Showing posts with label Jimmy Carter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jimmy Carter. Show all posts

Thursday, July 23, 2020

JUDICIARY: No President Is Above The Law Act - Featuring George Bush & Bill Clinton

I wonder what George Bush has to say about this?

I know Bill Clinton is already not very pleased with me.


Chairman Nadler Statement for the Markup of H.R. 2678, the No President is Above the Law Act

Washington, D.C. –Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) delivered the following opening remarks, as prepared, during the markup of H.R. 2678, the No President is Above the Law Act:

"The two bills we are considering today center around the same basic theme: presidential accountability. When the nation’s founders wrote the Constitution, after having just fought a war against a tyrant, they stood fast to a key principle—that the Executive must not be a king and must, instead, be accountable to Congress, to the people, and ultimately, to the rule of law.

"H.R. 2678, the 'No President is Above the Law Act,' reaffirms that important principle.

"This legislation, which I introduced along with Representatives Swalwell and Deutch, would suspend the statute of limitations for any federal offense committed by a sitting president, whether it was committed before or during the president’s term of office.

"This bill is necessary in order to close a dangerous loophole in the law created by Department of Justice policy—most recently embodied in a legal opinion by the Office of Legal Counsel—which holds that a president may not be criminally prosecuted during his or her term in office.

"Under current law, throughout the entire period that a president is presumed by some to be immune from prosecution, the statute of limitations continues to run on any offenses they may have committed.

"Since most federal criminal offenses carry a five-year statute of limitations, a president who is not prosecuted while in office for a crime they may have committed could end up evading justice altogether if the statute of limitations runs out before their term is over, particularly if they are elected to a second term.

"Allowing complete immunity from criminal prosecution merely because of the office a person holds would make a mockery of the rule of law.

"Statutes of limitations are an important element of criminal law. As a general matter, they provide a necessary balance between protecting defendants from delay and allowing prosecutors adequate time to investigate and charge cases. They ensure that the possibility of a criminal prosecution does not hang over a defendant’s head forever and they encourage prosecutors to bring charges while evidence is fresh.

"But the law has also long recognized that certain limited exceptions to this general rule are necessary, such as when the commission of a crime has been concealed or a defendant has fled or is unavailable. The case of a sitting president, whose prosecution is barred under Justice Department policy—no matter how strong the evidence may be—fits comfortably among such exceptions.

"I would note that even if the OLC opinion is reversed, there may be many practical difficulties in bringing an indictment against a president who is still in office. It is necessary, therefore, to simply pause the statute of limitations so that the president—any president—can be held to account for his or her actions and to ensure that the presidency is not a get-out-of-jail free card.

"I want to thank Mr. Swalwell and Mr. Deutch for their work in helping to craft this legislation. The 'No President Is Above the Law Act' would ensure that every person—no matter his or her title or office—is held accountable under our laws.

"I urge all Members to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2678

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the tolling of the statute of limitations with regard to certain offenses committed by the President of the United States during or prior to tenure in office, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 10, 2019
Mr. Nadler (for himself, Mr. Swalwell of California, and Mr. Deutch) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the tolling of the statute of limitations with regard to certain offenses committed by the President of the United States during or prior to tenure in office, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “No President is Above the Law Act”.

SEC. 2. TOLLING OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

(a) Offenses Committed By The President During Or Prior To Tenure In Office.—Section 3282 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:


“(c) Offenses Committed By The President During Or Prior To Tenure In Office.—In the case of any person serving as President of the United States, the duration of that person’s tenure in office shall not be considered for purposes of any statute of limitations applicable to any Federal criminal offense committed by that person (including any offenses committed during any period of time preceding such tenure in office).”.

(b) Applicability.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to any offense committed before the date of the enactment of this section, if the statute of limitations applicable to that offense had not run as of such date.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, May 4, 2020

Jimmy Carter Has Been Activated!

NIV Lessons from Life Bible
Jimmy knows.

Laura does not.

Laura did not even read Jimmy's new book before the interview.

The prolife movement started in Detroit.

Prolife came from the foreign invasion to take over the United States through privatization to cover up the industry of trafficking tiny humans by re-animating the residuals of the peculiar institution.

https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/ops/WICPC2016.pdf
The greater increase in the number of "The Poors",
there shall be a positive, direct correlation,
where Pearson's R = 1.00,
to the amount of Medicaid fraud in child welfare
one can get away with stealin' the children, land & votes.
The origins of prolife came when the *russisn/israeli/ukrainians* took over the Michigan Republican Party, then the Republican National Committee.

Jimmy initiated WIC, the Title V Program of Women, Infants & Children, which, of course, is riddled with fraud because the research is funded through federal grants to private, foreign corporations, which just so happen to be Corporate Shape Shifters, like Insight Policy Research, who like to generate propaganda to secure more federal research grants for more streamlined feasibility in its endeavors to procure state administrative, private contracts, to their research associates to become vendors for infant formulas, which no one has taken the time to do any research on correlations between infant mortality and the promotion of artificial breastfeeding, made by foreign corporations.

WIC was established in 1972 by an amendment to the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–642, as amended). WIC is a nonentitlement, discretionary program. In April 2016, 8.8 million women, infants, and children participated in WIC. For fiscal year 2016, Congress appropriated $6.35 billion for the program.
Meet Kathleen Flanagan, one of those high quality propagandist who cranked out some WIC dirty data crap for the purposes of demonstrating that gerrymandering is an acceptable practice when it comes to facilitating policy creation for human asset forfeiture to foreign corporations in Social Impact Bonds to generate more fraudulent cost reimbursement to Medicaid in Child Welfare.

Mike Duggan knows all about this.

Kathleen knows about infant mortality and how to maximize revenues maintaining human capital all over the world through her USAID lab rat work.

Katthleen knows about administrating those tiny human lab rat research programs, too.

Kathleen Flanagan
President & Chief Executive Officer
Kathleen Flanagan
https://www.linkedin.com/in/flanagankathleen
Kathleen Flanagan is president and chief executive officer of Abt Associates. She assumed the position on October 1, 2009, after a distinguished career working across the broad range of markets and policy areas that reflect the company's business today. 

Flanagan joined the company in 1983 as a policy analyst in the Health Area. In 1989 she became managing vice president of the company's Labor Economics Research Area, overseeing research on workforce development and income security programs. In the mid-1990s she launched the International Workforce and Education Practice, winning projects from clients including the U.S. Agency for International Development, World Bank and U.S. Department of Labor. In 1998, she launched the company's Housing and Community Revitalization practice and built a team of more than 75 researchers and technical assistance staff working on affordable housing and community development policies at the federal, state and local levels. In 2005, she was named group vice president for social, economic, and health policy.

Flanagan is a board member of the Professional Services Council (PSC). She is secretary of the PSC Executive Committee and chair of its Civilian Agencies Council. She is also a board member of the Maryland World Trade Center Institute, member of the Massachusetts Women's Forum and member of the CEO Forum of the Washington, D.C. Chapter of the Society for International Development.

She is a founding member and former president of Jobs Have Priority, a Washington-area nonprofit that provides job training and housing assistance to homeless individuals and those at risk for homelessness. 

The purpose of prolife is to cover up the tiny human lab rat research and experimentation, the work of the lord, based in Magnitsky propaganda and to fund political campaigns.

The Tale Of Pat Cipollone, Laura Ingraham & The Industry Of Trafficking Tiny Humans As Lab Rats - Magnitsky Propaganda

Those aborted tiny human baby parts the prolife propaganda likes to illuminate never includes the research zygotes or miscarriages, which, more than likely, happen when the host, the hottest policy term of the day for a gestating mother or petri dish, happen when people are poor, because there is a lack of medical health care access, and food, which is why WIC was created.

We have now closed the tauntological circle on the purpose of prolife.

This is about Parental Rights.

Jimmy has knows.


#maytheheavensfall

Jimmy Carter: Democrats Should Abandon Pro-Abortion Position


Appearing on the radio talk show of conservative radio host Laura Ingraham today, former President Jimmy Carter said he believes the Democratic Party should moderate its position on abortion, which it currently supports without limits and funded at taxpayer expense.

Carter said toning down the stridently pro-abortion position would help win back Republicans who abandoned the Democrats because of abortion and other liberal social issue positions.

Carter said:

“I never have believed that Jesus Christ would approve of abortions and that was one of the problems I had when I was president having to uphold Roe v. Wade and I did everything I could to minimize the need for abortions. I made it easy to adopt children for instance who were unwanted and also initiated the program called Women and Infant Children or WIC program that’s still in existence now. But except for the times when a mother’s life is in danger or when a pregnancy is caused by rape or incest I would certainly not or never have approved of any abortions.”

“I’ve signed a public letter calling for the Democratic Party at the next convention to espouse my position on abortion which is to minimize the need, requirement for abortion and limit it only to women whose life are in danger or who are pregnant as a result of rape or incest. I think if the Democratic Party would adopt that policy that would be acceptable to a lot of people who are now estranged from our party because of the abortion issue.”

In August 2008, the Democratic Party approved a platform that mirrors President Barack Obama’s pro-abortion views.

“The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right,” the platform reads.

The party has removed any language calling for abortions to be “rare,” or even “safe,” preferring to concentrate on keeping them legal.

That fact wasn’t lost on Karen Cross, the political director for National Right to Life.

She said the platform is even out of step with Democrats, and pointed out that 42% of those who identified themselves as Democrats in a June 2008 Polling Company survey said the oppose all or most abortions.

“Once again, the pro-abortion leadership of the Democratic Party demonstrates an allegiance with the extreme pro-abortion lobby and continues to show that it is out of step with a large number of its own membership and out of step with the majority of the American people,” Cross told LifeNews.com.

The final aspect of the language hearkens to Obama’s pledge to Planned Parenthood in a July 2007 speech saying his first action as president would be signing the so-called Freedom of Choice Act. That’s a Congressional bill that would overturn every abortion limit nationwide from a ban on partial-birth abortions to parental notification laws.

The platform statement on abortion doesn’t end there but includes two more paragraphs that serve as a public relations ploy to moderate that extreme position on abortion.

It talks up birth control and promotion of contraception as supposedly a means to end abortions even though stats seems to show promoting the morning after pill, for example, fails to reduce abortions.

“The Democratic Party also strongly supports access to affordable family planning services and comprehensive age-appropriate sex education which empowers people to make informed choices and live healthy lives. We also recognize that such health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions,” the platform proposal reads.

It also provides the party and Obama with political cover by saying it supports childbirth and helping pregnant women.

“The Democratic Party also strongly supports a woman’s decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre- and post-natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs,” it concludes on abortion.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, January 18, 2020

An International Day Of Peace 2020 - May The Heavens Fall

I will make the world say your name, with such a delight.

#sayhisname


"The Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed is ready for the heavens to fall. I bet she has cocktails & popcorn."



Sometimes, I derive joy from the smallest things in life.

Happy Martin Luther King, Jr. Day!

Happy Anniversary, Sweetie!

A Day of Peace

In honor of the Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday and in honor of the gentle spirit who authored John Conyers, Jr., I present this piece, again, to pray for all to recognize that we, as humans, are many in body, but may only become united under the universal care for the peaceful health of society.
this legislation,

The issues surrounding unruly town hall meetings and angry mobs were addressed over 200 years ago in the Federalist Papers, specifically #9, Hamilton and #10 Madison.

Hamilton #9The utility of a Confederacy, as well to suppress faction and to guard the internal tranquillity of States, as to increase their external force and security, is in reality not a new idea. It has been practiced upon in different countries and ages, and has received the sanction of the most approved writers on the subject of politics.

What Hamilton basically says is that an insurgent faction disrupts consolidation and consensus of groups, better known as a republic. This idea was expounded and refined in Madison #10.

Madison identified the "inner tranquility" of the consolidation and consensus of groups as the "majority".  He further spoke of the futility of non-peaceful protests as they disregarded established legislative processes, having elected government representatives.

"Men of factious tempers, of local prejudices, or of sinister designs, may, by intrigue, by corruption, or by other means, first obtain the suffrages, and then betray the interests, of the people."

Historically, civil disobedience only works when functioning under the policy of peace. These protests are not peaceful in language or activities, an early presentation of failure of the insurgence.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise therof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.The Bill of Rights: First Amendment

The key word is "peace". Once this tenet of the First Amendment is violated, peace, the government is empowered to protect the people, pursuant to the General Welfare Clause in the U.S. Constitution. The following is an excerpt of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States, called the General Welfare Clause:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

Violence, be it verbal, emotional, physical, or economic, becomes grounds for government intervention, or rather the calling of the police to maintain the peace. When this happens you have an insurrection, pursuant to the General Welfare Clause. Under this light, health care as commerce, or rather Universal Health Care, is seen as a "provision for the common defense social disease, meaning maintainability of individual and social health, becoming interchangeable with the temporal terminology of General Welfare.

Quintessentially, Universal Health Care is one in the same with the Common Defense and General Welfare of the people of the United States of America. Here is a visual model for greater understanding:




There is a lack of organization and understanding, as the insurrections constantly demonstrate a significant failure in mastering a rudimentary education of the social mobilization.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, December 25, 2019

Avern Cohn Retires From MIED - Will He Bear Witness, Next?

Avi bearing arms on the MIED bench (center)
Oh, Avi has lots of tales to tell.

I mean, he has so many tales to tell, he, too, could be summoned to bear witness when the heavens fall, but, hey, what do I know?

I know I like this picture of him, better, because I drew it.

I witnessed him do the "Old School Civil Rights Legal Dog" pimp walk.

It was awesome.

#maytheheavensfall

Judge Avern Cohn leaving federal bench at age 95

Detroit — After four decades behind the bench and at age 95, U.S. District Judge Avern Cohn is calling it a career.

"It is time to pass on my responsibilities to others," Cohn said in a statement released by the court Friday. "Most judicial systems have a mandatory retirement age. While I don't believe in mandatory retirement, there comes a time in the course of one's work that they retire and let their work be borne by younger persons."

U.S. District Judge Avern Cohn
Avern Cohn,
Old School Civil Rights Legal Dog
According to the federal court, nearly two dozen of his criminal cases were reassigned on a blind draw to other judges last week. The remainder of his criminal and civil dockets will be reassigned the same way in coming days.

"Judge Cohn is a valued, valuable and beloved member of our bench, a mentor and friend to me and others," U.S. District Chief Judge Denise Page Hood said in a statement. "I hold him in the highest regard."

Cohn was born in Detroit. His mother, Sadie, was a homemaker, and his dad, Irwin, eventually became the fourth name on the door at Honigman, Miller, Schwartz and Cohn.

Cohn enrolled at the University of Michigan in 1942, just in time to have his academic career waylaid by World War II. The Army sent him to engineering school, abandoned the program and redirected him to pre-med classes.

Discharged in 1946, he gave medicine six more weeks, then enrolled in law school.

Earlier in his career practicing law, Cohn represented looters for free after the 1967 uprising in Detroit. He also served as a Detroit police commissioner when that meant working to integrate the force and had his name taken in vain in an Elmore Leonard novel.

Appointed in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter, Cohn assumed senior status in October 1999. While that typically means part-time duty, nothing changed for Cohn except his title.

 As a judge, he struck down the University of Michigan's anti-hate-speech code as overbroad and presided over the case of former Detroit City Council President Monica Conyers, who drew 37 months for taking bribes.

At a courthouse celebration of his 95th birthday in July, colleagues noted his relentless curiosity and rabid reading habit, which includes six newspapers a day.

Known both for his intellect and his temper, Cohn could still be withering with attorneys earlier this year. He told The Detroit News in July, "I've cooled down. Age. But every so often, I get impatient."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, September 30, 2019

Hillary Clinton Called Trump An Illegitimate President

The Book of Gutsy Women
Yes, Hillary has some big brass balls, too.
Egads!

I believe Hillary is going to be the first to #sayhisname.

Now, that is gutsy.



I just say, the heavens shall fall.

On a mission...


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, July 22, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: Avern Cohn - One Of The Original Old School Civil Rights Legal Dogs Celebrates His Birthday In Detroit

Image result for detroit coney island birthday party
"Happy Birthday, Original Old Dog!
Show the world how we do it in
Detroit."
Happy Birthday, Precious!

I would pop by and grab a few coneys for the boys, but that may be a bit awkward for some.

Instead, from afar, I send my love and shall see you soon.

Yes, there is a complete volume of Civil Rights that is being suppressed by the #coloredrevolution, but fear not, for I am recording the fall of the heavens.

At nearly 95, Judge Avern Cohn 'calls it the way he sees it'

AVERN COHN, ON THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT BENCH SINCE 1979, HAS AN INTELLECT AS KEEN AS GINZU KNIVES, EVEN AS HE TRIES TO GET A HANDLE ON HIS TEMPERAMENT

Detroit — The first time Matthew Schneider met Judge Avern Cohn, Cohn threw him out of the courtroom. But that's not the point of the story.

Avern Cohn, Senior United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, talks in his courtroom at the Theodore Levin United States Courthouse.
Avern Cohn, One of the Original
Old School Civil Rights Legal Dogs
The point is what happened next — and what happened next helps explain why there will be a throng in that same federal courtroom Tuesday, eating Coneys and raising plastic cups to Cohn's 95th birthday.

They'll be toasting an eventful near-century.

A medical school dropout, as he likes to put it, Cohn is legendary for his blasts of temper, but also renowned for his ability and his intelligence.

He represented looters for free after the 1967 uprising, served as a Detroit police commissioner when that meant working to integrate the force, had his name taken in vain in an Elmore Leonard novel, and keeps quasi-effective hand-written reminders taped to the low ledge that stands between his stern gaze and a parade of nervous attorneys:

"Keep cool!!!"
My first drawing of Avi

"He who angers you controls you."

"No matter how high the throne, there sits but an ass!"

Cohn has been on the U.S. District Court bench since 1979, and you hate to say he's still sharp because that's a low-threshold term you use for someone who can keep track of four bingo cards.

“He calls it the way he sees it, and we need more of that in this world.”

MATTHEW SCHNEIDER, U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
He carries a full caseload. He reads six newspapers a day and gives three news sites one last check before bed. He has an intellect and a tongue as keen as Ginzu knives, even as he's trying to get a handle on the temperament.

He has "a relentlessly curious mind," as former chief judge Gerald Rosen puts it, and a history of important cases.

And he has Schneider, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, as a friend.

Schneider is 45, still less than half Cohn's age. At 29, he was four years out of law school and new on the federal prosecutor's staff, at a hearing for a case about human smuggling.

The details aren't vital. What's important, he says, is that he made a mistake and Cohn "invited me in no uncertain terms to leave his courtroom."

Schneider was stricken, he says. He thought his career was over. Then the phone rang.

It was Cohn. They met that day, Schneider says, and had a long, open talk about procedures, judicial philosophy and history.

They're still talking: Schneider an appointee of Donald Trump, Cohn an appointee of Jimmy Carter, both striving for honesty, even if their methods of delivery aren't quite the same.

"My philosophy is about candor," Schneider says. "Judge Cohn's philosophy is about candor.

Judge Cohn keeps notes to himself on the bench inside his courtroom to help keep perspective on the cases before him.
Judge Cohn keeps notes to himself on the bench
inside his courtroom to help keep perspective on the cases before him.
"He calls it the way he sees it, and we need more of that in this world."

Finding satisfaction
The way Cohn sees it, it would be wrong to enjoy his job.

He's devoted to it, and he has no plans to step away from it, even if his steps these days involve a walker. But lives change in room 218, often for the worse, and it would be inappropriate to take pleasure in that.

"I find satisfaction," he says, in a well-reasoned decision, a thoughtful application of the law or a solid instruction to a jury.

He is pleased as well when he is moved to change his mind, as he did earlier this month; having taken a stand in a case about city liability, he kept reading and pondering and invited the opposing side to file another brief.

"Wisdom is in short supply," he likes to say. "The fact that it comes late is no reason to reject it."

A recent morning docket included what appeared to be a routine sentencing for a chronic drug abuser who had assaulted a fellow resident of the federal prison in Milan.

“Wisdom is in short supply. The fact that it comes late is no reason to reject it.”

JUDGE AVERN COHN
Partway through, wisdom once again made an appearance. Wouldn't it be better, Cohn asked, for the judge who would handle sentencing on the defendant's latest drug case to also decide on his punishment for the kicks and punches?

Cohn's sentence, he said, might affect the decision of the other judge. Or it might not. But true justice demanded patience.

The defendant, his legs shackled, shuffled away. Cohn, leaning on a railing, labored down the two steps from the bench to his waiting walker.

Outside the courtroom, the defendant's attorney said, "I love Judge Cohn."

Alvin Sallen, 70, comes from a family of lawyers. His father and uncle both practiced in Cohn's court.

"He has no reluctance to do what he thinks is right," Sallen said. "Part of me would love to go to trial in front of him someday."

The other part probably knows about the taped-up notes, and the reason Cohn posted them.

'Excitable, forceful'
Cohn was born in Detroit. His mother, Sadie, was a homemaker, and his dad, Irwin, eventually became the fourth name on the door at Honigman, Miller, Schwartz and Cohn.

Cohn enrolled at the University of Michigan in 1942, just in time to have his academic career waylaid by World War II. The Army sent him to engineering school, abandoned the program and redirected him to pre-med classes.

Discharged in 1946, he says, he gave medicine six more weeks, then enrolled in law school.

“Always remember that the lawyers have as much right to be in the courtroom as the judge!”

NOTE ON JUDGE COHN'S DESK
Amid three decades of practice, he volunteered as a lawyer with the ACLU, aligned with various other civic and political causes, and came to the attention of the Detroit Police Red Squad, whose dossier on him turned out to be boring — some newspaper clippings, he has said, and maybe a surveillance report.

He'd been angling for a federal judgeship for more than a decade before Carter finally chose him. At one point, he was torpedoed by Sen. Donald Riegle, a fellow Democrat, who questioned his temperament.

"He was right," Cohn later told the federal court's historical society. "I was militant, excitable, forceful, occasionally probably interrupted people, occasionally irritated people."

Today, he says he has changed. At least a little. Or anyway, he has tried. But it's a resoundingly bad idea to come to his courtroom unprepared.

'No limitations'
Another note taped to the bench: "Always remember that the lawyers have as much right to be in the courtroom as the judge!"

He wants to act that way, he says. Honest.

"I've cooled down," he contends. "Age. But every so often, I get impatient."

The years, Cohn says, have done the usual things to his body. He doesn't offer specifics, but he shakes hands like someone with aching fingers. Though he hires a driver for the commute to and from his home in Birmingham, he says that's to give him more time to read; on weekends, he pilots a Cadillac SUV.

Avern Cohn, Senior United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, talks in his courtroom at the Theodore Levin United States Courthouse.
Avern Cohn, Senior United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, talks in his courtroom at the Theodore Levin United States Courthouse.
(Photo: David Guralnick, The Detroit News)

Doctors have told him to eat or drink more protein, says his judicial assistant of 15 years, Lori Van Hove. They suggested Ensure, but he hated it, so she slipped him some of her Atkins chocolate shakes until he decided he didn't want those, either.

Van Hove will catch him sneaking a Diet Coke, "and I'll look at him and be like, 'Judge?'"

Whatever he's doing, or avoiding, Cohn says he's fine where it counts.

"So far," he says, "as far as I can tell, I have no mental limitations."

Rosen, who's now a principal in a mediation service, concurs.

"He's brilliant," Rosen says. "He's an icon and a legend. And a force of nature."

Within nature, says Detroit Zoo CEO Ron Kagan, Cohn is something else entirely.

In the late 1990s, Kagan led a photo safari to Kenya and Tanzania for civic leaders and zoo donors. Among them was Cohn, his authoritative presence and "probably the most well-read person I know," Kagan says.

At the foot of Mount Kilimanjaro, he says, the spectacle of elephants, zebras and giraffes "brought tears to Avern's eyes."

Travel is one of the pursuits kept in Cohn's past, along with sailing and tennis

“He's brilliant. He's an icon and a legend. And a force of nature.”

GERALD ROSEN, RETIRED CHIEF JUDGE, US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Now he does what his health will dependably allow, which is hear cases.

Officially, he's been on senior status since 1999. Effectively, he's doing exactly what he did before.

He's technologically adept enough to serve as a visiting judge in California without leaving his chambers in Detroit, but he refuses to send emails. Instead, he mails letters — "some of the most beautiful, thoughtful, kind notes I've gotten from anybody," Rosen says.

Also in contrast, he was malleable enough to pay for an official portrait at the urging of his wife, Lois Pincus Cohn, who owned an art gallery in Birmingham until four years ago.

The painting is a judicial tradition.

But he's either modest or stubborn enough that it moldered in a courthouse closet for 12 years, until Rosen insisted he let it hang on another judge's wall.

In another art form, he had no options.

At a Michigan Opera Theatre benefit, Cohn bid $1,500 to have Leonard attach his name to a character. The Detroit News was given an advance copy of "Mr. Paradise" in late 2003 and called to tell him about his role: a greasy lawyer who served as the agent for a pair of blue-collar hit men.

"Oy," Cohn said. "Oy, oy, oy."

Chili dogs and pizza
The flesh-and-blood Avern Cohn presided over the case of former Detroit City Council President Monica Conyers, who drew 37 months for taking bribes.

Thirty years ago, he struck down UM's anti-hate-speech code, determining that it was too broad. He dismissed criminal charges against a UM student who had published fantasies about violent crimes against women on the Internet, and declined to jail Nada Prouty, a Lebanese immigrant an FBI and CIA operative accused of sharing secrets with her brother-in-law.

Across four decades, he has taken another firm stand a few blocks from the courthouse: Lafayette Coney Island over American.

He's held a lunchtime open house there on his birthday every year since his appointment. Van Hove, ruling that Tuesday's celebration will be too large for the space, instead hired Lafayette to set up a grill and chili pot in Cohn's jury room.

"I could live on chili dogs and pizza," Cohn says. Unfortunately, the women in his life — his wife of 27 years, and assistant of 15 — won't allow it. They're not big on sweets, either, though he keeps a deep bowl of candy on his desk for visitors.

But a fellow only turns 95 once, and his objection has been duly noted. Van Hove cleared his schedule for the afternoon, she says, and he can eat whatever he wants.

Then Wednesday, he'll be back at work, the way he always is.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, July 13, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: When Alan "I Kept My Underwear On" Dershowitz Hits Front Page Of The Root

When The Root publishes, you know the heavens are about to fall.

There is an entire army of journalists who have been lying in wait, surrounding the kingdom, ready to bring down the heavens, upon the call of charge from the Old School Civil Rights Legal Dogs, upon the arrival to Detroit.

Dershowitz was mean to my Sweetie.
... Governmental eavesdropping today is simply out of control, and it is entirely possible that we have seen only the tip of the iceberg....The Nixon clique may just have been the worst offenders, though we can never know this with certainty unless we learn more about what went on during earlier administrations. The [Martin Luther] King episode-which in my view is the single most reprehensible example of unjustified intrusion that we are aware of-is enough to raise serious questions about national security wiretap policies during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations.... That the King tap was authorized by well meaning good guys with beneficent purposes only demonstrates how pervasive the problem of wiretapping has been.

"I kept my underwear on": The newest legal defense in ethics
By Harvard Legal Scholar Alan Dershowitz

Alan Dershowitz: Sure I Got a Massage at Jeffrey Epstein’s Mansion, but I Kept My Underwear On

Welp, welcome to the slippery sleazy slope that comes with billionaire Jeffrey Epstein’s recent arrest for child sex trafficking.

Internet sleuths have uncovered a 2015 video of Harvard attorney and Epstein’s friend, Alan Dershowitz, who worked to get Epstein a sweetheart deal in a 2008 plea agreement, admitting to getting a massage at Epstein’s mansion.

During an interview with Miami news station WPLG regarding Britain’s Prince Andrew (another friend of Epstein) and his alleged sexual involvement with an underaged girl who was allegedly kept as a sex slave by Epstein, Dershowitz not only bashed the accuser, calling her an “admitted prostitute and a serial liar” but claimed that the then-teen was not victimized and in fact “made her own decisions in life.”

Dershowitz admitted to being at the billionaire’s home but noted that he’d never seen an underaged girl at Epstein’s place despite sworn testimony from Epstein’s former butler who claimed that Dershowitz was at the residence at the same time that underaged girls were there. Dershowitz has an easy explanation for that: “Were there young women in another part of the house giving massages while I was around? I have no idea of that!”

Oh, and did Dershowitz ever receive a massage at Epstein’s house? Yep. But Dershowitz claimed that it was from an adult woman and he kept his underwear on.

“I kept my underwear on during the massage. I don’t like massages particularly.”

Watch the entire interview below but I warn you, it’s triggering and mad cringey.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, June 29, 2019

Cocktails & Popcorn: Trump v. Jimmy Carter - The Battle Of The Illegitimate v. Forgotten Presidents - Who Will #sayhisname First?

Image result for scolding two boys
"Make Trump & Jimmy #sayhisname, now or I will
make Walter do it!"
Recently on Cocktails & Popcorn, Jimmy called Trump an "illegitimate president" saying something about quantitative stuff.

Then, Trump called Jimmy a "forgotten president" and made sure to run in his face that the Democratic National Committee treated him like dirt for being such a terrible president.

The best way to settle this spat is for Trump to just stop obstructing justice and pull that IG Report from his backpocket while Jimmy unmasks his super secret, undercover federal official leaker who told him the tale of how the *russian/israeli/ukrainians* interfered in the 2016 election.

I believe it is impeachment re-election 2020 campaign time!

They both can tell their tales in the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, or perhaps, in the Districts court, or when the heavens fall.

Maybe, Trump will beat Jimmy and #sayhisname to kick off his 2020 re-election campaign.

Perhaps, Jimmy will preach more about ecclesiastic law and the history of trafficking tiny humans.

I bet Trump and Jimmy will come to learn that they have a mutual friend, but, hey, what do I know?

I know we should have them tell their tale of why Jimmy called Trump illegitimate and why Trump called Jimmy forgotten.

I know the Fourth of July is going to be spectacular in Detroit.

I also know that it would be crass to not invite Walter Mondale to tell us his tale.

Will Walter Mondale #sayhisname first, and take the spotlight from Trump and Jimmy?

I wonder what the Trump v. Mondale Battle is going to be rolled out.

Stay tuned because the Old School Civil Rights Legal Dogs have been summoned.

#NeedMoreChaos

Trump escalates spat with ‘forgotten president’ Jimmy Carter

The remarks came one day after Carter questioned the legitimacy of Trump’s election, saying the president likely won because of Russian interference.

OSAKA, Japan — Donald Trump on Saturday blasted Jimmy Carter as the “forgotten president,” one day after Carter questioned the legitimacy of Trump’s election, saying the president likely won because of Russian interference.

“He’s a nice man. He was a terrible president,” Trump said at a news conference after wrapping the G-20 summit in Japan. “He’s been trashed within his own party. He’s been trashed.”

Carter, who served between 1977 and 1981, made the allegation Friday while speaking in Leesburg, Va., saying a full investigation of Russian election interference would show that Trump didn’t actually win the election against Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Trump acknowledged that he had seen the comments but attributed them to Carter’s loyalty to the Democratic Party.'
“Everybody now understands that I won not because of Russia, not because of anyone but myself,” Trump said. “I went out and campaigned better, smarter, harder than Hillary Clinton.”

In his remarks, Carter called on Trump to condemn Russia for their interference in the election and said he should “admit that it happened.”

Trump insisted Saturday that he did raise the issue with Russian President Vladimir Putin during a private meeting the previous day. But publicly, Trump made light of Moscow’s election meddling, jokingly telling Putin, "Don't meddle in the election, president. Don't meddle in the election.”

Putin, after appearing to hear the translation, laughed while Trump grinned.

The exchange was just the latest instance of Trump dismissing concerns over the Kremlin’s attempts to tilt the 2016 election.

In 2018, after a meeting with Putin in Helsinki, Trump appeared to accept Putin’s election meddling denials over the conclusions of U.S. intelligence agencies, which have said the Russian president orchestrated the interference campaign. And two weeks ago, Trump said in an interview that he might be willing to accept information from a foreign source during the 2020 election, adding that he would not necessarily report the activity to the FBI. He later tried to walk the statement back.

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe did not establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump’s campaign and Kremlin intermediaries, but his final report did outline how Moscow used hacking techniques and digital disinformation to try and boost Trump.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, June 28, 2019

Cocktail & Popcorn: JIMMY CARTER: Another Old School Civil Rights Legal Dog Emerges - The CyberMarch To Detroit

Image result for giggling girl in love gif
"But when are you going to #sayhisname?"
I wonder where in the world did Jimmy ever come up with such a fantastic idea?

Well, not really.

Marches and campaigns can be legal, too, you know.

I would have posted the video but CSPAN sucks because they banned me.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?462138-1/conversation-jimmy-carter-walter-mondale

This is just about the same thing Barb said.

I wonder where Barb came up with it?

Well, not really.

Jimmy Carter: Investigation would show Trump lost 2016 election

Former President Jimmy Carter said Friday morning that Donald Trump is an illegitimate president due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Carter, 94, was speaking at a Carter Center event on human rights in Leesburg, Va., when he was asked how he would deal with Russian meddling in the last presidential election.

“The president himself should condemn it, admit that it happened, which I think 16 intelligence agencies have already agreed to say,” said Carter. “And there’s no doubt that the Russians did interfere in the election, and I think the interference although not yet quantified, if fully investigated would show that Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf.”

Moderator Jon Meacham then asked if Carter thought Trump was an illegitimate president. Carter paused before replying as the audience laughed.

“Based on what I just said, which I can’t retract,” said Carter smiling, “I would say yes.”

At the G-20 summit in Osaka, Japan, on Friday, Trump joked with Russian President Vladimir Putin, wagging his finger and saying, “Don’t meddle in the election, please,” to which Putin smirked. Although a number of U.S. intelligence agencies and special counsel Robert Mueller found that Russia had systemically interfered in the 2016 election, Putin called it “mythical interference” earlier this week.

Though there has been no evidence that Russia interfered with vote tallies, they did reach out to the Trump campaignhack Democratic email accounts and flood social media.

The number of U.S. intelligence organizations that stated Russia interfered with the 2016 election include the CIA, FBI, Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.

Trump himself nevertheless repeatedly cast doubt on that conclusion.

“They said they think it’s Russia,” Trump said in July 2018. “I have President Putin, he just said it’s not Russia. I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be.”

When pressed the following day, Trump attempted to clarify, saying, “I accept our intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election took place. It could be other people also. There’s a lot of people out there.”



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Jimmy Carter, Old School Civil Rights Legal Dog, Has Entered The Stage

Jimmy is back!

FUN FACT! JIMMY IS A VOTING  RIGHTS ICON

I will find out what the two of you talked about, and I am not referencing Kim Jong Un.

Former President Jimmy Carter offers to travel to North Korea to help Trump broker a nuclear deal with Kim Jong Un

jimmy carter
  • Former President Jimmy Carter has offered to travel to North Korea to meet Kim Jong Un in a bid to break the diplomatic stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang over denuclearization.
  • Democratic Representative Ro Khanna told Politico that Carter had expressed a willingness to travel to the rogue state.
  • He said that Carter's experience negotiating a denuclearization framework with Kim Jong Un's grandfather could be a vital asset to the Trump administration.
  • Carter became the first US president to visit North Korea in 1994, where he met with Kim Il Sung, the country's former leader.
  • Negotiations between Trump and Kim in Hanoi, Vietnam, broke down last week, leaving denuclearization negotiations in deadlock.
Former President Jimmy Carter has offered to travel to North Korea to meet Kim Jong Un in a bid to break the diplomatic stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang over the denuclearization of the rogue state.

Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, told Politico that the former president had expressed his willingness to travel to North Korea in a conversation on Thursday.
"I think President Carter can help (President Trump) for the sake of the country," Khanna later told CNN.

Carter was the first US president to travel to North Korea, visiting the country in 1994 to meet Kim's grandfather, former leader Kim Il Sung. Carter's visit helped to defuse the first North Korean nuclear crisis, paving the way for the Agreed Framework, in which North Korea agreed to give up its nuclear program in exchange for aid.

He returned to the country in 2010, where he helped secure the release of American captive Aijalon Gomes.

In the interview with CNN, Khanna said that Carter's experience negotiating with Kim's grandfather would be an asset for the Trump administration, following last week's collapse of negotiations between Kim Jong Un and President Trump in Hanoi, Vietnam.

"I think it would be so profound because he could talk to Kim Jong Un about his grandfather and the framework he established," Khanna said.

Khanna said that he and Carter had on Thursday been discussing plans to revive the denuclearization plans the former president brokered with Kim Il Sung, to develop a new joint framework for peace.
The Carter Centre and White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Carter seems to hold no great respect for Trump, and in an appearance on Stephen Colbert's show in March 2018 agreed when the host said Trump's election showed Americans were willing to elect a "jerk" as president. Trump meanwhile has derided Carter's leadership and "everyman" image while in the White House.

However, Carter has previously made efforts to broker a relationship with the administration, and was critical of hostile press coverage of Trump in October 2017, when he first offered to help Trump negotiate with Kim.

"I think the media have been harder on Trump than any other president certainly that I've known about," Carter told New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd.

"I think they feel free to claim that Trump is mentally deranged and everything else without hesitation."

Then remarks were welcomed by Trump, who tweeted: "Just read the nice remarks by President Jimmy Carter about me and how badly I am treated by the press (Fake News)."

"Thank you Mr. President!"

The nuclear summit between Trump and Kim came unstuck when Kim demanded an end to US sanctions.

Analysts earlier in the week said that satellite imagery showed North Korea had started rebuilding a long-range missile launch site in the wake of the collapse of the negotiations.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, February 17, 2019

CORBETT: Government by Emergency - #NewWorldNextWeek

A bit of history of National Emergencies to better understand the Michigan Emergency Manager Law, the Detroit Bankruptcy, Grand Bargain, and all the stealin' of the children, the land and the votes.


Here's a list of the 31 national emergencies that have been in effect for years

President Jimmy Carter

Nov 14, 1979: The National Emergency With Respect to Iran, in response to the Iran hostage crisis.

Nov 14, 1994: The National Emergency With Respect to the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, that combined two previous national emergencies focused on weapons of mass destruction.

Jan. 2, 1995: The National Emergency With Respect to Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process placed economic sanctions in response to the Jerusalem bombing.

March 15, 1995: The National Emergency With Respect to Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources was an effort to prevent potential deals between oil companies.

October 21, 1995: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers Centered in Colombia was declared after increased reports of drug cartels laundering money through American companies.

March 1, 1996: The National Emergency With Respect to Regulations of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba was after civilian planes were shot down near Cuba.

November 3, 1997: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan implemented economic and trade sanctions.

President George W. Bush.

June 26, 2001: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans imposed sanctions on those aiding Albanian insurgents in Macedonia

Aug 17, 2001: The National Emergency With Respect to Export Control Regulations renewed presidential power to control exports in a national emergency since the Export Administration Act of 1979 lapsed.

Sept 14, 2001: The National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks was in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.

Sept 23, 2001: The National Emergency With Respect to Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism was in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

March 6, 2003: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe was an effort to punish associates of Robert Mugabe.

May 22, 2003: The National Emergency With Respect to Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest was issued following the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

May 11, 2004: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria was in response to Syria supporting terrorist activity in Iraq.

June 16, 2006: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus was in response to charges of fraud in the Belarus presidential election.

Oct 27, 2006: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo was in response to violence around the Congolese presidential election runoff.

Aug 1, 2007: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon was in response to a breakdown of the rule of law in Lebanon.

June 26, 2008: The National Emergency With Respect to Continuing Certain Restrictions with Respect to North Korea cited the risk of proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material. President Trump renewed this June 22, 2018 citing the “existence and risk of proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material on the Korean Peninsula and the actions and policies of the Government of North Korea continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat.”


April 12, 2010: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia was in respect to threats posed by Somali pirates.

February 25, 2011: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya froze the assets of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

July 25, 2011: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Transnational Criminals was in response to the rise in crime by specific organizations: Los Zetas (Mexico), The Brothers’ Circle (former Soviet Union countries), the Yakuza (Japan), and the Camorra (Italy).

May 16, 2012: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen addressed political unrest within the Yemen government.

March 16, 2014: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine was in response to the Russian invasion of Crimea.

April 3, 2014: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan was in response to the ongoing civil war.

May 12, 2014: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic was in response to violence towards humanitarian aid workers.

March 8, 2015: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela was in response to human rights violations.

April 1, 2015: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities was in response to Chinese cyber attacks on the U.S.

Nov 23, 2015: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi was declared after a failed coup.

President Donald Trump

Dec 20, 2017: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption imposed sanctions on the Myanmar general for his role persecuting Rohingya Muslims.

Sept 12, 2018: The National Emergency With Respect to Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election attempted to prevent any meddling with the 2018 midterm elections amid the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Nov 27, 2018: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Nicaragua was declared by President Trump in response to violence and the Ortega regime’s “systematic dismantling and undermining of democratic institutions and the rule of law” that constitutes an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, January 7, 2019

DOJ: U.S. Solicitor General Noel Fransico Petitions SCOTUS To Figure Out If Lybia Can Sue The Court For Not Being Able To Sue In Court

Of course, I have attempted to water this down to start taking small sips in understanding that our elected officials are implementing privatization policies through foreign actions by ignoring the simple fact that we are a tripartite government which is structured as a trust.

Privatization is the usurpation of Judicial powers by going through that god awful administrative law in those Privateering UCC ships that sail off after stealin' the children, land and the votes.

The fun part about all this is that SCOTUS may experience a constitutional crisis, which, dare I say, may be a situation of war crimes, including violations of the statutes of fraud in #cyberwars, better recognized as propaganda.

This is Jimmy Carter.

Jimmy is not mean to my Sweetie.

This is about the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976.

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of l976, Pub. L. 94-583, 90 Stat. 289l, 28 U.S.C. Sec. l330, l332(a), l39l(f) and l60l-l6ll [hereinafter the FSIA], limits the role of the Executive branch in suits against foreign governments and governmental entities by precluding the Department of State from making decisions on state immunity. The FSIA codifies the restrictive theory of immunity, incorporating criteria, which the courts had developed in applying the theory, while codifying and applying international law. (See ch. 5, Restatement 3rd, Foreign Relations Law of the United States, sec. 451-463, pp. 390, 435, American Law Institute (1986).) The Act prescribes the means of service for suits against a foreign state or agency and instrumentality in Section.

This is about privatization because it looks like the Michigan Emergency Manager Law where the Executive Branch can make policy through Executive Order usurping the powers of the Judicial Branch.

Only the Congress makes law.

In a nutshell, this is shockingly the progenitor to the Michigan Manager Emergency Law, which was born of Michigan Child Protection Law, the international model of privatization.

Petitioners are family members of Mihai Alimanestianu, one of seven United States citizens killed in the 1989 terrorist attack on United Trans Aeriens (UTA) Flight 772 over Niger.

They sued the Government of Libya.

They lost and appealed.

The district court entered a judgment in favor of petitioners, but their claims were dismissed on appeal pursuant to an agreement between the United States and Libya that required Libya to pay money into a settlement fund to compensate American victims of terrorism and the United States to restore Libya’s sovereign immunity to suit in U.S. courts.

Settlement funds is code for children's trust fund because that is how they are structure complex financial fraud schemes.

Then they sued the court for stealin' their claims.

Petitioners then sued the United States in the Court of Federal Claims (CFC), alleging that the government had taken their claims against Libya without just compensation.

So, what had happened was....

The State Department made the determination, devoid of any due process, that Libya sponsored the UTA attack and could not be immune from being sued which sounds exactly like Child Protection Law, because you are guilty, until proven innocent, which you can never be proven innocent as the quasi-judicial determination of rights to property fell under the Executive Branch.

Then, in the spirit of Child Welfare Law, "reasonable efforts to prevent the removal of the child were made" with lots of great programs, billed to the U.S. Treasury, just like child welfare bills to Medicaid, that Libya's parental rights to its sovereign immunity was terminated and its goods were

Beginning in 2003, when Libya decided to “relinquish its weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs,” the United States and Libya worked to reestablish normal diplomatic relations. 

Congress passed the Libyan Claims Resolution Act.



Then, Libya decided to settle for $1.3 billion to restore relations with the U.S., but not the UTA attack claims.

Image result for briberyIn October 2008, the Secretary of State certified receipt of the settlement funds from Libya, triggering the restoration of Libya’s sovereign immunity under the LCRA. Pet. App. 5a. President Bush then issued an Executive Order stating that the United States had “espoused” and “settled” the terrorism-related claims of U.S. nationals against Libya pursuant to the claims settlement agreement. 

TRANSLATION: AS SOON AS THOSE $$$ DROPPED, LIBYA GOT ITS SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY BACK SO IT COULD TURN AROUND AND SUE THE COURT FOR NOT LETTING IT SUE UNDER THE IN COURT.

The Executive Order set up a different funding stream to compensate the victims and dismissed all the DOJ claims in the Judicial Branch by setting up Public Private Partnerships to funnel the money through child welfare NGOs like they always do.

Just consider this form of stealin' an "humanitarian action" because people have properties to build and research to develop so they can keep stealin'.


Then, Libya claimed that they could sue the court for dismissing their claims because they did not have sovereign immunity, which amounts to stealin' personal property under the Fifth Amendment.

The court of appeals reiterated that prohibiting a claimant from asserting a claim in U.S. courts did not amount to a “physical invasion of property.

Then it goes on to say, "Blah, blah, blah", per se, usurpation of Judicial Powers, blah,blah, blah.... you can read the background model, here.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/fcsc/docs/lib-ii-184.pdf

Prior to 1976, a foreign state sued in United States courts would hie itself to the State Department and ask for an immunity letter. If the State Department acted favorably, the letter would have the practical effect of ending the lawsuit. To be sure, the Supreme Court's decision that such letters should be honored was a judicial determination based upon criteria for judicial deference developed in a series of foreign affairs cases. But such wholesale deference came to look very like surrender, particularly because the State Department's conduct was oft-times redolent of backroom politics: the department's decision to issue or withhold an immunity determination was not always based upon a strict reading of the Tate letter. The department regarded its function as partaking more of "political powers" -in Marshall's words 34-than of any quasi-judicial duty. It was difficult to see why litigants with presumably valid claims, often amounting to great sums, should live at the mercy of the diplomatic considerations which the State Department felt bound to honor.
Under the Act, the court-a federal court if the foreign state wants it that way-makes the immunity determination, looking only to the standards set out in the Act and, in theory at least, not to its own or somebody else's view of how nice or nasty the state-defendant's government is. The Act codifies a number of exceptions to a general principle of immunity, provides a procedure for serving process on a foreign state, and defines the assets that may be the subject of execution to satisfy judgment.
https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1875&context=mjil 


So, basically, the question I am presenting is if a claim is a moveable or immoveable one, because it sounds like chattel law to me, like what they do in adoption, termination of parental rights, quiet title actions, you know the routine when it comes to stealin' the children, land and the votes.

This action sounds like a foreboding proclamation to a series of Quo Warranto , but hey, what do I know?

I know this sounds like a constitutional crisis because there are more actions in the SCOTUS pipeline.

I also know it is not wise to be mean to my Sweetie.
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the government’s restoration of Libya’s sovereign immunity in U.S. courts and settlement of petitioners’ claims for more than $10 million in damages effected a taking of petitioners’ property without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©