Showing posts sorted by relevance for query sam brownback. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query sam brownback. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

A Prayer To Mitch McConnell For The Nomination Of Sam Brownback

Oh please, take Brownback away from Kansas,
Senator McConnell, please.
Dear Senator Mitch McConnell,

Please, oh, please, in your infinite wisdom as Senate Majority Leader, will you ensure that Sam Brownback's nomination is successfully confirmed.

The children and families of Kansas, many who have reached out to me, implore you to give us, some form of hope in our struggle to survive the scourage of the Governor's manufacturing of poverty policies, by taking Sam Brownback off our hands.

Sir, we beseech thee, in your honorary and official titles, to solicit across the aisle to secure the necessary votes to install Brownback into this federal position.

We have offered Kris Kobach as a sacrifice to appease the Senate leadership in D.C. in confirming the nomination of Brownback.

We do not want either gentlemen back.

We want Brownback to resign as governor.

He was never supposed to be governor, but Kobach manipulated the entire campaign finance system so that profits from KVC, a non-profit child welfare organization, would fund political campaigns unreported through false claims to Medicaid, stripped legislative constituency services where there are no civil rights, and has commenced the systematic stripping of property from the people to stick it in land banks as another tool to gerrymander districts, further stripping voting rights from the people.

We want him to be held to federal scrutiny of the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Justice to uncloak what he, and Kobach have done to the children, and the legacies of Kansas.

We want him in the international spotlight, for the world to see how he and his associates at KVC have profited from children legally kidnapped and sold into the human trafficking industry called adoption.

Godspeed.

Brownback heads to D.C. to meet with McConnell amid uncertainty about confirmation

Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback will meet with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in Washington on Wednesday as the Kansas Republican inches toward leaving his state office for a federal post.

McConnell’s spokesman, David Popp, confirmed that the meeting would take place but offered no details on the GOP leader’s meeting with Brownback.

President Donald Trump nominated Brownback to serve as the next ambassador-at-large for international religious freedom in July, but his confirmation process has moved slowly, with the governor poised to move into the final month of the year without a confirmation vote scheduled.

Brownback told reporters last week that he is hoping for a vote before Christmas. He has begun handing over some of his most important duties to Lt. Gov. Jeff Colyer, including the power to make Cabinet appointments and leadership over the state budget.

Brownback’s spokeswoman did not immediately respond to phone calls about the meeting with McConnell.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee narrowly advanced his nomination in October by an 11-10 vote after Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia raised concerns about Brownback’s record on LGBT rights.

Democrats have indicated that they plan to force Republicans to take extra procedural steps to confirm Brownback, which could delay a vote until next year.

Sen. Pat Roberts’ office confirmed that the Kansas Republican will join the governor during his meeting with McConnell.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, February 3, 2018

Brownback Sold Kansas To Israel

Image result for israel flagI have said for almost a decade that Kansas and Michigan were sister states in the privatization socioeconomic policy experiments.


Kansas and Michigan Dabble in Experimental Policymaking


Related imageMichigan went the authoritarian way with its Emergency Manager Law empowering NGOs with a slow transfer of powers through denationalization through authorities, because there is nothing you can do.

No FOIA.  No civil rights.  No oversight.

Kansas went the way of privatizing its actual governmental departments through UCC1s and just destroying any redress of grievance, because everything was sold out to social impact bonds, overseas, to Israel.


Wow. Just wow.

Now, Brownback has been appointed as the U.S. State Department Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, in charge of the international faith-based propaganda slush fund of USAID.

Brownback is about to sell off the United States to Israel.

Does Brownback have dual citizenship?

If he does, he needs to be deported for treason.

Courtesy of Wikileaks.

Brownback

Released on 2013-10-10 00:00 GMT
Email-ID1459911
Date2010-08-19 09:10:24
Fromemre.dogru@stratfor.com
Toalparslan.akkus@sabah.com.tr
Brownback


Alparslan selam, asagida bizim analistin cevabi ve Brownback'in Israil
yandasligini ornekleyecek bir makale var.

--

Senators don't work for lobby groups... lobby groups work to influence
them. They key thing is that Brownback is heavily influenced by the
Israeli lobby. He regularly speaks at AIPAC conventions and is an ardent
supporter of Israel. It isn't difficult to see who is influencing his view
on the AKP.

An example:

Brownback wants to remove the waiver in embassy law

ByA Eric FingerhutA A. November 3, 2009

Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kansas) is planning to introduce legislation today
or tomorrow that would remove the presidential waiver from the law calling
for the U.S. Embassy to be moved from Tel Aviv to Jersualem. He announced
his sponsorship of the Jersualem Embassy Relocation Act of 2009 on Tuesday
afternoon at a Capitol Hill meeting of the Jerusalem Conference.

The legislation would call on the State Department to move the U.S.
Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and get rid of the waiver in the 1995
Jerusalem Embassy Law that every president since then has renewed every
six months.

The Orthodox Union praised the legislation. Their press release is after
the jump:

Today, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, the
nationa**s largest Orthodox Jewish umbrella organization, applauded the
United States Senate for the introduction of the Jerusalem Embassy
Relocation Act of 2009.A

Since 1967, Jerusalem has been the united capital city of Israel, yet
the United States has failed to recognize it as such. The United States
maintains its embassy in the functioning capital of every country with
which it has diplomatic relations. Israel has remained the exception to
this rule. The Jerusalem Embassy Relocation Act of 2009 calls for the
State Department to move the American Embassy from its current location
in Tel-Aviv to its rightful place in Jerusalem. The legislation will
also remove the Presidential waiver from the Jerusalem Embassy Law
(Public Law 104-45) enacted in 1995.

The Orthodox Union would like to extend special gratitude to Senator Sam
Brownback of Kansas for his continued leadership on this issue and for
his chief sponsorship of the Jerusalem Embassy Relocation Act. The
Orthodox Union also wishes to thank the original co-sponsors of this
important piece of legislation including, Senators Cornyn, Inhofe and
Kyl.A

Nathan J. Diament, director of the Union's Institute for Public Policy
stated:

It is time to move the US embassy in Israel to its rightful place in
Jerusalem. Just as the United States locates its embassy in the duly
designated capitals of other nations, so too it should locate its
embassy in Israel's recognized capital.

--
Emre Dogru

STRATFOR
Cell: +90.532.465.7514
Fixed: +1.512.279.9468
emre.dogru@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Kansas and Michigan Dabble in Experimental Policymaking

Kansas, Michigan, and a few other States are concentrating in experimental policy changes to its public welfare and tax structures.

Kansas has rejected Medicaid expansion while Michigan has accepted.

Michigan has restructured to implement the expansion while Kansas has chosen to take a different route.

Both states have a sordid history in its dealing with federal child welfare funding and should be watched as all experiments with policy begin with child welfare.

 2nd Court Slams Brownback For Underfunding Education To Expedite Kochs’ Tax Cuts 
 
Brownback2Now that Republicans control both houses of Congress, Americans should brace themselves for a serious Koch-style assault on revenue and government agencies. Last year, Mitch McConnell told Kansas Governor Sam Brownback that Republicans were panting to enact a Koch-Kansas economic assault on America that Brownback imposed by giving the rich monumental tax breaks at the expense of the state government and residents. At the time, McConnell swooned over Brownback’s trickle-down massacre and told him “It’s exactly what we want to do here in Washington, but we can’t do it yet only controlling the House.” With control of the House and Senate, Republicans can proceed with the same reckless abandon for the government and it is probable that like Kansas, public education is in for some seriously major funding cuts.
For the second time in six months, a Kansas court panel ruled that the state is still not spending enough money on education to “provide a suitable education for children.” In June, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the state must increase funding for public K-12 schools to comply with Kansas law mandating that public schools are funded at constitutionally required levels. However, as is their habit, Brownback’s Republicans disregarded the Kansas Constitution and Supreme Court ruling and slashed funding for the state’s public schools to both provide tax cuts for the wealthy and keep their population ignorant. Keeping the population dirt-stupid worked nicely for Brownback’s re-election; particularly after his Koch brother trickle-down tax cutting scheme demolished the state’s economy.
According to the latest ruling against trickle-down Brownback, Kansas is failing miserably to spend enough money on public schools to provide a suitable education for every child. The three-judge panel’s ruling said, “We found the Kansas K-12 school financing formula constitutionally inadequate in its present failure to implement the necessary funding to sustain a constitutionally adequate education as a matter of current fact as well as the precedent facts that supported the Montoy decisions. That is still our opinion.”

The Montoy decision refers to a 2006 school funding lawsuit, and several others including the earlier Supreme Court ruling, that the judges said informed them beyond a shadow of a doubt that “yes, money spent on education makes a difference.” According to evidence, the state needs to increase its education spending at least $548 million a year to comply with Kansas’ Constitutional requirement. Brownback is going to appeal the District Court panel’s decision to the Kansas Supreme Court.

The governor’s spokesperson, Eileen Hawley, released a statement on the decision saying “We will review today’s decision carefully. The Governor will work with legislative leaders to determine the best path forward.” However, Brownback and the GOP-dominated Legislature will hardly even attempt to comply with this latest ruling any more than the last because it will jeopardize Brownback’s aggressive trickle down tax cuts for the rich and elimination of corporate taxation enacted according to the Koch brothers and trickle down guru Arthur Laffer’s directives. Laffer, like the Kochs and Brownback, claim that it is important to cut the state’s revenue stream in order to increase state revenue and create a jobs bonanza. Since the Koch-Brownback tax cuts for the rich and corporations, Kansas is hemorrhaging revenue, lagging the rest of the nation in job creation, has suffered several credit downgrades, and according to many Republicans is facing bankruptcy in less than two years. Credit rating agencies concur and have enacted several concurrent downgrades.

Public school officials also released their own statements on the decision. Wichita Public Schools superintendent John Allison said, “An educated workforce is key to Kansas’ economic success. I am pleased to see the court’s affirmation that an adequately-funded education is of vital importance to Kansas. While we won’t immediately know the impact of the ruling, we do believe today’s court decision is a great one for today’s students and the future of our state.” Dodge City Superintendent Alan Cunningham said, “In order to accomplish the goal of making every child college or career ready, we need appropriate resources to do our jobs. We continue to have faith that the Kansas legislature will work to ensure that every Kansas child has access to an adequate and fully funded formula for education.”
Kansas public school educators have other problems on their plates as a result of Brownback’s $1.1 billion unfunded tax cuts for the rich besides the inadequate, and unconstitutional, cuts to education. On Tuesday, Kansas education officials reported that the number of homeless students in the state’s schools continues to increase at alarming levels due to low wages and pathetic jobs situation. According to the Kansas State Department of Education, there were nearly 10,400 homeless children attending public schools last year; a thousand more than a year earlier. In fact, Wichita and Kansas City public schools reported there were increases in homeless students of 45% and 20% respectively over the course of just one year.
The coordinator of the education department’s child homelessness program, Tate Toedman, said that Kansas families are taking longer to recover from homelessness than in the past due to the state’s poor economic situation, poverty wages, and lack of jobs. All schools are required by the federal government to keep track of homeless students to receive support and service programs designed specifically to keep children in school. Kansas is so broke, though, that after Brownback’s $1.1 billion unfunded gift to the wealthy there are insufficient funds to keep homeless shelters open.

As an example, one homeless shelter specifically for families with school-aged children in southeastern Kansas had to close its doors in July, and it is all down to the increasing state budget shortfall directly resulting from Brownback’s tax cuts for the rich. The CHOICES Family Emergency Shelter had provided a place to live for 350 homeless people every year, most of whom are children.

The closure is another victim of the state budget shortfall that is so severe that even after cutting homeless shelter funding by half for all of 2014, Kansas could not afford to spend $100,000 to keep the shelter open for the rest of the year; but Brownback and  Republicans will not do anything to “jeopardize” the epic tax cuts for the rich and corporations, including Koch Industries and its libertarian owners.
It is important to note that Republicans, including Brownback, held up Kansas and its unfunded tax cuts for the wealthy-elite and corporations as the idealized Republican economic plan for all America to follow. One Kansas Republican even admitted that one of the primary goals of the Koch-Brownback economic plan was cutting government down to size and they have been successful in slashing the state public education system to unconstitutional levels as well as cutting public retirement accounts to pay for the tax cuts.
Despite the abject failure in Kansas, incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told Brownback “It’s exactly what we want to do in Washington,” and now that they control both chambers of Congress, it is certainly what they will attempt. The only thing standing between the entire nation, the federal government, and public education going the way of Kansas is President Obama’s veto pen. Because without him as a firewall, the entire nation will become the Koch brothers’ vision of America and will look exactly like Kansas.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

My Apologies For Neglecting Child Welfare Fraud In Kansas

I deeply regret my neglect in reporting on the open trafficking of children through Kansas Department of Children and Families, but it has recently come to my attention that this Kansas Department of Commerce, has privatized as a UCC1, meaning, they can only be prosecuted in international waters, maritime law.

I will expound upon the UCC1, in detail, at a later time as it is being used in an extremely unique manner of asset forfeiture of humans.

The Kansas Department of Commerce warehouses its foster care and adoption programs, where it has secret special trust funds that are only for employees to access, and not for the children.

Kansas Department of Commerce, also uses these foster care and adoption funds to invest in other operations across state lines.

There have been found questionable land bank and other real estate activities, not to mention directly funding political campaigns with these federal funds.

This is probably why the mother had her daughter's services taken away after reporting fraud to state legislatures.
Rep. Stephanie Clayton from the 19th district apologized to a woman who said her daughter had her KanCare services reduced and an administrative law judge ruled against her daughter because the mother reported KanCare to state legislators. 

The following Twitter activity will illuminate the how Kansas uses propaganda of dirty data to legitimize its fraudulent operations.



Here is a screenshot of an elected official of the State of Kansas and subject matter expert on child welfare fraud, Bambi Enniga Hazen, Original Source Child Welfare Forensic Analyst & Consultant being blocked from commenting, or rather being stripped of her civil right to redress grievence of governance.

As retaliation in the form of either cutting off services to disabled children or even having CPS come to remove children and place in foster care is a normal pattern of practice in Kansas when one attempts to redress greivance of governance, I will be doing more in depth reporting on their child trafficking operations and their exposing the privatized financial crimes, in the best interest of the children, of course, because there are no civil rights, or FOIA for that matter, in Public-Private Partnerships.

That is how they get away with fraud in child welfare.

It must be noted that there is uncertainty as to whom the rightful governor is at the present moment, which puts into question the legitimacy of all appointments and legislation signed into law.

Brownback should know a thing or two about profiting from child trafficking, which leaves us to wonder why he allows these fraud schemes to flourish in Kansas.

Again, my apologies for neglecting Kansas, but it is all connected.

Stay tuned.

Awkward: Brownback Said He Was Leaving as Kansas Governor. He Hasn’t.

TOPEKA, Kan. — Gov. Sam Brownback of Kansas was giving a tender goodbye.
Speaking to a roomful of fellow Republicans over lunch at the Wichita Pachyderm Club last month, he mused about his next act, a post in the Trump administration as ambassador at large for international religious freedom, which was announced in July.

“As I pass from the stage here in Kansas, I leave with a warm thought and good feelings of all the good-hearted people in this wonderful state of Kansas,” said a smiling Mr. Brownback, whose seven years at the helm have been punctuated by a firm turn to the right and a revolt from some in his own party.

Jeff Colyer, a plastic surgeon who is the lieutenant governor, was widely expected to succeed Mr. Brownback and kick off the 2018 legislative session, and Mr. Colyer even announced a new cabinet appointment.

But on Monday afternoon, as lawmakers began meeting in the State Capitol for the start of the new legislative session, Mr. Brownback was still the governor.

And there is no certainty about when he might actually depart this stage, even after the White House on Monday renominated him for the post. The entire matter has left some Kansans befuddled, some Democratic lawmakers smug, and some Brownback supporters a little sheepish.

Some Kansans said that it was not entirely clear who was truly in charge of the state, and for how long.

“From day to day, no, we don’t know,” said Jay Armstrong, a carpenter, as he picked up a hot dog at a gas station in Topeka on Monday morning. “Are we going to wait until we vote for a new governor? Or are we going to be governor-less?”

It has been nearly six months since Mr. Brownback, 61, announced that he would be leaving for a new job during his second term as governor. The holdup appears to be in Washington: A Senate committee held a hearing on his nomination and narrowly endorsed him in October, but he did not receive a vote in the full Senate.

A new year has brought new complications. Though Mr. Brownback has been renominated to the post, a relatively low-profile appointment, he will still have to be confirmed by the Senate.

Meanwhile, Mr. Colyer, who is 57 and from suburban Kansas City, is in the wings, a patient deputy waiting for his moment. Mr. Brownback is planning to deliver the annual State of the State address in Topeka on Tuesday.

In the eyes of many Kansans, the whole thing is getting a little awkward.

“Our poor state has such a weird reputation right now anyway,” said Teresa Briggs, co-president of the League of Women Voters of Kansas. “But Brownback doesn’t seem upset, or like it’s anything out of the ordinary. I personally would be embarrassed. It’s very uncomfortable for everybody.”

Bob Murray, a spokesman for Mr. Brownback, said in an email that the governor “fully expects” to be confirmed for the ambassadorship. He attributed the delay to the Senate’s focus on passing a tax bill at the end of 2017.

Members of Mr. Brownback’s own party seem just as puzzled by the situation as Democrats.

“I figured it was a done deal,” said State Representative Leo Delperdang, a Republican from Wichita. “Now I’m just not convinced it’s going to happen.”

Representative Brett Parker, a Democrat from Overland Park, said the last six months have been spent in a confusing state of limbo, with Mr. Brownback having one foot out the door.

“I don’t think he’s doing a service to citizens of Kansas,” Mr. Parker said. “There’s a lot of sentiment that says, ‘Can he just go to Washington already?’ ”

For much of last year, the governor appeared eager to do just that.

After sweeping into office in 2011 with promises to make Kansas a model of conservatism, he signed his signature tax cuts into law during his first term, promising that they would fuel growth. But fiscal distress followed, with the state collecting hundreds of millions of dollars less in revenue each year.

Eventually, Mr. Brownback’s own party revolted. In June, the Republican-controlled Legislature voted to roll back the tax cuts, overriding the governor’s veto.

“It was a rejection of his governorship,” said Patrick R. Miller, a political-science professor at the University of Kansas in Lawrence. “Then the ambassadorship happened and people thought, ‘This will go quick. Then he won’t have to suffer the humiliation of serving out the rest of his term.’ ”

Even his critics in Kansas conceded that the job as ambassador was well suited to Mr. Brownback, a convert to Catholicism who frequently speaks of his faith. Announcing the nomination last July, he wrote on Twitter: “Religious Freedom is the first freedom. The choice of what you do with your own soul. I am honored to serve such an important cause.”

The governor seemed to begin gradually handing control over to Mr. Colyer last fall. In November, it was Mr. Colyer, not Mr. Brownback, who appointed a new leader of Kansas’ beleaguered child welfare agency. Mr. Colyer began to appear more frequently in public than his role as lieutenant governor typically required, lawmakers said. He was a prominent voice at luncheons and legislative meetings to discuss the 2018 session. The next budget, Mr. Colyer’s spokesman said in November, would be handled by Mr. Colyer “to ensure a smooth transition.”

Throughout the fall, legislators said they kept hearing rumors that Mr. Colyer’s inauguration would be happening in the next week or two. But as 2017 drew to a close, so too did the chance for Mr. Brownback to get a confirmation vote.

Last week, Mr. Brownback addressed the uncertainty about his role in Kansas by saying on Twitter: “Looking forward to another great legislative session. I will remain Governor until confirmed by the U.S. Senate.”

In the State Capitol for the first day of the new legislative session, Mr. Colyer smiled politely on Monday when asked if he was any closer to knowing when he would succeed Mr. Brownback.
“Nope, no — we believe he’ll be renominated here shortly,” Mr. Colyer said several hours before the White House announced the renomination of Mr. Brownback on Monday.

The Kansas City Star called in December for Mr. Brownback’s resignation, writing that Kansans “need a real, full-time governor and not one who’s waiting for his ride.”

Even members of his own party say they wonder if he should step down.

There is a crowded field for the Republican nomination for governor in the 2018 campaign (Mr. Brownback would not be able to run again because of term limits). Mr. Colyer is still relatively unknown statewide, a circumstance likelier to shift if he were elevated to governor. Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state, is considered the front-runner in the Republican field.

State Representative Ken Corbet, a Republican, said he believed either man — Mr. Brownback or Mr. Colyer — would do a fine job as governor this year. But only Mr. Brownback, he said, can make the final choice.

“Everybody would like to have an end to this,” Mr. Corbet said of the uncertainty over Mr. Brownback’s departure date. “But he’s governor until he resigns or serves his term. That’s Realville, right there.”
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, November 4, 2017

Brownback's One Heart: Kansas Campaign Finance & International Child Welfare Fraud

To begin, I want to give much love to the journalists of this Kansas City Star article: Bryan Lowry; Steve Vockrodt; and, Hunter Wooda.

Then, I want to call out another child welfare fraud scheme they have unwittingly identified.

One Heart Project is nothing but a money laundering scheme to fund political campaigns in Kansas, but, in this particular case, I am going to take it a step further as there is a strong, international theme behind it.
Kansas One Heart Project

Whatever it is, Kansas Governor Sam Brownback and former Secretary of State Kris Kobach are all up in it.

Besides, why would a state senate have to confirm the appointment of an individual for chairman of a foundation?

Foundations are private corporations.

Government if public.

This is fraud.

While Antonio Soave was in Brownback’s cabinet, friends profited at taxpayer expense

Less than two months after he left Gov. Sam Brownback’s administration, Antonio Soave was hired to launch a program in Kansas City for a Texas-based charity that previously had no footprint in Kansas or Missouri.

Steve Riach, the founder of the One Heart Project, which serves at-risk youth, lauded the former Kansas commerce secretary’s passion and skill in an August news release.

It was not the first time the two had collaborated professionally. Over the last year and a half, the state agency that Soave ran has paid Riach’s Texas-based film production company more than $300,000 in taxpayer dollars to produce commercials to promote Kansas businesses.

Soave, an Olathe Republican, now is running for Congress in Kansas’ 2nd District. He launched his bid shortly after the One Heart Project announced his hiring. But that job came to an end Tuesday after The Star began asking questions about Riach’s contract with Soave’s former agency.
The Star reviewed hundreds of pages of documents, including more than 30 contracts signed during Soave’s time at Commerce, and spoke with multiple former Commerce officials, several of whom raised serious concerns about conflicts of interest and use of state resources.

At least nine of Soave’s friends or business partners, including his law school roommate, received Commerce Department contracts for consulting and marketing services, costing the state tens of thousands of dollars a month during Soave’s 18-month tenure as secretary.

“I believe we (the consultants) were a group of around 10 to 12 or so,” said Jamal Bafagih, one of the consultants. “These are people who knew Antonio Soave, the Commerce secretary. And in fact, he knew them. They were friends.”

Contractors reached by The Star gave similar accounts of their work for Soave: Many were longtime friends and acquaintances of Soave before his appointment to the Commerce Department. They said that he was a man of integrity and that he wanted to use their contacts to find business opportunities for Kansas.

They also could not identify specific opportunities that materialized.

Lawmakers of both political parties expressed shock when told of the Commerce Department contracts, which they said underwent little oversight during a period when the state was mired in a financial crisis.

“I wish we could get that money back,” Rep. Stephanie Clayton, an Overland Park Republican, said Thursday. “We need that money. I am just aghast at this.”

The initial contract with Riach’s SER Media was signed in February 2016 — a few months into Soave’s tenure at the agency — and the most recent extension was signed by Soave and Riach in May of this year, about a month before Soave stepped down from the agency and three months before he started working for Riach’s charity.

“Look where he ends up getting a new job,” said one former Commerce official, who still works in the state and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Changing Kansas’ image

Soave had a varied career before he took his position in Brownback’s cabinet in late 2015, including stints in the world of professional soccer and television. He was working as a college soccer coach the week before Brownback appointed him to his post. He also had been running an Overland Park consulting firm, which court records say was operating at a loss in the years immediately before his appointment.

Soave would not consent to a phone interview, but he did provide responses about SER Media’s contract and other contracts by email.

He asserted that there is “no connection between the contract with SER Media and my hiring at One Heart. In fact, my employment at One Heart was suggested and recommended by another One Heart board member” other than Riach.

Riach said in an email that he first met Soave in early 2015, but that he “went through a normative process for projects like this by submitting a proposal and budget. For over 25 years, our company has produced films, documentaries, television shows and spots that have aired on networks such as ESPN, Fox Sports and NBC.”

Riach said his company has “not seen nor been made aware of any perception of a conflict of interest. The entire process of SER Media gaining the work was an open, and as I understand competitive, process.”

Regarding Soave’s recent hiring by his charity, Riach said One Heart interviewed 15 candidates for the Kansas City executive director’s position. Soave’s hiring was approved on a 10-1 board vote, he said.

However, on Thursday a spokeswoman for the One Heart Project said Soave was no longer working there.

“The board engaged Mr. Soave to serve the organization for a 90-day period. That 90 days came to an end on Oct 31. Mr. Soave is now turning his focus back to his business and personal interests. We are grateful for his service,” the charity said in a statement.

One of the SER Media commercials featured Garmin’s chief product architect, Wai Lee, talking about immigrating to Kansas from Malaysia. Another highlighted the work of Overland Park-based engineering giant Black &Veatch, while another profiled Wichita-based fast food chain Freddy’s Frozen Custard & Steakburgers.

The former Commerce official questioned the commercials’ effectiveness in spurring business for the state and said they diverted money from other agency projects.

“He wanted these workforce commercials to be shown all across the country,” the former official said. “How the hell do you spend that much money and people haven’t seen them?”

Soave stood by the marketing strategy.

“The perception by many companies outside of Kansas was that the state was a ‘fly-over state’ and not a destination state. That is the perception we worked diligently to change,” he said.

“Well-produced television commercials were part of that strategy. We aired those commercials nationally on Fox Business Channel, MSNBC, CNBC and Bloomberg precisely to tell the story about the state of Kansas. In fact, we received many positive comments about those commercials from business people across the nation.”

Kansas Department of Commerce commercial featuring Garmin's Wai Lee

Garmin's Chief Product Architect Wai Lee discusses his passion for art and technology, and why Kansas is a great place to live and work.
Kansas Department of Commerce
But a list of successful deals that Soave sent this week that he said were struck while he was Commerce secretary included Garmin, Airbus, Cargill and the University of Kansas — entities that had expanded but were doing significant business in Kansas long before he arrived at the agency.
Rep. John Carmichael, a Wichita Democrat who sits on the House commerce committee, expressed concerns about the contract when informed that Soave had gone to work for a charity founded by Riach.

“This administration has a long history of self-dealing and back-slapping,” Carmichael said. “… If what you say is correct, this appears to be one of the most dramatic examples of the cronyism and backscratching ever since Gov. Brownback and Lt. Gov. (Jeff) Colyer arrived at the statehouse.”
The timeline of events raises questions that Kansas should investigate, said Stephen Spaulding, an attorney and chief strategist for Common Cause, a national group that advocates for greater government accountability.

“It stinks,” he said. “I think there are legitimate questions about whether and how taxpayer dollars were spent to reward friends of this guy ... and in exchange for what. ... I think the appropriate bodies should take a close look at who paid who for what and when.”

Rep. Russ Jennings, a Lakin Republican, agreed that Soave’s decision to go to work for Riach’s charity raises questions.

“Would it raise someone’s eyebrows? Sure,” Jennings said. “Is it a technical violation of our ethics laws? Perhaps not, but it certainly would raise eyebrows to the extent you might say, ‘How wise is that?’ 

Brownback said last week that he was not aware Soave had gone to work for a charity run by the owner of a company that secured a state contract under Soave.

“I’ll take a look at it,” Brownback said. “I didn’t know who he was working for.”



Gov. Brownback answers questions about Antonio Soave

Gov. Sam Brownback discusses Antonio Soave’s tenure as secretary of Commerce as he enters the Capitol on a windy day in Topeka. Soave, a candidate for Congress, accepted a job in August with a charity founded by a man who had a lucrative state contract during his time as secretary.
Hunter Woodall and Leah Becerra The Kansas City Star

‘We’ve got a lot of contracts’

Brownback said he and Soave parted ways amicably, but Soave’s former chief of staff, Martin Kupper, described to The Star a period of tension during the last year.

“By the beginning of 2017, an atmosphere of intimidation had developed in the Governor’s office and this was placing undue pressure on us to the point that it was interfering with our ability to do our job,” he said in an email.

Kupper held a $5,000-a-month consulting contract with the agency for six months before taking on the position of Soave’s chief of staff. Kupper said he had worked with Soave in the past on both business and charitable projects before accepting his position at Commerce.

Soave currently faces a lawsuit from another business partner he brought to Commerce: Paola Ghezzo, a native of Italy who lives in Lawrence.

Ghezzo had a $6,000-a-month consulting contract. The arrangement ended about the time she sued Soave for fraud in June.

Ghezzo accused Soave of using her $500,000 investment in their Overland Park company, Capistrano Italia, “as his own personal piggy bank, in part, to support and finance his own lavish lifestyle.”

Soave has denied the allegations, but he blamed them for causing Brownback to force him to resign in a court filing.

Brownback avoided answering directly when asked last week if he had concerns about Soave hiring Ghezzo and other associates for state contracts.

“We’ve got a lot of contracts as a state,” Brownback said. “Commerce has a lot of different contractors. We’ve had contract employees (a) long time. It’s not an unusual practice. It’s been — we’ve had contracts. It’s been a pretty regular practice.”

On Friday, less than a day after The Star published this story, Brownback recast his position on Soave’s time at Commerce and his practices in awarding contracts, and he said for the first time that Soave had been terminated.

“During his time as Commerce Secretary, Antonio Soave did a number of positive things but also presented a number of problems that resulted in his termination,” the governor’s office said in a statement. “Among those problems, he entered into several consulting contracts that reflected a lack of judgment and that the Governor felt were inappropriate. These contracts were either terminated or not renewed as appropriate under the circumstances.”

Soave subsequently issued his own statement on Friday, saying he had resigned “after mutual accord and agreement” despite his previous court filings that say he was forced out.

Regarding consultants’ contracts, Soave said Friday: “It is important to note that I followed all internal policies and procedures on all procurement matters, including with the hiring of consultants. ... Each and every procurement scenario required several signatures. We were very careful to comply with all existing policies.”

In his earlier email to The Star, Soave called it “customary for an incoming Secretary to bring some of his colleagues and/or business people with him to the Department. As a businessperson for many years, I desired to bring some new ideas and approaches to the Kansas Department of Commerce.”
The state has relied on business consultants in the past, but a former Commerce official, who served under multiple secretaries, said the state used fewer contractors and vetted them more thoroughly.

“I think where it was different was how those folks were chosen and just the number,” the former official said. “When we had contractors historically, they went through a pretty rigorous selection process. ... There were a lot of people who had an association with Antonio in one way or another.”
Joseph Germinaro, a Pittsburgh businessman who had a $1,000-a-month contract with the agency, said he had known Soave from when they were roommates at Michigan State University College of Law.

“We’ve always been close ever since that time,” Germinaro said. He recalled working for the Commerce Department with other people Soave knew.

“Ultimately, I think for most of the people on there, the driver was their relationship with Antonio,” Germinaro said. “That was the motivation, to do whatever we could to help his office do well.”

Germinaro said he knew of companies that gave Kansas a look and “did some sort of transaction” as the result of the consultants’ work, but could not immediately identify specific details.

Matthew Mitchell, a business consultant in New Mexico who bills himself on his website as the “bottom line prophet,” signed on with the Commerce Department in 2016. He was paid $5,000 a month.

Mitchell said he met Soave in the 1990s while Mitchell worked for Lucasfilm, a California movie studio founded by Star Wars creator George Lucas. Soave approached Mitchell to work as a consultant for Commerce because of his contacts in the business world, Mitchell said.

“I have clients that are very large companies,” Mitchell said. “I was going to make all that available to Antonio and the state of Kansas.”

Mitchell would not identify prospects he directed toward Kansas other than to describe one of them as a top investment banker in the Chicago office of Morgan Stanley. He said another effort involved trying to make Kansas the computer software coding center of the United States.

At least five of the contractors have donated to Soave’s congressional campaign. Bafagih, for example, in September gave Soave $2,700, the maximum donation before the primary. Bafagih said he thinks Soave would represent the interests of small businesses in Congress.

“I did it for a friend and did it for myself. As a small-business owner, he would be a great advocate for us,” said Bafagih, chief operating officer of Entilaq, a firm that helps U.S. companies find business opportunities in the United Arab Emirates.

Bafagih, who lives in Texas, signed a $1,000-a-month consulting contract with Soave on April 1, 2016, to find business leads for the Commerce Department.

“We found some that were interested and came and looked at the opportunities, but never came to fruition,” Bafagih said.

Bafagih said he worked for the Commerce Department for less than a year before he was told that budget problems had put an end to his contract.

“That’s why it didn’t work out,” he said. “I wish it continued for a little while; I’m sure we would have had success here.”

Pascale Henn, a Lenexa attorney who said she knew Soave socially, also received a contract from the Commerce Department in 2016. Hers was worth $5,000 a month.

As a lawyer, Henn advises small businesses. For the Commerce Department, she said, she encouraged her out-of-state clients to consider doing business in Kansas. She forward them marketing materials from the state agency.

“In my existing practice, I was working with businesses all the time,” Henn said. “If it was appropriate, I encouraged them to do business in Kansas. ... It was really to help generate business development in Kansas, if it was appropriate.”

Henn said her work with the Commerce Department lasted about three or four months.
Greg LeRoy, the executive director of Good Jobs First, a national watchdog group that focuses on economic development, criticized the reliance on private consultants rather than state employees.

“That’s really problematic,” LeRoy said. “If I were running a commerce agency, I would never want that function fractured among multiple consultants because institutional memory counts for everything here.”

He said the fact that some of the consultants had other business interests with Soave raised questions about whether this was the best use of taxpayer dollars.

Soave said in an email that he selected “a group of business people from around the country who could provide us with great business leads from a number of locations at a reduced cost — much less than what we were paying to other consultants similarly situated. Their job as business development consultants or advisors was to generate new leads. Those leads would then be passed on to our people within Commerce to ‘work’ those leads and follow-up on those leads.”

Soave said that the use of consultants enabled him to cut the agency’s overall costs, contending that the people he contracted with provided better services that the state’s previous contractors for economic development.

“Having said that, there was no conflict of interest. I followed internal policies and procedures with all contracts and hiring,” he said. “I consulted our internal legal department within the Kansas Department of Commerce to ensure that all policies and procedures were followed at all times.”

Clayton, a member of the House commerce committee, was unimpressed with the results of the consultants and called for more oversight of such contracts.

“Nobody likes cronyism, and that’s what this is,” she said. “We let go Commerce positions that were actually valuable. ... We used to have people who actually brought people in and it’s replaced with this? It borders on corrupt. I’m so offended.”

Former Commerce officials also raised concerns about Soave’s expenses during his time as secretary.
“He made sure we ate very well,” a former Commerce official recalled about dinner meetings with Soave.

Soave spent $29,673 in state money on meals and travel during the 2017 fiscal year, according to documents obtained through an open records request.

The bulk of that money paid for flights and hotel costs as Soave traveled to Washington, Paris and other cities to promote the state’s business and to pay for meals when he hosted representatives from foreign countries and companies. But Soave also regularly took staff members and consultants out to dinner at expensive restaurants without any business prospects present.

“Travel and engagement are part and parcel of our work to generate more investment in Kansas, bring more business to Kansas, and create more — and better — jobs in Kansas,” Soave said.

Soccer buddies

One of Soave’s most frequent dinner companions, according to his receipts, was Stefano Radio. The two had worked together over the years as business partners and soccer coaches.

Under Soave, the Commerce Department paid Radio $3,500 a month for marketing services. The payments were routed through Radio’s company College Life Italia, a Kansas City firm that helps Italian student-athletes find placements with American universities.

A spokesman for the Commerce Department said the contract was for Radio, who opted to be paid through his existing limited liability corporation. That enabled him to take advantage of Kansas’ since-rescinded tax exemption for LLCs.

Soave_soccer2
Antonio Soave (center),
the former Kansas Commerce secretary,
instructs at a soccer clinic.
Before their time at Commerce, Soave and Radio ran soccer clinics together and organized tournaments. Radio said one of his special projects for Commerce was to organize soccer clinics in Garden City and Dodge City this year.

“I worked closely with local communities to ensure sponsorships. We were able to involve Sporting KC as well,” he said in an email.

A spokesman for Sporting Kansas City confirmed the team’s involvement in the events, which were originally scheduled for April but canceled because of a snowstorm.

The Dodge City clinic took place in September, while a new Garden City event has yet to be scheduled, said Jonathan Kaplan, the team’s spokesman.

Several former Commerce officials questioned the event’s relationship to the agency’s mission of economic development. Soave called it a way to engage the region’s Latino community.



Radio, a former professional soccer player and native Italian, said in an email that he led a direct mail campaign with a goal of attracting foreign companies to invest in Kansas. “I was the main contact for European companies generating multiple leads for the State of Kansas. I worked closely with Atlantia, Savino del Bene, Salini Impregilo, De Cecco, Barilla and several other companies,” he said.

 But one of the companies Radio mentioned, pasta manufacturer Barilla, said in a statement that it “is currently unaware of any business activity in Kansas City or the states of Missouri and Kansas more broadly.” It also said it was unaware of Radio.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, January 8, 2018

Kansas Asks Taxpayers To Payback HHS For Medicaid Fraud And Their Loan Sharks

Jeff & Gina, sitting on a deficeit,
P-I-S-S-I-N-G

How to Keep Yourself From Yelling at Kids Even When You ...
"Ooooooo, I'm telling!"
Pissing on themselves because they may face a state budget deficeit which meanss they will not be able to pay on those social impact bonds in KVC, and probably, for my cursory investigation has turned up so far, other curious UCC1 activities of the State of Kansas.

Hold your tight to your unicorns, boys and girls, because I am getting ready to tell the UCC1 Tales in Child Welfare Fraud.

That increase is not going to the kids.

That increase is going to pay the bonds.


See, only a $500,000 shortfall I am sure Brownback, once he is sworn in to his new position will find a way of backdoor USAID filling that pesky budget shortfall to pay those social impact bonds in child welfare services.

Besides, Marilyn can just lobby for more social impact bonds for the shortfall.

A social impact bond is nothing but a privatized loan shark, using children as collateral.

In the scheme of privatization, the corporations will then be beholdened to the parental rights of the goods, which I consider to be nothing more than the trafficking of tiny humans.

This is where that UCC1 comes in.

Stay tuned.

Kansas budget proposal to include $16.5 million increase for child welfare services

Lt. Gov. Jeff Colyer and Department for Children and Families Secretary Gina Meier-Hummel announce that they will seek an additional $16.5 million over two years to bolster child welfare programs at DCF, Monday, Jan. 8, 2018, in Topeka.
Jeff & Gina, sitting on a budget deficeit
L-Y-I-N-G
 — Lt. Gov. Jeff Colyer announced Monday that the administration will seek a $16.5 million funding increase over two years to bolster child welfare services at the Department for Children and Families.

DCF Secretary Gina Meier-Hummel joined Colyer at a news conference to announce the plan, just hours before the Kansas House and Senate were scheduled to gavel in the first day of the 2018 legislative session.

"DCF is charged with protecting our most vulnerable Kansans, and our goal with our budget was to make sure we have the resources needed to take care of the issues we see," Colyer said.

In recent years, DCF has been beset by a wide range of problems that eventually led to the retirement in December of former DCF Secretary Phyllis Gilmore and to the appointment of Meier-Hummel, of Lawrence.

Those problems included children being taken into state custody and forced to sleep in social workers' offices because of a lack of emergency-placement homes, as well as more than 70 children in foster care who have been reported missing.

Those issues also prompted lawmakers last year to form a special child welfare task force, which is scheduled to issue its report and recommendations in January 2019.

Colyer listed several areas where the new funds would be focused, including the hiring of 20 additional child welfare staff; the hiring of investigative staff to help track down missing children; fingerprinting and background checks for foster care providers; improvements to a center where people can report suspected abuse and neglect; and more funding for family-preservation programs that are designed to prevent at-risk children from being taken into foster care.

In addition, the administration is asking to hire an outside consultant to perform a top-to-bottom review of the agency.

"We have been consulting with folks across the country since I've been in office a little over a month now," Meier-Hummel said, "and we know we are targeting the right things to focus on, but certainly we'll want to bring some additional experts to the table."

Colyer said about half of the $16.5 million would come from the state general fund, with matching funds from the federal government.

Meier-Hummel said if it's approved, it would be the biggest single one-time increase in child welfare funding in the state's history.

She also said that since she took over the agency, it has had success tracking down some of the runaway foster children. She said it's a constantly changing population, but that the agency has found approximately 110 children who had been reported missing at one time, while another 70 are still not found.

Of the total amount, Colyer said, about $4 million would be sought as an enhancement to the current fiscal year's budget, while the remainder would go into the next fiscal year, which begins July 1.
The request comes at a time when lawmakers are under intense pressure from the Kansas Supreme Court to increase funding for public schools. But Colyer said the administration believes lawmakers would be able to address both issues.

"We have enough cushion within the budget to deal with this," he said. "This is a high-priority thing, and we need to deal with it."

Senate Majority Leader Jim Denning, R-Overland Park, who attended Monday's news conference, said he was impressed with what he had heard and that he supported the proposal.

"She needs some extra resources, but it's a priority item," he said. "When we get the full budget, we'll be able to evaluate it."

Gov. Sam Brownback's budget director, Shawn Sullivan, is expected to release full details of the budget proposal to the Legislature and the news media Wednesday morning, the day after Brownback's State of the State address.

Releasing details of the governor's budget plan before the plan is released to legislators is unusual at the Statehouse, but publicizing the DCF budget proposal appeared to be part of the gradual handing-over of power from Brownback, who is expected to resign pending his confirmation to a diplomatic post in the Trump administration.

Colyer said he expects Brownback's nomination to be voted upon on the U.S. Senate floor early this year.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Why Kansas Will Not Pay Back $18 Million In Child Welfare Fraud

Said Kansas to the U.S. DHHS OIG
To begin, let us get one thing straight.

Kansas does not have to give back a red cent and neither do any of the other States busted by the HHS OIG for child welfare fraud.

Besides, Kansas used the money for political campaigns, personal inurement and to pay off some dividends to its investors of the state's social impact bonds.

$17 Million Reasons How Kansas Pays Child Welfare Social Impact Bonds


In the spirit of fuchsia...

Kansas took millions it shouldn’t have, federal probe says. But will it give it back?

Kansas took nearly $18 million in federal funds that it shouldn’t have, a federal government watchdog says. It wants the state to give the money back.

There has yet to be a HHS Decisions Appeal Board ruling on this, which means the federal government has not even commenced the process.

Kansas rejects the findings.

This rejection takes the challenge to the next administrative level and which will not see the light of day in a civil nor criminal court of law and can go on for years.

“We don’t believe we did anything wrong,” said Angela de Rocha, a spokeswoman for KanCare, the state’s Medicaid program.

Of course they did nothing wrong because Kansas has been submitting false claims to the federal government for years where the state has constructed and incorporated administrative policies absolving itself from any misdeeds of false claims as it kicks the can down the proverbial road to the privatized entity, KVC and KanCare.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General alleges Kansas incorrectly counted some children in seeking bonus payments to offset the cost of children enrolled in Medicaid, a federal program run by states that provides health care to the uninsured. That led to more bonus payments than Kansas should have received.

Kansas did not incorrectly count some children in seeking bonus payments to offset the cost of children enrolled in Medicaid because these 'miscounted' children will eventually end up in the state's foster care system just because the economic policies were intentionally designed to 'target' these populations.

Even if some of these children are missing, there is nothing written in stone that the state has to cease submitting cost reimbursements.

A November report by the Office of Inspector General recommends Kansas refund $17,796,598.
The Office of Inspector General audited bonus payments from 2009 through 2013. The nearly $18 million represents almost half of the bonus payments Kansas received during that time, which totaled $36.6 million.

Some of this federal funding was used to pay its state Financial Participation Rates, which is illegal, but HHS OIG will not do a damn thing about it, and everyone knows this.

The dispute between Kansas and the Office of Inspector General centers on the way the state calculated the number of children enrolled in Medicaid – specifically the Children’s Health Insurance Program – for the purposes of the bonus payments. The report says Kansas overstated its enrollment.
Kansas maintains it followed guidance given by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on how to make the calculations. But the OIG says CMS correctly explained how the calculations should be made.

CMS did properly calculate the overstated enrollment but nothing is going to be done about it because it would interfere with economic development of KVC funding political campaigns and acquistion of land.

Yes, the state revenue generated from these transgressions are used to acquire land in KVC investments and its individual associates.

“Kansas understands the importance of utilizing Federal Medicaid funds appropriately. This was no exception,” Christine Swartz, the state’s deputy Medicaid director, wrote in a July letter to the Office of Inspector General.

Brownback set it up so that its private contractors could generate funding for political campaigns, mostly state campaigns as its campaign finance reporting system is poorly structured to hide to decipher what actually is an issue campaign for a private contractor and a political campaign.

The complaint, below, illuminates how KVC solicits under the guise of child welfare issues where many of its state elected and administrative officials function in the capacities of being on KVC payroll, advisory boards, and lobbyists.
KanCare, which put private companies in charge of managing the state’s Medicaid program, was launched by Gov. Sam Brownback in January 2013. The program moved nearly all state Medicaid enrollees into health plans run by Sunflower and two other managed care organizations, Amerigroup and UnitedHealthcare.
Leary sued in October, shortly after it was reported that the three companies running KanCare collectively lost $76.2 million in 2014 after incurring losses of $110 million in 2013.

The federal report says that after considering Kansas’s comments, the OIG stood by its findings and recommendation.

Now, the question is, "What is OIG going to do about it?"

The OIG’s recommendation that Kansas give the money back remains just that – a recommendation – de Rocha emphasized. She said CMS has not sought the funds’ return.

Kansas has yet to even file an appeal to be ruled upon which is why CMS has not sought the funds' return.

The report comes as Kansas seeks reauthorization of its privatized Medicaid program, known as KanCare. The state must obtain permission from CMS to continue the program.

Kansas was denied reauthorization in January.

Audits of other states have also found bonus payments that should not have been allowed. Another report released this month found that Ohio had been overpaid by $29.5 million.

“In previous audits…we found millions of dollars in unallowable bonus payments,” the Kansas report said, “therefore, we identified (Children’s Health Insurance Program) bonus payments as a high-risk area.”

So far, CHIP reauthorization has yet to go through and Tom Price, under federal investigation, has resigned.

As demonstrated in the KVC complaint, below, there is no indication that Kansas is going to pay back the funding from its false claims of Medicaid because it is currently in its state court suing a whistleblower for putting their dirty deeds on a public platform.

What I really want to know is why, a private child welfare contractor, that submits cost reimbursements to Medicaid, owns intellectual property and is allowed to engage in private fundraising without having to report what it does with the money.

But I know what Kansas does with the money, and now, you do, too, and the state has all intentions of using Medicaid dollars to make sure it keeps its money.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Kansas Privatizes Poor Children For Profit

In order to understand why Kansas and its "Michigan privatization revenue maximization replication
"Homes for Children" (pre-code for foster care)
experiment"
is not going so well, let us reflect upon the history of the "residuals of the peculiar institution" in its child welfare system.

Kansas-Nebraska Act Just Alike

Kansas CPS FALSE FLAG

Kansas, Meet the Queen of Judicial Lobbying: Maura Corrigan

More the likely, no one even took the time to go through the links I have provided, above, but that is not the point, here.

The point is that there is a delicious trail of spectacular morsels which have been placed in the faces of the imperialistic morality parade, or as I like to call it, "Privatization in the name of God".

Kansas CPS snatching poor kids for free labor
Back in the days, after the "glorious" (stated with sarcasm) Emancipation Proclamation, selling children as chattel was a lucrative alternative form of labor acquisition called orphan trains, for the purposes of saving souls.

Yes, poor parents, typically immigrants and emancipated slaves, who could not afford foundling homes to care for their children while they worked in slave conditions, ended up witnessing their children being shipped of to the burgeoning West where parental prayers of hope for their children were met with an deafening silence all because the parents were poor, the mother was alone, and the child labor was free.

Kansas, living the residuals of stripping sweet grass for the American dream of agriculture, experienced the Great  Dust Bowl, and other ills of poverty..

The response, to glorify child poverty, was the "Wizard Of Oz".  " There is always hope in fantasy".

So, If the lawmakers, community leaders and all other stakeholders interested in the economic future of the State of Kansas have yet to follow the "Yellow Brick Road" to understanding that they are on the wrong path to socio-economic sustainability through privatization, then I guess, we must sit back and morbidly laugh at the reconstruction of the oldest form of survival, selling chattel, the oldest form of survival.

Look at your own data.

So, if the people of Kansas cannot understand what privatization is, then, let them continue to experience it first hand, until they repulse themselves.

New national report questions privatized government services like those in Kansas


 — At a time when the state of Kansas' privatized child welfare programs are coming under heightened scrutiny, a new national report says privatization generally leads to lower quality services, especially for the poor and people of color.

The report, by the Washington, D.C., think tank In the Public Interest, says that privatization, especially at the state and local level, is threatening the very mission of programs that provide public goods and services.

"Private companies have left social safety net programs in tatters," the report states. "Many workers employed by government contractors have plunged further into poverty because of declining wages and benefits. And as private interests continue to siphon money away from public services, the dismantling of public goods not only perpetuates pervasive economic inequality, but also contributes to increasing racial segregation."

In the Public Interest describes itself as a research and policy center whose goal is to "ensure that government contracts and agreements and related public policies increase transparency, accountability, efficiency, and shared prosperity and opportunity through the provision of quality public goods, services, and assets."

Over the last 20 years, Kansas has gone further than many other states in privatizing social safety net services for the poor and underprivileged.

In 1997, during former Republican Gov. Bill Graves' administration, Kansas became the first state in the country to hand over virtually all of its child welfare services, including foster care and child adoption programs, to outside contractors.

More recently, in 2012, Gov. Sam Brownback's administration fully privatized its Medicaid program, turning over responsibility for paying claims and managing patient care to three for-profit insurance companies and changing the name of the program to KanCare.

And in 2013, the Brownback administration outsourced its child support enforcement program to private contractors.

All of those moves have been controversial to varying degrees, but none more so than foster care and adoption, which is now the subject of an ongoing Legislative Post Audit review, which is due to be released in February.

Concerns about privatized child welfare services also came up Sept. 30 when the State Finance Council, a group made up of the governor and legislative leaders, approved paying $100,000 as partial settlement to the family of a 4-year-old boy who was killed while in custody of the state's foster care system.

Senate Democratic Leader Anthony Hensley, of Topeka, said after that meeting that he opposed privatizing child welfare services during the Graves administration, "because this is the type of thing that I think the government should be responsible for ... and this is a perfect example of why I believe I was right in opposing the privatization of our child welfare system."

According to In the Public Interest's report, such tragedies are not uncommon under privatized child welfare programs, and the negative consequences of privatization fall disproportionately on the poor and people of color.

"Researchers have found that Native American, African American, and Latino children in certain states are, compared with white children, removed from families at higher rates once identified by child protective services," the report states, citing a 2011 study in the journal Protecting Children.

"Children of color also stay in foster care for longer periods, experience more placement moves, and exit the foster care system without permanence, while their parents receive fewer services."

ITPI executive director Donald Cohen said the fundamental problem with privatization is that it's based on the promise of cutting costs. And while some contractors may be able to perform the job at a lower cost than government, he said, public agencies still need people to monitor the contractor to make sure the job is being done right.

"They always say they can save money by doing it," Cohen said during a telephone interview. "But agencies never increase their monitoring staff, because it’s all about saving money. If you don’t watch, bad things happen. When you contract to paint your house, if you’re not watching a little bit, bad things happen."

"It’s not all crookedness," he said. "It may be corruption or it may be incompetence. It may be unintended events. There’s no shortcut to doing high quality stuff in services. It costs money. It requires expertise."

Cohen also noted that monitoring the performance of an outside contractor is often more difficult than monitoring the state's own employees.

"The distance between the person doing the purchasing — which is who is accountable to the public and basically responsible for the outcomes — the distance between that person and the person providing the service is now longer because there are intermediaries," he said.

And the distance gets even greater under models like the one Kansas uses, where two major contractors provide services in different regions of the state, and those contractors then subcontract with more than a dozen local-area subcontractors.

Privatization still has its advocates in Kansas, especially within the Brownback administration which says KanCare — the privatization of Medicaid through managed care plans run by private insurance companies — marked a significant improvement to the state's Medicaid system.

Prior to KanCare, much of the Kansas Medicaid program was already privatized. Pregnant women, children and families, who make up the bulk of the Medicaid population but only a fraction of its cost, were enrolled in managed care plans administered by private insurance companies.

KanCare extended that model to the remaining Medicaid population, primarily the elderly and disabled, who make up a smaller share of the population but account for a much larger share of the overall cost.

"The previous system was a one-size-fits-all system which did not provide people with a choice of plans and services available to them under KanCare," Lt. Gov. Jeff Colyer said in an email statement.

"There are more than a dozen states following our lead and implementing KanCare" said Brownback's spokeswoman, Eileen Hawley, argued that KanCare has slowed the rapidly spiraling cost of Medicaid while providing patients with better care.

"Each individual with a complex condition under KanCare has a care coordinator who makes sure they are getting the full care they need whether it is medical, mental health or home-based care," she said.

But even the supporters of privatization in Kansas concede that it still requires vigorous monitoring and oversight by the agencies that outsource public services.

In 2015, the conservative Wichita-based think tank Kansas Policy Institute and the libertarian think tank Reason published a paper on the benefits of privatization that included a list of "best practices." Among them were suggestions to focus on "best value" rather than "low bid" contracting, and ensuring accountability through "rigorous monitoring and performance evaluation."

"Governments should never sign a contract then walk away," the report said. "The public sector role does not end with privatization, but rather shifts to a position in which public managers are responsible for ensuring that their private partners live up to their contractual commitments."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©