Thursday, June 23, 2016

Hillary Clinton And The Story Of Privatization Of Child Welfare Fraud In Political Campaigns

For more than a decade, I have decried the schemes of child welfare fraud, yet, no one has heeded my voice nor the desperate, silent voices of children in poverty.

No Democrats.

No Republicans.

No Independents.

No elected officials.

No religious organizations.

Not even the U.S. Department of Justice. #DOJ

Why?  Because these child welfare organizations are Too Small To Fail. and child poverty is a multi-billion dollar industrial complex, insulated from public scrutiny of its internal operations by the same elected and appointed officials who use their public offices to solicit more funding, either from individual or corporate donors who secure tax write-offs, or, as a vehicle to launder money into corporate secret tax havens.

This is why I have dedicated my life to "End Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare", a quick and dirty tagline to publicly open discussions of what is going on in the privatization movement.

These corporations salivate over the thought of capturing and controlling the Social Security Trust Fund, and, in the grande scheme of doing so, slowly strip the away the rights of society by removing the guarantees in the security of a peaceful and thriving civilization.

Child poverty should always be consider the standard economic measurement to the success of a nation.

Right now, the U.S. is not doing very well.  It is leading the world in developed countries with the highest rate of child poverty.

For almost two decades, I have attempted to document any and all supportive evidence of my claim that non-profit corporations profit from child poverty.

Even more egregious is that political campaigns are funded through charitable contributions to these tax exempt, bogus, child welfare organizations which convert these fraudulently solicited funds into dark money, to be funneled into political campaigns for the purposes of guaranteeing the perpetuation of these child welfare fraud schemes, through the artificial use of an elected office.

Artificially using one's public office to solicit funds for personal inurement is not just a squander of public resources, it is repugnant to the ethical tenets of the common defense of the general welfare of the future of society, children.

Children are the posterity of this nation, yet, as a nation, we have sat back and watched our leaders allow child poverty to unprecedented levels of underdeveloped nations, but now we know why.

Selling chattel is the oldest form of survival based a perversion of the legal theory of "the best interests of the child" by furthering a compelling governmental interest.

These child welfare programs, typically religious-based, are nothing more than a few brochures, or, in this instance, a cool looking website featuring the classic cute lil' "at-risk" kids.

Happy Hearts Fund Child Welfare Fraud Scheme
The Happy Hearts Fund seems to be nothing more than an international money laundering organization for major corporations through tax aversive schemes.

The following is but one document secured from the hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) by Guccifer 2.0, who has stated that there is to be another document dump.


As one shall see, the Happy Hearts Fund contributed $500,000.00 to the Clinton Foundation by which the DNC administered the funds, more than likely into an independent SuperPAC, which would then be directly, secretly funneled into a candidate's political campaign, or, probably in this situation, was just never reported, as FEC fines are but a pittance to pay for failing to file quarterly and annual financial reports, if there was even a fine.
Political campaign committees are non-profits and have been operating under the schemes of privatization.

Privatization is currently being implemented as the "new public education model" and rewriting property law.

I will guarantee, unless there is a new form of oversight for non-profits in the U.S., chattel law will make a resurgence in the form of reaffirmations to promote the justification and perpetuation of the residuals of the "peculiar institution."

I may be wrong, but I doubt it because policy formation always begins with the best interests of the child and no one has yet to challenge me.



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

No comments: