BREAKING NEWS: Perkins Coie & Detroit Land Bank Authority Still Suck

If you have been following my series on why Perkins Coie Sucks, you should be well aware of the fact that I am not a fan of those people in Perkins Coie.

What Do Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie, Russia, FBI And Child Welfare Have In Common?

I will be going into detail on the history of why Perkins Coie sucks, but I would prefer to wait to tell my tale in the proper jurisdiction.

Just so you understand that this is a long story, Perkins Coie sucks because it did not just set up the Detroit Land Bank Authority for the Clinton Foundation so Bill could launder those TARP slush funds to one of his shell companies in Costa Rica, it was very, very mean to my Sweetie.

Saddy face.

UNSEALED: Fusion GPS Bank Records Show Russia-Related Payments

The following was published February 18, 2016.

Perkins Coie Serves as General Counsel to Community Reinvestment Fund in Financing of $42 Million Detroit Home Mortgage Program to Develop Detroit’s Neighborhoods

02.18.2016

Innovative Venture Evolved from Clinton Global Initiative and the Obama Administration’s Detroit Federal Working Group

CHICAGO, Ill. (February 18, 2016) - Perkins Coie served as general counsel to Community Reinvestment Fund, USA (CRF), a national non-profit community development financial institution and a leader in bringing capital to underserved areas, in the development of Detroit Home Mortgage, an innovative new program introduced today to make Detroit home buying easier. Detroit Home Mortgage Fund is a $42 million funded mortgage program to help solve Detroit’s appraisal gap problem. Banks will now be able to lend qualified homebuyers the full amount needed to purchase a renovated home, or to buy and rehabilitate homes anywhere in the city of Detroit.

Detroit Home Mortgage was developed in collaboration with Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan, the Obama Administration’s Detroit Federal Working Group, the Clinton Global Initiative, local banks, foundations and nonprofits. Additional grants to CRF in support for the program include $6 million from The Kresge Foundation, $6 million from the Michigan State Housing Development Authority and operating support from the Ford Foundation and The Kresge Foundation. CRF is the sole owner/manager of the Detroit Home Mortgage Fund which evolved out of the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) meeting in the summer of 2015 and announced as a new CGI Commitment to Action.

Perkins Coie served as general counsel to CRF in connection with all aspects of the Detroit Home Mortgage Program, including the formation of the Fund and all program implementation documents.

The Perkins Coie team was led by Chicago partner Bruce Bonjour and included Chicago partners Ed Wicks and Richard Peterson; Dallas partner Craig Lackey and Washington, D.C. partner Jesse Kanach.

Click here to read the CRF press release.

Click here to learn more about Detroit Home Mortgage.

U.S. v Prevezon Et Al. Complaint by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Perkins Coie's SEC Money Laundering Trust Fund Emolument Fraud Scheme

To begin, allow me to refresh the memories of our readers:

#perkinscoiesucks

Now, that we have that out of the way, the Securities and Exchange Commission has released its most recent report on the Perkins Coie Trust Fund, but do you still wonder why Perkins Coie Sucks?

I never include the "g".

Well, there is this thing in the U.S. Constitution called the Emoluments Clause.

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatsoever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

There is also this thing called the Hatch Act.

The Hatch Act of 1939, officially An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits  in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice-president, and certain designated high-level officials

^[1] from engaging in some forms of political activity. It went into law on August 2, 1939.

In essence, these two mechanisms are to prevent individuals who formally hold officies, including their spouses, not to take bribes or use information gained from their positions for personal inurement.

TRANSLATION: STOP STEALIN' FROM THE NATIONAL TREASURY!!!

Well, it seems Perkins Coie has found a loophole for, not just Members of Congress, but for the Democratic National Committee Members.

See, the scam works like this:

"The Elected Ones" pump out propaganda to push through legislation to fund their fraud schemes like TARP.

Once the funding is appropriated to unincorporated fraud schemes like Detroit Land Bank Authority, which "The Legal Genuises" (trademark pending) of Perkins Coie set up, they turn around and get paid in creative attorney fees, then invest in their Trust Funds.

The Perkins Coie Trust Funds are a special breed of trust funds because they fall under employee trusts, which has not been amended for quite some time.

I previously covered this because trust fund laws are arcane and were created as part of the peculiar institution.

Anyway, since a Member of Congress is not supposed to engage in personal inurement of office, there is nothing that says they are prohibited from creating trust funds which will substantially benefit from legislation or propaganda policies a Member promulgates.

For instance, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Debbie Wasserman Schultz or John Podesta, DNC head honchos, tell Perkins Coie, attorney-client privilege, that there is a big money scheme they set up, ready to be grabbed, like the Detroit Land Bank Authority.

Then, they "pay consultation fees" to Perkins Coie for setting it up through fees paid through the campaigns, where the TARP money they ripped off was funneled through NGOs like, perhaps, just saying, not really sure, just off the top of my head, the Clinton Foundation, or by whatever flavor of the week they call themselves.

Then, Perkins Coie hedges through their Trust Fund that, more than likely, these public officials  through their trust funds, are all connected because a trust fund is separate and distinct from the person, or, in this instance, the public official, and their spouses.

As you will see, below, I took my top SEC Perkins Coie picks of investments, which are the antithesis of the entire Democratic Party platform.

Seriously.

You have pharmaceutical corporations that have been hit with massive civil fines for fraud, but still ended up churning out a profit because it is cheaper to pay the regulatory fine than for the DOJ or SEC to actually do their jobs.

Then they contribute the ill gotten gains to political campaigns.

You will find all the social media companies that were "allegedgly" not hacked like Facebook, Yahoo and Twitter, to throw the 2018 Presidential General Election.

Salesforce is one of Pelosi's pets and her trust fund is in her her husband's name, (That is another tale.  Hold on.)

Then, there are lots of privatized military contractors, which means if Perkins Coie does not help its clients, who just so happen to be Democratic Members of Congress, to push the U.S. into more fake wars, everyone will lose money.

The same scenario applies to health care, which is probably why Perkins Coie Trust cut some of its health care holdings.

In short, Perkins Coie Trust is a money laundering operation for the DNC, Clinton Foundation and Detroit Land Bank Authority, and, considering the fact that it is a trust, and trusts fall under the scope of the Emoluments Clause, and considering the fact that the Attorney General Sessions has ramped up asset forfeitures in criminal activities, well, guess what, trust funds fall right up under this category, quite nicely.

Get 'em #Superfans.

Perkins Coie Trust Company Has Cut Its Unitedhealth Group (UNH) Holding; Atlas Financial Holdings (AFH) Sentiment Is 1.76

February 2, 2018 - By Hazel Jackson

Perkins Coie Trust Company decreased Unitedhealth Group Inc (UNH) stake by 12.84% reported in 2017Q3 SEC filing. Perkins Coie Trust Company sold 2,289 shares as Unitedhealth Group Inc (UNH)’s stock rose 9.50%. The Perkins Coie Trust Company holds 15,532 shares with $3.04M value, down from 17,821 last quarter. Unitedhealth Group Inc now has $227.94 billion valuation. The stock decreased 0.66% or $1.56 during the last trading session, reaching $235.22. About 4.27 million shares traded or 38.22% up from the average. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) has risen 32.76% since February 2, 2017 and is uptrending. It has outperformed by 16.06% the S&P500.

Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in underwriting commercial automobile insurance policies in the United States. The company has market cap of $237.61 million. The companyÂ’s automobile insurance products provide insurance coverage in three primary areas, including liability, accident benefits, and physical damage. It has a 148.12 P/E ratio. It focuses on the light commercial vehicle sector, including taxi cabs, non-emergency para-transit, limousine, livery, and business autos.

Among 26 analysts covering UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH), 26 have Buy rating, 0 Sell and 0 Hold. Therefore 100% are positive. UnitedHealth Group had 79 analyst reports since September 2, 2015 according to SRatingsIntel. The firm has “Overweight” rating given on Wednesday, June 7 by Morgan Stanley. On Wednesday, June 7 the stock rating was maintained by Cantor Fitzgerald with “Buy”. Mizuho upgraded it to “Buy” rating and $178 target in Wednesday, November 30 report. The rating was maintained by Cantor Fitzgerald with “Overweight” on Friday, April 7. Cowen & Co maintained UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) on Friday, January 12 with “Buy” rating. The rating was upgraded by Argus Research on Friday, July 22 to “Buy”. Vetr upgraded it to “Strong-Buy” rating and $128.77 target in Wednesday, September 2 report. The stock of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) earned “Buy” rating by Citigroup on Friday, October 2. Citigroup maintained the stock with “Buy” rating in Wednesday, July 19 report. The company was maintained on Tuesday, January 16 by Piper Jaffray.

Investors sentiment decreased to 0.91 in 2017 Q3. Its down 0.11, from 1.02 in 2017Q2. It is negative, as 46 investors sold UNH shares while 524 reduced holdings. 112 funds opened positions while 408 raised stakes. 810.94 million shares or 0.66% less from 816.36 million shares in 2017Q2 were reported. Alexandria Capital Llc accumulated 0.01% or 231 shares. Chicago Equity Partners Limited Co owns 76,005 shares for 0.47% of their portfolio. Westend Advisors reported 4.5% of its portfolio in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH). Braun Stacey Associates, a New York-based fund reported 87,999 shares. Fred Alger Mngmt reported 2.12% stake. Artemis Invest Mngmt Ltd Liability Partnership has invested 1.74% in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH). Lvm Capital Ltd Mi invested in 0.21% or 4,465 shares. Palouse Mgmt reported 1.53% stake. Goldman Sachs Group has invested 0.24% in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH). Fortaleza Asset Mgmt owns 2,070 shares for 0.74% of their portfolio. Moreover, Kcm Advsr Limited Company has 0.12% invested in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) for 9,975 shares. Ubs Asset Mgmt Americas has invested 0.8% in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH). Girard Partners Limited reported 35,049 shares. Murphy Pohlad Asset Ltd Liability Corp owns 9,877 shares or 1.34% of their US portfolio. Alliancebernstein LP reported 7.24 million shares or 1.06% of all its holdings.

Since August 3, 2017, it had 0 insider purchases, and 9 insider sales for $27.93 million activity. 50,574 shares were sold by RENFRO LARRY C, worth $10.02 million. Shares for $2.46M were sold by BALLARD WILLIAM C JR on Tuesday, January 23. WILENSKY GAIL R sold $1.12M worth of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) on Tuesday, September 5. 15,000 shares were sold by BURKE RICHARD T, worth $2.88 million on Monday, August 21. 198 shares valued at $48,025 were sold by Shine Kenneth Irwin on Friday, January 19. On Thursday, October 19 the insider ROOS THOMAS E sold $200,333.

Since January 1, 0001, it had 0 buys, and 20 insider sales for $1.86 million activity.

The stock decreased 1.50% or $0.3 during the last trading session, reaching $19.75. About 26,708 shares traded. Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. (AFH) has declined 15.27% since February 2, 2017 and is downtrending. It has underperformed by 31.97% the S&P500.

Analysts await Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:AFH) to report earnings on March, 12. They expect $0.32 earnings per share, up 114.10% or $2.59 from last year’s $-2.27 per share. AFH’s profit will be $3.85 million for 15.43 P/E if the $0.32 EPS becomes a reality. After $0.63 actual earnings per share reported by Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. for the previous quarter, Wall Street now forecasts -49.21% negative EPS growth.

The following are my picks of corporations that have been hit with DOJ civil settlement MOAs in fraud or just engage in questionable, really questionable, contractual activities with the federal government.

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
AT&T INC
ABBOTT LABS
BANK OF AMERICA CORP
BANK OF AMERICA CORP
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC
BLACKROCK INC
CELGENE CORP
ENBRIDGE INC.
EXXON MOBIL CORP
FACEBOOK INC
INTEL CORP
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO
LAS VEGAS SANDS
LILLY ELI & CO
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
MERCK & CO INC
MICROSOFT CORP
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP
NOVARTIS AG
PFIZER INC
POTLATCH CORPORATION
QUALCOMM INC
SALESFORCE.COM INC
SEATTLE GENETICS
TWITTER INC
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
VANGUARD
WAL-MART STORES INC
ZILLOW GROUP INC


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: Cenk Uyger Is Back And Successfully Failed To Mention That Perkins Coie Sucks

Cenk Uyger & John Conyers, Jr. waiting for something
other than cocktails & popcorn.

Cenk Uyger of The Young Turks is back and failed to mention that Perkins Coie Sucks.

Now, why would Cenk neglect to identify the funding keyman, Perkins Coie, having dropped all those big attorney names, to increase his youtube hits, who are clients?

Hmmmmm......

How come Cenk does not talk about Bob Bauer and Marc Elias, "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending)?

Hmmmm......

Hmmmm.......

How come Cenk did not mention Jeffrey Katzenberg or even Bob Bauer, two primary individuals behind their decision to "organize" with TYT?

Maybe because no one has figured out if the "organizing" was with Perkins Coie, or one of its clients like the DNC, DCCC, Hillary for America, or a number of other Super PACs, or even clients like Dreamworks.

Perhaps, Cenk forgot about the upcoming Senate Judiciary Hearings on why Perkins Coie Sucks?

Did TYT social media staff ignore the #perkinscoiesucks or any other form of the hash tag for Perkins Coie, intentionally, and if so, why?

Did TYT engage in any "financial" transactions on behalf of any political campaign activities of the DNC, DCCC, or Hillary for America, (sssshhhhh....it is all the same Corporate Shape Shifter.)?

I am going to ask Cenk if this is one of those "Attorney-Client Privilege" issues.

Former White House Counsel Bob Bauer Exits Perkins Coie

Bauer will devote more time to teaching at New York University School of Law. He will split his time between New York City and Washington, D.C.

By Ryan Lovelace |
May 17, 2018 at 01:11 PM

Bob Bauer, The Original "Legal Genius" (trademark pending)

Robert Bauer, the Democratic Party legal stalwart who served as White House counsel to President Barack Obama, is leaving Perkins Coie after nearly four decades at the firm.

The firm said Bauer will continue to represent several of his existing clients on an individual basis and will serve as co-counsel with Perkins Coie on some of those matters. Bauer will also devote more time to teaching at New York University School of Law.

Bauer was not immediately available to comment, but in a statement he expressed gratitude for his time at Perkins Coie and said he was eager to continue working with colleagues at the firm as a former partner.

“When I came out of law school in 1976, the country was just beginning to regulate the political process in a way that hadn’t been true before,” Bauer said. “At Perkins Coie, we built a practice and defined the field in a way that you just do not find at other law firms. I’m proud of the work we have accomplished, the team we have built and the clients we continue to serve.”

Bauer started at Perkins Coie in 1980, founding the firm’s political law practice. In the ensuing 38 years, he stepped away only twice—to serve as counsel to the Senate minority leader during former President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial of 1999, and when working as Obama’s White House counsel from 2010 through July 2011.

After leaving the firm, Perkins Coie said, Bauer will continue to write and split his time between New York City and Washington, D.C. He will also remain as personal counsel to Obama and continue working with The Obama Foundation and The Biden Foundation as clients.

Though Perkins Coie is headquartered in Seattle, it has an outsize presence in D.C. thanks to its leading political law practice. The group, known for its longtime work for the Democratic National Committee and other Democratic groups and politicians, has been chaired since 2009 by Marc Elias, who was counsel of record for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Perkins Coie has also attracted attention in recent months based on reports that the firm played a role in funding research by Fusion GPS that led to the “Steele dossier” proffering ties between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and the Kremlin.

Bauer has not been shy about commenting on controversies surrounding the Trump administration, including writing in support of former FBI director James Comey and arguing that Congress should enact legislation requiring special counsel Robert Mueller to issue a report to legislators if Mueller is fired by the president.

The following is from Wikileaks showing concerns with that "Attorney-Client Privilege".

Attorney Client Communication -- Superpac follow up

From:MElias@perkinscoie.com To: robbymook2015@gmail.com, d.cheng@me.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, Charlie.Baker@deweysquare.com, jesse@jesseferguson.com  CC: JBerkon@perkinscoie.com  Date: 2015-04-07 23:48 Subject: Attorney Client Communication -- Superpac follow up

Team – Per our conversation on Sunday, we have attached two draft policies dealing with the agency issue. The first would be the campaign’s. It sets forth HFA’s policy not to confer fundraising authority on any paid employee or consultant of a Super PAC that makes substantial expenditures in the presidential race. This would cover Priorities, Bridge, and WOMEN VOTE!, but would exclude Super PACs that occasionally dabble in the presidential race and social welfare orgs. The draft policy also spells out when an agent’s grant of agency terminates, in an effort to reduce the total number of fundraising agents floating out there at any given time. Finally, it codifies Charlie’s idea that the finance committee (as Dennis has currently explained it) is more of a recognition of work than a grant of additional authority. We’re still safer if we can avoid giving campaign fundraising titles to folks who are raising soft money for a Super PAC. But if that’s not possible with everyone, staking out this position now will be helpful. The second would be the Super PAC’s policy. Because the campaign cannot sanction the soliciting of soft money, the PAC needs to be the one spelling out the rules for individuals wearing “two hats” who want to raise soft money. However, we would condition any support we offer superpac on them adopting this policy. The goal is to create a uniform set of guidelines that, if followed, would help demonstrate to a regulator that the individual was raising soft money in a capacity other than the campaign’s agent. As we discussed, we may decide that some of our fundraising agents are too risky – either because we don’t trust them to follow these guidelines or because we do not think it is credible that they are raising in a capacity other than as a campaign agent – and tell Priorities that they cannot use them to raise. But this would be the uniform set of guidelines that we would insist everyone wearing “two hats” would follow. Lastly, we are still working on proposals to address the question of the role we can play re additional supporter/leadership for superpacs. We will be back shortly on that. -- Marc E. Elias Perkins Coie LLP 700 13th St, NW Washington, DC 20005 202-434-1609 (ph) 202-654-9126 (fax) melias@perkinscoie.com<mailto:melias@perkinscoie.com> ________________________________ NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.

The following is the policy brief attached to the email.

HILLARY FOR AMERICA POLICY ON FUNDRAISING AGENTS

Federal campaign law defines an “agent” as an individual who has been conferred actual authority by a candidate or campaign committee to solicit funds on its behalf (hereinafter, “fundraising authority”).  Hillary for America (“HFA”) may choose to confer such authority on certain individuals who are not employees.  The list of campaign fundraising agents could include individuals who agree to host sanctioned fundraising events on HFA’s behalf; individuals who offer to raise funds on HFA’s behalf and whose offer is accepted by HFA; and individuals whom HFA asks to raise funds on its behalf and who accept HFA’s offer.  Individuals who raise funds for HFA without the approval of HFA staff or individuals who raise funds for HFA in contravention of an instruction not to do so will not be considered agents of HFA, notwithstanding their representations to prospective donors or how those representations are understood.
The following rules will govern the campaign’s fundraising agents.  These are in addition to any policies conveyed by HFA to its agents in other documents or materials.
1.     HFA will not confer fundraising authority on any individual who is compensated (whether as an employee or a consultant) by a Super PAC that makes substantial expenditures to influence the presidential election.  Such individuals are not authorized to raise funds on HFA’s behalf.
2.     An individual’s fundraising authority expires on the earlier of the following: (1) when the fundraising agent informs HFA that s/he is terminating her/his fundraising agency; (2) when HFA informs the individual that it is terminating the individual’s fundraising agency; or (3) when the individual’s contemplated fundraising activity for HFA ends.  For example, when an individual has been conferred fundraising authority for a specific event, that authority terminates immediately after the event.  As another example, when an individual has been conferred authority to raise a specific amount of funds, that authority terminates immediately as soon as those funds are raised.
3.     HFA will have employees who are fundraisers.  At this time, HFA does not intend to retain consultants to raise funds nor does it intend to have volunteer fundraising positions (e.g. “National Finance Chair” or “Regional Finance Chair”). 
4.     HFA will recognize individuals who raise a certain amount of funds by placing them in honorary groups (e.g. “Finance Committee”).  Placement in these honorary groups does not suggest that the individual has any additional fundraising authority.  Moreover, there may be some individuals that remain in these honorary groups notwithstanding the fact that their fundraising agency has been terminated.

SUPER PAC POLICY ON FUNDRAISING AGENTS

Super PAC recognizes that it may designate an individual as a fundraising agent who is currently serving as a fundraising agent for a federal officeholder or candidate.  Federal law provides that an individual serving as a fundraising agent for a federal officeholder or candidate may legally raise funds outside of federal source restrictions and contribution limits, as long as the fundraising is not undertaken in that individual’s capacity as an agent for the federal officeholder or candidate.
The guidelines below govern fundraising activity by such individuals.  It does not apply to anyone other than these individuals.  It does not apply to individuals who were fundraising agents for a federal officeholder or candidate in the past, but have terminated that agency.  Such individuals would not be considered fundraising agents for a federal candidate or officeholder under federal law.  Super PAC encourages, though does not require, individuals who have ceased their fundraising activities for a federal officeholder or candidate to formally terminate their agency relationship with the officeholder or candidate prior to raising funds for the Super PAC.
1.     The individual may not use campaign resources (e.g. staff, facilities, donor lists, or campaign materials) while raising funds for the Super PAC. 
2.     The individual should not identify herself as being associated with the campaign while raising funds for the Super PAC.  For instance, if the individual has a fundraising title with the campaign or serves on an honorary committee, that should not be referenced while raising funds for the Super PAC. 
3.     The individual may not tell the prospective donor that s/he is soliciting funds on behalf of or at the request, suggestion, or direction of the candidate, a campaign staffer, or any campaign agent.  Nor should the individual suggest this through phrases such as, “It would mean a lot to Candidate for you to give to the Super PAC” or “I know that Candidate would appreciate it if you gave to the Super PAC.”
4.     When soliciting funds for the Super PAC, the individual must be clear that he or she is doing so on behalf of the Super PAC and not the campaign.  If the Super PAC has bestowed a fundraising title on the individual, he or she must use that title when soliciting for the Super PAC.  Likewise, if letters are sent to prospective Super PAC donors, they must be on Super PAC letterhead (or the donor’s personal letterhead); if emails are sent to prospective Super PAC donors, they must be from a Super PAC e-mail address (or a personal email address). 
5.     The individual may not solicit funds for the campaign and the Super PAC at the same time (e.g. in the same letter, phone call, e-mail, meeting, or event).
 The individual may not explicitly earmark funds specifically for use in the candidate’s race, though it is permissible for the individual to discuss the PAC’s support for the candidate as part of

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: Nunes Calls For House To Find Out Why Perkins Coie Sucks

"Look at them cringe. They really do not want to say his name,
yet have no choice but to give reverence."

Yes, that is correct.

Devin Nunes is calling upon Bob Goodlatte and Trey Gowdy to stand in unison to preserve the annals of history as to why Perkins Coie Sucks.

Of course, there are those who shall scoff at the proclamation of the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed that Perkins Coie Sucks.

I really do not care because Devin, Bob and Trey already know that Perkins Coie Sucks because I told them.

So, basically, the formal call of Nunes to probe the 42 Obama era anti-Trump activists is just one of those pro forma proceedings because the probe will be focused on two core items:

1.  How many other cockroaches scatter once the probe illuminates why Perkins Coie Sucks; and,
2. How badly they try to cover up the fact that Perkins Coie Sucks.

They refuse to believe that we already know what they did, how they did it, who they worked with, how much money was involved and how it was laundered.

I would be sorely disappointed if media attempts to spin this as an attack upon Democrats because Perkins Coie launched its most notable action upon someone who, dare I say, "used" to be considered an icon of the Democratic Party and who just so happened to be the one who formally requested the OIG investigation of the DOJ & FBI.

Then they attacked, Perkins Coie turned around and attacked Jim Jordan, the individual who would be picking up the mantle of impeachment hearings.

I bet this is going to make for awkward reporting in the media considering the fact that reporters and those in the social media sphere, are going to have a truly difficult time wrapping their heads around the fact that this has nothing to do with a partisan politics.

This has to do with ending stealin' of the children, the land and the votes.

I am going to make the world say his name, over and over and over again, as I sit back and sip on my glass of Merlot with a great big bowl of savory garlic buttered popcorn.

This is so romantic!

Go forth my humble servants, for the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed is getting kinda tired of biting her tongue.

#pekinscoiesucks

Nunes calls for House probe of 42 Obama-era anti-Trump activists

"We shall apostilize the proclamation of the
 Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed
that Perkins Coie Sucks."

Rep. Devin Nunes is referring 42 Obama administration officials, FBI agents and outside political activists to a House task force for an investigation into how the Obama Justice Department targeted the Donald Trump campaign.

If the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and Judiciary Committee agree, their task force would conduct the most extensive probe to date on anti-Trump government operations in 2016.

Mr. Nunes, Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, has sent letters to Oversight head Trey Gowdy of South Carolina and Judiciary’s Bob Goodlatte of Virginia.

The California Republican is asking his fellow GOP legislators to summon for public testimony all 42 — a cast of FBI, Justice Department and State Department officials and outside anti-Trump people with whom they communicated.

Last year, amid a probe into Russian election interference, Mr. Nunes veered from the Trump collusion narrative. His new inquiry was sparked by indications that a piece of evidence driving the FBI probe — the Democratic Party-financed dossier — was unverified and at worst a hoax.

Former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, who was paid by Democrats to write the dossier and who told a Justice official he was “desperate” to destroy the Trump candidacy, is not one of the Nunes 42.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Cocktails & Popcorn: Perkins Coie, Child Welfare, Ohio State University, Espionage, Judiciary & ICC

"Belgium has really good beer, popcorn and jazz."

Yes, it is always a tragedy when a state ignores the horrors of their child welfare system, for which I have proselytized for some decades.

Just ask Perkins Coie.

Perkins Coie knows all about the tricks of the trade when it comes to generating propaganda to cover up the screams in child welfare by fighting for foster families...and not the kids.

And for those of you who think I am being crass when attacking Perkins Coie when it comes to working proactively with Ohio State University in preparations to mitigate legal damages in the upcoming settlement talks, like MSU, allow me to remind you, I live with the screams of children, fighting to be saved from foster care and adoption, as I have so fondly renamed the entire industry as the Trafficking of Tiny Humans, a residual of the peculiar institution.

Perkins Coie also has a reputation for interfering in elections which is why I am going to take this Ohio State University investigation of ignoring students in an entirely different direction.

Bob Goodlatte has announced that he is retiring from congress making the Chairmanship for the U.S. House Judiciary for the Republicans to be Jim Jordan.

Perkins Coie assisted in the removal of John Conyers, Jr. from congress, making his Ranking Member seat open for Jerrold Nadler.

But, here is the problem for the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) over there at Perkins Coie.

What if, just what if, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee is so infested by the dumpster juices of "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) of Perkins Coie, that it is impossible to hold impeachment hearings, due to all the corruption, all up there in the bowels of the committee, led by someone who calls Ohio their home?

That would mean....dare I say...that my dream is going to come true!

Until the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) can demonstrate honor to the people, and stand up to expose their role in the trafficking of tiny humans, I will continue to castigate until I get to go back down to the Schelt and ein maatjes broodschapt mit mijn Zoetje share.

Let us see how long it is going to take Perkins Coie, "Legal Genuises" (trademark pending) to let us know who is paying for this and who initiated the probe.

Smells like an intelligence gathering operation.

We no longer use the term "spying", the term is just so gauche', now-a-days.

Ohio State: 100 ex-students report sex misconduct by doctor

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — More than 100 former students have provided firsthand accounts of sexual misconduct by the now-dead Ohio State University team physician at the center of an ongoing investigation, the university said on Friday.

Over 200 former students and university employees have been confidentially interviewed by independent investigators reviewing allegations against Richard Strauss involving male athletes from 14 sports as well as his work at the student health center and his off-campus medical office, University President Michael Drake said. Those allegations range from 1979 to 1997, during most of Strauss' two decades on the faculty and medical staff.

"We are grateful to those who have come forward and remain deeply concerned for anyone who may have been affected by Dr. Strauss' actions," Drake said. "We remain steadfastly committed to uncovering the truth."

Ohio State has urged anyone with information to contact the Seattle-based law firm Perkins Coie's investigators, who are looking into the allegations, what university officials knew and how they responded to any concerns about Strauss. They also are reviewing whether Strauss examined high school students.

The university announced the investigation in April after allegations about Strauss were brought forward this year.

The school said investigators are accepting anonymous reports and noted that they aren't proactively reaching out to potential victims because they want to avoid re-traumatizing anyone who doesn't want to revisit such an experience.

The university said investigators plan 100 or more additional interviews. Those who say they've been interviewed include wrestlers who say they were groped during physicals and a former student who says he witnessed and experienced sexual abuse in one day while working at Strauss' off-campus medical office in the mid-1990s.

Also interviewed was Republican U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, who denies some wrestlers' claims that he knew about abuse when he was an assistant coach at Ohio State from 1987 to 1995.

The head coach back then, Russ Hellickson, similarly has said he would have reported any abuse if he had been aware of it.

Former athletes say they verbally raised concerns about Strauss as early as the late 1970s.

His employment records released by the university referenced no reprimands or disciplinary action over any such concerns, but Ohio State has a record of at least one documented complaint against Strauss. Paperwork from 1995 shows a then-director of the student health center said a student's complaint about being inappropriately touched by Strauss during an exam was the first such complaint he'd received.

The documentation that ex-student Steve Snyder-Hill obtained from Ohio State this week shows he complained about Strauss by phone — not by letter, as he'd recalled — and heard back from the director, Ted Grace. Snyder-Hill said he was told that Strauss denied his allegations.

"I want to assure you that we had never received a complaint about Dr. Strauss before, although we have had several positive comments," Grace's letter said.

Grace now leads student health services at Southern Illinois University. He declined to comment through a spokeswoman there.

Strauss killed himself in 2005. His relatives have said they were shocked by sexual abuse allegations against him.

Strauss' personnel file at Ohio State indicates he previously did research, taught or practiced medicine at Harvard University, Rutgers University, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Washington and the University of Hawaii. Most of those institutions say they have little record of Strauss, and none has said any concerns were raised about him.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Does Perkins Coie & Google Manipulate Elections?

Does Perkins Coie & Google manipulate elections?

It surely does look like it, and it also looks like they did some money laundering through the DNC and Clinton Foundation, too!

The following fabulous Twitter thread on the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) at Perkins Coie is from @almostjingo

It is absolutely fabulous!

Just to tag on, here is a bit of my background work on the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) over there at Perkins Coie.

Hillary Clinton, State Department, Department Of Defense & Google

The Clinton Foundation Launches Another Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Initiative

(1) “O, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive” the story of Google, Perkins Coie, CrowdStrike, Fusion GPS, Clinton, Soros and many other players. To begin, Google has been a client of #PerkinsCoie for quite a long time..

(2) #Google has a very close relationship with Clinton, it goes all the way back to her days as Secretary of State. Not only did they donate heavily to her campaign they also support the Clinton Foundation. In fact the boss even made her campaign plan.

(3) During the campaign Google and Perkins Coie just happened to partner together to release a tool designated to drive voter turnout. “Partnering” seems like a strange term considering they have long worked together.

(4) Oh and Google also decided to venture into cyber-security, they invested $100 million into a little company called #Crowdstrike

(5) Then a funny thing happened in April when #DNC noticed the servers had been penetrated they didn’t call the FBI they had an emergency meeting of course and in that meeting was none other than Sussman from #PerkinsCoie and he took control.

(6) Four days later, what did Sussman do? He called #Crowdstrike why not enlist the help of a company owned by your longtime client Google.

(7) Guess what else happened in April? #PerkinsCoie lawyer retained #FusionGPS who, as we know provided us with the #TrumpDossier

(8) So #PerkinsCoie who Democrats paid just over $26 million to in 2016, just happen to have hired the two most infamous companies that are responsible for #RussiaGate without either of them would there be any “proof” of “Russian interference”

(9) #FunFact Perkins Coie also represents Amazon, Starbucks and Facebook and Obama, who they defended during all pre-election lawsuits about his birth certificate.

(10) Oh and what would any story be without the one and only #Soros apparently #PerkinsCoie works with him day-to-day in fact if you look at addresses to many super PAC’s and organizations you may not see his name but you’ll see the address of Perkins Coie🧠👀

(11) For extra credit: Guess what firm went after @RealSheriffJoe ?? If you guessed #PerkinsCoie you win!! 🤦🏼‍♀️

(12) You might be wondering how all this money from Democrats makes it to #PerkinsCoiewithout raising any red flags with the #FEC ?!? Ah well, the commissioner is a former lawyer there as part of their Political Law Group 🔎💩

(13) BOOM there it is, the country everyone keeps leaving out #UKRAINE cc: @DropTha_Mic25 @with_integrity @chiIIum 👇🏻

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @ckadoodldoous view original on Twitter

(14) Per the guidance of @Imperator_Rex3 the original lump sum of financing to kick off #Crowdstrike came from Warburg Pincus aka Timothy Geithner.

(15) To Be Continued..

(16) Oh really? One down, how many more to go? Adios Hilda campaign planner and head of Alphabet (aka Google) aka owners of #FusionGPS #TheStormIsHere

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©