If the 17 christian (non-capitalization is intentional) child placing agencies can turn away prospective
These faith-based, nonprofit corporations are exempt from any oversight and typically will proceed with recommendations of extended stays in foster care and termination of parental rights on the premise of whatever they consider to be moral turpitude.
What is next? Denial based on the color of one's skin? It could be.
Michigan Children's Institute Superintendent Bruce Hoffman, groomed by Bill Johnson, already makes such decisions when considering adoption. Based on the Cotton doctrine, the decision to deny adoption must be proved to have been "arbitrary and capricious", not that the decision was wrong or discriminating.
No where in these Bills is there mention of the decision process. The Bills are severely flawed because they contain prejudicial decision making, or rather, the Bills legislate the courts via prejudice.
Adoption of foster children is a federally funded service. To deny anyone services based on a questionable internal policy is nothing short of being unlawfully discriminating.
There is no due process in child welfare.
I hope HHS financially penalizes the State, again.
Why would anyone want to "preserve" such a corrupt system which was designed as a predatory aggressor to the poor?
It is because they want the money, Medicaid dollars. Today, it is child placing agencies, tomorrow it is Social Security.
All policies begin with children.
The faith-based angle using the Religious Freedom Restoration Act began years ago and started out of Michigan. It failed to succeed in ratifying the Constitution. Now, they have revamped to diffuse it State by State.
These Bills are the beginning of the dismantling of civil rights through privatization.
Pay close attention to these names:
George Darany, of Dearborn,
Robert Kosowski of Westland,
Sam Singh if Lansing, the Representative who offered amendment of 90 effectuation, and,
Harvey Santana of Detroit,the Representative who introduced the Bill.
What gets me the most is there is language to ban the state departments from regulating these agencies.
These Bills are nothing but legislated Medicaid fraud in child welfare.
Michigan House OKs bills on faith-based adoption refusal
LANSING — Faith-based adoption agencies could refuse to serve prospective parents based on their religious beliefs under a package of bills that passed the state House of Representatives Wednesday.The bills, which would allow the agencies to refuse service to same-sex or unmarried couples if that goes against their religious beliefs, are moving as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments next month on whether same-sex marriage should be legal in Michigan and several other states in the region.
All three bills passed on 65-44 votes, with Democratic Reps. George Darany, of Dearborn, Robert Kosowski of Westland and Harvey Santana of Detroit, joining all but one Republican in voting for the package. State Rep. Mike Callton, R-Nashville, voted against the bills.
The votes came after passionate debate in the House with supporters saying the bills ensured that the state continue to offer as many adoption options as possible.
"These bills simply preserve the system we use today," said Rep. Andrea LaFontaine, R-Columbus.
"This bill is not about who can and who cannot adopt a child . it's about ensuring the most alternatives for people wanting to adopt a child." Tom Hickson, vice president for public policy at the Michigan Catholic Conference, said the bills were an important tool for finding loving homes for all children.
"Securing diversity in child placement and protecting religious liberty rights for faith based agencies will move children out of the foster care system," he said in a statement.
"Without this legislation there will likely be fewer providers, which means fewer opportunities to find homes for kids that need them."
Opponents, said the bills simply allow state-sanctioned discrimination.
"It's not just discrimination. It's writing a check for discrimination. It's state-funded discrimination," said Rep. Jeff Irwin, D-Ann Arbor.
"The only reason you're voting for this bill is that you're blinded by your own faith." Rep. Jon Hoadley, D-Kalamazoo, one of two openly gay members of the House, said it's scary to be gay in Michigan and the adoption agency bills only contribute to that fear.
"These bills put the best interest of the agency over the best interest of the child," he said. "And it violates the constitution because it elevate some religious beliefs over others.
"Rep. Marcia Hovey-Wright, D-Muskegon, said the bills come as the nation is experiencing a sea change in attitudes toward same sex marriage and the legal rights that are afforded to newly married couples.
The state should look at how it spends its money for adoption services, she added. "The state needs to reevaluate this discriminatory policy," she said.
"I truly value what they provide in our commuities, but I disagree with them imposing their religious beliefs on everyone else."
In the 2014-15 budget year, $19.9 million in state and federal funds went toward supporting adoption agencies for adoption and foster care services, according to the state DHS. Nearly $10 million of that total went to faith-based agencies that would be covered under the religious objection bills.
The bills — HB 4188, 4189 and 4190 — now move to the state Senate for consideration. The same package of bills stalled in the Senate last year and Amber McCann, spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Arlan Meekhof, R-West Olive, said the subject hasn't been addressed by the GOP caucus yet.
Gov. Rick Snyder said last week during a call-in radio show with Michigan Public Radio that he had reservations about the bills and the impact it could have on children getting adopted.
Later in the week, he told reporters, He was in favor of children being adopted by "loving families" and "loving parents."
He didn't specify if that included same sex couples.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment