Showing posts with label Ken Starr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ken Starr. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 8, 2020

Linda Tripp Has Been Extracted From Humanity

Linda Tripp ran the Monica Lewinsky operation to redirect Whitewater in a series of absolute chaos of a sex scandal, between two legally consenting adults, to function as a distraction for the Adoption Safe Families Act (ASFA) and the Personal Work Responsibility Opportunity Reauthorizaiton Act (PRWORA), and it all started in Detroit.

Listen to Linda not talk about what is known as the corporate parent of the Arkansas Development Finance Authority, the fake ass parent of the Detroit Land Bank Authority.

You were mean to my Sweetie, which is never a good thing to do, now is it, Bitch Boy?

Where is Julian Epstein, of whom I prefer my own appellation of Slimy, Slime, Slime?

"Come out, come out, wherever you are..."

Where is George Bush?

These "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) attempted to run the exact, same, damn scheme in Detroit.

Idiots.


All Hail The Whistleblowers: Happy Whistleblower Day Greetings From Linda Tripp's FCPA Psyop



#perkinscoiesucks

#maytheheavensfall

Linda Tripp, whose tapes were pivotal in Clinton impeachment scandal, dies

(CNN)Linda Tripp, who secretly recorded her conversations with Monica Lewinsky about the then-intern's relationship with President Bill Clinton in the White House, has died, according to her mother, Inge Carotenuto, and her former attorney, Joseph Murtha.

Tripp had previously been treated for breast cancer. She was 70.

Tripp, a friend of Lewinsky's at the time, turned the 20 hours of tapes over to special prosecutor Kenneth Starr. The scandal ultimately led to Clinton's impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice, though he was ultimately acquitted in the Senate.

Lewinsky, despite their prior experiences, expressed well wishes to Tripp as reports indicated Wednesday that her health was failing.

"(No) matter the past, upon hearing that linda tripp is very seriously ill, i hope for her recovery. i can't imagine how difficult this is for her family," Lewinsky tweeted.

Lewinsky began to tell Tripp, a coworker of hers at the Pentagon, of her relationship with Clinton in the summer of 1996. Tripp began taping their conversations in the fall of 1997.

After contacting Starr about the tapes in January 1998, she met with Lewinsky again while wearing a wire, at which point Lewinsky coached Tripp on what to tell lawyers about Kathleen Willey, another former White House staffer who had testified about alleged unsolicited sexual advances made by Clinton in 1993.

When asked on Larry King Live in 2003 whether she regretted it, Tripp replied, "No, I would do it again."

"I told (Lewinsky) I would not fix a court case. I would not help fix a court case," Tripp said. "Yet I knew the President of the United States and Monica were intending to do that."

Speaking on the podcast "Slow Burn" in 2018, Tripp defended her actions as motivated by the idea that it would ultimately help Lewinsky.

"This was flying by the seat of my pants, terrified, out of my wits, completely guilt-ridden that I was having to manipulate her, but convinced in my soul that in the end it would benefit her. That he would no longer be able to do this to hurt anyone else," she recounted.

Tripp told the podcast that, at the time, she was being disingenuous while taping Lewinsky but only because she felt that she had to be.

"There wasn't a thing about those three months that were authentic. Everything prior to that was, but I needed everything to be recreated and it was beyond manipulative," she said. "Did I want to do that? Not necessarily, but I felt like I had no choice."

Tripp was open that she sought to go after Clinton, saying that Lewinsky's story established "a pattern of behavior that otherwise I believe wouldn't have had credibility" and that she "was eager for this information to fall into the hands of the Paula Jones attorneys," who sued the President on sexual harassment charges.

"But to say it was distasteful, to this day I have enormous guilt about" disseminating information to the press and FBI, she said.

"And of all the people I care about understanding, she's the one I wish I could convince," Tripp added, referring to Lewinsky. "And that'll never happen, so."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, February 9, 2020

John Lauck Of Children's Miracle Network Is Exiled From Human Existence

In the darkest of night, the winter moon shone, delivering the sign that the heavens shall soon fall.

Another trafficker of tiny humans is exiled from human existence, and many more shall follow, right Mittens?

Praise the lord.

Marie Osmond, Clinton Foundation, MSU & Faith Based Funding For Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Of The Children's Miracle Network

#maytheheavensfall

CEO of Children's Miracle Network Hospitals dies after tragic bike accident

John Lauck, President and CEO of Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals 
John Lauck, President and CEO of Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals, has died due to complications from a tragic bike accident, according to CMN Hospitals.

“John’s passing is a tremendous loss for our organization,” said Nana Mensah, Chair of Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals’ Board of Trustees. “John will be missed by so many. We will be supporting his family and the Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals community during this heartbreaking time.”

John’s family shared the following statement: “As John's family — his wife Alison, his sons Ryan (Leia), Alan (Jhoi), Eric (Kate), and Ethan, along with John's parents John and Evelyn Lauck, siblings, and other family members — we would like to express our sincere appreciation for the outpouring of love and support our family has received since John's tragic accident. John's life impacted so many of us in remarkable ways, and we are grateful for the expressions of kindness and concern as we have navigated this unspeakably difficult journey.”

Hurley Children's Hospital in Flint is a CMN hospital.

The Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals Board of Trustees’ governance committee is discussing interim leadership for the organization.

Lauck's family is asking people to consider donating to CMN Hospitals in John's name in lieu of flowers.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, January 22, 2020

IMPEACHMENT: Senate Trial - Day Two

This happened...



This happened...

The origins of the Detroit Land Bank Authority.


Then, this happened...
Then, this happened...

Ken Starr faces renewed scrutiny over Baylor sexual assault scandal 

Then, this happened...

Supreme Court turns away case that could have helped Dems get unredacted Mueller report


A court ruling in an obscure case that threw a roadblock before House Democrats' efforts to obtain secret grand jury information from Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation will remain in place, as the Supreme Cot announced Tuesday it will not hear the case.

The case, McKeever v. Barr, has nothing at all to do with Mueller, Russia or President Trump, but rather it involves one man's quest for records related to the 1956 disappearance of Columbia University professor Jesus de Galindez and the secrecy surrounding grand jury testimony.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a court cannot order the release of grand jury information -- which is typically kept secret -- except in specific situations outlined in Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Other circuits have ruled differently, stating that courts have an inherent authority to release secret grand jury material.

Justice Stephen Breyer said in a statement Tuesday that an advisory committee for these rules is best-positioned to bring clarity to the issue -- not the court. The committee has in the past appeared to side with those other circuits, he noted.

"Whether district courts retain authority to release grand jury material outside those situations specifically enumerated in the Rules, or in situations like this, is an important question," he wrote. "It is one I think the Rules Committee both can and should revisit."

The ruling means that McKeever will not be able to access the grand jury information related to the Galindez case, which he was after as part of his effort to publish his book, “The Galindez Case,” which was released way back in 2013.

“My book is done. But I wasn’t going to let this part of my efforts go, without finishing the pursuit of my journey,” McKeever said in a 2018 phone interview with Fox News. McKeever says the FBI has tried all along to keep a lid on the details. For decades, he has reviewed records related to the case.

He recalled one “striking moment” from his search in the early '80s: “When I went to the court archives to examine trial records, the clerk asked, ‘why do you want to see these records?’ I said, ‘why are you asking me that?’ The answer was ‘to let the CIA know you want to see these records.’”

“That said to me, keep on going,” McKeever said. Now, however, he appears to be out of options.

The case popped on the radar of those following the Russia probe because of House Democrats' efforts to see the grand jury testimony from Mueller's investigation.

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee have claimed that the court should release the information because their impeachment inquiry fell under the category of "judicial proceedings." A district court ruling agreed and said the secret material should be released, but the Justice Department is currently challenging the case before the D.C. Circuit.

The DOJ is arguing that the House's impeachment inquiry does not qualify as a judicial proceeding. They also claim that because the House's impeachment inquiry already yielded two articles of impeachment that had nothing to do with Mueller's report, they should not be able to access the grand jury information.

The House Democrats claimed that their investigation remains ongoing and that additional articles of impeachment remain a possibility.

The Supreme Court's decision not to take up McKeever's case does not by itself negatively impact the Democrats' efforts, but if the court had agreed to hear the case and then ruled in McKeever's favor, it would have made their claim for the grand jury material stronger by eliminating the controversy over whether the impeachment inquiry qualifies as a judicial proceeding.

A three-judge panel that included a Trump appointee heard oral arguments in the House Judiciary Committee's case on Jan. 3. The panel appeared divided and did not immediately issue a ruling.

FUN FACT! DETROIT GRAND JURIES ARE STILL UNDER SEAL UNTIL THEY VOTE.

Then, this happened...

Exclusive: Giuliani told U.S. his client deserves leniency for financing Venezuela's opposition - Parnas


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Ken Starr Predicts Impeachment Witnesses Through His Whitewater Powers Of Refusing To #sayhisname

What if Ken Starr is to be a witness in the Senate impeachment trial?

What if Ken Starr becomes indicted by a grand jury?

What if we just sit back, with cocktails & popcorn in in hand and enjoy the falling of the heavens.


#sayhisname

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, September 26, 2019

Look Who Has Slithered From The Sunken Depths Of Whitewater - Robert Ray

Everyone is an expert on impeachment, yet no one will #sayhisname.

Meet Robert Ray.


Robert William Ray (born April 4, 1960) is an American lawyer practicing in the New York office of the Dallas-based law firm of Thompson & Knight, LLP.[1] As the successor to Ken Starr as the head of the Office of the Independent Counsel (1999 to 2002) he investigated and issued the final reports on the Whitewater scandal, the White House travel office controversy, and the White House FBI files controversy. Before that he was Deputy Independent Counsel investigating former Secretary of Agriculture Mike Espy and before that Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York.[2]
Ray submitted the independent counsel's final reports on
Monica Lewinsky scandal (2002-03-06)
Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Association (2001-01-05)
Anthony Marceca (2000-03-16)
Bernard Nussbaum (2000-03-16)
William David Watkins (2000-06-22)
Hillary Clinton (2000-06-22)
Under independent counsel Donald Smaltz he prosecuted Mike Espy, and then worked under Ken Starr.

He was an unsuccessful candidate for a non-partisan school board in Brooklyn, New York 1993 and 1996, on the "children's slate". He was briefly a candidate in the United States Senate elections, 2002 in New Jersey.[2][3][4]

He is the father of three children.

As of 2016 he is in private practice, a partner at Thompson & Knight LLP.[5]

Ray received his A.B. from Princeton University in 1982, and his J.D. cum laude from the Washington and Lee University School of Law in 1985. He was a clerk for Honorable Frank X. Altimari in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, August 9, 2019

The Tale Of Judiciary Jolly Jerry's Quest For Brett Kavanaugh Working Papers

Gather round, my dearies, for the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed shall tell the tale of Judiciary Jolly Jerry and his quest for Brett Kavanaugh's Working Papers.

Once upon a time, there were these FOX operatives, for it is impossible for me to recognize them as journalists, who peddle their wares by distracting the public with flesh, devoid of sources or intellect, which could have easily have been found with a basic internet search for the Wikipedia entry.



Brett did not just work with Ken Starr, he also was the one who worked on numerous investigations
The Ken Starr Special Counsel Team, featuring Brett Kavanaugh
of Bill Clinton's presidency, and allegedly wrote the Ken Starr Report, which unlocked the constitutional mechanisms for House Judiciary to commence impeachment proceedings.

Now, with this Wikipedia information in hand, executed through a basic Google search of the term "Brett Kavanaugh", this brings us to Monica Lewinsky.

It seems Brett worked with the former Chief of Staff for House Judiciary, Julian *Slimy Slime Slime* Epstein, of which I never queried on how he got the job, but I will just go out there on a limb and say Hillary Clinton more than likely had something to do with Julian getting hired because she worked on the Nixon impeachment proceedings.


She just refuses to #sayhisname


Julian *Slimy Slime Slime* Epstein, known for his "fabulous" New York parties, set up the impeachment hearings by making it into a sex scandal with Monica Lewinsky, then denied her due process of legal representation or the right to testify and tell her story, which was Whitewater.

Whitewater was the progenitor of the Detroit Land Bank Authority and was set up by Perkins Coie, which sucks.


So, now it seems Jolly Jerry Nadler is going after Brett's work product to find out how they switched out Special Counsel Bob Fiske, who supposedly was investigating the original model for stealin', which was transposed and enhanced for Detroit, recognized as the Arkansas Finance Development Authority, and replace it with #MeToo to impeach Trump.

But Doug Collins, the Ranking Member, does not like that idea of digging for a way to launch impeachment proceedings and really does not want to deal with the fact that he will not #sayhisname, nor does he want to be indicted for what happened in House Judiciary, the congressional votes, the GOP, and the children.

Doug has fear in his eyes, but only I can see it, well, maybe not just me....

I know Justin Amish knows why Doug has fear.

I know Bob MAXIMUS GOODLATTECUS Goodlatte knows the origin of this fear.

Jason Chaffetz also knows what this fear is.

Brett used to work on George Bush's campaign with John Roberts in the Florida ballot "chad" issue.

Brett also worked as a staff secretary during 911, so Brett knows stuff because he was recruiting federal judges for appointments.

Senate Judiciary knows all about this, but intentionally neglected to address this in Brett's SCOTUS confirmation hearings, and instead, pulled the old switch-o-change-o model and give the public another sex scandal, to distract the masses in another Pied Piper campaign, just like they are trying to do with the impeachment proceedings.

See, the impeachment proceedings are really not about Trump.

The impeachment proceedings are being constructed as a cover up for not having to #sayhisname, but they have no choice but to #sayhisname because I am going to make them say it.

This is sanguinely entertaining because I know Slimy Slime Slime is advising Jolly Jerry.

This is about Medicaid fraud in child welfare and we are in a Constitutional Crisis.


#sayhisname

Jerry Nadler makes new push for Kavanaugh’s White House records


House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler is moving to bring new scrutiny to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s past, asking the National Archives on Tuesday to release a large cache of records related to his time in George W. Bush's White House.

In a letter from Nadler and Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), another senior Judiciary Committee member, the lawmakers said accessing the records are essential to "the public's faith in the integrity of the judiciary."

The effort reopens a debate over Kavanaugh's nomination, which became the subject of fierce partisan rancor during his confirmation hearings last year after Kavanaugh faced allegations of sexual assault.

Democrats also argued they lacked access to records pertaining to Kavanaugh's government work that were important to his qualifications. Ultimately, the Senate supported his nomination along nearly partisan lines, but Democrats vowed to continue seeking records about his background.

Nadler and Johnson emphasized that the Senate only received a sliver of Kavanaugh's records from his White House tenure, which ran from 2001 to 2006, when he served in the White House counsel's office and later as staff secretary.

Then-Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley requested records from Kavanaugh's time in the counsel's office but later withdrew his request after the committee received some of the documents it sought.

But Nadler and Johnson say the likelihood that Kavanaugh will rule on matters like abortion rights, executive authority and other topics within the purview of the Judiciary Committee increases the urgency for them to obtain the full slate of records from his White House tenure — information they say is on track to be released in 2021 anyway under the Presidential Records Act.

In the interim, the committee members say the National Archives and Records Administration should begin producing documents that Grassley initially requested and then, on a "rolling basis," Kavanaugh's emails and any "textual records" in his office files from his time as staff secretary.

The top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee ripped Nadler's push as "harassment" of Kavanaugh.

“Chairman Nadler’s request is so far outside the scope of judicial ethics, it’s harassment,” said Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.). “Senate Democrats spent months launching false accusations in an attempt to smear Justice Kavanaugh’s reputation and block his confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court, and now House Democrats want to follow suit with yet another fishing expedition to tarnish his good name.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, July 9, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: July 9th, 2019. Jeff Epstein’s Columbus Connections - Columbus Command Center

I want to know if Epstein is the one who came up with the Corporate Shape Shifter Model.


Mystery Around Jeffrey Epstein's Fortune and How He Made It

They eat each other alive.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

MCDUFF & WEB: Introduction Into Multiple Attestation To Blockchain Evidence In The Annals Of History - Civil Rights 2.0

The original intent of law was the right to civility in public testimony.

They used to have public squares, but somewhere through history, chattel law jumped in and transmographied the entire concept of justice through propaganda.

Now, we have the cyberverse, which means, we can publish our testimony, under our legal names, to bear witness to the right to bear arms.

Quintessentially, your words can be entered into the court record with a click of a button into an evidentary chain of command, a path analysis that can easily be examined if there exists any elements of a false claim.

I do not like snake oil salesmen because they are the ones who cloak the industry of trafficking tiny humans with child welfare propaganda.

If you want to talk smack online, for money, particularly foreign money, that is probably funded through some child welfare fraud scheme, about anything mean about my Sweetie, well, expect to be called to bear witness in a court of law where you can live in a glorious array of compound internet searches, or as a keyword search term on my blogs, which are already entered into the court record, apostillized in the U.S. Department of Justice.

See how that works?

This is how you preserve the annals of history.

No more bleachbitting history.

No more secrets.


"Do not be mean to my Sweetie. Period."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, April 20, 2019

Before The Detroit Land Bank Authority, There Was The Whitewater Development Corporation


I just thought the timing to be proper to share this lovely clip of history, considering we are now running into that Special Counsel messy with Mueller, but hey, what do I know?

I know that Special Counsel messy has been previously addressed after reviewing that hot mess with Fiske and Starr.

I wonder what Monica Lewinsky is up to.





Carolyn Huber

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, January 24, 2019

Marie Osmond, Clinton Foundation, MSU & Faith Based Funding For Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Of The Children's Miracle Network

It seems Jeffery Epstein was the brainchild behind the creation of the Clinton Foundation out of Michigan State University.

The Sparrow Clinton Hospital Foundation operates out of MSU with ASSETS of $129,806,280.

Edward Sparrow Hospital Association  had reported in 2016 $966,512,648 and ASSETS of $1,361,393,716.

Sparrow Health System generated revenue of $107,496,545 in 2016.

Michigan State University - Sparrow Hospital Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (RNICU) does lots of research on really tiny humans.

Sparrow Health Systems handles the Flint Water Crisis which is why I continue to say it was intentional.

Sparrow Health Systems is part of the Michigan Life Sciences Corridor, built as a Public Private Partnership so they can keep all the intellectual proprietorship of all pharmaceutical, biomedical and genetic research discoveries using the tiny humans they used as lab rats, while billing Medicaid.

Sparrow Health Systems is part of the Children's Miracle Network and more than likely uses the MSU Federal Credit Union as its financial arm.


The Children's Miracle Network is also working with another Baylor University through the Texas Children's Hospital.

Ken Starr, former Special Prosecutor of the Whitewater Impeachment used to be over the children's lab rat research programming at Baylor until he was asked to leave.

It seems the Children's Miracle Network is part of the Bush Family's charities of OneStar, but the Michigan Attorney General Charity Section finally shut it down.

I guess Bill Schuette found prudence in heeding my words.

Anyway, for more background into Faith Based Funding that allows the Children's Miracle Network to maximize revenue (because non-profits call it revenue, according to 501c3 IRS codes), you can find it here.

And now you know a bit more on how privatization established these children's research operations like the Clinton Foundation, which never incorporated, just like the Detroit Land Bank Authority never incorporated, using children of "The Poors" as lab rats.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, January 21, 2019

Whitewater: Just My #MeToo Notes - 2-5-1998

What Do Whitewater, Ken Starr, Monica Lewinsky & Detroit Have In Common?

Learn more: BEVERLY TRAN: What Do Whitewater, Ken Starr, Monica Lewinsky & Detroit Have In Common? http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2018/02/what-do-whitewater-ken-starr-monica.html#ixzz5dGXS63mE
Stop Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare 

 

Sources: Lewinsky Won't Say Clinton Told Her To Lie

Clinton denies 'legal charges' as Podesta testifies before grand jury

starr
WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, Feb. 5) -- Former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, even if granted immunity, is not prepared to testify that either President Bill Clinton or his friend Vernon Jordan ever told her flatly to lie under oath about her alleged affair with the president, CNN has learned.
Sources say Lewinsky is prepared to say the president and Jordan urged her to be "evasive," which legal experts say may not meet the test for encouraging perjury and obstructing justice.
Also in this story:


The sources say Lewinsky's offer is not good enough for Starr, because, on secretly-recorded conversations with onetime friend Linda Tripp, Lewinsky is heard alleging Clinton and Jordan told her to lie.

This was described as the main reason Starr backed away Wednesday from an immunity agreement reached with Lewinsky's lawyer Monday night.

These same sources, close to the investigation, say Lewinsky is prepared to say she had oral sex with Clinton, though not intercourse.

Clinton has vehemently denied having sexual relations with Lewinsky, or telling anyone to lie.

During an Oval Office appearance Thursday with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Clinton three times refused to say what kind of relationship he had with Lewinsky.

"I have already denied the legal charges, strongly, and I do so again," Clinton said. "But there is an ongoing investigation. Under those circumstances, the right thing for me to do is to go back and do the job the American people hired me to do, and that's what I am doing."


Sources say Starr's staff is now asking that Lewinsky submit to a formal interview before any immunity is granted, though he will not discuss particulars.

Starr says inquiry is 'moving very quickly'

lewinsky
In Little Rock, Ark., Starr brushed aside questions Thursday about the status of immunity talks with Lewinsky, but said his investigation into the sex-and-perjury allegations involving Clinton is making progress.

Starr, in Arkansas for a pre-trial hearing in former Gov. Jim Guy Tucker's second trial, said the investigation into the Lewinsky matter is "moving very quickly and we've made very significant progress."

"We are going by the book," Starr said when asked about the immunity discussions with Lewinsky. "We want the truth. We want all the truth. We want it completely, accurately and we will satisfy ourselves that we're getting the truth."

Starr's office is looking into allegations that Clinton had a sexual relationship with Lewinsky, and then urged her to lie about it under oath.

Starr noted that Attorney General Janet Reno gave his office jurisdiction over "very serious allegations" involving the president.

"Those allegations are possible obstruction of justice, intimidation of witnesses and subornation of perjury," Starr said. "That is an extraordinary set of circumstances. We're investigating those as promptly, as quickly as we can."

Starr also declined to comment on a report in Thursday's Washington Post that he has given Lewinsky's lawyers until the end of the week to make the former intern available for questioning, or let her face possible prosecution.

Clinton calls executive privilege 'a hypothetical question'

clinton
In his photo ops with Blair, Clinton was asked about whether his aides might assert executive privilege to limit their grand jury testimony, called that "a hypothetical question."

"First let me make it clear that for four years we have been cooperating -- exhaustively," Clinton said. "And that's a hypothetical question as far as I know. Should it arise, I will await a recommendation from the White House counsel about the institutional responsibilities of the presidency, and then when I get it I will make a decision."

Executive privilege is a president's right to withhold specific information, usually deliberations with top aides, from Congress or the courts.
In Little Rock, Starr said the purpose for invoking executive privilege would be to prevent the grand jury from "getting specific information," and he would have to assess his options if the White House goes that route.

Ginsburg not surprised at immunity rejection

ginsburg
Meanwhile, Lewinsky's attorney, William Ginsburg, says he was not surprised that Starr rejected a written statement seeking her immunity from prosecution.

Ginsburg told CNN late Wednesday that he had not spoken to Starr and does not anticipate talking to him anytime soon. "Frankly, I don't want to really deal with him anymore," Ginsburg said.

Ginsburg said he was busy preparing a defense for Lewinsky and he was "hell-bent on telling the truth."

Ginsburg said he was not going to be "intimidated by a man with a mission," saying he had a young woman to defend. He is convinced he will have to defend his client, saying, "That is what I am going to do ... no more games."

"If Judge Starr's object of this whole investigation is to net Monica Lewinsky in a conviction and jail time, then we have to look at how our tax dollars are being spent," Ginsburg told reporters.

When asked about the future, Ginsburg said, "The presidency will be preserved, the American public will have restored confidence in the system, the Congress will have reviewed the office of the Independent Counsel in terms of the legislation that enabled it, and once again we will have some restoration of confidence in government.

"In terms of my client, my client hopefully will be old news, and she will have a job somewhere and building a career," Ginsburg added. "I will be back to the normal practice of country law and no longer in the Beltway. With any luck at all, my next tour will be of New York, not of Washington."
Ginsburg said he expects to return to Washington sometime next week, probably Tuesday or Wednesday.

Word broke Wednesday that Starr had rejected the written statement by Lewinsky's lawyers.

More details emerge about negotiations

Sources familiar with the investigation told CNN that lawyers for Starr and Lewinsky had actually signed an immunity agreement Monday evening, an agreement that Starr has now backed away from.
podesta
The sources say Starr's lawyers want to re-open talks, even though Lewinsky and her attorneys, Ginsburg and Nathaniel Speights, signed the agreement on Starr's Office of Independent Counsel stationery.

A well-placed source familiar with the investigation says that Lewinsky's attorneys gave Starr's office a written proffer, or statement, outlining what she would be prepared to say if granted immunity.

But prosecutors apparently concluded that Lewinsky's statement of what she knew was not clear enough. The Washington Post reported today that its source said Lewinsky acknowledged having a sexual relationship with Clinton in the statement, but gave a muddled account of whether she was urged to lie about the relationship when she spoke to lawyers in the Paula Jones case.

Jones, a former Arkansas state employee, has filed a lawsuit against Clinton, alleging that he asked her for oral sex while he was governor, and that after she rebuffed him, she suffered a hostile work environment. That case is due to go to trial in May.

Podesta testifies before grand jury

coleman
Meanwhile, the Whitewater grand jury continued to hear testimony in the case. White House Deputy Chief of Staff John Podesta testified and is expected to return to answer more questions Friday.

"I did answer all of the questions put to me today," Podesta told waiting reporters afterward. "Nothing in my testimony in any way contradicted the strong denials that the president has made to these allegations, and since I have been asked to return and answer some additional questions, I think that it's best that I not answer any questions out here and reserve that to the grand jury."

Earlier in the day, the grand jury heard from another former White House intern.

Justin Coleman, a 21-year-old former intern at the White House, testified and then told reporters he had no knowledge of a relationship -- "proper or improper" -- between Lewinsky and Clinton.
"I at no time had knowledge of any relationship -- proper or improper -- between the president and Miss Lewinsky," Coleman said. "I support President Clinton and am grateful for the opportunity to have served him and his administration. I leave now to return to Brown University."

Coleman, from Chapel Hill, N.C., said he worked in the White House from August 1997 through January 1998.

A case of mistaken identity?

In West Palm Beach, Fla., Starr has subpoenaed videotapes of Clinton's trip to south Florida last year.
A White House source told CNN that Lewinsky was not on the March 1997 visit to golfer Greg Norman's house.

The subpoena, delivered to WPEC-TV Thursday afternoon, asked the West Palm Beach station to "produce the video tape or video tapes depicting President William Jefferson Clinton with Miss Monica Lewinsky on a trip President Clinton made to Florida during which he visited Greg Norman."
It was on that trip that Clinton tore a tendon in his right knee when he lost his footing on a step at Norman's home.

The management at WPEC told CNN that it has scanned most of the tapes of its coverage of Clinton's visit to south Florida and has found no pictures of Lewinsky.

A White House source said Starr may have confused Lewinsky with a female National Security Council (NSC) staffer who was assigned to the trip.

The source said a West Palm Beach newspaper reporter has shown the White House a videotape from the Clinton visit which pictures the president and the NSC employee exiting a limousine.

A WPEC reporter told CNN that over a week ago editors did find a segment of video showing the president and a dark-haired woman in a limousine, but, when they checked her identity, it was determined she was an NSC employee.

WPEC management said it had not decided as of Thursday afternoon if it would hand over the tapes or challenge the subpoena in court. The subpoena gives the station until Feb. 10 to respond.
CNN's Wolf Blitzer contributed to this report.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, November 23, 2018

Monica Lewinsky To Get Due Process, Ken Starr To Get Karma

Karma, Ken.

I already know that you and your associates are "Legal Genius" (tradmark pending).



Monica Lewinsky reveals for the first time that Bill Clinton urged her to LIE under oath and then called her in for one last tryst before ditching her - which led her to consider suicide

  • Monica Lewinsky revealed that Bill Clinton phoned her at 2.30am to inform her that she was on the witness list for the Paula Jones case 
  • 'Thankfully, Bill helped me lock myself back from that and he said I could probably sign an affidavit to get out of it,' said Lewinsky 
  • She signed the affidavit and soon after got called to the White House for a Christmas tryst
  • Clinton then bailed on Lewinsky, who found herself targeted by the FBI and Kenneth Starr's team 
Monica Lewisnky recounted the moment that the sitting president encouraged her to lie under oath on the final episode of the A&E docuseries The Clinton Affair.

It marked the first time that Lewinsky has actually stated that Bill Clinton advised her to deny their affair if called to testify in the Paula Jones case, pointing out that she could avoid being deposed if she simply denied the charge in an affidavit.

Then, in a shockingly bold move, Clinton called for Lewinsky a few days later and the pair enjoyed an intimate, and private, Christmas party in the White House.

Unbeknownst to Lewinsky that was the end of the pair's relationship, with Clinton quickly bailing on his 24-year-old paramour who was left to do battle with the special prosecutor, the FBI and the American public on her own while he fell back on a multi-million dollar legal fund raised by supporters.

It became too much for Lewinsky at one point she said, and she seriously considered taking her own life.

Wake-up call: Monica Lewinsky revealed that Bill Clinton phoned her at 2.30am to inform her that she was on the witness list for the Paula Jones case.

'Bill called at 2.30 in the morning and there were two pieces of bad news which he was passing along,' recalled Lewinsky.

'One was that Betty Currie's brother had been killed in a car accident and I had grown very close to Betty, I mean, our relationship was complicated, but I cared very much for her she had had another relative who had passed away recently so this was distressing news to me.'

Things then got worse for Lewinsky with the second bit of news, which hit much closer to home.
'And then, he really dropped the bombshell that he had seen the witness list for the Paula Jones case and I was on it,' revealed Lewinsky.

'The information about Betty spun me one way and the information about the witness list spun me completely the other way. He told me that it broke his heart and that he'd thought that I probably wouldn't get called as a witness.'


She continued: 'I was petrified. I was frantic about my family, and this becoming public. Thankfully, Bill helped me lock myself back from that and he said I could probably sign an affidavit to get out of it, and he didn't even know if a 100 percent I would be subpoenaed.'

Tears: 'Thankfully, Bill helped me lock myself back from that and he said I could probably sign an affidavit to get out of it,' said Lewinsky(above in The Clinton Affair)

Lewinsky then pointed out that Clinton never said: 'Now, listen you're gonna have to lie here.'
She followed that up though by stating he also never said: 'Listen, honey, this is gonna be really awful we're gonna have to tell the truth.'

Lewinsky was subpoenaed just a few days later, so she decided to speak with Clinton's close friend and attorney Vernon Jordan.

Up until this point, the docuseries had been remarkably detailed in the chain of events leading up to the impeachment, but here there are some obvious questions that are not even asked, let alone answered.

Lewinsky claims that she called up Jordan on her own and managed to secure a meeting with him in his office.

And from there she claims he introduced her to her attorney.

Apologize: She signed the affidavit and soon after got called to the White House for a Christmas tryst (Clinton above in 1998 denying the affair)

There is no examination of how a 24-year-old working at the Pentagon managed to quickly book a face-to-face with one of the most powerful litigators in the world at the time.

'I didn't know whom to contact and Vernon mentioned a lawyer Frank Carter, and took me to meet him,' said Lewinsky.

'Frank Carter explained to me, if I'd signed an affidavit denying having had an intimate relationship with the president it might mean I wouldn't have to be deposed in the Paula Jones case.

'I did feel uncomfortable about it but I felt it was the right thing to do, ironically, right? So, the right thing to do, to break the law.'

Soon after she did this she was rewarded with a call to meet Clinton at the White House.

'This is the first time I met Buddy, the dog and we kind of all played around with Buddy in the office and then we went into the back study and we had a Christmas kiss,' said Lewinsky.

'Over the summer he had gone to Martha's Vineyard and he brought back a bunch of different things. He had this big canvas bag from the Black Dog. This marble bear, sunglasses.

'It was the most presents he'd given me at one time. He knew the subpoena was gonna ask to produce certain items and yet he was giving me more gifts. He clearly still trusted me.'

She handed those gifts, and all others, to Clinton's secretary for safekeeping and to avoid possible seizure.
Then she was left to fend for herself, a situation that quickly became dire. 
This comes after the premiere of the series on Sunday, when Lewinsky's parents spoke about their daughter's affair for the first time.

Dr Bernard Lewinsky and his ex-wife Marcia said on the second episode of the The Clinton Affair that they were thrilled when their daughter got an internship at the White House.

'I'm an immigrant from El Salvador and it was awesome and unbelievable that she would be working at the White House,' said her father, the son of German Jews who fled to Central America during World War II.

That internship soon spiraled out of control when Lewinsky was discovered to be having an affair with the president, and the FBI forced her to help in the investigation into Clinton.

Lewinsky reveals they did this by threatening to prosecute her mother, breaking down in tears as she recalls how Kenneth Starr's team and federal agents said both women were facing 27 years in prison for lying about the affair.

I kept asking could I call my mom, they kept saying no,' recalled Lewinsky of the 12-hour interrogation inside a hotel room at the Ritz-Carlton.

'You're 24, you don't need to call your mommy, you need to make a decision about what to do.'
Lewinsky was unflappable at that point however, and told the men: 'Well you should learn I am leaning towards not cooperating.'

That is when the men made the decision to threaten not only her, but also her family.

'And then he said, "Well, you should know, we're also thinking about prosecuting your mom for the things you said she did on the tape,"' said Lewinsky, breaking down in tears.

Lewinsky then informed the men that she had to call someone, either her mother or a lawyer, before she would make this decision to wear a wire and have her calls tapped by the FBI.

Tight unit: Lewinsky broke down in tears when recalling the moment that she was told both she and her mother were looking at 27 years in prison for lying (Monoica and Marcia above circa 1996) Monica Lewinsky says Bill sang her 'Try A Little Tenderness'

The men eventually gave in to Lewinsky's demands, and she said she went to a pay phone and called her mother in the local mall.

Lewinsky said her mother attempted to get her to calm down and breathe, before finally coming to realize the situation her daughter was in at the time.

'FBI ... have me ... I'm in a hotel,' recalled Lewinsky of her words to her mother.

Monica's mother recalled her daughter's earlier days in the second episode, while sharing some photos of the girl's childhood.

'Monica was a beautiful and very, very smart little girl,' said her mother Marcia.

'But stubborn. Really stubborn.

Dr Lewinsky added: 'She was very gregarious, friendly, you know when she was in the room.' 
And he said of the moment he learned about her internship: 'I was so proud of her and she was so happy about it.'

Lewinsky also detailed the events that led to her decision to confide in Linda Tripp, the woman who would eventually alert the special prosecutor to the fact that Clinton was having an affair with a former intern.

It all started when members of Clinton's staff decided to move Lewinsky out of her post working for Legislative Affairs at The White House and transfer her to the Pentagon amid growing concerns over how close she had become with the president.

Lewinsky suggested that this was all done with the knowledge of her paramour, who she describes as 'crestfallen.'

The two had been seeing one another daily and enjoying weekly trysts prior to that Lewinsky had revealed, but the move to a new job and building changed all that in an instant.

Lewinsky would instead be forced to wait until the middle of the night for Clinton to call, but she said that he had promised to move her back to a White House position after the election.

At that point the pair had been carrying on their affair for five months, and a number of staff members had begun to take notice of how often Lewinsky was around the president and Oval Office.

It was an optics problem however said staffers, with no one explicitly stating that they believed the intern was having an affair with the president.

The job shift also came while Clinton was in the middle of his reelection campaign, meaning that he was not in touch with Lewinsky for days or even weeks at a time.

'I had this nagging insecurity that maybe he just did all these things these last six months cause he wanted to keep me quiet during the election,' explained Lewinsky.

'How stupid am I that I believed this, that I bought this. I felt so deflated and so desperate. And those were the conditions along with some other things that led to me confiding in Linda Tripp.'

Lewinsky described her mindset at the time by saying she 'had naively invested in his promise,' but that was shattered when the election came and went without the offer of a White House job.

It was too much for Lewinsky, who says that after a few hours she began to think about commiting suicide.

Twenty years later, it still causes her to break down in tears.

'The ground completely crumbled in that moment. I felt so much guilt. And I felt terrified,' she revealed in the interview.

An FBI agent involved in the case acknowledged this, saying that Lewinsky was 'alternating between being hysterical, being angry, being abusive.'

'They imagined that I would have flipped really easily. They had no plan in place for what would happen if i said no,' said Lewinsky.

That then gave way to thoughts of ending her own life.

'There was a point for me somewhere within these first several hours where I would be hysterically crying and then I would just shut down,' she recalled.

'And in the shut down period I just remember looking out the window and thinking the only way to fix this is to kill myself.'

Lewinsky, who up until that point had managed to hold back her tears, then burst out sobbing.
'I just felt terrible ... and I was scared ... and I was mortified,' she said while trying to regain her composure.

This all played out at the Ritz Carlton in January 1998, with the Office of the Independent Counsel getting Linda Tripp to set up a meeting with Lewinsky.

She was then taken to a room and held by prosecutors until that night.

Lewinsky admitted that the thing that made this so difficult for her was the fact that she was still in love with Clinton and she stood her ground, until they threatened her mother. 

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, November 21, 2018

Kavanaugh Is Referred To SCOTUS For Ethics Investigation - Is Ken Starr In Those Filings?

Image result for ken starr whitewater
Ken Starr, Baylor University.
It is such a shame we do not know the scope of the judicial ethics complaints.

I bet there is more than just quarter bounce in those filings.

But, hey, what do I know.

I know the following is what was going on when he was at Baylor University, because it is all public information, and I learned circumvention research from Starletta Banks.

Oh, and it is the same crap that is going on with with the charge of Michigan State University ex-President Lou Anna Simon.

Child welfare fraud.

Same exact crap, except I have not found the children's trust funds out of Baylor, yet, but all I have to do if follow the Medicaid fraud in child welfare because they are using kids as lab rats

You are more than welcome to contribute or just follow my mission right here, because we are all going to be coming to Detroit.

Baylor paid ex-coach Art Briles $15.1 million after dismissal amid school's sexual assault scandal; Ken Starr got $4.5 million


Actually, it was more than $4.5 because he got paid for being the Chancellor, too, you know.

Image result for ken starr contempt
Timing is everything

Baylor University and Ken Starr Issue Joint Statement Regarding Their Employment Relationship


WACO, Texas (Aug. 19, 2016) – Effective today, Judge Ken Starr will be leaving his faculty status and tenure at Baylor University’s Law School. The mutually agreed separation comes with the greatest respect and love Judge Starr has for Baylor and with Baylor’s recognition and appreciation for Judge Starr’s many contributions to Baylor. Baylor wishes Judge Ken Starr well in his future endeavors. Judge Starr expresses his thanks to the Baylor family for the opportunity to serve as president and chancellor and is grateful for his time with the exceptional students of Baylor University who will lead and serve around the world.

Largest-ever U.S. autism research study underway

I wonder what Ken Starr is doing right about now....




Again, what do I know?

Chief Justice Roberts Requests Tenth Circuit To Investigate Kavanaugh Ethics Questions

Image result for ken starr whitewater
Brett Kavanaugh & Ken Starr
Whitewater days
(pre-Detroit Land Bank Authority days)
These complaints were initially received by the U.S. Court of Appeals prior to Kavanaugh’s seating on the Supreme Court. Chief Judge Merrick Garland — whose nomination to the Supreme Court was blocked by Senate Republicans—recused himself from the matter. The complaints were then passed to Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson, whom President George H.W. Bush nominated to the bench.

Judge Henderson dismissed some of the complaints made against Judge Kavanaugh as frivolous. But she concluded that more than a dozen complaints were substantive enough to warrant investigation by an impartial panel and that they should not be handled by Judge Kavanaugh’s fellow judges in the D.C. Circuit. She referred them to Chief Justice Roberts, who has now referred them to the 10th Circuit.

The Legal Basis Of The Ethics Complaints
The complaints were not made without legal basis. More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.”

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens also stated that Judge Kavanaugh has demonstrated bias and is “not fit for the Supreme Court.” Former Justice Stevens, in remarks to retirees in Boca Raton, Fla, declared that Kavanaugh’s statements on September 27 revealed prejudices that would make it impossible for him to do the court’s work. “They suggest that he has demonstrated a potential bias involving enough potential litigants before the court that he would not be able to perform his full responsibilities.”

Wall Street Journal, about “a few things [he] should not have said” in his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, though without giving specifics.

Now, Chief Justice Roberts has requested Judge Timothy M. Tymkovich, the chief circuit judge of the Denver-based Tenth Circuit, to review the complaints against Kavanaugh and "any pending or new complaints related to the same subject matter." Judge Tymkovich has the option of handling the complaints himself, dismissing them or appointing a special committee to examine them.

Unlike the allegations of Justice Kavanaugh’s sexual misconduct and excessive drinking as a teenager, there is no question here about the facts as to what happened, since they occurred on national television. At the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Judge Kavanaugh’s behavior was startlingly non-judicial in nature. From the outset in his prepared statement, he was angry and confrontational in manner. He was aggrieved and complaining about the situation in which he found himself. He was impolite and challenged the integrity of the Senate questioners and portrayed the hearing in the starkest partisan terms.

Kavanaugh made no apparent effort to bring a lifetime of professional expertise and perspective to bear on the difficult issues under consideration. Instead, he was dismissive of the inquiry and was careless on matters of fact that had been asserted by other potential witnesses on the subject under discussion. He made obfuscating responses to questions about the meaning of words. He made no apparent effort to hold emotions in check and shouted at U.S. Senators and accused them of wrongdoing. He repeatedly sought to shift the attention and blame to others for what was taking place. He resisted further legal inquiry into the issues under discussion. He approached the inquiry with an attitude of entitlement and self-pity. His conduct was remarkably unprofessional.

Although Kavanaugh’s behavior was the very opposite of what one hopes for and expects in a judge, it succeeded in its immediate intent of winning the applause of President Trump and his Republican supporters. Yet his performance, which has been accurately satirized on Saturday Night Live, appalled the rest of the country and raised strictly legal questions about his temperament to sit as a judge on any federal court, let alone the Supreme Court.

Next Steps
The situation is unique in that never before has a Supreme Court appointee joined the court at a time when a fellow judge has concluded that misconduct claims against that appointee warrant review and when a former Supreme Court Justice has concluded that the appointee’s behavior was disqualifying.
Technically, Supreme Court justices are not subject to the misconduct rules governing these claims. But if complaints against a sitting Justice are not dealt with in an impartial apolitical manner, then there will be an asterisk against Judge Tymkovich and Justice Kavanaugh for the remainder of their terms, and indeed the U.S. Supreme Court itself.

There is therefore a risk that Mitch McConnell's seeming accomplishment of a “rock-solid Republican majority on the Supreme Court for a generation” may yet turn out to be something of a Pyrrhic victory.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©