Showing posts with label Marcia Lowry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marcia Lowry. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 2, 2019

Marcia Lowry, A Better Childhood, Parental Rights & Their Juridic Acts Of Trafficking Tiny Humans

By Order of the Highest Authority, in preparation for the rollout, I have been instructed to close out the "Cocktails & Popcorn" Phase and proceed to the final battle ground to find out who are the ones to define the maximization of revenues by re-animating the residuals of the peculiar institution in claiming mastery of the legal arguments for parental rights, but in this instance, these are corporate parental rights.

Yes, the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) are launching Foster Care 2.0, where you will soon need a license to give birth, for the goods of the birth belong to the foreign corporations.

The Dark Money Of Children's Rights, Clinton Foundation & Perkins Coie

Marcia Lowry seems to no longer be with Children's Rights, which I still take severe issue with the groundbreaking attorney fees awarded by Nancy Edmunds almost 10 years ago inn Michigan, where the case continues to linger in a perpetual state of attorney fee billing and SACWIS improvements, on top of more improvements, because she has started up a new gig.

A Better Childhood
http://www.abetterchildhood.org/

Marcia Lowry
Marcia Robinson Lowry is the Founder and Executive Director of A Better Childhood. Ms. Lowry is the pioneering architect of the body of law that protects the country’s most vulnerable children. Her work sheds light on the deficiencies of our country’s long-unaccountable child welfare systems. Using the power of the courts, her work is focused on developing and implementing realistic, long-term solutions to ensure that abused and neglected children have a chance for a better childhood. 
Ms. Lowry created ABC in 2014 to develop new and innovative approaches to helping children who have been left to languish and suffer. In so doing, she continues her career-long advocacy for children. Before creating ABC, Ms. Lowry served as Founder and Executive Director of Children’s Rights for almost twenty years.  She previously was the director of the Children’s Rights Projects of the New York Civil Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union. 
Collaborating with policy analysts, experts, local organizations and government officials, Ms. Lowry leverages the justice system to reform child welfare programs. As the lead lawyer in class-action cases in eighteen jurisdictions across the country, Ms. Lowry’s work has improved the lives of hundreds of thousands of children. Currently, she is active in reform efforts in New York City, Texas, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oklahoma, the District of Columbia and New Jersey. Her lawsuits lead to increased oversight of child welfare agencies and influence multiple jurisdictions’ allocations of billions of dollars. Most importantly, her advocacy results in better outcomes for children and families. Obviously, this is a blatant lie considering the fact that the Michigan case is still lingering and all of her other initiatives at Children's Rights never, ever gave any resolution to the children who were drugged, beaten, raped, attempted suicide and successfully attempted suicide, and victims of child trafficking.
FUN FACT! NOT ONE FOSTER CHILD HAS EVER BEEN AWARDED A PENNY FOR BEING A VICTIM OF DRUGGING AS LAB RATS, BEATINGS, RAPE, TORTURE FROM CHILDREN'S RIGHTS LAWSUITS

So, now comes the licensing for parental rights as parents being relatives of the child who is under the legal aegis of the state, where guardianship is transferred to the corporate parent through human asset management NGOs for the forfeiting of the children's legacies to be loaded up on their foreign corporate UCC cargo ship, filled lots and lots of children's trust funds from stealin' from Medicaid.

The battle for control of the residuals of the peculiar institution is in full force in the courts, but in this instance, since A Better Childhood, a foreign corporation registered as a domestic nonprofit under a fictitious name, is out Chappaqua, New York, registered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, that started out Florida.

Large
https://opencorporates.com/statements/570666864
Selected Entity Name: A BETTER CHILDHOOD, INC.
Selected Entity Status Information
Current Entity Name: A BETTER CHILDHOOD, INC.
DOS ID #: 4637882
Initial DOS Filing Date: SEPTEMBER 17, 2014
County: WESTCHESTER
Jurisdiction: NEW YORK
Entity Type: DOMESTIC NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION
Current Entity Status: ACTIVE

Selected Entity Address Information
DOS Process (Address to which DOS will mail process if accepted on behalf of the entity)
A BETTER CHILDHOOD, INC.
C/O FREDERIC DORWART, LAWYERS
124 EAST FOURTH STREET
Large
https://opencorporates.com/statements/515330091
TULSA, OKLAHOMA, 74103
Registered Agent
NONE

This office does not record information regarding the names and addresses of officers, shareholders or directors of nonprofessional corporations except the chief executive officer, if provided, which would be listed above. Professional corporations must include the name(s) and address(es) of the initial officers, directors, and shareholders in the initial certificate of incorporation, however this information is not recorded and only available by viewing the certificate.

Large
https://opencorporates.com/statements/511307034
*Stock Information
# of Shares Type of Stock $ Value per Share
  No Information Available
*Stock information is applicable to domestic business corporations.

Name History
Filing Date Name Type Entity Name
SEP 17, 2014 Actual A BETTER CHILDHOOD, INC.
A Fictitious name must be used when the Actual name of a foreign entity is unavailable for use in New York State. The entity must use the fictitious name when conducting its activities or business in New York State.

NOTE: New York State does not issue organizational identification numbers.

It seems Marcia Lowry is the only paid employee at $200,000 a year to sue the states for the purposes of injecting another layer of predatory administrative services, in what looks like legal move to force the creation of their latest and greatest solution to procure contracts, probably for ABC, for the child welfare system.

https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2016/472/004/2016-472004064-0e9eb8d8-9.pdf
In this instance, I see the next trend in privatization of parental rights in the form of parental licensing for the acquisition of goods, or rather human assets.


I also see Hillary Clinton because she renewed her law license.

Lawsuit: W.Va.'s child foster care system is failing children

Charleston — Advocates filed a class action lawsuit against West Virginia officials Tuesday, alleging that while the state is quick to terminate parental rights, it doesn't have adequate foster families and adoptive homes in which to place those children. Often, children sleep in hotel rooms or in DHHR offices.

In turn, the state's child welfare system is putting about 7,000 foster children at heightened risk of someday experiencing homelessness, mental health problems, incarceration and addiction, according to the lawsuit, which advocates said they planned to file at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday in the Huntington Division of the Southern District of West Virginia.

A Better Childhood, a national nonprofit advocacy group that wages court battles on behalf of children; Disability Rights of West Virginia, a federally funded nonprofit; and the West Virginia law firm Shaffer and Shaffer allege that West Virginia's Department of Health and Human Resources has "repeatedly failed the children they are charged with protecting."

Plaintiffs alleged that without adequate suitable homes, DHHR segregates children in institutions, lodges them in temporary shelter care, places them in overcrowded foster care homes, or places them in poorly screened kinship foster homes.

"We're not seeking money damages," said Marcia Robinson Lowry, executive director of A Better Childhood. "We're seeking for things to change going forward – that the government must take care of these kids."

The lawsuit names Gov. Jim Justice, DHHR Cabinet Secretary Bill Crouch, DHHR Deputy Secretary Jeremiah Samples, and DHHR Commissioner of the Bureau for Children and Families Linda Watts as defendants. Plaintiffs filed the lawsuit "on behalf of all children who are now, or will be, in the custody of DHHR."

DHHR officials were not aware of the lawsuit Monday.

DHHR officials have said that West Virginia has about 7,000 kids in state custody, and that the number has increased by 67 percent since 2013. During that time, the number increased nationally by 11 percent, according to DHHR.

DHHR officials have publicly said the state's child welfare system was overwhelmed by the addiction epidemic. But according to the lawsuit, the state's child welfare system was "already strained and mismanaged."

"The drug epidemic was not the root of the problem but rather toppled an already fractured system," the lawsuit states. "The public statements display a lack of accountability but nonetheless, clearly acknowledge that the system is in fact in crisis."

The lawsuit says that recruiting foster families is difficult in the state because "DHHR caseworkers routinely exclude foster parents from MDT meetings, verbally threaten to remove children from foster parents’ care when they engage in any sort of advocacy that challenges the caseworkers’ orders, are difficult to contact in crisis situations (such as when consent is needed for medical or behavioral health care), and often speak disrespectfully towards foster parents." MDT meetings are multi-disciplinary team meetings, where case workers, prosecuting attorneys, parents, lawyers and others meet to address familial problems that led to abuse and neglect.

Some foster parents are also selective about the children they will accept.

The lawsuit states that DHHR has "an insufficient placement array, an insufficient number of placement resources, and an insufficient number of homes that are willing to accept older children, children with severe behavioral issues, and large sibling groups."

Meanwhile, West Virginia is quick to terminate parental rights, frequently within months after the child is placed with a foster family, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit states that in 2013, there were 1,040 terminations, and 1,988 in 2017.

Meanwhile, the number of adoptions in the state has not kept up, according to the lawsuit, "leading to more children becoming legal orphans, frequently left in institutional settings."

In turn, children are routinely shuffled "from temporary placement to temporary placement, disregarding their unique needs," according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit states that frequent moves while in foster care are associated with maltreatment, poorer educational outcomes and increased mental health issues.

Adolescent children are at higher risk of substance abuse, juvenile arrests and failing out of school, according to the lawsuit.

One 11-year-old girl, with Down syndrome, was removed from her parents after they were arrested for habitually failing to send her to school. She was placed with an aunt, then in two foster homes. Now, state officials plan to send her to The Potomac Center in Romney, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit says that in 2017, "formal allegations were filed against the facility claiming that, among other abuses, the disabled residents did not receive the services the facility claimed to offer and they failed to hire, train and supervise their employees adequately.

"Separately, as a result of an ongoing criminal investigation, state police have claimed that Potomac Center staff abused 12 children, ages seven to 17, subjecting them to physical, sexual, and psychological abuse, including inhumane and degrading treatment by some employees of the Potomac Center, Inc. facility," the lawsuit states.

Four senior administrators were charged with failing to report the abuse.

In another case, a boy was sent from living with his abusive mother to his abusive aunt's, according to the lawsuit. He suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder.

Plaintiffs say that due to the increase in foster children, state officials are placing more children in kinship care, meaning in the care of a relative. About half are in kinship care.

But according to the lawsuit, those families don't receive the $600 monthly payment that certified families do, and DHHR officials dissuade them from becoming certified. Because they aren't certified, their homes are not subject to the same safety regulations, the lawsuit says.

"Upon information and belief, DHHR regularly discourages kinship caregivers from seeking foster home certification by either failing to inform them of their option to become certified, or by 'warning' them that they will likely not meet the certification requirements and may instead risk losing the foster children if they seek certification," the lawsuit states.

Nearly 20 percent aren't licensed, according to the lawsuit.

"Those are bad numbers," said Robinson Lowry. "They're very bad numbers and we really do think something needs to be done and probably nothing's going to be done unless this lawsuit does it."

Plaintiffs are also suing about over-reliance on out-of-state facilities. The lawsuit states that DHHR is spending approximately $41,181,775 per year to place children in out-of-state congregate care facilities "that are too frequently the subject of investigations that confirm rampant sexual, physical, and emotional abuse at the hands of employees who are undertrained and not properly screened."

In 2015, the Department of Justice sent then-Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin a letter, stating that West Virginia was keeping too many kids with serious mental health problems far from their homes, in residential facilities and psychiatric hospitals, often out of state. That violated a U.S. Supreme Court decision that found segregation of people with disabilities is discrimination.

In May of this year, state and federal officials announced they had reached a memorandum of understanding, and that West Virginia officials had agreed to expand services meant to keep those children at home and in care in their own communities.

According to the agreement, West Virginia has agreed to begin screening children on Medicaid, those who are in the care of the state, including foster children, and those who reside in juvenile justice facilities, to determine whether the new services could be of help. State officials would then offer new services covered by Medicaid, including a mobile crisis team, and in-home visits by mental health care providers.

Plaintiffs argue that a goal, of a 25 percent reduction of the June 2015 number of children in residential placement by 2022, is too low, and that the MOU is "self-enforcing" with "little to no oversight."

They want DHHR to contract with an outside entity to conduct a needs assessment of the state's foster care system. They also want DHHR to develop a plan for ensuring CPS workers don't handle more than 15 cases, that DHHR keeps written plans for each child with the goal of finding that child a permanent home or be reunited with his or her family, that kinship families are safe and properly trained, and to increase the availability of community-based mental health care for children.

The lawsuit also states that DHHR doesn't employ enough child welfare workers, that it fails to "adequately" screen their applicants for criminal backgrounds or drug use, and experiences high turn-over. Plaintiffs say that a 2013 audit recommended exit interviews to reduce turn-over, but DHHR ignored that recommendation.

In January 2019, 213 positions were vacant, amounting to a 45 percent vacancy rate among caseworkers, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit states that while The Child Welfare League of America, a coalition of private and public agencies that develops child welfare policies, recommends CPS workers shouldn't handle more than 12 to 15 clients at a time, it "is not uncommon" for West Virginia CPS workers to handle 50 cases.

Inadequate staffing results in "less time to interact with children, families, and service providers or to provide meaningful and appropriate case plans, necessary services, and timely casework and decision-making around issues such as permanency planning," the lawsuit states.

Case workers also fail to prepare foster children for adult life, according to the lawsuit, putting them at higher risk of premature pregnancy and incarceration.

"Rather, caseworkers attempt to plan for the transition out of foster care when youth are on the verge of aging out, sometimes as late as weeks before a teen’s 18th birthday," the lawsuit states. "Without any plan in place, young people are being dropped off at homeless shelters."


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, August 11, 2019

Statement Of Stephanie Jezowski On The Decade Lingering Nancy Edmund Case Of Children's Rights v. Michigan Child Welfare System

The following links are introductions to the history of the soon to be two decades long case on the horrors of Michigan Child Welfare System in the Michigan Eastern District Court, Nancy Edmunds, presiding.

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=children%27s+rights

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=nancy+edmunds

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=stephanie+jezowski

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=sacwis

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=OCO

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=MCI

Dear Governor Whitmer, Attorney General Nessel, and other members of the Legislature,

I am reaching out to you all today with the hope that discussions can finally take place about some very serious issues within the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.  As someone that has been working with families for a number of years that are involved with CPS and by means of my own investigating, I must make you all aware of the situation.

I have sent this document to the court and parties involved in the Dwayne B. lawsuit filed by Children's Rights and intend to follow up with Federal agencies as well.  I would have provided far more, but current state laws do not allow me to do so and without legal permission, I can only relay what I know and have come across.

While the last year we have heard horror stories about how immigrant kids are being ripped from their families and the permanent damage that it does to them, the same thing is happening right in our own backyards and it is not getting any attention.  Why is that? I can think of several reasons with the primary one being the fallacy that MDHHS propagates that they only get involved and remove kids when it is truly necessary.  That gets compounded by the fact that investigations get derailed by their privacy claims yet you all can have people sign waivers to help get families food stamps, Medicaid and work out Disability issues.  How is health information any less sensitive?  And why in the last year, have two separate entities with one being the Auditor General had to sue to get information that they are allowed to have?

As you will see in my Notice, the reason seems to be that the Department has far too much to hide and that Child Welfare is in worse shape than anyone has been allowed to know.  We are talking at least half a dozen deaths because of their failures that I have been able to find, and there are likely far more.  That doesn't include the two adult deaths that happened in two murder suicides that took the lives of 4 children.  There are other considerable failures that also need to be addressed.

It was my goal to summarize as best as possible and to show how there are consistent issues that no one seems to be properly addressing and that includes the Judicial Branch and Departments such as MDHHS, the State Court Administrator's Office, Office of Children's Ombudsman and other safety measures that have allegedly been put in place.  However, having years of information stored up and not being able to refer to documents I had to describe what is going on and it ended up being considerably longer than planned.  You will want to set aside some time to read and consider what is contained within it because so many things depend on legislators calling MDHHS to the table to get control back and proper oversight of their operations put in place.

I will not sugar coat what is happening and some of what you read will be hard to stomach and even to believe, part of that is because MDHHS has become a master of propaganda and hiding the reality of what is going on.  Most of you will never have had an encounter with CPS; count yourself very lucky and accept that you really don't have an understanding of what it is like to deal with them.  I would have to make an educated guess that even fewer have sat through court proceedings in a CPS case and it is time that you do so.  Ask questions, expect to get very few answers.  When you get answers, ask to see the data itself that merits the response you get; don't be surprised if you are told you cannot see it because, apparently, just numbers are considered violating privacy.

I, personally, expect to see some kind of retaliation in response to all of this.  To what degree is unknown.  Someone may look in the system and see children living with us and make a random call to CPS when there are no children in our home.  Anything could happen and I expect it to come mainly from Arenac County because I have called them out specifically in my notice.  Why?  Because they are not following laws or policies, are changing court documents after they are filed, not properly placing complaints into the system, they have tried to have a family "swatted" based on  so-called evidence they likely obtained from a wiretap or electronic surveillance that they had no reason to be doing  They have placed children in non-licensed foster homes that no one knows how they got there, they predetermine cases with the judge as it would appear, the list goes on.  They will also work overtime to discredit me and anyone else that speaks out about the county but I have my proofs in order.  The problem is that I cannot legally share them with any of you.  We need a law immediately that allows families to share documents with legislators without penalty so that you all can see what is going on.  The only things that can currently be shared are things like newspaper articles and other publicly available information.

The time to protect your most vulnerable constituents is now.  It can only be done through action and that requires listening and investigation by you and your staffs.  Ask yourselves, why has the state been in this lawsuit for more than 10 years with little forward progress and now a $230,000,000 computer program has to be scrapped and a new one implemented?  If the computer system is so bad, how can anything coming from it be trusted?  Why are workers not telling parents who have concerns of abuse and neglect in foster homes to report it to central intake?  Far too many questions and not enough acceptable answers.  A word of caution: I have heard reports of legislators being bribed or threatened in various ways when they attempt to take on MDHHS so be prepared to report any and all of it to the proper authorities.  Record conversations that you have with their staff or anyone that reaches out to you on their behalf.  Do so without disclosing you are doing so because that is one of the few ways you will have to protect yourself.  This is not legal advice, but it is advice given to me by an attorney when we were dealing with CPS.

It must also be made known that by not providing appropriate or adequate services and by lying on petitions while claiming Federal funds, MDHHS could very well be committing massive and widespread fraud for CPATA, ASFA and Social Security funds in addition to Medicaid funds.  In addition, the Health Department is illegally trying to find ways around the FERPA laws when it comes to vaccine waivers.  As such, the state is wide open to Federal lawsuits to recover funds as well as being placed in Federal Receivership if these matters are not immediately addressed and a Federal Investigation is done.

I am happy to answer any questions you have to the best of my ability and if I do not immediately have the answer, I will do my best to get answers for you.  If you all can get legislation passed to allow parents to share case documents with you, I can get you more than enough parents to share their cases with you so that you can see firsthand what is truly going on in Child Welfare.  I am also willing to do what I can to be a part of the solution moving forward, I don't want to be just another person complaining.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Jezowski
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, April 23, 2019

Massachusetts Audit Blames Bouncing Foster Kids For The Need Of A Tiny Human Asset Management Tracking System - Happy Child Abuse Propaganda Month

As we begin to close out the celebration for Child Abuse Propaganda Month, let us pay tribute to Massachusetts and its history in trafficking tiny humans.

Yes, there is more to Child Abuse Propaganda Month than just blue pinwheels money hustle because May is Foster Care Propaganda Month.

In order to acquire goods for the child welfare industry, one must have pretty, shiny reports showing that a state's foster care system need more money.

At the time I pulled the pretty colored fact sheet of the report, the report has yet to be uploaded to the state databases, so you can keep checking back for it.
Educational Stability for Students in Foster Care  
The Department's Educational Stability team works to ensure the enrollment, attendance and opportunity to succeed in school for children and youth in foster care. We collaborate with the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families (DCF) and local school districts to implement the provisions for providing educational stability for students in foster care, as outlined in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).
In the spirit of fuchsia....


Auditor concerned that communication issues hurt foster children’s education 

Department of Children and Families workers leave the Dorchester DCF office holding hands with a child.
What bouncing tiny humans for money looks like

Foster children often bounce from school to school, suffer chronic absenteeism, experience disciplinary problems, and drop out more frequently than their peers.

Bouncing from school to school is a modern term for trafficking tiny humans.  When one is legally kidnapped from their family, you have a tendency of disciplinary problems that are remedied with lots and lots of second generation antipsychotropics for testing.

Yet poor communication between state child welfare administrators and local schools and conflicting regulations create significant hurdles and educational delays for abused and neglected children as they are moved from foster home to foster home, according to a new state auditor’s report.

Poor communication is called privacy.  Child welfare is all compartmentalized because each department has its own private contractor fraud scheme they know nothing about because the child placing agencies are all outsourced to self-report and no one is going to dry snitch on themselves.

Amid the communication and coordination roadblocks, low-income communities often end up shouldering the financial burden for educating these children, the report said.

Poverty is abuse and neglect, which is why the Medicaid billable term is called Targeted Case Management, where they target poor communities, which means the communities lose appropriations due to forced migration.  These kids are typically lumped into school districts that are stressed for resources, for loss of funding, and throw their hands in the air when it comes to providing these kids any form of help in knowing they will be "bounced" in a few days.

“Too often, the educational success of these students is hindered by a complex bureaucracy and a lack of resources and expertise, and this burden is particularly acute in low-income communities,” state Auditor Suzanne M. Bump said in a statement. Last year, about 6,800 public school students in Massachusetts were in foster care and state education data indicate that about 45 percent of students in foster care require special education services.

FUN FACT! INVOLUNTARY PLACEMENT OF A CHILD IN FOSTER CARE IS THE ONLY WAY TO ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR MOST CHILDREN

See how the pretty shiny report fails to mention this, below.

School districts devote “considerable time and effort to ensuring that children in foster care are receiving the right educational services,” the report said.

School districts, not the child placing agencies or the state, devotes services.  Please take note of this burden for lack of replenished resources.

But it said some school districts report they receive inconsistent information from the Department of Children and Families, the state’s child welfare agency, while others say they receive no notice from DCF when a student in foster care arrives or leaves their district.

The school districts called the information they receive form DCF "inconsistent".  How cute.  I prefer the term fraudulent.  Alot of times DCF will have multiple identities for the kids to bill.  When a kid is adopted, the name changes, along with everything else, meaning there is no record.

“Several districts reported that they have informed DCF that a foster student has been absent from school (sometimes for periods in excess of 40 days), only to find that DCF has not acted on that report, or has not acted promptly to work with the district on the absenteeism issue,” it said.

No one acts on the reports of missing children because SACWIS, the human asset management system is a joke.

The report noted that these communication gaps can mean students endure duplicative testing and assessments that delay placement in an appropriate educational setting, while increasing the cost of providing the services.

And duplicate billing, double billing, phantom billing.....

“These children tend to bounce around from one community to another and there is no good way to track their educational history, let alone their personal history, so when they arrive at a local school district, the district is starting from scratch,” said Tom Scott, executive director of the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents.

Ooooo...what a great argument to advocate for tagging and tracking tiny human assets with chip!

Baker administration officials said in response to Bump’s report that the state education department provides training to schools, districts, and DCF staff, aimed at minimizing transitions in education for students in foster care.

The schools and districts are not the problem.  It is the entire child welfare system. It needs to be dismantled and purged of all the nefarious actors who exist in the private spear, monetizing our children for the best interests of their foreign corporate investments in Social Impact Bonds. I would place a heavily weighted responsibility upon Mitt Romney for this.

Administration officials added that Governor Charlie Baker’s education funding proposal filed in January includes an expansion of counseling and psychological services for schools, which would benefit children in foster care.

But what does that do for a kid who is being bounced?

“While our offices will carefully review the full report, many of the auditor’s recommendations are already implemented or underway,” said a statement from the Executive Offices of Education and Health and Human Services. “The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Department of Children and Families have strengthened collaboration and communication between the two agencies and local school districts, including issuing joint guidance in 2018 and all stakeholders continue to strengthen communication and coordination to better support school districts.”

Bump’s report suggests that DCF and the state education department, known as DESE, collaborate on creating and maintaining an electronic “dynamic list” of students in foster care to improve tracking, but also for analysis of trends and for future financial planning. She also recommends the state create an “electronic backpack,” a database that would allow school districts to quickly access education information on foster children.

Someone is going to make a whole bunch of money.  I wonder which tax exempt foreign corporation will be the lucky ones to get the first contract?  Backpacks are a popular idea when it comes to trafficking tiny humans, and other humans around them, and hacking computer systems in the schools you know.

The report does not indicate which state agencies should pay for these initiatives.

Have no fear! Someone will have a child welfare NGO pitch some more pretty shiny brochures, with a really cool website, to pitch the Medicaid contract to implement human assent management systems.  You know they like to start tracking humans at pre-birth, now-a-days.



Happy Child Abuse Propaganda Month

The report notes that providing educational services to foster children poses a “financial strain” on local schools that is not offset by local tax revenue or state funding. The state pays some money toward educating these students, but the report said it’s not clear whether this reflects “the true cost” for local districts.

We still function on the arcane system of administrative operations in chattels.

Bump’s warning about the lack of adequate education funding for foster children comes as the state Legislature is engaged in a broader debate about how to boost state aid to school districts across Massachusetts.

Broader debate is called litigation.  Massachusetts has an issue with stealin' in its Children's Trust Fund.

Bump also suggests DCF and DESE should jointly provide training to DCF social workers and local school district staff on how to collaborate to make the best decisions for foster children’s educational placements, and for sharing information.

I have a much more economical response.  STOP STEALIN' TINY HUMANS!

Local school districts also are struggling to transport foster children to and from school, and to pay those costs, as foster children often are enrolled in one school district but live in another, the report said. Federal law requires that changes in school placements for students in foster care be minimized to lessen their trauma, and that unless it’s determined to be in their best interest, children should remain in the school district they were in prior to foster care.

Minimization and lessening of trauma for children in foster care is called "drugging children".  It is far more profitable and compassionate to chemically constrain a kid.

To meet those transportation needs, schools reported spending a total of $3.2 million just last year, the report said.

Yet DCF officials told Bump’s office that the department’s social workers are also dedicating a significant chunk of their time, sometimes as much as 40 percent of their time, transporting children to school or family visits.

I would say make a special division to assist the workers to transport the children and the parents to all the services they need to keep the child out the system.

To address the financial concerns, Bump called on the state to cover the full cost of transportation for foster children.

Good. Tap into those foreign children's trust funds bank accounts.  It is their money. Give it back.

The toll on children from this instability is considerable. Bump’s report said studies have found foster students lost from three months to one year of academic achievement each time they are moved to another school.

Children's Rights, a group I really have no respect for their work, as it is nothing but a attorney fees grifter scam, did nothing but get a federal monitoring contract for which you can clearly see, in this state, pretty shiny brochure, that not a damn thing has been done for the children, except for more money to be demanded.


The money spent on this litigation and monitoring could have gone to helping "The Poors" so the children would not have to be legally kidnapped.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Why Michigan Child Welfare System Sucks - SACWIS Is Run By The Foreign Corporation UNISYS & No One Is Willing To Talk About What Happens To The Data

I need someone to explain to me why the State of Michigan Department of Health and Human Services is not under federal receivership.

Reports on Michigan child welfare ‘depressing,’ says judge

Not one penny went to help the parents who raise their kids in state manufactured poverty that is legally considered abuse and neglect.

The only thing Children's Rights has done is bill the State of Michigan for attorney fees and oversight contract monitoring that has done absolutely nothing.

Not once has the Nancy Edmunds Court mentioned UNISYS, the private, foreign corporation that keeps one billing, and billing, and billing for a jacked up system that they are trying really hard to set up that jacked up predictive modeling for the purposes of having a go to database for asset forfeiture to the corporate parent, who, in this instance, we have no idea, because it is a foreign corporation.

Children have no civil rights when it comes to privatized foreign corporations doing human services in Michigan.

Perhaps, someone in that Children's Rights case could ask Peter Altabef or Shalabh Gupta if they could shed some light about their understanding that these errors in SACWIS are called rape, torture, suicide, and result in modern human trafficking.

Who knows, maybe Michigan will one day be under federal receivership so we could just pull all the data and financial transaction to find out why we even need a child welfare system and what they do with the data.

State of Michigan Taps Unisys to Build New Child Welfare Services System

Unisys will design and maintain integrated system to meet new data quality and information-sharing requirements

    The new contract was awarded in the first quarter of this year and will run three years, and the State of Michigan may extend it for two additional one-year periods at its discretion. This contract has a value of approximately $30 million, and the State may order additional services that could bring the total potential value of the contract to approximately $47 million. ~ 2011

Troubled DHHS software improves

And, while MiSACWIS cost about $18 million more than the original contract, Wheaton said those expenses were all planned and unrelated to any bugs: A $10.6 million second-year contract extension with Unisys Corp., the Pennsylvania-based company that built the software, and about $7 million to add the state’s juvenile justice and County Child Care Fund agencies into the system. 
Some 8,000 people in public and private agencies use the software. ~ 2015 

Yes, private, foreign corporations have access to our children's data and they use it for fraudulent billing in Medicaid through foster care and adoption.


DUNS:  005358932     CAGE Code:  09975    Status:  Active
801 Lakeview Dr Ste 100
Blue Bell, PA, 19422-1961 ,
UNITED STATES

Expiration Date:  10/03/2019
NAICS: 334111 - Electronic Computer Manufacturing
The name of the FOREIGN PROFIT CORPORATION:   UNISYS CORPORATION

The prior true name in home state: BURROUGHS CORPORATION changed on: 12-05-1986
The prior true name in home state: BURROUGHS DELAWARE INCORPORATED changed on: 06-28-1984

Entity type:   FOREIGN PROFIT CORPORATION
Identification Number: 800990841Old ID Number: 605095

Date of Qualification in Michigan:   04/02/1984

Incorporated under the laws of: the state of Delaware


Term: Perpetual

Most Recent Annual Report: 2018Most Recent Annual Report with Officers & Directors:   2018

The name and address of the Resident Agent:
Resident Agent Name:CSC-LAWYERS INCORPORATING SERVICE (COMPANY)
Street Address:601 ABBOT ROAD
Apt/Suite/Other:
City:EAST LANSING, MI 48823State:MI


   

The Officers and Directors of the Corporation:
TitleNameAddress
PRESIDENTPETER ALTABEF801 LAKEVIEW DRIVE,
SUITE 100 BLUEBELL, PA 19422 USA
TREASURERSHALABH GUPTA801 LAKEVIEW DRIVE,
SUITE 100 BLUEBELL, PA 19422 USA
SECRETARYGERALD KENNEY801 LAKEVIEW DRIVE,
SUITE 100 BLUEBELL, PA 19422 USA
DIRECTORLEE ROBERTS801 LAKEVIEW DRIVE,
SUITE 100 BLUEBELL, PA 19422 USA
Total Authorized Shares:  140,000,000
Shares Attributable to Michigan:  3,265,920
Most Recent Apportionment %:  2.0600%
Year Ending: 2016

These flaws in SACWIS lead to the trauma of children being legally kidnapped, drugged, raped, tortured, suicided, murdered, and a substantial maximization of profits.

Someone needs to be held accountable.

Someone needs to stop this madness.

Report: Flawed state software program could hurt Michigan children


Shalabh Gupta
Shalabh Gupta, UNISYS Corporation, Treasurer
(There are lots of Shalabh Gupta's out there)
[The face of a man who cares about profits over kids]
Correction: This article has been updated to reflect that the Michigan Department of Health & Human Services will take until June 27 to decide how to respond to a report recommending it replace a $231-million computer system. A spokesman provided incorrect information for an earlier version of this article.

LANSING — The computer system Michigan child welfare workers use to track neglect and abuse cases is deeply flawed and could lead to issues that hurt children and families, a report released Wednesday in federal court states.

The report recommended Michigan abandon the computer program, which has "persistent and significant defects" despite $231 million in state and federal investment in the program since it launched in 2014.

The Michigan Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System, or MiSACWIS, is used for cases in the state's child protective services, foster care, adoption, licensing and juvenile justice system.

Peter Altabef
Peter Altabef, UNISYS President
"[Michigan] should procure or develop a new child welfare information system that does not rely, in any significant way, on the infrastructure, design, and data model of the current MiSACWIS," the report states.

DHHS will study the report in coming weeks to decide how to address the issues, an official said.

"We know MiSACWIS has major problems, as the court report and the hearing highlighted," said Geralyn Lasher, senior deputy director for external relations and communications at DHHS.  
"The court has given us until June 27 to determine the appropriate next steps. We will take that time to do so."

Report follows 10+ years of court oversight

Federal court monitors continue to review the quality of the Michigan's child welfare programs, which came under court oversight after the settlement of a 2006 class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of children in the foster system who attorneys argued were mistreated in state care.

Last year, Judge Nancy Edmunds ordered a review of MiSACWIS because poor data quality had "prevented, delayed or stymied efforts by court monitors to verify the state's progress" in improving its child welfare system, according to the report written by consultant Kurt Heisler.

In the report, Heisler highlighted four key issues with MiSACWIS: 
  • Flawed design and launch causing continued problems. Those problems include "an unmanageable backlog of defects, incidents, and data fixes that are likely to persist indefinitely, inhibit effective casework, contribute to data entry errors, negatively affect outcomes for children and families, and impact MDHHS's ability to collect and report accurate and timely ... data for both the monitors and field staff.
  • Conflict hindering fixes. There is "significant conflict and tension" between the software integration team and Children's Services Agency, which have made it difficult for caseworkers to improve MiSACWIS.
  • Not enough time to fix backlogs. Developers don't have the time or resources to find or fix the root causes of problems with MiSACWIS.
  • Not enough time for quality review. Limited resources, a big workload and tight deadlines means there isn't time available for workers to run quality assurance checks. 
Although he recommended developing an entirely new system, Heisler said Michigan could fix the current system and update it to match a newer federal model.

New report, old problems

The department launched MiSACWIS in April 2014, pitching it as an improved, "real-time" case management tool child welfare workers would use for CPS, foster care and adoption cases.
The tool was supposed to make it easier for those workers to monitor cases, track progress and services offered to clients and ensure better safety for children. It was supposed to help more than 6,000 DHHS, private agency and court workers share case data.

Three years after its launch, state auditors uncovered problems with the MiSACWIS system. They reported the state did not properly merge records in MiSACWIS before launching the program, left 208 child welfare cases unassigned, issued thousands of potentially inaccurate payments and more.
Auditors again pointed to problems with MiSACWIS in a report issued last year. They reported workers were inconsistent in documenting case work in the system, the system did not retain certain documents and inaccurately filled in information about the risks children faced, among others.
DHHS officials announced they would make changes to protocol late last year in response to that audit, including implementing a thorough checklist they said will ensure case workers follow department protocol and document their work.

Those changes are not related to MiSACWIS, Wheaton said.

The state's response

On Wednesday, department officials said they are making changes to address the flaws highlighted in court, including:
  • Providing financial incentives for relatives to become licensed foster parents
  • Strengthen review at local child welfare offices of maltreatment that occurs while children are in foster care
  • Add oversight of child abuse and neglect complaints that don't meet the criteria for investigation under state law
DHHS director Robert Gordon, who was appointed in January, said child welfare workers can use data to improve their work despite the problems with MiSACWIS.

"Our staff are deeply dedicated to serving children and families in crisis," he said in a press release. "They need the tools and the systems to succeed. That’s what we must offer them."
Wheaton said the department will determine how it will fix the MiSACWIS program before the next court hearing, scheduled June 27.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©