Well, it is because of child welfare.
Yes, that is correct.
Not only are children still statutorily codified as property, or rather chattel, but the 13th Amendment made sure that the best financial interests of the child were placed under the parental rights of corporations.
Yes, that is correct, corporations have parental rights.
 |
| Commercial Surrogacy: the new term for saying: "Trafficking Tiny Humans" |
What is a 'Parent Company'
A parent company is a company that controls other, smaller businesses by owning an influential amount of voting stock or control. Parent companies are typically larger firms that exhibit control over one or more small subsidiaries in either the same industry or complimentary industries. Parent companies can be either hands-on or hands-off with subsidiaries, depending on the amount of managerial control given to subsidiary managers.
BREAKING DOWN 'Parent Company'
A parent company is a larger corporation that has significant ownership over a subsidiary or group of subsidiaries. These partially or wholly-owned smaller companies are controlled by the parent, to varying degrees; however, all parent companies, for the most part, own more than 50% of a subsidiary's voting stock.
So, what exactly is commercial surrogacy?
According to surrogacy.com, defines commercial surrogacy as such:
Commercial surrogacy refers to any surrogacy arrangement in which the surrogate mother is compensated for her services beyond reimbursement of medical expenses.
The corporate surrogate parent model is currently being implemented on the state level as seen in the EPIC Foundation.
From 2004 to the present The EPIC Foundation has collaborated with the Hawaii State Department of Education in training and appointing Surrogate Parents to eligible children. Surrogate parents ensure that eligible children receive an education comparable to children without disabilities in all matters pertaining to their identification, evaluation, and educational program placement. The Surrogate Parent Program was established by the Hawaii State Department of Education to ensure proper representation and services for children with disabilities as mandated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) and Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (amended by the Rehabilitation From 2004 to the present The EPIC Foundation has collaborated with the Hawaii State Department of Education in training and appointing Surrogate Parents to eligible children. Surrogate parents ensure that eligible children receive an education comparable to children without disabilities in all matters pertaining to their identification, evaluation, and educational program placement.
Eligible Children are those:
- Whose parents cannot be identified.
- Whose parents cannot be located
- Who are wards of the state under the laws of the state
- Those considered to be unaccompanied youth as stated under the Stewart B. McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act
- That have no relative willing and able to serve as an educational representative for a student who has reasched the age of majority and lacks decisional capacity to provide informed consent.
As seen here, corporations have parent disclosures but individuals do not, according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures.
According to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 7.1, a Corporate Parent Disclosure Statement is:
(a) Who Must File; Contents. A nongovernmental corporate party must file 2 copies of a disclosure statement that:
(1) identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock; or
(2) states that there is no such corporation.
Individuals are granted the rights of custodianship and guardianship, where the parent disclosure is conferred upon the States Attorney General, by United States Code, 15 U.S.C. 15(c):
The "crime" for which the States Attorney General may bring forth on behalf of the Corporation of the State is now the crime of poverty, which is manifests itself in the form of asset forfeiture policies through privatization.Any attorney general of a State may bring a civil action in the name of such State, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in such State, in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the defendant, to secure monetary relief as provided in this section for injury sustained by such natural persons to their property by reason of any violation of sections 1 to 7 of this title. The court shall exclude from the amount of monetary relief awarded in such action any amount of monetary relief (A) which duplicates amounts which have been awarded for the same injury, or (B) which is properly allocable to (i) natural persons who have excluded their claims pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of this section, and (ii) any business entity.
STATE CONSTITUTION (EXCERPT) CONSTITUTION OF MICHIGAN OF 1963 § 9
Slavery and involuntary servitude. Sec. 9. Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude unless for the punishment of crime, shall ever be tolerated in this state. History: Const. 1963, Art. I, § 9, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964. Former constitution: See Const. 1908, Art. II, § 8.
Oh, but involuntary servitude is tolerated in Michigan, under Child Protection Laws, as "failure to provide for the necessary needs of the child" is poverty, which is abuse and neglect, grounds for a trustee corporation to state the "best interests of the child".
As we see the progression of the parental rights of corporations, policies are now being diffused across the nation, in those pilot model states, by amending language to include the terms "children" and"seniors" into term, "disabled", then creating and promoting a new nomenclature for chattel law, or rather "personhood".
So, if an individual must rely upon any form of social assistance, seen the mandatory Medicaid work requirement, the state assigns "custodianship & guardianship" to privatized contractors through case management, probably better understood as a Micro Emergency Manager of the trust fund.
The trust fund, in this instance is the Social Security Trust Fund, where corporations have parental rights seize these "assets" to for providing services to "The Poors", or rather the disabled.
Think about this policy as a new form of indentured servitude, but there is nothing worded in these new state laws where a time period, like the traditional seven years indenturtude or working off one's debt releases one from the default transfer to the privatized corporation.
Act 327 of 1931
450.157 Trustee corporation; hospitals; asylums; trustee instrument; indenturing or apprenticing destitute or foundling;children; withdrawal.
Sec. 157.
(1) In all cases where lands, or any other property, amounting in value to $5,000.00 or more, have been or are given, granted, devised, or bequeathed to 3 or more trustees for the purpose of founding or endowing a hospital or other charitable asylum for the care or relief of indigent or other sick or infirm or aged persons, or the care of minor orphans or children and youth with special health care needs or for the care and protection of unfortunate women, or any number of those purposes, the trustees may incorporate under this act as a trustee corporation. Unless restricted by the trust instrument, the trustees may unite in that incorporation with other persons contributing to the maintenance of the hospital or asylum, and all of those other persons shall become members of the corporation upon making the contribution as may be fixed and determined in the articles or by-laws of the corporation. However, any 3 or more persons may incorporate for any charitable purpose described in this subsection as a trustee corporation, where the hospital, home, asylum, or other institution to be founded by the corporation is to be constructed, equipped, and maintained principally by donations not made under any trust deed or other instrument in writing declaring the uses and purposes to which the property shall be devoted, and that corporation shall have authority to fix and prescribe the terms and conditions of membership in the corporation.
(2) The trustees of a trustee corporation described in subsection (1), or a majority of them, are hereby authorized and empowered to indenture or apprentice to responsible persons, any destitute or foundling children who now or later become under the charge or care of that corporation, until those children shall respectively become of lawful age, and to make that indenture in each case as binding and effective in all respects as if the trustees were the lawful parents or guardians of those children. However, the trustees shall have power to withdraw a child from any person to which he or she is indentured, when in their opinion the interests of the child require it.
History: 1931, Act 327, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931 ;-- CL 1948, 450.157 ;-- Am. 2015, Act 89, Imd. Eff. June 25, 2015
Compiler's Notes: The catchline following the act section number was incorporated as part of the section when the act was enacted.
Former Law: See section 10 of Ch. I of Part IV of Act 84 of 1921, being CL 1929, § 10086; and section 11 of Ch. I of Part IV of Act 84 of 1921, being CL 1929, § 10087.
So, now you know why corporations have parental rights.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment