DOJ: Solicitor General Noel Fransico Files SCOTUS DACA, DAPA Briefs To Enjoin Actions In Trafficking Tiny Humans In DC Court Of Appeals - The Sinking Of The Privateers' UCC Ships

The U.S. Solicitor General has filed the following reply briefs in SCOTUS on the  DACA/DAPA, or rather the trafficking of tiny human Petitions for Certiorari to enjoin the cases.

Trump bearing the Arms of the United States by terminating
right of the gold fringe under Admirality Law.

This is about the children's trust funds, child welfare.

Acting U.S. Attorney General Matt Whitaker seems to have some serious Skills, Knowledge & Abilities (SKAs) when it comes to the administration of these actions, so I have to show some love.

This is about U.S. Law, not Admirality Law.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

It is time to sink those UCC ships of "The Privateers" who have been stealin' our children, land and votes for far too long because we are a christian nation.

The Privateers of the Public Private Partnerships of UCC Children's Trust Funds

The time has come to "wall" the National Treasury by tearing down the "wall" of the Vatican that holds the Children's Trusts, without our consent.

This is about foster care and adoption.

This is about ending Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare.

This is the residuals of the peculiar institution and it all started in Detroit.

   Fiat justitia ruat caelum

Happy National Adoption Month: TRUMP v. NAACP Petition For Certiorari To SCOTUS On Trafficking Tiny Humans - DACA, DAPA

Happy National Adoption Month: SCOTUS - DHS v. States Children's Trust Funds On Trafficking Tiny Humans - DACA, DAPA Privatization Policies Of Fraud

3. At a minimum, the Court should hold this petition pending resolution of the Regents petition and any further proceedings before this Court. Because the district court here issued a nationwide injunction identical to the one in Regents, an order vacating the injunction in Regents would have no immediate practical effect unless the injunction issued here is also vacated. Holding this petition (or granting it) is the most efficient way to accomplish that result. Pet. 16-17.

KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRET... by on Scribd

When this Court declined to grant certiorari before judgment to review the district court’s injunction requiring the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to maintain the non-enforcement policy known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), the Court made clear that it expected the court of appeals to “proceed expeditiously to decide this case,” at which time the government could renew its request. 2/26/18 Order (No. 17-1003). More than ten months later, the court of appeals’ judgment is here and the Court is presented the opportunity it anticipated in February. The Court should now grant certiorari and resolve this important dispute this Term.

SCOTUS UNITED STATES DEPART... by on Scribd

1. In September 2017, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) determined, in accordance with the views of the Attorney General, that the non-enforcement policy known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) was likely unlawful and should be wound down in an orderly fashion. Such a quintessential exercise of the Secretary of Homeland Security’s authority to establish “national immigration enforcement policies and priorities,” 6 U.S.C. 202(5) (2012 & Supp. V 2017), is not judicially reviewable and was eminently reasonable in any event. See Pet. 17-31, United States DHS v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., No. 18-587 (Nov. 5, 2018); Reply Br. 6-11, Regents, supra (No. 18-587). Yet DHS has been compelled by two nationwide preliminary injunctions to retain the unlawful policy and thereby sanction the continuing violation of federal immigration law by nearly 700,000 aliens.

Trump v NAACP SCOTUS Petiti... by on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©