Showing posts with label TPR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TPR. Show all posts

Thursday, March 7, 2019

JUDICIARY: VAWA Reauthorization Hearing - Jolly Jerry Forgets Truth In Testimony, ICWA, TPR & Its Legacy - My Colored Commentary

U.S. Representative Cedric Richmond is the first elected official to state "Termination of Parental Rights" into the congressional record of Judiciary.

A quick overview on the history of VAWA.

The House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security will hold a hearing on the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which officially expired on September 30, 2018, but was briefly extended in continuing resolutions before expiring in December 2018. The hearing will examine the broad range of issues related to the harms inflicted upon women, men, and children in America through domestic violence, sexual assault and harassment, dating violence, and stalking, as well as Congress’ role in addressing these issues. The hearing will also explore the potentially devastating effect of not reauthorizing VAWA, and the tremendous impact a prolonged lack of funding could have on millions of survivors across the country.


Ratcliffe spoke in defense of Faith Based organizations being left out of the reauthorization of VAWA.  He raised the political partisanship in passing the extension.

No mention of CPS, foster care or adoption, but Julie Beck spoke about the Lesbian Powers of the LBQRSTUV Community in gender identity laws without broaching anything DNA database related.

She spoke about child sexual abuse.

Unfortunately, there was no one to properly expound upon the gender identity laws under chattel law, more intuitively known in the legal world as Ecclesiastical Law, which is being pushed through Public Private Partnerships in the rebranding of parental rights and the children's trust funds.

Fathers have been victims of VAWA in the layers of fraudulent billing in child support and child welfare programs, where there have been instances where a man identified as an aggressor strictly for the purposes of a mother obtaining services.

Yes, you have to check the box in order to access help.

Yes, the VAWA programs are crap, riddled with fraud, which brings a judicial determination to turn on the federal funding spigot for Targeted Case Management, Medicaid fraud.

Ramona Gonzales did speak of children being removed, without saying foster care, if there is a domestic violence situation which is why the national data of child abuse and neglect are corrupt.

Sarah Deer spoke of Native Tribes inability of prosecuting non tribal members or even crimes of child abuse and against women.

Odd how she never mentioned the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) or its history of how the tribal constitutions developed, who was behind it, and the tribal exile based upon the blood quantum rule, as opposed to the one-drop rule.

It is time to address, in formal hearings, ICWA and all the covert "military" operations, including drug, child trafficking and money laundering on the reservations.

Gohmert got raw by asking the LBQRSTUV Lesbian why women must have "women only spaces" by loosely comparing it to "blacks only spaces". She responded by saying, "if women could experience these women only spaces, they will see how wonderful it is."  I would suggest she spend time in a women's only prison or go help mothers who have had their children legally kidnapped get them back.

Gohmert just brought up female genital mutilation as a violence against women, carefully guiding to the fact that it happens to girls, not women.

Richmond spoke on Termination of Parental Rights, as one of his first cases out of law school. No one has ever spoken upon this before.  He also mentioned CASA.  He made history.

Lieu spoke upon lack of resources for domestic violence survivors, homelessness, poverty, etc.  On a side note, your children can and will be removed, placed in foster care, under VAWA if you hail from "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth).

How to stop discrimination and increase to access to domestic violence services for LBQRSTUV individuals: report fraud!

Yes, many Faith Based private contractors will not only turn their noses up at a LBQRSTUV individual seeking help, they will advocate termination of parental rights if there is a child involved.  Take for instance any christian child placing agency, perhaps, I shall use Bethany Christian Services, which is notorious for ignoring its foster children who are gay and ask for help from being raped.

Perhaps, we can go as far back as St. Vincent Sarah Fisher Residential Institution who never wanted to do anything when it came to little boys being raped by bigger boys, or men, because, homosexuality is frowned upon in self reporting to DHHS, which is why the typical form of help is to drug the pain away with Medicaid cost reimbursed services and  testing second generation antipsychotropic human subject lab rats for corporate sponsorship.

Heck, Faith Based child placing agencies will not even allow LBQRSTUV to adopt.

Grand Rapids does not allow LBQRSTUV youth into its homeless shelters, but I digress.

VAWA has turned into a Social Impact Bond experimental social services program and not a reparative response to the residuals of the peculiar institution, its original intent, a step to end human trafficking of women.

It seems Jolly Jerry of Judiciary forgot the Truth in Testimony, the bios, and legacy of VAWA, but then again, he was probably more focused on his impeachment proceedings because not everyone is allowed due process of the law, right?


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, December 10, 2018

The Anatomy Of Election Interference: John Podesta, Pizzagate & Child Protective Services


For those of you who have yet to understand what happens when an individual is accused of child abuse, by an anonymous source, based upon a manufactured falsehood, a child can be removed by Child Protective Services, put in Foster Care, and eventually adopted out after a flurry of fraudulent Medicaid billing, costing tax payers millions.

How would you feel if someone accused you of child abuse where you had no access to any civil justice in a court of law?

The latest and greatest term of moving a child from one place to another, against the will of the parents, is labeled as human trafficking.


Whether or not this was intentional to deflect from the stealin' of children, land and votes, is left to the FBI to produce their investigative findings, which may be centered in the Office of the Special Counsel as a possible violation of the FCPA, being a foreign, funded operation.

I do not like John Podesta and his rogue ass crew because they were all mean to my Sweetie.




Everyone deserves to have their voices heard, if only for the purposes of preserving the annals of history so it never happens again.

John Podesta Is Ready to Talk About Pizzagate - The former Clinton campaign chairman is among the victims still recovering from a vile conspiracy theory that ended in gunfire

WASHINGTON — John Podesta has given it a lot of thought and believes the best way to deal with the trolls is to ignore them. His wife, Mary, however, takes a different approach. When angry people call their home in the middle of the night, she has a conversation with them.

“She sits on the phone and talks to them, which is disconcerting actually to most of the people who are calling just to leave a nasty message on your voicemail,” Podesta says. “When somebody actually engages them and says, ‘Why are you doing this?’ they fold pretty quickly. But she has more patience for that than I do.”

Podesta is easily forgiven for having little time for his tormentors. Since 2016, he has been the victim of a deranged and viral conspiracy theory known as Pizzagate. The theory — which has its roots in the emails stolen from his personal account by Russian hackers and dumped online by WikiLeaks — claimed that Podesta was a pedophile and that he, Hillary Clinton and a Washington, D.C., restaurateur named James Alefantis ran a child sex-trafficking ring from the basement of Alefantis’ pizzeria, Comet Ping Pong.

On its face, Pizzagate was insane, with zero basis in reality. Yet in the frenzied days after Donald Trump’s election, it caught fire on social media platforms including Twitter, YouTube, Reddit and 4Chan, metastasizing into a story so twisted and bizarre that it radicalized online trolls and traumatized others who, through no fault of their own, had gotten sucked into the conspiracy.

Two years ago this month, Pizzagate reached its grim apex when a 28-year-old man stormed into Comet Ping Pong with a revolver and an AR-15 on a mission to save the “children.” Edgar Maddison Welch had binge-watched YouTube videos about Pizzagate and tried to recruit friends for his rescue mission. “Raiding a pedo ring, possibly sacraficing [sic] the lives of a few for the lives of many,” he texted one friend a few days before he got in his Prius and drove from his home in North Carolina to Washington. Customers and employees fled the restaurant as Welch fired several rounds into a locked closet full of computer gear, searching for the infamous child sex dungeon in Comet’s basement, which he never found — not least because the pizzeria doesn’t even have a basement. No one was hurt, and Welch surrendered to the police, hands on his head, in broad daylight in the street outside of Comet. He was later sentenced to four years in federal prison.

Even after the arrest, Pizzagate lived on. The day after Welch stalked into Comet, Michael Flynn, Jr., the son of Trump’s first national security adviser, tweeted: “Until #Pizzagate proven to be false, it’ll remain a story.” An Economist/YouGov poll in late December 2016 found that 46 percent of Trump voters and 17 percent of Clinton voters thought Pizzagate was real. A few months later, a small rally of Pizzagate believers took place outside the White House. Protesters have stood outside Comet carrying blown-up photos of Alefantis’ god-daughter taken from his social media accounts. Strangers online have threatened to torture, rape and kill him.

“I’ve been through a lot of Washington shit in my life,” Alefantis tells Rolling Stone. He grew up in D.C., and dated David Brock, the notorious conservative journalist turned Clinton loyalist, for 10 years. “This is not my first time at the rodeo,” he says. “I had never seen this volume of specific, directed attacks.”

In the two years since the shooting, our understanding of online conspiracy theories has grown, of how they take root and the people who believe and spread those theories. But what about the victims? What is it like to be on the receiving end? How do you fight back against a plainly false allegation that changes your life?

***
For four decades John Podesta has worked at the highest levels of American politics: campaign chairman for Hillary Clinton’s historic 2016 presidential run, chief of staff to President Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, counselor to President Obama and adviser to senators and congressmen. But nothing could prepare him for Pizzagate.

Speaking about the conspiracy theory and its impact on his life for the first time, Podesta tells Rolling Stone that he learned about it the old-fashioned way: from the news. As Clinton campaign chair, he had spent the final month of the 2016 race locked in hand-to-hand combat with reporters about the contents of his personal emails, which WikiLeaks was releasing in periodic batches to damage Clinton’s chances. He didn’t have time to reflect on the hack, let alone notice the conspiracy theories bubbling up about him on websites like Reddit and 4Chan.

Searching for evidence of illegality or anything sinister in Podesta’s hacked emails, wannabe online sleuths decided that mentions of “pizza” were code for child pornography. An anonymous 4chan user posted a list of other supposed code words to search for in Podesta’s emails — “pasta” meant little boy, “ice cream” meant male prostitute, “sauce” meant orgy. Soon, the hashtag #Pizzagate appeared and spread like wildfire on social media.

James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 5, 2018.
James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong
Washington, D.C., on December 5th, 2018. 
Podesta claims he wasn’t overly concerned about his emails getting released: their contents, he now says, were “relatively much ado about nothing.” It wasn’t until after the election that he realized those emails had become fuel for a horrific conspiracy theory. In his career, he says he had never been on the receiving end of something like Pizzagate. “It’s painful and crazy,” he says. “I’m pretty grizzled. One big difference is you’ve got somebody sitting in the Oval Office stoking the conspiracy. That’s pretty different than what I’ve experienced in my years in politics.”

Podesta was only one strain of the conspiracy. Another thread formed around Alefantis and Comet Ping Pong. It appears to have begun with a 2008 email included in the WikiLeaks dump in which Alefantis asked Podesta if he would give a speech at an Obama fundraiser at Comet. From there, the trolls began mining every detail they could find about Alefantis and Comet, quickly concocting a parallel theory that said Alefantis, Podesta and Clinton ran a child sex-trafficking ring. Self-styled investigators claimed that symbols on Comet’s iconic sign (which had previously been used by a D.C. liquor store that had since closed) were linked to satanic rituals. They said a photo of an empty walk-in refrigerator was evidence of a secret kill room.

One day in November 2016, roughly a month before Welch’s attack, one of Alefantis’ young employees told him that a wild theory called Pizzagate was blowing up on Reddit. “What’s Reddit?” he asked.

Alefantis is a self-taught chef who never graduated from college and a self-made restaurateur well-known around Washington. (GQ named him one of D.C.’s 50 most powerful people in 2012.) He opened Comet more than a decade ago to be “a place of play and interaction,” as he puts it, where families could eat pizza and play ping pong and engage in real, substantive conversations with one another.

Alefantis told his staff that this Pizzagate thing would blow over after the election. Then Trump won, and the threats got worse. Violent messages poured into Comet’s Instagram and Facebook accounts, some of which Alefantis shared with Rolling Stone:

I will kill you personallyI truly hope someone blows your brains all over comet pizzaAre you scared yet? You should be motherfucker because were [sic] coming for youYou need to be raped killed and tortured like you do to children u sick fuck .. ur days of freedom are numbers u evil douche

The home addresses and phone numbers of Alefantis and his employees were published online. Comet would receive 150 menacing calls in a single day, Alefantis says, so he unplugged the phone. People reviewed Comet on Yelp and said there were chopped-up baby parts in their food.

As the threats became more violent, Alefantis repeatedly contacted the D.C. police and the FBI. He estimates he called the bureau three or four times and described a situation that, he admits, sounded insane. The FBI largely told him to call the police. “They were essentially like, ‘If you get a specific threat, let us know. Thank you, goodbye.'” When he asked what qualified as a specific threat, the FBI said, “A date and time when they’re going to come.” He says the local police visited Comet on multiple occasions but there was zero specific action taken by the police or the FBI as the threats escalated in the weeks after the election. (The FBI did not respond to a request for comment.)

At the same time the Pizzagaters barraged Comet, they attacked Alefantis personally. Strangers filmed his house and questioned his neighbors, he says. Any person or organization connected to him also got sucked in. A non-profit art gallery whose board he chaired received angry calls. Any trace of Alefantis’ life found in public records or social media — an old home address, an event he had attended — was used against him.

He came to see Pizzagate as a real-life video game played by the theory’s true believers. “These are people at home who want to investigate, and basically anything that’s available online is fair game to them,” Alefantis says. Sometimes, when he responded to the people making the threats, they would veer off into unexpected territory. “Some of those messages to me were, ‘How much do you pay your employees? Do you have health care?'” When he told them he did in fact offer health care, some responded, “Will you hire me?”

FILE - In this Dec. 4, 2016 file photo, Edgar Maddison Welch, 28 of Salisbury, N.C., surrenders to police in Washington. Welch, a man who police said was inspired by false internet rumors dubbed “pizzagate” to fire an assault weapon inside a Washington pizzeria pleaded guilty Friday, March 24, 2017, to two charges. (Sathi Soma via AP, File)
In this Dec. 4, 2016 file photo, Edgar Maddison Welch, 28 of Salisbury, N.C.,
 surrenders to police in Washington. Welch, a man who police said was inspired
 by false internet rumors dubbed “pizzagate” to fire an assault weapon inside a
Washington pizzeria pleaded guilty Friday, March 24, 2017, to two charges.
But the onslaught proved too much for him to handle on his own. Through a friend, he got in touch with Mike Gottlieb, a partner at the firm Boies Schiller Flexner. (David Boies, one of the firm’s founders, is the renowned litigator who has faced criticism for his work on behalf of Harvey Weinstein and the fraudulent blood-testing company Theranos.) Alefantis and Gottlieb met on a Friday in early December 2016, and Gottlieb agreed to take on Alefantis as a client. That Sunday, Welch walked into the restaurant, guns in tow. (Welch did not respond to Rolling Stone’s request for comment.)

Alefantis wasn’t at Comet but rushed over when he heard about the gunman. The neighborhood was a crime scene: there were SWAT officers and yellow tape everywhere, and police had evacuated Comet’s employees to a fire station down the street. The workers at Buck’s Fishing and Camping, another restaurant Alefantis owned on the same block as Comet, were locked inside for their safety, as were the other people who worked at nearby businesses. “I really hope that all these people fanning the flames of this conspiracy theory would take a moment to contemplate what has gone on today and maybe to stop,” Alefantis, still in shock, told reporters later that day.

At the urging of his new legal and P.R. team, Alefantis reopened Comet on Dec. 6th, two days after the attack. A long line of customers waited to get in, and he stood at the front door to personally welcome them. He recalls seeing one of his best friends from high school in line with her young kids. Months later, Alefantis and the friend talked about that day. “She said, ‘The look on your face was Don’t come here,'” he recalls. “I asked her, ‘How did you feel?’ She was like, ‘I did not want to go there. It was so terrifying for me.'” But her kids wanted to go and so she took them. “That trauma exists,” he says, “not just for me, but for a whole community of people.”
***
After Comet was back up and running, Alefantis and his lawyers set out to stop the spread of Pizzagate. “For me, at some point, I was like: My name is totally destroyed,” Alefantis says. “I just didn’t want anyone to come shoot us up again.”

The response from the social media companies ranged from helpful to utterly dismissive, Alefantis recalls. Even before he’d hired lawyers, Alefantis had gotten Yelp to suspend Comet’s page after his staff had reported the abusive reviews. Facebook was responsive to Comet’s complaints. YouTube, however, refused to so much as acknowledge its role in amplifying Pizzagate, saying they were just a platform, that they weren’t an arbiter of truth and falsity and told Alefantis to get back in touch if and when he could get a court order finding the videos that promoted Pizzagate to be defamatory.

“YouTube is a platform committed to allowing a wide range of free expression, but it is not and never has been anything goes,” a YouTube spokesperson tells Rolling Stone, adding that in the first half of 2018 the company removed more than 17 million individual videos that violated its policies.

The traditional crisis communications playbook proved useless. Media interviews and op-eds did nothing to quiet the conspiracists and, if anything, emboldened them. Alefantis’ lawyers and P.R. team booked him onto then-Fox News host Megyn Kelly’s show a few weeks after the attack. It didn’t help: Alefantis answered all of Kelly’s questions, but the interview just became more fodder.

 “We thought it was possible to show and tell the facts — to make sure that people could see with their own eyes that the crazy conspiracies were just false,” says Molly Levinson, a communications strategist who advised Alefantis. “But we quickly learned that in these kinds of situations any attention is bad attention, any public conversation becomes twisted and contorted and most likely has more of a negative than positive effect.”

The only real strategy, Alefantis realized, was a legal strategy. He would have to get aggressive with the loudest proponents of Pizzagate, people like Alex Jones, host of InfoWars, who had run multiple broadcasts with titles like “Pizzagate Is Real” and “Pizzagate: The Bigger Picture.”

Gradually, in the months after the gunman showed up, Jones and others seemed to bow to legal pressure and backed away from Pizzagate. On March 24th, 2017, Jones published online and read on-air a lengthy statement in which he apologized to Alefantis, announced that he had removed past broadcasts about Pizzagate and admitted that those stories were based on “an incorrect narrative.” Neither Alefantis nor his lawyers would further comment on any interactions with Jones or on any possible settlement.  

Podesta says he considered litigation as well. But suing the Pizzagaters would be extremely difficult given that he was a major public figure. He pushed back against the trolls on Twitter, but that didn’t make much difference, either. He found that the best course of action was doing nothing. “If I really spent my life trying to figure out what those people were saying, it would drive me nuts,” he says. “The only rational reaction to that is to deal with it when there’s something serious and right in front of you, but for the most part to try to ignore it.”

***

This past September, Alefantis traveled to New York City to attend a therapy session with his ex-boyfriend. Alefantis and his ex had broken up as Pizzagate was raging, but they had decided to see a therapist together. During their session, Alefantis assured his ex that, almost two years later, the nightmare had passed. “Things have moved on,” he recalls saying. “You’re safe. Everyone’s fine. It’s all over.”

After their session, they headed for the subway. A stranger approached Alefantis on the street and began taking pictures in his face and screaming at him.

“I’m going to my kid’s school right now!” the stranger said, apparently fearing for his child’s safety.
“Don’t engage, James,” his ex told him.

“Go call the police,” Alefantis said to the man, “and get the fuck away from me.”
Alefantis walked his ex to the subway station. The stranger followed Alefantis on foot before eventually leaving. “The guy’s basically chasing after me through the streets of New York,” he recalls. “He’s a Pizzagater. He recognized me. It still happens.”

Today, Alefantis says business at Comet is back to pre-Pizzagate levels. The angry phone calls and violent online threats have mostly subsided. You can still find plenty of disturbing tweets if you search for #Pizzagate or #CometPingPong on social media. But the worst of it appears to be over. Alefantis says he thinks the trolls just moved on to other things.

A restaurant in a smaller city, owned by someone with fewer connections, would’ve closed, he says. But the community of customers Alefantis had built up over the years rallied around him. Three brief phone calls and he had a meeting with one of the best attorneys in the country. “If this had been someone else or someone else’s restaurant, without 10 years of hard work and support behind us, without my understanding of how absurd the world can be and how difficult these things are, other people would have been taken down,” he says.

But the trauma remains. He’s been called the most despicable thing you can say to someone. Even in liberal circles, people jokingly refer to him as the Pizzagate guy. He’s figuring out what the ordeal means for his future. “Previous to this, I was out in the world and I had nothing but glowing Google hits and my restaurants were easily reviewed,” he says. “Now, it’s nothing but filth, basically. When I go into a business meeting or do a new venture or go into a new relationship with someone serious, there are major issues. It’s destroyed my name.”

Podesta, for his part, says Pizzagate seems to be largely over for him, to the extent online conspiracy theories ever really go away. He says his neighbors have chased away people walking up and down his block and acting suspiciously. After a Trump supporter sent pipe bombs to a number of prominent Democrats in October, Podesta resorted to poking and prodding his mail with a pen before opening it. President Trump still tweetsabout him, his messages amplified by an army of trolls at the ready. And the same backlash happens any time Podesta himself tweets about Trump, a move his staff has come to dread but something he won’t give up.

Pizzagate has left him with some pretty big scars, Podesta says, but he worries more about the victims of viral conspiracy theories who don’t have his thick skin. “As a person who’s pretty hardened by a lifetime in politics, I sometimes think, ‘Well, how would a normal person even begin to live with this?'”

Still, Podesta admits that the events of the past two years have left him less inclined to speak out. “You’re conscious about the notion that you are going to trigger a crazy response,” he says. “Sometimes you feel compelled to do it anyway. And I don’t do it for fun. I do it when I think something’s serious enough that I need to say something. And now I’m just a little bit more guarded it, and guarded about what appearances I accept.”

He catches himself from sounding too woe-is-me. “I’ve had the honor of working for a president,” he says. “I can’t bitch too much about my life. It’s been pretty good.”

“The pizza’s still good at Comet, too.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, July 8, 2018

A Letter From A Foster Kid To The Arkansas Judge Who Terminated His Parents Rights Through Child Welfare Fraud

This is a letter from a teenager to a judge in the Arkansas Child Welfare System.

I prefer to call it Trafficking of Tiny Humans Industry.

THE LETTER 

Honorable Judge Somewhere in Arkansas

I am writing this letter on behalf of myself and my little sister Rose, since she is only 9 years old.

Our case was closed over a year ago, so it's possible that you do not remember us. That is what first compelled me to write you this letter. With all due respect it seems very unfair that you can make a decision that ruined our lives, and then go on about yours as if we never existed. Since our voices were never heard during the court proceedings, the least you can do now is read my account of the truth and how the courts decisions have negatively affected me and Rose.... forever.

We sat quietly in the shadows and watched as the caseworkers, attorneys, counselors, and our ad litem all discussed with EACH OTHER issues that directly affected our lives, yet nobody was asking to hear from us. They never asked us what we wanted and ignored our wishes to go with one of our family members instead of Rose's Brownie leader. Even though we wanted to be with our mom, you should have at least let us be with our family while things were being looked at. That would have made it so much easier, but nobody listened. I think of those weeks and months often, trying to remember why I didn't speak up and demand to be heard and demand to go back with my mom where I always felt safe and loved. I suppose we were both in shock, we were scared, and completely out of our comfort zones, but mostly, I think then I trusted that a room full of lawyers, counselors, and a Judge, trained and college educated professionals, could be trusted to do their job, and get us back where we belonged.

You see, I thought that it was your duty to protect children, not to hurt them. In our case, you all failed at that. The only abuse that I have been subjected to is the abuse of this court who greatly abused it's power and the result of that will be something that me and Rose will have to live with our entire lives. All of you will go on to your normal lives but we can't do that. There was not one person in that courtroom truly advocating for us and wanted what was best for us. (except our mom who was strategically placed on the opposite side of he courtroom as if to suggest that she is the enemy) It was so hard watching the only person in the entire courtroom who truly loved us and knew what was best for us, being made to look like someone she wasn't. Caseworkers and our foster mom told lies about her to keep her from us even longer. I know, I was there. It wasn't right. It was so hard to sit and watch my mom, who drilled in our heads from the time I can remember to treat others how you would want to be treated, and now she was sitting there being treated horribly by you all. She just had to sit there, be quiet, and take it while her character was attacked time and time again.

And we found out later that she was told if she would just admit to things even if they weren't true instead of fighting them, then we could come home sooner. So, of course she did. But we are still not home. We may never get to go home and that's all I can think of everyday. It is apparent to me now that this court was never about what was best for me and my little sister. I'm not sure what it was about, but it wasn't about us.

If it was about the money you got for us, was it worth it? I sure hope so. Maybe you should have come over at night when Rose was crying for mom and I couldn't make her stop and then ask yourself if it was worth it then. Or come to my ball games where my mom was always my biggest fan, but now forbidden from going to my games, so her spot is empty. Usually nobody else goes either, but for some reason they don't want her there, so I have no family there cheering me on like my teammates do. I wish you would have got to really know who our mom is. She is our best friend. She was always volunteering at our school, giving the class parties, taking not only us, but usually a car full of kids to practice and games, to the movie and swimming and then give them all a ride home because their parents had other things to do.

And she never complained. She told me that there was no place she would rather be. Even when my parents split up and things were really hard for her, she never let us know how hard it was. She once carried my little sister at least two miles to her very first soccer game because the car broke down. She was not gonna let her miss that game and she make her think they were walking to get warmed up, even though she carried her the entire way. Rose had so much fun that she wanted her to carry her to the next game too, even though the car was fixed.

My mother never had anything bad around us like some of my friends moms do. She wouldn't even drink wine in front of us or smoke a cigarette and she didn't cuss for the first time until I was maybe 11 or 12 years old. We were never hungry, cold or scared and she never hurt us so why did you take us away. We can't even see our older brother and sister, none of our aunts, uncles or cousins that we have grown up with. It is our God given and Constitutional right to be able to be raised with our family, and our rights have been violated. So when all of you cash your checks, please think of me and Rose and ask yourself if it's worth it. P.S. They changed my little sister's name to Karen. She is 9 years old and they changed her entire name. She used to love listening to dad explain to us why we were named after flowers. It has been that way with all the women on his side of the family for over a century.

And all of our middle names start with a L.......Or at least they did. First our entire family was taken from us, now an attempt to take her identity. Just more evidence of where the true abuse is coming


Bob Goodlatte And The Mandela Effect: Why Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Funds Campaigns

Learn more: BEVERLY TRAN: Bob Goodlatte And The Mandela Effect: Why Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Funds Campaigns http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2017/07/bob-goodlatte-and-mandela-effect-why.html#ixzz5KiGLVZuz
Stop Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare 

Have a great day!

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, April 2, 2017

Happy Compassionate Human Trafficking Month (aka Child Welfare Propaganda)



Legally Kidnapped "The Baby LK Report" - 2012

It is time to break out with the pinwheels to raise awareness of child abuse and neglect!

Yes, that is correct, April is the month where the non-profit corporations will pump millions of tax payer dollars to promote the multi-billion dollar marketing industry of human trafficking in child welfare.

The video shows New Jersey officers working at the behest of Maryland Child Protective Services, without warrant, without court order. across state lines, to take a child.

But, it does not matter because this is April, the glorious month of child acquisition, in the name of abuse and neglect, whatever that means in this situation.

The officers are utilizing the age old, blanketed doctrine of exigent circumstances, meaning, "if someone thinks the child is in danger", they do not need warrant or order of the court.



It looks like there will be termination of parental rights.  I will provide updates.)

Once the child is removed and placed in foster care, all stakeholders, except the parents and family, will generate revenue of about $200,000 a year in Medicaid, Targeted Case Management cost reimbursements.

Foster parents will get paid.

Pedophiles will have a new product for child sex trafficking, because we all know, a state will run a background which will not produce any criminal history of child sex crimes as they have never been previously busted.

The courts will expend the federal funding to remain in operation.

Foster care and adoption agencies will keep their doors open and paychecks flowing, with a lovely adoption bonus at the end of the tunnel.

Adoptive parents will garner a substantial adoption tax subsidy.

The psychiatric and pharmaceutical industries will profit from scripting the kids for the trauma of being kidnapped and trafficked.

Schools will expand special needs programs, billed to Medicaid, to provide services for the kids who will more than likely never graduate from high school due to the trauma of being raped and tortured in foster care.

And, of course, I would be remiss if I did not mention that these privatized child welfare agencies operate in the name of the tax exempt christian God in order to fund political campaigns and pay dividends on the social impact bonds promoted by private equity firms.

So, in order to embolden the glorified practice of compassionate human trafficking, let us all pick up a pinwheel and the phone to call Child Protective Services, to create more jobs and stabilize the States economies.

As for the parents whose rights are terminated, well, there is always a profit to be generated in private prisons, organ harvesting or the other compassionate sectors in the industry of slave labor.



via GIPHY

Pinwheels!  Isn't human trafficking fun?

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, April 25, 2016

What Happens To Kids When Parents Get Locked Up?

So much for the successes of PRWORA and ASFA.

In the fight for justice reform, the Annie E. Casey Foundation has published the following report on the impact of welfare reform and criminal justice on child poverty of the last 24 years.

It is not good.

What is not mentioned in this report is the rate of incarceration of parents who cannot afford child support.

When a parent cannot afford to pay child support, they go to jail, even though jail is not the same as prison, it is still incarceration.

What other thing this report does not mention is that, through the promotion of the privatization of prisons, many are stripped of their right to vote in most states, as they have been convicted as a felon.

So where do many children go when a parent is incarcerated?

Foster care and adoption.  Yes, that is correct.  Children of the incarcerated are placed in an economic environment of poverty, leaving many children no choice but to approach the child welfare system, voluntarily, of course, to be reported as child abuse and neglect, for "failure to provide for the necessary needs of the child".

Poverty is the crime of child abuse.

The other kids, if lucky, will live with the one parent, a relative or on the streets.

In some situations, parental rights are terminated.

Guess who pays for child poverty?  You do.
As the U.S. prison population surged during the past several decades, so too did the number of children and families experiencing the consequences of having a loved one incarcerated. 
From 1980 to 2000, the number of kids with a father in prison or jail rose by 500 percent. 
Now more than 5 million children have had a parent incarcerated at some point in their lives, including 503,000 in California, 477,000 in Texas and 312,000 in Florida.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, February 26, 2016

House Democrats introduce Fair Day in Court for Kids Act


Click here to watch the press conference
WASHINGTON, D.C – Today, 54 House Democrats, led by U.S. Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Luis V. Gutiérrez (D- Ill.), and Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.), introduced new legislation – a companion to similar legislation in the U.S. Senate – to protect children and other vulnerable groups in immigration proceedings by ensuring access to counsel, legal orientation programs, and case management services.

The Fair Day in Court for Kids Act ensures due process for children and vulnerable individuals, and offers an alternative to ICE raids that risk sending individuals to dangerous countries where they face threats of violence, abuse, or even death.

The members were joined by U.S. Representatives John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), Alma Adams (D-N.C.), and Judy Chu (D-Calif.) at a press conference this morning to announce the new legislation.

Under current law, there is no right to appointed counsel in immigration removal proceedings, even if the respondent is a child.  Statistics show the overwhelming majority of children without attorneys are ordered deported while children with attorneys are five times more likely to be granted protection. Advocates assert that a child’s constitutional right to “due process” cannot be met without legal representation.

The Fair Day in Court for Kids Act:

  1. Requires the government to appoint counsel to children, and vulnerable individuals, including those with disabilities and victims of abuse, torture, or violence.
  2. Requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Attorney General to establish procedures to ensure that legal orientation programs are available to all detained immigrants.
  3. Creates a case management pilot project to increase court appearance rates.
  4. Requires DHS to submit reports to Congress on the number of individuals identified in the Act who were represented by counsel and the number of individuals who received legal orientation presentations.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Michigan Juvenile Justice Reform To Battle Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare

This is a powerful quote from the Michigan Catholic Conference report on the need for juvenile
Michigan child fighting the Binsfeld monster
justice reform:

"In the mid-1990s the state passed a series of punitive laws that funneled thousands of youth into the adult criminal justice system. In addition to automatically considering all 17-year-olds as adults, Michigan expanded the number of juvenile offenses requiring an adult sentence and allowed children of any age to be criminally convicted and sent to prison. From 2003–2013, for example, over 20,000 Michigan youth were placed on adult probation, detained in jail, or imprisoned for a crime committed under the age of 18. The majority of the cases were for nonviolent offenses; some were as young as 10 years old. A disproportionate number were minority youths."
These "series of punitive laws" were called the Binsfeld Legislation and became a national model for juvenile justice.

In a nutshell, the Binsfeld Legislation was designed to provide services to youth by putting them in foster care while simultaneously billing under juvenile justice; hence, the term "double-jackets".

Still in existence today, the only way children and youth with mental health needs could access services was through the lodging of a child protective services case.

Parents were tried as "guilty until proven innocent" without charges, never able to face their imaginary accusers, to the only outcome of termination of parental rights. 

Designating poverty as a failure of a parent's moral compass, children, particularly those who historically hail from economically disparaged populations, were snatched, without any due process, and placed under the auspices of the State, to eventually linger in a continuous state of pergatory, until the age of 18 when they aged out, or ran away.

This was the new juvenile justice population for the prison industrial complex to profit.

The purpose of this particular route was to open the flood gates to billing Medicaid, with no holds barred, with the sky's the limit, to become the most pervasive policy of child welfare the nation has ever experienced.

The Binsfeld Legislation was then difussed across the country.

BINSFIELD LEGISLATION PUBLIC HEALTH CODE 
(EXCERPT) Act 368 of 1978 333.6232 
Waiting list for services; placement of parent in priority position. Sec. 6232. 
(1) Subject to subsection (2), if a licensee under this part maintains a waiting list for services, the licensee shall place a parent whose child has been removed from the home under the child protection laws of this state or is in danger of being removed from the home under the child protection laws of this state because of the parent's substance abuse in a priority position on the waiting list above all other applicants with substantially similar clinical conditions. (2) If a licensee receives federal substance abuse prevention and treatment block grant funds, the priority position of the parent on the waiting list granted under subsection (1) will come after a priority position on the waiting list granted under the conditions of the federal block grant. However, if the parent qualifies for priority status on the waiting list under the conditions of the federal block grant, the licensee shall place the parent in that priority position on the waiting list. 
History: Add. 1997, Act 164, Eff. Mar. 31, 1998 

It is still in existence today.

With the freight train of privatization steamrolling throughout the States, with no one providing any substantive challenge to the legitimacy of services or billing policies, except for me, juvenile justice reform is going to be slow as Medicaid fraud in child welfare continues to thrive.

Until children are included in national discussions for criminal justice reform, nothing will ever change.

Changes may be coming to Michigan's juvenile justice system

The House Criminal Justice committee is scheduled to discuss the 20-bill package starting at 9 a.m. on Tuesday.

Among other things, the package of bills would bar housing youth offenders with adult convicts and raise the age of mandatory adult sentences.

The Michigan Catholic Conference has been a leading supporter for changes to the way the state handles juvenile offenders.

Dave Maluchnick is with the MCC.

“Move from just punishment to trying to rehabilitate an individual,” says Maluchnick. 

Maluchnick says studies show "get-tough-on-crime" policies haven’t worked.

Supporters say a side benefit of the proposals would mean lower costs for the Department of Corrections. 

The bills have bipartisan support in the Legislature, but as state lawmakers tackle a crowded legislative schedule before the end of the year, it’s possible the juvenile justice bills may struggle to move forward.   

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, May 18, 2015

Michigan's Dark Ages in Child Welfare

Michigan has a long and illustrious history of fraud in child welfare.

During the dark ages of Michigan Child Welfare, (1996 c, - present) Medicaid fraud grew to become the destructive monster lurking in the shadows of a regulatory environment which is non-existent. .

In Wayne County, in the early years of Michigan's dark ages, there was an Assistant Attorney General by the name of Jennifer Granholm who would prosecute child abuse cases over at Lincoln Hall of Justice.

One day, Prosecutor Granholm successfully advocated for the termination of parental rights for a young lady by the name of Starletta Banks

Starletta Banks had her parental rights terminated because, according to Assistant Attorney General Granholm, she had caused her child to have broken bones.

X-Rays were presented to support the charges.

Starletta Banks strongly denied the claims that she hurt her child.  She was so dedicated to prove she did not harm her child she realized the x-ray was that of a child much older than her child.  She began to investigate.

Starletta Banks began to make daily visits to the clerk's office in the basement of the Lincoln Hall of Justice to pull case files of parents who had filed appeals to their own termination of parental rights.

What she found was stunning.

Every case contained the exact same evidence to support the termination of parental rights.  It was the exact same x-ray used to terminate her parental rights and put her children up for adoption.

I saw the files, too, but I took my investigation a step further and discovered Michigan's horrific practice of Medicaid fraud in child welfare.

Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Granholm eventually became Governor and gloriously ruled over the apex of the dark ages in Michigan's child welfare where many children were repeatedly raped, tortured, attempted suicide multiple times, experienced numerous heart attacks and starved.

She knew about it.  She did nothing about it.

Special Report: Shadow of Doubt


CALHOUN COUNTY, Mich. (NEWSCHANNEL 3) - An I-Team investigation uncovers the child abuse convictions of dozens of people in Michigan are now being called into question.

And the tragic death of a three-year-old little girl has opened up new conversations about whether innocent people are sitting in prisons for crimes they did not commit.

The calls to 9-1-1 her family made July 28, 2011 give a glimpse into the last hours of 3-year-old Baylee Stenman's life.

"And what happened," the operator asks. "She bumped her head," says the caller.

Now, four years later Leo Ackley is in prison for her murder. But there are new questions about his guilt.

"Just being here is embarrassing, the crime itself, obviously nobody wants to be labeled as that," Ackley told us by phone from jail.

Ackley, who was dating Baylee's mother at the time, is now serving a life sentence without parole. But his family says what he's accused of never made sense.

"Him being innocent, I never believed you could convict an innocent person and they have found a way to do so and apparently more than just my child," says Ackley's mother Linda Byrd.

Ackley's case is now in front of the Michigan Supreme Court which is deciding if he should get a new trial.

"Leo's case is almost a 100% classic shaken baby, abusive head trauma type case. No witnesses witnessed any abuse, all the evidence is established by medical testimony," says Ackley's attorney Andrew Rodenhouse.

Calhoun County Medical Examiner Joyce deJong testified at trial that Baylee died from severe head trauma and ruled she was murdered.

But Ackley's family and Rodenhouse have cast doubts on that determination, and asked another doctor to review the medical records who says the injuries most likely happened from an accidental fall.

Rodenhouse says this case is shining a spotlight in Michigan on shaken baby cases, also now called abusive head trauma cases.

Since the 1970's if a medical examiner saw a child had three injuries, swelling of the brain, bleeding on the surface of the brain and bleeding in the eyes, they automatically ruled the child was murdered.

"What we've learned is actually there are a lot of causes for those symptoms, both accidental and diseases. There's just a lot of questions now about how accurately we can diagnose shaken baby syndrome or abusive head trauma," says Caitlin Plummer with the Michigan Innocence Clinic.

The highly regarded Innocence Clinic in Ann Arbor has been advocating for Ackley and is now looking into a dozen other child abuse cases in Michigan including two more in Calhoun County.

But despite the uncertainty behind it, prosecutors and medical examiners are still using the shaken baby diagnosis to put people behind bars.

"Even if you didn't have any criminal record, or any history of abuse, if you were the last one with this baby, the baby collapses and the baby has these three symptoms, there's a very good chance you're going to be accused of abusing the baby," says Plummer.

"The only evidence they had, basically to me, was that I was the last one with him, and I took him to the hospital," says Sean Brown who was convicted of killing his own son in 2010.

The I-Team has confirmed Brown's conviction in Calhoun County is one the Innocence Clinic is looking into. Prosecutors claimed Brown shook his child causing severe head injuries.

"I would just hope that in my case, the truth comes out, that I'm an innocent person and I find out what happened to my son," says Brown.

Sources tell us the Innocence Clinic is also looking into the Calhoun County case of Tonia Miller, who was convicted in 2001 of killing her eleven-week-old daughter.

Calhoun County Prosecutor David Gilbert declined to interview with us on this issue because he said he had some of these types of cases currently being appealed.

But Kalamazoo prosecutor Jeff Getting says attitudes are changing.

"I suspect there's going to be a lot of litigation over this and rightfully so. The law evolved, medicine evolves, this isn't 1985 and we shouldn't ignore what we've learned since then," says Getting.

Dr. deJong is also the medical examiner for several other counties, including Kalamazoo.

Just last year in a case similar to Ackley's in Wexford County, deJong ruled 19- month old Kalla Fisher's head injuries showed she was murdered, her father David Ferris was arrested.

But the case was thrown out after other doctors reviewed the case. One of them was the Oakland County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. L.J. Dragovic, who wrote, "the leap to such a conclusion is a result of an incomplete and inadequate assessment… in this case."

"When you have a forensic pathologist that is just so stuck on their side and is unwilling to consider there is an alternate causation to these types of injuries it's really hard to hold them as being a true expert," says attorney Andrew Rodenhouse.

"If this is what had to happen for prosecutors to stop doing this, then he'll accept it that he was the reason, that this all gets squashed. Nobody else can get accused or convicted or sent to prison," says Leo Ackley's mother Linda Byrd.

Dr. deJong, Calhoun County Medical Examiner sent this statement Tuesday: "I am not aware of "many" cases and convictions unraveling. Our approach to the investigation of the sudden and unexpected death of anyone, including children, is methodical and based upon national standards. I have never thought that abusive head trauma could be determined solely on what you describe as "the traditional three indicators of swelling of the brain, bleeding on the surface of the brain and bleeding in the eyes". These findings may exist in children with injuries inflicted by another, but they may also be found in accidental trauma. Differentiating accidental injuries and natural disease processes from inflicted injuries is significantly more complicated and involved than simple recognition of brain swelling, hemorrhage and retinal hemorrhage. Our practice has always been to complete thorough investigations in to the circumstances of the death, evaluate for natural diseases and injuries, consult experts in forensic neuropathology, and after evaluating all information available, determine the cause and manner of death. Efforts by reputable organizations to ascertain convictions are appropriate are valuable to our society."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, July 15, 2013

Michigan Court Overturns MCI Termination of Parental Rights

This case was dealing with a decision of Bill Johnson, Superintendent of Michigan Children's Institute.

This case also dealt with the Interstate Compact on the Placement of a Child of which Bill Johnson finds repugnant to his omnipotence.


Regarding In the Matter of Clarmont, Minors; a respondent appealed as of right termination of her parental rights under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g), and (j). The Court of Appeals opinion is dated February 19, 2013. The lower court is the Wayne County Juvenile Division.
First, the respondent had an expected prison release date within a span of only five months. In establishing grounds for termination, the petitioner wholly relied upon the respondent’s criminal history and substance abuse (which occurred before the commencement of the child protection hearings); the fact that she was imprisoned; and also the difficulties she would face after her release date.
However, In re Mason held that imprisonment with a possible release date in less than two years plus the respondent having a criminal history are not alone sufficient grounds for termination under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g), and (j) except under specific circumstances not implicated in this case. In Mason, the Court found significant factors like the respondent maintaining contact with his children through the exchange of cards through the mail; the respondent also engaged in prison services; and he lined up housing and employment for after  his release from imprisonment.
In the instant case, the respondent was required to have a relative sponsor in the state to acquire an interstate compact and transfer of her probation to Michigan. Due to this, the respondent had not yet arranged housing that would enable her to care for her children. Furthermore, an unknown factor was whether respondent would be able to find post-release employment and housing.
Yet, similar to Mason, the respondent completed all available prison services including parenting classes. Moreover, the respondent sent monthly letters to her children. A corrections officer even testified that the respondent did not exhibit any serious behavioral issues in prison—and that she earned all available good time. Notably, the respondent had a nonviolent criminal history that was not directly related to her parenting ability as well. Only limited evidence was introduced by the petitioner pertaining to the respondent’s parenting ability prior to incarceration. Moreover, the caseworker admitted to not evaluating the respondent’s current parenting skills either.
The Court of Appeals found the termination premature under Mason. The trial court clearly erred in finding statutory grounds for termination. Therefore, the case was reversed and remanded.
Also, the Court stated the children should be temporary wards of the court while reunification or termination efforts are ongoing with more information required concerning the respondent’s ability to provide proper care to her children in a reasonable time after her release from prison. Additionally, the Court noted that separation related to the imprisonment weakened the child/parent bond, and that the children would benefit from permanence. Therefore, the lower court did not clearly err in its best-interest determination.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©