Showing posts with label 13th Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 13th Amendment. Show all posts

Friday, January 17, 2020

Pete Lucindo & His Co-conspirators Are In The Spotlight

Someone should definitely initiate investigation into Pete Lucindo for the simple fact that he has a personal interest in the well-being of children, when it comes to asset forfeiture and trust funds.

Just saying, because I know nothing, which is why there should be an investigation.

https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/search?q=lucido

You never know what you may find.

Michigan lawmaker apologizes for telling reporter boys could 'have a lot of fun with her'

Sen. Pete Lucido apologized for the "misunderstanding," but also said the incident was "blown out of proportion."

A rookie news reporter was heaped with praise Wednesday for standing up to a powerful Michigan lawmaker who she says humiliated her when he allegedly told a visiting group of Catholic high school boys that they could “have a lot of fun” with her.

But Allison Donahue, who is just 22 and has worked for the Michigan Advance for eight months, said the hardest thing about her confrontation Tuesday with state Sen. Pete Lucido outside the Senate chamber in Lansing, Michigan was telling her father about it later.

“He was upset,” she told NBC News. “I frequently call him after work and tell him about the crazy days I have. It was heartbreaking to tell my dad something like that.”

Donahue said something similar happened to her when she was 15 and “I had to tell him about that too.”

Lucido, a 59-year-old Republican, issued an apology Wednesday. But his mea culpa came after first telling The Detroit Free Press that he didn’t feel he owed Donahue an apology, saying the whole matter had been “blown out of proportion.”

“I apologize for the misunderstanding yesterday and for offending Allison Donahue,” he said in a brief statement.

Donahue said she appreciated Lucido’s apology and said she hopes he read her first-person account of Tuesday’s encounter.

“I hope he reaches out and we can talk more,” she said. “Maybe we can find some common ground.”

I tried to interview Sen. Peter Lucido. He told me a group of schoolboys ‘could have a lot of fun’...
I waited outside the Michigan Senate chamber to ask Sen. Peter Lucido (R-Shelby Twp.) on Tuesday for a comment about the Detroit Metro Times’ story reporting that he was a member of a violent,...

NBC News reached out to Lucido, but there was no immediate response. Leaders of his own party as well as the Democrats were concerned by the incident.

“I take this very seriously and intend to have a very intense and lengthy conversation with the senator as soon as we’re done with session,” Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey, a Republican, told reporters. “If those words that were reported are accurate, it’s very unacceptable and that’s all I’ve got to say about it.”

Shirkey and Senate Minority Leader Jim Ananich, a Democrat who represents the city of Flint, later formally requested a sexual harassment investigation into Lucido.

Lucido is a married father of three whose district includes the state capital Lansing and who currently serves as the Majority Whip. He is also reportedly eyeing a possible run for governor in 2022 against Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat.

Donahue is from western Michigan and covers education, immigration, women’s and LGBTQ issues for the Michigan Advance.

In her account, Donahue said she was waiting to ask Lucido about his involvement in an anti-Whitmer group on Facebook which includes “posts about graphic violence against Democrats, anti-Muslim rhetoric and degrading comments about women.”

Lucido had been hosting a group of students from his alma mater De La Salle Collegiate, which is an all boy’s Catholic high school in the Detroit suburb of Warren.

“I asked Lucido for a moment to address the issue at hand, and he told me he would catch up with me after he was finished honoring the group of students,” Donahue wrote. “As I turned to walk away, he asked, ‘You’ve heard of De La Salle, right?’”

Donahue said she hadn’t.

“It’s an all boys’ school,” he told me, Donahue wrote. “You should hang around! You could have a lot of fun with these boys, or they could have a lot of fun with you.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

TRUMP: Speaks Upon The Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution In Jamestown, Virginia

With each use of the Predictive Modeling Crappy lump and dump, arbitrary and capricious, pseudocientific, fake ass, variable label of "African-American" applied in public discourse, another one-drop baby is born, prematurely, with legal shackles of property ownership in chattel law.

And you wonder why nothing ever changes.

But, now, the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) want to bring back segregation to its glorious splendor through parental rights in privatization, and are prepared to launch #coloredrevolutions to distract the masses with rainbow propaganda, to cloak the trafficking of tiny humans, what has built this great nation.

There is still the 13th Exception, as I like to posit, just to watch people freak out when they actually figure out that slavery was never abolished because they now just call it commerce, I just call it for what it is, highly sophisticated financial fraud schemes of asset forfeiture to foreign operations, because the majority of them are just Corporate Shape Shifters and it is still legal to procure and purvey tiny humans.

Human asset management, modern day human trafficking, is called child welfare and we can start with the history of Foster Care and Adoption.

Virginia Statutes 

Negro Womens Children to Serve According to the Condition of the Mother, 
Virginia Act 12 (1662)164 
Whereas some doubts have arisen whether children got by any Englishman upon a Negro woman should be slave or free, Be it therefore enacted and declared by this present grand assembly, that all children born in this country [sic] shall be held bond or free only according to the condition of the mother, And that if any Christian shall commit fornication with a negro man or woman, he or she so offending shall pay double the fines imposed by the former act.

WILLIAM WALLER HENING, THE STATUTES AT LARGE; BEING A COLLECTION OF ALL THE LAWS OF VIRGINIA, FROM THE FIRST SESSION OF THE LEGISLATURE IN THE YEAR 1619 170, § 12 (1823)





#sayhisname

The First Foster Care Case of Emancipation: Elizabeth Key

Elizabeth Key (fl. 1655–1660) was a principal in one of the important early court cases that shaped the evolving law of slavery in seventeenth-century Virginia. Her mother's name is not preserved in the surviving documents, but it is known that she was of African birth or descent and that an English planter, Thomas Key, claimed ownership of her. Depositions taken when Elizabeth Key sued for her freedom proved that he was her father and had been fined for impregnating her mother. His surname occasionally appeared in the records as Kay or Kaye, suggesting its pronunciation. She was known when young as Elizabeth, Bess, or Black Bess, and was born about 1630 or 1632, probably on the north side of the James River near its mouth. Her father resided there late in the 1620s and in 1630 when he was a burgess for Denby (later a part of Warwick County and still later of the city of Newport News) in the General Assembly.

In the autumn of 1636 when Thomas Key and his wife were preparing to return to England, he transferred Elizabeth to Humphrey Higginson, later a member of the governor's Council, for a period of nine years. Key specified that Higginson treat her well and that if Higginson returned to England before the end of the term of service, he must take the girl with him and allow her to have her freedom, or that if Higginson died before the end of the nine years, the girl would become free. Higginson promised to treat Elizabeth as if she were his own child.

Thomas Key died shortly thereafter, even before he left Virginia. In spite of the terms of the agreement, Elizabeth evidently remained in constant service from then until the winter of 1655–1656, long beyond the specified nine years. By then and through a series of events that are not documented, she passed from Higginson's service (he moved to England) into that of John Mottrom, a prominent and relatively prosperous planter in Northumberland County, near the mouth of the Potomac River. By the summer of 1655 she and William Grinsted, who may have been one of Mottrom's white indentured servants for a time, had a son and another child who died in infancy.

Mottrom died in 1655. The inventory of his estate, taken on July 4 of that year, separately identified six servants and five "Negroes." That the men who compiled the inventory listed the two classes of laborers separately suggests that they regarded the "Negroes" as essentially different in status from the other servants, probably as enslaved for life. How Mottrom regarded them is not known. The estate inventory included "Elizabeth the Negro woman & her sonne."

Elizabeth sued the administrators of Mottrom's estate to obtain her freedom. She had to rely on the assistance of a local planter or perhaps the county clerk to prepare the necessary legal documents, obtain and verify a copy of the 1636 agreement between Thomas Key and Humphrey Higginson, take the depositions that established her parentage and age, and present her case to the county court. One of the court records identified Grinsted as her attorney. What that meant was that he was her attorney in fact, not an attorney at law. It was an important distinction. An attorney in fact was an agent who acted for a person, either with or without a formal power of attorney. Women, minors, and other dependent people often required the assistance of free adult men to represent their legal interests in court. That was what Grinsted did. An attorney in fact need not even be educated, much less trained in the law, and references to Grinsted in the county records suggest that he was then in his early twenties and not literate.

On 20 January 1656, a Northumberland County jury decided that Elizabeth should be free. The administrators of Mottrom's estate appealed the verdict to the governor and members of the Council of State, who comprised the Quarter Court, also called the General Court, which was colony's only court of appeal. The court heard the case on 12 March 1656. The court's records for the period are lost and the reasons for its decision are not known, but it is clear that the court ruled against her.

The legal issues involved were important and in this particular instance somewhat complicated. Under the English common law doctrine of partus sequitur partem, a father's status determined that of a newborn child. Thomas Key was free, so his daughter should have been born free. Under another principle of English common law, Englishmen could not hold Christians in slavery, an important point because Elizabeth had been baptized and was a member of the Church of England.

She appealed the court's decision to the General Assembly that first met on 10 March 1656. At that time and for almost another quarter century thereafter, the General Assembly had authority to hear and rule on appeals from judgments of the General Court. The General Assembly's original records for the period are also lost, but some of its papers relating to her case were subsequently copied into the Northumberland County record books. In the surviving texts, she was for the first time identified as Elizabeth Key.

The assembly referred the evidence to a committee of burgesses, who concluded that the Northumberland County jury had been correct and that "by the Common Law the Child of a Woman slave begott by a free-man ought to bee free." That appeared to confirm the enslaved status of Elizabeth Key's mother and that Elizabeth Key had been held in slavery, not as a servant for a limited specified time. The committee also noted that she had been christened, that Higginson had been her godfather, and that "by report shee is able to give a very good account of her fayth." The committee of burgesses therefore determined that under all the existing rules of law, even without any clear parliamentary or Virginia statutes and in spite of the General Court's verdict, she was entitled to her freedom and to her father's surname. The burgesses also stated that she was entitled to compensation for the time that she had been a servant or slave beyond the nine years specified in the agreement of 1636. Nevertheless, because nobody appeared at the assembly to argue the estate's side of the case, the burgesses recommended that the case be sent back to the county court.

Early in the summer of 1656, one of the administrators of Mottrom's estate asked the governor to order the county court not to act until the General Court could again consider the case, and the governor complied, but the county court acted, anyway, perhaps before it received the governor's directive. On 21 July 1656, the justices of the peace in Northumberland County ruled that Elizabeth Key be free, that she be paid from Mottrom's estate the customary freedom allowance of corn and clothing that an indentured servant received at the end of his or her service, and also that she receive compensation for the additional years of her service as the burgesses had recommended. By those acts, the county court freed her from slavery according to the common law and also from any lesser service according to the law of master and servant as understood and administered in Virginia.

On that very same day William Grinsted (also spelled Greensted and Grimstead in the records) and Elizabeth Key posted their banns and declared their intention to marry, and one of the administrators of Mottrom's estate later signed over to Grinsted all the estate's claim of ownership of Elizabeth Key or her labor. By that act the estate relinquished all claim to her as a slave or to her labor as a servant.

The legal issue of her freedom being settled, few additional occasions occurred for county officials to record information about her. By the summer of 1660 Elizabeth Key Grinsted had another son and a daughter named Elizabeth. Her husband later died, and she may have married a second time. The will of John Parse (or Pearce), recorded in Northumberland County on 20 May 1667, indicates that he had married the widow Elizabeth Key Grinsted and suggests that she was dead by then. Parse bequeathed 300 acres of land as well as livestock and household items to his underage daughter Elizabeth Parse and 500 acres of land and other livestock to John Grimstead and William Grimstead, whom he identified as his sons and also as his sons-in-law. Elizabeth Key's sons who were then living were named John Grimstead and William Grimstead. By the legal usages of the time, the phrase son-in-law embraced many more people than a daughter's husband and often meant a male who occupied the legal relationship of a son, what in the twenty-first century would be called a stepson. It would have been within that meaning of the phrase that Parse described the sons of his wife as his own sons or sons-in-law.

In time, the county's officials forgot or chose to ignore Elizabeth Key Grinsted Parse's origins as the illegitimate daughter of an English man and an enslaved African woman. Early in 1685 the county court ordered that two of her grandsons be bound out to learn a trade, which was commonplace for white children but not for people of African birth or descent. A year later their father—her son—served on a jury, indicating that the county court no longer regarded him as part African but as a white man and a loyal subject of the king.

Elizabeth Key's successful suit to secure her freedom was probably responsible directly or in part for the General Assembly's passage in 1662 of an act to reverse the English Common Law doctrine of partus sequitur partem and replace it with partus sequitur ventrem, making the status of the infant depend on that of the mother. The law also increased the penalties for fornication between men and women of different races. Thereafter, at the time of their birth the children of white male Virginians and enslaved female laborers legally became somebody's slave property for life. In 1667 the assembly also changed the law to specify that conversion of an enslaved person to Christianity did not confer freedom on that person. The new laws were two among several instances in which the needs of Virginia tobacco planters for laborers and the practical consequences of managing enslaved workers led seventeenth-century legislators and judges to modify or reverse ancient rules of English law for the benefit of the planters.

The unforeseen and unfortunate consequences of Elizabeth Key's freedom suit were innovations in Virginia law that influenced legal codes elsewhere in the English North American colonies and that doomed hundreds or thousands of descendants of European men and women to lifetime slavery along with thousands of men and women of African birth or descent and an increasingly large population of mixed-race men, women, and children.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, October 11, 2018

Kanye, Trump & The Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution

I do not know what I enjoy more, the media freaking out on not knowing how to acknowledge that they promulgate the residuals of the peculiar institution, or the fact that Trump is taking on chattel law by discrediting the advisors in his cabinet in listening to the people.

Buckle up, Act 2, Scene 3 is about to start because slavery was never abolished in the U.S.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, February 11, 2018

Michigan Peter Lucindo Sucks & The 13th Exception


A fan asked me to take a look at two Michigan House Bills, 4486 and tie barred 4487, so I did.




HB-4486, As Passed House, February 8, 2018


  (8) Child abuse in the fourth degree is A CRIME PUNISHABLE AS

FOLLOWS:

Image result for Peter Lucido
"I need those Bills to pass to fund my
political career!"
     (A) FOR A FIRST OFFENSE, a misdemeanor punishable by

imprisonment for not more than 1 year.

     (B) FOR AN OFFENSE FOLLOWING A PRIOR CONVICTION, A FELONY


     (11) IF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY INTENDS TO SEEK AN ENHANCED

SENTENCE BASED UPON THE DEFENDANT HAVING 1 OR MORE PRIOR

CONVICTIONS, THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY SHALL INCLUDE ON THE

A fan asked me to take a look at two Michigan House Bills, 4486 and tie barred 4487, so I did.
COMPLAINT AND INFORMATION A STATEMENT LISTING THE PRIOR CONVICTION


OR CONVICTIONS. THE EXISTENCE OF THE DEFENDANT'S PRIOR CONVICTION

OR CONVICTIONS MUST BE DETERMINED BY THE COURT, WITHOUT A JURY, AT

SENTENCING OR AT A SEPARATE HEARING FOR THAT PURPOSE BEFORE

SENTENCING. THE EXISTENCE OF A PRIOR CONVICTION MAY BE ESTABLISHED

BY ANY EVIDENCE RELEVANT FOR THAT PURPOSE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT

LIMITED TO, 1 OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:

     (A) A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION.

     (B) A TRANSCRIPT OF A PRIOR TRIAL, PLEA-TAKING, OR SENTENCING.

     (C) INFORMATION CONTAINED IN A PRESENTENCE REPORT.

     (D) THE DEFENDANT'S STATEMENT.

     (12) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, "PRIOR CONVICTION" MEANS A

VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION OR A VIOLATION OF A LAW OF ANOTHER STATE

SUBSTANTIALLY CORRESPONDING TO THIS SECTION.


I became a bit alarmed at this point because of two items in the language of the Bills.

A "prior conviction", which is so obfuscated with the entire idea of this being a prejudicial assumption that the person was convicted under Michigan's Moral Turpitude Law in child welfare.

I can smell the stench of the imperialistic morality paraders kilometers away, so I go look into the definition of fourth degree child abuse.

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)Act 328 of 1931

750.136b Definitions; child abuse; degrees; penalties; exception; affirmative defense.
(7) A person is guilty of child abuse in the fourth degree if any of the following apply:
     (a) The person's omission or reckless act causes physical harm to a child.
     (b) The person knowingly or intentionally commits an act that under the circumstances poses an unreasonable risk of harm or injury to a child, regardless of whether physical harm results. 
(8) Child abuse in the fourth degree is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year.

This is a more intuitive understanding of fourth degree child abuse conviction from a Michigan law firm:
Fourth-degree child abuse. A parent or guardian who willfully fails to provide a child's basic needs (food, shelter, clothing), who abandons a child, or commits a reckless act which results in some physical harm to a child may be charged with fourth-degree child abuse.
"Failure to provide for the necessary needs of the child" is falls under multple types of abuses contained within federal law such as ecomonic abuse, environmental abuse, moral abuse, lack of medical care, having been reliant upon the state to protect the best interests of the child.

Poverty is the crime of failure to provide for the necessary needs of the child, having then to default on the grant of custody and guardianship from the state, triggering the penal conviction which produces a judicial determination which is needed to open the federal funding spigot in Medicaid, Title IV-B and E.

Tah dah!

Poverty is a crime because the state can make more money off the kid through federal funding schemes in fraudulent billing of privatized NGOs.

In furtherance to the fact that poverty has been codified as the crime of child abuse, these "prior convictions" are not criminal, which means there is no due process, allowing the court to hold secret administrative, closed door, tribunals to determine how long the next decree of conviction shall be for still hailing from the targeted population of "The Poors".

But, before I assign my favorite, most endearing sobriquet upon the Michigan law maker who introduced this bill, I thought I would be a bit iterative and do a few deep dives just to make sure I was parsimonious with my convictions, so I found this:

Lawmaker wants no repeat of Sanilac County rapist and child custody case

LANSING — A mid-Michigan lawmaker wants to make sure the controversial case of a man getting and then losing custody of the child that was conceived when he raped a 12-year old never happens again.

State Rep. Pam Faris, D-Clio, introduced a bill last week that would prohibit people who are convicted of third-degree criminal sexual conduct from getting custody of a child that is the product of an assault.

The bill came about after a Sanilac County judge gave twice-convicted rapist, Christopher Mirasolo joint custody of an 8-year-old boy he fathered with a 12-year-old girl in 2008.

The order, which came about because the mother was looking for child support from the father, caused an uproar in the community and caused the judge, who wasn't aware of the rape conviction when he signed the order, to reexamine the case and rescind his order.


Even though the case has been resolved and the mother will continue with sole legal custody of the child, Faris said, she doesn't want the same thing to happen to anyone else.

"This particular case fell through a lot of holes in a lot of different systems and ended up being a nightmare for this young lady and her family," Faris said. "We really don't want rapists who plead down to a lesser crime to have custody or visitation. This bill is for victims in the future. Everyone has seen the error of their ways in this case, but this woman has gone through three weeks of hell."

I see what is going on here.

This was one of those NGO opportunistic over night think tank of "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) who came up with a way to make some money from a tragedy, using kids, so I did another deep dive.

House Bill No. 5115

October 17, 2017, Introduced by Reps. Lucido, Marino, Canfield, Webber, Lasinski, Frederick, Chirkun, Bizon, LaGrand, Moss, Brinks, Camilleri, Wittenberg, Chang, Ellison, Green, Sabo, Liberati, Sneller, Sowerby, Pagan, Faris, Byrd, Yaroch, Scott, Hammoud, Geiss, Elder, Greimel, Zemke, Hertel, Yanez, Jones, Rabhi and Robinson and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

 SEC. 3107C. A PHYSICIAN, HOSPITAL, CLINIC, OR OTHER MEDICAL

INSTITUTION, OR OTHER PERSON, THAT PROVIDES A PRODUCT, SERVICE, OR

ACCOMMODATION FOR AN INJURED PERSON'S CARE, RECOVERY, OR

REHABILITATION IS ENTITLED TO PAYMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTION

INSURANCE BENEFITS UNDER THIS CHAPTER ON BEHALF OF THE INJURED

PERSON.

It was at this moment I saw the model begin to emerge from the propaganda.

By enriching law to terminate parental rights, the state can then directly receive funding for providing for the best interests of the child through Medicaid, and then securing life insurance of the child under the aegis of the state to "cash in" at the most opportune attrition, whether by death, AWOL, or age out, all in the best interests of the child.

What a great way to invest in children for a profitable return in social impact bonds!

I bet that Medicaid money will be going through the Michigan Children's Trust Fund.


"I wonder what Michigan does with all that money considering the Trust Fund 
is under the purview of the State Auditor right about now."

I have always wondered if these NGO Public Private Partnerships take out multiple life insurance policies and annuities on kids.


EmancipationDid you know that mechanisms I have identified for poverty being a crime and the right of the state issue such penal conviction through ex parte hearings, without opportunity of facing one's accuser, being tried as guilty until proven innocent, through administrative determination, is all legal and is something I like to call the 13th Exception.
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction".

Then there is the second part of the 13 Exception:

"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
Welcome to the world of UCC1, foreign nationals, shell companies and off shore accounts in child welfare.

If the principal agent, who is typically an attorney, is representing a client who has incorporated as a foreign entity through states like Delaware, actually contracting within the States, representing foreign national private investments originating from Israel, (oops, did I just say that?) or a structured NGO which just so happens to be a private contractor of child welfare services in Michigan, or, in some instances, a State agency which has filed UCC1 under the jurisdiction of international law, re-written for more privatization, there is nothing unethical nor illegal with criminalizing poverty, then of stealin' kids to make money, because indentured servitude, where the child can be emancipated at 16 or age out at 18 - 25 years of age. and slavery has nothing to do with the color of one's skin.

Ok, now you can take a breather.  That was a long one!  You should really see me do it as a stand up castigation routine.

The 13th Amendment is where the principal-agent theories warehoused under employment law, based upon law of chattels, or rather property law, including intellectual properties is all about who is the proper possessor of the "best interests" of think about that.

There are no appeals as the child abuse conviction proceedings have no parallel jurisprudence and one is placed on the State's Central Registry of Abuse before even being served with a court date because there are no indictments.

Child welfare convictions make "duly convicted" a judicial determination made behind a closed, administrative doors of the Public Private Partnerships.

Membership into the highly, non-exclusive club called "The Poors" (always said with clinched teeth) is an act of civility, in a christian nation.

Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever. Leviticus 25:44-46.

FINDINGS:  Peter Lucindo sucks and this is nothing but a real time construction for poor kids to be legally kidnapped and launch of another multi-billion dollar fraud scheme using the 13th Exception.


CHILD ABUSE: ENHANCED SENTENCE WITH
PRIOR CONVICTION
House Bill 4487 reported from committee as substitute H-2
Sponsor:  Rep. Peter J. Lucido
Committee:  Law and Justice
Complete to 12-28-17
BRIEF SUMMARY:  House Bill 4486 would amend the Michigan Penal Code to create enhanced penalties for second-, third-, or fourth-degree child abuse when the individual convicted of that crime has a prior conviction for child abuse in any degree. House Bill 4487 would place the new penalties within the sentencing guidelines. The bills would take effect 90 days after enactment.
FISCAL IMPACT:  House Bill 4486 would have an indeterminate fiscal impact on state and local units of government (see Fiscal Information, below, for a more detailed discussion).
THE APPARENT PROBLEM:
Currently, except for repeat second-degree child abuse violations, no matter how many times the same person commits an act constituting child abuse, the same penalty applies. Some feel, however, that if a person commits a second act, or a third, or more, the subsequent convictions should carry a higher penalty. One incident, they reason, may be an unfortunate mistake or may lead to a person’s getting help for a problem that played a part in the wrongdoing. But when the same person either deliberately hurts a child again or continues to engage in conduct that puts a child at risk of harm, he or she should face a harsher criminal sentence.

THE CONTENT OF THE BILL:
Under current law, a person is guilty of second-degree child abuse if the person’s omission or reckless act causes serious physical or mental harm to a child; if the person knowingly or intentionally commits an act that is cruel to a child or that is likely to cause serious physical or mental harm to a child, regardless of whether harm results; or if the person intentionally violates a licensing rule for family and group child care homes under Public Act 116 of 1973 and the violation causes the death of a child. A violation is a felony punishable by up to 10 years’ imprisonment for a first offense and up to 20 years’ imprisonment for a second or subsequent offense.
A person is guilty of third-degree child abuse if the person knowingly or intentionally causes physical harm to a child or knowingly or intentionally commits an act that poses an unreasonable risk of harm or injury to a child and that results in physical harm to a child. A violation is a felony punishable by up to 2 years’ imprisonment. 
A person is guilty of fourth-degree child abuse if the person’s omission or reckless act causes physical harm to a child or the person knowingly or intentionally commits an act that poses an unreasonable risk of harm or injury to a child, regardless of whether physical harm results. A violation is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year’s imprisonment.
House Bill 4486 would increase the sentence that can be imposed for second-, third-, or fourth-degree child abuse if the person convicted for that crime has a prior conviction. Under the bill, “prior conviction” would mean a violation of the child abuse law (i.e., child abuse in any degree) or violation of a law of another state that substantially corresponds to the child abuse law. (The penalty for first-degree child abuse is not increased for repeat offenders under the bill because it is currently life or any term of years.)
Under the bill, second-degree child abuse with a prior conviction for child abuse in any degree would be a felony punishable by imprisonment for up to 20 years; third-degree child abuse with a prior conviction would be a felony punishable by imprisonment for up to 5 years; and fourth-degree child abuse with a prior conviction would be a felony punishable by imprisonment for up to 2 years. The bill would not change the penalty for a first violation of any of these crimes.
The bill would require a prosecutor seeking an enhanced sentence for a defendant who has 1 or more prior convictions to include on the complaint and information a statement listing the prior conviction or convictions. The court would determine, without a jury, the existence of the defendant’s prior conviction or convictions either at sentencing or at a separate hearing before sentencing. The court would base its determination on any relevant evidence, which could include a copy of the judgment of conviction; a transcript of a prior trial, plea-taking, or sentencing; information contained in a presentence report; or the defendant’s statement.
MCL 750.136b
House Bill 4487 would place the new felony penalties for third- and fourth-degree child abuse with a prior conviction within the sentencing guidelines portion of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The bill also specifies that the current penalty for repeat second-degree child abuse offenses would apply to second-degree child abuse with any prior conviction, and that the current penalty for third-degree child abuse would apply only to a first offense.
HB 4487 is tie-barred to House Bill 4486, meaning that it cannot take effect unless House Bill 4486 is also enacted.
MCL 777.16g
FISCAL INFORMATION:
House Bill 4486 would have an indeterminate fiscal impact on state and local correctional systems and on local courts. The number of people who would be convicted under provisions of the bill is unknown. The bill would likely decrease misdemeanor convictions and increase felony convictions as violations of fourth-degree child abuse shift from misdemeanors to felonies when there is a prior conviction. The bill could also result in increased sentences for second-degree and third-degree child abuse with a prior conviction.
Felony convictions would result in increased costs related to state prisons and state probation supervision. In fiscal year 2016, the average cost of prison incarceration in a state facility was roughly $36,000 per prisoner, a figure that includes various fixed administrative and operational costs. State costs for parole and felony probation supervision averaged about $3,500 per supervised offender in the same year. 
By comparison, misdemeanor convictions increase costs related to county jails and/or local misdemeanor probation supervision. The costs of local incarceration in a county jail and local misdemeanor probation supervision vary by jurisdiction. The fiscal impact on local courts would depend on how provisions of the bill affected caseloads and related administrative costs. 
House Bill 4487 amends sentencing guidelines and would not have a direct fiscal impact on the state or on local units of government. 
ARGUMENTS:
For:
Sometimes a person does a bad thing only once.  Through counseling, education, maturity, or even serving a criminal penalty, many are rehabilitated and never do that or any other bad thing again. For some crimes, especially ones that result or could result in serious injury to another person, a more stringent penalty for repeat offenses can distinguish between someone who made a mistake and someone who poses an ongoing danger to others. Some feel that the criminal penalty should be harsher for a person who commits child abuse after being convicted of the crime previously. House Bill 4486 would do just that. A prosecutor would still retain discretion over which charges to bring and judges, under the guidance of the sentencing guidelines, would retain discretion over an appropriate sentence.
Against:
No arguments were offered in opposition to the bill.
POSITIONS:
The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan (PAAM) indicated support for the bills on 10-24-17 and 10-31-17.
                                                                                        Legislative Analysts:   Rick Yuille
                                                                                                                           Susan Stutzky
                                                                                                 Fiscal Analyst:   Robin Risko

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, December 15, 2017

In Honor Of My 1,000,000th PageView, We Celebrate Child Welfare In Unveiling The Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution

Quaestiones morales
Since Google metrics were available to monitor my pageviews, I have officially exceeded 1,000,000
pageviews, today.

I wish to thank the individual(s) who was kind enough to reaffirm my research in child welfare fraud by sending me this ancient, Christian codex.

I would also like to express by gratitude to each and every individual, and institution, who perpetuates the residuals of the peculiar insitution in profiting from human trafficking child welfare through public corruption, in the name of the tax exempt God.

I do what I do to preserve the annals of history, for they have been manipulated and destroyed for centuries, even to this day.

The truth shall be revealed for I am the original source.

Godspeed until my 2,000,000th pageview.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, October 21, 2017

Prison Labor, 13th Amendment, Political Campaigns & Child Welfare

Did you ever wonder why privatization of prisons is so popular amongst political candidates?

Prison labor!

Prision labor is legal and it is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, 13th Amendment.
Image result for good deal

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. 

Section 2 is the privatization clause.

How did this all slip past us for generations?

Well, it it is due to the fact that no one cares about the children, as the policies all originated in child welfare.

It goes like this.

A corporation increases profit margins using slave labor, then writes off the profit in tax exempt donations to a non-profit, a child welfare NGO, to funnel the money into political campaigns as contributions, and whatever is leftover in the NGO, await its profitable returns through social impact investments which use tax payer dollars.

Oh, those job creators!


So, if you need a job, just go to prison.

Prison labour is a billion-dollar industry, with uncertain returns for inmates

Prison labour is legally required in America. Most convicted inmates either work for nothing or for pennies at menial tasks that seem unlikely to boost their job prospects. At the federal level, the Bureau of Prisons operates a programme known as Federal Prison Industries that pays inmates roughly $0.90 an hour to produce everything from mattresses, spectacles,road signs and body armour for other government agencies, earning $500m in sales in fiscal 2016.

The full list of companies implicated in exploiting prison labor includes:

Bank of America;   Bayer;   Cargill;   Caterpillar;   Chevron;   Chrysler;   Costco;   John Deere;   Eli Lilly and Company;   Exxon Mobil;   GlaxoSmithKline;   Johnson and Johnson;   K-Mart;   Koch Industries;   McDonald’s;   Merck;   Microsoft ;Motorola;    Nintendo;   Pfizer;   Procter & Gamble;   Pepsi;   ConAgra Foods;   Shell;    Starbucks;   UPS;   Verizon;   WalMart;   Wendy’s.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Steve Scalise, Human Trafficking, Child Welfare & Slavery

Human trafficking is a scourge upon the entire existence of humanity that has continued as a modern interpretation of the "peculiar institution".

Human trafficking is slavery, which has never, ever gone away.

It was just refashioned to be trendy by coining the term "privatization".

U.S. Representative Steve Scalise is one of the few who possesses the bravery of spirit of civil rights, inclusive of human rights.

The child welfare system is human trafficking, the residual of the peculiar institution of slavery.

I honor this man and his work because no one else has the will to step up to the plate.



WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congressman Steve Scalise (R-La.) today released the following statement regarding House passage of International Megan’s Law to Prevent Child Exploitation and Other Sexual Crimes Through Advanced Notification of Traveling Sex Offenders (H.R. 515), and the Trafficking Prevention in Foreign Affairs Contracting Act (H.R. 400). Both are critical pieces of legislation to combat human trafficking.

“One of our greatest American values is our strong belief in the inherent worth of every human life. Human trafficking is a direct assault on this core value, and it affects millions of victims who need our help,” Rep. Scalise said. “Today’s bills by Chairman Royce and Rep. Smith are a strong step forward in combatting this abhorrent crime, providing protections, and ultimately justice to the victims of human trafficking.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, February 3, 2017

Day 103 - DynCorp Harvest, Killing Is Good Business

Soros Riots and Impeachment Talk, DynCorp Needed To Maintain Order?

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Attorney General Loretta Lynch and HHS Secretary Burwell Announce National Healthcare Fraud Takedown but Forgot Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare

If health care fraud is so rampant for adults and veterans, then, it is only logical to assume that Medicaid fraud in child welfare, also, exists.

If the States Medicaid Fraud Control Units are so pivotal in ending health care fraud, then why is it these units have absolutely no powers to address Medicaid fraud in child welfare, alone launch investigations.

So, according to HHS, the H.E.A.T. advanced analytics have assisted the DOJ to go after fraud, under the ACA.

Great.

Unfortunately, it looks like Medicaid fraud in child welfare will flourish for a few more years because the White House has only just came up with the idea to #HackFosterCare by making billing high tech and use data predictive models.

My question would be, "How can one externally observe the internal validity of billing if the industry of child welfare is secretive, by law, and privatized through contract.

TRICARE also has child welfare programs.

This was a $900 million take down of 300 individuals.  Child welfare is much larger.




National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in Charges against 301 Individuals for Approximately $900 Million in False Billing

Most Defendants Charged and Largest Alleged Loss Amount in Strike Force History
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell announced today an unprecedented nationwide sweep led by the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in 36 federal districts, resulting in criminal and civil charges against 301 individuals, including 61 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals, for their alleged participation in health care fraud schemes involving approximately $900 million in false billings.  Twenty-three state Medicaid Fraud Control Units also participated in today’s arrests.  In addition, the HHS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is suspending payment to a number of providers using its suspension authority provided in the Affordable Care Act.  This coordinated takedown is the largest in history, both in terms of the number of defendants charged and loss amount.  
Attorney General Lynch and Secretary Burwell were joined in the announcement by Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, FBI Associate Deputy Director David Bowdich, Inspector General Daniel Levinson of the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG), Acting Director Dermot O’Reilly of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), and Deputy Administrator and Director of CMS Center for Program Integrity Shantanu Agrawal M.D.
The defendants announced today are charged with various health care fraud-related crimes, including conspiracy to commit health care fraud, violations of the anti-kickback statutes, money laundering and aggravated identity theft.  The charges are based on a variety of alleged fraud schemes involving various medical treatments and services, including home health care, psychotherapy, physical and occupational therapy, durable medical equipment (DME) and prescription drugs.  More than 60 of the defendants arrested are charged with fraud related to the Medicare prescription drug benefit program known as Part D, which is the fastest-growing component of the Medicare program overall.
“As this takedown should make clear, health care fraud is not an abstract violation or benign offense – It is a serious crime,” said Attorney General Lynch.  “The wrongdoers that we pursue in these operations seek to use public funds for private enrichment.  They target real people – many of them in need of significant medical care.  They promise effective cures and therapies, but they provide none.  Above all, they abuse basic bonds of trust – between doctor and patient; between pharmacist and doctor; between taxpayer and government – and pervert them to their own ends.  The Department of Justice is determined to continue working to ensure that the American people know that their health care system works for them – and them alone.”
“Millions of seniors depend on Medicare for essential health coverage, and our action shows that this administration remains committed to cracking down on individuals who try to defraud the program,” said Secretary Burwell.  “We are continuing to put new tools and additional resources to work, including $350 million from the Affordable Care Act, for health care fraud prevention and enforcement efforts.  Thanks to the hard work of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, we are making progress in addressing and deterring fraud and delivering results to help ensure Medicare remains strong for years to come.”
According to court documents, the defendants allegedly participated in schemes to submit claims to Medicare and Medicaid for treatments that were medically unnecessary and often never provided.  In many cases, patient recruiters, Medicare beneficiaries and other co-conspirators were allegedly paid cash kickbacks in return for supplying beneficiary information to providers, so that the providers could then submit fraudulent bills to Medicare for services that were medically unnecessary or never performed.  Collectively, the doctors, nurses, licensed medical professionals, health care company owners and others charged are accused of submitting a total of approximately $900 million in fraudulent billing.
“The Medicare Fraud Strike Force is a model of 21st-Century data-driven law enforcement, and it has had a remarkable impact on health care fraud across the country,” said Assistant Attorney General Caldwell.  “As the cases announced today demonstrate, the Strike Force’s strategic approach keeps us a step ahead of emerging fraud trends, including drug diversion, and fraud involving compounded medications and hospice care.”
“These criminals target the most vulnerable in our society by taking money away from the care of the elderly, children and disabled,” said Associate Deputy Director Bowdich.  “The FBI is committed to working with our partners and the public to stop fraud and ensure that healthcare dollars are used to help the sick, and not line the pockets of criminals.”
“While it is impossible to accurately pinpoint the true cost of fraud in federal health care programs, fraud is a significant threat to the programs’ stability and endangers access to health care services for millions of Americans,” said Inspector General Levinson.  “As members of the joint Strike Force, OIG will continue to play a vital role in tracking down these criminals and seeing that justice is done.”
“DCIS, in partnership with our fellow federal investigative agencies, will continue to uncompromisingly investigate and bring to justice the people who perpetrate these criminal acts,” said Acting Director O’Reilly. “Their actions threaten to cripple our vital national health care industry, and place our citizenry at risk.  We will remain vigilant.”
“Taxpayers and Congress provided CMS with resources to adopt powerful monitoring systems that fight fraud, safeguard program dollars, and protect Medicare and Medicaid,” said Deputy Administrator and Center for Program Integrity Director Agrawal.  “The diligent use of innovative data analytic systems has contributed or led directly to many of the law enforcement cases presented here today.  CMS is committed to its collaboration with these agencies to keep federally-funded health care programs safe and strong for all Americans.”
The Medicare Fraud Strike Force operations are part of the Health Care Fraud Prevention & Enforcement Action Team (HEAT), a joint initiative announced in May 2009 between the Department of Justice and HHS to focus their efforts to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country.  The Medicare Fraud Strike Force operates in nine locations and since its inception in March 2007 has charged over 2,900 defendants who collectively have falsely billed the Medicare program for over $8.9 billion. 
Including today’s enforcement actions, nearly 1,200 individuals have been charged in national takedown operations, which have involved more than $3.4 billion in fraudulent billings.  Today’s announcement marks the second time that districts outside of Strike Force locations participated in a national takedown, and they accounted for 82 defendants charged in this takedown.
*********
For the Strike Force locations, in the Southern District of Florida, a total of 100 defendants were charged with offenses relating to their participation in various fraud schemes involving approximately $220 million in false billings for home health care, mental health services and pharmacy fraud.  In one case, nine defendants have been charged with operating six different Miami-area home health companies for the purpose of submitting false and fraudulent claims to Medicare, including for services that were not medically necessary and that were based on bribes and kickbacks.  In total, Medicare paid the six companies over $24 million as a result of the scheme.
In the Southern District of Texas, 24 individuals were charged in cases involving over $146 million in alleged fraud.  One of these defendants is a physician with the highest number of referrals for home health services in the Southern District of Texas.  This physician has been charged with participating in separate schemes to bill Medicare for medically unnecessary home health services that were often not provided.  Numerous companies that submitted claims to Medicare using the fraudulent home health referrals from the physician were paid over $38 million by Medicare.
In the Northern District of Texas, 11 people were charged in cases involving over $47 million in alleged fraud.  In one scheme, a physician allowed unlicensed individuals to perform physician services and then billed Medicare as if he performed them.  Additionally, the physician certified patients for home health care that was often medically unnecessary.  Home health companies submitted approximately $23.3 million in billings to Medicare based on the physician’s fraudulent certifications.    
In the Central District of California, 22 defendants were charged for their roles in schemes to defraud Medicare of approximately $162 million.  In one case, a doctor was charged with causing almost $12 million in losses to Medicare through his own fraudulent billing, including performing medically unnecessary vein ablation procedures on Medicare beneficiaries.  
In the Eastern District of Michigan, 19 defendants face charges for their alleged roles in fraud, kickback, money laundering and drug distribution schemes involving approximately $114 million in false claims for services that were medically unnecessary or never rendered.  Among these are owners of a physical therapy clinic who lured patients through the payment of cash kickbacks and medically unnecessary prescriptions for Schedule II medications for the purpose of stealing more than $36 million from Medicare.   
In Tampa, Orlando and elsewhere in the Middle District of Florida, 15 individuals were charged with participating in a variety of schemes including compounding pharmacy fraud and intravenous prescription drug fraud involving $17 million in fraudulent billing.  In one case, the owner of several infusion clinics allegedly defrauded the Medicare program of over $8 million through a scheme involving reimbursement claims for expensive intravenous prescription drugs that were never purchased and never administered to patients.
In the Northern District of Illinois, six individuals were charged in cases related to three different schemes involving bribery and false and fraudulent claims for home health services and disability benefits.  The charged defendants include individuals who owned or co-owned the fraudulent providers and a medical doctor.  In total, these schemes resulted in over $12 million being paid to the defendants and their companies. 
In the Eastern District of New York, 10 individuals were charged in six different cases, including five individuals who were charged for their roles in a scheme involving over $86 million in physical and occupational therapy claims to Medicare and Medicaid.  In that case, the defendants are alleged to have filled a network of Brooklyn clinics that they controlled with patients by paying bribes and kickbacks.  Once at the clinics, these patients were subjected to medically unnecessary therapy.  The defendants then laundered the proceeds of the fraud through over a dozen shell companies. 
In the Eastern District of Louisiana, three defendants were charged in connection with a health care fraud and wire fraud conspiracy involving a defunct home health care provider.  This scheme centered on the payment of kickbacks through patient recruiters in exchange for patients who oftentimes never received nor qualified for home health care as billed.  Once admitted, patient medical records were routinely fabricated and altered to support false and fraudulent claims to Medicare.
*********
In addition to the Strike Force, today’s enforcement actions include cases brought by 26 U.S. Attorney’s Offices, including the unsealing of search warrants in investigations being conducted by the Eastern District of North Carolina, Southern District of Georgia, District of Columbia, Eastern District of Texas, Southern District of West Virginia, Middle District of Louisiana, District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of Alabama.
In the Northern District of Georgia, nine defendants were charged for their roles in two health care fraud schemes involving $7 million in fraudulent billings.  Eight defendants were charged in a scheme where bribes and kickbacks were allegedly paid to a state of Georgia official in exchange for falsifying applications and licensing requirements and recommending the approval of unqualified mental health providers.
In the Middle District of Alabama, two defendants were charged for their roles in a mental health services scheme allegedly involving $246,000 in fraudulent billings.
In the Middle District of Tennessee, a doctor was charged for his role in an illegal kickback scheme under which he allegedly referred patients to a certain DME supplier in exchange for cash kickbacks.
In the Western District of Kentucky, a business entity was charged for its role in a health care fraud scheme.
In the Southern District of Ohio, two defendants were charged for their roles in a $7.5 million home healthcare fraud scheme.
In the Western and Eastern Districts of Pennsylvania, three defendants were charged for their roles in drug diversion and embezzlement schemes.
In the Southern District of New York, a pharmacist was charged for his role in a scheme involving over $51 million in fraudulent Medicare and Medicaid billings. 
In the Districts of Maine, Alaska, Kansas, Connecticut and Vermont, five defendants were charged for their roles in Medicaid-related schemes.
In the Eastern District of Missouri, four defendants, including a doctor and pharmacist, were charged for their roles in schemes involving over $3 million in billings.
In the Southern District of California, eight individuals were charged in health care-related cases.  In one case, five individuals, including a doctor and a pharmacist, were charged in a scheme to pay bribes and kickbacks to doctors in exchange for prescribing expensive durable medical equipment and compound pain creams that were not medically necessary.  The indictment alleges that approximately $27 million in false and fraudulent claims were submitted to insurers.
In the District of New Mexico, two defendants were charged for their roles in a Medicaid fraud scheme.
In the Northern District of Iowa, a settlement agreement was reached with a corporate entity for its role in a health care fraud scheme in a juvenile residential treatment facility.
In the District of Oregon, one defendant was charged for his role in a $1.7 million optometry services scheme.
In the District of Puerto Rico, civil demand letters were issued to six individuals for their roles in a scheme to defraud the Medicaid program.
In addition, in the states of Florida, Iowa, South Dakota, Indiana, New York, Michigan, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Oregon, Kentucky and Alaska, 49 defendants have been charged in criminal and civil actions with defrauding the Medicaid program and 57 sites were searched, pursuant to search warrants.  These cases were investigated by each state’s respective Medicaid Fraud Control Units. 
The cases announced today are being prosecuted and investigated by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices nationwide, along with Medicare Fraud Strike Force teams from the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and from the U.S. Attorney’s Offices of the Southern District of Florida, Eastern District of Michigan, Eastern District of New York, Southern District of Texas, Central District of California, Eastern District of Louisiana, Northern District of Texas, Northern District of Illinois and the Middle District of Florida; and agents from the FBI, HHS-OIG, Drug Enforcement Administration, DCIS and state Medicaid Fraud Control Units.
A complaint or indictment is merely a charge, and all defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
The court documents for each case will posted online, as they become available, here: https://www.justice.gov/opa/documents-and-resources-june-22-2016-medicare-fraud-strike-force-press-conference.
The Affordable Care Act has provided new tools and resources to fight fraud in federal health care programs.  The law provides an additional $350 million for health care fraud prevention and enforcement efforts, which has allowed the department to hire more prosecutors and the Strike Force to expand from two cities to nine.  The act also toughens sentencing for criminal activity, enhances provider and supplier screenings and enrollment requirements and encourages increased sharing of data across government.
In addition to providing new tools and resources to fight fraud, the Affordable Care Act clarified that for sentencing purposes, the loss is determined by the amount billed to Medicare and increased the sentencing guidelines for the billed amounts, which has provided a strong deterrent effect due to increased prison time, particularly in the most egregious cases.
Since January 2009, the Justice Department’s Civil Division, along with U.S. Attorney’s Offices around the country, has recovered a total of more than $29.9 billion through False Claims Act cases, with more than $18.3 billion of that amount recovered in cases involving fraud against federal health care programs.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©