes executives at major financial firms who turned to the American people, hat in hand, when they were in trouble, even as they paid themselves their customary lavish bonuses."

"What gets people upset – and rightfully so – are executives being rewarded for failure. Especially when those rewards are subsidized by U.S. taxpayers," Obama said.

The $500,000 salary limit is still more than Obama makes -- $400,000 -- but is a pittance compared to the $20 million that Kenneth Lewis took home in 2007 as head of Bank of America, a corporation that needed $45 billion of public money to save it from its mountain of bad loans.

The president said the new rules announced today would be accompanied by an effort to determine "how corporate governance and compensation rules can be reformed."

Exceptions to the New Rules
There are exceptions to the new executive pay rules, however.

Banking executives can get extra compensation in restricted stock, but only stock that will not vest until taxpayers are repaid the loans, plus interest.

Companies bailed out by Uncle Sam are permitted to waive the $500,000 rule if they disclose executive compensation and allow investors a nonbinding vote on executive pay.

Banks that have already received several hundred billion dollars from the Troubled Asset Relief Program under the Bush administration won't be subject to the new rules. But several of those banks are expected to come back to the federal till for additional relief.

The new Obama TARP rules will require those companies to demonstrate they have complied with the previously issued restrictions on executive pay and lending requirements, and agree to strict monitoring and oversight going forward.

The new rules also make it harder for corporate titans to live the high life on the public dollar. They include restrictions on how the money can be spent, with a bull's-eye on such items as aviation expenses, office renovations, entertainment and corporate parties.

The new Treasury provisions expand rules established under the Bush administration. Restrictions on golden parachutes originally applied to only the top five executives of an affected bank. That will now be extended to the top 10 officials, and golden parachutes for the next 25 top officials will be limited to one year's pay.

Clawback rules that would require banking officials would have to return bonuses if found to have falsified reports. Those rules originally applied to a bank's top five executives, but under the rules detailed today that would be extended to the top 25 bank officials.

The public has been repeatedly infuriated by examples of federally subsidized bankers still spending lavishly on themselves while laying off tens of thousands of employees and of retirement nest eggs vaporized.

Obama called it "shameful" last week when it was reported that bankers had handed out $18.5 billion in bonuses at the end of 2008, despite the dreadful year of financial losses. The White House had to intervene to persuade Citigroup to abandon plans to buy a $50 million executive jet after getting its $45 billion boost. Merrill Lynch's former CEO John Thain had to be shamed into personally repaying the $1 million he spent on renovating his office while surviving on an additional $45 billion public loan. Bank of America partied hardy at the Super Bowl last weekend. And this week, Wells Fargo reluctantly canceled a corporate outing to Las Vegas.

GOP Emboldened By Obama Stumbles
The new rules should bring a cheer from a frustrated public, a sound that the Obama White House hasn't heard in a while. The withdrawal of two top appointees this week because they hadn't paid all their taxes even prompted the president to repeatedly apologize Tuesday for not adhering to the ethical standard he had publicly set for his administration.

"This was running the possibility of really hurting his reformist image," George Stephanopoulos, ABC News' chief Washington correspondent, told "Good Morning America" today.

The withdrawal of former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle was particularly damaging because Daschle was going to be the health and human services secretary and the point man on Obama's efforts to reshape the country's health-care system.

The stumbles could also embolden Republicans who are opposing large parts of the president's economic stimulus package.

"The president's going to have to agree to some changes right now," Stephanopoulos told "GMA."

Obama will meet today with Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Neb., and Maine's two Republican senators, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. The trio are spearheading a centrist group of Democrats and Republicans working to reshape the stimulus bill.

"There will still be differences with this group," Stephanopoulos said. "The president doesn't want to bring the package down as far as some of these senators want to go. But they're going to be working intensively on a compromise today."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Hey, FBI & SIGTARP: Can Corporations Be Money Mules, Too?

Not just your bank account could be fueling crime, but also your church, your investment broker, your 401K, any and all public & state pensions, and of course, federal pensions.

In Detroit I like to call this creature of stealin' the children, land & votes, or rather the Detroit Land Bank Authority.

Either way, stop funding crime, particularly the foreign invasion of our great nation.

Praise the lord.

But, if humans can be money mules, is there a possibility foreign corporations, functioning under fake ass Public Private Partnerships, like the Detroit Land Bank Authority, can, also, be placed in such a similarly constructed class based animus, too?

I officially decided today to be "Pick on SIGTARP" day, because there was a fleeting moment in House Judiciary Impeachment Hearings - Day 2 - where the powers of the U.S. Treasury accidentally, slipped from the tongues of the members, but that moment was quickly remedied when Matt Gaetz dropped Hunter Biden's crackpipe.

So many artifices, so many machinations of gerrymandering...

Your Bank Account Could Be Fueling Crime
Money Muling Is Illegal and Helps Criminals

Like many Americans, Aaron Cole and his wife had been able to save up a nest egg through the rising value of their home. But after six years there and the births of their two children, the Oregon couple decided to sell and use the equity they had built up to purchase a slightly larger place.

After they had sold their current home, Aaron Cole received word that his title company would be in touch soon with the wire instructions for sending the down payment required to close on the new house. When an email arrived on December 4, 2018, from what appeared to be the title company, Aaron's wife went to the bank and sent $122,850 to the account number provided in the message.

A few days later, the title company called to tell Aaron Cole it was time to wire over the down payment. Was he ready for the account information?

It took the representative from the title company just moments to figure out what had happened: The Coles had been the victims of a business email compromise scam and had wired their money to a criminal who had spoofed the title company’s email address and sent them fake wire instructions.

The family’s savings was gone. Their down payment had been funneled into one account and then broken up and sent to four other banks. Within days, the money would be on its way out of the country and into the control of those who carried out the scheme.

The Cole family had already sold their existing home with a move out deadline of December 23. Now, they couldn’t complete the sale of their new house, had little left in savings, and in a few weeks would have nowhere to call home.

“I’m never at a loss for words,” said Aaron Cole. “When this happened, I couldn’t come up with the words to tell my wife.”

What happened to the Coles was due to the deliberate actions of the online criminals who compromised an email account to steal from them, but the criminals could not have carried out the scheme without the involvement of money mules.

The FBI defines a money mule as a person who transfers illegally acquired money on behalf of or at the direction of another person. Money mules often receive a commission for the service or provide assistance because they believe they have a trusting or romantic relationship with the individual who is asking for help moving money.

“Mules are laundering money for people who have done some major damage. Who’s losing the money? It’s average people. It’s small companies.”
Yaqub Prowell, special agent, FBI Portland
Money mules may or may not be aware of the role they are playing in a crime, but the actions they take do serious harm to people like the Coles and millions of other innocent victims of online scams and frauds.

The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) received more than 20,000 complaints in 2018 from victims of business email compromise alone. These victims reported losses of more than $1.2 billion.

“Mules are laundering money for people who have done some major damage,” said FBI Special Agent Yaqub Prowell, who worked the Coles’ case through the FBI’s Portland Field Office. “Who’s losing the money? It’s average people. It’s small companies.”

Aaron Cole will be the first to tell you how devastating the loss was. “The equity in the house was our way to move forward,” he said of the theft. “I put myself back 15 years.”

In the Coles’ case, the title company generously helped the family cover their down payment in exchange for Aaron Cole’s help alerting others about business email compromise. The title company was seeing homeowners hit with this crime despite the warnings about fraud and account security they put on every document they send to clients.

Aaron Cole, like many people, skimmed right over those messages in the mass of paperwork that accompanies the process of buying and selling a home. Cole said, “I grew up with computers. I know not to click on anything suspicious. Nothing about this looked suspicious.”

The title company hopes that a human face and a very human story about what can happen will make more people aware of the crime and on guard against it.

Prowell, who spent days tracking the path the Coles’ money made from bank to bank, was successful in seizing some of the assets and saving about 30 percent of the funds the Coles lost. But those assets, because of the legal process involved, would not have made it back to the Coles fast enough to save their home. “The quickest forfeiture process I’ve seen has been about 12 months,” said Prowell.

He stressed that even though it was a good ending for the Cole family, the title company will absorb the rest of the losses. “This is a small title company,” Prowell said “But it was a small company with a heart.”

Prowell is also hopeful Aaron Cole’s story will raise awareness about business email compromise and the need to be vigilant about online security.

Cole said he used the same password for several email and social media accounts and hadn’t changed them for a while. The criminals could have been monitoring his accounts for years using a simple software that watches for keywords that may indicate money is about to move.

In addition to strong passwords and better awareness, Prowell says people should revert to old fashioned means of verification before sending money. “Go check in person,” he said. “Or pick up the phone and make a call.” 

But Prowell also wants those who act as money mules to understand the harm they are doing to others and the peril they are exposing themselves to. First and foremost, acting as a money mule is illegal. Those performing the function can face criminal prosecution, damage to their credit standing, and financial liability for the money they move.

Money Mule Awareness Booklet
People who agree to allow others to use their bank accounts or open new accounts for these purposes are also linking themselves to criminal organizations. One of the money muling groups involved in Aaron Cole’s case was part of a separate FBI investigation into financial and violent crimes. “These groups are not always just fraudsters,” Prowell said. “That particular group was also dangerous.” 

“If you send and receive money at someone else’s request—especially someone you’ve never met—you are likely helping criminals to steal from hardworking people, senior citizens, and small businesses,” said Supervisory Special Agent James Abbott of the FBI’s Money Laundering, Forfeiture, and Bank Fraud Unit.

During a recent eight-week campaign to combat money mules, the FBI partnered with other federal law enforcement agencies to interview more than 550 individuals. They served more than 500 warning letters on individuals who served as money mules for fraud schemes. The letters informed recipients that they could be prosecuted if they continue.

Additionally, more than 30 individuals were criminally charged, in part, for their roles in receiving victim payments and providing the fraud proceeds to accomplices. Abbott stressed that banks and law enforcement take note of unusual account activity: “Anyone who continues to participate in this type of activity should be prepared to hear from the FBI or our partners.”

Learn more about money mules and help raise awareness by sharing the facts through #DontBeAMule.

Signs You May Be Acting as a Money Mule

  • You receive an unsolicited email or contact over social media promising easy money for little to no effort.
  • The “employer” you communicate with uses web-based email (such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, or Outlook).
  • You are asked to open up a bank account in your own name or in the name of a company you form to receive and transfer money.
  • As an employee, you are asked to receive funds in your bank account and then “process funds” or “transfer funds” via a wire transfer, ACH, mail, or money service business (such as Western Union or MoneyGram).
  • You are allowed to keep a portion of the money you transfer.
  • Your duties have no specific job description.
  • Your online companion, whom you have never met in person, asks you to receive money and then forward the funds to an individual you do not know.
  • How to Protect Yourself
  • Do not accept any job offers that ask you to use your own bank account to transfer their money. A legitimate company will not ask you to do this.
  • Be wary when an employer asks you to form a company to open up a new bank account.
  • Never give your financial details to someone you don’t know and trust, especially if you met them online.
  • Be wary when job advertisements are poorly written with grammatical errors and spelling mistakes.
  • Be suspicious when the individual you met on a dating website wants to use your bank account for receiving and forwarding money.
  • Perform online searches to check the information from any solicitation emails and contacts.
  • Ask the employer, “Can you send a copy of the license/permit to conduct business in my county or state?”


How to Respond

  • If you have received solicitations of this type, do not respond to them and do not click on any links they contain. Inform your local police or the FBI.
  • If you believe that you are participating in a money mule scheme, stop transferring money immediately and notify your bank, the service you used to conduct the transaction, and law enforcement.

How to Protect Yourself Against Business Email Compromise
Improve account security: Create strong passphrases for all online accounts. Do not use the same passphrase for more than one account. Change passphrases frequently.

Verify email addresses: Carefully check the address of any message that contains a link, attachment, or instructions. Criminals will make small changes to email addresses to make them appear as if they have come from a trusted source.

Double check: Never make a purchase, send a payment, or make a financial transaction based on email instructions only. Follow up on such requests by checking in person if possible or making a phone call. Do not use the phone numbers provided in the email in question.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, September 12, 2019

The Tale Of Jamie & Sarah Raskin, Dan Kildee, TARP, Trafficking Tiny Humans & Detroit Land Bank Authority

Gather round, my Dearies, for the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed shall tell the tale of Jamie Raskin and why he was mean to my Sweetie.

Once upon a time, Jamie Raskin had a campaign event with Alexandrian Ocasio-Cortez.

I have never in my life experienced a Negro Spirituals political campaign troupe singing to the tune of Klezmer music, but there is always a first for everything.



Democracy Summer
https://democracysummerpac.com/
Anyway, Jamie has this PAC to support his campaigns and those of his fellow colleagues, called Democracy Summer.

It looks like a trafficking tiny humans operation.

Democracy Summer is a one-of-a-kind political Democratic Fellowship that teaches high school and college students the nuts-and-bolts of political organizing, the arts of electoral mobilization, the critical issues of the day, and the history of progressive political change. Our mission in 2019 is to deploy Democracy Summer Fellows to help Democratic candidates win key elections in swing districts, especially to take back Virginia's state legislature and help call voters in pivotal special elections like North Carolina's 9th U.S. House District.



On may 26, 2019, Democracy Summer was not in good standing with the State of Maryland, until today, September 12, 2019.




Noah Raskin, of unknown relation with Jamie, is the Chief Financial Officer of ASCD, is listed in the Articles of Incorporation for the Democracy Summer Leadership PAC, inc.
Noah Raskin
Noah Raskin brings more than 20 years of diversified experience in the higher education and commercial construction industries. 
Drawing on his unique experience  working in large organizations and successful start-ups, Raskin oversees financial services, human resources, project management, administrative services (facilities), meetings and travel services, and IT operations and engineering.
He is dedicated to building a strong foundation through high-level analytics and implementing an obtainable strategic plan that focuses on ASCD’s global mission.
Raskin provides strategic, tactical, financial, operational, and business development expertise in achieving short- and long-term organization goals. He has earned a strong record of reversing financial declines and capturing significant cost reductions through process redesign and performance enhancement.


Image result for Max Maccoby
Max Maccoby
Max Maccoby incorporated Democracy Summer Leadership PAC.

Max has previously represented David Brock.

David Brock has a history with CREW.

Max has a history defending False Claims actions in Medicare fraud and TARP.

Jamie's wife, Sarah Bloom Raskin just so happens to also have a background in TARP because she sat on the Board of Governors for the Federal Reserve when TARP was being laundered through the Treasury of the State of Michigan, through the Michigan Emergency Manager, to the Michigan State Housing and Development Authority, to the Michigan Land Bank Fast Track Authority, to the Detroit Land Bank Authority.

Sarah was there for the creation of the first Land Bank in the U.S., the Genesse County Land Bank Authority, which captured all the foreclosed homes in Flint during the Water Crisis, spearheaded by Dan Kildee.

Sarah should know Don McGahn and Neil Barofsky, too.





Sarah Bloom Raskin

  • Governor, Board of Governors, 2010–2014
Sarah Bloom Raskin took office as a member of the Board of Governors on October 4, 2010, to fill an unexpired term ending January 31, 2016.  She resigned on March 13, 2014.
Raskin received a bachelor’s degree in economics (magna cum laude) from Amherst College and earned a law degree from Harvard Law School.

During her career, Raskin has served both the public and private sectors. Early in her career, she worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Joint Economic Committee of the Congress. She was later managing director at the Promontory Financial Group. She also served as the banking counsel for the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

This is not Jamie & Sarah's daughter,
but I bet she 
"Butina-ed" him.
Before her appointment to the Board of Governors, Raskin was the commissioner of financial regulation for the State of Maryland. In this capacity, Raskin and her agency were responsible for regulating an array of interconnected financial institutions, including banks, credit unions, mortgage lenders, mortgage servicers, and trust companies, among others. Under her leadership, the commissioner’s office played an early and multifaceted role in the state’s response to the financial crisis. This included reforming through legislation; regulation; examination and supervision; the foreclosure process; combating foreclosure rescue and loan modification scams; and elevating licensing, lending, and servicing standards.

Raskin is married and has three teenage children.

Speaking of children, Max Maccoby has a trafficking tiny humans trust fund called "Friends of the Orphans", which is generating about $20,000,000 a year in grants and tax exempt contributions, as reported in 2017, where about $10,000,000 goes to compensation of its officers who probably end up contributing to Jamie's and his rogue ass crew's re-election campaigns for the purposes of procuring votes on Judiciary and other stuff.
https://www.nphusa.org/
NPH USA, formerly Friends of the Orphans, transforms the lives of vulnerable children in Latin America and the Caribbean by supporting the homes, health services and educational programs of Nuestros Pequeños Hermanos (NPH, Spanish for “Our Little Brothers and Sisters”).

Together, we help children overcome poverty and become leaders in their own communities. Founded in 1954, NPH is fully supporting nearly 3,100 boys and girls in Bolivia, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua and Peru. An additional 3,200 community children receive scholarships, meals, health care and other support. More than 114,000 services were provided through community outreach programs in 2018.


And the moral of the story is, "Do not be mean to my Sweetie. Period."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, October 26, 2018

Cocktails & Popcorn: OVERSIGHT Hearing On SIGTARP & Its Multifaceted Issues With The Administration Of The Hardest Hit Fund

My apologies for missing this precious gem!

The U. S. House Oversight Committee held hearings on the Hardest Hit Fund - TARP, to respond to the findings of SIGTARP, the enforcement mechanism of the U.S. Treasury which audits the program.

Sandy Baruah Sucks & Deserves A Subpoena For What He Did To Detroit


Basically, you have a bunch of "The Elected Ones" whose staff failed to properly debrief their members on the background of the Hardest Hit Fund.

All they had to do was google my name, but they probably did, realizing it was best to limit the breadth of their questioning to ethics in the administration of the program.

I like that, just let them speak.

What we have here is an issue within the U.S. Treasury because every time a Member asks about stealin', in an ethical sense, only, because there are no criminal referrals from the Treasury, that we know of, to date, due to the unverified ongoing investigation that may not even exist, here was the mimeographed response of Kipp Kranbuhl.

Chairman Gary Palmer smacked down Kipp (a name truly synonymous with poverty and hardship) down by having SIGTARP Christy Goldsmith Romero break it down to the fact that SIGTARP can not speak upon the multiple, ongoing criminal investigations that the office refuses to verify.

Gary: "Are gym memberships considered allowable to help homeowners stay in their homes?

Kipp: "We follow cost principles for every federal program."

Gary: "Have you made any criminal referrals?"

Kipp: "We follow cost principles for every federal program."

Gary: "What time is it?"

Kipp: "We follow cost principles for every federal program."

Christy was Johnnie on the Spot in her succinct responses to questions of why there was so much stealin', but I seriously wonder how many people in the room actually caught what she said.

For those who do not wish to watch the entire hearing, allow me to provide a quick synopsis.

"They were stealin'."

I bet Kipp wore Depends for this hearing.

I bet he thinks about me, alot

Neil Barofsky And His History Of SIGTARP


We have ourselves a Special Issue going on with Treasury.

See, SIGTARP, nor any other law enforcement entity, ever verifies the existence, or non-existence, of an investigation, or an ongoing investigation, unless it is verified by an original source, like me.

SIGTARP Is Still Investigating Flint & Detroit Blight Demolition Programs

But, hey, what do I know?

I know I am really happy that I found this hearing video!


Image result for us treasury

Statement of Deputy Assistant Secretary Kipp Kranbuhl Before the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Affairs and Government Operations

Chairman Meadows, Chairman Palmer, Ranking Member Connolly, Ranking Member Raskin, and Members of the Subcommittees, thank you for the opportunity to testify today about Treasury’s efforts to mitigate the effects of the financial crisis on American homeowners through the Housing Finance Agency Innovation Fund for Hardest Hit Housing Markets, also known as the Hardest Hit Fund or HHF.

In 2008, Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, 12 U.S.C. 5201, et seq., (as amended, EESA).  This legislation provided Treasury with immediate authorities and resources to restore liquidity and stability to the nation’s financial system in the wake of an historic economic crisis.  Using its authorities under EESA, Treasury established the Troubled Asset Relief Program, known as TARP, an initiative that was unprecedented in both its design and scale.  Congress initially authorized up to $700 billion for TARP programs, though Congress later reduced that authority to $475 billion.

In the following years, Treasury disbursed nearly $412 billion of TARP funds under a variety of programs designed to help stabilize banks, automobile manufacturers, and other institutions integral to the nation’s economy.  Treasury reserved additional funds for programs designed to protect home prices and prevent foreclosure.  The first, and largest, of these housing programs was the Making Home Affordable® program, or MHA.  Launched in 2009, MHA was a nationwide effort to help struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure by lowering mortgage payments to affordable levels.  However, it soon became clear that a one-size-fits-all approach would not be sufficient to address all of the specific needs of homeowners and communities in the states that were hit hardest by the housing crisis.

Treasury established HHF in 2010 as part of TARP in order to help prevent foreclosure and to stabilize housing markets in states hit hardest by the housing crisis.  State housing finance agencies, (together with certain designated entities, HFAs) in eighteen states and the District of Columbia were selected to participate, as these areas experienced unemployment rates at or above the national average, and/or home price declines of greater than 20 percent.[1]

Unlike MHA – a national program based on uniform criteria set by the Federal government – HHF was designed to give the participating HFAs the maximum flexibility to design and administer their own programs, each tailored to local conditions in their respective communities.  As a part of this flexibility, the states have been able to adapt their programs in order to address the changing needs of their communities over time.

As of December 31, 2017, states had assisted approximately 350,000 homeowners and funded the demolition and greening of nearly 24,000 blighted properties in distressed communities.
However, the flexibility afforded to HFAs by the Hardest Hit Fund has made Treasury’s oversight a critical aspect of the program.  Treasury maintains a strong commitment to ensure that the program achieves its goals and that federal taxpayer funds are used for their intended purpose.

Treasury requires each HFA to set specific goals for its HHF program, and to demonstrate steady progress toward meeting these goals.  Treasury works with each of the HFAs to identify and address barriers that would keep the HFA from achieving its goals.  Subject to Treasury approval, the HFAs may also modify their programs as needed in order to address the changing needs of their communities.  Treasury also maintains an ongoing dialogue with the HFAs through in-person meetings and regularly scheduled calls, and it hosts annual summits where the various participating HFAs can meet and share best practices.

Treasury has also conducted more than 100 on-site compliance reviews across the participating HFAs, as well as additional, targeted reviews to address specific programmatic risks.  These reviews evaluate a number of critical program functions, such as whether homeowners are evaluated in accordance with the HFA’s guidelines, program disbursements and administrative expenditures are appropriate, the information reported to Treasury is accurate, and the HFA’s internal controls are functioning as intended to minimize the risk of non-compliance.

Treasury takes corrective action when instances of non-compliance arise.  This includes, for example, requiring HFAs to re-evaluate homeowners that were improperly denied, to reimburse HHF for improper expenditures, and to strengthen internal controls in order to prevent further non-compliance.
In addition to compliance reviews, Treasury also takes SIGTARP’s role seriously.  We share this Committee’s and SIGTARP’s commitment to preventing fraud, waste, and abuse in all TARP programs, and we carefully consider recommendations in that regard.

Treasury responds to SIGTARP recommendations in writing, and our responses are made available to the public.  We work hard to address the concerns raised by these recommendations, in a manner that allows the programs to function as intended and in the context of TARP’s wind-down.  With respect to HHF in particular, this has included, for example, issuing written guidance to clarify HFA obligations, recovering funds that were improperly spent, and requiring states to strengthen internal controls to prevent non-compliance in the future.

For example, Treasury thoroughly reviewed the $2.2 million of costs questioned in SIGTARP’s August 2017 Audit Report.  This involved analyzing thousands of individual transactions incurred by all 19 HFAs, dating back to the program’s inception in 2010.  Following this review, Treasury determined that $656,141 of the questioned costs did not comply with the Federal government’s cost principles.  The HFAs were required to reimburse HHF.  For the reasons set forth in our April 6, 2018, letter to SIGTARP—a copy of which has been provided to the Committee and is available on our website—Treasury determined that the remaining costs questioned by SIGTARP were allowable under Federal cost principles.

As is the case with all TARP programs, HHF is winding down.  Although Congress authorized additional funding in 2015, the program remains a temporary one.  As of the end of April 2018, Treasury has disbursed $8.8 billion (or 92 percent) of the $9.6 billion obligated under HHF. Although HFAs may continue issuing new approvals through December 31, 2020, most of the states have already begun to close down HHF programs or will do so this year as they exhaust their available funds.  This includes California and Florida, the two largest states in the program.

Treasury’s outstanding commitments under TARP represent just one percent of the $475 billion authorized by Congress.  As TARP winds down, Treasury remains committed to robust oversight and monitoring of all of its TARP programs, including HHF.

As part of this wind down, the Office of Financial Stability, which oversees HHF and other TARP programs, was recently realigned to report to Treasury’s Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions.  This realignment will enable our office to oversee an orderly and successful wind down of HHF that is in line with the wind down of other programs that are also overseen by this office, such as the State Small Business Credit Initiative and the Small Business Lending Fund.

I thank you again for the opportunity to testify today and welcome your questions.
####

[1] The eighteen participating states consist of Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Tennessee.

Here is where the Treasury came up with the excuse, "the money has not yet been allocated" whenever SIGTARP asked what happened to the money.

As soon as Treasury responds, by the wings of Mercury, they officially start stealin' because they know by the time they are asked again, there will be a new allocation cycle, with questions only focused on these new allotted funds, not the funds they were stealin' in the previous grant spend down cycle, because that could be one of those double jeopardy administrative moments they can argue their way out of a criminal proceeding.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©