Biogenetic Legal Library Of Corporate Parental Rights - The Acquisition Of Asset Forfeiture Of Tiny Human Chattels - Courtesy Of The Detroit Land Bank Authority & Hillary Clinton's Campaign

The University of San Diego is back at it, but this time they are doing the library database, Predictive Modeling Crap, AI datascraping, all from your handheld device.

That is correct, Hillary Clinton is getting ready to raise campaign funds, or a legal defense, for her 2020 Presidential Campaign.

Yes, through the act of miracles by and through her "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) the reengineering of child welfare is just about ready to go full blown AI.

Yes, you can procure and purvey tiny humans right from your phone though one tap adoptions.

I can see the emerging markets in trafficking tiny humans, designer CRISPR babies, on demand organ transfers, lab rat populations, well, just about anything in the biogenetic administrative world of intellectual property.

You do not need large populations anymore for human lab rats, so why not adoption, you know, Save the Children.

What better service to market to the tiny human lab rat industries than have the go to repository for bioethics.

See, you cannot own any DNA or RNA, but you surely can own protein strands, which you can then patent and safely tuck away all those encrypted keys for those bitcoin children's trusts, who have probably yet to be created, in your super secret vaults, all for the purposes of stealin'.

Yup.

Think of all those zygotes and embryos, just abandoned in some cryogenic christian pro life lab, waiting to be adopted by some foreign corporation for perinatal and neonatal biogenetic studies.

Embryo donation is a radical mutation affecting the conception of individuals. In some cases, embryo donation may be the only solution available to remedy the problem of infertility, enabling the accomplishment of parent-born offspring without a genetic link. According to French law, the embryo is not a “simple” element of the human body, but a “potential person.”

Where does one go for legal citation of parental rights, acquisition of goods?

To your android phone, of course!

Data from Adoption - University of San Diego Libraries

But wait, it gets better!

Michigan is the first state to initiate the maximization of revenues from a fetus.

Yes, that is correct, you can file for a tax credit for the fetus, which, by the way this bill is introduced, I would most definitely say this was specifically written for corporate parents, who may just so happen to be foreign corporations.

Here is the Michigan Fetal Death Reporting Form.....for a facility, which is a commercial way of identifying the corporate parent.

As seen on the form, there is even opportunity for Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare.

A fetal death indicates that the corporate parent is "salvaging the soul" of the child, for financial leveraging purposes, only, of course, to be listed in the manifest of some UCC lien, to be pirated off to a foreign land in the children's trust of the Public Private Partnership, across the seas of maritime law, under some form of allodial title of nobility.

Good thing Hillary is building her new privatized law libraries for trafficking tiny humans because she has a campaign to run in Detroit!

SENATE BILL NO. 393

August 20, 2019, Introduced by Senator BARRETT and referred to the Committee on Finance.

A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled

"Income tax act of 1967,"

by amending section 8 (MCL 206.8), as amended by 2018 PA 38.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

Sec. 8. (1) "Department" means the revenue division of the department of treasury.

(2) "Dependent" means a dependent any of the following:

(a) A qualifying child as defined in section 152 of the internal revenue code.

(b) A qualifying relative as defined in section 152 of the internal revenue code.

(c) A fetus that has, as determined by a physician, completed at least 12 weeks of gestation as of the last day of the tax year, and that has been under the care and observation of a physician since at least 12 weeks of gestation. As used in this subdivision:

(i) "Fetus" means an individual organism of the species Homo sapiens at any time before complete delivery from a pregnant woman.

(ii) "Physician" means an individual licensed to engage in the practice of medicine or the practice of osteopathic medicine and surgery under article 15 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.16101 to 333.18838.

(3) "Employee" means an employee as defined in section 3401(c) of the internal revenue code. Any person from whom an employer is required to withhold for federal income tax purposes shall prima facie be deemed an employee.

(4) "Employer" means an employer as defined in section 3401(d) of the internal revenue code. Any person required to withhold for federal income tax purposes shall prima facie be deemed an employer.

Enacting section 1. This amendatory act is effective for tax years beginning on and after January 1, 2019.

https://www.genomenon.com/nih-grant-micropublications-genomic-interpretation/

Genomenon Wins NIH Grant to Develop Micropublications for Genomic InterpretationGrant to Automate Variant Interpretation and Create Platform for Sharing Micropublications Across the Genomics Community

Genomenon, Inc., the leading genomic search engine company, announced today that it was awarded a grant by the National Institutes of Health. The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant, awarded by the National Human Genome Research Institute*, will fund Genomenon’s further innovation in automating aspects of genomic interpretation from the research literature, and the creation of a platform for producing and sharing “micropublications” across the genomics community.

Micropublications are designed to rapidly place research findings and reviews in the public domain. Curated genomic variant interpretation can be made more efficient if findings and reviews can be rapidly published and shared across the research and clinical community. The grant funds Genomenon’s work to automatically organize the information relevant to genomic classification, along with conclusive content from scientific references, publish the findings, and share the information in a public format.

Importantly, the aim is to allow users to modify and keep up to date the micropublication as new research is published in the field so the findings are always up to date.

“This grant allows us to build on the work from our last successful NIH funding to increase the automation of variant interpretation and allow users to rapidly share their findings across the scientific community.” said Genomenon’s Co-founder and CSO, Dr. Mark Kiel. “This automated micropublication platform will help accelerate the sharing of knowledge as more and more genomic research is being published every year.

* Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R43HG010446. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

About Genomenon

Genomenon connects patient DNA with the billions of dollars spent on research to help doctors diagnose and cure cancer patients and babies with rare diseases.

Our flagship product, the Mastermind Genomic Search Engine is used by hundreds of genetic labs worldwide to accelerate diagnosis, increase diagnostic yield and assure repeatability in reporting genetic testing results.

We license our Mastermind Curated Genomic Datasets to pharmaceutical and bio-pharma companies to inform precision medicine development, deliver genomic biomarkers for clinical trial target selection, and support CDx regulatory submissions with empirical evidence.

For more information, contact us.

Genomic is in the investment portfolio of Invest Detroit, courtesy of the Detroit Land Bank Authority "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

https://web.archive.org/web/20190701232844/https://investdetroit.com/

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=duggan+infant+mortality

Modern day human trafficking is just so much fun!

Have a great day!

#perkinscoiesucks

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

OVERSIGHT: Full Committee Business Meeting: 7/25/2019 - Cybersecurity & Critical Infrastructure

Build the Wall! 

This report examines the emerging regulatory and policy landscape surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) in jurisdictions around the world and in the European Union. In addition, a survey of international organizations describes the approach that United Nations agencies and regional organizations have taken towards AI. As the regulation of AI is still in its infancy, guidelines, ethics codes, and actions by and statements from governments and their agencies on AI are also addressed. While the country surveys look at various legal issues, including data protection and privacy, transparency, human oversight, surveillance, public administration and services, autonomous vehicles, and lethal autonomous weapons systems, the most advanced regulations were found in the area of autonomous vehicles, in particular for the testing of such vehicles.

Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Selected Jurisdictions - January 2019 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

DOJ: Four Men Sentenced to Prison for Engaging in a Child Exploitation Enterprise on the Tor Network

You have networks, but you also have servers, big, encrypted servers, but I believe DOJ finally has mastered an understanding of the world of trafficking tiny humans.

The creator and lead administrator of a highly sophisticated Tor-network-based website dedicated to the sexual abuse of children was sentenced Friday, along with three others, for their roles in this global child exploitation enterprise. 

Patrick D. Falte, 29, of Franklin, Tennessee, was sentenced to 35 years in prison for engaging in a child exploitation enterprise, three counts of advertising child pornography, and three counts of distributing child pornography.  Benjamin A. Faulkner, 28, of Ontario, Canada, was sentenced to 35 years in prison; Andrew R. Leslie, 24, of Middleburg, Florida, was sentenced to 30 years in prison; and Brett A. Bedusek, 35, of Cudahy, Wisconsin, was sentenced to 20 years in prison, all for engaging in a child exploitation enterprise, by Chief U.S. District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw of the Middle District of Tennessee.  The judge also sentenced each defendant to a lifetime of supervised release.  Falte had previously pleaded guilty to the charges in June 2018, and Faulkner, Leslie and Bedusek had pleaded guilty in November 2018. 

“The Giftbox Exchange proved a haven for sophisticated predators to produce and spread deplorable depictions of child sexual abuse,” said Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.  “These sentences affirm that layers of anonymity on the dark web will not prevent the Department of Justice from identifying and holding accountable those who exploit children.”

“The sentences imposed on these despicable individuals should insure that they never have another opportunity to abuse another child,” said U.S. Attorney Don Cochran for the Middle District of Tennessee.  “With all that we have, we will continue to hunt down the evil and abominable like-minded individuals who delight in abusing children and will bring them to justice.”

In July 2015, Falte created a website called the “Giftbox Exchange” as a Tor hidden service, meaning it could only be accessed by users through the Tor anonymity network.  Falte paid for the operation of the site using the cryptocurrency Bitcoin.  He acted as the lead administrator of the site and established rules that required users to upload and share images and videos depicting pre-teen children being sexually abused before they could access the site. 

The site was organized into different forums for posting different types of child pornography, categorized by age range of the minor victims — including a sub forum for “Babies & Toddlers.”  At the time the site was shut down in November 2016, it had over 72,000 registered users and 56,000 posts.  In addition to operating the site on the Tor network—which masks the internet protocol addresses of the users — Falte and his co-conspirators used other advanced technological means to thwart law enforcement efforts, including file encryption and cryptography.

Faulkner joined the Giftbox Exchange in September 2015 and also became an administrator of the site.  In addition to his administration of Giftbox Exchange, he created and administered another Tor network-based hidden service website dedicated to child sexual exploitation, which grew to host over 200,000 users.  Faulkner also created and administered a separate Tor hidden service reserved for producers of child pornography.  Leslie, in addition to his membership on the Giftbox Exchange, himself ran yet another Tor network-based hidden service website, which explicitly allowed images and videos depicting graphic and violent sexual abuse of children.  Bedusek, who has a prior federal conviction for receipt of child pornography and engaged in activity on Giftbox Exchange while on federal supervised release for that offense, was a VIP member of Giftbox Exchange which gave him access to a special area of the site, and a moderator on one of the hidden services created by Faulkner.

In addition to running an online network dedicated to child sexual exploitation, Falte and Faulkner were sentenced in September 2017 to life imprisonment by Judge John A. Gibney, Jr., of the Eastern District of Virginia, in connection with their sexual abuse of a toddler-aged minor to whom they gained access through an individual they met through the Giftbox Exchange.  They traveled to abuse that minor on multiple occasions.  Faulkner also separately traveled to Texas and sexually abused a toddler and produced child pornography of an infant.  In March 2018, Leslie was sentenced to 60 years of imprisonment to be followed by a lifetime of supervised release by U.S. District Judge Brian J. Davis of the Middle District of Florida, in connection with his sexual abuse and production of child pornography involving multiple children, including an infant and a toddler.

The case was investigated by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations and the High Technology Investigative Unit of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS).  CEOS Trial Attorney Lauren E. Britsch and Assistant U.S. Attorneys S. Carran Daughtrey and Byron M. Jones of the Middle District of Tennessee prosecuted the case. 

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and CEOS, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims.  For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

DOJ: Attorney General Barr Speaks At Cyber Security Conference

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

DEFANGO: The Cicada 3301 Expose Long Cut

For those who are into Cicada 3301.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

DEFANGO: Hatman Malware Cyber Threat to ICS Da Vinci

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

DEFANGO: Kimdotcom announces Kimcoin Airdrop | Bitcache is Now K.im

While learning about Kimdotcom and his new adventure into the tech frontier, I want you to sit back, relax and close your eyes.

I want you to see a new Library of Congress, entangled with the U.S. Treasury as its spine, with the arms and legs of Justice, embracing the people, one at a time, in a public trust, for every person.

That public trust is encrypted, in the Lockean maternal sense, which should be the true concept of child welfare, our most precious treasures.

No more layers. No more fraudulent billing. No more money laundering. No more of the peculiar institution.

You will stop trafficking tiny humans.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

ENCRYPTION WORKING GROUP RELEASES YEAR-END REPORT

The report contains key observations and opportunities for progress

Washington, D.C. –Members of the bipartisan encryption working group – established in March 2016 by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI), and Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) – today released a year-end report laying out key observations and next steps.

For nearly a year, the Encryption Working Group has held numerous meetings with a variety of federal, state, and local government entities, former government officials, private industry and trade associations, civil society organizations, consultants and legal experts, academia, and cryptographers. These meetings have produced critical information, culminating in a year-end report that lays out four key observations and identifies several areas for future discussion next Congress.

The report concludes:

“Encryption is inexorably tied to our national interests. It is a safeguard for our personal secrets and economic prosperity. It helps to prevent crime and protect national security. The widespread use of encryption technologies also complicates the missions of the law enforcement and intelligence communities. As described in this report, those complications cannot be ignored. This is the reality of modern society. We must strive to find common ground in our collective responsibility: to prevent crime, protect national security, and provide the best possible conditions for peace and prosperity.

“That is why this can no longer be an isolated or binary debate. There is no ‘us versus them,’ or ‘pro-encryption versus law enforcement.’ This conversation implicates everyone and everything that depends on connected technologies—including our law enforcement and intelligence communities. This is a complex challenge that will take time, patience, and cooperation to resolve.  The potential consequences of inaction—or overreaction—are too important to allow historical or ideological perspectives to stand in the way of progress.”

Below are key observations of the report.

1.      Any measure that weakens encryption works against the national interest.

2.      Encryption technology is a global technology that is widely and increasingly available around the world.

3.      The variety of stakeholders, technologies, and other factors create different and divergent challenges with respect to encryption and the “going dark” phenomenon, and therefore there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the encryption challenge.

4.      Congress should foster cooperation between the law enforcement community and technology companies.

Based on these observations, the report has identified several areas for future discussion by the committees next Congress, such as exploring opportunities to help law enforcement agencies navigate the process of accessing information from private companies; examining options to improve law enforcement’s ability to leverage metadata; reviewing the circumstances, resources and legal framework necessary to help law enforcement agencies exploit existing flaws in digital products; considering the implications of alternative legal strategies such as compelling individual consumers to decrypt their devices, and the role of encryption in fostering greater data security and privacy.

The members of the working group issuing the report are House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), House Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-N.J.), and Representatives Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI), Darrell Issa (R-CA), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Suzan DelBene (D-WA), Bill Johnson (R-OH), and Yvette D. Clarke (D-NY).

House Judiciary & Energy and Commerce Committees Encryption Working Group Year-End Report December 20, 2016... by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Conyers, Goodlatte, Upton, and Pallone Announce Bipartisan Encryption Working Group

Encryption a Top Issue for House Judiciary and Energy and Commerce Committees

Dean of the U.S. House
'of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.

Washington, D.C.  – House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), Ranking Member John Conyers (D-MI), House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI), and Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) today announced the creation of an encryption working group to examine the complicated legal and policy issues surrounding encryption. The group will identify potential solutions that preserve the benefits of strong encryption – including the protection of Americans’ privacy and information security - while also ensuring law enforcement has the tools needed to keep us safe and prevent crime. The House Judiciary Committee and Energy and Commerce Committee have primary jurisdiction over encryption and the issues it presents for citizens, law enforcement, and American technology companies.

Members of the working group are:

Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI)

Darrell Issa (R-CA)

Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)

Suzan DelBene (D-WA)

Bill Johnson (R-OH)

Adam Kinzinger (R-IL)

Yvette Clarke (D-NY)

Joe Kennedy (D-MA)

Chairmen Goodlatte and Upton and Ranking Members Conyers and Pallone will serve as ex officio members of the working group and released the following joint statement:

“The widespread use of strong encryption is important to protecting Americans’ privacy.  We also recognize that challenges remain for law enforcement agencies seeking to disrupt criminals and terrorists from doing us harm. The bipartisan encryption working group will examine the issues surrounding this ongoing national debate. Members will work toward finding solutions that allow law enforcement agencies to fulfill their responsibility without harming the competitiveness of the U.S. technology sector or the privacy and security that encryption provides for U.S. citizens. We look forward to continuing our work on this important issue facing our country.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Statement of Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. Full Committee Hearing: “The Encryption Tightrope: Balancing Americans’ Security and Privacy”

Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.

“Thank you, Mr. Chairman.  I want to associate myself with your comments about our jurisdiction. 

“It is not an accident that the House Judiciary Committee is the committee of primary jurisdiction with respect to the legal architecture of government surveillance. 

“In times of heightened tension, many of our colleagues will rush to do something, anything, to get out in front of an issue.  We welcome their voices in the debate—but it is here, in this Committee room, that the House begins to make decisions about the tools and methods available to law enforcement.

“I believe that it is important to say up front, before we get into the details of the Apple case, that strong encryption keeps us safe even as it protects our privacy. 

“Former NSA Director Michael Hayden said last week that ‘America is more secure . . . with unbreakable end-to-end encryption.’

“In this room, just last Thursday, former Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff testified that, in his experience, strong encryption helps law enforcement more than it hinders any agency in any given case.

“The National Security Council has concluded that ‘the benefits to privacy, civil liberties, and cybersecurity gained from encryption outweigh the broader risks . . . created by weakening encryption.’

           

            “And Director Comey has put it very plainly:

‘Universal strong encryption will protect all of us—our innovation, our private thoughts, and so many other things of value—from thieves of all kinds.  We will all have lock-boxes in our lives that only we can open and in which we can store all that is valuable to us.  There are lots of good things about this.’

“Now, for years, despite what we know about the benefits of encryption, the Department of Justice and the FBI have urged this Committee to give them the authority to mandate that companies create back doors into their secure products. 

“I have been reluctant to support this idea for a number of reasons.  The technical experts have warned us that it is impossible to intentionally introduce flaws into secure products—often called ‘back doors’—that only law enforcement can exploit, to the exclusion of terrorists and cyber criminals. 

“The tech companies have warned us that it would cost millions of dollars to implement and would place them at a competitive disadvantage around the world. 

“The national security experts have warned us that terrorists and other criminals will simply resort to other tools, entirely outside the reach of our law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

“And I accept that reasonable people can disagree with me on each of these points.

“What concerns me, Mr. Chairman, is that in the middle of an ongoing congressional debate on this subject, the FBI would ask a federal magistrate to give them the special access to secure products that this Committee, this Congress, and the Administration have so far refused to provide.

“Why has the government taken this step and forced this issue?  I suspect that part of the answer lies in an email obtained by the Washington Post and reported to the public last September. 

“In it, a senior lawyer in the intelligence community writes that although ‘the legislative environment towards encryption is very hostile today . . . it could turn in the event of a terrorist attack or criminal event where strong encryption can be shown to have hindered law enforcement.’

“He concluded that there is value in ‘keeping our options open for such a situation.’

“I am deeply concerned by this cynical mindset.  And I would be deeply disappointed if it turns out that the government is found to be exploiting a national tragedy to pursue a change in the law.

“I also have doubts about the wisdom of applying the All Writs Act—which was enacted in 1789, codified in 1911, and last applied to a communications provider by the Supreme Court in 1977—to a profound question about privacy and modern computing in 2016.

“I fear that pursuing this serious and complex issue through the awkward use of an inapt statute was not, and is not, the best course of action.

“I am not alone in this view.  Yesterday, in the Eastern District of New York, a federal judge denied a motion to order Apple to unlock an iPhone under circumstances similar to those in San Bernardino.

“The court found that the All Writs Act, as construed by the government, would confer on the courts an ‘overbroad authority to override individual autonomy.’

“Moreover, ‘nothing in the government’s argument suggests any principled limit on how far a court may go in requiring a person or company to violate the most deeply-rooted values.’

“We could say the same about the FBI’s request in California.  The government’s assertion of power is without limiting principle and likely to have sweeping consequences—whether or not we pretend that the request is limited to just this device, or just this one case.

“This Committee, and not the courts, is the appropriate place to consider those consequences—even if the dialogue does not yield the result desired by some in the law enforcement community.

“I am grateful that we are having this conversation today, back in the forum in which it belongs: the House Judiciary Committee.  I thank the Chairman, and I yield back.”

Testimony of Bruce Sewell Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Apple on iPhone Encryption March 1,...

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©