Showing posts sorted by relevance for query rudy giuliani. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query rudy giuliani. Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, October 4, 2019

#ukrainegate - Kurt Volker, Rudy Giulian, China, Text Messages & The Impeachment 2020 Re-election Campaign




#sayhisname
Kurt Volker U.S. State Department.jpg
Kurt Volker
Kurt Volker, the former special envoy to Ukraine, gives House Democrats the first deposition in their impeachment inquiry.

Even as President Donald Trump ignited a huge controversy over China and the 2020 election on Thursday, House members were clashing over the closed-door testimony of the former special envoy to Ukraine and Trump’s alleged efforts to pressure officials in that country for dirt on Joe Biden and his son.

The former envoy, Kurt Volker, who is at the center of a scandal that may lead to Trump’s impeachment, spent more than eight hours on Thursday being deposed by lawmakers and aides from three House committees. The committees are looking into allegations that include whether Trump and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani improperly pressured Ukrainian officials to launch an investigation into Biden while withholding U.S. military aid.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi launched an impeachment inquiry last week following the revelation that Trump urged his Ukrainian counterpart, President Volodymyr Zelensky, to investigate Biden during a phone call on July 25.

“This week, current and former State Department officials have begun cooperating with the impeachment inquiry by producing documents and scheduling interviews and depositions," said Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Ca.), Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), and Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the chairmen of the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight and Reform committees in a joint statement Thursday night. "Based on the first production of materials, it has become immediately apparent why Secretary Pompeo tried to block these officials from providing information.”

Volker provided Democrats with 60 pages of text messages and other documents that showed some senior State Department officials were outraged that the Trump administration would try to make aid to Ukraine contingent on efforts to help the president’s reelection campaign.

One text between Volker and Andrey Yermak, a top Zelensky adviser, on July 25 — the day of the Trump-Zelenksy call — linked a Zelensky visit to the Washington to whether the Ukrainians moved ahead with the Biden probe. Volker said "Heard from the White House. Assuming President Z convinces [T]rump he will investigate/ 'get to the bottom of what happened in 2016, we will nail down date for visit to Washington."

And in another more controversial text, a senior American diplomat expressed outrage to any linkage between U.S. aid to whether the Ukrainians took the steps Trump and Giuliani wanted.

“I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign,” said Bill Taylor, the chargé d’affaires at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine’s capital, Kiev, in a Sept. 9 text message.

But Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to the European Union, strongly denied in a response to Taylor that this was Trump’s purpose.

“Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions,” Sondland wrote. “The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign.”

Republicans insisted that Volker testified that Trump never sought a “quid pro quo” from Zelensky, despite the new documents and Democrats’ repeated questions on the topic.

“What we do know is there was definitely not quid-pro-quo,” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), a member of the House Oversight and Reform panel, told reporters after leaving the Volker deposition. “Any comments that would indicate that there was some nefarious purpose on behalf of this president was not backed up by the facts today.”

“If there was an Academy Award for leading the witness, my Democratic colleagues would have gotten three Oscars today,” Meadows added.

Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), without offering specifics, said Volker’s testimony “blew a massive hole” through allegations that Trump sought a quid pro quo from the Ukrainian leader leader.

But Sondland and Volker — under pressure from Giuliani — were also asked to draft a statement saying Ukrainian officials were committed to beginning investigations into Biden and other Trump rivals. Volker testified about that episode to congressional investigators on Thursday, according to several people involved in the hearing. The New York Times first reported the intent to draft the statement.

One source said Volker testified that he wanted a broader statement on the Ukrainians fighting corruption. Giuliani, though, pushed for a statement more narrowly focused on Burisma — the Ukrainian energy firm on whose board Hunter Biden sat — and a possible Ukrainian role in the 2016 U.S. election, a near obsession with Trump. No statement was ever drafted, Volker said.

Volker also told investigators that he warned Giuliani that he was being fed some incorrect information on the Bidens from Ukrainian contacts, particularly Yuriy Lutsenko, the country’s former top prosecutor.

“The ambassador’s view of Ukrainian corruption and Rudy Giuliani’s view of corruption are at odds with one another,” Meadows acknowledged. “I think the ambassador had a much more forward-looking position on what he believes the new Ukrainian government will do, and I think that’s at odds with what Rudy Giuliani believes.”

Giuliani’s role in the Ukrainian scandal was the focus of a “significant portion” of Thursday’s session, according to sources familiar with the hearing, and Democrats accused the former New York mayor and ex-federal prosecutor of being involved in a “shakedown” of the Ukrainiains on Trump’s behalf.

“We saw further evidence that there was a shadow shakedown, and I would say, the lead deputy for the president was Rudy Giuliani,” said Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee. “You had an experienced diplomat, working for free as a special envoy, who in many ways was a front for the work being done on the side, parallel to his efforts, by Rudy Giuliani.”

According to Swalwell, there is “more and more evidence that the president of the United States was improperly using his office, using our taxpayer dollars, to leverage help from an ally in our upcoming 2020 elections.”

Volker is mentioned in a whistleblower complaint that fueled the impeachment inquiry. The complaint notes that Zelensky met with Volker the day after his phone call with Trump, and says the envoy tried to help Ukrainian officials figure out how to “navigate” Trump’s demands.

Giuliani and associate give conflicting accounts on origins of Ukraine caper
The Trump administration held up nearly $400 million in foreign aid approved by Congress as Trump and Giuliani lobbied to announced a probe into the Bidens. Trump and Giuliani alleged that Joe Biden, who was vice president at the time, intervened to block an investigation into Burisma in 2016. There is no evidence that an investigation was underway at the time or that Biden intervened to protect his son’s firm.

Giuliani has also pulled Volker into the episode, insisting that he met with Zelensky’s aides at the request of State Department officials — including Volker — and that he briefed the department about his discussions afterward.

On Thursday morning, Giuliani tweeted out screenshots of texts between him and Volker in which the envoy appeared to be arranging meeting times for Giuliani and a Ukrainian official.

The former New York mayor also railed against Democratic lawmakers pursuing impeachment, though he offered a kind word for Volker.

“Crooked Dems not letting Republicans subpoena witnesses and maybe even question witness,” Giuliani claimed in a tweet. “This is a Star Chamber, illicit and part of their conspiracy to violate constitutional rights condoned by their media lamb dogs. Kurt did nothing wrong.”

Volker has said little publicly about the unfolding drama. But the State Department has defended him in the past, saying that a Ukrainian official had asked Volker to connect him with Giuliani, which he did. Volker is a former career Foreign Service officer and ambassador to NATO who is respected among Democrats and Republicans in Washington.

Many foreign policy hands welcomed Volker’s appointment as envoy in 2017 because of his hawkish views on Russia.

Volker held the envoy position on an unpaid, part-time basis. He also works as an adviser to a lobbying firm and as executive director of a Washington think tank named for the late Sen. John McCain of Arizona.

The implication is that aides to Zelensky — a former comedian who won Ukraine’s presidency in April — were trying to establish a link to Giuliani, given his close relationship with Trump.

It’s likely Giuliani got the new Ukrainian government’s attention in part because he spent much of this past spring talking about Ukraine and alleged wrongdoings by the Bidens.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, November 20, 2020

The Tale Of The "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending): Sidney Powell & Rudy Giuliani Accuse John Conyers, Jr. Of Public Corruption Without Demanding Due Process

Yes, Sidney Powell & Rudy Giuliani are "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) as they hold a press conference to utter and publish accusations that "The Elected Ones" of the politically stratified districts under John Conyers, Jr. were rift with public corruption.

I say we investigate!

Or, have we already?

I say Sidney and Rudy should go ask Rashida if there is still political corruption of criminal activities still going on in her congressional district.

Oh, Sidney and Rudy should go ask Rashida to call for an investigation into these alleged treasonous activities of Detroit by filing, first, with the U.S. Committee on Ethics.

Drats!

I forgot, that was already done, quite a few times, if I correctly recall.

Anyway, just watch them do the legal dilatory distraction dance, because we are already in Detroit, just watching the world realize, that the heavens are falling because this is about gerrymandering, or rather, stealin' the children, land & vote.

Watch Sidney and Rudy not say his name as they speak upon Detroit and Voting Rights, while demanding due process, but not for my Sweetie.

#maytheheavensfall


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, January 23, 2020

IMPEACHMENT: Senate Trial - Day Three - Yamiche Alcindor The Co-Conspirator

First, this happened....

’21 Empty Seats’: More Than One-Third of GOP Senators Reportedly Left Room During Schiff’s Speech


That is why Trump is retwatting those GOP Senators. As a jurist, you cannot just up and walk out during a trial. I do not care what anyone thinks. That is not due process.

That is criminal.

There are reports of 28 who walked out. They disqualified themselves from voting because they were biased.

Why are these GOP Senators ripping on the impeachment trial on twat?

That is biased as a jurist and a blatant violations of orders of the arbitrator, SCOTUS Chief Justice. "Pain of imprisonent".

That is why Trump is retwatting like crazy.

Sergeant at Arms can imprison and stop the impeachment because there will not be a quorum.

Where is the Sergeant at Arms?

Then, this happened...


Then, this happened...


Then, this happened...

I am listening to Hakeem Jeffries.

He was falsely advised.

He has a different subject matter than the rest of those Legal Geniuses.

I say this because he has not been around that long.

I do not believe he knows what Nancy and "The Other Epstein" are doing. Remember, 

Sondland, Vindman and that Hill lie, lie, lie about the 2016 election.

Hakeem is entering the evidence into the record of their lying and Emperor Pence is probably not a happy camper.

The impeachment is not about Trump, but the networks.

He has said nothing about Trump.

He is entering Rudy's phone record with Zelinsky and the White Houses.

This is legally hot.

I smell my Sweetie.....

Oh!!!!!! Volker ond Sondland consulted with Rudy on the draft.

He is entering Rudy's texts.

Rudy never talked to Trump.

There is no record.

It was Zelinsky's aide. Oooooo......

He just dropped Burisma.

You do know no one ever asked Trump if he contacted the FBI, which he did because there is a superseding investigation so we have all the calls, texts, emails.

Hakeem in setting up Trump's defense. This is so hot.

DAMN.....THIS IS STUPID BRILLIANT!!!!!

Zelinsky never got his meeting.

 "The Trump Ukraine Scandal is about weapons". 

Oooooooo......

Nancy and Schiff hate his Hakeem's guts right now, including Romney, and a whole bunch of others, on both sides of the aisle.

They were meeting in the White House to discuss the investigation they were plotting and scheming to set up Trump.

Image may contain: 1 person, text
Yamiche Alcindor
She announced on twat on the death of my Sweetie, and is in constant phone contact with Rudy.

She just dropped that Rudy is the godfather of Lev Parnes' kid.

She said that Rudy has been on the phone all day with her saying that Lev is now lying.

Trump twatted her.

Welcome to Detroit.

#maytheheavensfall

Then this happened....

"Is Sean Hannity a scientologist?" Asks Alec Baldwin.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

JUDICIARY: Chairman Nadler Letter To Attorney General Bill Barr On Rudy Giuliani & Special Channel Communications

Oddly, I could not find copy of the letter on the House Judiciary site.

https://judiciary.house.gov/news/documentquery.aspx?DocumentTypeID=1952

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

IMPEACHMENT: Day 2 & 3 With Colored Commentary By il1usiveman - Testimony of Kurt Volker, Alexander Vindman, Tim Morrison, Jennifer Williams & Gordon Sondland



Public testimony from Volker, Vindman, Williams & Morrison



Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, is scheduled to testify Wednesday before the House Intelligence Committee.



Ukraine widens probe against Burisma founder to embezzlement of state funds

ZlochevskiyN.jpg
Mykola Vladislavovich Zlochevsky 
KIEV (Reuters) - Ukraine has widened its investigation into the founder of energy company Burisma to include suspicion of embezzling state funds, Prosecutor General Ruslan Ryaboshapka said on Wednesday.

FILE PHOTO: Ukrainian Prosecutor General Ruslan Ryaboshapka speaks during a news conference in Kiev, Ukraine, October 4, 2019. REUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko/File Photo
Allegations of wrongdoing at Burisma go to the heart of a U.S. impeachment inquiry into whether President Donald Trump improperly pressured Ukraine’s leadership to investigate his main rival in the 2020 presidential race.

Trump wants Ukraine to launch an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who was a board member at Burisma from 2014-2019.

The prosecutor who has investigated Burisma is Kostiantyn Kulyk, who previously met Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani to discuss accusations against the Bidens.

After he took office in late August, Ryaboshapka launched a wide-ranging audit of criminal cases to see whether they had been conducted properly. Thirteen of them relate to Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky, Ryaboshapka told reporters at a briefing on Wednesday.

Burisma did not respond to a request for comment.

Ryaboshapka’s predecessors oversaw a series of investigations into Zlochevsky, a multimillionaire former minister of ecology and natural resources. The allegations concern tax violations, money-laundering and licences given to Burisma during the period where Zlochevsky was a minister.

Ryaboshapka said Zlochevsky was now suspected of the “theft of government funds on an especially large scale,” but did not provide evidence or details.

Ryaboshapka was speaking after being asked about a document from the general prosecutor’s office that was leaked at a separate press conference by three lawmakers earlier on Wednesday.

The document, only part of which was visible, showed Kulyk suspected Zlochevsky of offences including using his official position to embezzle 800 million hryvnias ($33 million) of money belonging to the central bank.

The investigation is effectively on hold, however, because the Ukrainian authorities cannot determine Zlochevsky’s whereabouts.

The central bank did not respond to a request for comment.

Giuliani has previously told Reuters he met Kulyk in Paris. He said at that meeting Kulyk echoed allegations that in 2016 Joe Biden as Vice President had tried to have Ukraine’s then-chief prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, fired to stop him investigating Burisma. Biden has accused Giuliani of peddling “false, debunked conspiracy theories” for repeating these allegations.

Kulyk told Reuters in October that he had been investigating Zlochevsky for around two years.

Reuters could not independently verify the extent of Kulyk’s involvement, but a source close to the energy company saw a spike in activity by Kulyk in regards to Burisma after Giuliani’s interest in the company and the Bidens had been conveyed to Kulyk’s then superior, Yuriy Lutsenko.

In late January, Kulyk sent Zlochevsky the first of several summons for questioning, documents seen by Reuters showed.

Zlochevsky has not commented on the summons or an announcement by Ryaboshapka in October that his office was reviewing a series of investigations linked to Zlochevsky.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, September 28, 2019

Pompeo Summoned On Impeachment - Will Anyone Ask About Trafficking Tiny Humans?

I bet no one will ask him about the children's trust funds or anything else relevant to trafficking tiny humans.

Tiny humans grow up to vote, in many different Ways & Means!

Former Ukrainian prosecutor spoke with Rudy Giuliani "maybe 10 times"

To inquire about child welfare would mean there would have to be discussions on gerrymandering, which will bring down the heavens.

The suspense is absolutely delicious.

Trump impeachment inquiry: Pompeo subpoenaed by House Democrats

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Photo: 26 September 2019
Mike Pompeo
Mike Pompeo is yet to publicly respond to the House Democrats' demand

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has been ordered by Democrats to turn over documents relating to the Trump administration's dealings with Ukraine.

In a letter, the heads of three House committees subpoenaed Mr Pompeo to produce the documents within a week.

It is the latest move in rapidly escalating impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.

He is being scrutinised for allegedly pressuring Ukraine's president to investigate Democratic rival Joe Biden.

In a separate development on Friday, the US special envoy for Ukraine negotiations, Kurt Volker, resigned, US media reported.

What's the Trump-Ukraine story about?
How easy is it to impeach a president?
Mr Trump has denied putting any pressure on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a phone call in July, when Mr Biden was leading polls to win the Democratic nomination for the White House race in 2020.

Mr Trump has alleged that Mr Biden pressed for the sacking of Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin in 2016 to protect a business that employed his son, Hunter Biden.

Mr Biden did call for the sacking of Mr Shokin, even threatening to withhold $1bn (£813m) in aid to Ukraine. But so did a number of other Western officials who saw Mr Shokin as a hindrance to anti-corruption investigations.

Impeachment is a two-stage political process, rarely exercised, by which a US president can be removed from office for wrongdoing.

Even if President Trump were impeached by the House of Representatives, he is unlikely to be forced out of the White House because Republicans control the Senate.

What is the Pompeo subpoena about?
It was issued in the joint letter by the House's Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Oversight committees.

The committees are headed by Elliot Engel, Adam Schiff and Elijah Cummings respectively.

Media captionDid Trump ask for "a favour" in return for aid to Ukraine?
The letter says the subpoena was issued because Mr Pompeo had failed to comply with the demand to provide requested documents.

"Your continued refusal to provide the requested documents not only prevents our committees from fully investigating these matters, but impairs Congress' ability to fulfil its constitutional responsibilities to protect our national security and the integrity of our democracy," the letter said.

The three committees also informed Mr Pompeo that they planned to request testimonies from five officials, including Mr Volker and the former US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, in the next two weeks.

Mr Pompeo has so far made no public comments on the subpoena.

What is the claim about Joe Biden?
On 25 July, Mr Trump raised Mr Shokin's removal during a phone call with newly elected President Zelensky, details of which were released by the White House this week after a huge row over a complaint by a whistleblower.

What Trump's Ukraine phone call really means
Mr Trump went on to discuss Hunter Biden and the unsubstantiated allegation that his father - then the US vice-president - stopped an investigation into his son's employer by lobbying Ukraine to fire Mr Shokin.

The chief prosecutor's office was inquiring into Burisma, a natural gas company on which Hunter Biden was a board member.

There is no evidence of any wrongdoing by the Bidens.

In a BBC interview, former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin said Mr Shokin was sacked for corruption, denying Mr Trump's claims.

Who is Kurt Volker?
Appointed in 2017 in a volunteer capacity, Mr Volker was a key player in US efforts to help resolve an ongoing crisis in Ukraine that started with the annexation of Crimea by Russia and Moscow's support for separatists in the east.

Kurt Volker is also executive director of the McCain Institute for International Leadership think tank
Mr Volker was mentioned in the whistleblower's complaint on 12 August.

It says that Mr Volker and US Ambassador to the EU, Gordon Sondland, met President Zelensky and other Ukrainian politicians on 26 July.

The complaint says Mr Volker and Mr Sondland "reportedly provided advice to the Ukrainian leadership about how to 'navigate' the demands that [President Trump] had made of Mr Zelensky".

It says that Mr Volker and Mr Sondland had also spoken with Rudi Guiliani, Mr Trump's lawyer, to try to "contain the damage" to US national security.

Why is the July phone call controversial?
Democrats accuse Mr Trump of illegally seeking foreign help in the hope of smearing Mr Biden.

The US president called on the Ukrainian leader to talk to US Attorney General William Barr and Mr Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani about investigating Hunter Biden's past business dealings.

Mr Trump is accused of using military aid to Ukraine as a bargaining tool. The package - which has since been released - was aimed at supporting US interests in a friendly country.

Mr Trump, a Republican, denies any wrongdoing and has dismissed the impeachment proceedings as a "hoax" and "another witch-hunt".

He acknowledged that he had personally blocked nearly $400m (£324m) in military aid to Ukraine days before he spoke to Mr Zelensky, but denied that it was to pressure the Ukrainian leader into investigating Mr Biden.

Few details are known. A lawyer for the whistleblower warned that trying to identify the person could place them "in harm's way".

The New York Times, Washington Post and Reuters news agency identified the whistleblower as a CIA officer.

Their complaint accuses Mr Trump of "using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the US 2020 election".

The declassified document characterises the president's conduct as a "serious or flagrant problem, abuse, or violation of law".

The whistleblower says they had learned from several sources that senior White House officials had intervened to "lock down" all records of the call, particularly an official word-for-word transcript.

"This set of actions underscored to me that White House officials understood the gravity of what had transpired in the call," the whistleblower wrote in the complaint.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, October 5, 2019

Weintraub Of Perkins Coie Sucks Makes A Politically Biased Public Statement From Her FEC Chair

I once asked the FEC about bearing foreign arms in an U.S. election and was dismissed, so I really do not know what the big deal is?

Oh, wait, I almost forgot.

Meet Ellen Weintraub - The Perkins Coie Sucks Legal Genius Who Is Chair For The Federal Election Commission - Has One Seen Marc Elias? #perkinscoiesucks


How is it she can make a prejudicial statement, supposedly to be the chair of an unbiased, judicial body, in the public record, devoid of any due process for POTUS, the Commander in Chief of the Executive Cabinet of which she participates.

She should recuse herself from the Commission, immediately.

She needs to be expelled from office for just being dumb.

In order for an U.S. President to make a request to another nation, it must go through the formal process, which has to go through the U.S. Department of Justice and through the State Department and put on a piece of paper.

Otherwise, it is protected under speech and debate, which is for Congress, not Weintraub, in all of her omnipotence.

The State Department handles the foreign stuff, where the Vice President is the signator.

She needs to be held accountable for her actions, all of her actions because she was mean to my Sweetie and is obviously, not qualified for public office for her lack of candor and/or jacked up deportment.

Her chair is not the bully pulpit of justice.

#perkinscoiesucks

Election Commission chair hints that Trump asking foreign countries for help against Biden violates law

Minutes after President Trump called on the governments of China and Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a potential rival in the 2020 presidential campaign, the chair of the Federal Election Commission posted a reminder that seeking foreign political help is illegal.

In a tweet posted Thursday morning, Ellen Weintraub struck an incredulous tone.

Trump has said he wanted Ukraine to investigate “corruption” by Biden and his son Hunter, but the former vice president is a leading candidate to oppose him for reelection, and as his lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, has admitted, damaging Biden’s reputation is his actual purpose.

Weintraub is a Democrat, according to the FEC website, but was appointed to the commission in 2002, under President George W. Bush. Her nominal term expired more than a decade ago, but she has remained in the post as successive administrations have found it impossible to choose and confirm a successor.

Ellen Weintraub, chair of the Federal Election Commission, and President Trump (Photos: Paul Morigi/Getty Images, Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Ellen Weintraub of Perkins Coie Sucks
On June 13, Weintraub originally posted a statement clarifying the illegality of candidates receiving election assistance from foreign governments after Trump told ABC News he would not alert the FBI if he was approached by a country such as Russia with damaging information about his 2020 opponent, and he would consider the information.

“It’s not an interference, they have information — I think I’d take it,” Trump told ABC. “If I thought there was something wrong, I’d go maybe to the FBI — if I thought there was something wrong. But when somebody comes up with oppo research, right, they come up with oppo research, ‘Oh, let’s call the FBI.’ The FBI doesn’t have enough agents to take care of it. When you go and talk, honestly, to congressmen, they all do it, they always have, and that’s the way it is. It’s called oppo research.”

Candidates often look for damaging information on their opponents, but generally from published stories, court papers or other domestic sources, not from foreign governments.

In response to Trump’s interview in June, Weintraub took the opportunity to remind the nation that what Trump had proposed doing violated U.S. law.

“Let me make something 100% clear to the American public and anyone running for public office: It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election,” Weintraub wrote. “This is not a novel concept.“

On Thursday, Trump was again asked what he was specifically seeking on a July 25 call when he asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for “a favor.”

“Well, I would think if they were honest about it, they’d start a major investigation into the Bidens,” Trump responded. “It’s a very simple answer. They should investigate the Bidens because how does a company that’s newly formed and all these companies, and by the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine. So I would say with President Zelensky, if it were me, I would recommend they start an investigation into the Bidens, because nobody has any doubt that they weren’t crooked.”

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who has taken the lead on the impeachment inquiry against Trump, echoed Weintraub’s warning.

Trump has tasked Attorney General William Barr to reach out to several foreign governments to investigate the role U.S. intelligence agencies played in the 2016 presidential election as a way to counter the narrative that Trump was aided by Russian interference. Special counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers for their efforts to promote Trump’s candidacy, including hacking into and stealing files on a server used by the Democratic National Committee.

Minutes after President Trump called on the governments of China and Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a potential rival in the 2020 presidential campaign, the chair of the Federal Election Commission posted a reminder that seeking foreign political help is illegal.

In a tweet posted Thursday morning, Ellen Weintraub struck an incredulous tone.

Trump has said he wanted Ukraine to investigate “corruption” by Biden and his son Hunter, but the former vice president is a leading candidate to oppose him for reelection, and as his lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, has admitted, damaging Biden’s reputation is his actual purpose.

Weintraub is a Democrat, according to the FEC website, but was appointed to the commission in 2002, under President George W. Bush. Her nominal term expired more than a decade ago, but she has remained in the post as successive administrations have found it impossible to choose and confirm a successor.

On June 13, Weintraub originally posted a statement clarifying the illegality of candidates receiving election assistance from foreign governments after Trump told ABC News he would not alert the FBI if he was approached by a country such as Russia with damaging information about his 2020 opponent, and he would consider the information.

“It’s not an interference, they have information — I think I’d take it,” Trump told ABC. “If I thought there was something wrong, I’d go maybe to the FBI — if I thought there was something wrong. But when somebody comes up with oppo research, right, they come up with oppo research, ‘Oh, let’s call the FBI.’ The FBI doesn’t have enough agents to take care of it. When you go and talk, honestly, to congressmen, they all do it, they always have, and that’s the way it is. It’s called oppo research.”

Candidates often look for damaging information on their opponents, but generally from published stories, court papers or other domestic sources, not from foreign governments.

In response to Trump’s interview in June, Weintraub took the opportunity to remind the nation that what Trump had proposed doing violated U.S. law.

“Let me make something 100% clear to the American public and anyone running for public office: It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election,” Weintraub wrote. “This is not a novel concept.“

On Thursday, Trump was again asked what he was specifically seeking on a July 25 call when he asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for “a favor.”

“Well, I would think if they were honest about it, they’d start a major investigation into the Bidens,” Trump responded. “It’s a very simple answer. They should investigate the Bidens because how does a company that’s newly formed and all these companies, and by the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine. So I would say with President Zelensky, if it were me, I would recommend they start an investigation into the Bidens, because nobody has any doubt that they weren’t crooked.”

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who has taken the lead on the impeachment inquiry against Trump, echoed Weintraub’s warning.

Trump has tasked Attorney General William Barr to reach out to several foreign governments to investigate the role U.S. intelligence agencies played in the 2016 presidential election as a way to counter the narrative that Trump was aided by Russian interference. Special counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers for their efforts to promote Trump’s candidacy, including hacking into and stealing files on a server used by the Democratic National Committee.

Joe and Hunter Biden are not under investigation in the U.S.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, November 15, 2019

IMPEACHMENT: Testimony Of Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch - Day 2 - Including What Was Not Covered In The Hearing

Image may contain: 1 person, text

Detroit

Ousted ambassador felt ‘big threat;’ Trump assails her anew

 Marie Yovanovitch
WASHINGTON (AP) — Former U.S. Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch opened the second day of Trump impeachment hearings Friday providing chilling detail how she felt a “big threat” after being suddenly ousted from her post and learning that President Donald Trump personally called her
“bad news” on his July phone call with the Ukrainian president.

Yovanovitch told the House Intelligence Committee of a concerted “smear” campaign against her by Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and others, including the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr.
As Yovanovitch testified at the Capitol, the president assailed her anew from the White House.

Moments after Trump’s press secretary said he would not be watching the hearing, he went after Yovanovitch as she spoke, declaring that everywhere she served “turned bad.” He said that as president he had the “absolute right” to appoint his own ambassadors.

At the hearing, the career ambassador told the lawmakers her sudden removal by Trump played into the hands of “shady interests the world over” with dangerous intentions toward the United States.
She said she was “shocked and devastated” upon learning Trump said “she was going to go through some things” on his call with Ukraine.

She recalled that as she read the White House’s rough transcript of Trump’s conversation another person said, “The color drained from my face.”

She said quietly, “Even now words fail me.”

Her removal is one of several events at the center of the impeachment effort.

“These events should concern everyone in this room,” the diplomat testified in opening remarks. “Shady interests the world over have learned how little it takes to remove an American ambassador who does not give them what they want.”

The daughter of immigrants who fled the former Soviet Union and Nazi German, she described a 33-year career, including three tours as an ambassador to some of the world’s tougher postings, before arriving in Ukraine in 2016. She was forced out in May 2019.

She denied the accusations against her, including that she favored Democrat Hillary Clinton over Trump in the 2016 election and that she circulated a “Do Not Prosecute” list to former top prosecutor in Ukraine, Sergiy Lutsenko, which she called a “fabrication.”

Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the panel, opened the day’s hearing saying she was “too tough on corruption for some, and her principled stance made her enemies.”
It became clear, he said, “President Trump wanted her gone.”

The top Republican on the panel, Rep. Devin Nunes of California, bemoaned the hearings as a “daylong TV spectacle.”

Nunes complained that Democrats are relying on hearsay testimony from witnesses who only know of Trump’s actions second-hand. He also pressed to hear from the still anonymous government whistleblower who first alerted officials about President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukraine that is in question. “These hearings should not be occurring at all,” he said.

Just as the hearing was opening, the White House released its rough transcript of an earlier call Trump had with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that was largely congratulatory.

Nunes read that transcript aloud. In it, Trump mentioned his experience with the Miss Universe pageant in Ukraine and invited Zelenskiy to the White House. He closed with, “See you very soon.”

Yovanovitch, a career diplomat, who has served both Republican and Democratic presidents, relayed her striking story of being told to “watch my back” and then being suddenly recalled by Trump in a swiftly developing series of events that sounded alarms about a White House shadow foreign policy.

In particular, Yovanovitch and others have described Giuliani, Trump’s lawyer, as leading an “irregular channel” outside the diplomatic mainstream of U.S.-Ukraine relations. Asked during an earlier, closed-door deposition if anyone at the State Department who was alerted to Giuliani’s role tried to stop him, she testified, “I don’t think they felt they could.”

The White House has instructed officials not to comply with the probe, and most have been issued subpoenas to appear.

She and other officials now testifying publicly are providing accounts that Democrats are relying on to make the case that the president’s behavior was impeachable.
With the start of a second day of hearings to consider removal of America’s 45th president, Democrats and Republicans were both hardening their messages to voters.

Americans are deeply entrenched in two camps over impeachment, resulting in a mounting political battle that will further test the nation in one of the most polarizing eras of modern times.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says Trump’s actions toward Ukraine amount to “bribery.”

Trump repeatedly assails the proceedings as a “hoax” and a “sham” and says he did nothing wrong.

The impeachment inquiry focuses on Trump’s July phone call with Zelenskiy that first came to attention when an anonymous government whistleblower filed a complaint.

In the phone conversation, Trump asked for a “favor,” according to an account provided by the White House. He wanted an investigation of Democrats and 2020 rival Joe Biden. Later it was revealed that the administration was withholding military aid from Ukraine at the time.

SEC Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-15974

Respondents:

Natural Blue Resources, Inc.
Cohen, James E.
Corazzi, Joseph A

Documents

Release DateRelease NumberOther Release NumbersName of Document
Jul. 16, 201433-961434-72617Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8a of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Notice of Hearing
Jul. 21, 2014AP-1632Order Scheduling Hearing and Designating Presiding Judge
Aug. 8, 2014AP-1686Postponement Order
Aug. 8, 2014AP-1687Protective Order
Aug. 19, 2014Respondent Cohen's Answer
Aug. 19, 2014Respondent Corrazzi's Answer
Sep. 9, 2014AP-1783Prehearing Order
Nov. 5, 2014AP-1984Order to Show Cause
Nov. 6, 2014Respondent Corrazi's Motion for More Definite Statement and/or Motion for Summary Dismissal of Charges Against Respondent Corrazi
Nov. 6, 2014Respondent Corrazi's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of His Motion for More Definite Statement and/or Motion for Summary Dismissal of Charges Against Respondent Corrazi
Nov. 20, 2014Division's Response to Respondent Corazzi's Motion for More Definite Statement and/or Motion for Summary Dismissal of Charges Against Respondent Corazzi
Nov. 26, 2014ID-710Initial Decision Making Findings and Imposing Sanctions by Default as to Natural Blue Resources, Inc.
Nov. 26, 2014Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
Nov. 26, 2014Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
Dec. 1, 2014AP-2067Order
Dec. 3, 2014AP-2082Order
Dec. 5, 2014AP-2105Order
Jan. 7, 201533-969634-74009Notice That Initial Decision Has Become Final
Jan. 7, 2015Respondent Corazzi's .. Verified Motion to Continue Hearing ...
Jan. 7, 2015Division's Proposed Exhibit List
Jan. 7, 2015Division's Proposed Witness List
Jan. 7, 2015Division's Designation of Robert M. Daines as Expert Witness and Rule 222(b) Statement
Jan. 13, 2015AP-2214Order
Jan. 13, 2015Division's Response to Respondent Corazzi's Motion to Continue 2/9/15 Hearing
Jan. 13, 2015Respondent Cohen's Witness List
Jan. 15, 2015Respondent Cohen's Request for Issuance of Subpoenas
Jan. 16, 2015AP-2229Order Denying Certification for Interlocutory Review
Jan. 16, 2015Verified Request for Certification for Interlocutory Review by the Commission
Jan. 26, 2015AP-2257Order
Jan. 26, 2015Division's Proposed Amended Exhibit List
Jan. 26, 2015Division's Proposed Prehearing Brief
Jan. 26, 2015Revised Expert Report of Robert M. Daines
Jan. 29, 2015Respondent Cohen's Proposed Exhibit List
Jan. 29, 2015Respondent Cohen's Prehearing Brief
Jan. 30, 2015Respondent Cohen's Supplemental Proposed Exhibit List
Feb. 4, 2015AP-2284Prehearing Order
Feb. 5, 201533-972234-74215Order Denying Petition for Interlocutory Review
Feb. 5, 2015Respondent Cohen's Memorandum of Law in Support of His Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain of the Direct Testimony of Robert M. Daines
Feb. 5, 2015Respondent Cohen's Memorandum of Law in Support of His Motion in Limine to Limit Testimony to Period Through Alleged False Filings
Feb. 19, 2015Letter of 2/19/15 to Os from Division Sending the Division's Original Exhibits
Mar. 6, 2015Email to Alj's Office from Division Counsel Stating the Parties Have Reached an Impasse as to Admissibility of a Limited Number of Exhibits in the Proceedings and Requesting a Telephonic Hearing to Resolve Dispute On 3/9 or 3/6 If Not Available
Mar. 17, 2015Division's Post Hearing Brief
Mar. 17, 2015Division's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Mar. 17, 2015Respondent Cohen's Post Hearing Brief
Mar. 27, 2015Division's Post Hearing Reply Brief
Mar. 30, 2015Respondent Cohen's Response to Division's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Mar. 30, 2015Respondent Cohen's Response to Division's Post Hearing Brief
Apr. 9, 2015AP-2523Motion to the Commission for Extension
Apr. 15, 2015AP-2544Order Admitting Exhibits
May 6, 201533-976634-74891Order Granting Extension
Aug. 14, 2015AP-3037Order
Aug. 14, 2015AP-3042Order
Aug. 14, 2015Respondent Cohen's Motion for Stay
Aug. 18, 2015ID-863Initial Decision as to James E. Cohen and Joseph A. Corazzi
Aug. 31, 2015Respondent James Cohen's Motion to Correct Manifest Errors of Fact
Sep. 8, 2015Division's Opposition to Respondent James Cohen's Motion to Correct Manifest Errors of Fact
Sep. 11, 2015AP-3115Order
Oct. 2, 2015Respondent Corazzi's Joinder in Respondent Cohen's Motion for Oral Argument
Oct. 13, 2015Division's Cross Petition for Review of the Initial Decision
Oct. 26, 201533-996634-76271Order Granting Petition for Review and Scheduling Briefs
Nov. 18, 201533-997834-76473
34-76473
Order Extending Briefing Schedule
Jan. 11, 2016Division's Brief on Review of the Initial Decision
Jan. 26, 2016Respondents' Reply Brief on Review of Initial Decision and Request for Oral Argument
Jun. 20, 201733-1037234-80987Stay Notice
Dec. 18, 2017AP-5396Order
Jan. 26, 2018AP-5534Order
Apr. 10, 201833-1047934-83029Supplemental Briefing Order
Jun. 20, 201833-1050934-83481Order Scheduling Oral Argument
Jun. 26, 201833-1051234-83523Order Cancelling Oral Argument
Aug. 23, 2018AP-5954Notice from the Chief Administrative Law Judge
Sep. 12, 2018AP-5955Chief Administrative Law Judge’s Order Assigning Proceedings Post Lucia v. SEC
Sep. 17, 2018AP-5980Order Regarding Three Proceedings Post Lucia V. Sec, 138 S. Ct. 2044 (2018)
Oct. 2, 2018AP-6130Order Assigning Administrative Law Judge
Oct. 12, 2018AP-6175Order Following Reassignment
Nov. 2, 2018AP-6287Stay Order
Nov. 20, 2018AP-6351Order Setting Deadline to Submit Proposals
Dec. 21, 201833-1059834-84916Corrected Order Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©