Friday, November 16, 2018

Former Pfizer Executive Of HHS Beats Himself To Death

I just found it quite odd that one would choose his method of suicide to be beating himself up with a blunt object with the medical examiner concurring.

He was an executive at Pfzier.

But, hey, what do I know? 

I know HHS should be in shambles, due to all the Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare.

Wikileaks Exposes Drugging Kids as Lab Rats

Death of HHS official Daniel Best is ruled a suicide


Daniel Best, a pharmaceutical executive from Bay Village who was tapped to oversee government efforts to reduce prescription drug costs, died on Nov. 1.
Daniel Best was an executive at Pfizer
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Nov. 1 death of Daniel Best, a pharmaceutical executive from Bay Village who led U.S. Department of Health and Human Services efforts to lower prescription drug prices, has been ruled a suicide, officials in Washington, D.C., said Thursday.

Police say Best was found "unresponsive" near the garage door exit of an apartment building in Washington, D.C.'s Navy Yard neighborhood at 5:25 a.m. on Nov. 1, and was pronounced dead by medical personnel who responded to the scene.

The city's Office of the Chief Medical Examiner on Thursday said Best died from "multiple blunt force injuries" and it ruled his death a suicide. It would not release further information.

In announcing his death, HHS Secretary Alex Azar said the 49-year-old former CVSHealth and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals executive agreed to work at HHS "out of a desire to serve the American people by making health care more affordable."

"He brought his deep expertise and passion to this task with great humility and collegiality," Azar's statement said. "All of us who served with Dan at HHS and in the administration mourn his passing and extend our thoughts and prayers to his wife Lisa and the entire Best family at this difficult time."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

DOJ First Historic Conviction Of Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Funding Political Campaigns

The case was investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation, the FBI, and the Offices of the Inspectors General from the Departments of Justice, Labor, Veterans Affairs, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).  This is a combined investigation with the Western District of Arkansas, the Eastern District of Arkansas and the Public Integrity Section of the Department of Justice.  This case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Marco A. Palmieri of the Public Integrity Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Steven M. Mohlhenrichof the Western District of Missouri.

I humbly bow, to each and everyone of you.

Much love.

Alrighty, back to work.

Vite, vite.

On a mission...


Former Charity CEO Pleads Guilty To Multi-Million-Dollar Political Corruption Scheme



The former CEO of a charity headquartered in Springfield, Missouri has pleaded guilty to her role in a multi-million-dollar political corruption scheme that involved bribes and campaign contributions for elected public officials in Missouri and Arkansas, announced Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Tim Garrison of the Western District of Missouri.
Marilyn Luann Nolan, 68, of Springfield, pleaded guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge David P. Rush on Friday, Nov. 9, to one count of conspiracy to embezzle and misapply the funds of a charitable organization that received federal funds.
By pleading guilty, Nolan admitted that she conspired with others from 2008 to June 30, 2017, to misapply millions of dollars of the charity’s funds for substantial, undisclosed payments to lobbying firms and political advocates, monetary and in-kind contributions to the campaigns of candidates for public office, and to bribe public officials.  Nolan also admitted that she knew her co-conspirators defrauded the charity in order to enrich themselves, and her.
Nolan began working at Alternative Opportunities Inc., in 1992.  In 2015, that company merged with Preferred Family Healthcare Inc., after which it continued to be known as Preferred Family Healthcare.  Nolan was the chief executive officer and oversaw the charity’s lobbying and governmental affairs activities.
Preferred Family Healthcare and its subsidiaries provided a variety of services to individuals in Missouri, Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma and Illinois, including mental and behavioral health treatment and counseling, substance abuse treatment and counseling, employment assistance, aid to individuals with developmental disabilities and medical services.

Political Advocacy, Campaign Contributions, Fund-Raising Events
According to the plea agreement, Nolan and her conspirators caused the charity to misapply its funds to pay for political advocacy, including lobbying, that violated both IRS rules governing tax-exempt organizations, and federal laws and regulations governing recipients of federal grants and contracts.  Nolan admitted that she directed and assisted her co-conspirators to direct millions of dollars to lobbyists, including Donald Andrew Jones and Milton Russell Cranford, who previously entered pleas of guilty to federal crimes in related cases.  Nolan also directly lobbied legislators.
Under her plea agreement, Nolan also admitted that she and her conspirators:
  • Caused the charity to contribute financially to the campaigns of candidates for public office through “straw donors,” including the charity’s lobbyists, who were also reimbursed by way of invoices that were falsely described as “training” and “consulting” expenses;
  • Encouraged charity employees to contribute to candidates for public office and caused the charity to reimburse them for those contributions by providing funds falsely described as reimbursement for travel or other expenses the employees had not actually incurred; and
  • Caused the charity to provide in-kind contributions to the campaigns of candidates for public office, including in Missouri where they organized fundraisers for several candidates running for seats in the Missouri State Senate, Missouri House of Representatives, and the Greene County Commission and in Arkansas, where Nolan and her conspirators organized fundraisers (often at hotels or restaurants) for many candidates running for seats in the Arkansas State Senate and Arkansas House of Representatives.
Nolan also admitted as part of her plea to directing an employee to use the charity’s resources to arrange for catering, liquor, decorations, and other food connected to political fundraisers.  This employee used a charity-issued corporate credit card for the purchases, with Nolan’s knowledge.
At all times relevant to Nolan’s plea, the charity was absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for elective public office.  Contributions to political campaign funds violated this prohibition, and could have resulted in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.

Bribery of Elected Public Officials
According to the plea agreement, Nolan and her conspirators misapplied some of the charity’s funds to bribe elected public officials in the following manners:
  • They gave things of value to numerous public officials, in exchange for their official actions benefitting the charity and themselves personally, including cash, travel and entertainment, premium tickets to sporting events, hotel accommodations, and use of the charity’s luxury/recreational real estate;
  • They hired public officials and the family members of public officials as charity employees; and
  • Nolan and the conspirators disguised bribes as contract payments for things such as consulting, training, and legal services.
The government believes the schemes Nolan pleaded guilty to totaled approximately $6 million.  The parties reserved the right in the plea agreement to litigate the exact amount of that loss, for the purpose of computing the federal sentencing guidelines.

Charity Embezzlement
As part of her plea agreement, Nolan also admitted that over an approximately 12-year period from 2005 to 2017, certain charity executives embezzled millions of dollars from the charity, from which Nolan profited.  Nolan admitted that although she did not know the full details of the many embezzlement and misapplication of funds schemes, she knew at the time that the charity bore additional costs from many of those transactions, and willfully blinded herself regarding the details of her conspirators’ schemes and artifices to defraud the charity.
One example referenced in Nolan’s plea agreement consisted of the formation of an LLC that was used as the management company for Alternative Opportunities, identified in court documents as Entity A.  In 2006, Entity A was sold to a publicly-traded corporation identified in court documents as Company A, which was also partly owned by Nolan.  Nolan admitted that this sale was perpetrated for the primary purpose of enriching charity executives, including herself.  Nolan’s share of the proceeds from the sale of Entity A to Company A was $3,769,536.
Nolan further admitted as part of her plea that she also received $361,574 from two LLCs identified as Entity B and Entity C where, immediately prior to the 2006 sale of Entity A to Company A, Entity B acquired title to all real estate formerly held by Entity A and Entity C held the title to the corporation’s headquarters building in Springfield, and duplex homes located in Springfield.
Under the terms of Friday’s plea agreement, Nolan must pay $4,131,111 in restitution to the government, less a credit for taxes she paid on the funds received.
A sentencing hearing will be scheduled after the completion of a presentence investigation by the U.S. Probation Office.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

What Do Detroit & Broward County Have In Common? Private Contracts & Election Irregularities

FUN FACT! CITY OF DETROIT ELECTIONS DIVISION HIRES TEMPORARY PRIVATE CONTRACTORS WHO DO NOT TAKE OATHS OF OFFICE

P.I.E. Management, L.L.C. has privately contracted with the City of Detroit Elections Division, just like KForce, as identified in the Affidavit, below.

Oddly enough, KForce is in Michigan.

https://cofs.lara.state.mi.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSearchResults.aspx

But hey, what do I know?

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: Wayne County 2018 Election - DOJ Has This Race

Image result for kentucky derby mint julep watching race hat
"Hold on, DOJ has this race."
The Michigan 2018 Primary Elections for Wayne County have yet to be certified by the Secretary of State Board of Canvassers.

https://mielections.us/election/results/2018PRI_CENR.html

The best part of all of this is that not one candidate who has been elected has dared to raise this fact in public.

Voting Rights will be with you, shortly.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Facebook Is Having Election Interference Issues

Funny thing.

Facebook, Google and Twitter all testified in House Judiciary hearings that they do not censor conservative speech, but, oddly enough, they suppressed my blog, and everything to do with Judiciary and the former Ranking Member, who is not aligned with conservative speech.

Conflicting reports of a Facebook executive's firing fan the flames of an anti-conservative debate in Silicon Valley



  • In recent months, Facebook, Google and Twitter have faced intensifying claims of online censorship and an environment that's not welcoming to right-leaning employees.
  • A Wall Street Journal report claims Oculus co-founder Palmer Luckey's activity on a polarizing, and often extreme, right-leaning Reddit channel caused an uproar among Facebook employees. It also says the company pressured Luckey to write in an internal email that he supported libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson instead of Donald Trump.
  • Facebook and its executives have repeatedly said Luckey's firing was not the result of his political views.


  • Silicon Valley is battling a new report of anti-conservative culture, fanning the flames of an already-intensifying debate.
    Palmer LuckeyA weekend report by The Wall Street Journal on the 2017 firing of Facebook executive Palmer Luckey claims the Oculus co-founder was forced out for factors relating to his political leanings and online support for Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election.

    Facebook and its executives have repeatedly said Luckey's firing was not the result of his political views. CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified as much before Congress in April, and vice president of AR/VR at Facebook, Andrew Bosworth, said on Twitter late Sunday, "Any claims that his departure was do to his conservative beliefs are false."
    A Facebook spokesperson told CNBC on Monday, "We can say unequivocally that Palmer's departure was not due to his political views."

    The conflicting reports could add to existing concerns of anti-conservative bias among tech companies. In recent months, Facebook, Google and Twitter have all faced intensifying claims of online censorship and an environment that's not welcoming to right-leaning employees.
    The Journal report claims Luckey's activity on a polarizing, and often extreme, right-leaning Reddit channel caused an uproar among Facebook employees. It also says the company pressured Luckey to write in an internal email that he supported libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson, instead of Trump.

    "We always made it clear that any mention of politics was up to Palmer and we did not pressure him to say something that wasn't factual or true," a Facebook spokesperson told CNBC.

    Facebook executives have said they're limited in what they can say about Luckey's departure, since it deals with confidential personnel matters. Luckey, who received a $100 million payout, according to the Journal, told CNBC last month it wasn't his choice to leave Facebook.

    Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

    Monday, November 12, 2018

    Another Manafort Related Real Estate Bankruptcy Mortgage Fraud Scheme

    Please keep in mind that this is only one type of real estate scheme, but they run them all the time, even in Detroit.

    Paul Manafort's ex-son-in-law Yohai charged with another real estate scam in LA

    Jeffrey Yohai in New York in January 2015
    Jeffrey Yohai

    LOS ANGELES — Federal prosecutors allege Paul Manafort's former son-in-law engaged in wire fraud and identity theft during a high-end, Los Angeles-area real estate scam while out on bond awaiting sentencing for different , according to a criminal complaint unsealed Wednesday.

    The LAPD arrested Jeffrey Yohai, a real estate developer who did deals with Manafort, a week ago on suspicion of fraud and turned him over to federal officials Wednesday morning.

    He is expected to make his initial appearance on the new charges Wednesday afternoon.

    The FBI says that Yohai had been hard to find because over the past several months he's driven two different Rolls Royces, a Porsche Panamera, a Cadillac Escalade, and a Range Rover — all likely rented, the bureau says in court documents, in an effort to avoid detection.

    Yohai, who divorced Jessica Manafort in August 2017, was previously charged by federal prosecutors with conspiracy to commit bank and aggravated identity theft after defaulting on $15 million in real estate loans.

    In February 2018, Yohai pleaded guilty to misusing construction loan funds and another charge. His sentencing was continued to Jan. 18, 2019.

    According to the complaint in the original case, in 2015 and 2016 Yohai obtained $15 million in loans to purchase and rehabilitate three properties in the Hollywood Hills, then defaulted on the loans.

    Federal prosecutors now say his modus operandi in his "new crimes" is "strikingly like" that of his original federal offenses, and "involves some of the same participants."

    While Yohai was out on bond awaiting sentencing for his original offenses, say prosecutors, he and alleged co-conspirators would trick lenders into providing millions of loans based on false and inflated property appraisals of luxury homes that they did not own. They would then promise the actual owners of the luxury homes that they would secure wealthy short-term renters for their properties.

    According to the 43-page complaint filed Oct. 17 in the Central District of California, Yohai would then use the money to pay pre-existing debts or personal expenses.

    While he was collecting rent from tenants, including an unidentified NBA basketball player who paid $50,000 in rent for two months, prosecutors say Yohai kept the scam going by supplying the real owners of the properties with worthless checks and falsified wire transfer records.

    If the victim demanded repayment, Yohai would often buy time by sending checks written on accounts with insufficient funds. When those checks bounced, according to the complaint, Yohai would assert he wired the money back to the victim and send fake wire transfer documentation, "insisting that there must be some banking mistake to explain why the funds never arrive."

    The complaint alleges Yohai made false statements to investors during a lunch to the effect that "he 'turned state's evidence' on … Manafort" and "that he had to go to 'D.C.'" to meet with staff from special counsel Robert Mueller's office or "downtown" to meet with "the feds." But the complaint does not specify whether Yohai ever met with any members of Mueller's team, and makes no further mention of the special counsel, whose investigation led to his ex-father-in-law's conviction and guilty pleas on multiple criminal counts.

    Federal prosecutors in California and the special counsel have looked into Manafort's business deals with Yohai, who was Manafort's partner in four California property deals that failed and were placed in bankruptcy. Manafort's holding company, MC Brooklyn Holdings, also bought a brownstone in Brooklyn, New York, in December 2012 for $2,995,000 that was brokered by Yohai, real estate postings online show.

    Manafort pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with Mueller shortly before the start of his second trial in mid-September. The Brooklyn home is one of several properties that Manafort agreed to forfeit as a result of his plea agreement.

    Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

    Cocktails & Popcorn: Impeachment Recipe For Removal From Office For Stealin'

    Sweet Tea Sangria Recipe
    750-ml. bottle white wine, such as Sauvignon Blanc
    sweet tea
    1/4 c. 
    triple sec
    2 c. 
    sliced frozen peaches
    raspberries
    Fresh mint, for garnish
    It seems we have ourselves an impeachment model being executed.

    This elected official impeachment model was constructed by mixing the right ingredients of federal jurisdiction and the state constitution, with a sprig of resignation.

    It started in Detroit.

    A peachy delight!

    Special session canceled after West Virginia justice resigns

    CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — The resignation of a West Virginia Supreme Court justice recently convicted of federal charges prompted the governor Sunday to cancel a special legislative session that was to consider the justice's removal.

    It was the latest development in an impeachment scandal miring some past and present justices in varying accusations including abuse of authority and failure to rein in excessive spending that engulfed the state's highest court for months.

    Republican Gov. Jim Juestice's office said late Saturday he received a letter from Justice Allen Loughry and accepted his resignation effective at the close of business Monday. Justice had no further comment and Loughry's one-sentence resignation letter didn't elaborate.

    Loughry was convicted last month of federal criminal charges including wire fraud involving his personal use of state cars and fuel cards and mail fraud. He has requested a new trial.

    Last week Justice had called the special session for Tuesday, saying in a proclamation that it would consider removing Loughry from his post. Another proclamation Sunday canceled the special session in light of Loughry's resignation.

    Loughry couldn't be reached for comment. His attorney, John A. Carr, said in an email he would have no comment.

    Loughry and three other justices were impeached by the West Virginia House in August over questions involving lavish office renovations that evolved into varying accusations of corruption, incompetence and neglect of duty. One of them, Justice Beth Walker, was cleared of an impeachment charge at a Senate trial last month.

    The West Virginia Supreme Court last month effectively halted the Legislature's remaining efforts to impeach the state's justices as a violation of the separate of power doctrine. The court ruled that the Senate lacks jurisdiction to pursue its impeachment trial of Justice Margaret Workman.

    The Senate had postponed Workman's trial after the presiding judge didn't show up following the court ruling. A panel of acting justices said the court's decision to stop Workman's impeachment hearing also applies to retired Justice Robin Davis and Loughry, who had petitioned the court to intervene.

    Senate President Mitch Carmichael, a Republican, lauded the resignation announcement Saturday.
    "We appreciate that Justice Loughry has decided to do the right thing and step down from the Court," Carmichael said in a statement.

    Judicial elections in West Virginia became nonpartisan in 2016, but the court's impeachment scandal this year stirred political attacks. Some Democrats argued that the court's shakeup over spending and other issues was a power grab by the Republican-led legislature.

    On Election Day, two state Supreme Court justices appointed to the court after the scandal broke won election to continue on the bench: Former House speaker Tim Armstead and ex-Congressman Evan Jenkins won those races Tuesday night, each defeating nine other candidates. They had originally been appointed by Justice to fill two of the seats on the state's highest court pending the midterm election.

    Armstead will complete the term of Justice Menis Ketchum, who announced his resignation on the eve of the House's impeachment proceedings. The term runs through 2020.

    Jenkins will serve until 2024, when the term of retired Justice Robin Davis ends. Davis also was impeached.

    Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

    Cocktails & Popcorn: Marc Elias Is Coming In For A Landing In Detroit, Right After Broward County Election Recount

    Previously, on Cocktails & Popcorn, Florida Broward County had some issues with voter ballots and its clerk where the call was put out to remove the County Clerk from office, immediately, and put the office in federal receivership, exactly like they do in child abuse and neglect cases.

    Something tells me the same thing is about to happen to Detroit, but, hey, what do I know?

    Back to Florida.

    FLORIDA’S RECOUNT BEGINS AMID ALLEGATIONS OFFICIALS TAMPERED WITH BALLOTS

    Then, this happened.
    Then, this happened.
    Then, this happened.

    It dawned on me that Marc Elias, "Legal Genius" (trademark pending) of Perkins Coie Sucks is about to deal with his own election interference Office of the Special Prosecutor indictment in Detroit, so I thought it best not to tell his tale, because that would just ruin another cocktails & popcorn moment.

    Stay tuned and get more popcorn.

    We are coming in for a landing in Detroit.



    #perkinscoiesucks

    Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

    Sunday, November 11, 2018

    CONYERS Voting Rights Report Removed From Library Of Congress: Preserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio - Status Report of the House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff - 2004

    Well, it seems that this federal document has been removed from the Library of Congress.

    https://www.loc.gov/item/2009284117/

    About this Item

    Title
    What went wrong in Ohio : the Conyers report on the 2004 presidential election /
    Summary
    Report of an investigation into irregularities reported in the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio, compiled by the Democratic staff of the House Judiciary Committee.
    Contributor Names
    United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary.
    Created / Published
    Chicago : Academy Chicago Publishers, c2005.
    Subject Headings
    -  Contested elections--Ohio
    -  Minorities--Suffrage--Ohio
    -  Presidents--United States--Election--2004
    -  Elections--Ohio--Management
    Notes
    -  Includes bibliographical references (p. 117-142).
    Medium
    xii, 142 p. ; 22 cm.
    Call Number/Physical Location
    JK526 2004 .U55 2005
    Digital Id
    http://www.house.gov/judiciary%5Fdemocrats/ohiostatusrept1505.pdf
    Library of Congress Control Number
    2009284117
    Description
    Report of an investigation into irregularities reported in the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio, compiled by the Democratic staff of the House Judiciary Committee.
    LCCN Permalink
    https://lccn.loc.gov/2009284117
    Additional Metadata Formats
    MARCXML Record
    MODS Record
    Dublin Core Record

    But, have no fear, I found it, below, and it was not found in any U.S. governmental archive.

    Now, why would someone allow such a prescient, historic report on voting irregularities be removed from the National Archives?

    Perhaps, it was to seize the assets of the civil rights legacy.

    But, hey, what do I know?

    I know the U.S. Department of Justice should look into this.

    Congress can not obviate if there is no precedent.

    For your generalizable pleasure, we can now statistically reconstruct these investigations using databases, for external validity in the courts, of course.

    Executive Summary

    Representative John Conyers, Jr., the Ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, asked
    the Democratic staff to conduct an investigation into irregularities reported in the Ohio presidential election and to prepare a Status Report concerning the same prior to the Joint Meeting of Congress scheduled for January 6, 2005, to receive and consider the votes of the electoral college for president. The following Report includes a brief chronology of the events; summarizes the relevant background law; provides detailed findings (including factual findings and legal analysis); and describes various recommendations for acting on this Report going forward.

    We have found numerous, serious election irregularities in the Ohio presidential election, which resulted in a significant disenfranchisement of voters. Cumulatively, these irregularities, which affected hundreds of thousand of votes and voters in Ohio, raise grave doubts regarding whether it can be said the Ohio electors selected on December 13, 2004, were chosen in a manner that conforms to Ohio law, let alone federal requirements and constitutional standards.

    This report, therefore, makes three recommendations: (1) consistent with the requirements of the United States Constitution concerning the counting of electoral votes by Congress and Federal law implementing these requirements, there are ample grounds for challenging the electors from the State of Ohio; (2) Congress should engage in further hearings into the widespread irregularities reported in Ohio; we believe the problems are serious enough to warrant the appointment of a joint select Committee of the House and Senate to investigate and report back to the Members; and (3) Congress needs to enact election reform to restore our people’s trust in our democracy. These changes should include putting in place more specific federal protections for federal elections, particularly in the areas of audit capability for electronic voting machines and casting and counting of provisional ballots, as well as other needed changes to federal and state election laws.
    Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

    Friday, November 9, 2018

    Happy National Adoption Month: SCOTUS - DHS v. States Children's Trust Funds On Trafficking Tiny Humans - DACA, DAPA Privatization Policies Of Fraud

    Children's Trust Funds is the reason why we are in SCOTUS.

    The link, below, is the first Petition for Certiorari, and a bit of history, in dealing with the chattel law in the trafficking of tiny humans under DACA and DAPA for National Adoption Month.


    Happy National Adoption Month: TRUMP v. NAACP Petition For Certiorari To SCOTUS On Trafficking Tiny Humans - DACA, DAPA


    In short, DACA and DAPA are policies, not laws, because the Congress refuses to make law in dealing with child immigration.

    The reason why the Congress will not touch the fraud in child welfare is because it is what keeps them in a job.


    That is why you have the States jumping to defend DACA because it is their money maker through the Public Private Partnerships o Children's Trust Funds:

    QUESTIONS PRESENTED 
    This dispute concerns the policy of immigration enforcement discretion known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). In 2016, this Court affirmed, by an equally divided Court, a decision of the Fifth Circuit holding that two related Department of Homeland Security (DHS) discretionary enforcement policies, including an expansion of the DACA policy, were likely unlawful and should be enjoined. See United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (per curiam). In September 2017, DHS determined that the original DACA policy was unlawful and would likely be struck down by the courts on the same grounds as the related policies. DHS thus instituted an orderly wind-down of the DACA policy. The questions presented are as follows: 1. Whether DHS’s decision to wind down the DACA policy is judicially reviewable. 2. Whether DHS’s decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful.

    PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING 
    Petitioners are the Donald J. Trump, President of the United States; Jefferson B. Sessions III, Attorney General of the United States; Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; and the United States.
    Respondents are the Regents of the University of California; Janet Napolitano, President of the University of California; the State of California; the State of Maine; the State of Maryland; the State of Minnesota; the City of San Jose; Dulce Garcia; Miriam Gonzalez Avila; Saul Jimenez Suarez; Viridiana Chabolla Mendoza; Norma Ramirez; Jirayut Latthivongskorn; the County of Santa Clara; and Service Employees International Union Local 521.
    And, in the Vidal, et. al. case, you have:
    Respondents are Martin Jonathan Batalla Vidal, Antonio Alarcon, Eliana Fernandez, Carlos Vargas, Mariano Mondragon, and Carolina Fung Feng, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals; Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals; the State of New York; the State of Massachusetts; the State of Washington; the State of Connecticut; the State of Delaware; the District of Columbia; the State of Hawaii; the State of Illinois; the State of Iowa; the State of New Mexico; the State of North Carolina; the State of Oregon; the State of Pennsylvania; the State of Rhode Island; the State of Vermont; the State of Virginia; and the State of Colorado. 
    I have included the petition for cert of the individual DREAMer defendants, below.

    If you pay close attention to what I am saying, here, you will start to see a civil rights model.

    No? You can not see the civil rights model?

    Image result for brown v board of education
    https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2017/10
    /a-letter-to-kansas-foster-care-task.html
    Brown v. Board of Education.

    In a nutshell, Brown v. Board of Education is child welfare legal precedent because it was the very first case that was based in what they called "science" back then.

    The SCOTUS case was fast tracked by enjoining all parties into on case for orals and opinion.

    I ran across a study that was actually used in one of the many enjoined cases in this action that came out of Kansas called Brown v. Board of Education.

    Yes, I was intentionally redundant in my cadence, of saying Brown v. Board of Education came out of Kansas.

    Do you know why?

    Because, the chattel model was created, right here, in Michigan called the Michigan Children's Trust Fund and the model transposed to Kansas to set up the parent trust fund.

    The National Alliance of Children’s Trust and Prevention Funds (Alliance) is the only national membership organization representing state children’s trust and prevention funds (CTFs).

    Dr. Ray E. Helfer, M.D., began using his influence to create a protected source of funding for prevention by persuading the state legislature in Michigan to increase funding to add 50 full-time “prevention workers” to the protective services budget. After the “prevention worker” positions had been created and filled, all 50 had full-time protective service caseload and none of them was doing any prevention work. The needs and demands of children in crisis had compelled the decision makers to divert the money to treatment. This event helped shape the law that created Michigan’s Children’s Trust Fund and served as a model for all states.



    In summation, DACA is nothing but a product of judicial lobbying of legislating from the bench through privatization under UCC laws as foreign corporations to fund political campaigns, to ensure more trafficking of tiny human policies go through so there is more appropriation of federal funding to secure more foreign contracts designed to traffic more tiny humans for the continuance of stealin' children, land and votes.

    This is the reason why Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare is going to SCOTUS.


    It all started in Detroit.

    It all started with the children because no one cares and there are too many trillions of dollars involved.

    Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

    What Do Wayne County & Broward County Have In Common?

    Q: What do Wayne County, Michigan and Broward County, Florida have in common?

    A: A County Election Commission DOJ Voting Rights Task Force investigation!

    That is correct, the 2018 Primary Election Results for both states have yet to be certified.

    FUN FACT! DETROIT CITY COUNCILWOMAN BRENDA JONES SAT ON THE CITY OF DETROIT ELECTIONS COMMITTEE FOR 2016 & 2018!

    I wonder if Marc is going to have time in his busy schedule, shuttling between Detroit and D.C., to properly handle this Florida case.

    Everywhere in Wayne County there seems to be an issue with these absentee ballots.



    RUBIO WARNS: DEMS ARE ACTIVELY TRYING TO STEAL THE FLORIDA ELECTION


    Florida’s Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes, head of Broward County’s election board, has repeatedly been accused of misconduct.

    The Florida governor and Senate races could lie in her hands. A lawyer tied to the Democratic National Committee and Fusion GPS, the group behind the Steele dossier, has now gotten involved in a recount effort. Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said Democrats are trying to “change the results” of the election, and a liberal said Snipes belongs in prison.

    Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio is warning that the fate of his state’s governorship could hang in the hands of Florida’s Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes, whom he’s called incompetent for violating state and federal laws. A liberal candidate similarly painted her as incompetent and corrupt.

    Democratic gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum initially conceded the Florida race to Republican Ron DeSantis, but backtracked after vote totals changed Thursday, narrowing the gap to less than half a percent in both the gubernatorial and senatorial races.

    Broward County is often the slowest of the state’s 67 counties to count votes, and its election department has repeatedly been faulted for wrongdoing.

    Now, Perkins Coie lawyer Marc Elias has been enlisted in a recount effort. Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson is retaining Elias, who said it’s “not plausible” that, as Broward statistics suggest, 14,000 people voted in sometimes-obscure state-level races but left the Senate one blank. Republican Gov. Rick Scott, who, by initial appearances, beat Nelson in a race for Senate, said Elias will use aggressive techniques to “steal” the election.

    Elias worked for both the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC during the 2016 election, even before the 2016 presidential candidate became the Democratic nominee, when the two were supposed to be independent. Perkins Coie also hired Fusion GPS during that election to investigate then-candidate Donald Trump, which ultimately resulted in an unverified dossier being sent to the FBI. “Democrat lawyers are descending on Florida,” Rubio tweeted Thursday. “They have been very clear they aren’t here to make sure every vote is counted. They are here to change the results of election; & Broward is where they plan to do it.”
    “Bay County was hit by a Cat 4 Hurricane just 4 weeks ago, yet managed to count votes & submit timely results,” the Florida Republican continued. “Yet over 41 hours after polls closed Broward elections office is still counting votes?” Rubio also pointed out that Snipes “doesn’t know how many ballots are left to be counted” and that she isn’t regularly reporting results, which are “chipping away at GOP leads.”
    A liberal college professor who ran for Congress challenging Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz from the left, Tim Canova, made similar statements. Wasserman Schultz resigned as head of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) after leaked emails showed party officials seeking to rig the 2016 presidential primary against Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, but she continues to represent the Broward area in the House.
    A judge found in August that Snipes improperly handled mail-in ballots, and ordered her not to open mail-in ballots in secret after the Republican Party complained. Snipes’s defense rested on a claim that she didn’t know what the word “canvassing” meant, even though she is on the county’s Canvassing Board.

    In May, a judge found that Snipes’s office broke the law by destroying ballots in the 2016 race between Wasserman Schultz and Canova. Canova told The Daily Caller News Foundation that in that case, “they claimed to not know the difference between a federal and state investigation. They claim to be incompetent, but my impression is it’s partly a ruse.”

    Polling and early-voting results showed him performing well in 2016, then the reported results rapidly shifted to favor Wasserman Schultz, leading him to suspect manipulation. “So we put in a public records request to inspect some of the ballots, and if inspecting the paper ballot matched up, then it’s done, it will satisfy everyone,” Canova told TheDCNF. ” But the supervisor of elections stonewalled me for months.”

     “I was told they didn’t have scanned images, even though on election night they put the ballots through a scanner.

    So we filed a discovery request to see the paper ballots,” he continued. “Three days later [Snipes] signed an order to destroy the ballots and certified that they were not the subject to ongoing litigation.”

    “Her excuse was she just signed anything put in front of her and didn’t read it,” Canova said. “Then she said the ballots were put in the wrong place and that’s why they were destroyed. She concealed the destruction for two weeks.” Snipes’s position is an elected one, and she is a Democrat. Canova said even though Snipes admitted to destroying the ballots in a videotaped deposition, the government continued to fight the case. 

    “They’re using taxpayer money while bleeding us dry.” Canova questioned why Scott and state Attorney General Pam Bondi, who’s also a Republican, didn’t pursue Snipes for criminal prosecution. He said she could face felony charges that carry five years in prison.

     “We’re dealing with organized crime. I just don’t trust anything that comes out of this office,” he said. He said Republicans had joined with him to try to defeat Wasserman Schultz, saying “I might not agree with Tim about Medicare for All, but this about integrity, this is about getting out corruption.”
    Canova posted video of people putting bags of ballots into private vehicles, including a sports car.
    Rubio also retweeted that a teacher said found a box of provisional ballots left behind at a school after Election Day.

    Snipes did not return a request for comment. Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©