Showing posts with label CIVITAS Solutions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CIVITAS Solutions. Show all posts

Friday, December 27, 2019

Trump & Duterte To End The Philippines Trafficking Tiny Humans & Pelosi's Stealin'

Banning Dick Durbin & Patrick Leahy from entering the Philippines?

Demanding VISAs to enter the country?

Well, that sounds like Trump & Duterte are going to end the trafficking of tiny humans, but, hey, what do I know?

I know it started at Nancy's house.

Nancy Pelosi & Philippines Overthrow: It All Started At Nancy's House

This is about stealin' the children, land & vote.
http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=philippines#axzz69M1foh9P


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

How To Steal A Civil Rights Legacy, The Child Welfare Propaganda Way

Ok, boys and girls, The Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed is going to introduce, what is believed to be the most prominent pirateering, co-optimization, highjacked, or just a classic example of stealin'.

This is the image that stopped me in my tracks.


This is the original

Image result for i am a man

This is textbook material.

And there was not one mention of the Child Welfare System, the residual of the peculiar institution, or what I prefer to call the Trafficking of Tiny Humans, because, after all, as told to me by Amnesty International regional group, "foster care and adoption are not on our agenda."

And Amnesty International made no mention of what the plan was behind dropping the visual context of an issue of civil rights that does not exist.

Children have no civil rights because they are chattel, property, and in the situation of alien minors, they fall under the state through the legal mechanisms of an eminent legal domain, which has only been defined under international property laws in asset management.

Neither was there a mention of the meaning or history behind "I Am A Man".

And there was no mention of Detroit, where the movement came together and took force, where we have the highest rates of infant mortality, child poverty, child trafficking, foster care, adoption, illiteracy, and many of the others who are undocumented alien children who are not captured in this pirateering of the civil rights legacy, because it does not conform to the  objectives of the propaganda being spouted.

And there was no mention of John Conyers, Jr.

The 1997 settlement came out to be called the Adoption Safe Families Act because States become the legal guardians of these alien children, where, in turn, the States privatize the guardianship as a service of corporate parenting.


Simple rules of epidemiology, when trying to cure a problem, look and find out how it came to be a problem, where, in this instance, would be the history of child welfare in this nation.


No one wants to talk about the many forms of trafficking tiny humans because the epidemiological model all began in the construction of the peculiar institution.

And that, my dearies, is another tale on how to identify the stealin' of a civil rights legacy and the use of propaganda to cover it up.

 Defense of immigrant kids in detention relies on '80s court case

Aug. 2 (UPI) -- The Trump administration's immigration policies have brought an old court case back to life in defense of immigrant children at the border, often referred to as "the Flores settlement."he case, which was filed in 1985 and settled in 1997, set the rules that the government must follow when it keeps migrant children in its custody. The latest court order based on the settlement took place on Monday, in which a judge barred immigration authorities from giving children psychotropic drugs without consent of parents or legal guardians.

I have to set the record straight and expound upon the "consent of parents or legal guardians" when it comes to the use of psychotropic medication on kids in state care.  The state is the parent.  The state is the guardian.  The used to farm out its guardianship to a designated superintdent, or "governess" over the wards, but now, since it is all privatized, the legal guardians are the corporations, like CIVITAS or Samaritas.

The Trump administration has requested to amend the settlement to allow it to indefinitely detain migrant children. So far, the courts have denied these requests, and will continue to monitor the detention of migrant children.

So what was the Flores case about?

Case took years

In the 1980s, the Reagan administration aggressively used detention of Central Americans as a device to deter migration from Central America, where violent civil wars had caused tens of thousands to flee. As a result, the government held in custody Central Americans arrested at the U.S.-Mexico border, including many who sought asylum in the United States because they feared persecution if returned home. Immigrant rights groups filed a series of lawsuits challenging various aspects of the detention policies, including denying access of migrants to counsel, taking steps to encourage them to "consent" to deportation, and detaining them in isolated locations far from families and attorneys.

One suit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union in 1985 on behalf of Jenny Lisette Flores, a 15-year-old from El Salvador. She had fled violence in her home country to live with an aunt who was in the United States. But Flores was detained by federal authorities at the U.S. border for being undocumented.

The ACLU charged that holding Flores indefinitely violated the U.S. Constitution and the immigration laws. The Flores case made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In its 1993 ruling in the case, the court held that a regulation allowing the government to release a migrant child to a close family member or legal guardian in the United States was legal.

But the primary legacy of the case was the subsequent settlement, to which both the Clinton administration and the plaintiffs agreed in 1997.

The Flores settlement established standards for the treatment of unaccompanied minors who were in the custody of federal authorities for violating the immigration laws. It requires the federal government to place children with a close relative or family friend "without unnecessary delay," rather than detaining them; and to keep immigrant children who are in custody in the "least restrictive conditions" possible. Generally speaking, this has meant migrant children can only be kept in federal immigrant detention for 20 days.

The ConversationThe Flores settlement created a framework agreed to by the U.S. government that addressed how migrant children were to be treated if they were detained. It is a landmark settlement in no small part because Central Americans continue to flee violence in their homelands and the U.S. government has responded with mass detention of immigrant children. Although the Flores settlement was agreeable to the Clinton administration, the Trump administration wants to detain families, including children, for periods longer than permitted by the Flores settlement.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, July 31, 2018

DEFANGO Reports On More Propaganda Predictive Modeling Crap He Found

Always remember, it all started in child welfare.

Predictive Modeling Began In Child Welfare




Yes, these people believe they can predict child abuse and neglect.

“Giving every child a chance to reach their full potential is the best work anyone can do.”

— Hillary Clinton

Yes, these people believe they can predict, or rather, optimize profitability of its human capital by "investing in the best interests of the child", or more intuitively understood, predicting who will or will not be going to university, who will become housekeepers, who will have their children removed and placed under the legal guardianship of a parent corporation....oh, I believe you get the "reach their full potential" picture.

Enjoy, I did.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, June 30, 2018

Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Legislative Promulgation Of The Privatization In Trafficking Tiny Humans - 2017

The following video is from the 2017 Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Annual Legislative Conference.

I used to go but it gets tiresome after a while when being constantly snubbed.

The term "Braintrust" was originally created as the Judiciary Braintrust, so it seems, oddly enough, that it was highjacked, in a tale I shall tell at a later time.

This "Braintrust" was spearheaded by Sheila Jackson Lee, who has quite the surreptitious background in dealing with child welfare fraud, which I tell at a later time, because I wish to savor the moment, very slowly, when I do tell the tale.

The focus of the "Braintrust" was about privatization of child welfare, where one of the speakers was from MENTOR, which is under investigation.



So, in essence, this Braintrust is allowing leaders of child welfare organizations that are currently being investigated for trafficking tiny humans, which includes multiple forms of frauds, to promulgate national child welfare policy, by promoting the failed model of the residual of the peculiar institution, for the sole purposes of making more money for stealin'.

CIVITAS Solutions: Human Trafficking Listed On NYSE



These advocates for privatization, doing the bidding of their task masters, are regurgitating corrupt data, based upon a two year reporting delay, that is so incomplete, it does not include the trafficking of children.

These speakers have no qualms, whatsoever, in announcing that they are in Public Private Partnerships with their NGOs.

Theses brown paper bag test social policy platforms only further the reinforce the iron curtain of the fraudulent privatization of the child welfare system.

They never even whispered the words"
  • child trafficking;
  • fraud;
  • rape;
  • lab rats;
  • campaign finance;
  • pedophilia;
  • poverty policies.
There are more than 3,000,000 children and youth in the U.S. child welfare system, that are reported.

The numbers of missing children should be twice that amount because selling chattel is the oldest form of survival,  and there are no reliable data on alien immigrant children being trafficked, which is now through privatization.

Slavery never ended.  

It was just renamed child welfare.

The Second Chance Reauthorization Act is nothing more than another Public Private Partnership complex financial fraud scam of more need for out-dated research, using broken down, raggedy-ass, exclusively marginalized, targeted population, qualitative variables, for the purposes of pumping more money into NGOs that will continue to keep these child welfare policy experts, "Dumb, Fat & Happy" so Sheila, and her rogue ass crew can maintain their freedom, for just a little bit longer.

"Fat, Dumb & Happy" and have no clue as to what the Emoluments Clause means to them.

Learn more: BEVERLY TRAN: "The Fat, Dumb & Happy Network": When Ghetto-Fab Goes Horribly Wrong In Unions http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2018/03/the-fat-dumb-happy-network-when-ghetto.html#ixzz5JwyYNjMp
Stop Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare 

Increase Funding for the Second Chance Act (SCA)

Urge your Members of Congress, especially those serving on the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, to support increased funding for Second Chance Act programs in the annual appropriations process. The bipartisan Second Chance Act provides resources to states, local governments and nonprofit organizations to improve outcomes for people returning to communities from prisons, jails and juvenile facilities.

BACKGROUND:

Enacted in 2008, the Second Chance Act (P.L. 110-199) authorizes federal grants that assist states, counties and nonprofit organizations in developing and implementing programs to help formerly incarcerated individuals successfully reintegrate into the community after their release from correctional facilities. Administered through the Office of Justice Programs at the U.S. Department of Justice, Second Chance Act programs have helped numerous counties provide reentry services – like employment assistance, substance abuse and mental health treatment, housing, family-center programming and mentoring – to adults and juveniles returning to the community from prisons or jails.

Since its establishment in 2008, the Second Chance Act has funded more than 600 grants to state and local governments and nonprofit organizations, and more than a third of these grants have been awarded to counties. These investments in reentry programs have proven effective in helping individuals successfully reintegrate into their communities. Successful reintegration results in lower rates of recidivism, which improves public safety and provides significant savings to counties, who collectively spend $70 billion each year on criminal justice.

As Congress considers funding for a variety of federal programs and thousands of formerly incarcerated individuals return to their communities, the Second Chance Act should be prioritized in the annual appropriations process. Currently, the program is funded at $68 million under FY 2017 appropriations.

NACo supports an increase in funding for this pivotal program to at least the FY 2010 enacted level of $100 million in future annual appropriations processes. NACo members are encouraged to contact their members of Congress, and especially those on the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, to support this level of funding for the program in the FY 2018 appropriations process.

KEY TALKING POINTS:

  • Counties spend more than $70 billion each year on criminal justice and more than $69 billion on health and human services.
  • According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, there are more than 11 million individuals admitted to jails each year. Of that number, only about four percent of jail admissions result in prison sentences – in other words, 96 percent of jail detainees and inmates return directly to the community from jail.
  • The Second Chance Act improves the coordination of reentry services and policies at the state, local and tribal levels, and provides financial assistance for local programs that provide employment training, mentoring, substance abuse and mental health treatment and other family-centered services to formerly incarcerated individuals.
  • Since 2009, more than one out of three Second Chance Act awards has gone to county governments. Of the nearly $300 million that has been awarded to state, local, tribal and nonprofit reentry programs under the Second Chance Act, $95 million has gone directly to county governments.
  • The Second Chance Act is currently authorized and funded at $68 million under FY 2017 appropriations. Funding for the program should be increased to the FY 2010 level of $100 million in future appropriations bills.
Sheila was mean to my Sweetie.  That is not a good thing, at all.

Office of Congressional Ethics Investigation of Representative Sheila Jackson Lee Review No 15-7713 Referra... by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, June 22, 2018

More Concerns In Privatization In Foster Care

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to hold hearings on the privatization of foster care.

MENTOR is a publicly traded company, just so you know.

Does Privatized Foster Care Put Kids at Risk?

The number of kids in foster care is climbing, and so are public costs. In search of efficiencies, many states have at least partially privatized their systems.

In 2012, when Alexandria Hill was a year old, Texas’s child welfare agency found her parents unfit to care for her. The baby’s biological mother was prone to seizures, officials said, and both parents were using marijuana. So the state authorized a for-profit company, The MENTOR Network, to locate foster parents.

The first family MENTOR placed Alexandria with neglected her; when her biological parents complained after finding her filthy at a supervised visit, the company moved her to another home—that of a 53-year-old woman named Sherill Small. Less than a year later, Small killed Alexandria. She told police she’d been frustrated with the girl and swung her until her head crashed into the floor.

Buzzfeed’s harrowing 2015 investigation into MENTOR exposed the grim repercussions of privatized foster care, detailing Alexandria’s and others’ tragic cases that likely resulted from shortcuts made in the pursuit of profit. Piling too many cases on social workers, for instance, can result in abuse when foster parents aren’t properly vetted or monitored. Among the omissions in Alexandria’s case: MENTOR failed to interview Small’s sisters, who said they would have warned the company about her. (MENTOR denied that it cuts corners to make money.)

The lessons of such an investigation are perhaps even more important today, as more children are entering foster care because of the impact of the widening opioid crisis. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration on Children and Families, the number of children in foster care rose almost 7 percentfrom 2013 to 2015, nearing 430,000. In 32 percent of all foster placements parental substance abuse was cited as a factor—an increase of 10 percent compared to 2005.

When a state privatizes foster care, it uses federal, state, and local funds to contract out services, such as locating and monitoring foster parents, to private agencies. In most cases, public agencies still manage children’s long-term outcomes, such as reunification or adoption—but more jurisdictions are shifting even that responsibility to the private sector.

These private agencies are usually nonprofit, making MENTOR, as a for-profit corporation, an extreme example of privatization. Yet nonprofits can subcontract their work to for-profit companies; in states that forbid for-profit entities from administering foster care, MENTOR used this loophole as a workaround. And even in more straightforward nonprofit arrangements, privatization has negatively impacted children.

Over the past three decades, many states have privatized at least part of their foster care systems; some, like Kansas and Florida, have privatized theirs completely. Despite high-profile cases like Alexandria’s—which helped prompt a 2015 Senate Finance Committee investigation that resulted in proposed legislation to strengthen government oversight of foster care—some states and officials continue to see privatization as an antidote to a bloated and inefficient public sector. Kentucky, for instance, recently pledged to investigate whether it should fully privatize its foster care system; private agencies currently provide services for around half of the children in the state’s care. In Texas, a pilot program that privatizes the monitoring of homes identified as at risk for child abuse or neglect is moving forward, despite some lawmakers’ concerns. Proponents of privatization often claim that private entities are more efficient than government agencies, and calls for the privatization of foster care have been no different. Yet Tracey Feild, director of the Child Welfare Strategy Group at the Annie E. Casey Foundation, questions that idea. Private agencies, she said, have “certainly not done the work for a lower cost.”

Feild, whose Child Welfare Strategy Group provides consulting to child welfare agencies, said that the private sector has in fact brought more resources to the foster care system through, for example, successfully lobbying politicians for funds. Though this might be a positive development, she said the argument can also be made that if those additional resources had gone to the public sector to begin with, it could have solved the problems that spurred calls for privatization. For instance, new resources could be used for services such as more and better substance abuse treatment to keep families intact rather than rely on foster care.

And while public agencies still conduct the initial investigations into abuse or neglect, once a system is privatized legislators often assume they no longer need to give them money. This leaves the public agencies chronically underfunded, making it difficult to monitor their private contractors. “A public agency can be handing out tens of millions of dollars to private providers with very little oversight,” said Feild.

Private agencies can be effective in providing foster care services, Feild says. But they often face a steep learning curve. “If you’ve got the patience and good providers, you can make a go of privatization,” she said. “But it’s not going to take two to three years to improve outcomes. It’s more like 10 years.” Kansas’ privatized system, for example, is quite strong, she noted, as it’s been in operation for over 20 years. (Still, the state is struggling to keep up with cases due to the opioid epidemic and funding cuts.)

In less established systems, the private agencies can get overwhelmed with their new responsibilities—and kids can suffer, languishing in foster care or shelters. “Child welfare workers get crisis focused; they’re worried about getting a child a bed for that night,” said Feild. “So the initial priority for the new privatization provider isn’t the child who may be able to return to his family because the provider has been doing work with the parents. It’s who is coming through the provider’s front door, which results in kids staying longer than necessary.”

Jessalyn Schwartz, a Boston attorney focusing on child welfare and mental health law, added that in these circumstances children are usually placed in what is available rather than what is needed. “And they often don’t get much say in where they end up or how often they move,” she said. “Though privatized foster care is often labeled as a corrective, it’s imperative to better understand it before declaring it as such.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, June 10, 2018

The Tale Of The Death Of Kate Spade: Social Impact Bonds, CIVITAS, Child Welfare Fraud, Clinton Foundation, Land Banks & Haiti


Gather round, my dearies for the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed shall unravel the tale of the Death of Kate Spade.

The death of Kate Spade is tragic, yet there are stories abound circulating through social media as to the details behind her demise.

Medical Examiner Says Kate Spade’s Death Was a Suicide

There are also narratives that have been conjured up from those desperate for the truth.

Kate Spade’s husband emerges in bizarre mouse mask 

Then, there is what I see.

Kate had a child welfare foundation, operating through the Clinton Foundation, that, I shall call a socioeconomic human subject policy research and design operation, utilizing public funds to operate a corporation, through Social Impact Bonds.



https://www.rescue.org/airbel-center
Kate Spade & Company Foundation was involved in the trafficking of tiny humans.

https://www.rescue.org/article/earthquake-haiti

The Airbel Center's mission is to design and test life-changing, scalable solutions for people affected by crisis. By bringing together field staff, designers, strategists, researchers and technical experts, we aim to uncover and nurture ideas that make a big impact on people’s safety, health, education, income and power.

Kate Spade was involved in the destruction of Haiti through her philanthropic activities of supporting these socioeconomic pilot test models like microfinancing, land banks, trafficking tiny humans.

There is much more to the story of Kate Spade, or rather Kate Spade & Company Foundation because what I see is a strong possibility that her assets may have been noticed to be seized.

The Foundation had, in 2016, almost $16 million in Vanguard Investments and I am going to speculate that it was in asset management dealing with land, and I am even going to go out there a tad bit more, only because I do not possess access to the databases I really want to access, and just throw it out there that I bet there were some birth certificates involved in dealing with CIVITAS Solutions.

Why Nobody Is Investigating Children Who Die In Foster Care

 U.S. Senate Finance Committee Study On Privatization In Foster Care

Nancy Pelosi & Philippines Overthrow: It All Started At Nancy's House



Kate Spade & Company Foundation shall now be preserved in the annals of history for being one of the first to use a child welfare research and design human test subjects to implement the structural foundations of Social Impact Bonds through Public Private Partnerships.

The Clinton Foundation used the Kate Spade & Company Foundation for asset management.

We say asset management now-a-days because the term human trafficking is so gauche.

I look forward to the Senate Hearings, because, indirectly, of course, she was mean to my Sweetie.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Nancy Pelosi & Philippines Overthrow: It All Started At Nancy's House

It all started at Nancy's house.

Once upon a time Nancy Pelosi was mean to my Sweetie, and it really bothered me because I did not know exactly why.

Then, one day, I was magically sent to her house by a little cyber mermaid who had returned from a deep dive and found there were no property tax records. 

It seems she had her properties set up to be put into the family trust, which means they probably have warranty deeds and filed a land patent so she does not have to pay property taxes.

2012  J573584-00 12/28/2012 K802 0923 Deed of Trust R Paul Pelosi Family Trust, financed through Union Bank NA, which just so happens to be behind the Land Bank of the the Philippines.

These trust funds get TARP money and are registered as foreign entities.

It was at that moment, the stench of the Detroit Land Bank Authority began to permeate. which led me here, the San Francisco Land Bank:
5243 Mission St · San Francisco, CA

The San Fransico Land Bank is registered as the Philippines Land Bank:

Home
https://www.landbank.com/

They set up the same predatory privatization model in Haiti.

They set up the same predatory privatization model in Detroit.

They are all the same people.

https://www.landbank.com/about
Over the years, LANDBANK has successfully managed this tough balancing act as evidenced by the continued expansion of its loan portfolio in favor of its priority sectors: the small farmers and fishers, a good part of which are agrarian reform beneficiaries; micro and SMEs; agri- and aqua-projects of local government units and government-owned and controlled corporations; communications, transportation, housing, education, health care, environment-related projects, tourism, and utilities.
Then I quickly discovered how they were laundering money out the country.

They privatized administrative banking services, just like they did with human services in Michigan under Engler, just like they did in Russia.

The government owns the corporations because the corporations own the politicians, who in turn make the law to make the policy for them to what they want: privatize..

This is the predatory lending model for profiting off poverty, or rather another model for the new human trafficking, all neatly packaged into pretty databases in BANCNET.

You can now withdraw your money anywhere in the world through your cyber accounts, under the structure of whatever this concept of a land bank is operating as.

LANDBANK is regulated by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas.
Copyright © 2014 Land Bank of the Philippines. All Rights Reserved.


This is how they were laundering the money
Section 10 relates to the “Freezing of Monetary Instrument” wherein upon verified “ex parte” petition by the AMLC, the Court of Appeals (CA) should act on the petition to freeze within twenty-four (24) hours from filing of the petition, and the freeze order shall be for a period of twenty (20) days unless extended by the Court/CA.
TRANSLATION:  A land bank does not fall under traditional financial banking institutions, which means they made it up all the rules themselves, without any input from the public, because it is a private institution.

This is one of those slave labor programs set up to replace social welfare assistance because it provides free labor for the corporations whose child welfare NGO privately funded through social impact bonds are the ones who profit by billing the national trust fund, the treasury in performance standards, put in place through their own NGO think tanks and universities.

Moreover, the Program was able to forge a partnership with the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) under its “Cash for Work and Livelihood Assistance Program” that provided farmers with an initial grant to set-up a mini-farm. For its part, the Department of Agriculture (DA) provided free seedlings and much needed farm equipment.

This is a social impact bond program where "The Poors" (still said with clinched teeth) are nothing but "Works For Hire", packaged as a sexy, neofuedal policy of serfdom.

If a corporation can privately contract with State entities to grant legal custody and guardianship to its chattel, as in the reference to child welfare services where the child becomes under the aegis of the state, with guardianship being granted to private corporations like GALs and CIVITAS, then, under the exact same principle, these tiny humans, in essence, become copyright individuals granted legal guardianship of the NGO, owned by the land patent.

The child is an immoveable chattel, but the birth certificate, the ownership, will always be moveable, for leveraging as a financial instrument as a repurposed allodial title, as a land patent.

The trust funds, being the children's identities are now accessible for leveraging mortgages to buy land, and as such, have developed an entire, fully, ready-to-go-to, transposable model to take out a government by stealin' through law and policy.

Remember, before you are a man, you are a child, and now they own you at birth, of which they are now doing predictive modeling to forecast "the best interests of the child", literally.

Remember this?



I wonder just how many of those stolen children's identities who are now all grown up are being used as fake employees in federal government, to take out fake mortgages, make fake contributions to strawman child welfare NGOs functioning as a front for trafficking tiny humans of "The Poors", (always said with clinched teeth).

I wonder just how vast this operation of snatching identities and assets of those who hail from "vulnerable" or "targeted" populations, being determined by the state to be in need of corporate guardianship, for other purposes, like laundering fake campaign contributions through FEC campaign finance reporting.

Just on a side note, I thought it was interesting that "Pelosi's Meanies are running Air BnB operations in San Francisco and Haiti.

I truly hope there are no undercover trafficking tiny human operations associations going on with these Land Bank supported ventures in the Philippines, or San Francisco, for that matter.
And I truly hope none of the Land Bank of the Philippines operations are fueled through TARP.

Either way it goes, it all started at Nancy's house, and this is hardly close to even being finished.

Stay tuned.

‘The Goldberg plan’ to oust Duterte


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

U.S. Senate Finance Committee Study On Privatization In Foster Care

To begin, I extend my humblest gratitude for the extensive work of the staffers of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee in embracing the magnitude of the pervasive issues surrounding the profit component in the privatization in foster care.

I am deeply moved that this Committee came to an agreement to allow this exhaustive, well, somewhat exhaustive, study to be executed.

Now, for my 2 cents.

Of course, the study just had to be diplomatic, but that is expected.

I do not have to be professional as I am an original source.

Even though there was no mention of fraud, the venue is the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, which is proper, but, where is the Medicaid fraud?

I know this is only a start, so we are going to be working together for a very long time because there were 18 very naughty States which did not respond to the Committee's inquiries.

"Not all of the States responded to inquiries from the Committee. » Seventeen States failed to respond to the 50-State Letter. Those States were:
  1. Arizona, 
  2. Florida, 
  3. Georgia, 
  4. Idaho, 
  5. Louisiana, 
  6. Maine, 
  7. Michigan, 
  8. Mississippi, 
  9. Missouri, 
  10. Montana, 
  11. Nevada, 
  12. North Carolina, 
  13. Ohio, 
  14. Rhode Island, 
  15. South Carolina, 
  16. Vermont, and 
  17. Virginia.
» Massachusetts failed to respond to the 5-State In-Depth Letter. Despite repeated assurances from the Massachusetts Department of Children and Family Services that ‘‘continuing efforts are being made to collect and prepare the information’’ with ‘‘the full intention to send a response to the Committee,’’ a response to the Committee’s questions was never received."

Why did this States not respond to the inquiry of privatization in foster care?

Fraud.

Michigan was the first state to privatize.

Now, that the ball is in my court, I shall be publishing my book, the first in a series, quite soon.



Oh, this is going to be so much fun to take these people out because they fund political campaigns and invest in many other ventures besides property.

CIVITAS Solutions: Human Trafficking Listed On NYSE


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Why Nobody Is Investigating Children Who Die In Foster Care

Want to know why nobody is investigating children who die in foster care?

It is the same reasosn nobody is investigating the rapes, tortures, human trafficking and billions and billions in fraud.

As for Senator Burr not supporting the Families First, even though I have my own reservations, counter to his, it is strictly an issue of money.

Ethics Should Ask Senator Richard Burr Why He Withheld His Vote For Foster Care Reform

Privatization does not afford civil rights, which is another reason why nobody is investigating children who die in foster care.

Then, there is the fact that this privatized state contracted corporation is listed on the NYSE.

CIVITAS Solutions: Human Trafficking Listed On NYSE

In short, nobody cares because there is just too much money to be funneled into political campaigns, and invested in social impact bonds.



Children are Dying at Alarming Rates in Foster Care, and Nobody is Bothering to Investigate

CHILDREN IN THE for-profit foster care system are dying at alarming rates, but the deaths are not being investigated, and autopsies are not even being attached to the now-closed case files, a two-year investigation has found. The investigation, conducted and released in rare bipartisan fashion by the Senate Finance Committee, looked closely at one of the largest private providers of foster care services, the MENTOR Network.

 The companies and agencies charged with keeping foster children safe often failed to provide the most basic protections or take steps to prevent tragedies, the investigation found.

 In the wake of the report, shares of the MENTOR Network’s parent company, Civitas Solutions, traded sharply downward, but quickly rebounded amid a lack of press coverage. Google

By pushing the report to colleagues, Sen. Ron Wyden, the committee’s top-ranking Democratic member, said he and panel chair Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, are trying to “light a big fire around” how important it is to fix the child welfare system’s flaws.

 The report was prompted in part by a BuzzFeed investigation into the company two years ago.

The committee found that 86 children had died in the company’s care over a 10-year period, and the firm had conducted internal investigations in only 13 cases.

 The political problem for foster children is a structural one.

It would be hard to think of a group with less lobbying power in Washington, D.C., while the group homes that warehouse children are making significant profits off each one and are loathe to see that income dry up.

Late last year, Hatch and Wyden made a push to reform the system with a bill that would privilege family settings over group homes, but a Baptist group home network in North Carolina persuaded its Senate delegation to block the legislation.

 Meanwhile, state agencies and judges tend to be quick to pull a child from their home at the first sign of trouble, reasoning that the safest move is to act rather than leave them with a parent.

If tragedy strikes while a child is at home, media attention condemns the parents and the system that left the child there.

But when tragedy strikes a child who was hastily moved into a group home, the death often passes unnoticed.

 The failure of the child welfare system is a “real moral blot on the country,” Wyden said, and children “aren’t going to have an army of lobbyists behind them,” so it’s up to lawmakers to show how serious the failures of the system are.

Wyden said he hopes this report shocks opponents of the Families First bill into taking a second look.
Roughly 1,600 children die each year due to abuse and neglect, the committee reported. “Members of Congress don’t get up in the morning and say, ‘Hey, I’m going to spend my whole day being rotten to kids,’” Wyden told The Intercept after the release of the report.

“I just don’t think they have a sense of the enormity of the problem and the vulnerability of the kids and the families and how broken the system is, so what we’re trying to do is get this in front of them so that with all of the other issues that are coming at them, they’ll say, ‘You know, it’s a bipartisan effort, there’s two approaches on this, let’s get going.’”

 The investigation found that MENTOR did not investigate fatalities; the vast majority of children who died were not the subject of internal investigations even when the death was unexpected, and pending autopsy reports were excluded from files.

 ‘‘The MENTOR Network serves significantly more children and youth with heightened risk factors relative to others in foster care, and sustains child mortality rates that are comparable with national norms,” the company told the committee.

 The panel, however, dubbed that claim “false,” noting its death rate among foster children was found to be 42 percent higher than the national average.

 “The gaps in the system are so enormous that, according to the advocates who care and are trying to do a good job, there isn’t even a way to track the extent of the mistreatment of the kids,” Wyden said.

“The inquiry dug deeply into the MENTOR Network, and I don’t think anybody can look away when you find in a 10-year period, 70 percent of the kids who died in MENTOR’s care and custody, died unexpectedly.”

 The investigation was conducted by requesting information from all 50 states; 17 didn’t bother to submit anything.

“It’s kind of like some of these managers in states just consider protecting the children an afterthought, not a priority,” Wyden said.

 The report cited news accounts of children placed in homes with individuals who had been convicted of kidnapping and other serious crimes, with parents who had substance abuse problems, and in homes where caretakers had previously “failed” foster care placements.

 “This isn’t an abstraction,” Wyden said. “This is about denying the most vulnerable kids in America the chance to have healthy and productive lives.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, August 5, 2017

CIVITAS Solutions: Human Trafficking Listed On NYSE

I have stated over and over again that children are still chattel, with attachment to trust funds of Social Security and land.

Profits from foster care and adoption are so good, CIVITAS Solutions, Inc. has gone public, on the New York Stock Exchange, that is.

This is privatization, where there are no opportunity for FOIA or civil rights, as it is a private corporation with its own belief system.

A private corporation does not have to honor Generally Accepted Accounting Practices, which means it engages in Medicaid fraud.
Second quarter net revenue of $362.4 million was a 4.8% increase over the same quarter last year.


These are the faces that are trafficking tiny humans by profiting from Medicaid and no one has a problem with this because they fund political campaigns.

Why am I the only person who sees a problem with private corporations becoming the legal guardians of children who have been removed from the home by CPS to be placed into foster care and adopted out for being poor, by using Medicaid funds, intended for these children and the families, as alternative investment opportunities on Wall Street?

Once a child is under the legal aegis of a private corporation, the private corporation has access and control of all Social Security Trust Accounts of that child, and can use the child as chattel to leverage mortgages.

I guess privatized human trafficking is now in competition with the NGOs of the tax exempt God.

National Mentor Holdings has an IPO prepared by Vestar Capital Partners for $1 billion.

Barclays Capital Inc., BofA Merrill Lynch and UBS Securities LLC are serving as representatives of the underwriters and joint book-running managers for the offering. Raymond James & Associates, Inc., SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp. and Avondale Partners, LLC are acting as co-managers.
Not one penny will go back into the Social Security Trust Fund, and, more than likely, the money will be used for national and international real estate ventures and investment ventures to profit from the spoils of war, like trafficking more children through a global expansion of its "mentoring" programs, and its intellectual property ownership of humans.

The banks now own humans and they started with the child.

Board Members Of Troubled Foster-Care Company Have Little To Say About Abuses


A recent BuzzFeed News investigation into the nation’s largest for-profit foster care company revealed deaths, sex abuse, and serious lapses in the training and oversight of foster parents.

The investigation into National Mentor Holdings found instances of long-term sex abuse in Maryland by Mentor foster fathers, widespread problems with Mentor documented by the state of Texas, and at least six deaths of children in the custody of Mentor since 2005.
Mentor trades on the New York Stock Exchange as Civitas Solutions Inc., which reported $1.2 billion in revenue last year. Companies can often seem faceless, but like all public companies, Civitas is governed by a board of directors.

BuzzFeed News decided to find out whether members of the board knew about the problems exposed by the recent investigation, and if so, ask what they planned to do about it.
For some children, it’s a question of life and death.




Alexandria Hill
Alexandria Hill
Sherill Small, a Mentor foster parent in Texas, murdered 2-year-old Alexandria Hill in 2013, smashing in her skull. Mentor had placed the little girl with Small despite warning signs that she wasn’t fit to be a foster parent.

From September through December 2012, Small had taken in five foster children, but every one of them had been removed as “failed placements.” Small, according to an internal Mentor document obtained by BuzzFeed News, “reported feeling stressed out, and will express that she is unable to care for the children in the home.” The Mentor document also warns that personnel from the Texas state Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program “felt the children should not be in the home at that time.” Less than a month after that report, Mentor placed little Alexandria with Small, the foster mother who would become her murderer.



Aram Roston / BuzzFeed News
In Maryland, Stephen Merritt, one of several Mentor foster parents at a compound called Last Chance Farm, pleaded guilty in 2011 to sexually abusing multiple boys in his care. Another foster father on same compound, Tracy Grant Bayne, also admitted to abusing a boy. Again, warning signs weren’t heeded. As far back as 2004, a boy had complained to his Mentor caseworker that he was being abused. The caseworker sent him back to Merritt. Police investigated allegations of abuse twice, but didn’t find enough to press charges.

psychotherapist wrote Mentor in 2010, warning of “huge red flags” in Merritt’s interaction with a child. But it would be another year before police finally arrested Merritt and stopped the abuse.

An analysis of Texas data by BuzzFeed News found that Mentor ranked last among large foster placement providers in the state, based on the number of severe violations per home. Texas regulators found more than 100 serious problems in Mentor foster homes in the last two years, including, but not limited to, instances of children being slapped, hit with belts, and struck.

In Georgia, where the state grades child-placing agencies, Mentor’s fared poorly as well. Of the six branches Mentor runs in Georgia, not one scored an average grade above the median in the 10 most recent quarters.

State and local governments have long worked with nonprofits and religious groups to help find good homes for children whose parents can’t care for them. But over the past several decades, for-profit companies have started winning contracts to manage foster care placements. Former Mentor employees said that the pressure to make profits sometimes led to Mentor cutting corners on protecting the children — a charge Mentor strongly disputed in BuzzFeed News' original story. Mentor also said it has helped thousands of children, and pointed to Maryland, where state regulators recently gave the company high marks.

In 2006, National Mentor Holdings was bought for $242 million in cash by Vestar Capital Partners, a giant hedge fund based in New York City. The company went public last year under the name Civitas, but Vestar still owns about two-thirds of the stock. Three Vestar employees sit on Civitas’ board: Chris Durbin, James Elrod Jr., and Kevin Mundt.



Civitas Solutions / Via civitas-solutions.com
When BuzzFeed News called Vestar to ask to interview its employees after the investigation was published, a spokesperson said, “Vestar declined to comment.”

These Board Members are beholden to no one, not one elected official, not one U.S. citizen, not one parent and can never, ever, be criminally prosecuted for Medicaid fraud, civil rights violations, or your basic human trafficking.

That is why I have always been a SOX gal.

Before the story ran, the spokesperson had provided this statement: “Vestar shares MENTOR Network’s belief that one tragedy within any foster care program is one too many. Mentor’s investments over the past decade to strengthen service quality while expanding programming have been fully supported by Vestar. We are proud to be associated with an organization that has enhanced the lives of tens of thousands of children and adolescents and adults with disabilities.”


Federico Peña, Pamela Lenehan, Guy Sansone, and Greg Torres
US Department of Energy, Civitas Solutions / Via civitas-solutions.com
Federico Peña, Pamela Lenehan, Guy Sansone, and Greg Torres
Federico Peña isn’t a Civitas board member but he’s a “senior advisor” to Vestar. He’s also a powerful political figure, a former national co-chair of the Obama presidential campaign and a secretary of transportation and a secretary of energy under President Bill Clinton. Reached after the story ran, and told about the problems at Mentor, he said he had not read the BuzzFeed News story. “"I’m not involved in that matter but thank you for the call and I have to go."

Pamela Lenehan, who was elected to the Civitas board in 2008, did not answer numerous phone calls from BuzzFeed News.

Guy Sansone, a healthcare consultant, did not respond to a phone call and email placed by BuzzFeed News.

Greg Torres – former president and CEO of Mentor from 1996-2004 – did not respond to a phone call and email placed by BuzzFeed News.

BuzzFeed News did not reach Patrick M. Gray, an accountant and former audit partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

I will be revisiting the role of PricewaterhouseCoopers and other governmental fraud schemes in future posts.


Patrick M. Gray, Edward Murphy and Bruce Nardella.
Civitas Solutions / Via civitas-solutions.com
Patrick M. Gray, Edward Murphy and Bruce Nardella.
Edward Murphy and Bruce Nardella currently work at Mentor. After BuzzFeed News had started contacting the other board members and before calling Murphy and Nardella, a Mentor spokesperson sent a statement on behalf of the entire board:

“Service quality and outcomes across The MENTOR Network are of paramount importance to the entire Board. We were aware of matters raised in your story, and especially the tragedies in Maryland and Texas. We are also aware of how profoundly the organization has been impacted by these tragedies, as well as the comprehensive actions management has taken in an effort to ensure the safety and well-being of the children and adolescents served in MENTOR’s programs.
“As a Board, we appreciate the challenges associated with foster care, and understand that while no provider will ever achieve perfection, each, including MENTOR, has a responsibility to strive for it in partnership with public agencies. We recognize that the good work of the MENTOR team has enhanced the lives of tens of thousands of children at-risk and adults with disabilities. However, we have also insisted that the organization learn from each mistake in order to enhance its programs and protect those it is privileged to support.”



An earlier version of this story contained remarks attributed to Civitas Solutions board member Patrick M. Gray. In fact, BuzzFeed News did not speak to that Patrick M. Gray but to a different person with the same name who claimed to be a Civitas board member.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©