Showing posts sorted by relevance for query SEC. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query SEC. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, August 2, 2018

Cocktails & Popcorn: SEC, Kwame Kilpatrick & Detroit Unfinished Business

Image result for vintage wine
Outstanding SEC investigations of Detroit
"It is time to uncork."
Whenever opening a vintage wine, one must always enjoy the messaging of the label.

In this instance, the vintage wine is SEC, a very dry vintage going back to the days of the unfinished public corruption situation, still rolling strong, in Detroit.

Now, why would the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission be dust off and bring up unfinished business from the cellar of public corruption history?

Can you say, "Bonds and structured debt"?

I can, and I bet SEC is the message.

Stay tuned.

Judge boosts Kwame Kilpatrick's debt to $11.5M


Detroit — A federal judge sent former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick a prison cell-warming gift Wednesday: a $552,862 bill stemming from another City Hall scandal.
Kilpatrick, 48, who was recently transferred from an Oklahoma prison to a New Jersey lock-up, was ordered to pay the money to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC claimed Kilpatrick was part of a scheme to strong-arm a city pension fund businessman for $125,000 worth of private flights, Prince concert tickets, steakhouse dinners, golf trips and VIP hotel rooms in Las Vegas.
The order from U.S. District Judge Victoria Roberts boosted Kilpatrick's debt to more than $11.5 million, which includes taxes, restitution related to various criminal convictions, attorney fees, loans and credit card bills.
Collecting could be difficult. Kilpatrick claimed he was broke before being convicted of racketeering conspiracy in 2013 and recently said he had 96 cents in his prison commissary account. Kilpatrick isn't scheduled to be released from prison until August 2037, though his family is pushing for clemency from President Donald Trump.
Kilpatrick’s finances came into sharper focus April 19. That’s when U.S. District Judge Arthur Tarnow ended a six-year legal battle by issuing a nearly $7.5 million judgment to a firm owned by minority contractor Willie McCormick.
McCormick sued the former mayor and contractor Bobby Ferguson in 2012, alleging they ran a secret scheme to steer water department work to favored firms.





McCormick’s lawsuit mirrored allegations that were central to the racketeering conspiracy case against Kilpatrick and Ferguson. Ferguson was sentenced to 21 years in federal prison.
Kilpatrick, Ferguson and former mayoral aide Derrick Miller never responded to the civil lawsuit and McCormick received a default judgment in 2016. A federal magistrate judge in March issued a recommendation that McCormick receive $7,477,874, which represents lost profits on three Detroit Water and Sewerage Department contracts.
The McCormick lawsuit was filed the same year as a separate civil complaint filed against Kilpatrick and others, including former Detroit Treasurer Jeffrey Beasley.




In April, the SEC’s lawyers asked Roberts to issue a final judgment. 
Beasley, 49, was sentenced to 11 years in federal prison in 2015 for pocketing bribes while serving on the city’s pension fund boards.
Beasley was the lead defendant in a widespread corruption case that provided insight into a system of businessmen bribing pension trustees for their vote on investments that were supposed to raise money for retiree benefits. Instead, two Detroit pension funds lost more than $95 million in corrupt deals.
On April 16, six years after the SEC filed the lawsuit, Kilpatrick responded and asked to have the judgment set aside.
Kilpatrick wrote that he did not recall anything about the lawsuit and was preoccupied with the criminal corruption case.
In a letter sent from federal prison in Oklahoma, Kilpatrick asked the judge for an “opportunity to zealously and vigorously defend myself.”
In response, the SEC blamed Kilpatrick for ignoring the lawsuit, a copy of which was served on the former Detroit mayor at his rental home in May 2012 in Texas.
“Although he indisputably knew about the complaint, Kilpatrick never answered, pled, appeared, or otherwise defended the SEC’s charges,” the commission’s attorney Timothy Leiman wrote in a filing.
On Wednesday, the judge said Kilpatrick's excuses for failing to respond to the SEC lawsuit were illegitimate.
The judge ordered Kilpatrick and Beasley to pay $122,923 plus $39,939 interest.
Kilpatrick also was ordered to pay a $390,000 civil penalty.
Here is a breakdown of Kilpatrick's other debts awaiting his release from federal prison:
■ $1,520,654 in restitution to the city water department from the city hall corruption scandal.
■ $854,062 in restitution to the city stemming from the text-message scandal that ended his political career. Kilpatrick hasn’t made a payment since before being sent to prison.





■ $650,000 in attorney fees.
■ $240,000 in loans from Compuware co-founder Peter Karmanos Jr. and businessmen Roger Penske, Dan Gilbert and James Nicholson.
■ $195,000 in federal taxes.
■ $53,577 in student loan and credit card debt.
rsnell@detroitnews.com

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Oh My Goodness, Broken Trust Forgot Child Welfare Fraud

As always, I would like to thank the dedicated members of the U.S. Department of Justice Operation Broken Trust Task Force for repairing the public trust.


And, as always, I would like to ask why there are no child welfare fraud schemes in this operation?


Oh my goodness, DOJ forgot to include foster care fraud!
Golly gee willikers, I always forget.  Anything dealing with child welfare is protected, by law, from public disclosure....including the books...including the fraud schemes.  Oh my goodness.

Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force Announces Results of Largest-Ever Nationwide Operation Targeting Investment Fraud

Washington, D.C.
December 06, 2010

U.S. Department of Justice
202) 514-2007/TDD (202) 514-1888
WASHINGTON—Attorney General Eric Holder announced today the results of Operation Broken Trust, a nationwide operation organized by the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to target investment fraud. To date, the operation has involved enforcement actions against 310 criminal defendants and 189 civil defendants for fraud schemes that harmed more than 120,000 victims throughout the country. The operation’s criminal cases involved more than $8.3 billion in estimated losses and the civil cases involved estimated losses of more than $2.1 billion. Operation Broken Trust is the first national operation of its kind to target a broad array of investment fraud schemes that directly prey upon the investing public.

In announcing the results of Operation Broken Trust, Attorney General Holder was joined by FBI Executive Assistant Director Shawn Henry, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Director of Enforcement Robert Khuzami, U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) Chief Postal Inspector Guy Cottrell, Deputy Chief Rick Raven of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), Acting Director of Enforcement Vince McGonagle of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and other members of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.

The interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force was established by President Obama to lead an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. Starting on Aug. 16, 2010, within a three-and-a-half month period, Operation Broken Trust involved 211 criminal cases and 60 civil enforcement actions. Ninety-one defendants have been sentenced to prison, including several sentences of more than 20 years in prison.

“With this operation, the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force is sending a strong message,” said Attorney General Holder. To the public: be alert for these frauds, take appropriate measures to protect yourself, and report such schemes to proper authorities when they occur. And to anyone operating or attempting to operate an investment scam: cheating investors out of their earnings and savings is no longer a safe business plan—we will use every tool at our disposal to find you, to stop you, and to bring you to justice.”

“This operation highlights the scope of this problem, and its impact on individuals from all walks of life,” said FBI Executive Assistant Director Henry. “This one sweep alone involves fraud schemes that harmed more than 120,000 victims. The schemes may change, but the underlying greed does not. Working with our partners, we in the FBI will use all the investigative techniques in our arsenal, including undercover operations, to bring those responsible to justice.”

“Fraud by well-known companies or high-profile executives gets the biggest headlines, but other scams are equally devastating to hard working families and retirees,” said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Victims want justice and don’t much care who the fraudster is or how unique the fraud. Today’s actions underscore that law enforcement agrees and will pursue fraud in whatever form.”

Enforcement actions taken as a result of Operation Broken Trust involve a range of different investment fraud schemes, all of which prey directly on the investing public. The operators of these schemes often promise high returns to investors, but engage in little to no legitimate investment activity. Such schemes include Ponzi schemes, affinity fraud, prime bank/high-yield investment scams, foreign exchange (FOREX) frauds, business opportunity fraud, and other similar schemes. In some instances, operators of these schemes filed for bankruptcy in an attempt to avoid claims by victim-investors.

“The U.S. Postal Inspection Service has a long tradition of protecting postal customers from these types of investment and Ponzi scams and bringing those responsible to justice,” said USPIS Chief Postal Inspector Cottrell. “The Postal Inspection Service constantly strives to protect our customers and the general public from falling victim to these scams that claim millions of dollars every year.”

“The results announced today demonstrate the effectiveness of federal civil and criminal law enforcement in bringing to justice those who have engaged in financial fraud schemes,” said Acting Director McGonagle of the Division of Enforcement for CFTC. “The CFTC continues to devote substantial enforcement resources to combat financial fraud. We appreciate the partnership with the other members of the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to protect the public from financial fraudsters.”

“Securities and investment frauds are serious offenses which have brought financial ruin to many citizens. Promoters of Ponzi schemes prey upon trusting investors and then steal their hard earned money,” said Rick Raven, Deputy Chief, IRS Criminal Investigation. “IRS Criminal Investigation is proud to bring our forensic accounting skills to this joint venture with our law enforcement partners to put a stop to this and other types of white collar fraud.”

Operation Broken Trust was conducted in conjunction with various Department of Justice components—including the U.S. Attorney Offices, the FBI, the Criminal and Civil Divisions and the U.S. Trustee Program—as well as the SEC, USPIS, the CFTC, IRS-CI, the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Secret Service, and the National Association of Attorneys General.

As a part of Operation Broken Trust, the task force is making the public aware of resources available to protect against these types of fraud and how to report fraud when it occurs. To learn more about investment scams, how to take steps to protect yourself from scams, or how to report investment fraud if you believe you have been victimized, go to StopFraud.gov. The website includes links to a wide array of task force member resources.

The President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. For more information on the task force, visit StopFraud.gov.

View Case Examples
View Statistics Sheet
Operation Broken Trust: Case Examples

The following are examples of enforcement actions taken as a part of Operation Broken Trust:

$485 Million Investment Scam Defrauded Thousands

Joseph Blimline pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of Texas on Aug. 31, 2010, for his role in one of North Texas’ largest oil and gas investment Ponzi schemes defrauding 7,700 investors of more than $485 million. Blimline was a majority owner of Provident Royalties, an investment company. Beginning in 2006, Blimline and others involved at Provident Royalties made false representations and failed to disclose other material facts to their investors to induce the investors into providing payments to Provident. The investors were not told that Blimline had received millions of dollars of unsecured loans and had been previously charged with securities fraud. Blimline issued approximately 20 oil and gas offerings, and used a significant amount of the money raised in these offerings to purchase oil and gas assets from earlier offerings and to pay dividends to earlier investors in order to facilitate the scheme. Blimline also pleaded guilty to charges related to a separate, but similar oil and gas scheme based in Michigan that defrauded investors out of $50 million. The criminal case against Blimline was brought by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Texas and was investigated by the FBI, in coordination with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which previously had filed a civil action to freeze the assets of Blimline and others.

Chicago Ponzi Scheme Operator Victimized Elderly Italian Immigrants

Frank Castaldi was sentenced on Sept. 15, 2010, in the Northern District of Illinois to 23 years in prison for operating a Ponzi scheme that resulted in more than $30 million in losses to hundreds of victims, including many elderly Italian immigrants. As part of his scheme, Castaldi guaranteed investors that he would pay them annual returns between 10 and 15 percent. He made false representations to most investors about investing their principal in his various businesses, and about the source of the funds that he used to make their interest payments. Castaldi used new investors’ principal payments to make interest payments to other investors, without disclosing the true source of the interest payments. Castaldi also lost investors’ money by funding a failed banquet hall and other failing businesses, and by purchasing stocks. The case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois and investigated by the FBI and Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI).

Florida Man Stole Millions from Investors to Fund His Lavish Lifestyle

Nevin Shapiro, the former owner and chief executive officer of Capitol Investments USA Inc., pleaded guilty on Sept. 15, 2010, in the District of New Jersey, for his role in a multi-million-dollar Ponzi scheme. From January 2005 through November 2009, Shapiro solicited investors from New Jersey and throughout the United States through Capitol, telling them that he would use their money to fund his wholesale grocery distribution business. As a result of these solicitations, investors sent more than $880 million to Shapiro and Capitol during this time period. Capitol had virtually no income generating business at that time and Shapiro used new investor funds to make principal and interest payments to existing investors, as well as to fund his own lavish lifestyle. Shapiro used investor funds to pay illegal sports gambling debts, to purchase floor seats at Miami Heat basketball games and to make payments on his Riviera yacht and his residence in Miami Beach. Shapiro also used investor funds to make payments to student athletes attending a local university in the Miami area and to make donations to the university. The Ponzi scheme resulted in an estimated loss of $89 million to 75 victims. The case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey and investigated by the FBI and IRS-CI, with coordination from the SEC, which previously had filed parallel civil charges.

Texas Man Allegedly Targeted Members of Christian Faith in Investment Scam

Eldon A. Gresham Jr. was indicted in the Northern District of Texas on Sept. 21, 2010, on 10 counts of mail fraud in connection with a foreign currency exchange (FOREX) trading scam. From January 2004 through June 2009, Gresham solicited at least 90 individuals to invest in his FOREX trading business, the Gresham Company. Gresham falsely represented to potential investors that he generated consistent returns on investments of up to 10 percent per month. In fact, Gresham was actually losing money on his FOREX trading. Gresham also concealed from investors that he used their investment funds for personal reasons or as payments to earlier investors. Over the life of the scheme, Gresham obtained nearly $15.8 million from unsuspecting victims. Gresham used contacts from the Texas area and beyond to locate investors and targeted members of the Christian faith, who were elderly and particularly vulnerable to Gresham’s inducements. Gresham often told potential investors that he believed his success in FOREX trading was a blessing and gift from God, and Gresham considered his investment business to be “his ministry.” Gresham also encouraged people to invest by telling them that investors could use their investment gains to “further God’s work.” The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Texas and investigated by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

Ponzi Scheme Targeted Members of Four New York Churches

Bryant Ismail Rodriguez was sentenced on Sept. 24, 2010, in the Southern District of New York to nine years in prison for his role in a Ponzi scheme involving nearly $2 million in losses and more than 185 victims. Beginning in the spring of 2007, Rodriguez, a member of El Camino Church in the Washington Heights neighborhood of Manhattan, told members of that church, another church in Manhattan, and two churches in the Bronx, N.Y., that he was involved with an electronics distribution company named Communication and Electronics Group Inc. Rodriguez offered church members opportunities to invest in C&E, promising returns of between 30 to 40 percent every month, additional cash bonuses and even the opportunity to purchase homes in the Dominican Republic and New York City with their investment earnings. In reality, C&E was a shell company created by Rodriguez, which never sold any items to a major retailer and never purchased from an electronics manufacturer. The case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and investigated by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

Investment Scam Victimized 800 Individuals Throughout the United States

Three individuals were indicted and four individuals pleaded guilty in the fall of 2010 in the Eastern District of Virginia for their roles in A&O entities, a group of businesses that acquired and marketed life settlements to investors. The defendants defrauded investors by making misrepresentations about such things as A&O’s prior success, its size and office locations, its number of employees, the risks of its investment offerings, and its safekeeping and use of investor funds. Their fraud scheme involved more than 800 victims throughout the U.S. and Canada, many of whom were elderly. The cases are being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia and the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice and investigated by the Virginia Financial and Securities Fraud Task Force, which includes the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, IRS-CI and the FBI. The SEC previously filed a parallel civil case.

Thomas Petters’ Coconspirators Assisted in Carrying Out Ponzi Scheme

Seven coconspirators of Thomas J. Petters were sentenced to prison in the District of Minnesota in September 2010: Robert White, Larry Reynolds, Michael Catain, James Wehmhoff, Greg Bell, Harold Katz, and Deanna Coleman. Petters used a successful corporation for over a decade to perpetrate a scheme that defrauded investors of $3.4 billion in the largest fraud case in Minnesota history. Through his company, Petters Group Worldwide LLC (PGW), Petters obtained loans from hedge funds and investment groups for the stated purpose of financing sales to well-known big box retailers, such as Costco and Sam’s Club. The investigation revealed that the purchase and subsequent sale of merchandise to the retailers were actually fabricated transactions supported by fictional documentation. Petters was convicted of mail and wire fraud, conspiracy and money laundering charges in 2009 and was sentenced in April 2010 to 50 years in prison. The cases were prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Minnesota and investigated by the FBI and IRS-CI.

Internet-Based Fraud Targeted the Deaf Community

On Oct. 6, 2010, the SEC obtained a temporary restraining order and emergency order freezing the assets of Imperia Invest IBC. According to the SEC’s complaint, Imperia solicited investors through the Internet, claiming it would use the investor funds to purchase Traded Endowment Policies (TEPs), the British term for viatical settlements. Imperia falsely promised to pay investors—the majority of whom are members of the deaf community—a guaranteed return of 1.2 percent per day. The SEC also alleges that Imperia’s website said that investors could only access their profits by purchasing a Visa debit card from Imperia, but Imperia has no relationship with Visa and was using the Visa name without authorization. Through its website and a series of offshore PayPal style bank accounts, Imperia raised in excess of $7 million from at least 14,000 investors worldwide, including 6,000 investors in the U.S. who have invested in excess of $4 million with Imperia.

Chicago Man Operated Ponzi Scheme

On Oct. 7, 2010, the SEC charged a Chicago-area company and its owner for perpetrating a Ponzi scheme in which they promised investors extraordinary returns generated from a purportedly successful real estate business. The SEC alleges that Robert R. Anderson of Mt. Prospect, Ill., issued promissory notes through his company Rosand Enterprises that he claimed would generate investor returns ranging from 10 to 20 percent per month. Anderson misrepresented to investors that Rosand Enterprises purchased, constructed, rehabbed, and sold homes in the Chicago area and other locations. However, Anderson was not making any money in the real estate market and was instead conducting a Ponzi scheme to pay earlier investors with funds from new investors. He also helped himself to investor money to buy cars, make hefty credit card payments, and pay for his daughter's wedding. The SEC’s complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in Chicago, alleges that Anderson raised approximately $12 million from at least 77 investors between approximately December 2005 and May 2008.

Two Florida-Based Fund Managers Facilitated Petters Ponzi Scheme

On Oct.14, 2010, the SEC charged Bruce F. Prevost and David W. Harrold and their firms with fraudulently funneling more than a billion dollars of investor money into a Ponzi scheme operated by Minnesota businessman Thomas J. Petters. The SEC alleges that Prevost and Harrold falsely assured their investors and potential investors that the flow of their money would be safeguarded by collateral accounts and described a phony process for protecting their assets. When Petters was unable to make payments on investments held by the funds they managed, Prevost, Harrold, and their firms concealed it from investors by concocting sham note exchange transactions with Petters, who the SEC charged last year along with an Illinois-based hedge fund manager who also facilitated the scheme. The SEC’s complaint alleges that Prevost, Harrold, and their firms invested more than $1 billion in hedge fund assets with Petters while pocketing more than $58 million in fees.

Florida Man Victimized Haitian-Americans in $14 Million Scam

Ronnie E. Bass Jr. was convicted in the Southern District of Florida on Oct. 25, 2010, for his participation in a Ponzi scheme operated from February 2008 through January 2009. Bass and his coconspirators engaged in a classic affinity fraud which sought to exploit the common interests and trusts of a certain group of individuals. Bass and others solicited and targeted members of the Haitian community to invest in Homepals LLC. Homepals offered investments in “unsecured notes” sold by the defendants that promised to double investor funds in 90 days. By November 2008, Homepals could not generate enough investor funds to pay off the existing investors. The scam led to an estimated loss of $14.3 million to 500 victims. The case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida and investigated by the FBI, with cooperation from the SEC, which previously had filed a civil action to enjoin the scheme.

Ponzi Scheme Operator Used Spanish-Language Media to Solicit Investors

Juan Rangel pleaded guilty on Oct. 27, 2010, for his role in operating a Ponzi scheme. Rangel and his company, the Commerce-based Financial Plus Investments, recruited new investors through Spanish-language newspapers and magazines, as well as in radio advertisements and infomercials broadcast on television. Rangel and Financial Plus promised to pay investors guaranteed returns of 60 percent each year out of the profits from Financial Plus’ real estate investments and lending business. However, Rangel admitted that Financial Plus did not make any actual profits from real estate or lending. Rangel instead used the new investors’ money to make payments to other investors and for his own personal use, including the monthly mortgage payments on his $3 million home and monthly payments for his Lamborghini sports car. Rangel also admitted that he and others operated a separate mortgage fraud scheme that targeted Latino homeowners at risk of losing their homes by offering them help to avoid foreclosure. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California is prosecuting the case and the FBI, U.S. Postal Inspection Service and IRS-CI are investigating the case.

Owners of Trading Company Allegedly Defrauded Investors

Craig Karlis and Ahmet Devrim Akyil were indicted on Oct. 28, 2010, in the District of Massachusetts. Karlis was charged with nine counts of wire fraud and two tax crimes and Akyil was charged with 10 counts of wire fraud. The indictment alleges that Karlis and Akyil founded Boston Trading and Research (BTR) and recruited customers to open accounts with BTR to trade in the foreign currency exchange market. Karlis and Akyil allegedly made a series of misrepresentations to customers about how BTR operated and about what they did with customer money. They allegedly diverted millions of dollars from BTR customer accounts to pay BTR’s business expenses and their personal expenses, such as houses, cars and jewelry. Karlis and Akyil told customers that BTR employed strategies to reduce risk, when in fact they did not. By July 2008, BTR had approximately 1,200 customers and more than $35 million under management. On the same day as the indictment was filed, the SEC filed a civil complaint against Karlis, Akyil, and BTR for the same conduct, alleging that Karlis, Akyil, and BTR sent misleading account statements to investors while stealing their funds and incurring major trading losses. The criminal case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts, with cooperation from the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and investigated by the FBI and IRS-CI. The civil case against Karlis, Akyil, and BTR is being handled by the SEC.

Michigan Man Operated an Oil-Related Ponzi Scheme

On Nov. 10, 2010, the SEC filed civil charges against a Grosse Point, Mich., man and his company, Zada Enterprises LLC, for allegedly conducting a $27.5 million Ponzi scheme in which investors were told that their money would be put in oil-related investments—earning as much as 48 percent. In a court filing seeking to shut down the scheme, the SEC alleged that the company owner, Joseph Paul Zada, also claimed he had exclusive access to certain oil investments, had business contacts in the Middle East and had earned substantial returns from prior oil-related investments. Instead, according to the SEC, Zada was using the money from approximately 60 investors to buy a home in Grosse Point Shores, an equestrian facility in Palm Beach County, jewelry, and cars.

Investment Manager Operated $40 Million Ponzi Scheme

Investment manager Philip Barry was convicted on Nov. 17, 2010, of one count of securities fraud and 33 counts of mail fraud in the Eastern District of New York. Barry operated a long-standing and large-scale Ponzi scheme. Approximately 800 individuals invested a total of more than $40 million in Barry’s business, the Leverage Group. To induce investments and discourage withdrawals, Barry, among other things, guaranteed specified positive rates of return, issued account statements that showed growing account balances, represented that investing in the Leverage Group was safe and promised that withdrawals could be made easily. The evidence at trial established that Barry actually was running a Ponzi scheme, paying returns to Leverage Group investors not from any profits earned on investments, but rather from existing investors’ deposits or money paid by new investors. Barry never produced or earned the rates of return that he advertised and cited in clients’ account statements. Rather, the positive rates of return were simply pre-determined interest rates made up by Barry. In bankruptcy testimony given by Barry, he estimated that he owed his investors $60 million. In bankruptcy proceedings, the U.S. Trustee Program secured from Barry a waiver of Chapter 7 discharge. The criminal case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York and investigated by the FBI, in coordination with the SEC, which previously had filed a related civil action.

Texas Man and Others Sold Fraudulent Oil and Gas Investments

The SEC filed a lawsuit in Dallas on Sept. 1, 2010, alleging that Jason A. Halek of Southlake, Texas, and two companies he owns and controls—Halek Energy LLC and CBO Energy Inc.—fraudulently sold investments in Texas oil and gas projects. The complaint alleges that, between June 2007 and September 2009, Halek, Halek Energy and CBO Energy raised approximately $22 million from at least 300 investors nationwide by making materially false and misleading statements about the risks of the oil and gas projects, the use of investor funds, and potential returns from the investments. On Nov. 30, 2010, the SEC also charged Priscilla Sabado, a broker-dealer and investment adviser representative at AXA Adisors, LLC, with fraudulently selling Halek Energy interests to her clients, including a financially unsophisticated 24-year old blind man.

Two Mexican Companies Allegedly Issued False Statements

On Dec. 1, 2010, the CFTC charged two Mexican companies, MXBK Group S.A. de C.V and its foreign currency (FOREX) trading division, MBFX S.A., with issuing false customer statements and misrepresenting trading results on their website in connection with their FOREX trading enterprise. The action was filed in the U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City. According to the complaint, the defendants have accepted at least $28 million from over 800 U.S. customers for the purpose of trading FOREX in pooled accounts on behalf of those customers. The complaint further alleges that during the period of October 2005 through April 2009, the MXBK entities lost approximately $29 million in customer funds during which time they falsely reported overall trading profits. In a related action, the SEC filed a civil injunctive action alleging that Clifton K. Oram, Don C. Winkler and William R. Michael engaged in fraud by offering and selling investments in MXBK Group’s FOREX trading program. The SEC’s complaint alleges that Oram, Winkler and Michael raised tens of millions of dollars and attracted investors by touting impressive monthly returns posted on MXBK Group’s website. In reality, neither Oram, Winkler nor Michael understood how the FOREX market or FOREX trading functioned, and they blindly accepted MXBK Group’s representations about its background and track record.

Operation Broken Trust: Statistics Sheet

Operation Period: August 16 - December 1, 2010

Summary of results:

Criminal Cases:

Total Number of Cases: …………………….231
Total Number of Defendants: …………….. 343
Total Number of Arrests: ………………….. 64
Total Number of Info/Indictments: ……….. 158
Total Number of Convictions: …………….. 104
Total Number of Sentencings: …………….. 87
Total Estimated Loss Amount: …………… $8,384,150,054
Total Estimated Victims: ………………… 120,381

Civil Cases:

Total Number Civil Enforcement Actions: ... 60
Total Number of Defendants: ………………1891
Total Estimated Loss Amount: ……………. $2,134,681,5242
Total Estimated Victims: ………….………. 23,5663

1 This number includes individuals and corporations names as defendants in U.S. District Court actions and/or respondents in administrative proceedings, but does not include "doing business as" (d/b/a) or "formerly known as" (f/k/a) entities where named in those actions.

2 The estimated loss amount does not include more than $175,000,000 of debt owed to victims as a consequence of the underlying fraud schemes, which was precluded from Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge as a result of civil enforcement actions by the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee.

3 The estimated number of victims does not include over 3,500 victims in ongoing bankruptcy cases.

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

SEC & Congress Discuss Fraud & The Whisleblowers

SEC and the Congress have issues with the amount of the awards to whistleblowers.

Well, I can simply everyone's life and propose that this can all be resolved by bowing down and giving reverence to those who bear witness.

All you have to do is #sayhisname.

The SEC can not audit private companies because that is called an investigation.

The SEC can neither audit Public Private Partnerships....like the Detroit Land Bank Authority....because it never incorporated....so it has no SEC filings....and if it is listed in any other SEC filings on record....the SEC then should consider themselves whistleblowers, too....because they probably found some Corporate Shape Shifters.

Oh, my!

There are fake ass groups submitting fake ass letters to report fraud, to investigate something else, as a throw from what others are doing?

Well, I guess it would be a novel idea to have all whistleblower sign their name on any grievance, under penalty of law, don't ya think?

Wanna Bet The SEC Investigating The Detroit Land Bank Authority?



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, February 17, 2018

Wanna Bet The SEC Investigating The Detroit Land Bank Authority?

Image result for girl playing in flowers
The Goddess of the Woodshed enjoying the magical
investigative petals of the SEC.
One day, while on my mission, I found a beautiful concept, blossom right before my eyes.

It was the jurisdiction of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

SEC probes Miami Gardens’ $60-million bond issue; Were bond funds diverted?
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating Miami Gardens to determine whether city officials violated federal laws in connection with its $60-million general obligation bond issue approved by voters in 2014.
I was so excited because I remembered another city that issued bonds then diverted them.

Detroit!

Since SEC investigations are under seal, and I cannot verify if there is a current investigaiton, so I thought it wise to put it out there that Detroit qualifies to open an SEC investigation for improper use of bonds, just like they did in Miami Gardens.

The bonds were supposed to be for the students of Detroit Public Schools, but instead, City Council voted to shift the funding for the Little Ceasar's Sports Arena.

The Detroit Downtown Development Authority claims it owns the land, but it is not incorporated, just like the Detroit Land Bank Authority is not incorporated, which means it uses an NGO to launder its money, or rather it filed false information to federal financial authorities, just like the Detroit Land Bank Authority did.

How can you own land if you have no instruments of legal authority?

This fake corporations called the Detroit Downtown Development Authority also has the magical powers to levy school property taxes.

Then it dawned on me.

There is no such thing as the Detroit Downtown Development Authority because it is the Detroit Land Bank Authority using it as a strawman.

So, the question for the SEC is: "Where are the taxes?"

If these fake authorities are not incorporated, that means, if they collect taxes, to whom does the taxpayer make the check out to?

Wayne Country Treasurer?

City of Detroit?

And, to who does the Wayne County Treasurer and the City of Detroit make the check out to, since the Detroit Land Bank Authority is not incorporated and has no bank account.

So, I take it the Detroit Brownfield Redevelopment Authority is another front for the Detroit Land Bank Authority, as it is not incorporated, yet, according to the article, below, possesses the authority to enter into contracts and negotiate tax incentives with a private corporation, of the Pistons.

I bet they used the same team of "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) over at Perkins Coie.

The case was dismissed.

I bet the SEC already has the Detroit Land Bank Authority under investigation, along with all its foreign practice partners, like the Clinton Foundation, et al.

See, are not the components of the SEC just pretty petals of flowers?

I bet the SEC is investigating the Detroit Land Bank Authority, now.

I bet the SEC is investigating the "Legal Genuises" (trademark pending) over at Perkins Coie, too.

Lawsuit: Voters should decide if Little Caesars Arena gets public funding

A lawsuit filed today in federal court seeks to block public funding of Little Caesars Arena and a new Pistons headquarters without a vote of Detroit residents.

The lawsuit claims state law prohibits spending school property tax revenues on the economic development projects as planned because the schools millage voters approved in 2012 was to be used exclusively for Detroit Public Schools' operating expenses.

The Detroit Downtown Development Authority, the public entity that owns the arena and is responsible for its public funding, is expected to collect $726 million in school property tax revenues through 2051. The money will be used to pay off $363 million in public investments in the $862-million arena and the surrounding development district.

If the lawsuit is successful, it could threaten a significant pot of public money vital to construction of Little Caesars Arena and the new Pistons headquarters in New Center.

Government transparency advocate Robert Davis and D. Etta Wilcoxon, who is running for Detroit City Clerk, filed the lawsuit today in U.S. District Court.

They claim their constitutional right to vote has been violated because they should be able to vote against spending tax money on the arena and Pistons headquarters.

"The officials at the DDA and the Brownfield Authority should not have proceeded with these projects until they received all the necessary approvals that were required under the appropriate statutes," Davis said. "How all of those high-priced lawyers missed that, I don't know."

The lawsuit also names as a defendant the Detroit Brownfield Redevelopment Authority, which is involved in a tax-incentive plan that would provide the Pistons with about $20 million in publicly funded reimbursements for its $83-million practice facility and corporate headquarters. The tax-incentive plan still must be approved by the Detroit City Council.

Of the $20 million in proposed reimbursements to the Pistons, $7.9 million would come from the schools' operating fund, according to a report prepared for the Detroit City Council.

Bob Rossbach, a spokesman for the DDA, said he was not yet aware of the lawsuit.

“Obviously we will review its claims and will respond accordingly," Rossbach said, declining to comment further. According to the lawsuit, the state's general property tax act requires voter approval to spend money differently than voters originally approved.

The arena is expected to open in September. Work on the Pistons' facility could start this summer.
Since Little Caesars Arena was announced, the DDA has taken the position that the project does not negatively impact local schools because ultimately they do not lose any operating revenue. Rossbach did not provide any further explanation to that rationale today when asked in an e-mail.

Detroit Public Schools now essentially exists to collect taxes and pay down debt. The debt-ridden district has been replaced by the Detroit Public Schools Community District. Instead of the arena and Pistons practice facility, Davis said, the school taxes should go toward paying down the debt sooner.

The lawsuit also cites another section of the state's revised school code that says voters must have a say whenever tax money is used for any purpose other than that for which it was originally raised. 
Davis shrugged off concerns the lawsuit could hinder the projects, pointing out that the Red Wings and Pistons are owned by billionaires.
Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever. Leviticus 25:44-46. 
Complaint by Deadspin on Scribd
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

DOJ: Mobile Telesystems Pjsc and Its Uzbek Subsidiary Enter into Resolutions of $850 Million with the Department of Justice for Paying Bribes in Uzbekistan


Former General Director of MTS’s Uzbek Subsidiary and Former Uzbek Official Charged in Bribery and Money Laundering Scheme Totaling Almost $1 Billion

Moscow-based Mobile TeleSystems PJSC (MTS), the largest mobile telecommunications company in Russia and an issuer of publicly traded securities in the United States, and its wholly owned Uzbek subsidiary, KOLORIT DIZAYN INK LLC (KOLORIT), have entered into resolutions with the Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and agreed to pay a combined total penalty of $850 million to resolve charges arising out of a scheme to pay bribes in Uzbekistan.  In addition, charges were unsealed today against a former Uzbek official who is the daughter of the former president of Uzbekistan and against the former CEO of Uzdunrobita LLC, another MTS subsidiary, for their participation in a bribery and money laundering scheme involving more than $865 million in bribes from MTS, VimpelCom Limited (now VEON) and Telia Company AB (Telia) to the former Uzbek official in order to secure her assistance in entering and maintaining their business operations in Uzbekistan’s telecommunications market.
Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman of the Southern District of New York, Special Agent in Charge Raymond Villanueva of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Washington, D.C. and Chief Don Fort of IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) made the announcement.
Gulnara Karimova, 46, a citizen of Uzbekistan, was charged in an indictment filed in the Southern District of New York on March 7 with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.  Karimova is a former Uzbek official who allegedly had influence over the Uzbek governmental body that regulated the telecom industry.  Bekhzod Akhmedov, 44, a citizen of Uzbekistan and the former Uzbek executive, was charged in the same indictment with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), two counts of violating the FCPA, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.  Karimova’s and Akhmedov’s case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood of the Southern District of New York.  
“Gulnara Karimova stands accused of exploiting her official position to solicit and accept more than $865 million in bribes from three publicly traded telecom companies, and then laundering those bribes through the U.S. financial system,” said Assistant Attorney General Benczkowski.  “The indictment and corporate resolution announced today, together with two prior corporate resolutions involving bribes allegedly paid to Karimova, demonstrate the Department’s comprehensive approach to foreign corruption: we will aggressively pursue both corrupt foreign officials and the companies and individuals who bribe them in order to gain unfair business advantages, and we will do everything we can to keep the proceeds of that corruption out of the U.S. financial system.”
“This is the third installment in a trilogy of cases arising from an almost $1 billion bribery scheme that reached the highest echelons of the Uzbekistan government and was orchestrated by some of the largest telecommunications companies in the world,” said U.S. Attorney Berman.  “By funneling multimillion-dollar bribe payments through the U.S. financial system, the companies and individual defendants corruptly tried to tip the global economy in their favor and line their own pockets.  But they are now paying the price.  Today, my Office and our law enforcement partners are sending a bold, unequivocal message that the U.S. financial system is not in business to enable foreign bribery or money laundering.  This Office stands ready to prevent, prosecute, and penalize foreign corrupt practices wherever in the world we find them.”
“Corruption of this level and reach poisons our integrity as a participant in the global marketplace,” said HSI Washington Special Agent in Charge Villanueva.  “Thanks to our skillful and collaborative investigators at HSI and the IRS-CI, Karimova and Ahkmedov’s exploitive crimes will be presented before the just eye of our courts and no longer will such corruption be permitted to metastasize across our borders.” 
“With the increase in globalization and ease with which funds can be moved, criminals think their financial transactions cannot be tracked—but they would be wrong,” said IRS-CI Chief Fort.  “We will continue to investigate violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to ensure our country’s financial institutions are not used for devious purposes.  We are committed to aggressively pursuing all who engage in corruption, money laundering, and bribery for their own personal gain and at the expense of the U.S. government.”
According to the indictment against Karimova and Akhmedov, in or around the early 2000s, they agreed that Akhmedov would solicit and facilitate corrupt bribe payments from telecommunications companies seeking to enter the Uzbek market.  In exchange, Karimova allegedly used her influence over Uzbek authorities to help the telecommunications companies obtain and retain lucrative business opportunities in the Uzbek telecommunications market.  In total, Akhmedov conspired with the telecom companies and others to pay Karimova more than $865 million in bribes, and Akhmedov and Karimova conspired with others to launder and conceal those funds to, from and through bank accounts in the United States, in order to promote the ongoing bribery scheme, the indictment alleges. 
The charges in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
MTS entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the Department of Justice in connection with a criminal information filed yesterday in the Southern District of New York charging the company with one count of conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery and books and records provisions of the FCPA and one count of violating the internal controls provisions of the FCPA.  KOLORIT pleaded guilty to a one-count criminal information filed in the Southern District of New York, charging the company with conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery and books and records provisions of the FCPA.  Pursuant to its agreement with the department, MTS agreed to pay a total criminal penalty of $850 million to the United States, including a $500,000 criminal fine and $40 million in criminal forfeiture that MTS agreed to pay on behalf of KOLORIT.  MTS also agreed to the imposition of an independent compliance monitor for a term of three years and to implement rigorous internal controls and cooperate fully with the Department’s ongoing investigation, including its investigation of individuals such as Akhmedov and Karimova.  The case against MTS and KOLORIT is assigned to U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York.  
In related proceedings, MTS reached a settlement with the SEC.  Under the terms of its agreement with the SEC, MTS agreed to pay a $100 million civil penalty.  Consistent with Coordination of Corporate Resolution Penalties in Parallel and/or Joint Investigations and Proceedings Arising from the Same Misconduct (Justice Manual 1-12.100), the Department of Justice agreed to credit the civil penalty paid to the SEC as part of its agreement with MTS.  Thus, the combined total amount of criminal and regulatory penalties paid by MTS and KOLORIT to U.S. authorities will be $850 million.
According to the companies’ admissions, MTS and KOLORIT, through various managers and employees within MTS, MTS’s Uzbek subsidiaries Uzdunrobita LLC and KOLORIT, and other affiliated entities, paid approximately $420 million in bribes to Karimova, who had influence over the Uzbek governmental body that regulated the telecom industry.  The bribes were paid on multiple occasions between 2004 and 2012 so that MTS could enter the Uzbek market through the acquisition of Uzdunrobita and so that Uzdunrobita could gain valuable telecom assets and continue operating in Uzbekistan.  The companies admittedly structured and concealed the bribes through payments to shell companies that members of MTS’s and Uzdunrobita’s management knew were beneficially owned by Karimova.  MTS and Uzdunrobita also acquired KOLORIT, knowing that the price MTS and Uzdunrobita paid was inflated, in order to bribe Karimova in exchange for Uzdunrobita’s continuing to operate in Uzbekistan.  Uzdunrobita made payments to purported charities and for sponsorships to entities related to Karimova.  The Uzbek government expropriated Uzdunrobita in 2012 as a result of MTS’s, Uzdunrobita’s and KOLORIT’s failure to meet Karimova’s demands for additional payments.
A number of factors contributed to the Department’s criminal resolution with the companies, including (1) the companies did not voluntarily disclose; (2) the companies’ level of cooperation and remediation was lacking, not proactive; (3) the nature and seriousness of the office, including $420 million in bribes to a high-level Uzbek official; and (4) the mitigating factors present in this case, including that the Uzbek government expropriated the companies’  telecommunications assets in Uzbekistan, resulting in no realized pecuniary gain to the companies as a result of the misconduct.
The resolution, reached in coordination with the SEC’s resolution, marks the third such resolution by a major international telecommunications provider for bribery in Uzbekistan.  On Feb. 18, 2016, Amsterdam-based VimpelCom and its Uzbek subsidiary, Unitel LLC, entered into resolutions with the Department of Justice and admitted to a conspiracy to make more than $114 million in bribery payments to Karimova between 2006 and 2012.  On Sept. 21, 2017, Stockholm-based Telia and its Uzbek subsidiary, Coscom LLC, also entered into resolutions with the Department and admitted to a conspiracy to make more than $331 million in bribery payments to Karimova.  The investigation has thus far yielded a combined total of over $2.6 billion in global fines and disgorgement, including over $1.3 billion in criminal penalties to the United States.  In related actions, the Department has also filed civil complaints seeking the forfeiture of more than $850 million held in bank accounts in Switzerland, Belgium, Luxembourg and Ireland, which constitute bribe payments made by MTS, VimpelCom and Telia, or funds involved in the laundering of those corrupt payments to Karimova.
The IRS-CI and HSI are investigating the cases as part of the IRS Global Illicit Financial Team in Washington, D.C.  Assistant Chief Ephraim Wernick and Senior Litigation Counsel Nicola J. Mrazek of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Edward Imperatore and Daniel Noble of the Southern District of New York are prosecuting the case against MTS and KOLORIT.  Assistant Chief Wernick and Trial Attorney Elina Rubin-Smith of the Fraud Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Imperatore and Noble are prosecuting the case against Karimova and Akhmedov.  Trial Attorney Michael Khoo of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section (MLARS) is prosecuting the forfeiture case with substantial assistance from former MLARS Trial Attorney Marie M. Dalton, now an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Western District of Washington.
Law enforcement authorities in Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, France, Ireland, Isle of Man, Latvia, Luxembourg, Norway, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden and the United Kingdom have provided valuable assistance in this case.  The Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs provided significant assistance as well.  The SEC referred the matter to the Department and also provided extensive cooperation and assistance.
The Criminal Division’s Fraud Section is responsible for investigating and prosecuting all FCPA matters.  Additional information about the Justice Department’s FCPA enforcement efforts can be found at www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa.
Individuals with information about possible proceeds of foreign corruption located in or laundered through the United States should contact federal law enforcement or send an email to kleptocracy@usdoj.gov.


Image result for secMobile TeleSystems Settles FCPA Violations

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Russian telecommunications provider Mobile TeleSystems PJSC (MTS) will pay $100 million to resolve SEC charges that it violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) to win business in Uzbekistan.

According to the SEC’s order, MTS bribed an Uzbek official who was related to the former President of Uzbekistan and had influence over the Uzbek telecommunications regulatory authority.  During the course of the scheme, MTS made at least $420 million in illicit payments for the purpose of obtaining and retaining business.  The payments enabled MTS to enter the telecommunications market in Uzbekistan and operate there for eight years, during which it generated more than $2.4 billion in revenues.  In 2012, the Uzbek government expropriated MTS’s Uzbek operations.  As further described in the SEC’s order, the bribes were funneled to front companies controlled by the Uzbek official and were disguised in MTS’s books as acquisition costs, option payments, purchases of regulatory assets, and charitable donations.

“The company engaged in egregious misconduct for nearly a decade, secretly funneling hundreds of millions of dollars to a corrupt official.  Building business on a foundation of bribery leaves the business and American investor interests at the mercy of corrupt officials,” said Charles E. Cain, Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s FCPA Unit.

MTS consented to the SEC’s order finding that it violated the anti-bribery, books and records and internal accounting control provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and requiring it to pay a $100 million penalty.  In a related matter, MTS has entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice and its subsidiary has pleaded guilty in federal court, and has agreed to pay a criminal fine and forfeiture in the amount of $850 million.  The Department is crediting the $100 million penalty that MTS is paying to the SEC.  The company must also retain an independent compliance monitor for at least three years.

This is the third case brought by the SEC and the Department of Justice involving public companies operating in the Uzbek telecommunications market.  Taken as a whole, these actions have led to the recovery by U.S. and foreign authorities of $2.6 billion.

The Commission greatly appreciates the cooperation and assistance of the Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Fraud and Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Sections, the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Homeland Security, the Prosecution Authority of the Netherlands, the National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime in Norway (ØKOKRIM), the Swedish Prosecution Authority, the Office of the Attorney General in Switzerland, and the Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau in Latvia.  Valuable assistance was also provided by regulatory and law enforcement colleagues in the United Kingdom, France, and Ireland, including the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission, the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, the Bermuda Monetary Authority, the Central Bank of Ireland, the Paris Court of Appeals, the Serious Fraud Office, and the Financial Control Authority.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

DOJ; Two Ukrainian Nationals Indicted in Computer Hacking and Securities Fraud Scheme Targeting U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


Hacking and Trading Scheme Involved Theft of Thousands of ‘EDGAR’ Filings, Including Draft Earnings Reports of Publicly Traded Companies before Reports were Made Public

Two Ukrainian men have been charged for their roles in a large-scale, international conspiracy to hack into the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) computer systems and profit by trading on critical information they stole.
In a 16-count indictment unsealed today in the District of New Jersey, Artem Radchenko, 27, and Oleksandr Ieremenko, 26, both of Kiev, Ukraine, are charged with securities fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, computer fraud conspiracy, wire fraud, and computer fraud. The SEC also filed a civil complaint today charging Ieremenko along with several other individuals and entities.
The indictment alleges that Radchenko and Ieremenko hacked into the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system and stole thousands of files, including annual and quarterly earnings reports containing confidential, non-public, financial information, which publicly traded companies are required to disclose to the SEC. The defendants and others then profited by selling access to the confidential information in these reports and trading on this stolen information prior to its distribution to the investing public.
“The defendants allegedly orchestrated sophisticated computer intrusions to steal non-public information from the SEC, compromising the integrity of the market and depriving honest investors of a level playing field,” said Assistant Attorney General Benczkowski.  “The Department of Justice will aggressively pursue and prosecute those who attack our financial markets and seek to profit unfairly, no matter where such offenders reside.”
“The defendants charged in the indictment announced today engaged in a sophisticated hacking and insider trading scheme to cheat the securities markets and the investing public,” U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito said. “They targeted the Securities and Exchange Commission with a series of sophisticated and relentless cyber-attacks, stealing thousands of confidential EDGAR filings from the Commission’s servers and then trading on the inside information in those filings before it was known to the market, all at the expense of the average investor.”
“Today’s indictment sends a strong message to those criminals who choose to use the cyber-world to profit from network intrusion,” Mark McKevitt, Special Agent in Charge of the Secret Service Newark Field Office, said. “The Secret Service will continue to aggressively investigate cyber-enabled financial crimes and develop innovative ways to combat emerging cyber threats.”
 “This indictment is a testament to the countless hours of hard work and dedication by law enforcement in the fight against cyber criminals,” FBI Special Agent in Charge Gregory W. Ehrie said.  “Cybercrime knows no boundaries. Dismantling these operations are possible only by working closely with our partners.”
According to the indictments unsealed today:
From February 2016 to March 2017, Radchenko, Ieremenko, and others conspired to gain unauthorized access to the computer networks of the SEC’s EDGAR system, which is used by publicly traded companies to file required disclosures, such as annual and quarterly earnings reports. These filings contained detailed information about the financial condition and operations of the companies, including their earnings. Such information can, and often does, affect the stock price of the companies when it is made public, and is therefore highly confidential prior to its disclosure to the general public. 
The EDGAR system allows companies to make test filings in advance of a public filing. These test filings often contain information that is the same as, or similar to the information in the final filing. The defendants stole thousands of test filings before they were released to the public, and sought to profit from their theft by using the information in the test filings to trade before the investing public learned the information. 
To gain access to the SEC’s computer networks, the defendants used a series of targeted cyber-attacks, including directory traversal attacks, phishing attacks, and infecting computers with malware. Once the defendants had access to the test filings on the EDGAR system, they stole them by copying the test filings to servers they controlled. For example, between May 2016 and October 2016, the defendants extracted thousands of test filings from the EDGAR servers to a server they controlled in Lithuania.
Ieremenko was previously charged in a hacking and securities fraud scheme in an indictment in the District of New Jersey. That indictment charged Ieremenko with being part of a large-scale, international conspiracy to hack the computer systems of three newswire organizations and steal press releases containing confidential non-public financial information relating to hundreds of companies traded on the NASDAQ and NYSE from three newswires. The members of the conspiracy profited from the theft by trading on the news ahead of its distribution to the investing public. The indictment unsealed today alleges Ieremenko employed some of the same methods to hack the SEC.   
Radchenko recruited to the scheme traders who were provided with the stolen test filings so they could profit by trading on the information before the investing public. Armed with the stolen information, the traders profited by executing various trades in brokerage accounts they controlled. In one instance, a test filing for “Public Company 1” was uploaded to the EDGAR servers at 3:32 p.m. (EDT) on May 19, 2016. Six minutes later, the defendants stole the test filing and uploaded a copy to the Lithuania server. Between 3:42 p.m. and 3:59 p.m., a conspirator purchased approximately $2.4 million worth of shares of Public Company 1. At 4:02 p.m., Public Company 1 released its second quarter earnings report and announced that it expected to deliver record earnings in 2016. Over the next day, the conspirator sold all the acquired shares in Public Company 1 for a profit of more than $270,000.
The wire fraud conspiracy and substantive wire fraud counts with which the defendants are charged carry a maximum potential penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gain or loss from the offense. The securities fraud conspiracy, computer fraud conspiracy, and substantive computer fraud counts with which the defendants are charged carry a maximum potential penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gain or loss from the offense. 
This case was investigated by the U.S. States Secret Service and special agents of the FBI, with assistance from the SEC’s Market Abuse and Cyber Units and the Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs.
 The prosecution is being handled by Trial Attorney Aarash Haghighat of the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS), and by Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Shapiro; Chief of the Cybercrimes Unit Justin S. Herring; Attorney-in-Charge, of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Trenton Nicholas Grippo; and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Lynn O’Connor.
The charges and allegations contained in the indictment are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.   

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, January 11, 2018

DOJ Should Do Onto Perkins Coie As They Have Done Onto Och-Ziff

Besides the fact that Perkins Coie still sucks, it has structured under its SEC application as TWB Partnership, an asset management under the 1940 Investment Company Act.

1940, that is correct, 1940.

The SEC has not been updated of its oversight for mutual funds and hedge funds.

Basically, the way the law is written, the SEC does not have the regulatory authority to call out fraud or any other money laundering activity, which seems that Perkins Coie may be engaging in similar activities as Och-Ziff Capital Management.


DOJ Systematically Takes Down Clinton Foundation Donors


The DOJ should do onto Perkins Coie what they have done onto Och-Ziff, because it is all connected to the Clinton Foundation.

SEC Application of Perkins Coie TWB Investment Partnerships SEC 2008 by Beverly Tran on Scribd



Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, April 23, 2020

Tales Of The New Crown: TARP 3.0 Prepares For TARP 4.0 & 5.0 - The Masked Reparations In Gerrymandering Theirfdom Votes - The Case Of The Missing Quorum

Image may contain: 1 person, sitting
A thief will never remove their masks.
As the masked congress, will soon be 

Select Committee on Cornovirus Oversight has been proposed.

The timing is spectacular considering that Elizabeth Warren made headlines, but not for her seat on the Select Committee on TARP Oversight.

Her Flatulent Boviness, Sheila Jackson Lee has that crown, now.

More money for stealin' the children, land & votes because these re-election campaigns do not pay themselves.

Image may contain: 2 people, people sittingWhat you are hearing is the transposable model, federally funded, for TARP 4.0 & 5.0, reparations, but, before the finale, the masked marauders will pitch the "save the children" - Child Welfare needs more money, for those Targeted Populations that can catch meningitis, you know.

Gerrymandering is real.

Thieves wear masks, and hide behind propaganda.

Happy Child Abuse Propaganda Month!

#maytheheavensfall


A quorum in the House of Representatives is when a majority of the Members are present. When there are no vacancies in the membership, a quorum is 218. When one or more seats are vacant, because of deaths or resignations, the quorum is reduced accordingly. Because of Members' other duties, a quorum often is not present on the House floor. But any Member may insist that a quorum must participate in any vote that takes place in the House. If a Member makes a point of order that a quorum is not present, and the Speaker agrees, a series of bells ring on the House side of the Capitol and in the House office buildings to alert Members to come to the Chamber and record their presence.
If a quorum of 218 Members of the House is necessary to vote which is  ≩ 122 Members of the House who did vote; and,
307 Members did not check in with the Clerk of the House to vote which is ≩ 122 Members of the House who did check in with the Clerk of the House to vote; then,
when is the lawsuit going to be filed on Voting Rights violations?

116th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 935


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 22, 2020
Mr. McGovern submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION
Establishing a Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis as a select investigative subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Reform.

Resolved, That there is hereby established a select investigative subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Reform called the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis (hereinafter referred to as the “select subcommittee”).

Sec. 2. (a) The select subcommittee shall be composed of not more than 12 Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner appointed by the Speaker, of whom not more than 5 shall be appointed on the recommendation of the minority leader. The Speaker shall designate one member of the select subcommittee as its chair. Any vacancy in the select subcommittee shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.

(b) Each member appointed to the select subcommittee shall be treated as though a member of the Committee on Oversight and Reform for purposes of the select subcommittee.

Sec. 3. (a) The select subcommittee is authorized and directed to conduct a full and complete investigation and study and issue a final report to the House of its findings (and such interim reports as it may deem necessary) regarding—

(1) the efficiency, effectiveness, equity, and transparency of the use of taxpayer funds and relief programs to address the coronavirus crisis, including through Federal agencies, State and local government entities, financial institutions and other private businesses, contracts, grants, loans, loan guarantees, investments, cooperative agreements, or any other means;

(2) reports of waste, fraud, abuse, price gouging, profiteering, or other abusive practices related to the coronavirus crisis;

(3) the implementation or effectiveness of any Federal law applied, enacted, or under consideration to address the coronavirus crisis and prepare for future pandemics;

(4) preparedness for and response to the coronavirus crisis, including the planning for and implementation of testing, containment, mitigation, and surveillance activities; the acquisition, distribution, or stockpiling of protective equipment and medical supplies; and the development of vaccines and treatments;

(5) the economic impact of the coronavirus crisis on individuals, communities, small businesses, health care providers, States, and local government entities;

(6) any disparate impacts of the coronavirus crisis on different communities and populations, including with respect to race, ethnicity, age, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, and geographic region, and any measures taken to address such disparate impacts;

(7) executive branch policies, deliberations, decisions, activities, and internal and external communications related to the coronavirus crisis;

(8) the protection of whistleblowers who provide information about waste, fraud, abuse, or other improper activities related to the coronavirus crisis;

(9) cooperation by the executive branch and others with Congress, the Inspectors General, the Government Accountability Office, and others in connection with oversight of the preparedness for and response to the coronavirus crisis; and

(10) any other issues related to the coronavirus crisis.

(b) The select subcommittee may report to the House or any committee of the House from time to time the results of its investigations and studies, together with such detailed findings and legislative recommendations as it may deem advisable.

(c) The select subcommittee may not hold a markup of legislation.

Sec. 4. (a) Rule XI and the rules of the Committee on Oversight and Reform shall apply to the select subcommittee in the same manner as a subcommittee except as follows:

(1) The chair of the select subcommittee may authorize and issue subpoenas pursuant to clause 2(m) of rule XI and rule 12(g) of the rules of the Committee on Oversight and Reform in the investigation and study conducted pursuant to section 3, including for the purpose of taking depositions.

(2) The chair of the select subcommittee is authorized to compel by subpoena the furnishing of information by interrogatory.

(3) Subpoenas so authorized may be signed by the chair of the select subcommittee or a designee.

(4) The chair of the select subcommittee may order the taking of depositions, under oath and pursuant to notice or subpoena, by a member of the select subcommittee or a counsel of the select subcommittee. Such depositions shall be governed by rule 15 of the rules of the Committee on Oversight and Reform. For purposes of such rule, references to “the Committee” shall be construed as references to the select subcommittee.

(5) The chair of the select subcommittee may, after consultation with the ranking minority member, recognize—

(A) members of the select subcommittee to question a witness for periods longer than five minutes as though pursuant to clause 2(j)(2)(B) of such rule XI; and

(B) staff of the select subcommittee to question a witness as though pursuant to clause 2(j)(2)(C) of such rule XI.

(6) Agenda and reports required by rule 2(f) and rule 4(c) of the rules of the Committee on Oversight and Reform shall be required on the third calendar day before a meeting, hearing, or consideration of a report, as applicable.

(b) The provisions of this resolution shall govern the proceedings of the select subcommittee in the event of any conflict with the rules of the House or of the Committee on Oversight and Reform.

Sec. 5. Any committee of the House having custody of records in any form relating to the matters described in section 3 shall transfer copies of such records to the select subcommittee within 7 days of the adoption of this resolution or receipt of such records. Such records shall become the records of the select subcommittee.

Sec. 6. Service on the select subcommittee shall not count against the limitations in clause 5(b)(2)(A) of rule X.

Sec. 7. The Committee on Oversight and Reform is the “successor in interest” to the select subcommittee for purposes of clause 8(c) of rule II.

Sec. 8. The select subcommittee shall cease to exist 30 days after filing the final report required under section 3.

Sec. 9. (a) For further expenses of the Committee on Oversight and Reform for the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, there shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives an additional amount of $2,000,000.

(b) Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized by the Committee on Oversight and Reform, signed by the chair of that committee, and approved in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

Sec. 10. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House Administration.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©