Showing posts with label electoral college. Show all posts
Showing posts with label electoral college. Show all posts

Monday, October 12, 2020

The 2020 Election Is Definitely Going To Be Contested - Tyler Ignored FBI To Cover Up Electoral College Gerrymandering

Q: Why did Tyler Technologies pay the ransomware?

A: Because they and their co-conspirators did not want to be uncloaked for interfering in the 2020, 2018, 2016, 2014, 2012, 2010 Electoral College, but, hey, what do I know?


Always remember, the President is elected through the Electoral College, not the Popular Vote, so be a part of this historic investigation and go vote, we need the data.

#maytheheavensfall

Tyler Technologies finally paid the ransom to receive the decryption key

Tyler Technologies has finally decided to paid a ransom to obtain a decryption key and recover files encrypted in a recent ransomware attack.

Tyler Technologies, Inc. is the largest provider of software to the United States public sector. At the end of September, the company disclosed a ransomware attack and its customers reported finding suspicious logins and previously unseen remote access tools on their networks.

The ransomware attack took place on September 23, the threat actors breached the network of the company and deployed the malware.

Tyler notified law enforcement and hired a forensics firm to investigate the incident and determine the extent of the incident.

Immediately after the attack company representatives declared that the incident only impacted the internal network and phone systems.
Some reports circulating online speculate the company was infected with the RansomExx ransomware.

The RansomEXX is human-operated ransomware, this means that attackers manually infected the systems after gained access to the target network.

In June 2020, the same ransomware was employed in an attack on the Texas Department of Transportation, in September it infected the systems at the IPG Photonics high-performance laser developer.

According to BleepingComputer, which cited a source informed on the event, Tyler Technologies paid a ransom of an unspecified amount to receive the decryption key and recover encrypted files.
“When the ransomware encrypted Tyler Technologies’ files, they appended an extension similar to ‘.tylertech911-f1e1a2ac.'” reported BleepingComputer.

“To prove that the decryptor was valid, BleepingComputer was able to decrypt encrypted files [1, 2] uploaded to VirusTotal at the time of the ransomware attack.”

When decrypted, the Arin.txt file contained a list of IP ranges used by the company.

Experts pointed out that many school districts, court systems, and local and statement governments in the United States uses Tyler Technologies software, this means that the disclosure of data stolen during the ransomware attack could have serious consequences.

For this reason, the company decided to pay the ransom.


How to Respond and Report 

The FBI does not support paying a ransom in response to a ransomware attack. Paying a ransom doesn’t guarantee you or your organization will get any data back. It also encourages perpetrators to target more victims and offers an incentive for others to get involved in this type of illegal activity. 

If you are a victim of ransomware:


I wonder if this is in any shape or form related because I had a very difficult time figuring it out.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, September 29, 2020

The Tale Of The Electoral College: The Predictive Modeling Crappers Of Tyler Are Not Having A Very Good Lead Up To The Presidential Election - "Drats, Hacked Again"

Tyler Technologies is not in a happy place at the moment, but I am having a schadenfreude moment, so it does not matter.

Now, I want to know about these databases and if there are any land patents with fancy financial instruments associated, because this is what I call some serious gerrymandering, because you know you have to have your human asset management databases up to date before you run your magical plans for the outcome of an election, at least 30 days before the election, to make sure you got your psephological, resegregationary #coloredrevolution fairy talking points polished.

NOTE TO SELF: COME UP WITH A MODERN SOOTHESAYING AI TERM FOR GERRYMANDERING & ITS DIRTY DATA CENSUS OPS

Suspicious logins reported after ransomware attack on US govt contractor

Ransomware attack on Tyler Technologies is looking worse by the day.

Customers of Tyler Technologies, one of the biggest software providers for the US state and federal government, are reporting finding suspicious logins and previously unseen remote access tools (RATs) on their networks and servers.

The reports come days after Tyler Technologies admitted last week to suffering a ransomware attack.

The Texas-based company said that an intruder gained access to its internal network on the morning of Wednesday, September 23.

The intruder installed ransomware that locked access to some of the company's internal documents.

Tyler initially played down the incident

Tyler played down the incident and said that only its internal corporate network and phone systems were impacted.

Its cloud infrastructure, where the company hosts its customer-facing applications, was not impacted, the company said in a statement published on its website and via emails sent to customers last week.

But over the weekend, the situation changed as Tyler made headway investigating the incident. The company changed its statement on Saturday.

"Because we have received reports of several suspicious logins to client systems, we believe precautionary password resets should be implemented," the company said.

"If clients haven't already done so, we strongly recommend that you reset passwords on your remote network access for Tyler staff and the credentials that Tyler personnel would use to access your applications, if applicable." [emphasis Tyler's]

Customers report remote access tools on their servers

At the same, some of Tyler's customers also reported seeing new software installed on their systems.

"If you're a Tyler customer check your servers for Bomgar that they installed," wrote one of many users on Reddit over the weekend.

A similar report followed on Monday from cyber-security training outfit SANS.

"One of our readers, a Tyler Technologies's customer, reported to us that he found this morning the Bomgar client (BeyondTrust) installed on one of his servers," said Xavier Mertens, one of the SANS ISC handlers.

According to users, Tyler uses the Bomgar client to manage its servers, but some reports claim the software was not installed prior to this weekend, prompting some to panic.

While Tyler insists in its updated statement that the attack was aimed at its internal system, customers now believe attackers might have gained access to passwords for Tyler's web-hosted infrastructure that were stored on the company's local network — and attackers are now escalating access to Tyler's client networks.

While the Tyler Technologies name might not say anything to the regular American, the ransomware attack on this company's network might quietly become one of the biggest cyber-attacks of the year, if indeed attackers gained access to passwords for customer networks and the Reddit and SANS reports aren't isolated cases.

According to its website, Tyler provides more than 50 types of web-based applications to the US public sector, such as student and school management software, public transport management solutions, jail management, courts and jury management systems, cyber-security solutions, tax and billing software, fire and EMS solutions, and entire city staff management systems, known as "Munis," just to name a few.

According to Reuters, which first broke the story about the ransomware attack, some of Tyler's software is also scheduled to be used in the upcoming US presidential election — for aggregating voting results from other sources into central dashboards."

The gang behind the Tyler attack was identified as the RansomExx group.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Government software provider Tyler Technologies hit by ransomware

Leading government technology services provider Tyler Technologies has suffered a ransomware attack that has disrupted its operations.

Tyler Technologies is one of the largest U.S. software development and technology services companies dedicated to the public sector.

With a forecasted $1.2 billion in revenue for 2020 and 5,500 employees, Tyler Technologies provides technical services for local governments in many states in the USA.

Starting earlier today, Tyler Technologies' website began to display a maintenance message, and their Twitter account tweeted that they were having technical difficulties.

In an email seen by BleepingComputer, Tyler Technologies CIO Matt Bieri emailed clients stating that they are investigating a cyberattack and have notified law enforcement.

"I am writing to make you aware of a security incident involving unauthorized access to our internal phone and information technology systems by an unknown third party. We are treating this matter with the highest priority and working with independent IT experts to conduct a thorough investigation and response."

"Early this morning, we became aware that an unauthorized intruder had disrupted access to some of our internal systems. Upon discovery and out of an abundance of caution, we shut down points of access to external systems and immediately began investigating and remediating the problem. We have since engaged outside IT security and forensics experts to conduct a detailed review and help us securely restore affected equipment. We are implementing enhanced monitoring systems, and we have notified law enforcement," Bieri stated in an email to clients.

Bieri also stated that current investigations indicate that the attack was limited to Tyler Technologies' local network.

In posts to the Municipal Information Systems Association of California (MISAC) forum shared with BleepingComputer, local government employees were told that Tyler Technologies suffered a ransomware attack affecting their phone ticketing system and support systems.

"We were told this morning from one of the support techs that they got hit with ransomware early this morning on their corporate networks. Don't have any other details at this point other than support is down until they access their systems," one local municipality employee posted to the MISAC forum.

Another MISAC user stated that they heard the attack was limited to Tyler Technologies' internal network and did not affect clients.

If you have first-hand information about this or other unreported cyberattacks, you can confidentially contact us on Signal at +16469613731 or on Wire at @lawrenceabrams-bc.

Tyler technologies hit by RansomExx ransomware
Cybersecurity sources familiar with the attack told BleepingComputer that Tyler Technologies suffered an attack by the RansomExx ransomware.
 
RansomExx is a rebranded version of the Defray777 ransomware and has seen increased activity since June when they attacked the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), Konica Minolta, and most recently IPG Photonics.

While BleepingComputer has not obtained the ransom note, we found an encrypted file uploaded to VirusTotal today related to this attack.

This encrypted file has an extension of '.tylertech911-f1e1a2ac,' which includes Tyler Technologies' name and is the same format used in other RansomExx attacks.

RansomExx does not have a ransomware data leak site, but that does not mean they do not steal unencrypted files before deploying their ransomware.

BleepingComputer has contacted Tyler Technologies with further questions but has not received a response.

Thx to Fate112 for the tip!

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, September 28, 2020

The Tale Of The Electoral College: Tyler Technologies Is Not Havin A Very Good Week With Its Crappy Predictive Modeling Electoral College Databases

Tyler Technologies is not having a very good week.

Wanna know why?

Because, "She was hoisted by her own petard, again."

IDIOTS!

Meet the Electoral College Corporate Parent of the vote, because in order to vote, one must live in the
National Governors Association

geopolitical district, which is administrated by SOCRATA, like all the municipal property taxes, and county registry of deeds, and court records, and school records, and Medicaid fraud in child welfare records, which are used through the certification process of the vote, to generate a finding on the Electoral College votes for a POTUS.

So, that would mean if there was a situation of fake ass property taxes, fake ass foreclosures, fake ass bankruptcy, fake ass Detroit Land Bank Authority, running some fake ass public and private mortgage fraud schemes in the name of the tax exempt lord, there would definitely not be found any corruption in the chain of command of the record when it comes to the chain of command of the certification of the election, in a situation of more illegitimate certifiers, covering up all the mean things they did to my Sweetie, because something like that would just jack the entire 2016 Presidential Election Algorithm, right?

National Conference of State Legislatures

 U.S. Presidential Elections are based on the Electoral College, not the popular vote, which is why the issue is election interference.

They negotiate who wins before the vote.

But, when those wily plans go awry, we have a serious question ask ourselves"

"When will Trump stop obstructing justice and pull that IG Report from his backpocket?"

#maytheheavensfall

Tyler Technologies: Ransomware Locked Our Network, But Election Info Not At Risk

In a late Friday afternoon update to the single page of attack information that now passes for Tyler Technologies’ website, the company admitted to being hit by ransomware, but insisted customers were safe.

Tyler Technologies has copped to the ransomware attack that still has the company’s phone lines and website off line.

In an update to its online statement, Plano, Texas-based Tyler confirmed that early Sept. 23 it was hit with ransomware. It did not specify which variant was used against its network.

The company -- No. 46 on the 2019 CRN Solution Provider 500 -- is sticking by its claims that the only portion of its system that was attacked was the internal network used by Tyler Technologies employees, as well as the telephone systems.

Tyler said addressing this with clients is the company’s “highest priority.”

“We are deploying every resource at our disposal, both internal and external, to take whatever steps are needed to return to business as usual,” the company said. “We are committed to doing that in a responsible, deliberate way, and we are laser-focused on those efforts.”

Tyler said it has been in contact with the FBI “and we are cooperating with them.”

The attack on Tyler Technologies is setting off alarm bells in the security community, not just because it is yet another ransomware attack this year against a massive solution provider, but because the company’s website and phone system remains down.

Kyle Hanslovan, CEO of Huntress Labs, said solution providers that are Tyler’s size typically have network redundancies built in, meaning the phone systems and website should be restorable quickly. The fact that the site has not yet come back online, likely means Tyler does not know the extent of the intrusion.

“It’s concerning. Redundancies are hard. Redundancies are expensive, but they should be part of any company’s resiliency plan,” he said. “They could be one of these companies that is very operationally mature when it comes to sales and products, but inside their network it is a house of cards.”

A call to Tyler’s spokeswoman could not be routed through the switchboard, an operator who picked up the phone yesterday said.

“We’re still having problems with the phones,” she said. In an email, a spokesperson directed CRN to an update on the website. Tyler’s website – which was offline following the attack – has been replaced by a single-page statement about the ransomware attack, a part of which insists that none of its clients’ systems were accessed.

“Based on all of the evidence gathered to date through our around-the-clock response efforts, all information available to us continues to indicate that this incident is limited to Tyler‘s internal corporate environment and does not impact the separate environment where we host client systems,” the statement reads. “ We have disconnected points of access between Tyler’s internal systems and our client systems to further protect our clients.”

The company also said its internal payroll systems are part of a separate system and were also not hit.

However, Hanslovan said it is very difficult for the best security forensics to determine how far-reaching an attack was, even weeks afterwards. At best, those reports will only indicate “high confidence” that an attack did not spread beyond the area that it impacted.

Tyler Technologies serves 15,000 customers around the world, but focuses primarily on state and local government customers. The company offers dozens of solutions for courts, police, EMS, fire department, probation, as well as resourced to pay parking tickets and water bills.

The company bought Socrata, an advanced AI platform in 2018, which extracts information from municipal systems giving decision makers actionable datasets used in urban planning. A part of that includes data from elections departments, raising the concern that ransomware actors could be attempting to tamper with elections.

The company said the Socrata system is housed on an AWS server and has not been touched.

“Based on all of the evidence gathered to date through our around-the-clock response efforts, all information available to us continues to indicate that this incident is limited to Tyler‘s internal corporate environment and does not impact the separate environment where we host client systems. In addition, our Socrata platform is hosted offsite on AWS (Amazon Web Services), and our Tyler Federal Entellitrak and Tyler Cybersecurity platforms are maintained in entirely separate environments. There is no evidence of any impact on those environments whatsoever.

The company also insisted that none of its products are used in voting. The Socrata system reads the information that is provided.

“None of our products is a system of record for voting or any other election- or voting-related activities. Users of our open data solution may use our platform to post aggregated information about election returns, or to provide information about polling stations and campaign finance, but Tyler does not store individual voting records. Our open data solution is hosted offsite on AWS, not on Tyler‘s internal network that was impacted.”

The company also disputed some online comments that its utility bill payment systems used by cities and towns was having trouble following the outage.

“Tyler‘s Online Services and Support teams have reviewed all the logs, monitoring, traffic reports, volume reports, and cases related to utility and court payments,” the company said. “There were no outages with any of our online payment systems and payment activity has functioned normally during this time.”

Brett Callows, a threat analyst at Emsisoft, said the looming U.S. election, and the danger posed by ransomware to municipal systems, regardless of vendor, is real.

“The threat ransomware groups present cannot be overstated,” he said. “They’re using APT-level tools and techniques to successfully attack - and extract data from - courts, government agencies, companies in the Defence Industrial Base sector, financial institutions and public and private entities in multiple other sectors. These incidents could potentially be a risk to national security, economic security and, of course, election security.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, September 3, 2020

Prelude To Detroit: Hillary Clinton Speaks Upon Detroit 2020 Primary Election

This happens every election cycle.

Someone files a complaint about the election.

The complaint is ignored.

The election is certified.

#maytheheavensfall

'This can't go on': Detroit primary ballots went unchecked, GOP poll challengers say

Election workers in Detroit's primary improperly altered some votes and counted thousands of absentee ballots without checks against voter lists, say GOP poll challengers who contend Michigan's largest city isn't ready for November's election.

An affidavit signed by Bob Cushman describes what he saw while serving as a poll challenger at Detroit's primary election at the TCF Center on Aug. 4, 2020.Detroit, where problems counting ballots have been in the spotlight for at least 15 years, is quickly becoming a key front in the political fight over election integrity. Republicans are signing affidavits about problems they saw in the Aug. 4 primary, while Democratic state officials are taking steps they hope will improve ballot handling in the general election.

About 25 Michigan Republicans monitored the counting of absentee ballots in the basement of the TCF Center in Detroit for the Aug. 4 primary. They reported a variety of missteps that — if accurate — would violate policies in state manuals, ranging from cellphones being used by workers to votes being counted without lists of voters on hand to check the ballots against, according to interviews with eight poll challengers and signed affidavits from five.

A handful of the GOP poll challengers contended that they saw election workers make digital changes to disregard lone Republican votes on ballots featuring mostly Democratic votes in a bid to make the ballots legally countable in the partisan primary, where voters are not allowed to cross over.

Their accounts come after Wayne County election officials revealed that 72% of Detroit's 503 absentee voting precincts reported ballot totals that didn't match the totals of voters tracked in poll books, the official lists of voters participating in the election. The out-of-balance totals, which could have resulted from not checking ballots against the voter lists, would mean that the precincts couldn't be recounted in a close race under state law.

GOP poll challenger Cliff Frost, 73, of Warren said he was "incredulous" to see ballots sent to tabulators without first being checked against poll books as election workers are supposed to do in accordance with state manuals.

Frost said election workers told him: "We’re saving the envelopes, and we’re going to check them later." But he questioned what would happen if the workers found a problem after the votes had already been counted.

A portion of an affidavit by Janice Brines describes what she saw at the TCF Center where absentee ballots were counted for Detroit's primary on Aug. 4, 2020.


With a surge of absentee voting expected this fall, the Nov. 3 election is going to be "a mess" in Detroit, predicted Matt Harris, 41, of Commerce Township, another Republican poll watcher.

"They have September and October, two months," Harris said of the time remaining before the election. "How can they turn it around that fast?”

Election officials in Michigan have emphasized the problems in Detroit's primary election weren't examples of fraud and don't call into question the integrity of the results.

Detroit Clerk Janice Winfrey, whose office didn't respond to multiple requests for comment, has tied the problems to increases in absentee voting, veteran election workers not showing up during the COVID-19 pandemic and other workers being on the job for more than 20 hours.

There are security precautions for absentee ballots, such as checking signatures on them, that can be done before Election Day, said Aghogho Edevbie, Michigan director for the voting rights group All Voting Is Local. While Edevbie said he's concerned about the processes used in Detroit's primary, he said he doesn't think something nefarious went on.

"The essential integrity of the process was not breached," he said.

The GOP allegations come as the eyes of the nation could be on Detroit this fall amid record absentee voting and criticism from President Donald Trump about mail-in voting. Trump won Michigan by 10,704 votes in 2016, his closest margin of victory nationally.

Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate, referenced the Republican poll challengers during an interview with TV show "The Circus" last month in which she advised Joe Biden, the 2020 Democratic candidate, not to concede the election. She described the GOP challengers as "lawyers" and said a local reporter was told their presence was a "dry run" for November.

"Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out and, eventually, I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is," Clinton said.

Skipping ballot books
In a basement room beneath the TCF convention center, hundreds of election workers met in the morning hours of the Aug. 4 primary to begin counting Detroit's absentee ballots.

Tables were set up in squares for each of the more than 130 county boards that would handle the city's 503 absentee voting precincts. Robert Brines, 69, of White Lake, one of the GOP poll challengers, described it as a "monster operation."

The election workers were on the job until about 5 a.m. Aug. 5, the day after the primary. Of the eight Republicans who monitored the work and were interviewed by The Detroit News, none stayed at TCF Center longer than Bob Cushman, a 70-year-old General Motors retiree from South Lyon.

An affidavit signed by Bob Cushman describes what he saw while serving as a poll challenger at Detroit's primary election at the TCF Center on Aug. 4, 2020.

Cushman arrived at the TCF Center at 6:50 a.m. Aug. 4 and didn't leave until 5:10 a.m. Aug. 5, according to an affidavit he signed later. While at the facility, he took five pages of notes, which documented election workers not checking absentee ballots against poll books, a practice that is meant to help keep ballot and voter totals in balance.

An affidavit describes what William Lethemon says he saw while working as a poll challenger for Detroit's primary election on Aug. 4, 2020.

At about 2 a.m. on Aug 5, a "soft male voice" came over the microphone system in the center and "instructed everyone to stop what they are doing, open every envelope, separate the ballots and place them in the trays to go to the tabulators," according to Cushman's affidavit. Another announcement repeated the instruction a few moments later, he said.

"About 20 minutes after the announcements, I walked around the TCF Center and noted that there were no more comparisons being made to the poll books at any of the tables that I observed," Cushman said in his affidavit. "I continued to make rounds of the floor with the same observations."

The retiree estimates thousands of absentee ballots were sent to tabulators without being checked against voter lists after the 2 a.m. announcement in an effort to get results more quickly.

"This was just a primary," he said. "There’s going to be a lot more votes, many, many more votes in the general election."

Most other GOP poll challengers said they saw absentee ballots being sent to tabulators without poll book checks earlier on Aug. 4 when counting boards didn't yet have their poll books on site.

Some of the counting boards, which can handle counts for multiple precincts, didn't have poll books until 3 p.m., according to the GOP poll challengers.

"The supervisors were called and seemed shocked, but the workers already admitted that they were told to process the ballots, even without a poll book," said an affidavit from GOP poll challenger Janice Brines of Oxford.

The first steps for counting absentee ballots should involve checking the voter's name in the poll book or qualified absentee voter list, according to Michigan's official manual for absentee voter counting boards. It's an accounting measure that is supposed to help election workers track who's voted and ensure that the number of ballots counted in a specific precinct matches the number of voters.

"You need your poll book. That’s how you begin," said Chris Thomas, who served as Michigan's election director for more than 30 years and is advising Detroit elections operations this fall. "That tells you how many ballots are supposed to be there."

But Detroit was short dozens of election workers for the primary, according to a variety of sources, including Evelyn Archer of Oxford, another Republican poll challenger. Some workers didn't show up. Others left early.

"This can’t go on,” Archer said of the primary problems. “This is not representing the true vote.”

Chris Thomas
'Far cry' from disaster?
On Wednesday, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, the state's top election official, and Detroit Clerk Winfrey said they would partner to administer the election in Detroit this fall.

The effort will include recruiting and training at least 6,000 election workers and revising protocols for ballot counting and sorting to "reduce the potential for error," according to a press release.

New technology played a role in the problems in Detroit's primary, said Thomas, now a special adviser on Detroit's upcoming election. But under his analysis of precinct results, in which some precincts were allocated more votes than expected and others were allocated fewer, the citywide totals left only about 21 votes unaccounted for, he said earlier this week in an interview. More than 121,200 ballots were cast.

"That’s a far cry from major disaster," Thomas said.

Asked how concerned voters should be about Detroit's situation this fall, he answered clerks across Michigan are making adjustments to deal with record absentee ballots.

Detroit's previous high for absentee votes in an election was about 57,000, Thomas said. In the Aug. 4 primary, the city had about 80,000 absentee ballots cast, he said. It reflects about a 40% jump.

More will be cast in the upcoming general election during a pandemic and after voters approved a constitutional amendment allowing no-reason absentee voting in 2018.

“Every clerk is dealing with a pandemic situation," Thomas said. "There’s concern across the board in terms of them having the people and resources they need to get the job done. Detroit is no different."

Current Michigan elections director Jonathan Brater told the Michigan Board of State Canvassers on Wednesday that efforts in Detroit will focus on improving record-keeping and the accuracy of poll books.

"Because of the issues with recording ballots in the poll books along with the fact that ballots were in some cases put in the wrong containers, that made it very difficult for the city and the county to balance things out in the time they had available," Brater said.

Recount impact looms
More than a quarter of Detroit's absentee voting precincts, or 131 of 503 precincts, were off by plus or minus one ballot without an explanation for Aug. 4 primary when comparing poll books to ballot totals, according to information presented to the Wayne County Board of Canvassers.

Another 85 absentee precincts were off by two ballots without an explanation, 48 were off by three ballots, 26 off by four ballots and 73 off by five ballots. In Michigan, precincts with tallies that are off without explanations can't be recounted.

When totals are out of balance and votes can't be recounted, people will question what actually happened, said state Sen. Ruth Johnson, R-Holly, a former secretary of state.

"Something has to be done. It’s not just one city. This happens in a number of places," Johnson said.

Ruth Johnson
But the problems aren't new in Detroit. In 2016, election officials there couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 59% of precincts — combined Election Day and absentee precincts. For the Aug. 4 primary 46% of the total precincts couldn't be reconciled.

The poll book checks weren't the only problems, according to Republican challengers.

Multiple poll observers said they saw Detroit election workers digitally clear improper cross-over votes in the Democratic primary that should have made partisan portions of the ballots invalid. "Three or four times" Robert Brines said he saw election workers remove Democratic primary voters' choice of Republican U.S. Senate candidate John James.

"Some of the operators and observers were correcting an overvote when the ballot should be voided by the system software," an affidavit signed by Robert Brines said.

An affidavit describes what William Lethemon says he saw while working as a poll challenger for Detroit's primary election on Aug. 4, 2020.
Watching the counters
Michigan Republicans plan to closely monitor Detroit's vote-counting in November as President Donald Trump seeks reelection in a state he won by 10,704 votes in 2016.

Trump has argued, without evidence, that the efforts to expand absentee voting during the COVID-19 pandemic "will be the most rigged election in our nation's history." In July, he refused to commit to accepting the results of the election in advance of Nov. 3 — similar to what he did in 2016.

Detroit is Michigan's largest city in the state's largest county, a traditional Democratic stronghold that this fall will likely produce the most Democratic votes among all Michigan counties. In 2016, Detroit supplied 10% of Clinton's statewide vote total, while Wayne County provided about 23%.

Many of the 25 Republican volunteer primary poll challengers at the TCF Center said they plan to be back Nov. 3.

"The integrity of the vote is at stake in my opinion," said Frost, the 73-year-old from Warren.

Like other Republicans, Frost said he wants to see more poll challengers in Detroit — GOP and Democrats. The Democrats had two lawyers at the TCF Center for the primary, according to the Republicans.

"I’m here to watch you," Cushman said one of the Democratic lawyers told him.

Rosanne Ponkowski, 63, of West Bloomfield said she hopes more Democratic poll challengers are active in November, adding election integrity is the No. 1 priority.

"It’s in their interest to make sure the ballots are handled correctly. Period," Ponkowski said.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, May 28, 2020

Twitter Fact Check Of Trump On Absentee Ballots Is A Blatant Farce To Cover Up Gerrymandering

5-Minute Guide to the Electoral College
Guess which states had land banks?
To begin, I endearingly refer to Twitter as twat.

Twat lied in Judiciary.

Twat suppressed the U.S. House Judiciary Chairman Emeritus.

Twat participated with #perkinscoiesucks in the 2012, 2014, 2015 and 2016 elections.

Jack Dorsey took Detroit TARP with Punk Ass Pulte. 

Jack invests in tiny human lab rat research with Dan Gilbert in Ohio at the Cleveland Clinic.



The Detroit Land Bank Authority absentee ballot issue is how Trump got elected because the model was transposed to all the other fake ass land banks, which used the properties stolen by fake ass mortgage and property tax fraud schemes, in densely concentrated, targeted, geographic areas, where all "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) reside, to use the property addresses to run fake ass identities to vote out the clerks' office, where the local election commissions falsely certify, even though there are challenges to the precincts being shuttered, moved, or just unable to find, for the purposes of securing the Electoral College of those States.

Quintessentially, when you win Detroit, you win the Electoral Votes of Michigan, and the rest of the nation, because the national election is all linked to Detroit.

Just ask Fat Ass.



The rest of those highly cherished big Electoral Vote States fell, in a toggle effect, because they were busted in the fake ass absentee ballots schemes, and Trump won.

So, why did I do what I did, while continuing to do what I do?

Because the Meanies were uber mean to my Sweetie.

They were stealin' the children, land and vote, a practice known as gerrymandering.

Twat should be going into federal receivership probably under Library of Congress, making it a public forum, because twat owns all posts and communications under copyright.

It is just an issue of preserving the integrity of obviation because people lie, and so does twat.

Facebook will be next.

#maytheheavensfall 
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

SCOTUS: Stealin' The Vote - Bribery & The Electoral College - Removal From Office - Quid Pro Quo In Nullification

The question is whether an elected official can be removed from office for bribery in changing the electoral college vote in a presidential election.


Yes, there are "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) vociferously defending state elected officials in changing their votes based upon being bribed or blackmailed in the electoral college vote and whether these electors can be removed from office.

This is also called quid pro quo.

You can remove an elected official from office for bearing false witness through the vote in corrupting the public record.

You can also remove an elected official from office if they are unduly elected, with a fake ass certification of the oath of office.

It is called nullification.

I could never figure out why these lawyers use pre-Emancipation Proclamation court opinions to support post-Emancipation Proclamation arguments.

The real query should be to ask where did that bribery money come from.

I am going to say stealin' the children, land & vote.

When you take an oath of office to not breach the public trust, them, get bribed and/or blackmail, then, is this not called rule by fear, which means there is no consent?

But, in the situation of the Democratic National Committee, which is a private corporation, funded through stealin'  with foreign money which was stolen from the posterity of the state, how come we cannot just dissolve the incorporation under the laws of the States?

Wait a minute...

It seems the Michigan Democratic Party has been defrocked from its right to engage in any act of commerce, or political activities, like elections.

Image may contain: text

The purpose or purposes for which the corporation is organized are: To lawfully form a political party called the Democratic Party. To find and run people with compatible political philosophy for public office and appointments. To raise campaign funds and operating expenses as a non-profit political corporation within the laws of the state under the government and the laws of the United States of America. To make and hold all politicians accountable for any violations of our constitutions. To seek out candidates for public office that will ensure that the government of these United States and this state remain forever within the bounds of our respective constitutions. To seek the lawful means to publicly execute any public office holder for betraying their oath of office and our constitutions. To seek severe and public punishments for office holders that engage graft, greed and corruption while in office such as bribery, trading in influence, patronage, nepotism and cronyism, electoral fraud, embezzlement, kickbacks, unholy alliances, or involvement in organized crime.

Michigan LARA
ID Number: 800930810      
Summary for:  DEMOCRATIC PARTY           
The name of the DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION:   DEMOCRATIC PARTY
     
The name was changed from: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY on 09-29-2011
     
Entity type:   DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION
Identification Number: 800930810 Old ID Number: 7102U
 
Date of Incorporation in Michigan:   08/16/2011

Purpose: Stealin' the children, land & vote.

Date of Dissolved: 12/01/2015 Term: Perpetual  <=============Look!!!!
 
Most Recent Annual Report: 2012 Most Recent Annual Report with Officers & Directors:   2012
         
The name and address of the Resident Agent:
Resident Agent Name: DEAN S HAZEL
Street Address: 1028 N MONROE ST
Apt/Suite/Other:
City: MONROE State: MI Zip Code: 48162
Registered Office Mailing address:
P.O. Box or Street Address:
Apt/Suite/Other:
City: State: Zip Code:
   
Act Formed Under:   162-1982 Nonprofit Corporation Act
   
The corporation is formed on a Directorship basis.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We should definitely ask Grace Meng if she can be removed from office.

Grace Meng, ’97
New York, New York

Grace Meng headshot
Grace Meng, top honcho of the GO BLUE
Corporate Shape Shifting
Democratic National Committee &
New York Congresswoman
Is serving her second term in the U.S. House of Representatives, representing the Sixth Congressional District of New York, encompassing the borough of Queens. Ms. Meng also serves as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee and as the Vice Chair and Committee Director of the DNC, which is inactive because the parent corporation is dissolved.

Full Bio

Ms. Meng is the first Asian-American member of Congress from New York State and the only Congress member of Asian descent in the entire Northeast. She is also the first female member of Congress from Queens since former vice presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro. She also serves as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee.

Ms. Meng is a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and its Subcommittees on the Middle East and North Africa, and Asia. She also serves on the House Small Business Committee where she is the ranking member of the Agriculture, Energy and Trade Subcommittee.

Congresswoman Meng is also an assistant whip in the House and a founder and co-chair of the Kids’ Safety Caucus, the first bipartisan coalition in the House that promotes child-safety issues. She helped create and serves as co-chair of the Quiet Skies Caucus, which works to mitigate excessive aircraft noise that adversely affects communities. During her first term in the House, Ms. Meng scored several legislative victories, a significant accomplishment for a new member of Congress. In fact, she was one of just 12 Democrats – out of all 207 – who passed three or more bills, placing her in the top six percent.

Born in Elmhurst, Queens, and raised in the Bayside section of the borough, Ms. Meng attended local schools, and graduated from Stuyvesant High School, and the University of Michigan. She then earned a law degree from Yeshiva University, Benjamin Cardozo School of Law.

Prior to serving in Congress, Ms. Meng was a member of the New York State Assembly. Before entering public service, she worked as a public-interest lawyer. She resides in Queens with her husband, Wayne, and two sons, Tyler and Brandon, and her dog, Bounce.


ID Number: 800930811      
Summary for:  YET TO BE NAMED PARTY           
The name of the DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION:   YET TO BE NAMED PARTY
     
The name was changed from: REPUBLICAN PARTY on 09-26-2013
The name was changed from: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY on 09-19-2011
     
Entity type:   DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION
Identification Number: 800930811 Old ID Number: 71029T
 
Date of Incorporation in Michigan:   08/16/2011

Purpose:

Date of Dissolved: 12/01/2015 Term: Perpetual  <=============Look!!!
 
Most Recent Annual Report: 2012 Most Recent Annual Report with Officers & Directors:   2012
         
The name and address of the Resident Agent:
Resident Agent Name: DEAN S HAZEL
Street Address: 1028 N MONROE ST
Apt/Suite/Other:
City: MONROE State: MI Zip Code: 48162
Registered Office Mailing address:
P.O. Box or Street Address:
Apt/Suite/Other:
City: State: Zip Code:
 
     
Act Formed Under:   162-1982 Nonprofit Corporation Act
   
The corporation is formed on a Directorship basis.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No photo description available.
https://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/BusinessEntityDetail.do?quitButtonDestination=BusinessEntityResults&nameTyp=ENT&masterFileId=20161316586&entityId2=20161316586&fileId=20161316586&srchTyp=ENTITY
How can one swear a superseding oath of fealty to a foreign corporation, under the laws of a foreign nation when you have to swear an oath of fealty to the United States as a domestic office holder of the children's trusts?

Now, the question for SCOTUS is, "Which foreign nation?"

There is no certificate of dissolution, which means that it was placed in a legal suspended animation.

When, we have no idea but I am going with December 1, 2015.

Who did it?

I am going with Auntie, the Co-Parentor of the Children, as my final answer.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DEMOCRATIC PARTY NONPROFIT
Company Number
800930810
Previous Company Numbers
71028U
Status
Dissolved <======================= Look!!!
Incorporation Date
16 August 2011 (over 8 years ago)
Dissolution Date
1 December 2015
Company Type
DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION
Jurisdiction
Michigan (US)
Registered Address
1028 N MONROE ST MONROE MI 48162
United States
Previous Names
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Alternative Names
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE (trading name, 2012-07-26 - 2015-12-01)
DEMOCRATIC PARTY (trading name, 2011-09-09 - 2011-09-29)
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF MICHIGAN (trading name, 2011-08-22 - 2015-12-01)
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF MICHIGAN STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE (trading name, 2011-09-09 - 2015-12-01)
MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY (trading name, 2011-08-17 - 2015-12-01)
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY (trading name, 2011-09-29 - 2015-12-01)
THE MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY (trading name, 2011-08-17 - 2015-12-01)
Agent Name
DEAN S HAZEL
Inactive Directors / Officers
DEAN S HAZEL, agent
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

With this new information presented to SCOTUS, it seems the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) failed to execute a simple search on the legal standing of their respective parties they are supposedly representing, which makes everything they just entered into the formal record to be an act of bearing false witness, meaning all that work on their arguments are now moot.

Idiots.

So, for my closing arguments, I am going to say, as I always do, how is it you can prosecute a ham sandwich, or rather, how can you prosecute something which does not exist?

DUH!

Where is Mueller?

This means everyone was unduly elected, grounds for nullification.

I shall also presume all the Michigan Governor Executive Orders are unconstitutional, too!

#sealsmatter

#matheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, September 16, 2017

CONYERS: Ahead Of Constitution Day, Conyers Introduces Resolution Urging Congress And The States To Reform The Electoral College


Washington, D.C. Sunday’s  ~ Constitution Day, House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) introduced H. Con. Res. 79, a resolution expressing the sense of Congress that it and the States should consider a constitutional amendment to reform the Electoral College and to establish a process for electing the President and Vice President by a national popular vote.  The resolution also encourages the states to further their efforts to form an interstate compact to award their Electoral College votes to the national popular vote winner.  Rep. Conyers released the following statement upon the bill’s introduction: 

Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
“This Sunday, September 17, is Constitution Day, which marks the 230th anniversary of the Philadelphia Convention’s approval of the Constitution.  We should rightly celebrate the day that the Framers endorsed the basic framework of our democratic system of government enshrined in our Nation’s governing charter.  Yet, we should also use this day as an opportunity to reflect on the fact that the Constitution still retains the Electoral College, a fundamentally anti-democratic process for electing our Nation’s highest federal officeholders.

“On five occasions in our history, the Electoral College has permitted the national popular vote winner to lose the presidential election, including the most recent election, where Hillary Clinton won nearly 3 million more votes than Electoral College winner Donald Trump. This occurs because a presidential candidate needs only 270 electoral votes and 48 states award their electoral votes on a “winner-take-all” basis.  As a result, the Electoral College creates perverse incentives for candidates that further distort the presidential campaign process in undemocratic ways.

“For example, the Electoral College encourages candidates to focus their campaign efforts on only a handful of so-called swing states.  During the last presidential campaign, for example, both major party candidates largely bypassed three of the four states with the largest populations and skipped campaigning in 12 of the 13 smallest states as well.  

“Additionally, the Electoral College is an anachronistic institution intended, in part, to protect the institution of slavery. According to Yale Law School Professor Akhil Reed Amar, who participated in a forum on Electoral College reform sponsored by House Judiciary Committee Democrats last year, the Electoral College was established, in part, to preserve the political influence of slaveholding states. Although enslaved populations were not allowed to vote, slave states insisted that three-fifths of enslaved persons be counted when determining a state’s representation in the House, which in turn affected the number of Electoral College votes allotted to the state.
           
“Given its history and undemocratic nature, it is clear that the Electoral College system must be replaced with a process that determines the election of the president and vice president by a national popular vote.  As such, Congress and the States should consider a constitutional amendment to reform the Electoral College.

“And, Congress should also encourage the States to reform the Electoral College through the formation of an interstate compact. Eleven states representing 165 electoral votes have already entered into an interstate compact to cast their electoral votes for the national popular vote winner.  When enough states – representing 270 electoral votes – join the compact, the presidential election will essentially be determined by national popular vote, obviating the need for a constitutional amendment.
               
“In a democracy, no person’s vote should be worth more than any other person’s vote.  Congress should affirm its commitment to this essential principle and definitively declare that the American people, not state-based Electors, should have the power to directly select the President and Vice President of the United States.”

Original cosponsors include,  Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA), Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-IL), Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Rep. Al Green (D-TX).
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, December 19, 2016

CONYERS: Electoral College belongs in 1787

Under the right circumstances, the political will for reform can exist.

By John Conyers, Jr.

Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
With the Electoral College meeting Monday to formally elect Donald Trump as our 45th president, it is time that we reconsider whether a political compromise approved in 1787 bears any principled or practical reason for being today.

Several serious concerns were raised at a forum I organized earlier this month featuring leading experts in history, constitutional law and political science. Most obviously, we learned that the Electoral College is anti-democratic. Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has so far received over 2.8 million more votes nationwide than Trump — the largest divergence between the popular and electoral votes in history. This is the second time there has been a divergence between the popular vote and the Electoral College in the last five elections, and the fifth time that a popular-vote loser won the White House.

We also learned that the Electoral College is rooted in slavery. At our forum, Yale law professor Akhil Amar explained that slave states opposed direct elections for president because “in a direct election system, the North would outnumber the South, whose many slaves . . . could not vote. But the Electoral College . . . instead let each Southern state count its slaves, albeit with a two-fifths discount, in computing its share of the overall count.”

Our forum also made clear that many of the arguments in defense of the Electoral College are anachronistic. Electoral College defenders argue that it serves to check the passions of ordinary voters, pointing to Alexander Hamilton’s view in The Federalist Papers that the Electoral College would help ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.”

However, the Electoral College does not meet to deliberate about who should be president. The general public does not even know the electors’ identities, and the Electoral College’s choice for president has largely been reduced to mere formality. Members of the Electoral College are party loyalists who are subject to various state laws, some of which prohibit them from even exercising independent judgment. This is why over time there have been very few faithless electors, and none that have decided an election’s outcome.

Rather than protect small-population states and rural areas from domination by large-population states and urban areas, the current system encourages candidates to overlook a majority of states and focus nearly all their campaign efforts on the small number of so-called swing states. In 2016, for instance, both major party candidates largely bypassed three of the four largest states by population during the campaign. They also skipped 12 of the 13 smallest states, from “Blue” Rhode Island to “Red” Wyoming.

Finally, some Electoral College defenders argue that direct elections for president could lead to messy nationwide vote recounts. Our experience in Florida in 2000, and Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin this year, have taught us that statewide recounts under differing and confusing rules bring neither clarity nor finality to our electoral process. By contrast, a national popular vote is historically far more likely to establish a clear winner, avoiding the necessity of recounts altogether.

Many voters have told me that the political obstacles to reform are insurmountable, with a constitutional amendment requiring a two-thirds vote in the House and Senate and ratification by three-quarters of the states. Yet in 1969 I was one of 338 members of the House of Representatives who voted on a bipartisan basis to amend the Constitution to eliminate the Electoral College. As that shows, under the right circumstances the political will for reform can exist.

However, other options are available, with 11 states accounting for 165 electoral votes having already entered an interstate compact to cast their electoral votes for the national popular vote winner. Legislation to enter the compact has been recently passed by at least one legislative chamber in four more states, potentially bringing us even closer to the 270-vote threshold needed for the interstate agreement to kick in.

The Supreme Court has long held that the “conception of political equality from the Declaration of Independence, to Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, to the 15th, 17th, and 19th Amendments can only mean one thing — one person, one vote.”

It is time that the election of our nation’s president and vice president reflect those principles as well. The greatest democracy on Earth deserves no less.


2016 National Popular Vote Tracker
Compiled from official sources by: David Wasserman @Redistrict, Cook Political Report @CookPolitical
*Denotes Official/Certified Results; "Swing State" defined as state that flipped from '12 or was decided by less than 5%.
StateClinton (D)Trump (R)OthersClinton %Trump %Others %Dem '12 MarginDem '16 MarginMargin ShiftTotal '12 VotesTotal '16 VotesRaw Votes vs. '12
U.S. Total65,844,59462,979,6167,804,20348.2%46.1%5.7%3.9%2.1%-1.8%129,075,630136,628,4135.9%
13 Swing States21,433,21422,249,3422,348,06946.6%48.3%5.1%3.6%-1.8%-5.4%43,939,91846,030,6254.8%
Non-Swing States44,411,38040,730,2745,456,13449.0%45.0%6.0%4.0%4.1%0.1%85,135,71290,597,7886.4%
13 Swing States
Arizona*1,161,1671,252,401159,59745.1%48.7%6.2%-9.1%-3.5%5.5%2,299,2542,573,16511.9%
Colorado*1,338,8701,202,484238,86648.2%43.3%8.6%5.4%4.9%-0.5%2,569,5212,780,2208.2%
Florida*4,504,9754,617,886297,17847.8%49.0%3.2%0.9%-1.2%-2.1%8,474,1799,420,03911.2%
Iowa*653,669800,983111,37941.7%51.1%7.1%5.8%-9.4%-15.2%1,582,1801,566,031-1.0%
Maine*357,735335,59354,59947.8%44.9%7.3%15.3%3.0%-12.3%713,180747,9274.9%
Michigan*2,268,8392,279,543250,90247.3%47.5%5.2%9.5%-0.2%-9.7%4,730,9614,799,2841.4%
Minnesota*1,367,7161,322,951254,14646.4%44.9%8.6%7.7%1.5%-6.2%2,936,5612,944,8130.3%
Nevada*539,260512,05874,06747.9%45.5%6.6%6.7%2.4%-4.3%1,014,9181,125,38510.9%
New Hampshire*348,526345,79049,84246.8%46.5%6.7%5.6%0.4%-5.2%710,972744,1584.7%
North Carolina*2,189,3162,362,631189,61746.2%49.8%4.0%-2.0%-3.7%-1.6%4,505,3724,741,5645.2%
Ohio*2,394,1642,841,005261,31843.6%51.7%4.8%3.0%-8.1%-11.1%5,580,8405,496,487-1.5%
Pennsylvania*2,926,4412,970,733218,22847.9%48.6%3.6%5.4%-0.7%-6.1%5,753,5466,115,4026.3%
Wisconsin*1,382,5361,405,284188,33046.5%47.2%6.3%6.9%-0.8%-7.7%3,068,4342,976,150-3.0%
Non-Swing States
Alabama*729,5471,318,25575,57034.4%62.1%3.6%-22.2%-27.7%-5.5%2,074,3382,123,3722.4%
Alaska*116,454163,38738,76736.6%51.3%12.2%-14.0%-14.7%-0.7%300,495318,6086.0%
Arkansas*380,494684,87265,26933.7%60.6%5.8%-23.7%-26.9%-3.2%1,069,4681,130,6355.7%
California*8,753,7884,483,810943,99761.7%31.6%6.7%23.1%30.1%7.0%13,038,54714,181,5958.8%
Connecticut*897,572673,21574,13354.6%40.9%4.5%17.3%13.6%-3.7%1,558,1141,644,9205.6%
Delaware*235,603185,12720,86053.4%41.9%4.7%18.6%11.4%-7.2%413,890441,5906.7%
District of Columbia*282,83012,72315,71590.9%4.1%5.0%83.6%86.8%3.1%293,764311,2686.0%
Georgia*1,877,9632,089,104125,30645.9%51.0%3.1%-7.8%-5.2%2.7%3,900,0504,092,3734.9%
Hawaii*266,891128,84733,19962.2%30.0%7.7%42.7%32.2%-10.5%434,697428,937-1.3%
Idaho*189,765409,05591,43527.5%59.3%13.2%-31.9%-31.8%0.1%652,274690,2555.8%
Illinois*3,090,7292,146,015299,68055.8%38.8%5.4%16.9%17.1%0.2%5,242,0145,536,4245.6%
Indiana*1,033,1261,557,286144,54637.8%56.9%5.3%-10.2%-19.2%-9.0%2,624,5342,734,9584.2%
Kansas*427,005671,01886,37936.1%56.7%7.3%-21.7%-20.6%1.1%1,159,9711,184,4022.1%
Kentucky*628,8541,202,97192,32432.7%62.5%4.8%-22.7%-29.8%-7.1%1,797,2121,924,1497.1%
Louisiana*780,1541,178,63870,24038.4%58.1%3.5%-17.2%-19.6%-2.4%1,994,0652,029,0321.8%
Maryland*1,677,928943,169160,34960.3%33.9%5.8%26.1%26.4%0.3%2,707,3272,781,4462.7%
Massachusetts*1,995,1961,090,893238,95760.0%32.8%7.2%23.1%27.2%4.1%3,167,7673,325,0465.0%
Mississippi*485,131700,71423,51240.1%57.9%1.9%-11.5%-17.8%-6.3%1,285,5841,209,357-5.9%
Missouri*1,071,0681,594,511143,02638.1%56.8%5.1%-9.4%-18.6%-9.3%2,757,3232,808,6051.9%
Montana*177,709279,24040,19835.7%56.2%8.1%-13.7%-20.4%-6.8%484,048497,1472.7%
Nebraska*284,494495,96163,77233.7%58.7%7.6%-21.8%-25.0%-3.3%794,379844,2276.3%
New Jersey*2,148,2781,601,933123,83555.5%41.4%3.2%17.8%14.1%-3.7%3,640,2923,874,0466.4%
New Mexico*385,234319,66693,41848.3%40.0%11.7%10.1%8.2%-1.9%783,758798,3181.9%
New York*4,547,2182,814,346348,56259.0%36.5%4.5%28.2%22.5%-5.7%7,072,0837,710,1269.0%
North Dakota*93,758216,79433,80827.2%63.0%9.8%-19.6%-35.7%-16.1%322,932344,3606.6%
Oklahoma*420,375949,13683,48128.9%65.3%5.7%-33.5%-36.4%-2.8%1,334,8721,452,9928.8%
Oregon*1,002,106782,403216,82750.1%39.1%10.8%12.1%11.0%-1.1%1,789,2702,001,33611.9%
Rhode Island*252,525180,54331,07654.4%38.9%6.7%27.5%15.5%-11.9%446,049464,1444.1%
South Carolina*855,3731,155,38992,26540.7%54.9%4.4%-10.5%-14.3%-3.8%1,964,1182,103,0277.1%
South Dakota117,442227,70124,90431.7%61.5%6.7%-18.0%-29.8%-11.8%363,815370,0471.7%
Tennessee*870,6951,522,925114,40734.7%60.7%4.6%-20.4%-26.0%-5.6%2,458,5772,508,0272.0%
Texas*3,877,8684,685,047406,31143.2%52.2%4.5%-15.8%-9.0%6.8%7,993,8518,969,22612.2%
Utah*310,676515,231305,52327.5%45.5%27.0%-48.0%-18.1%30.0%1,017,4401,131,43011.2%
Vermont*178,57395,36941,12556.7%30.3%13.1%35.6%26.4%-9.2%299,290315,0675.3%
Virginia*1,981,4731,769,443231,83649.8%44.4%5.8%3.9%5.3%1.5%3,854,4893,982,7523.3%
Washington*1,742,7181,221,747401,17951.8%36.3%11.9%14.9%15.5%0.6%3,125,5163,365,6447.7%
West Virginia*188,794489,37134,88626.5%68.6%4.9%-26.8%-42.2%-15.4%670,438713,0516.4%
Wyoming*55,973174,41925,45721.9%68.2%10.0%-40.8%-46.3%-5.5%249,061255,8492.7%

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©