Showing posts with label TARP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TARP. Show all posts

Saturday, June 20, 2020

DOJ: Solicitor General Noel Francisco Announces Departure from Department of Justice

Either Noel Fransico is going to stand up and bear witness to the war crimes of gerrymandering, or rather stealin' the children, land & vote in his JonesDay stint with Kevyn Orr, as the first Emergency Manager transposable model for the Privateers to invade and conquer the United States, or he shall take his role as a co-conspiritor in the planned and coordinated attack on Michigan Government, by advocating for that fake ass Detroit Bankruptcy, where everyone who was swagging a cross around their necks got settlement for some fake ass debt against the City of Detroit by getting settlement in quiet title properties, stolen, through fake ass Rock Financial, et al, Corporate Shape Shifters through the Perkins Coie Sucks Detroit Land Bank Authority, which is was the *russian/israeli/ukrainian* election interference because they money launder through child welfare organizations to fund political campaigns.

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=noel+fransico

Boo Boo Barr still does not get the fact that you cannot promulgate, on behalf of foreign operatives who wish to overthrow the United States, the privatization of our children, land and vote with the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, under the guise of what these "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) are cloaking as Corporate Parental Rights, or rather the residuals of the peculiar institutions, because institutions are corporations, where, corporations are people, and, as such, demand parental rights, under another one of their fake ass laws they want to lube up with prolifer propaganda, slither into existence, for the purposes of fraudulently billing Medicaid, in furtherance of the best interests of the child, because children are chattel, legally acquired through default asset forfeiture laws for hailing from the population of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) when it comes to maximizing profits through trafficking tiny humans, and their souls, through the children's trusts.

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=bill+barr+RFRA

Praise the lord.

Bad Boo Boo!

#maytheheavensfall


Solicitor General of the United States Noel Francisco announces his departure from the Department of Justice, effective as of July 3, 2020.
“Solicitor General Noel Francisco has represented the United States superbly before the Supreme Court for the past three Terms,” said Attorney General William P. Barr.  Boo Boo Barr lies because Noel was mean to my Sweetie. “Arguing before the Court 17 times on behalf of the federal government, he has been a principled and persuasive advocate on issues ranging from the separation of powers to religious liberty to vigorous enforcement of federal immigration law.  His skilled advocacy has been instrumental to historic victories on behalf of the President’s national security authority, the free speech rights of public employees, and property owners’ access to federal courts, among many other significant accomplishments.  Away from the courtroom, he has been a steady and respected leader for the Office of the Solicitor General, a wise counselor to me and others in the Executive Branch, and a good friend.  I am grateful for his tireless service to his country and the Department of Justice, and I wish him well in his future endeavors.”
“It has been the honor of my professional career to serve as the Solicitor General of the United States,” said Solicitor General Noel Francisco.  “Representing the United States before the Supreme Court is one of the greatest jobs in the law and an opportunity for which I am deeply grateful.  I am proud of the significant success the Office of Solicitor General has had in advancing the rule of law of in our great nation alongside the dedicated men and women at the Department of Justice — some of the finest lawyers I have known.”
Since his appointment in 2017, Noel Francisco has served over three Supreme Court Terms as Solicitor General and has represented the United States before the nation’s highest court in more than 150 merit cases.
Under Solicitor General Francisco’s leadership, the United States consistently and successfully advocated in support of our nation’s core Constitutional principles including religious liberty, separation of powers, first amendment freedoms and enforcement of immigration laws.  Over the course of his impressive tenure as Solicitor General, Francisco argued before the Supreme Court 17 times.  Significant victories include:
  • Trump v. Hawaii: upholding the President’s restrictions on travel from countries that present national-security risks.
  • Janus v. AFSCME: holding that the First Amendment prohibits requiring public employees who decline to join a union to pay union dues (overruling a 1977 decision, Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Education).
  • Kisor v. Wilkie: significantly limiting judicial deference to agency interpretations of their own regulations while retaining such deference in core applications.
  • Knick v. Township of Scott:  allowing property owners to bring claims for government takings in federal court without first suing in state court (overruling a 1985 decision, Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank). Gerrymandering
  • Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm’n: concluding that Colorado violated the Free Exercise Clause in enforcing its antidiscrimination law against a baker who declined on religious grounds to create a custom cake for a same-sex wedding.  Corporate Parental Rights
In overseeing federal litigation, Solicitor General Francisco made strategic use of emergency motions to defend important federal programs against improper nationwide injunctions.  To that end, the government obtained relief from the Supreme Court on major immigration initiatives, including the travel proclamation, restrictions on asylum abuses, allocation of funds to build a border wall, and revisions to the definition of a public charge.  As a result of these successes, some lower courts have begun to curb the erroneous use of nationwide injunctions.
The Office of the Solicitor General and entire Department of Justice thank Solicitor General Francisco’s service and leadership.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, April 18, 2020

Paul O'Neill, Progenitor Of TARP Is Extracted From Humanity

Paul O'Neill
Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, progenitor of TARP and the Detroit Land Bank Authority, is extracted from humanity.

Gerrymandering was a strong area of his expertise.

I wonder how Steve Mnuchin is doing, right about now?

According to Wikipedia:

In 1989, he was approached by President George H. W. Bush to be Secretary of Defense. O'Neill declined, but recommended Dick Cheney for the position. Bush then pursued O'Neill to chair an advisory group on education that included Lamar Alexander, Bill Brock, and Richard Riley.

#maytheheavensfall

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill dies at age 84

U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill holds a news conference at the U.N. Conference for Financing of Development in Monterrey, Mexico on March 20, 2002. O'Neill died Saturday, April 18, 2020. He was 84.

Paul O'Neill, a former Treasury secretary who broke with George W. Bush over tax policy and then produced a book critical of the administration, died Saturday. He was 84.

O'Neill's son, Paul O'Neill Jr. confirmed that his father died at his home in Pittsburgh after battling lung cancer for the last couple of years. After a few surgeries and chemotherapy, he decided against any further intervention four or five months ago, he said.

"There was some family here and he died peacefully," the son said. "Based on his situation, it was a good exit."

A former head of aluminum giant Alcoa, O'Neill served as Treasury secretary from 2001 to late 2002. He was forced to resign after he objected to a second round of tax cuts because of their impact on deficits.

O'Neill's blunt speaking style more than once got him in trouble as Treasury secretary. He sent the dollar into a tailspin briefly in his early days at Treasury when his comments about foreign exchange rates surprised markets. In the spring of 2001, O'Neill jolted markets again when during Wall Street's worst week in 11 years, he blandly declared "markets go up and markets go down."

He was more focused on the traditional Treasury secretary's job of instilling confidence during times of turbulence later that year when he helped get Wall Street re-opened after the Sept. 11 terror attacks. O'Neill was also instrumental following the attacks in beefing up the government's programs to disrupt financing to terrorist groups.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Saturday on Twitter, "Saddened to hear of the passing of the former 72nd Treasury Secretary, Paul O'Neill. He served @USTreasury and America with distinction during challenging times. My condolences to his family."

Tony Fratto, who served as O'Neill's Treasury spokesman, described O'Neill as a "working class guy" who "cared about how things impacted real people."

Fratto, currently a partner with Hamilton Place Strategies in Washington, said that one of O'Neill's passions was workplace safety, and that he would tour the Treasury building looking for safety issues that needed to be fixed.

After leaving the administration, O'Neill worked with author Ron Suskind on an explosive book covering his two years in the administration. O'Neill contended that the administration began planning the overthrow of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein right after Bush took office, eight months before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

O'Neill depicted Bush as a disengaged president who didn't encourage debate either at Cabinet meetings or in one-on-one discussions with Cabinet members. He said the lack of discussion in Cabinet meetings gave him the feeling that Bush "was like a blind man in a roomful of deaf people."

He said major decisions were often made by Bush's political team and Vice President Dick Cheney. O'Neill had been recruited to join the Cabinet by Cheney, his old friend from the Gerald Ford administration. But it was Cheney who told O'Neill that the president wanted his resignation. It was part of a move by Bush to shake up his economic team and find a better salesman for a new round of tax cuts the president hoped would stimulate a sluggish economy.

When the book, "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House and the Education of Paul O'Neill" came out in early 2004, Bush spokesman Scott McClellan discounted O'Neill's descriptions of White House decision-making and said the president was "someone that leads and acts decisively on our biggest priorities."

After leaving the Cabinet, O'Neill returned to Pittsburgh, where he had headed Alcoa from 1987 to 1999. He resumed working with the Pittsburgh Regional Health Care Initiative, a consortium of hospitals, medical societies and businesses studying ways to improve health care delivery in Western Pennsylvania. The subject had interested him since his days as a budget analyst in Washington with the Office of Management and Budget.

He also devoted time in retirement to projects that would deliver clean drinking water to Africa. As Treasury secretary, O'Neill had focused attention on poverty and combating diseases such as AIDS in Africa, touring the continent with Irish rock star Bono.

While at Alcoa, O'Neill lifted the company out of the doldrums during his 12-year stint as the Pittsburgh company's CEO. Shortly after he took the job in April 1987, he began emphasizing factory safety and employee dignity as a top priority.

His ideas weren't initially well received by profit-driven investors, who cared more about Alcoa's financial performance. After hearing one of O'Neill's first presentations as Alcoa's CEO, one money manager decided the company had put a "crazy hippie in charge" and advised his 20 largest clients to sell its stock, according to the book, "The Power of Habit" by Charles Duhigg.

That investor later called it one of his worst decisions. By the time, O'Neill stepped down as CEO in 1999, Alcoa's accident rate had plunged and its stock had soared more than seven-fold at a time it was part of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Before joining Alcoa, O'Neill had been president from 1985 to 1987 of International Paper Co., a firm he had joined in 1977 after leaving OMB.

After graduating with an economics degree from California State University in Fresno in 1961, O'Neill joined the Veterans Administration in Washington, working as a computer systems analyst. He later moved to OMB and rose to become deputy director of the budget agency from 1974 to 1977, providing budget guidance to then-President Gerald Ford.

In June 2019, O'Neill received the Gerald R. Ford Medal for Distinguished Public Service, according to a piece in his hometown paper, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Cheney and Alan Greenspan, who headed the Federal Reserve when O'Neill was Treasury secretary, are among the past recipients of the award.

O'Neill is survived by his wife, four children, 12 grandchildren and 15 great grandchildren.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

New TARP Rules: Curb Executive Pay, Bonuses, Parachutes

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill calls pay limits "a large mistake."

Feb. 4, 2009 — -- Wall Street was bearish today over President Obama's new $500,000 pay limit for executives of financial institutions who he said have come "hat in hand" asking for taxpayers' help.

The new limits, which would affect banks that accept "exceptional assistance" from the public treasury, would also impose stricter rules on golden parachutes, entertainment, holiday parties, conferences and the use of corporate jets.

Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs at the Financial Services Roundtable, expressed concerns about the new executive compensation restrictions.

"The pay scale for Wall Street is different for the pay scale for America," Talbott told ABC News. "So these numbers look large, but the market value for these executives - there's a very small talent pool of individuals that have the education, experience and knowledge to operate a global, international services firm in this day and age."

Executives may quit banks that fall under the new $500,000 pay limits, he warned.

"I don't think the issue is a dollar amount. It's being paid what you're worth… Would you be willing to work for less than what you think you're worth?" Talbott asked.

The compensation limits might also make banks hesitant to ask the federal government for help.

"Companies will have to reevaluate whether the benefits are still worth it under the new rules," he said.

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill said Obama's move "is going to be a very popular populist move.... even though I think it is a large mistake."

O'Neill, who served under President George W. Bush, told ABC News that the banks would have complied if Obama had asked them to voluntarily follow the new limits. He also pointed out that many of the banks' employees get annual bonuses, not just the top executives. Should the limits apply to them, too, O'Neill asked.

He also said the pay limits could hurt the banks' ability to compete. "To the degree there are competing institutions out there not affected by the new edict, does this give those institutions a significant competitive advantage in attracting talent?"

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs dismissed suggestions that the pay caps could hurt the already ailing banks.

"I think we've struck the right balance," Gibbs said.

Obama's pay limits were endorsed by House Minority Leader John Boehner, a Republican from Ohio.

"I think if anybody is looking to the taxpayer to help bail their company out, these kinds of executive compensation limits are appropriate," he said.

On the $500,000 pay limit, Boehner said, "I think somebody's got to pick a number. The president has picked one. I applaud him for doing it."

ABC News contacted all 30 institutions that received $1 billion or more in bailout money, and most of them ignored the calls or declined to comment.

GMAC, which got $5 billion, said it is already subject to compensation limits imposed by the Bush administration. "We intend to comply with those requirements. We have no further comment," GMAC said.

In scolding language, the president said that the changes are necessary to help stabilize the economy.

"We've got to restore trust," Obama said. "And in order to restore trust, we've got to make certain that taxpayer funds are not subsidizing excessive compensation packages on Wall Street."

The president echoed his inauguration address when he said there would be a "new era of responsibility."

"We all need to take responsibility," he said while announcing the new compensation rules with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. "And this includes executives at major financial firms who turned to the American people, hat in hand, when they were in trouble, even as they paid themselves their customary lavish bonuses."

"What gets people upset – and rightfully so – are executives being rewarded for failure. Especially when those rewards are subsidized by U.S. taxpayers," Obama said.

The $500,000 salary limit is still more than Obama makes -- $400,000 -- but is a pittance compared to the $20 million that Kenneth Lewis took home in 2007 as head of Bank of America, a corporation that needed $45 billion of public money to save it from its mountain of bad loans.

The president said the new rules announced today would be accompanied by an effort to determine "how corporate governance and compensation rules can be reformed."

Exceptions to the New Rules
There are exceptions to the new executive pay rules, however.

Banking executives can get extra compensation in restricted stock, but only stock that will not vest until taxpayers are repaid the loans, plus interest.

Companies bailed out by Uncle Sam are permitted to waive the $500,000 rule if they disclose executive compensation and allow investors a nonbinding vote on executive pay.

Banks that have already received several hundred billion dollars from the Troubled Asset Relief Program under the Bush administration won't be subject to the new rules. But several of those banks are expected to come back to the federal till for additional relief.

The new Obama TARP rules will require those companies to demonstrate they have complied with the previously issued restrictions on executive pay and lending requirements, and agree to strict monitoring and oversight going forward.

The new rules also make it harder for corporate titans to live the high life on the public dollar. They include restrictions on how the money can be spent, with a bull's-eye on such items as aviation expenses, office renovations, entertainment and corporate parties.

The new Treasury provisions expand rules established under the Bush administration. Restrictions on golden parachutes originally applied to only the top five executives of an affected bank. That will now be extended to the top 10 officials, and golden parachutes for the next 25 top officials will be limited to one year's pay.

Clawback rules that would require banking officials would have to return bonuses if found to have falsified reports. Those rules originally applied to a bank's top five executives, but under the rules detailed today that would be extended to the top 25 bank officials.

The public has been repeatedly infuriated by examples of federally subsidized bankers still spending lavishly on themselves while laying off tens of thousands of employees and of retirement nest eggs vaporized.

Obama called it "shameful" last week when it was reported that bankers had handed out $18.5 billion in bonuses at the end of 2008, despite the dreadful year of financial losses. The White House had to intervene to persuade Citigroup to abandon plans to buy a $50 million executive jet after getting its $45 billion boost. Merrill Lynch's former CEO John Thain had to be shamed into personally repaying the $1 million he spent on renovating his office while surviving on an additional $45 billion public loan. Bank of America partied hardy at the Super Bowl last weekend. And this week, Wells Fargo reluctantly canceled a corporate outing to Las Vegas.

GOP Emboldened By Obama Stumbles
The new rules should bring a cheer from a frustrated public, a sound that the Obama White House hasn't heard in a while. The withdrawal of two top appointees this week because they hadn't paid all their taxes even prompted the president to repeatedly apologize Tuesday for not adhering to the ethical standard he had publicly set for his administration.

"This was running the possibility of really hurting his reformist image," George Stephanopoulos, ABC News' chief Washington correspondent, told "Good Morning America" today.

The withdrawal of former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle was particularly damaging because Daschle was going to be the health and human services secretary and the point man on Obama's efforts to reshape the country's health-care system.

The stumbles could also embolden Republicans who are opposing large parts of the president's economic stimulus package.

"The president's going to have to agree to some changes right now," Stephanopoulos told "GMA."

Obama will meet today with Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Neb., and Maine's two Republican senators, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. The trio are spearheading a centrist group of Democrats and Republicans working to reshape the stimulus bill.

"There will still be differences with this group," Stephanopoulos said. "The president doesn't want to bring the package down as far as some of these senators want to go. But they're going to be working intensively on a compromise today."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, April 2, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown: Emergency Manager Emperor Pence & His Procurement Consortia Task Force Stocks The Shelves For Universal Heath Care

Ssssshhhhh......

Whatever you do, do not let them know they are stocking the shelves for universal health care, which is national security.

It seems there is an issue of fraud in the procurement supply chain.

Oh my!

Raytheon came to the rescue for NYPD.

Hope nothing is contaminated.

Predictive Modeling Crapper Brix addresses why poor hospitals have not supplies.

This is fun.

She did not once talk about Medicaid fraud, or the fact that not everyone can get Mediciad and drain a community hospital, or the fact that there was so much stealin' with the layers and layers of administrative contracts, not even mentioning the legal departments.

When you are hail from "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth), it is quite difficult to apply stochastic analyses when addressing shortages in a supply chain, when you have no money to procure supplies.

Ahhhh......logic.

#maytheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, March 29, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown: What The New York Kennedy Center Of Performing Arts Did With Its TARP 2.0 Bailout

First, this happened....

Trump appoints Jon Voight, Mike Huckabee to Kennedy Center board

Then, this happened....

Will the opera help combat coronavirus?

Then, this happened...

Trump defends $25 million in Kennedy Center funding in coronavirus stimulus

Then, this happened...

Kennedy Center abruptly lays off entire orchestra hours after receiving $25 million taxpayer bailout

Then, this happened...

A Message from the Kennedy Center Regarding the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act

Like other cultural organizations and performing arts centers around the country, the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts has been negatively impacted by the current coronavirus pandemic. Because the Center was created by an Act of Congress and we exist as a living presidential memorial, the Center’s economic model is different than most arts organizations. As we fulfill our congressional mandate, we rely on ticket revenues and contributions to offset nearly every aspect of our business, including presenting live (often free) performances and offering education programs for millions across the country. Additionally, the Center is a job creator, providing employment for nearly 3,000 people and compensation for more than 1,000 guest artists. Our workforce includes artists, programmers, administrative and production staff, ushers, bartenders, food service employees, parking attendants, and many more, all of whom have been impacted or will soon be impacted by the closure of the Kennedy Center. The ability to deliver on our mandated mission is at risk. As a result, federal relief funding is the only way we will be in a position to reopen the nation’s cultural center when our government officials tell us it is safe to do so.

The Kennedy Center is extraordinarily grateful that Congress has recognized our institution’s unique status and has included funding in its economic stimulus legislation to ensure that we can reopen our doors and stages as soon as we are able. We will continue to work for and seek the support of our patrons to ensure the programming continues.

In the meantime, as our concert halls and arts venues are closed across the country, the Kennedy Center’s programmers and its family of artists have come together to produce and offer free “at-home programming” at https://www.kennedy-center.org/at-home/.



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, March 27, 2020

Monday, March 23, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown Senate Debates Its Fears In The Transposable Model TARP 2.0 Because They Stole All The TARP

These people know this is TARP 2.0 because they stole all the TARP and need more money to bail themselves out, again.

For everything you want to know about TARP because it all started in Detroit.





From what I observe, there are serious departures from the rulemaking process, leaving open legally challenges to the passage of the bill, itself.

Not on mention of fraud in the health care and insurance industry because they are pushing for a silent expansion of Child Protective Services.

The self-employed, caregivers, elderly and disabled are part of the stimulus discussions.

Every last one of these Senators financially benefited from TARP because it was, and still is, about gerrymandering, or rather, stealin' the children, land & vote.

#maytheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, March 13, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown: Emergency Manager Emperor Pence & His Procurement Consortia Task Force Advise Trump To Declare National Emergency

The Sordid Tale Of Michigan Privatization: From Emergency Manager To Russia

Emergency Manager Emperor Pence and his crackerjack Procurement Consortia Task Force came out like they are about to pull the ole "Et tu, Brutus" move on Trump.

One reason why we are witnessing complete and utter chaos is because the Procurement Consortia Task Force had to book facilities, caterers, hotels, entertainment, you know, the things the private, foreign, corporate partners in commerce do when managing the humans of the United States do.

RDC - Smart Screening
https://rdc.com/
Trump is correct in calling Emergency Manager Emperor Pence  & his band of merry corporate marauders, 'Geniuses', because we are dealing with the work of "Legal Geniuses", (trademark pending).



CMS is issuing blanket waivers on nursing homes regulation.

That sounds like human asset management for the civil debt of health care.

Ontario and Michigan have indicated that they have child welfare operations to protect the children, you know, like Child Protective Services does because they need the contracts.

It seems their trafficking tiny humans financial networks are having a bit of challenges in maintaining their assets, being seized, and all, but hey, what do I know?

I know this is nothing but the transposable model of the Michigan Emergency Manager, which is how I know what they are doing, because it is all the same people, and they were running the first Procurement Consortia Task Force with the Detroit Economic Club, birthed out the Detroit Bankruptcy.

Yami-Gucci, the Haitian Hood Rat got called out, hard, I must say with a distinct pleasure!

Now, comes the stimulus so when the health care bailout comes, no one will challenge it, because everyone was so happy with the stimulus, just like they did with TARP - keep them dumb, fat & happy.

Remember, April is Child Abuse Propaganda Month and the U.S Census is afoot...or was, I have no idea when the census will be put on hiatus but testing kits are great vehicles when building a privatized genetic database.

Trump is under false advisement to stop the heavens from falling, but it is too late.

#maytheheavensfall

Stafford Act by lisacot on Scribd
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, January 4, 2020

Paul Volcker Dies - Hank Paulson Tells Of His Role In TARP & Gerrymandering

We must definitely ask Hank to come to the trial in Detroit.



Paul Volcker dies at 92

Paul Volcker dies at 92
Paul Volcker
Paul Volcker, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve under Presidents Carter and Reagan who later played a role in the Obama administration's response to the financial crisis of 2009, has died at the age of 92.

Multiple media outlets reported Monday that Volcker, who served as Fed chairman from 1979 to 1987, had died. The Volcker Alliance, the former chairman's non-profit group, announced that he died Sunday.

Volcker is known best for using high interest rates to reverse decades of runaway inflation at the cost of a grueling recession. While Volcker was vilified by lawmakers in both parties, as well as farmers, homebuilders and manufacturers hit hardest by higher borrowing costs, he has been credited since for stabilizing the economy after years of rampant price increases.

"His life exemplified the highest ideals–integrity, courage, and a commitment to do what was best for all Americans," Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said in a Monday statement. "His contributions to the nation left a lasting legacy."

Two decades after Volcker left the Fed, he joined the Obama administration to help shape its response to the 2007-8 financial crisis and recession. That response led to the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law.

Volcker chaired former President Obama's economic recovery advisory board and advocated for stricter limits on risky investment practices that led to the 2007 panic.

Volcker advocated for a provision of Dodd-Frank that banned banks from using their own capital to make high-risk bets. That rule, known as the "Volcker Rule," was among the financial industry's chief concerns with Dodd-Frank and was formally loosened earlier this year by Trump-appointed regulators.

Volcker, a Democrat, played crucial roles in economic policy for several presidents in both parties, defining administrations and the trajectory of the U.S. economy for decades to come. He served in the Treasury Department during the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon administrations, shaping the U.S.'s response to a deteriorating global financial order.

As Treasury undersecretary for international affairs, Volcker was a driving force behind Nixon's decision to abandon the gold standard, which tied the U.S. dollar to a fixed amount of gold. Carter's appointment of Volcker to the Fed and the economic crunch to follow likely played a role in his defeat to Reagan, who nonetheless renominated Volcker in 1983.


Volcker's public standing gradually improved along with the economy, and his Fed tenure led to an era of largely stable growth with mild recessions until the 2007 financial crisis. He faced perhaps more political scrutiny than any other Fed chief until current chairman, Powell, invoked Trump's wrath soon after taking office in 2018.

After leaving the Obama administration, Volcker focused his work on bolster the effectiveness and standing of policymakers and government officials. He founded in 2013 the Volcker Alliance, a non-profit group advocating for non-partisan efforts to improve governance, and released a memoir this year entitled "Keeping At It: The Quest for Sound Money and Good Government."

Volcker warned in August that the U.S. is "developing into a plutocracy," asserting that the country was “in a hell of a mess in every direction.”

"Distrust and ill-will permeate attitudes toward government," Volcker wrote in his memoir.

"Too many of the best in the assailed bureaucracy, both in Congress and in key administrative posts, have left too soon, doubting that their voices could be heard or that their goals could be achieved. That needs to change. And it won’t be easy."


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, August 31, 2019

What Do The Members Of The Michigan Payroll Fraud Unit Have In Common?

Stop Payroll Fraud Theft final logo
Report Michigan Payroll Fraud
Q: What do the members of the Michigan Payroll Fraud Unit have in common?

A: Child Welfare Fraud in School, of course.

Michigan business engage in so much payroll fraud the Attorney General had to create the Michigan Payroll Fraud Enforcement Unit?

What I found to be of interest were the members of the Unit.

You have Detroit's own, fashion show selfie queen, Sherry Gay Dagnogo, who will do anything for a photo op while covert ops are run right in her face.

You have Jim Ananich, who succeeded John Gleason, who has a fund for organs and kids which is not registered anywhere, and just so happened to work for Dan Kildee, the spokestoken for the original concept of the Genessee Land Bank Authority for the State of Michigan under the Emergency Manager Law, where he has lots of experience.

Then you have Christine Greig who seems to know about St. Vincent Sarah Fisher and its "educational" issues through her foundation.

I believe the convening of this board is more than just to stop payroll fraud, which is actually a scourge upon Michigan and across the country, as seen in the Congressional Credit Union, the Office of Personal Management and income tax fraud, because each member has a unique background in the Michigan history of stealin' the children, the land and the votes through privatization.

They all are attached to foreign foundations.

This looks like a Mueller production, but, hey, what do I know?

I know Dana looks like a whistleblower.

I bet this unit was inspired by Bert Johnson.
Payroll Fraud

Owner of small Lansing business says payroll fraud charges stem from accounting error 


LANSING - The owner of a Lansing business faces a bevy of criminal charges over what the state calls payroll fraud but what he described as a payroll and accounting mistake.

The charges against Camron Gnass, founder of Traction Partners, a small branding and design studio, are the first to be brought by Attorney General Dana Nessel's Payroll Fraud Enforcement Unit, her office said in a news release.
Senator Jim Ananich

Senate Democratic Leader
Jim Ananich

Gnass faces 13 felony counts, including one count of racketeering and four counts of larceny by conversion, court records show. The racketeering charge is punishable by a maximum 20 years in prison upon conviction.

An investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor showed that between 2008 and 2017, Gnass failed to put money into the retirement accounts of at least two employees, even though money was deducted from their paychecks for that purpose, officials said.

The AG's office said the withheld funds went into the business' account and were used by Gnass "for his own personal gain."
Christine Greig

House Democratic Leader
Christine Greig

In a statement emailed to the State Journal, Gnass said the charges resulted from an error in the company's payroll and accounting systems. No one noticed the problem until it was brought to his attention by a former employee, he said.

"I have been working diligently to repay this debt ever since that time," he said. "The former employees have been a part of the reconciliation, and we've worked within the guidelines of the volunteer correction program with the IRS to rectify. I value each one of my employees and the work they do for our clients and our community."

Sherry Gay-Dagnogo circle

Detroit Caucus Chair
Sherry Gay-Dagnogo
A total of about $37,000 was withheld from those employees, and the money went into a business account and was never used for personal expenses, he added.

Those funds were "fully repaid" in April, along with the company's matching portions totaling about $19,000, according to Gnass' statement.

"At no point" did anyone in Nessel's office contact him or anyone else at the company about the investigation, he said.

The charges against Gnass were filed Wednesday in 54A District Court. He had not been arraigned as of early Thursday afternoon.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, August 15, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: Fat, Dumb & Happy - The Next Phase Of The UAW Corruption Climbs Up Another Rung On The TARP Ladder Of Stealin'

in Detroit
On this exciting episode of Cocktails & Popcorn, we have ascended another rung on the ladder of stealin' by exposing another layer of what it is like to be "Fat, Dumb & Happy" in Detroit.

I would be honored to meet the USAA who coined this profound phrase.

Feds charge ex-UAW leader in growing corruption scandal

Detroit — A former senior United Auto Workers official has been charged with wire fraud conspiracy and money laundering, marking an expansion of a federal corruption investigation that has spread beyond Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV.

Michael Grimes — who until last year served as administrative assistant to UAW Vice President Cindy Estrada — received $1.99 million in kickbacks from union vendors, according to the government.

Mike Grimes, left, and UAW Vice President Cindy Estrada.
Mike Grimes & Cindy Estrada
He and other unnamed union officials assigned to General Motors Co. were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes and kickbacks from vendors who received contracts to produce promotional merchandise for the UAW, according to a criminal case unsealed Wednesday.

The criminal charges, which could send Grimes to federal prison for up to 20 years, help federal investigators pierce the inner circle of Estrada, a sitting UAW vice president and head of the union's FCA department who has been under scrutiny for almost two years. The case also expands the scope of a criminal investigation that, until now, focused on Fiat Chrysler executives trying to influence contract negotiations by giving UAW officials money, lavish trips and more.

The criminal filing Wednesday described old-school corruption and greed that deprived UAW members of honest leadership and involved officials in charge of the UAW-GM Center for Human Resources, a training center for blue-collar workers. The alleged scheme also defrauded the training center, prosecutors said.

“This is the first shoe to drop involving General Motors and the UAW,” said Peter Henning, a Wayne State University law professor and former federal prosecutor. "It raises the question of what kind of monitoring the UAW was doing, or was there any?"

The criminal case was filed four months after The Detroit News exclusively reported that federal investigators were reviewing whether UAW leaders received kickbacks after giving business executives contracts to produce union-branded clothes and trinkets.

Grimes is the ninth person charged in an ongoing investigation, and the criminal case embroils a training center for blue-collar workers jointly operated by the UAW and GM.

“Mike Grimes benefited only himself, not the UAW membership, and should be fully prosecuted to the extent of the law," union spokesman Brian Rothenberg wrote in an email to The News.

Joe Ashton, left, and Cindy Estrada
Joe Ashton & Cindy Estrada
The allegations involve a key UAW official who served alongside Estrada, who was assigned to the union's GM department until last year, when she was transferred to head the scandal-plagued Fiat Chrysler department. The News reported in November 2017 that federal investigators were interested in Joe Ashton, a retired UAW vice president appointed to GM’s board in 2014, and Estrada, his successor.

Ashton resigned from GM's board one month after The News report.

"GM has been fully cooperating with the government on its investigation of the UAW Center for Human Resources, and will continue to do so," a GM spokesman said Wednesday. "As a matter of practice, we do not comment on the specifics of an ongoing investigation."

Investigators have expanded the inquiry to all three Detroit automakers and also are focused on whether senior UAW staff were forced to contribute to accounts originally established to buy flowers for autoworkers' funerals, and whether union leaders kept the cash.

Grimes, 65, of Fort Myers, Florida, was charged in a criminal information, which indicates a guilty plea is expected. That could give federal prosecutors another key cooperator in the ongoing investigation.

“I am aware of the charges brought against Mr. Grimes,” Grimes' lawyer Michael Manley wrote in a text to The News. “There will be no comment on the charges or any potential resolution at this time.”

Grimes has not returned calls or message left by The News since April.

The criminal case focuses on self-dealing and kickbacks allegedly paid to union leaders for awarding deals for UAW-branded trinkets, including more than $3.9 million spent on commemorative watches that were never distributed to union members.

The alleged conspiracy started in 2006 and lasted until July 2018, according to the government. During that time, Grimes worked alongside Estrada and served on the UAW-GM training center board alongside Ashton and others. He was paid $150,574 a year.

The scheme described by prosecutors involved Grimes and two unnamed union officials allegedly enriching themselves by deceptively soliciting, influencing and obtaining contracts for two vendors. One contractor, identified by the government as "Vendor A," owned a family-operated business that sold American-made custom logo products, including clothes and accessories.

The second contractor, identified as "Vendor B," was a chiropractor based in Philadelphia and southern New Jersey. The chiropractor treated one of the unnamed union officials for years.

Ashton, 71, lives in Ocean View, New Jersey.

In August 2012, the chiropractor opened a new business that purportedly sold American-made custom watches. The company's only income came from the UAW and the training center operated with GM.

During the alleged conspiracy, Grimes and the two unnamed UAW officials demanded and accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars from the two vendors, prosecutors said.

In 2006, Grimes recommended "Vendor A" provide 23,000 watches to the UAW-GM training center, according to court records. After awarding the contract, Grimes demanded a loan to buy property in Rose Township in northern Oakland County, prosecutors said. The vendor refused and Grimes threatened to cancel the watch contract, according to court records.

"Fearing economic harm to his company, Vendor A agreed to provide a mortgage for $60,000 so that Michael Grimes could buy the property," prosecutors wrote. The vendor also agreed to pay Grimes $1,800 per month for consulting work. The monthly payments rose to $3,800 per month and continued until Grimes retired in July 2018, according to the government.

Grimes also demanded bribes in exchange for not interfering with the vendor's business, according to prosecutors. To hide the bribes, the vendor wrote checks payable to "KKG Consulting," which prosecutors called a sham company. State business records show the company was created by Grimes' wife Karen in 2001.

Karen Grimes
Karen Grimes (Photo: Lee County Sheriff's Office)

From 2010 through 2017, the vendor paid Grimes almost $900,000, prosecutors said, adding that Grimes was involved in another tainted contract in 2011.

This time, an unnamed UAW official identified as "Union Official 1" proposed buying 50,000 "Team UAW-GM" jackets using training center funds. Grimes recommended steering the contract to "Vendor A," prosecutors said.

The vendor later received a $6 million contract. A second unnamed union official directed Grimes to demand an approximately $300,000 kickback for "Union Official 1" prosecutors said. The official received the money in 2012.

Grimes also demanded a $525,000 kickback and threatened to cancel the jacket contract, prosecutors said. Grimes later increased his demand and received $530,000 from the vendor, which he spent paying off property in Fenton, according to the government.

In 2016, Grimes received a $500,000 kickback from the same vendor in exchange for awarding a $5.8 million contract to provide backpacks for UAW members, prosecutors said. The money was funneled through Karen Grimes' sham company, according to the government.

Grimes also received money from another watch contract involving the Pennsylvania chiropractor, prosecutors said.

In 2012, "Union Official 1" told the chiropractor to create a new company so the UAW could buy more than 50,000 watches.

The next year, the UAW-GM training center awarded a $3.97 million contract to the vendor for 58,000 watches. In May 2013, "Union Official 1" demanded a $250,000 kickback, money that was hand-delivered to the union official's home, prosecutors said. A second UAW official also received kickbacks from the watch vendor, according to the government.

To conceal the scheme, the watch vendor wrote "antique furniture" or "furniture" in the memo line of the checks. The second UAW official split some of the money with Grimes, prosecutors said.

The watch contract kickbacks continued until fall 2016, when news broke about the federal corruption investigation involving the UAW and Fiat Chrysler.

"Union Official 1" met with the watch vendor and said "the payments had to stop because of the UAW/Fiat Chrysler investigation," prosecutors said.

The UAW-GM training center received the watches anyway. The 58,000 watches are not on UAW member wrists, however — they are being stored in a warehouse at the training center.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, June 28, 2019

JUDICIARY: H.R. 40 and the Path to Restorative Justice - Happy Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution Month - Celebrating The Day After Juneteenth - Not All Slaves Were "Black & Brown"

Related image
Not all slaves were "black & brown" based upon the
"One-drop Rule of property ownership."
The following are links to better educate the public and our public office holders in the history of stealin':


See, if the Committee, or anyone else, for that matter, speaks upon these aforementioned legal doctrines, codified, in law and policies of the land, universally embraced in maritme laws, standing fast holding up the heavens in divine law,  then, well...that would just strip away their grant of the right to bear the arms of being "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

Until someone admits that chattel law hoodwinked when it comes to the residuals of the peculiar institution, the only thing that shall be done to address what build this great nation is more stealin'.

Once again, I regret that I must share this hearing of more bleachbitting the history of my Sweetie.

Her Flatulent Boviness (HFB), Sheila Jackson Lee is co-optimizing her reparations fraud scheme, once again, by bastardizing the legacy of the Judiciary Committee, of justice, itself.

Since they ran out of TARP money and did not get caught, HFB & Co. is championing transposing the U.S. German Marshall Fund for their reparations stealin', the children, the land and the votes.

Think of all that biometric data that would be collected by private, foreign corporations to administer the "One-Drop Rule" to see who qualifies for the reparations Social Impact Bond programs through Public Private Partnerships.

I wonder if they are going to establish citizenship based upon DNA.

You can do that, you know.

Oh, the possibilities.



Happy Residuals of the Peculiar Institution Month - Celebrating the day after Juneteenth

Witnesses

Panel 1: 
The Honorable Cory Booker 
United States Senator
Panel 2: 
Mr. Ta-Nehisi Coates 
Distinguished Writer in Residence, Arthur J. Carter Journalism Institute of New York University
Mr. Danny Glover 
Actor and Activist
Ms. Katrina Browne 
Documentarian, Traces of the Trade
Mr. Coleman Hughes 
Writer, Quilette
Mr. Burgess Owens 
Speaker and Writer
Rev. Eugene Taylor Sutton 
Episcopal Bishop of Maryland
Dr. Julianne Malveaux 
Economist and Political Commentator
Mr. Eric Miller 
Professor of Law, Loyola Law School, Loyola Marymount University

Documents

116th Congress



Not all slaves looked like this, you know.

Slavery reparations could carry a $17 trillion price tag

A new bill would calculate potential costs of reparations — and by Yahoo Finance estimates, these could reach as high as $17.1 trillion.

Last week, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties held the first hearing in a decade on H.R. 40, the Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act. The bill was first introduced in 1989 by former Congressman John Conyers (D-MI). Conyers reintroduced the bill each year until his retirement in 2017 — and each year, the bill languished in Congress.

The bill’s focus was not to pass reparations, but to research the impact slavery had on black Americans and develop proposals for redress.

‘Payments are not the focus of H.R. 40’

The subject of reparations has remained a political hot potato, with presidential candidates Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Beto O’Rourke and Julian Castro supporting some form of reparations. But while the Democratic-controlled House is willing to hear the bill, it seems likely that a bill on reparations will die in the Senate where Republicans have a majority. When asked about the hearing, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said he opposed the measure, given that “not one of us currently living are responsible” for slavery.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), a sponsor of H.R. 40 — named after the 40 acres and a mule promised to freed slaves — responded to McConnell’s comments in a statement to Yahoo Finance.

The case for reparations

Activists have been calling for reparations for years, and in 2016, a UN panel declared that the U.S. owed black Americans reparations because of slavery and its link to injustices today in America.
“In particular, the legacy of colonial history, enslavement, racial subordination and segregation, racial terrorism and racial inequality in the United States remains a serious challenge, as there has been no real commitment to reparations and to truth and reconciliation for people of African descent,” the report states.

African-Americans are disproportionately targeted by the criminal justice system, accounting for 33% of the prison population, but only 12% of the adult population in the country. According to Pew Research, this is in comparison to their white counterparts who make up a third of the prison population, but over 60% of the adult population in the U.S.

But there are other disparities between the black community and their counterparts. Unemployment rates for African-Americans are twice as high as that of white workers, while black poverty rates are more than twice as high as that of their white counterparts. According to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), the black poverty rate was 22% in 2016 — the same year, it was 8.8% for white Americans. The national poverty rate, by contrast, was 12.7%.
Wealth inequality between the races has only increased throughout the years. In 2016, according to the Inequality Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, the U.S. median wealth — or the total of all assets — for white families was just under $150,000, compared to the national median wealth of $82,000. In 2016, the median figure for African-Americans stood at roughly $3,500. That’s less than half the median black wealth 35 years ago.
And though Brown v. Board of Education integrated the nation’s schools, today, they are more segregated than ever. According to a recent study by the education research group EdBuild, there is a $23 billion gap in funding between white and non-white school districts of equal size. Roughly, this means that non-white school districts receive $2,226 less on average for each enrolled student than predominately white districts.
William Darity, a public policy professor at Duke University, has researched reparations for decades. With Professor Dania Francis at UMass Amherst, their paper, “The Economics of Reparations,” notes that the United States has paid reparations to wronged communities before, including Japanese families kept in internment camps, and Native-American tribes. But, they write, “almost 250 years of domestic enslavement of African people and their descendants have not elicited a similar response from the U.S. government.”

The cost of reparations

If reparations were to be paid to descendants of slaves, it would be costly. Many researchers have tried to place a dollar figure on the economic cost associated with hundreds of years of free labor, and accumulated wealth Southerners gained from enslaving blacks. Darity and Francis argue that any reparations paid should also be tax-free, given the nearly 100 years that black people paid taxes “while being disenfranchised in the U.S. South, a paradigmatic case of ‘taxation without representation.’”
In the essay collection “Wealth of Races,” several researchers tried to calculate the cost or “present value of benefits from past injustices.” Roger Ransom and Richard Sutch calculated that cost to be $3.4 billion between 1810 and 1860. In 2019, that would come to roughly $8.5 billion.
Economist Larry Neal tried to tabulate the price tag of unpaid wages to slaves from 1620 to 1840. In 1983 when he calculated the number, he estimated that slaves were owed $1.4 trillion in unpaid wages, or $3.6 trillion today. Economist James Marketti estimated that unpaid wages totaled somewhere between $3 trillion and $5 trillion dollars — again in 1983. Today, when accounting for inflation that number leaps to $7.7 trillion to $12.9 trillion.

But these costs do not include the lingering economic impact of Jim Crow and current discrimination that black people face in the labor market, health care system, or education and criminal justice systems. According to “The Economics of Reparations,” that figure stands at an additional $1.3 trillion to $4.2 trillion today. When totaling Marketti’s estimates along with restitution costs for racial injustice since the end of slavery, reparations could range from $9 to $17.1 trillion.
“Suffice it to say,” Darity and Francis write, “the damages to the collective well-being of black people have been enormous and, correspondingly, so is the appropriate bill.”

Paying reparations

But are reparations possible? H.R. 40 aims to determine just that. First, the U.S. government would have to determine who is eligible for reparations, and then figure out how to pay for it.
There have been different reparation proposals made through the years, and historically the U.S. has paid restitution to groups that have suffered injustices at the hands of the government. Reparations proposals have run the gamut from lump-sum payouts to a “trust fund” that could be used to finance black Americans’ pursuit of higher education or home purchases. Other options include reparations modeled after Germany’s postwar restitution plan, which combined both individual payments with financing institutions and resettlement of Jewish people in Israel.

It’s unclear how a sum as potentially as large as $17.1 trillion would be financed. Darity’s research posits that it could be financed through additional taxes, or by issuing bonds. But Darity and Francis make clear that “African-Americans should not bear the tax burden of financing their own reparations payments.”
Though H.R. 40 is seeing the light of the debate floor, the measure is still deeply unpopular. According to a 2016 Marist poll, only 26% of Americans support reparations. More than 80% of white Americans disapprove of restitution to African-Americans, while nearly 60% of black Americans support the proposal.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©