The Delaware Department of Justice’s Office of Civil Rights & Public Trust announced Monday that a grand jury has indicted former Wilmington City Council President Theopalis K. Gregory on charges of Profiteering and Official Misconduct.
The DOJ alleges that Gregory, 67, used his position on City Council to secure a City grant that would enrich both himself and a non-profit that he founded. In October 2016, Gregory revived Students Disabilities Advocates, Inc. (SDA), a private entity he controlled, which had been dormant for 18 years. Shortly after the 2016 election, Gregory is alleged to have told his successor, City Council President Hanifa Shabazz, that $40,000 in City grant funds were earmarked for SDA, and to have repeatedly pressured Shabazz, while still in office, to grant the request after she was sworn in. Because SDA lacked non-profit status at the time, Gregory is further alleged to have used the Police Athletic League of Wilmington (PAL-W) as a pass-through for the funds.
One day after Mr. Gregory left office, PAL-W submitted a grant application, which was approved and signed by Shabazz in January 2017, requesting $40,000 for SDA as a pilot program. The grant included in its budget a $20,000 payment to Gregory, who has publicly acknowledged receiving at least $15,000 personally. A State Auditor’s report and an independent investigation both found that Gregory’s actions violated a number of provisions of the Wilmington City Code. In April 2019, Gregory admitted to the Wilmington Ethics Commission that his actions violated the Wilmington City Code.
The DOJ reminds the public that an indictment is merely an allegation and is not evidence of guilt. Defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a jury trial at which the State bears the burden of proving each charge beyond a reasonable doubt.
Children's Trust Funds is the reason why we are in SCOTUS.
The link, below, is the first Petition for Certiorari, and a bit of history, in dealing with the chattel law in the trafficking of tiny humans under DACA and DAPA for National Adoption Month.
In short, DACA and DAPA are policies, not laws, because the Congress refuses to make law in dealing with child immigration.
The reason why the Congress will not touch the fraud in child welfare is because it is what keeps them in a job.
That is why you have the States jumping to defend DACA because it is their money maker through the Public Private Partnerships o Children's Trust Funds:
This dispute concerns the policy of immigration enforcement
discretion known as Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals (DACA). In 2016, this Court affirmed,
by an equally divided Court, a decision of the
Fifth Circuit holding that two related Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) discretionary enforcement
policies, including an expansion of the DACA policy,
were likely unlawful and should be enjoined. See
United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (per curiam). In
September 2017, DHS determined that the original
DACA policy was unlawful and would likely be struck
down by the courts on the same grounds as the related
policies. DHS thus instituted an orderly wind-down of
the DACA policy. The questions presented are as follows:
1. Whether DHS’s decision to wind down the DACA
policy is judicially reviewable.
2. Whether DHS’s decision to wind down the DACA
policy is lawful.
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING
Petitioners are the Donald J. Trump, President of
the United States; Jefferson B. Sessions III, Attorney
General of the United States; Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary
of Homeland Security; U.S. Department of Homeland
Security; and the United States.
Respondents are the Regents of the University of California;
Janet Napolitano, President of the University of
California; the State of California; the State of Maine; the
State of Maryland; the State of Minnesota; the City of San
Jose; Dulce Garcia; Miriam Gonzalez Avila; Saul Jimenez
Suarez; Viridiana Chabolla Mendoza; Norma Ramirez; Jirayut
Latthivongskorn; the County of Santa Clara; and
Service Employees International Union Local 521.
And, in the Vidal, et. al. case, you have:
Respondents are Martin Jonathan Batalla Vidal, Antonio
Alarcon, Eliana Fernandez, Carlos Vargas,
Mariano Mondragon, and Carolina Fung Feng, on behalf
of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals;
Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its
members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals;
the State of New York; the State of Massachusetts; the
State of Washington; the State of Connecticut; the State
of Delaware; the District of Columbia; the State of Hawaii;
the State of Illinois; the State of Iowa; the State of
New Mexico; the State of North Carolina; the State of Oregon;
the State of Pennsylvania; the State of Rhode Island;
the State of Vermont; the State of Virginia; and the
State of Colorado.
I have included the petition for cert of the individual DREAMer defendants, below.
In a nutshell, Brown v. Board of Education is child welfare legal precedent because it was the very first case that was based in what they called "science" back then.
The SCOTUS case was fast tracked by enjoining all parties into on case for orals and opinion.
I ran across a study that was actually used in one of the many enjoined cases in this action that came out of Kansas calledBrown v. Board of Education.
Because, the chattel model was created, right here, in Michigan called the Michigan Children's Trust Fund and the model transposed to Kansas to set up the parent trust fund.
Dr. Ray E. Helfer, M.D., began using his influence to create a protected source of funding for prevention by persuading the state legislature in Michigan to increase funding to add 50 full-time “prevention workers” to the protective services budget. After the “prevention worker” positions had been created and filled, all 50 had full-time protective service caseload and none of them was doing any prevention work. The needs and demands of children in crisis had compelled the decision makers to divert the money to treatment. This event helped shape the law that created Michigan’s Children’s Trust Fund and served as a model for all states.
In summation, DACA is nothing but a product of judicial lobbying of legislating from the bench through privatization under UCC laws as foreign corporations to fund political campaigns, to ensure more trafficking of tiny human policies go through so there is more appropriation of federal funding to secure more foreign contracts designed to traffic more tiny humans for the continuance of stealin' children, land and votes.
This is the reason why Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare is going to SCOTUS.
It all started in Detroit.
It all started with the children because no one cares and there are too many trillions of dollars involved.
Conyers Bill Included as part of Legislation Providing Funds for Disaster Relief
Washington, D.C. –H.R. 2266, a $36.5 billion humanitarian aid package for victims of hurricanes Harvey, Irma, Maria and Nate passed the U.S. House and U.S. Senate and is now set to become law. The bill includes an amended version of Congressman John Conyers’ (MI-13) legislation that will extend 14 temporary bankruptcy judgeships and establish four additional bankruptcy judgeships across the Nation. The bill extends the temporary bankruptcy judgeship in the Eastern District of Michigan as well as authorizes an additional bankruptcy judgeship for that District, which serves the City of Detroit.
According to the Judicial Conference, without extending the temporary judgeship and adding another judgeship for the Eastern District of Michigan, the District’s caseload would exceed by 40 percent of the caseload standard for a federal judicial district. The legislation passed out of the U.S. House of Representatives on October 12th, the U.S. Senate on October 24th and now heads to the president’s desk for signature.
Congressman Conyers released the following statement:
Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
“This legislation will ensure that citizens of Detroit, especially those facing economic distress, are able to obtain financial relief from a fully-staffed bankruptcy court. While I would have preferred the original version of my legislation, which would have made these judgeships permanent, I am pleased that Congress took action.
“H.R. 2266 also contains much needed economic aid to those who were harmed by recent hurricanes and wildfires and provides critical debt relief to the citizens of Puerto Rico by forgiving certain flood insurance obligations and loans owed by the Commonwealth.
“This aid package reflects how our Nation -- when called upon to address overwhelming devastation resulting from natural disaster and economic distress -- can come together to provide critical aid to those most in need.”
In addition to extending a temporary bankruptcy judgeship and adding an additional bankruptcy judge in Detroit, this legislation will expand temporary judgeships in Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Nevada, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, and Virginia. The legislation also adds additional bankruptcy judges in Delaware and Maryland. The Judicial Conference of the United States has warned that without this legislation, the Nation’s bankruptcy courts would “face a serious and, in many cases, debilitating workload crisis if these temporary judgeships were to expire.”
So this past Sunday, I took sort of a snap shot of the US Child Welfare Systems, and what they had been up to or what the people have been concerned with over the last few months. Based on the information I collected in my notebook, I have uncovered certain trends. The first of those trends Iwrote about on this past Sunday. Not everybody agrees with my findings, but they are subject to change at any time and are only a reflection of the most recent information.
Today I would like to bring your attention to another trend I noticed in the data I collected. That would be the opposite extreme, the quiet or more secretive states. All Child Welfare systems should have some level of transparency so that the public knows what's going on. Many of these systems however, have systematically been able to avoid public scrutiny for years. Some more than others and the Top 5 will be listed here now.
We haven't actually heard very much from this state as of late and when we do it's usually an opinion piece or somebody getting arrested for abusing a foster child. I'm not saying that this state doesn't have it's share of problems, just that they are really good at sweeping them under the rug.
North Dakota was having some issues with child welfare on an Indian reservation and turnover rates a couple years back but that has faded into the past. We haven't heard much from them since.
Because I'm running a news blog, I can only work with what CPS gives me. I try to give every state or country the opportunity to make this blog with their fraud, failures and fuck-ups and I do so as fairly as I can. Delaware comes in at Number 3 because in the last 5 years, there has been nothing to come out of that state in terms of news. Nothing. With the exception of a ban on spanking back in 2012, a case where a CPS Agent said, give me sex or I'll take your kid, and a couple of foster care abuse cases, we wouldn't know the states child welfare system even exists.
New Hampshire could be compared to a trap door spider, waiting for his prey or a cop hiding on a dark road waiting for a speeder to go buy. The New Hampshire child welfare system is a state of pure evil that hides in the shadows and pounces on it's victims leaving a trail of heartbreak and anger. Thanks to the work of Unhappy Grammy we know this, but you can forget about staying informed via any major news paper.
And the Number 1 most secretive child welfare system in the country is...
Wyoming's CPS has flown under the radar for as long as I've been at this. Making Legally Kidnapped a whopping 17 times, since the beginning, the state keeps it's secrets well.
The First Amendment of the Constitution is put into place so that the government would be subject to checks and balances. The people need to know. If they aren't aware of what a mess Child Welfare in the United States really is then the agencies will continue to get away with it for a good long time.
