The Suitors Cometh: Children's Health Defense v. Facebook - Removing The Iron Curtain Of The Child Welfare Industry

This is not about censorship.

This is about Public Private Partnerships and the generation of propaganda.

I see FCPA.

Then, the case is about the process of discovery, because, in discovery, we shall find the original source of all the funding, what they do with the funding, and who came up with the statements and challenges to the statements.

Here, Robert Kennedy, Jr. argues on behalf of the Children's Health Defense.

#maytheheavensfall

Children's Health Defense Legal Team Led by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Sues Facebook, "Fact-Checkers", Zuckerberg for Government-Sponsored Censorship, False Disparagement and Wire-Fraud


WASHINGTON, Aug. 18, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Children's Health Defense (CHD) filed a lawsuit on Monday in San Francisco Federal Court charging Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and three fact-checking companies with censoring truthful public health posts and fraudulently misrepresenting and defaming CHD. CHD, a non-profit watchdog group exposing wrongdoing and corruption in pharmaceutical and Telecom companies and public health agencies including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), has also sued the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for wireless health concerns.

Register for Online press conference with legal team and key witness: Wed., 8.19.20, 3:00 p.m. ET

In its Complaint, CHD alleges that Facebook has insidious conflicts with Pharmaceutical companies and their captive health regulators, and is invested in telecom and 5G. Facebook currently censors CHD's page, targeting its purge against factual information about vaccines and 5G.

Facebook acknowledges censorship coordination with WHO and CDC. While earlier court decisions have upheld Facebook's right to censor content, CHD argues that Facebook's pervasive Government collaboration makes its censorship a First Amendment violation. Facebook censorship began at the urging of Congressman Adam Schiff, who in March 2019 suggested Facebook suppress and purge content critical of government vaccine policies.

The lawsuit also challenges Facebook's use of so-called "independent fact-checkers"—who are neither independent nor fact-based—to create oppositional content on CHD's page, literally superimposed over CHD's original content. To further silence CHD's dissent against government policies and critique of Pharma, Facebook deactivated CHD's donate button and used deceptive technology (i.e. shadow banning) to minimize CHD's reach and visibility. In short, Facebook and the government colluded to silence CHD and its followers. Such tactics are fundamentally at odds with the First Amendment, which forbids Government from censoring private speech—particularly speech that criticizes Government policies or officials.

The court will decide whether Facebook's new Government-directed business model of false and misleading "warning labels," deceptive "fact-checks," and disabling a non-profit's donate button passes muster under the First and Fifth Amendments, the Lanham Act, and RICO. Those statutes protect CHD against online wire-fraud and false disparagement.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: "This is an important First Amendment case testing the boundaries of government authority to openly censor unwanted critiques of government policies and pharmaceutical and telecom products on privately owned internet platforms."

MEDIA CONTACT: Mary Holland 845-445-7807

Children's Health Defense v. Facebook Complaint Dkt 1-08-17 2020 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tales Of The New Crown: Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Through The Eyes Of Bill Gates

They test the vaccines on children of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth).

Gates Foundation Partners With The Clinton Foundation In Child Welfare Trust Fund Fraud

This is the direction of SCOTUS.

This is about the residuals of the peculiar institution, by procuring and purveying tiny humans, in the name of the lord, through their Public Private Partnerships, by stealin' the children, land & vote.

Gerrymandering.

Welcome to the world of Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare.

And no one will speak upon it, yet.

SCOTUS: The Very First Live Broadcast Of The Very First Time The World Witnesses The Dark Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution On Stealin' The Children, Land & Vote - Parental Rights

Listen to him talk about using the children as lab rats, and they die.

They run these tiny human testing with Medicaid, federal tax dollars. They buy and sell these kids for testing. It is horror and all the corporations have funding through their children's trust funds in these operations under the Vatican.

They snatch children from their mothers.

They make these zygotes in the lab.

And they do it in the name of god.

They force these mothers and girls into prostitution to snatch the babies to sell. It is called adoption. 

Refugee children come out these systems.

Foster children come out this system.

This is about Parental Rights because you do not have to worry about that pesky legal thing called consent.

These clinical trials are going on in Detroit.

Yet, no one cares, or do they, and are just terrified?

#maytheheavensfall

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Connecticut Gets Crafty In Its Asset Forfeiture RFRA Corporate Parental Rights Trafficking Tiny Humans Legislation - Happy Child Abuse Propaganda Month!

Boy, oh, boy!

Connecticut has been quite quiet lately, when it comes to child welfare, but now we know why!

It seems someone has gotten a hold of "The Elected Ones" over there in the Children's Committee to come up with another one of those crafty privatizational privateering of the children's trusts!

With this being a auspicious Child Abuse Propaganda Month, I thought it only befitting that I give you a throwback on Medicaid fraud in child welfare for the State.

I have always held, close to my heart, lots of fun questions surrounding the identities of these children, who will now have parental rights signed through a Psuedo Public Private Partnership using licensed nurses function as, well, I guess you can call creating a fake office of authority over the children's trust to testify, as to the authenticity of Medicaid fraud in child welfare?

See, I know they do it in Michigan, and I have found some really odd operations in Conneticuit child welfare NGOs having popped up, in times of discord, but I will not go there right now, for the timing of the national measles outbreak is just serendipitous to the events about to unfold.

If you have a situation where you have fake identities of children on paper, where all you need is someone with a nurses license to sign, en masse, like robo-signing property foreclosures or rubber stamping CPS child removal orders, you can bill Medicaid for lots and lots of vaccines for the kids, while implementing another crafty privateering revenue hustles to privatize the judicial system and continue their campaign, to swashbuckle those children's trusts.

I am waiting to see what they do in Michigan.

Connecticut Often Did Not C... by on Scribd

Bill That Reiterates Connecticut’s Religious Exemption to Vaccines Advances

Sen. Derek Slap and Rep. Liz Linehan
 co-chairs Children’s Committee

HARTFORD, CT — The Children’s Committee forwarded a bill to the House Tuesday that changes vaccine exemption forms to notify parents of the current law.

The bill had initially sought to remove school nurses as a person approved to witness a parent’s signature on a religious exemption form. That language was scrapped in favor of adding a disclaimer to the top of the form to let parents know a nurse has the right to refuse to witness their signature.

CLICK TO VOTE ON 2019 HB 7005: An Act Prohibiting The Acknowledgment Of Parental Statements Concerning Religious Objections To Vaccination By School Nurses And Permitting Members Of The Clergy To Acknowledge Such Statements

The bill squeaked through committee on a 8-6 vote. Three Democrats joined three Republicans in voting against the measure.

The new language would also require the Department of Education to send one written notice to each local and regional board of education and the Association of School Nurses of Connecticut a statement that says any school nurse can acknowledge or refuse to acknowledge a religious exemption.

Connecticut allows attorneys, judges, family support magistrates, town clerks, justices of the peace, and school nurses to sign the religious exemption forms.

“There are some nurses that have problems signing these papers and they have rights as well,” Sen. Christine Cohen, D-Guilford, said.

She said there are other people who can sign the form.

However, some parents objected to the legislation because not all the officials capable of signing the form also have to comply with health privacy laws under HIPAA.

Sen. Kevin Kelly, R-Shelton, said individuals have the right to privacy regarding their medical records.

He said the other individuals on the list are not bound by HIPAA like the school nurses. He said asking them to have others acknowledge their forms are “asking them to breach the privacy they have in their medical records.”

In 2015, the General Assembly passed a law that required parents to acknowledge their religious exemption annually. That was a year after one of the worst measles outbreaks in the U.S. following its elimination in 2000.

“This seems not to be a legislative issue. This seems to be an education issue,” Rep. Noreen Kokoruda, R-Madison, said. She said the legislation does nothing that isn’t already current law.

“Why would we need more legislation to educate people when it’s the law?” Kokoruda, who voted against the bill, said.

Rep. Gary Turco, D-Newington, said the best practices say vaccinations are very important to children’s well-being.

“We’re seeing cases across this country now where people aren’t vaccinating and there are serious consequences to that,” Turco said.

He said Connecticut allows for a religious exemption and there’s nothing in this legislation that changes that.

Rep. Noreen Kokoruda, R-Madison,
with the face of 

Rep. Patricia Wilson Pheanious, D-Ashford, who also voted against the bill, said the nurses are only being asked to acknowledge the signature of the parent.

“They’re not being asked to make a judgment,” Wilson Pheanious said.

Sen. Derek Slap, D-West Hartford, said he knows they’ve been getting a lot of emails from constituents on both sides of the issue and one of the arguments against the bill is the “slippery slope” argument.

“This is not getting rid of a religious exemption,” Slap reiterated. “This is not putting another obstacle in the way of parents claiming a religious exemption. This is simply restating what current statute already says.”

Those who oppose vaccinating their children for religious reasons believe the bill could be used as a vehicle to eliminate the religious exemption to vaccines.

Kokoruda said parents have every reason to be concerned that the bill could be used to eliminate their religious exemption. She said legislation intending to do one thing becomes something else all the time.

“It’s the nose under the carpet,” Kokoruda said. “...I just think this is the first step toward totally getting rid of religious exemptions.”

Rep. Liz Linehan, D-Cheshire, said she’s given everyone her word that she has no intention of using this bill a vehicle for getting rid of religious exemptions.

Linehan said she would like to eliminate the religious exemption, but will use another piece of legislation to accomplish it.

“I’ve made it very clear that I’m 100 percent for getting rid of the religious exemption, but you have my word that this bill is not the vehicle,” Linehan added.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

LK Report for 8/16/17 - Suing CPS and More...

Here are today's headlines.  

Check back later.  You never know when I might update this post.

http://www.LegallyKidnapped.com

---

LINCOLN, Neb. - Four reports from Omaha and one from Holdrege have been received regarding a woman posing as a child protective services employee seeking admission into homes, the Department of Health and Human Services said. More >> Woman posing as Child Protective Services worker tries to enter homes -------------------- While she sought custody of her newborn son during her treatment for methamphetamine addiction and mental health counseling, she got to raise him herself. More >> Can giving babies back sooner to parents in drug treatment be best? A court is trying it. ---------------------- As the nation's opioid crisis has deepened, the number of drug treatment centers for pregnant women has grown. But experts and advocates say there aren't enough services for pregnant women to meet the demand, and many don't offer the drugs doctors would normally use to treat addiction because they are concerned about the effects they might have on a fetus. And some laws requiring that babies going through withdrawal be removed from their mother's care can be a deterrent to seeking help, they said. More >> Pregnant women addicted to opioids face tough choices -------------------- A SOCIAL worker has been struck off after he allegedly told a highly vulnerable child to self harm. David Steare was alleged to have told the youngster to ‘only cut’ herself on alternate days at set times, with her mother there to treat her wounds. More >> Social worker struck off after allegedly telling vulnerable child to self-harm --------------------- South Africa’s child protection system is failing its children‚ says World Vision South Africa. “Despite comprehensive law and policy regulations‚ the lack of inter-sectoral collaboration has led to very low cross-referrals between social services and the SAPS‚” the humanitarian and child advocacy organisation said on Wednesday. More >> SA child protection system failing its children – World Vision SA ---------------------- Raising the minimum wage by $1 per hour would result in a substantial decrease in the number of reported cases of child neglect, according to a new study co-authored by an Indiana University researcher. More >> Raising the minimum wage would reduce child neglect cases ----------------------- DES MOINES, IOWA  --  Iowa jurors awarded Heidi and Rachel McFarland $3.25 million, saying they believe Des Moines adoption attorney Jason Reiper failed to file crucial adoption paperwork in a timely fashion, which ultimately led to the loss of their child. More >> Ankeny Couple Awarded Millions in Adoption Malpractice Lawsuit ------------------------ ASHLEY — A local mother filed a federal lawsuit Monday alleging Luzerne County Children and Youth Services put her two children into a home where they were physically and sexually abused by an adopted child. More >> Woman says CYS put her children in abusive home

-------------------------

A 19-year-old who says she suffered years of abuse at the hands of her adoptive mother filed a lawsuit Tuesday alleging assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress and outrageous conduct.

More >> Iowa teen files civil suit against mother convicted of abuse
----------------------

TOPEKA (TNS) — Kansas is asking that reports of child abuse and neglect be made by phone for now because of computer problems.

More >> DCF taking reports by phone due to computer issues
-----------------------

The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the state's child welfare agency cannot vaccinate children placed temporarily in its custody when the parents object.

More >> Court: State can't vaccinate kids in temporary custody

• Conn. Supreme Court: DCF Can't Mandate Vaccinations Over Parental Rights

------------------------

The British Columbia Court of Appeal has determined that a child’s Indigenous heritage does not attract a “super-weight” over other factors in adoption in a decision the birth mother plans to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

More >> B.C. court rules Indigenous heritage doesn’t override child’s best interest in adoption
-------------------------

Red Hot Chili Peppers' Flea holds a very strong opinion in regards to removing music education from schools. The bassist sat down with Rolling Stone to give his thoughts on politicians looking to cut funding for such programs, stating: "It's child abuse. It's just plain wrong."

More >> RHCP’s Flea says removing music education from schools is “child abuse”

---------------------------

A SENIOR Catholic priest has argued lifting the seal of confession and forcing clergy to report admissions of child sex abuse would make children more vulnerable.

More >> Senior priest claims breaking confessional seal could make children more vulnerable

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Penn and Teller on Vaccinations

Get vaccinated or CPS will do it for you.
 
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Pharmaceutical company ethics: Protected by the White House, the FDA and Congress

OCTOBER 18, 2010

by Harold

Brasscheck TV

10/18/2010

Brasscheck is paying a lot of attention to vaccines lately.

Why?

Because the US Supreme Court is currently hearing a major vaccination case.

Meanwhile, the US news media is providing no relevant context about the issue for people who want to follow the story in an informed way.

The scant info the media does provide is heavily biased and outright distorted in order to put the pharmaceutical industry in a good light.

Here’s the real story about ethics of these companies and the people who control them.

And this applies to ALL their products…not just vaccinations.

SCOTUS Considers Immunity For Big Pharma

Supreme Court considers consequences in vaccine case

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case Tuesday that could pave the way for numerous lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers, a particularly high-stakes issue in light of the thousands of claims, so far unproven scientifically, linking vaccines to autism.

In the case before the high court, the parents of an 18-year-old woman who suffers from severe developmental disabilities want to sue a vaccine manufacturer and argue broad legal immunity for such companies shouldn't apply in this case.

They challenged a 1986 federal law that says vaccine manufacturers can't be sued "if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings."

Much of Tuesday's arguments focused on the meaning of the word "unavoidable" in the context of the law.

Attorneys for the parents of Hannah Bruesewitz said the adverse effects she suffered could have been avoided because the company, Pfizer Inc.'s Wyeth, had a safer vaccine available when she was immunized in 1991.

Attorneys for Wyeth dispute that a safer alternative existed.

Several justices said the Bruesewitzes' argument that the side effects were avoidable because a safer vaccine could have been used was problematic.

Justice Antonin Scalia said that allowing people to sue vaccine manufacturers on the basis that another company makes a safer vaccine could lead to manufacturers removing potentially harmful ingredients, which would make vaccines safer, but far less effective.

"As has been said, the government interprets 'unavoidable' to mean unavoidable with respect to the vaccine that has been approved," Justice Scalia said. "If it doesn't mean that, if it simply means unavoidable with some other vaccine, you could always avoid them if you have a vaccine that is significantly less effective."

But other justices, such as Justice Sonia Sotomayor, expressed concerns that the immunity vaccine manufacturers have provides no motivation for them to improve vaccines and make them safer. She also didn't seem to buy the arguments that allowing certain cases to go to court would cripple the vaccine-manufacturing industry.

Story Continues →

U.S.Court of Federal Claims for Damages in Vaccinations Causing Autism

Feds Award Damages For Vaccinations Causing Autism

Despite a multi-million dollar court ruling awarding damages to children who became autistic after being vaccinated, CNN comes out with contradictory information.

Exposing a fetus or young infant to vaccines with the mercury-based preservative called thimerosal does not increase the risk for autism, according to a study published Monday in the journal Pediatrics.

"This study adds to the evidence that thimerosal-containing vaccines do not increase a child's risk of developing autism," lead study author, Dr. Frank DeStefano of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tells CNN.

Hey CNN, why don't you find out which pharmaceutical corporation financed the study and when are you going to acknowledge Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare???

Call me.

U.S.Court of Federal Claims for Damages in Vacinations Causing Autism