Showing posts with label NSA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NSA. Show all posts

Monday, August 17, 2020

DOJ: Former CIA Officer Arrested and Charged with Espionage

Non Disclosure Agreements...

I like the bearing false witness direction.

#maytheheavensfall


Alexander Yuk Ching Ma, 67, a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer, was arrested on Aug. 14, 2020, on a charge that he conspired with a relative of his who also was a former CIA officer to communicate classified information up to the Top Secret level to intelligence officials of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).  The Criminal Complaint containing the charge was unsealed this morning.
Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers, U.S. Attorney for the District of Hawaii Kenji M. Price, Assistant Director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division Alan E. Kohler Jr., and Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Honolulu Field Office Eli S. Miranda made the announcement.
“The trail of Chinese espionage is long and, sadly, strewn with former American intelligence officers who betrayed their colleagues, their country and its liberal democratic values to support an authoritarian communist regime,” said Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers.  “This betrayal is never worth it.  Whether immediately, or many years after they thought they got away with it, we will find these traitors and we will bring them to justice.  To the Chinese intelligence services, these individuals are expendable.  To us, they are sad but urgent reminders of the need to stay vigilant.”
 “The charges announced today are a sobering reminder to our communities in Hawaii of the constant threat posed by those who seek to jeopardize our nation’s security through acts of espionage,” said U.S. Attorney Price. “Of particular concern are the criminal acts of those who served in our nation’s intelligence community, but then choose to betray their former colleagues and the nation-at large by divulging classified national defense information to China. My office will continue to tenaciously pursue espionage cases.”
“This serious act of espionage is another example in a long string of illicit activities that the​People's Republic of China is conducting within and against the United States,” said Alan E. Kohler Jr., Assistant Director of the FBI's Counterintelligence Division.  “This case demonstrates that no matter the length or difficulty of the investigation, the men and women of the FBI will work tirelessly to protect our national security from the threat posed by Chinese intelligence services.  Let it be known that anyone who violates a position of trust to betray the United States will face justice, no matter how many years it takes to bring their crimes to light.”
“These cases are very complicated and take years if not decades to bring to a conclusion,” said Eli Miranda, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Honolulu Division.  “I could not be more proud of the work done by the men and women of the FBI's Honolulu Division in pursuing this case. Their dedication is a reminder that the FBI will never waiver when it comes to ensuring the safety and security of our nation.”
Ma is a naturalized U.S. citizen born in Hong Kong. According to court documents, Ma began working for the CIA in 1982, maintained a Top Secret clearance, and signed numerous non-disclosure agreements in which he acknowledged his responsibility and ongoing duty to protect U.S. government secrets during his tenure at CIA.  Ma left the CIA in 1989 and lived and worked in Shanghai, China before arriving in Hawaii in 2001.
According to court documents, Ma and his relative (identified as co-conspirator #1) conspired with each other and multiple PRC intelligence officials to communicate classified national defense information over the course of a decade.  The scheme began with three days of meetings in Hong Kong in March 2001 during which the two former CIA officers provided information to the foreign intelligence service about the CIA’s personnel, operations, and methods of concealing communications.  Part of the meeting was captured on videotape, including a portion where Ma can be seen receiving and counting $50,000 in cash for the secrets they provided.
The court documents further allege that after Ma moved to Hawaii, he sought employment with the FBI in order to once again gain access to classified U.S. government information which he could in turn provide to his PRC handlers. In 2004, the FBI’s Honolulu Field Office hired Ma as a contract linguist tasked with reviewing and translating Chinese language documents.  Over the following six years, Ma regularly copied, photographed and stole documents that displayed U.S. classification markings such as “SECRET.”  Ma took some of the stolen documents and images with him on his frequent trips to China with the intent to provide them to his handlers.  Ma often returned from China with thousands of dollars in cash and expensive gifts, such as a new set of golf clubs.
According to court documents, in spring 2019, over the course of two in-person meetings, Ma confirmed his espionage activities to an FBI undercover employee Ma believed was a representative of the PRC intelligence service, and accepted $2,000 in cash from the FBI undercover as “small token” of appreciation for Ma’s assistance to China.  Ma also offered to once again work for the PRC intelligence service.  On August 12, 2020, during a meeting with an FBI undercover employee before arrest, Ma again accepted money for his past espionage activities, expressed his willingness to continue to help the Chinese government, and stated that he wanted “the motherland” to succeed.
Ma will make his initial appearance before a federal judge tomorrow in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii.  He is charged with conspiracy to communicate national defense information to aid a foreign government and faces a maximum penalty of life imprisonment if convicted.  The maximum sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes.  In the event Ma is convicted, a federal district court judge will determine any sentence after taking into account the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
The investigation was conducted by the FBI’s Honolulu and Los Angeles Field Offices. Assistant U.S. Attorney Ken Sorenson and Trial Attorneys Scott Claffee and Steve Marzen of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.
Attachment(s): 

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, October 26, 2019

Omar Awan Has Been Found In A Burnt Out Tesla

Here is Omar Awan.

If this is the same one in congress, this is going to be interesting, but hey, what do I know?

I know someone should ask Imran Awan.

Dad died in burning Tesla because its futuristic doors wouldn’t open, lawsuit claims

Slender Man victim breaks silence for the first time
Edward Snowden reveals he trawled the CIA database for proof aliens exist
Incredible moment cops revive toddler choking on a cracker
Cops use genealogy website to find man who raped and strangled girl
A Tesla driver burned to death after a crash because the “futuristic handles” on his car trapped him inside and rescuers couldn’t open the doors, it is claimed.

Dr. Omar Awan, 48, lost control of his car, skidded across a road and smashed straight into a palm tree in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in February.

Smoke and then flames engulfed his blue Model S Tesla shortly after the crash.

A police officer arrived almost immediately, and crowds gathered outside the vehicle, but no one was able to save the father of five because of the “inaccessible door handles,” a lawsuit claims.

The car’s retractable door handles are meant to “auto-present” or pop out when they detect a key fob nearby.

But it malfunctioned, stopping first responders from opening the doors and saving Awan, it is claimed.

His loved ones are now suing the electric car company for wrongful death, alleging the car’s lithium-ion battery caught fire.

Enlarge ImageDr. Omar Awan lost control of his Tesla, skidded across a road and smashed straight into a palm tree in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Dr. Omar Awan lost control of his Tesla, skidded across a road and smashed straight into a palm tree in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.Local 10
The smoke from this suffocated Awan and burned him from his feet upwards, it claimed.

The complaint said the car burned for hours, reigniting several times even after firefighters extinguished the flames and also when it was being towed away.

The lawsuit added: “After the Tesla hit the tree, he was alive. He had no internal injuries or broken bones.

Enlarge ImageDr. Omar Awan
Dr. Omar Awan
“He died from the smoke he inhaled as he sat locked inside the Tesla, despite that a police officer and others were there and ready to help, until flames forced them away.

“The fire engulfed the car and burned Dr. Awan beyond recognition — all because the Model S has inaccessible door handles, no other way to open the doors, and an unreasonably dangerous fire risk.”

The Sun has contacted Tesla for a statement.

The company’s lawyers have not yet responded in court.

Tesla, the maker of electric vehicles, claimed the Model S once achieved the “best safety rating of any car tested.”

Awan’s family lawyer Stuart Grossman described the victim as environmentally sensitive and safety conscious.

He insisted Awan could afford a Mercedes or another luxury vehicle but went with the 2016 Tesla because of its safety.

He added: “These things, they just love to burn. The car is so over-engineered.

“It’s so techy, it makes you want to buy a Chevy pickup truck.”

Enlarge ImageSmoke and flames engulfed his blue Model S Tesla shortly after the crash.
Smoke and flames engulfed his blue Model S Tesla shortly after the crash.Local 10
After the incident, Tesla said in a statement: “We understand that speed is being investigated as a factor in this crash, and know that high-speed collisions can result in a fire in any type of car, not just electric vehicles.”

His family is seeking more than $15,000 in damages.

The emergency guide says: “If the door handles do not function, open the door manually by reaching inside the window and using the interior door handle.”

It is not the first time Tesla has been blamed for a death.

In May 2018, Barrett Riley and his friend Edgar Monserratt, both 18, died when they lost control of Riley’s dad’s car at 116 mph.

Dad James Riley claimed Tesla is at fault for the speed, fire and the teens’ deaths.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, September 22, 2019

When Is A Whistleblower A Leaker?

Q: When is a whistleblower a leaker?


That is bearing false witness.



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, May 23, 2019

DOJ: WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Charged in 18-Count Superseding Indictment - DEFANGO

FUN FACT! I SENT WIKILEAKS DOCS ON MEDICAID FRAUD IN CHILD WELFARE WAY BACK.


Links: https://pastebin.com/Rczkh2nC
Charges Related to Illegally Obtaining, Receiving and Disclosing Classified Information

A federal grand jury returned an 18-count superseding indictment today charging Julian P. Assange, 47, the founder of WikiLeaks, with offenses that relate to Assange’s alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the United States.  Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers, U.S. Attorney G. Zachary Terwilliger for the Eastern District of Virginia, Assistant Director John Brown of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division and Acting Assistant Director in Charge Timothy Dunham of the FBI’s Washington Field Office made the announcement.
The superseding indictment alleges that Assange was complicit with Chelsea Manning, a former intelligence analyst in the U.S. Army, in unlawfully obtaining and disclosing classified documents related to the national defense.  Specifically, the superseding indictment alleges that Assange  conspired with Manning;  obtained from Manning and aided and abetted her in obtaining classified information with reason to believe that the information was to be used to the injury of the United States or the advantage of a foreign nation;  received and attempted to receive classified information having reason to believe that such materials would be obtained, taken, made, and disposed of by a person contrary to law; and  aided and abetted Manning in communicating classified documents to Assange. 
After agreeing to receive classified documents from Manning and aiding, abetting, and causing Manning to provide classified documents, the superseding indictment charges that Assange then published on WikiLeaks classified documents that contained the unredacted names of human sources who provided information to United States forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and to U.S. State Department diplomats around the world.  These human sources included local Afghans and Iraqis, journalists, religious leaders, human rights advocates, and political dissidents from repressive regimes.  According to the superseding indictment, Assange’s actions risked serious harm to United States national security to the benefit of our adversaries and put the unredacted named human sources at a grave and imminent risk of serious physical harm and/or arbitrary detention.
The superseding indictment alleges that beginning in late 2009, Assange and WikiLeaks actively solicited United States classified information, including by publishing a list of “Most Wanted Leaks” that sought, among other things, classified documents.  Manning responded to Assange’s solicitations by using access granted to her as an intelligence analyst to search for United States classified documents, and provided to Assange and WikiLeaks databases containing approximately 90,000 Afghanistan war-related significant activity reports, 400,000 Iraq war-related significant activities reports, 800 Guantanamo Bay detainee assessment briefs, and 250,000 U.S. Department of State cables.
Many of these documents were classified at the Secret level, meaning that their unauthorized disclosure could cause serious damage to United States national security.  Manning also provided rules of engagement files for the Iraq war, most of which were also classified at the Secret level and which delineated the circumstances and limitations under which United States forces would initiate or conduct combat engagement with other forces.
The superseding indictment alleges that Manning and Assange engaged in real-time discussions regarding Manning’s transmission of classified records to Assange.  The discussions also reflect that Assange actively encouraged Manning to provide more information and agreed to crack a password hash stored on U.S. Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet Protocol Network (SIPRNet), a United States government network used for classified documents and communications.  Assange is also charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion for agreeing to crack that password hash.
Assange is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison on each count except for conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, for which he faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison.  Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties.  A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after taking into account the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
First Assistant U.S. Attorney Tracy Doherty-McCormick, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kellen S. Dwyer, Thomas W. Traxler and Gordon D. Kromberg, and Trial Attorneys Matthew R. Walczewski and Nicholas O. Hunter of the Justice Department’s National Security Division are prosecuting the case.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime.  Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.
Topic(s): 
National Security
Press Release Number: 
19-575

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, April 21, 2019

The New Intelligence Community - Happy Child Abuse Propaganda Month

There comes a time when you just can no longer take the shit.

Everything being addressed started in child welfare because no one cares and it makes lots of money, just transpose the model.

This is the new intelligence community of the Quantum Renaissance and we are the original sources, the experts, the whistleblowers.

...on a  mission.




Happy Child Abuse Propaganda Month!



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Saturday, September 22, 2018

White House: President Trump Unveils America’s First Cybersecurity Strategy in 15 Years

How to build a cyberwall.

America’s networks are threatened daily by criminals, terrorists, and foreign adversaries. In the face of growing threats, the Federal Government has the responsibility to do its part to ensure America has the best cybersecurity in the world. Failures to prioritize cybersecurity by both government and industry have left our Nation less secure.

President Donald J. Trump is committed to protecting the cybersecurity of our Nation, and has made it clear that this Administration will do what it takes to make America cyber secure.

Since the beginning of President Trump’s Administration, he has taken action to protect the American people in cyber space. Building on these strong efforts, today, the President signed the National Cyber Strategy—the first fully articulated cyber strategy for the United States since 2003.

The National Cyber Strategy identifies decisive priority actions to protect the American people. This strategy makes clear that the Federal Government will never stop defending our interests, and that we will bring every element of American power to bear to protect our people in the digital domain.

This Administration will not treat cyberspace as a separate arena. Instead, we are integrating cyber into all elements of national power. Structuring the National Cyber Strategy around the four pillars of the National Security Strategy reflects and advances and this approach. These are the key tenets on which we build this National Cyber Strategy:

Protect the American People, the Homeland, and the American Way of Life. We will manage cybersecurity risks to increase the security and resilience of the Nation’s information and information systems. We will do this by taking specific steps to secure Federal networks and information, secure critical infrastructure, combat cybercrime, and improve incident reporting.

Promote American Prosperity. We will preserve America’s influence in the technological ecosystem and pursue development of cyberspace as an open engine of economic growth, innovation, and efficiency. To do this, we will support a vibrant and resilient digital economy, foster and protect American ingenuity, and develop a superior cybersecurity workforce.

Preserve Peace through Strength. We will identify, counter, disrupt, degrade, and deter behavior in cyberspace that is destabilizing and contrary to our national interests, while preserving America’s overmatch in and through cyberspace. To achieve this, we will do our part to enhance cyber stability through norms of responsible state behavior, attribution of unacceptable behavior in cyberspace, and the imposition of costs on malicious cyber actors.

Advance American Influence. We will preserve the long-term openness, interoperability, security, and reliability of the Internet, which supports and is reinforced by America’s interests. We will take specific global efforts to promote these objectives, while supporting market growth for infrastructure and emerging technologies and building cyber capacity internationally.

The American people expect our Nation to be a world leader on every front, including cyberspace. The prosperity and security of our people, and the preservation of our way of life, depend on our successful execution of this strategy. We have a lot of work to do, and there is no time to waste.

We will Make America Cyber Secure.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, July 2, 2018

SpyRingInCongress.com Day 5.2 Cohen, Sater, and Page, Informant Amigos

You do know they do the same thing with Child Protective Services, right?



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, June 29, 2018

DEFANGO: Wikileaks Vs Q? Deep Dive + Netflix Antifa Pizza Party - s03e12

Defango analyzes the current situations with Wikileaks, Q, Julian Assange, and Antifa in what I call a propaganda challenge to evidentary standards,

In essence, if one can plant a seed through manipulation of the public record, where, in this instance, mysterious, anonymous groups have generated a narrative, to question the credibility of Wikileaks, then the substance of the emails in the Clinton Foundation investigation can be thrown out,

The only problem with this scenario is that the data were preserved years ago and the issue was addressed in House Judiciary, in 2014.


The only problem with this plan, which sounds like the work of "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) is that the investigation is about child welfare, of which Wikileaks has not released, to the public that is, the emails and cables on the trafficking of tiny humans.



Another issue is this: if the question of a campaign, or perhaps elected and appointed officials, possess knowledge of leaking, or of an operation to interfere in ongoing investigations, such as the email investigation, which started under David Patreaus and has previously been addressed by House Judiciary, then why is this anonymous disinformation campaign not being addressed by FBI?

Is not "Q" a leaker, if, in fact, it does possess access to confidential, national intelligence, and, if not, why is it, then, allowed to redirect the narrative away from anything dealing with the trafficking of tiny humans, which includes entitites named in Wikileaks material that has and, more than likely, also named in traunches that have yet to be released.

Propaganda campaigns have always started in child welfare, because no one cares.

Enjoy Defango's Deep Dive...."A D3 Production".


The following is an article speaking upon cyberattacks through psychological operations through social media, a much more complex topic when looking through a lens of intellectual property and judicial redress of grievance. 

Qanon: The Path To Dictatorship

Virtually everyone following politics has heard of the #Qanon story. Religiously followed by a growing mass of disciples and vehemently assaulted by a variety of left wing propagandists ranging from Vice to Newsweek, the validity of its claims have sparked a uniquely passionate debate on both sides.  The ones championing its teaching as unquestionable truth range from imageboard dwelling millennials to a considerable number of boomers.  Be it truly the broadcast of insider intel or merely the flagship conspiracy of our time, it’s certainly an exciting read that provides quality entertainment for the end times.

But those faithfully trusting in Q to lead the overthrow of the evil “deep state cabal” and restore American democracy to the people may be missing a much darker purpose for the Qanon posts.  

Used as a highly efficient propaganda tool, Q’s drops may actually be aiding an attempt to dismantle the judiciary altogether.  Should it succeed in pushing this distrust across the public through the oft-cited “Great Awakening, this narrative may actually serve to weaponize Americans into removing the only barrier left to toppling democracy and clearing the way for an Emperor to ascend to the throne. That is, of course, assuming that a coup d’etat has not already taken place.

The basic theme to the Qanon 8chan posts are that Trump and Sessions are frantically working behind the scenes to bring down what we all now know to be a very real and very corrupt deep state shadow government.  The antagonists — corrupt intelligence agency officials, congressmen, and news media plants — did not expect Trump to win and therefore are in “panic mode” over a number of crimes committed over the last eight to twenty years.  These crimes allegedly range from what we’ve seen already (election rigging, dark money, bribes take by elected officials and intelligence agencies) to the far-fetched (mass sex trafficking and pedophilia among elected officials). Some predictions have failed (Hillary Clinton being arrested in October 2017) while others have been eerily prophetic (the pope’s bizarre suggestion of changing the Lord’s prayer).

Perhaps the most compelling narrative is Q’s assertion that high level crime and corruption has been committed within Obama’s Department of Justice and heads of the intelligence agencies, going up to his Chief of Staff Loretta Lynch.  Q compares the systematic dismantling of these “bad actors” to defusing a bomb: the right wires must be cut to disable the mechanism without detonating the entire thing. In this case, the “explosion” of an inadvertent detonation would be the complete collapse of the entire Judicial Branch of America. Q warns that if such an event could occur, all court rulings throughout this period of time could be rendered null and void, and ultimately be challenged according to our current legal channels.

But what if this is the actual plan?

Thanks to the perfect storm of recent disasters ranging from James Clapper’s NSA spying (and perjury upon questioned of it) to former FBI director James  Comey’s destructive letter to Congress about reopening the Clinton email case, Deputy director Andrew McCabe’s contradicting testimony, all of the horrors of the recent IG report, and DOJ’s complete lack of prosecution of any of these crimes, the entire foundation of our intelligence agencies and judicial department is weak and may easily be toppled. The public has lost faith in our judicial department, and has lost faith in all of our intelligence agencies.

Correction: almost all of our intelligence agencies.
There is one agency that remains free of scandal, unearthed corruption, and public distrust: Military Intelligence.  Coincidentally, this is the one place that Trump seems to be comfortably nestled within, protected by its rank and file like the walls of an impenetrable fortress.  Some even speculate that the Qanon postings are an MI counter op that was planned since before Trump took the Oval Office:
According to veteran investigative reporter and best selling author, Dr. Jerome Corsi, he was approached three years ago by a group of generals and told that Donald Trump had been recruited by U.S. military intelligence to run in the 2016 Presidential elections, and subsequently help remove corrupt Deep State officials from positions of power. Corsi claims that QAnon represents the same group of senior military intelligence officials who are exposing the Deep State corruption and officials involved in a history of treasonous actions against the U.S. Republic.
Trump has, from the start of his presidency, surrounded himself by generals and high ranking military personnel.  He has given in to their demands even when in strict opposition to his voter base’s opinion. His spending budget was riddled with Democrat concessions in favor of remarkable military spending. In nearly all of his speeches he’s praised his soldiers and even suggested an American military parade.   This is likely why Q believes Trump is completely untouchable by Mueller’s highly biased quest to ignite a Trump impeachment, as indicated in many of his posts.

It is without question that America’s deep state will go full throttle to attempt to sabotage the Trump presidency before their crimes are unearthed and prosecuted.  We now know that Obama had spies inside Trump’s campaign, had FBI agents offering his colleagues damaging information on Hillary on behalf of Russia, and had baited a “Russian Collusion” setup in the strange event that he would win.  Whether or not Trump actually committed any crimes during his campaign is insignificant: Mueller is going to attempt to set the stage for an impeachment vote, and the media will throw everything they have at the public to get them to consider.  If this fails, they will use all of the media weapons at their disposal to grow a public uprising to try to force Trump out of power while rogue intelligence agents (now removed) will try to sabotage any investigations that may deter this.

But through this gamble, they have inadvertently cleared the path for Trump to garner the public support he needs to overthrow the constitution and seize full authoritarian control of America.  He has already successfully (and thankfully) dismantled the public’s trust of the mainstream media by proving their complete corruption.  This is step two of overthrowing any democracy, with step one being garnering control of the military (which Trump appears to already have done).  To complete the transition, he needs to either attain control of or dismantle the judicial branch.  With the unprecedented Democrat stonewalling on all of his judicial appointees, the former may not be possible. But with the massive failures of all intelligence agencies and the years of DOJ failures to prosecute criminal swamp creatures, there is a growing consensus that our judicial system is broken beyond repair.  Should evidence arrive that the DOJ was compromised; the stage will be set for Trump to conquer.

Qanon’s world is built upon a presumed “great awakening” within public consciousness.  But this awakening might actually be a conditioning: a conditioning of the masses to rally behind Trump’s military order at any cost. And its likelihood of success is very considerable: it is without a doubt that any attempt to remove Trump, no matter what the grounds or the crime, will be met with the full wrath of most of our country.  With at least half of the population firmly behind Trump (unironically the half who is likely to own a firearm), and the power of a strengthened military at his disposal, Trump should be able to seize the throne without much resistance.

It’s possible that Q is just a conspiracy theory, and it’s also possible that it’s real.  But to assume either may underestimate its purpose and its potential.  Q may instead be a sign of the empire to come, and a powerful weapon in crafting its long-overdue reign.  If this is a case, we can look forward to an end of many of the liberal woes we’ve seen over the last 50 years.

Again, the moral of the story is, "Do not be mean to my Sweetie. Period."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

Cocktails & Popcorn: Imran Awan Strikes Immunity Plea Deal

Related image
For all the reasons why Perkins Coie sucks.
Enjoy.
Everyone is dry snitching.

Imran Awan is going to tell a really good tale.

There is going to be:
  • Espionage;
  • Money laundering;
  • Child welfare fraud;
  • Campaign finance fraud;
  • Voting fraud;
  • Sex, drugs & dark weapons;
  • Trafficking tiny humans;
  • TARP;
  • Detroit Land Bank Authority;
  • DNC;
  • RNC;
  • Blackmail;
  • Bribery;
  • Election fraud;
  • Forgery;
  • Domestic terrorism;
  • Medicaid fraud;
  • An epic romance; and,
  • All the reasons why Perkins Coie Sucks.



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, May 3, 2018

Friday, April 20, 2018

Monday, April 16, 2018

DOJ: OIG Horowitz Announces Review Of DOJ FISC Of A "Certain Person"

Something tells me the review is already completed.

They have everything, and I mean everything.

The phone calls.

The emails.

The videos.

The photos.

The financial transactions.

The whistleblowers.

Now, who, exactly, is this "certain person"?

Stay tuned.


DOJ OIG Announces Initiation of Review Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz announced today that, in response to requests from the Attorney General and Members of Congress, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) will initiate a review that will examine the Justice Department’s and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) compliance with legal requirements, and with applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) relating to a certain U.S. person.

As part of this examination, the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source.

Additionally, the OIG will review the DOJ’s and FBI’s relationship and communications with the alleged source as they relate to the FISC applications.

If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, March 18, 2018

Title Source Has Been Anointed As A $706 Million Corporate Shape Shifter

What we have here is another example of a Corporate Shape Shifter.

These Corporate Shape Shifters come in all forms and sizes so you never know who is in charge, or rather who to charge, or rather what is the proper jurisdiction to charge, or rather who is willing to find a proper jurisdiction that is not part of the Corporate Shape Shifters.

Amrock, but which one is which?
I only ask at which point in time is the true existence of a Corporate Shape Shifter, for only a judge may toll a statute.

Either way, it does not matter because they were stealin'.


If you follow the timeline of Title Sources' metamorphisis into a Corporate Shape Shifter, one shall witness, as so graciously recorded in the annals of history by the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, that Title Source, Inc., which was cashing checks and submitting fake tax filings to the IRS on behalf of the Detroit Land Bank Authority, may have been one of those magical, made up real estate Corporate Shape Shifters is because, according to the court filings, it did not exist when it took individuals money, billed TARP, levied taxes, and other nasty stuff.

Then, the Corporate Shape Shifters made Title Source go through a ritual ceremony of changing names over and over again, which means, it may have been improperly named in my FCA, leading it to argue out that it never existed, and as such, did not do anything, because it is now, Amrock.

Look at the software and applications.  They are all third party and there is nothing in federal  procurement policy which addresses the privatization of data, particularly if it sold through Corporate Shape Shifters.


They change appearance through the manipulation of data, the entire network of human intelligence, including the amalgamation of data to shove into those crappy predictive modeling algorithms to "maximize revenue" from "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth).

Rumor has it there are some of these "real time" satellite technologies up in the Mayor of Detroit's office, a gift from Dan Gilbert/Rock Financial/Quicken/Title Source/Amrock. or whatever the Corporate Shape Shifter flavor of the week is.

You cannot hold someone accountable if you do not know who they are.

This is privatization and it is being implemented through that nanotechnology stuff.

I pulled the HouseCanary Docket against Title Source.

Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems that Title Source had contracted with HouseCanary to run some Detroit property scheme and it backfired sometime after I filed my case against Title Source for being a cloaking Corporate Shape Shifters of Michigan, one being Detroit Land Bank Authority.

It seems to me that HouseCanary could not run their stuff because Title Source was providing them with dirty data, so, instead of admitting they were selling dirty data, the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) for Title Source, came up with the brilliant idea to become a Corporate Shape Shifter, too!

Title Source has been officially anointed as a Corporate Shape Shifter.

The dirty data is all the Detroit fraudulent property titles...and deeds...and taxes...and ownership...and foreclosures...and judgments...and certified judgments...and mortgages...and bankruptcies...and the votes...  any other forms of stealin'.

See, it goes like this:

When you change your name, and you are a litigant in a federal court of law, you typically notify the court.


Image result for amrock
"Amrock, formerly known as Title Source."
Perhaps, the reason why Title Source has yet to notify the court in my case that they are now Amrock is because it is part of the legal strategy, developed by the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending), to get out of being busted for selling dirty data from Detroit Land Bank Authority.

Perhaps, the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) representing Title Source thought they would be able to use the same legal arguments in the Artist formerly known as Prince pulled on Warner Bros. to get his intellectual property back.

"We are Amrock, not Title Source.  We never gave dirty data to the U.S. Department of Treasury, Title Source did it and now they are no more.  Tah Dah!!!"



I just thought I would go out there on a limb and proffer this legal postulation in the Detroit investigations because that is what they said in response to the HouseCanary verdict.

In a statement Thursday night, Quicken Loans CEO Jay Farner said: "Quicken Loans and its parent Rock Holdings Inc. were never parties to the recent litigation between HouseCanary and Amrock, nor is either company subject to any liability in connection with yesterday's verdict announced in the state court in San Antonio, Texas. In addition, Quicken Loans and Rock Holdings Inc. were never a party to the contract at issue and there was never a single claim filed against Quicken Loans or Rock Holdings, Inc. in this lawsuit."

Quicken affiliate hit with $706M verdict

A Quicken Loans affiliate based in Detroit has been ordered to pay $706.2 million after a Texas jury this week found it had taken trade secrets from a real estate data firm, officials announced Thursday.

The case stems from a 2015 contract between Title Source, now known as HouseCanary. The contract was to develop software to provide appraisal as well as real estate valuations, attorneys said in a statement Thursday.

In a statement Thursday, Amrock CEO Jeff Eisenshtadt called the verdict “a travesty of justice” and the company planned to appeal.

Representatives for HouseCanary, which has offices in California, Colorado and Texas, could not be reached for comment Thursday night.

Its lawyers said Title Source declined to pay the company after 18 months of work and sued in Bexar County, Texas, to avoid contract fees for its real estate data, analytics and valuation technology.
Amrock is the nation’s largest independent company offering title insurance, valuations and closing services, its website says.

Through a countersuit HouseCanary alleged the company misappropriated trade secrets, which violated signed agreements governing non-disclosure and limiting use of the information.
“Title Source and its family of companies (including Quicken Loans) wanted access to HouseCanary’s technology and data to develop its own competing analytics and software,” HouseCanary attorneys said Thursday.

In a statement Thursday night, Quicken Loans CEO Jay Farner said: "Quicken Loans and its parent Rock Holdings Inc. were never parties to the recent litigation between HouseCanary and Amrock, nor is either company subject to any liability in connection with yesterday's verdict announced in the state court in San Antonio, Texas. In addition, Quicken Loans and Rock Holdings Inc. were never a party to the contract at issue and there was never a single claim filed against Quicken Loans or Rock Holdings, Inc. in this lawsuit."

After a seven-week trial, a jury on Wednesday awarded HouseCanary $235.4 million for misappropriation of the trade secrets and fraud claims and $471.4 million in punitive damages.

In response to the verdict, Eisenshtadt said: “HouseCanary made several unkept promises leading Amrock to file a contract claim. However, when we asked the court to intervene, a local attorney and professional plaintiff law firm spun a distorted and twisted counterclaim narrative leading a San Antonio jury to an unconscionable result.”

Eisenshtadt added Amrock never received working software from HouseCanary but “wireframes and half-developed apps that were completely unusable by the company. After HouseCanary breached its contract, we ended our relationship with the company and were forced to develop our own tool in-house.”

His company started out as Stewart Title of Michigan in the 1990s before becoming Title Source, according to its website. Last month, the company  It has offices in California, Ohio, Texas and Pennsylvania, with headquarters relocating to Detroit in 2012.

Quicken’s website describes Amrock as among its family of companies and “on the forefront of industry innovation, with a large team dedicated to developing new technology and software.”

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 5, California.

No. B207861.

    Decided: August 19, 2009

Skousen Law,Robert James Skousen, San Bernardino, James Allen, Los Angeles, and Cindy Tran, for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.

Plaintiff was a Nevada corporation duly qualified to transact intrastate business in California when it filed this action in California.   Defendants cross-complained against plaintiff.   While the action was pending, plaintiff converted to a Delaware corporation, changed its name, and obtained a new certificate of qualification to transact intrastate business in California.   The trial court granted defendants' motion to strike the complaint and all responsive pleadings filed after the date of conversion on the ground that plaintiff failed to comply with the conversion requirements set forth in Corporations Code section 1157 1 or notify the court and California's Secretary of State of the corporate changes.   The court entered judgment in favor of defendants on the cross-complaint.

On appeal, plaintiff contends the trial court abused its discretion in striking plaintiff's pleadings because it was a corporation in good standing in its home state, as well as in full compliance with California laws regulating the transaction of business by foreign corporations.   We conclude that plaintiff had the capacity to maintain pending actions under Nevada and Delaware laws, plaintiff was duly qualified to transact intrastate business in California, and section 1157 does not apply to the conversion of a foreign corporation to another foreign business entity.   Therefore, we reverse.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, February 21, 2018

What Is The Difference Between FISA & CPS?

CPS uses administrative databases of social welfare programs for parallel construction to take your kids and FISA uses NSA databases for parallel construction to take your assets.

They both use ex parte hearings by submitting fabricated evidence and are immune from prosecution.

Why?

They both have the Right To Lie and it makes privatized public service corporations lots of profit.



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, February 15, 2018

CONYERS: Deep State Disco - FISA & Judiciary


Below is a sample timeline of Conyers' work in Judiciary addressing FISA, 702, Rule 41 and the Intelligence Community operations of surveillance going back to 2013.

FISA oversight was transferred from Judiciary to Foreign Intelligence Committee.








Bipartisan Coalition Presses DOJ About Government Hacking













Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©