Showing posts with label SUNY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SUNY. Show all posts

Friday, June 10, 2011

SUNY's broken foundation


What does the Office for Children and Family Services (OCFS) and Child Welfare in New York State have to do with State University of New York (SUNY) Research Foundation Fraud?  According to OCFS - they are partners.


SUNY's broken foundation



Despite its lofty sounding name, the State University of New York Research Foundation is really just another example of New York's shadow government -- a secretive behemoth that considers itself above public scrutiny, even as it handles nearly $1 billion a year in grants for the public higher education system and pays the checks for some 17,000 public workers and students.

The arrogance of this foundation is gratingly outlined in a consultant's report for SUNY Chancellor Nancy Zimpher and SUNY's board of trustees. It describes an entity that was designed to serve SUNY but often keeps its presumed partner as much at arm's length as it does the public and the press, leading to poor communication and distrust.

I would normally publish the report but it is a secret.

It also leads to a failure of SUNY's research to live up to its potential, the report finds. SUNY lags in things like patents, licenses and royalty income, costing it prestige and money.

None of what's in the report should be a surprise to SUNY. After all, the foundation's board includes Ms. Zimpher as the chair, four SUNY presidents and a dean. Yet the board is -- according to some of its own members -- "a joke" that receives little information, is not asked for its views and is kept in the dark by the foundation's management. The board's control seems to have long ago been either appropriated by or ceded to the foundation's president, John O'Connor, a SUNY vice chancellor who is resigning under the cloud of an ethics investigation.

If this was the gist of the entire report, it would be easy to suggest that the state simply dismantle this travesty. But the consultant, Clifford Stromberg of the Washington, D.C. law firm of Hogan Lovells, stressed that the foundation plays a crucial role in handling SUNY's outside grants. Without a flexible entity that's not subject to many of the state's cumbersome contracting rules and delays, he said, SUNY's research efforts would fall behind those of other major universities.

Clearly, though, this research foundation has to be put back on the track of its original mission, which is, in short, to serve SUNY.

That means, above all else, ending what appears to be almost a legalistic game in which the foundation is forever trying to keep itself from being considered a public entity, to the point of hiding information from SUNY itself.

It should not take a nearly $300,000 consultant's study and, now, a forensics audit by the state comptroller, to find out what's going on at this foundation.

Here's a research project for the great minds at SUNY and in state government: Come up with a framework that preserves the foundation's flexibility while ensuring that it is transparent and accountable.

Be prepared to justify your solution.
THE ISSUE:
A report paints the SUNY Research Foundation as secretive and even hostile to the university it serves.
THE STAKES:
A foundation created for public benefit needs to return to its original purpose.

Thursday, June 2, 2011

New York OCFS and SUNY Caught In Lustful, Multi-Billion Dollar False Claims Tryst

What does the New York Office of Children and Family Services have to do with the State University of New York Research Foundation Fraud?  According to OCFS - they are partners: 



What this partnership means is there are conflict of interests which allow for the continuing practice of filing false claims and nothing is being done about it.  The sting from a slap on the wrist quickly fades when dealing with a lustful, multi-billion dollar false claims tryst.
HHS OIG Review of Training Contract Practices at the New York Department of Social Services A-02-93-02006

Public school, private dealings


Public school, private dealings



As the State University of New York looks for more independence, it should be doing all it can to earn the public's trust. Instead, SUNY wraps itself in the cloak of secrecy that already shrouds the SUNY Research Foundation.

The university refuses to release a report on its relationship with the Research Foundation. So much for shedding some light on this rather covert entity that handles $1 billion in grants annually and has been tainted by corruption and patronage allegations for years. SUNY says the report is "privileged."

And therein lies the problem -- with a secret foundation, with SUNY's outrageous pay hikes and housing allowances for top administrators, with a possible no-show job for the daughter of a former Senate majority leader, with the suggestion that higher education is beyond scrutiny: The air of privilege that SUNY exudes is sometimes breathtaking.

The report, done by legal consultant Hogan Lovells US LLP, is on the "Research Foundation/SUNY relationship." Paid for with $290,000 in public funds, the report is said to offer a comprehensive look at the Research Foundation. But Chancellor Nancy Zimpher, who commissioned the report shortly after coming to SUNY in 2009, considers it protected by lawyer-client privilege. SUNY won't even say why she had the report done in the first place.

So let's get this straight: The state-funded SUNY had to pay nearly $300,000 to understand its own murky relationship with the Research Foundation, yet the public that foots the bill for SUNY is told, "none of your business"?

It's all the more of public interest right now, when SUNY Vice Chancellor John J. O'Connor, who also headed the Research Foundation for 15 years, is facing charges from the state Commission on Public Integrity that he hired Susan Bruno, daughter of former Republican Senate leader Joseph L. Bruno, for a no-show job as Mr. O'Connor's special assistant. She resigned the $84,120-a-year job in 2009 amid Times Union inquiries about it. Mr. O'Connor denies the charges and has even asked that a court create an entity to monitor the commission's handling of his case.

Ms. Zimpher, who in recent weeks has been out talking about SUNY's contributions to the state, must appreciate as a public official that she has to take the bad with the good -- and divulge both whether she likes it or not.

If she and the trustees want the Legislature to give SUNY so much independence -- to set tuition, forge private partnerships and manage its affairs without legislative approval -- they have to show that SUNY is willing to be accountable to the public.

And if SUNY refuses, then other state officials should ask why.
This might be a good place for Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who have teamed up to investigate and prosecute corruption in state government, to get started. The comptroller's and attorney general's offices, it's worth noting, were parties to the 1977 agreement that formalized the Research Foundation's role as fiscal administrator for SUNY's grants. It makes perfect sense that they'd want to look at how the foundation is handling things, starting with an audit by the comptroller.
And then let the rest of us in on the secret.

THE ISSUE:
SUNY says a report of keen public interest is "privileged."

THE STAKES:
Secrecy doesn't help SUNY's cause for greater public trust.

NYS. $22 Billion Dollar Medicaid Fraud NYS Health Department and Research Foundation for State University of New York (SUNY)

NYS. $22 Billion Dollar Medicaid Fraud NYS Health Department and Research Foundation for State University of New York (SUNY)


Department of Justice alleged that NYS Department of Health conspired with the SUNY Research Foundation to Engage in Massive Medicaid Fraud.

An action brought by a whistleblower for retaliation by NYS for assisting the Department of Justice in an investigation into NYS’ dirty little Medicaid Fraud secret conspiracy with SUNY Research Foundation she alleges that, Plaintiff, a computer programmer/analyst employed by SUNY RF Center for Development of Human Services (“CDHS”) and a whistleblower who has uncovered SUNY RF’s commission of major fraud upon the Federal government aka taxpayer with regard to an ongoing audit of the Medicaid program, in conspiracy with certain officials at the New York State Department of Health (“DOH”).

Plaintiff, a witness for the federal government in this investigation, has provided the federal government with documentary evidence of a pervasive and unlawful conspiracy among her supervisors at RF to defraud the American taxpayer with regard to approximately $22 billion in annual matching funds which the federal government provides to NY for the Medicaid program. Because of her whistleblowing activities, Plaintiff has been subjected to unrelenting retaliatory conduct by her supervisors at RF, including adverse employment reviews, alteration of her job duties, reassignment of work away for Plaintiff, suspension from work and other discriminatory treatment.

This Isn’t The First Time SUNY Research Foundation Has Been Sued for Fraud
In 1992 a whistleblower plaintiff George Denoncourt filed a false claims act action against the Research Foundation of SUNY. This suit resulted in a $26.97 million which contained only double rather than treble damages as the statute allows and a stern warning to NYS not to engage in fraudulent practices again.

NYS Keeps Getting Caught For Committing Fraud, But There Never Seems to Be Any Consequences
In 2009 NYS was fined for false Medicaid claims whereby NYS and NYC were falsely billing Medicaid for speech therapy services resulting in a $540 million dollar (single damages) settlement against the State of New York,

Just this month (9/2010), the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced a probe into Medicaid payments into nine state institutions for the developmentally disabled after it was revealed the facilities had reimbursement rates of $4,556 per day for each of 1,400 residents. State officials have said the action cost of care is only about one third the rate, and that much of the $1.2 billion in federal matching funds every year supports other state programs. Now, right on it’s heels comes a fraud so large in scope, that it had to be an inside job.



Einstein has said insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
In the case of NY, the Feds keep auditing NYS for fraud. The frauds keep getting bigger and bigger and more and more secretive. While NYS gets fined time and time again, the people running the fraud from the safety of their administrative offices and under the protection of the NYS Attorney General who uses taxpayer money to defend these white collar government criminals who were ripping off the taxpayer cost. After the investigation is done and a settlement reached, the same workers who thought up the government criminal enterprise, go back to work at the same taxpayer paid for salary and pension benefits. Their mission, find another way to steal from the Federal taxpayer.

The Current $22 Billion Latest and Greatest NYS Medicaid Fraud Scheme
A federal grand jury is continuing to examine allegations that state Health Department managers may have conspired with the Research Foundation for the state University of New York to manipulate audits of New York’s $22 billion a year Medicaid program.

The investigation is centered on a federally mandated program that requires states to randomly audit their Medicaid programs to determine the rate of ineligible recipients of Medicaid benefits. The Research Foundation has had a contract to conduct the auditing for the Health Department.

Why, you ask would NYS contract out their auditing requirements to a private entity? Plausible Deniability.

After the Denoncourt Action, settled in 1992, NYS split it’s billing and instead of having NYS offices responsible, NYS put 1/2 the responsibility on the private entity and the other 1/2 on NYS. This way unless you were an insider to the fraud, the NYS employee would be hard pressed to put the 2 pieces together.

Several people who formerly worked for the Research Foundation have alleged that their audits were deliberately sanitized so that New York state would not be penalized for excessive error rates that could have led to New York being penalized or not receiving all or part of approximately $22 billion in federal matching funds.



The workers, who have not been identified publicly, have said officials with the Research Foundation and Health Department intentionally used inaccurate information to manipulate the outcome of the audits so that New York would have a lower error rate. The employees also claimed their access to audit files were restricted and the “random” samples of cases plugged into audits were not random at all.

The allegations also are that the Health Department was able to review and change the audits before they had been submitted to the federal government.

A person briefed on the investigation said two Research Foundation workers who complained to Health Department managers about the situation in April 2008 were fired within days.

Six months later the Research Foundation learned its program was being audited by two federal agencies, the Center for Medicaid Services and the Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Inspector General.

A person briefed on the case said investigators are examining allegations by a former Research Foundation worker that managers for the non-profit agency and the Health Department responded to the audits by ordering data fields to be deleted and replacing them with a second database, which had been sanitized, for the auditors to review.

NYS and SUNY Research Foundation Retaliates Against Whistleblowers
Meanwhile, several Research Foundation workers have alleged they were fired or retaliated against after questioning the practice of altering data or manipulating information such as residency requirements of Medicaid recipients.

Ava Dock, who lost her job at the Research Foundation in December, filed a federal whistleblower complaint against the Research Foundation two months earlier in U.S. District Court in Albany. Dock’s complaint, which is pending in federal court, alleges her job was eliminated because she stood up to supervisors who were altering data in their audits. The complaint seeks at least $250,000 in damages.

Dock’s complaint also accuses an unnamed Research Foundation supervisor of altering records before the information was released two years ago to investigators with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services office of inspector general. The OIG began investigating the New York program in late 2008.

The complaint, and allegations from other Research Foundation workers who have not been publicly identified, accuses the Research Foundation of submitting documents to the federal government purporting to show an “error rate” in its Medicaid program of below the maximum permitted rate of 3 percent. The actual error rate was in excess of 20 percent, the workers have claimed, according to sources briefed on the case.

FCA.Ava.Dock v. OHRD

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

New York State University Medicaid False Claims Complaint

DOJ and HHS Investigate State Uninversity of New York Medicaid Fraud                                                            

Ava.Dock v. Research Foundation of the State of New York                                                            

Sunday, April 4, 2010

New York Child Welfare Fraud Sophistication

For those of you who are following my political journey to end Medicaid fraud in child welfare, I am quite sure some of you are wondering why I am calling out academic institutions.

Well, in the spirit of National Child Abuse Propaganda Month, one finds it is such academic institutions that generate data as well as graduates who will go forth in the world validating their received public letters. This is just a very nice way of saying the universities pump false child abuse data to keep the federal dollars flowing in crank out minion-graduantes to keep promulgating the racket of child welfare fraud.

The name of the game is Medicaid fraud. The only way to catch the fraud is after the bill is paid.

The case deals with Medicaid fraud in child welfare and the "switcho-chango" factor the State Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) did with the State University of New York (SUNY) and Cornell.

Feds probing Medicaid fraud at SUNY firm

By BRENDAN J. LYONS, Senior writer
First published: Sunday, October 25, 2009

ALBANY -- A federal criminal investigation into systemic fraud related to audits of New York's Medicaid program is targeting numerous supervisors and employees at the state Health Department and the Research Foundation for the State University of New York.

Interviews with people familiar with the matter and documents obtained by the Times Union show that in recent weeks at least seven employees with those agencies received letters from federal prosecutors in Albany notifying them they are targets in the investigation. The letters say evidence is being prepared for presentation to a federal grand jury for indictment in a case involving fraud, health care fraud, falsification of records and conspiracy.

The targeted employees were encouraged to contact prosecutors to discuss a pre-indictment settlement, and to consult attorneys if necessary. The letters were sent by assistant U.S. Attorney Sara Lord, who specializes in white-collar crime cases.

Federal investigators with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services are pursuing whether the scandal reaches into the upper levels of management for the SUNY Research Foundation and the state Health Department, according to sources briefed on the case. At stake is more than $22 billion in annual matching federal funds for Medicaid. The allegations are that Research Foundation workers, who were under contract with the state Health Department to audit the program, were pushed to manipulate data related to the percentage of ineligible people receiving benefits...more

Stay tuned for more exposure of New York kid scams, the home of the Sophisticated Child Welfare Fraud Syndicate.