Do Parents Have Civil Rights? Kansas Sued For Trafficking Tiny Humans

In the wake of the settlement in the Right To Lie case, parents now have case precedent.

You will stop lying to steal and sell our children.

We may not be able to afford, let alone, find a competent attorney, but we are capable of invoking the powers of our civil rights, and filing in the court.

Typically, the Chancery, clerks of the court will rely upon internet searches on the merits of the case, which is why I first started blogging, for there was no verifiable source or historic reservoir of information for the fraud in foster care and adoption.

Unfortunately, there has been a very coordinated effort to promulgate propaganda which discredits the legal claims put forth by the original sources, the original parents.

What is even worse is the fact that there are masses of individuals online, social media, that are fanatical when it comes to the sensationalism behind the psychosexual propaganda, the likes of that pizzagate crap and "The Idiot Known As Q", fueled by questionable financial sources.

These anonymous and online personalities shall be held accountable for promoting propaganda, for monetary and other purposes.

With these two, aforementioned propaganda factors, federal judges, trained and sequestered from reality, encased in the bubble called Public Private Partnerships jacked-legged research and training, with only "pre-Emancipation Proclamation" case law to make a decision, parents have no chance, whatsoever, to successfully litigate.

Parents, rather, pro se litigants who take the risk of further public ridicule, for the passionate purposes of saving their children from a life of torture in foster care and adoption, and file in the courts, do so, not out of greed, for no dollar amount will make the parents or the children whole again, but do so to preserve the historic record.

The National Archives have been ravished and systematically destroyed for years in child welfare.

The pro se is now the keeper of the record.

Here is background on Kansas trafficking tiny humans.

Whether or not we win, we will not be stopped and you will stop lying to steal and sell our children, and you will cease and desist doing it in the name of the tax exempt god.

The question I present to the Courts, for legal preparation, of course, is this: "Do parents have civil rights since children have no civil rights?" because children, with all their identification, are still on the books as moveable chattel and I formulate the question of civil rights as a question of property rights, as opposed to parental rights.

Godspeed.

Schwab v. Kris Kobach, Kansas Department of Children and Family Services, et al - Colorado 18-cv-02190 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

JUDICIARY: Hearing on Examining The Need for New Federal Judges - Trafficking of Tiny Humans

In the spirit of fuchsia, I have provided a quick synopsis of the hearing:  

TRANSLATION: THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM IS CRUSTY, DUSTY, AND RUSTY.

The Judicial Conference is more focused on maintaining its current status quo operations rather than the administration of justice.

Southern boarder states do not have enough federal judges to process immigration cases or even do the 9th Circuit appeals.

Federal courts are having issues with people filing too many lawsuits.

Corporations are hustling federal courts because they can afford to prolong litigation, in what I call frivolous and 

Judges, who are far removed from reality and technology, are delegating to magistrates, who are far removed from reality and technology, who in turn, delegate to clerks, who are far removed from reality and technology, who cite legal precedents, which are far removed from reality and technology.

I know this as a fact.  I have watched them use my work for legal research because I am the only one who created databases, specifically for them in mind.  My introductory brief on reality and technology in the federal courts is on file with the U.S. House Judiciary Committee.  

Feel free to FOIA and let me know what they give you.

Hank Johnson, a former federal judge, demonstrates in his line of questioning how federal judges have absolutely no clue about federal child welfare laws of CAPTA or ASFA.  Children removed from parents at the border are automatically placed under the federal auspices of privatized foster care, under the court granted guardianship of corporations, where concurrent planning, adoption planning, is fast tracked under ASFA, and the child is sold adopted under that state's jurisdiction to maximize revenues.

Child trafficking, once crossing the border, morphs into what I like to call, the Trafficking of Tiny Humans, which means these kids are thrown into foster care to be bought and sold using federal and state taxpayer dollars called adoption.

Many of these child traffickers, called "coyotes", who do not get caught, dupe parents, spirit children away, and take them across the border to be sold as slave labor, whether it is for sex or free labor, or both.

What would you do if you had your child Legally Kidnapped?  Perhaps, that is why some people will continue to "illegally cross the border" over and over again.

Poverty is the crime of child abuse and neglect, which automatically makes illegally crossing the border with a child a crime, not a misdemeanor, justifying federal prosecution and placement of the child in foster care.

Mr. Samuel J. Kahn of Kent Holdings and Affiliates did not submit written testimony. Hmmmm....

Issa does not get Article III Judgeships and "zero-tolerance".  Some of these "illegal border crossers" cannot just up and go back home if you snatch their kids.  Issa never did like me.  I smashed him on child welfare about 10 years ago.  Still looking for that interview. Smooches!

Issa did not get the Detroit memo that plans are on the table to build a new immigration detention center, as rumors shall have it.  Some "illegal border crossers" enter from the other U.S. southern border, Canada.

9th Circuit has an interesting en banc  policy, identified by Issa and an even more interesting culture.

Hank, a former federal judge, did not know that pro se is a civil matter because criminal matters get federal court appointed representation.

I do not believe the child welfare terms of "foster care", "adoption", "CAPTA" nor "ASFA" were ever mentioned in this hearing.

How come DOJ, being the ones to prosecute these "illegal border crossers" never address child trafficking or the trafficking of tiny humans?

Well, that just sucks.

U.S. House Judiciary Testimony of Judges Lawrence Stengel, Roslynn Mauskopf 6-21-2018 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Someone In The DOJ Is Leaky On The False Claims Act

Someone from the U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney's Office
Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section

Someone is leaky in the DOJ.

On November 16, 2017, U.S. Attorney General issued a Memorandum on issuing external guidance.

He said he was going to stop doing guidance memos and open it up to the public when it comes but someone leaked a guidance memo after he said that.

U.S. Attorney Sessions Prohibition on Improper Guidance Memo - 11-16-2017 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

On January 10, 2018, Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Grantson of the Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section issued guidance on handling False Claims Act cases.

He guided the U.S. Attorney's Office to weed out cases because too many people were claiming fraud.

Well, isn't that judicial because he is instructing the U.S. Assistant Attorneys to weed out cases, or rather, "not intervene", or make a judicial determination on who gets due process or not.

But then again, how do we know this Memorandum is even verified, considering the fact that it was leaked.

It says ""confidential" and is reported by other sources.

Leaked Confidential DOJ Memo for Evaluating Dismissal of False Claims Act Cases 1-10-2018 by Beverly Tran on Scribd

On February 18, 2018, U.S. Attorney Sessions announced that he was going after leakers.

The leaked memo blatantly contradicts the Mission Statement of the U.S. Attorney's Office  and the position of Sessions on memos.

The United States Attorneys serve as the nation's principal litigators under the direction of the Attorney General. There are 93 United States Attorneys stationed throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. United States Attorneys are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, the President of the United States, with advice and consent of the United States Senate. One United States Attorney is assigned to each of the judicial districts, with the exception of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands where a single United States Attorney serves in both districts. Each United States Attorney is the chief federal law enforcement officer of the United States within his or her particular jurisdiction.

United States Attorneys conduct most of the trial work in which the United States is a party. The United States Attorneys have three statutory responsibilities under Title 28, Section 547 of the United States Code:

• the prosecution of criminal cases brought by the Federal government;
• the prosecution and defense of civil cases in which the United States is a party; and
• the collection of debts owed the Federal government which are administratively uncollectible

Although the distribution of caseload varies between districts, each has every category of cases and handles a mixture of simple and complex litigation. Each United States Attorney exercises wide discretion in the use of his/her resources to further the priorities of the local jurisdictions and needs of their communities.

Now, there are a few questions I have in hand:

1. Are the priorities of the local jurisdictions, now, to cover up fraud, or rather not intervene in FCA cases?
2. Is this memo real, and if it is, then why would the DOJ blatantly interfere with due process by opting to advocate on behalf of defendants in False Claims cases, drastically failing to even mention to refer matters of fraud to different criminal divisions of public corruption?
3. Are these defendants considered to be some of those "quasi-governmental organizations", meaning they are considered Public Private Partners which makes them part of the U.S. government, causing a conflict of interest if the U.S. Attorney intervenes?  This sounds exactly like the reason why States Attorney General do not intervene in matters of fraud in child welfare cases.  It is quite difficult to contemporaneously advise and advocate.
4. If this memo is fake, then what actions have been taken to mitigate the false advisement to U.S. Assistant Attorneys in matters of intervention, which is not part of the public record, particularly, since Sessions has announced that he is going after leakers?
5. If this is leaked memo, then what actions have been taken to identify the source and motivation for the leak.
6. Do whistleblowers have civil rights?
7. Is there an active investigation?

I knew there was going to be drama.

I better get my popcorn.

It looks like we are just getting this party started.

Stay tuned.

Sessions says he’s ‘aggressively’ going after leakers

WASHINGTON – Embattled Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he doesn’t regret recusing himself from the Russia investigation and has since championed one of President Trump’s pet projects: identifying leakers.

After Trump announced last year that the “real story” is not Russia but “illegal leaks,” Sessions has launched 27 investigations — up from three prior to him taking office, the attorney general told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo on “Sunday Morning Futures.”

“We’re going after this aggressively,” said Sessions, who has managed to hold onto his job despite Trump’s disgust with his Russia recusal that made way for special counsel Robert Mueller. “I am directing it personally.”

When disgraced former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was fired after lying about his contact with Russians, Trump and his allies in Congress called for action on the “real” crime – the leaks to the press that exposed Flynn’s conversations with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

“That is a violation of the law, to leak classified documents and it is being investigated,” Sessions said.

Flynn pleaded guilty Dec. 1 in the Russia probe for lying to the FBI and is cooperating in Mueller’s investigation.

As Mueller’s Russia investigation has encircled the White House, Trump and the GOP-led House Intelligence Committee declassified a controversial memo that aimed to cast doubt on the FBI launch of the probe.

The memo alleges the FBI relied on an anti-Trump dossier paid for by Democrats to obtain federal court surveillance of former Trump campaign associate, Carter Page.

Sessions said the Page warrant request “will be investigated and looked at.”

He declined to offer more details about his ongoing probes.

Despite all the grief he’s gotten for his March recusal, Sessions stood firm on his decision.

“I believe I did the right thing, the only thing I could do,” Sessions said. “I participated in this [Trump ] campaign and as such under explicit regulations of the Department of Justice; no one can participate in the investigation of a campaign in which they were an active participant.”

He added: “You can’t ask other members of the department to follow the law and follow the rules if the attorney general themselves refuses to do so.”

Sessions’ recusal put Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in charge of the FBI investigation in Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and possible collusion with the Trump campaign.

Rosenstein, a Trump appointee, appointed the special counsel in May under pressure to ensure independence.

Mueller, a Republican and former FBI director, was widely praised at the time by GOP lawmakers as being a fair and honest choice.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Angela Ward: Trying Something New & Hope It Can HELP.. How To Communicate With The Court.. Tools To Learn How To FIGHT BACK

When you have been ridiculed, slandered in the courts, lost all of your worldly possessions, including your children, based upon fraudulent information conveyed in an ex parte hearing, just like a FISC for a FISA warrant, where you have no money to buy justice, you teach yourself law and do it yourself.

There is no place in the U.S. Constitution that provides for a private corporation to dictate who gets access to the courts.

Angela Ward is a pro se litigant and is holding her own because she is an original source.

Just do it.

 

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Day 68.7. Without the 4th Amendment, We Are All Dredd Scott

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

If Mathew Spencer Peterson Can Be A Federal Judge, Then A Pro Se Can, Too

This man has no legal acumen to even hold a gavel.

There is nothing written in the U.S. Constitution which mandates a private corporation, the American Bar Association, to decide who has access to a court of law, including access to opportunies to either be appointed or elected to the judicial branch.

States and local governments allow the people to vote for judges, even though the campaign finance systems sucks in the area of judicial candidates, so why is it we cannot have federal elections for judges?

A pro se litigant has more experience than this man, and I just so happen to know a pro se litigant who can run circles around most judges. attorneys. House Judiciary members and their staffers.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Day 48.5 Carmichael and Carpenter

U.S. regulators drop fraud case against Wall Street financier Wey (Reuters) -

U.S. securities regulators on Friday moved to drop their fraud case against Wall Street financier Benjamin Wey, about a month after prosecutors dropped a related criminal case after a judge threw out some evidence In a filing in federal court in Manhattan, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said its case relied on the same evidence as the criminal case, and that it believed it would no longer be able to use it.

Prosecutors and the SEC in 2015 accused Wey, the founder of New York Global Group, of making tens of millions of dollars by secretly controlling large blocks of shares through “reverse mergers” between Chinese companies and U.S. shell companies, and selling his shares at artificially high levels.

The SEC also sued Wey’s wife, Michaela Wey, who was not criminally charged. “Today’s dismissal can only be described as a complete victory for our clients, Benjamin and Michaela Wey,” said David Siegal, a lawyer for the Weys.

SEC spokesman Ryan White declined to comment.

The criminal case against Wey collapsed in June, when U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan ruled that a huge cache of materials seized from Wey’s home and offices could not be used because they were obtained with overly broad search warrants that violated Wey’s constitutional rights.

Nathan said the seizure of items such as children’s school records, family photos and X-rays at minimum reflected “grossly negligent or reckless disregard” of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Day 40.8 Carpenter vs. US

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Day 40.5. Podesta Case Reassigned To Judge Contreras

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Day 33.2. Sloan Wins Pro Se at the Supreme Court

Oh looky, a pro se case precedent in false claims.

I will pull and post the SCOTUS opinion soon.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

The Magical Doors Of The Kingdom Were Opened: Beverly Tran, et al, v. Detroit Land Bank Authority, et al, 7-31-2017

My court sketch because cameras are not allowed.

Once upon a time I went to court.

Well, actually, it was July 31, 2017, in the Michigan Easter District Court in front of Judge Avern Cohn in the case of Beverly Tran et al v. Detroit Land Bank Authority, et al.

See, what had happened was...

I was so excited, the mystery, the intrigue, the comedy, the justice, the romance!

So, in my favorite summer big black hat and in my prescient, soothsaying mood, I played out the scene in my dreams.

I did an early creep, to sit in the back of the courtroom, by the door of course for easy access of exit, to sit incognito, to listen to what people had to say before the hearing commenced.

Everyone always ignores my presence and intelligence, which is a really great thing because you can just sit there, looking dead in their faces, and listen to every single word they have to say about you.

Well, lo and behold, five power attorneys walk into a courtroom, go to the attorney table, and commence to talk about their legal technical procedural game plan of how they are going to take me to a full, blown out trial, complete with sanctions, because....hold on a second, this is really funny... (personal lol) to litigate against me, using the full, multi-million dollar collective resources of their clients and their firms, because I exercised my legal right to report federal fraud, perpetrated upon the people of Detroit, mainly for speaking out for the children of "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth).

Then enters a gentleman.

He smiled at me.

He was the only one who smiled at me which made my mind start to reel.  "Who was this strange man, why is he smiling at me, and do I already know the answers to my own questions?"

The gentleman gingerly inquired, "Are you here for the Tran case?

I responded, "I am just here to take notes." showing him my blank sheets of paper.

He was adorable.  He was playing with me.

Anyway, now comes the attorney of record in my case. Crystal Hopkins.

Then, I heard the gentleman introduce himself to the five power defendant attorneys.  "Hi, I am the U.S. Attorney who declined intervention.  I am just here to witness."

I knew he had hidden in his hands the denoument of the hearing, but I kept my cool, as hard as it was to do.

(This is the part of the story where the comedy comes in.)

Crystal Hopkins walks in with her faithful sister, dumps mounds of files on her attorney table, then asks if I had 'checked in'.

I simply said, "This is your motion, not mine."

Then she got snotty, "Well, you have to check in."

I just stared at her, fully aware that she had lost her mind quite some time ago.

She is still attorney of record.  She is supposed to check in for me.

"Did you get the notice of appearance I sent you?" she quipped.

"Nope." and I made the gentleman across from me heard it, too.  I wanted to share a chuckle with him.

Besides, I was a bit disappointed that the Ypsilanti Police had not arrested her prior to walking into the courtroom, as rumor on the streets had it there was an active warrant out for her arrest, but hey, what do I know.

And then Judge Avern Cohn walks in.

Avern Cohn & Damon Keith
"The Old School Civil Rights Soldiers"

He was sooooooo cute because he had that "old soldier" kind of walk that I know so well, but I could not readily confirm my train of thought right then because I may have broken out into a high pitched squeal, like a giddy little school girl.

The five defendant attorneys all gave greetings and introductions to the Judge.

Then, Cohn asks, "Where is the attorney representing Hopkins & Associates?" which would be the time for Crystal Hopkins to respond.

Instead, she sat at her lil attorney table, with big stacks of files, shuffling paper back and forth, open file, close file, open file, close file, shuffle, shuffle, shuffle...hehehehe, even the mysterious gentleman sitting across from me was smirking as he would look over his shoulder to observe my reaction, of smirking right in synch with him.

It was a hearing at her request, so there was no need for any documents and that is why it was so funny.

Then she finally responds to the Judge, "Your honor, Beverly Tran did not check in,"

The second heralding for the attorney representing Hopkins & Associates came from the Judge.

Crystal responded, in the whine of a kindergartner."Your honor, Beverly Tran is in the courtroom."

A clerk of the court who, benignly enough, quickly guided Crystal to respond to the judge by making a a comment for her to speak up because the judge was hard of hearing, which I did not witness when the other attorneys spoke to the court.

Thrice, the Judge asked, "Where is the attorney for Hopkins & Associates?  Is he here?"

"Oh, I am the attorney representing Hopkins & Associates, I am a she.  Beverly Tran is in the courtroom, your honor."

Judge Cohn calls out to me, mind you, besides there was only the other gentleman and Crystal's sister in the gallery.

I raised my hand, high over my head and waved, "Hiya!"

"Beverly Tran, you should be up here.  Why don't you come up here." invited Cohn.

I felt as if the trumpeters were heralding the celestial announcement that I had finally been summoned to enter the magical kingdom, to be conferred with the powers to take out the Meanies.

The gentleman opening the door
to the magic kingdom for me.

As I was about to walk through the court partition to take my throne at the attorney's table, the gentleman from across the aisle, had leapt to his feet, and, in some sense, to me, genuflected, lowering his head in honor, as he opened and held the partition door for me.

I heard the angels herald my entrance.

Taking a dramatic pause to absorb the illumination of my romantic fairy tale, I graced my gentleman with a simple, "Merci."

Judge Cohn proceeded with the quickness. "Ms Hopkins, you filed a motion to remove yourself as attorney of the case."

"Yes, your honor"

"Granted, goodbye."  Crystal scuttled herself out the courtroom as fast as possible.

"Beverly Tran, do you have anything to say?"

"Not at this time."

"Beverly Tran, will you be representing yourself?"

"Your honor, I am indigent.  I cannot afford an attorney.  Pursuant to the statute, I would have had to have the attorney of record petition you for grant to lift the seal to speak with another attorney..."

Cohn cut me short, "I asked if you were going to represent yourself."

I looked across the courtroom to the observe the wide-eyed gang of five stare at me in disbelief and stated proudly into the record, "YES!"

The smiling gentleman from across the aisle jumped to attention and interjected into the record, "Your honor, I just want to make sure Beverly Tran knows the seal has been completely lifted on the case.  There is no seal."

Allow me to do an aside.

The judge had just allowed a pro se to proceed in a qui tam, which is the first time in the history of the False Claims Act.

The court referred to me by my full name, Beverly Tran, which is a legal move I shall expound upon later.

The U.S. Attorney's Office just gave me the green light to publish all docs and tell my epic, romantic tale.

Wow.  Just wow.

"I believe defendants have motions to be heard" stated the judge.

"Your honor, we would like to dismiss our motion for sanctions."

"Motion granted.  Next."

"Your honor, we would like to dismiss our pre-trial motion."

"Motion granted.  Anything else?"

"Your honor, we would like to motion for another 30 day extension."

"I just gave you 90 days to respond to the complaint.  Now you want another 30 days?  Fine.  Granted, you have 30 days to handle this matter."

The Pingree Monument, Detroit

It was at this point Cohn went into a court lecture, an historic legal lecture where he went into the story of the "Lawsuit King" named Hazen Pingree.

"Pingree used to file so many lawsuits against these big corporations, they finally erected a statute to him.  Do you want another statute to be erected?  I strongly encourage you to get together and chose one attorney to deal with Beverly Tran or you it is going to cost your clients thousand and thousands of dollars.  If there is nothing else before this court, we are adjourned."

The gang of five attorneys power walked out the court room, with me close behind where I was empowered to confront a Meanie, Reggie Turner, attorney for defendant Title Source, Inc., the same defendant who wanted to impose sanctions on me, a proud member of "The Poors" (clinched teeth), because I snitched to the U.S. DOJ about their fraudulent activities in stealing the Hardest Hit Funds that were originally intended for the victims of Detroit foreclosures.

Oh, you have no idea the lust for retribution I felt coursing through my veins to go off on this, this, this, licensed attorney, biting my tongue for what I really want to say about him.

In front of the other members of the gang of five, I confronted Reggie Turner and told him that he needs to disclose his relationship with me to his colleagues and demand he remove himself from the case.

"I have no relationship with you!" snarled Reggie Turner.

I said, "Do you really want me to put your dirt out there because I will and I have no problem doing it.  As a matter of fact, I already did.  beverlytran.com.  I do not like the nefarious activities you did to my friend.  I do not like what you did to Mr. Conyers."

"Fine, I was his campaign manager.  He won, didn't he."  as Reggie disappeared like a ghost,

Reggie Turner trying to slide up and ruin our moment,
in my photo pretending to be Mr. Conyers' campaign manager
when he was not wanted to even be there.

muttering to himself down the hallway, nervously laughing to himself, that I did not know what I was talking about.

This, "licensed attorney" Reggie Turner, was never the campaign manager for Mr. Conyers.

Ever!!!!

Michigan Senator Bert Johnson was the campaign manager for Mr. Conyers, which is an entirely different tale I shall tell at a later date.

Reggie Turner was working behind Mr. Conyers' back with Cynthia Martin, to take him out of office, at the behest of the "leader" of the Democratic National Committee.

Reggie Turner was going around holding fundraisers, laundering the money back to Cynthia Martin, where it was not reported to FEC, and they more than likely split the kickbacks.

How I felt about calling out Reggie Turner after court.

Reggie Turner was going around telling everyone that, not only was he the campaign manager, he was going to take over Mr. Conyers' seat because [sic] Mr. Conyers was going to hand it to him.

I made sure he would never run for my friend's seat; I bought out the domains.

http://reggieturnerforcongress.com

(Make sure to click the link or you will miss out on the fun!)

Cynthia Martin, former Chief of Staff for Mr. Conyers, is deep in the middle of an international investigation of, well, I am only going to drop one item relevant to this story, mortgage fraud.

Yes, mortgage fraud, in "tandem" for lack of a better term, with the Detroit Land Bank Authority with the assistance of Cynthia Martin.

Reggie Turner was trying to take out Mr. Conyers to ensure the property fraud scam, and false claims, my case, were continue to exist, whether knowingly or willingly, but guess what, I made sure that plan was smashed.

So, if Cynthia Martin is under federal investigation, something tells me that Reggie Turner might be, also, as his emails are in that cache of stuff my #Superfans are combing through, because, after all, his colleagues witnessed him state that he was the campaign manager for Mr. Conyers' re-election campaign, right?

How do I know all this information?

Stay tuned.

I have many, many more tales to tell.

It was at this point I felt the love surge in my spirit, extended my arms, and said to the now, gang of four, "Gentlemen, welcome to the annals of history.", and curtsied as glided away on cloud 9.

Then, there was one.

One alpha male in the gang of four swiftly heeded the advice of the court and took it upon himself to represent to gaggle of barristers and ask for my email.  Seriously?

These are supposed to be the creme de la creme of seasoned legal experts and they do not know how to vet me, prior to the hearing, for my contact information?

Google, dudes, Google 'Beverly Tran', I did not dedicate the last 10 years of my life optimizing search engines to generate extensive data for the search terms "Beverly Tran", "John Conyers" and a few other key terms, for nothing.

I was nice.  He was nice.  I gave him my email.

So, the moral of the story is, again,

"Do not be mean to my Sweetie.  Period."

On a mission...

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©