Religious Liberty & Child Welfare Task Forces Enjoin To End The Trafficking Of Tiny Humans

From out favorite former law enforcement officer, Task Force, comes another episode of the slow descent into the deep, dark abyss of child welfare.

Now, from my other favorite law enforcement officer, comes the Religious Liberty Task Force, courtesy of U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Jeff is going after what I like to call the trafficking of tiny humans, in the name of the tax exempt god.

DOJ: Sessions Calls Out Christians On Their Child Welfare Hypocracies

The Legend Of A Mighty General, Jeff Sessions & His Mission To End The Trafficking Of Tiny Humans

Jeff is on a mission to preserve institutions, and in this instance, religious institutions, because christianity has been weaponized for the privateering of children, land and votes, for far too many centuries.

Task Forces are exactly what they seem, and in this instance, it these "christians" used the Religious Freedom Restoration Act for their personal profitting through money laundering, child welfare fraud (i.e. education, infant mortality, child poverty, schools) human trafficking, drugs, gun running, dark research, mortgage fraud, oh, the list goes on and on.

One of the largest, intentionally omitted from public discussion are the domestic and international Faith Based Funding Intitiatives, created under the Daddy Bush Administration, which were, and still are to this day, slush funds to buy candidates, generate propaganda and manipulate elections, just to keep their complex financial fraud schemes alive.

Introducing, the "other" Task Force.

This is about human trafficking, the residuals of the peculiar institution.

Do not ever be confused.

Attorney General Sessions Delivers Remarks at the Department of Justice’s Religious Liberty Summit

Monday, July 30, 2018

Remarks as prepared for delivery

Thank you, Beth, for that generous introduction and thank you for your outstanding leadership at the Office of Legal Policy.

I want to thank Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and our acting Associate Attorney General, Jesse Pannuccio, for their leadership, as well.

Thank you to Dorothy Williams from the Civil Rights Division for sharing your beautiful voice with us and singing our national anthem.

And thank you to Archbishop Kurtz, my good friend Senator Lankford, as well as all of our panelists: Acting Assistant Attorney General John Gore, Kerri Kupec, Derrick Max, Professor McConnell, Asma Uddin, Shay Dvoretzky, Emilie Kao, and of course Jack Phillips.

I want to thank all of you for your courage and insight to speak out for religious liberty.

Let us be frank.

A dangerous movement, undetected by many, is now challenging and eroding our great tradition of religious freedom. There can be no doubt. This is no little matter. It must be confronted and defeated.

This election, and much that has flowed from it, gives us a rare opportunity to arrest these trends.  Such a reversal will not just be done with electoral victories, but by intellectual victories.

We have gotten to the point where courts have held that morality cannot be a basis for law; where ministers are fearful to affirm, as they understand it, holy writ from the pulpit; and where one group can actively target religious groups by labeling them a “hate group” on the basis of their sincerely held religious beliefs.

This President and this Department of Justice are determined to protect and even advance this magnificent heritage.

Freedom of religious is indeed our “first freedom”—being the first listed right of our First Amendment.

This has been a core American principle from the beginning.

It is one of the reasons that this country was settled in the first place.

The promise of freedom of conscience brought the Pilgrims to Plymouth, the Catholics to Maryland, the Quakers to Pennsylvania, the Scot-Presbyterians to the middle colonies, and Roger Williams to Rhode Island.

Each one of these groups and others knew what it was like to be hated, persecuted, outnumbered, and discriminated against.

Each one knew what it was like to have a majority try to force them to deny their natural right to practice the faith they held dear.

Our Founders gave religious expression a double protection in the First Amendment.  Not only do we possess freedom to exercise our beliefs but we also enjoy the freedom of speech.

Our Founders’ understanding of and commitment to religious freedom was truly brilliant as well as historic.

It arose in large part from the principals delineated in the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom—and its effective advocates: Madison and Jefferson.

These guys were ferocious. This weekend, I was rereading Gary Will’s fabulous book, Head and Heart, in which he quotes extensively from the Jefferson’s Statute, as he refers to it.

I commend all of it to you; but one line stood out in particular to me, “That almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested His supreme will that free it shall remain, by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint.”

Of course, this is entirely consistent with another of my favorite Jefferson quotes that you will find at his memorial just across the mall from where we are today:

"For I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." This is what our Founders believed.

They clearly recognized that an individual’s relationship to God is a natural right and precedes the existence of the state, and is not subject to state control.

These concepts were placed into our Constitution and laws and formed a national consensus that has greatly militated against religious hostility and violence—and has helped us to this day to be one of the world’s most diverse religious people.

There can be no doubt that we are stronger as a nation because of the contribution of religious Americans.

Every day across America, they feed the hungry, shelter the homeless, educate our young people, and care for the sick.  They do so not because the government tells them to, but because they want to.  They do these things because of their faith.

Their faith provides something the state can never provide—meaning and purpose and joy in their life.

But in recent years, the cultural climate in this country—and in the West more generally—has become less hospitable to people of faith. Many Americans have felt that their freedom to practice their faith has been under attack.

And it’s easy to see why.  We’ve seen nuns ordered to buy contraceptives.

We’ve seen U.S. Senators ask judicial and executive branch nominees about dogma—even though the Constitution explicitly forbids a religious test for public office.  We’ve all seen the ordeal faced so bravely by Jack Phillips.

Americans from a wide variety of backgrounds are concerned about what this changing cultural climate means for the future of religious liberty in this country.

President Trump heard this concern.

I believe this unease is one reason that he was elected.  In substance, he said he respected people of faith and he promised to protect them in the free exercise of their faith.  He declared we would say “Merry Christmas” again.

The Department of Justice has settled 24 civil cases with 90 plaintiffs regarding the previous administration’s wrong application of the contraception mandate to objecting religious employers.

Last month, a district court in Colorado issued a permanent injunction in the case involving the Little Sisters of the Poor, a group of nuns who serve the elderly poor.

This is a permanent injunction and a major victory for the Little Sisters of the Poor and religious freedom.

The government has no business telling the Little Sisters that they must provide an insurance policy that violates their sincere religious beliefs.

And since day one, this administration has been delivering on that promise.

Soon after taking office, President Trump directed me to issue explicit legal guidance for all executive agencies on how to apply the religious liberty protections in federal law.  Our team embraced that challenge.

I issued that guidance in October, and it lays out 20 fundamental principles for the Executive Branch to follow.

Those include the principle that free exercise means a right to act—or to abstain from action.

They include the principle that government shouldn’t impugn people’s motives or beliefs.

We don’t give up our rights when we go to work, start a business, talk about politics, or interact with the government.

We don’t give up our rights when we assemble or join together.  We have religious freedom as individuals and as groups.

In short, we have not only the freedom to worship—but the right to exercise our faith.  The Constitution’s protections don’t end at the parish parking lot nor can our freedoms be confined to our basements.

Under this administration, the federal government is not just reacting—we are actively seeking, carefully, thoughtfully and lawfully, to accommodate people of faith.  Religious Americans are no longer an afterthought.

We will take potential burdens on one’s conscience into consideration before we issue regulations or new policies.

And this Department of Justice is going to court across America to defend the rights of people of faith.

First of all, we are aggressively and appropriately enforcing our civil rights laws, our hate crimes laws, and laws protecting churches and faith groups.

Since January 2017, we have obtained 11 indictments and seven convictions in cases involving arson or other attacks or threats against houses of worship.  Our Civil Rights Division has also obtained 12 indictments in other attacks or threats against people because of their religion.

And we are not slowing down.

Three weeks ago, we obtained a jury verdict against a man who set fire to a mosque in Texas and sentenced for a man from Missouri for threatening to kill members of a mosque.

In addition to protecting the safety of people of faith, we are also protecting them against unjust discrimination.

In January, we filed a brief in a Montana court to defend parents who claim that the state barred their children from a private school scholarship program because they attend a religious school.

We also filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Archdiocese of Washington, D.C., which was refused advertising space for having a religious message—including “joy to the world” on Merry Christmas.

And, of course, we were proud to file a brief in support of Jack Phillips.

We are taking steps to become even more effective.

In June I announced the Place to Worship Initiative.  Under this initiative, the Department of Justice is holding public events across America and improving training for federal prosecutors about legal protections for houses of worship.

When I was in the Senate, we passed a law called the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, or RLUIPA.  Under RLUIPA, the Department of Justice can file a civil action in court when religious groups are discriminated against in zoning laws.

Under my tenure as Attorney General, we have not hesitated to use this tool when necessary.

In June, we filed suit against a town in New Jersey that had refused over and over again—for eight years—to let an Orthodox Jewish congregation buy land for a synagogue.

And just last week we filed a brief in federal court supporting the case of a Hindu temple in Maryland that claimed to have suffered discrimination in its attempts to purchase land.

We are going to keep going to court.  And I believe that we’re going to keep winning.

Today I am announcing our next step: the Religious Liberty Task Force, to be co-chaired by the Associate Attorney General and the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Policy—Jesse and Beth.

The Task Force will help the Department fully implement our religious liberty guidance by ensuring that all Justice Department components are upholding that guidance in the cases they bring and defend, the arguments they make in court, the policies and regulations they adopt, and how we conduct our operations.  That includes making sure that our employees know their duties to accommodate people of faith.

As the people in this room know, you have to practice what you preach. We are also going to remain in contact with religious groups across America to ensure that their rights are being protected.  We have been holding listening sessions and we will continue to host them in the coming weeks.

This administration is animated by that same American view that has led us for 242 years: that every American has a right to believe, worship, and exercise their faith in the public square.

This approach has served this country well. We are perhaps the most religiously developed nation in the world and can take pride in respecting all people as they fully exercise their faiths.

It is clear that these policies have furthered peace, prosperity, freedom, lawfulness, and clarity.

As our nation grows order, we must not let it depart from this magnificent tradition.

Now I have the pleasure of introducing Archbishop Joseph Kurtz, someone who is an expert on these matters.

Archbishop Kurtz was ordained a priest of the Diocese of Allentown in 1972.  Over the next two decades he served in a variety of capacities in the Diocese, including teaching at two seminaries.

He was named a Monsignor in 1986 and appointed a pastor in 1988.

In 1999 Pope John Paul II appointed him Bishop of Knoxville and in 2007 Pope Benedict XVI appointed him Archbishop of Louisville, where he now leads the oldest inland diocese in the United States and the oldest Archdiocese West of the Appalachias.

In 2010 he was elected Vice President of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and then served as President from 2013 to 2016.

In 2017 he was elected chairman of the Conference’s Committee for Religious Liberty.

Please join me in welcoming Archbishop Joseph Kurtz.

RELIGIOUS LAND USE AND INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ACT

Call the Civil Rights Division to report religious discrimination. 202-514-4609

Report religious discrimination under RLUIPA(link sends e-mail)

Send an email describing your experience or the experience of someone you know to the Civil Rights Division. You can give as much or as little information as you like. If you provide a phone number, we will call you back. To mail a RLUIPA complaint, click here for our address.

What happens when I report?

Place to Worship Initiative website

"Have a great day!"

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

The Holy See Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution - Part Two - Civil Rights & Chattel Law - DOJ Issues Spoliation Letter To Conference Of Catholic Bishops

Concordia discordantium canonum
The First Civil Rights Database
(NOTE TO SELF:
 DNA ENCRYPTED BLOCKCHAIN TRUSTS)     

The sanctity of society, under canon law, in the constructs of chattels, is the premise of civil rights, in equal access to justice under the administrative structures of chattel law.

Civil rights, as we understand, was the so-called answer to the ownership of chattels through the decree of consent, where one owns nothing but controls the chattels, perhaps, more intuitively understood as the right of civilization, a transposable model to set up a government under decree of the church.

Civil rights was the constraints of property ownership in establishing the administrative structure of the principle agent doctrine, designed in the early christian church, to delineate powers of the allodial title of tiny humans, or rather the kingdom.

The principle agent structure was one by appointment of the pope to authorize someone to function under the chattel laws of the land, the delegation of authority to administer, or rather formulate uniform law instruments, principles and rules to achieve those objectives.

And we are to remember that Abraham and his seed, for four hundred years, had no warrant to admit any stranger into that church, but by buying of him as a servant, with money. And it was a great privilege to be bought, and adopted into a religious family for seven years, and then to have their freedom. And that covenant was expressly repealed in various parts of the New Testament, and particularly in the First Epistle to the Corinthians, where it is said, "Ye are bought with a price; therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's." And again, "Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but keeping of the commandments of God. Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men." Thus the gospel sets all men upon a level, very contrary to the declaration of an honorable gentleman in this house, that "the Bible was contrived for the advantage of a particular order of men."

Debates of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on the adoption of  the Federal Constitution, In Convention, Boston January 9, 1788 

These legal constraints of chattel law were basically to stop war, which was how a kingdom was expanded through slavery, human trafficking, potato, potato, in the implementation a tripartite structure, where the people pray to the agents of the principle, which can be understood as courts are equity.

Asset forfeiture is a civil right, not a criminal constraint, just remember that.

Slavery is really just a tiered system of access, and exit, to full rights of citizenship in a society, like in the right to vote which can be terminated, under the transposed model of chattel law, with many paths of constraint to parental rights of the chattel to procure and purvey private interests, as would see today as privatization.

This is the very first child welfare decree of consent, issued as marques to privateers, to engage in the acquisition of goods and the purveying of the chattels.

“We weighing all and singular the premises with due meditation, and noting that since we had formerly by other letters of ours granted among other things free and ample faculty to the aforesaid King Alfonso -- to invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed, and the kingdoms, dukedoms, principalities, dominions, possessions, and all movable and immovable goods whatsoever held and possessed by them and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery, and to apply and appropriate to himself and his successors the kingdoms, dukedoms, counties, principalities, dominions, possessions, and goods, and to convert them to his and their use and profit -- by having secured the said faculty, the said King Alfonso, or, by his authority, the aforesaid infante, justly and lawfully has acquired and possessed, and doth possess, these islands, lands, harbors, and seas, and they do of right belong and pertain to the said King Alfonso and his successors”. 

Amen

Papal Bull Dum Diversas

18 June, 1452 

If, in any instance, these constraints of chattel law were violated, the chattel reverts through default to the allodial title powers of the church, on behalf of the king, instead of a bloody battle in the streets over who owned whom, including women, land and tiny humans, which some may recognize as family law.

The tradition of child marriage as a civil right
of selling chattel (i.e. foster care & adoption)

Relevant texts from Decretum gratiani:

Betrothals cannot be contracted before the seventh year. For they can be contracted only with consent, which requires each party to understand what they agree to. This proves that betrothals cannot be contracted between children, because the debility of age prevents consent. (Decretum gratiani, Case 30, q II)

Marriage cannot be contracted before the age of consent. 

Where there is no mutual consent, there is no marriage. Therefore, to give boys to girls in their cradles, or vice versa, accomplishes nothing, even if the father and mother do it and desire it, unless both children consent after reaching the age of discretion. (Decretum gratiani, Case 30, q II. C1)

Basically, life expectancy was not very long so they liked to start procreation at young ages to increase population and maximize production of a kingdom, or what was called a family after feudal law became passe' when it came to tithing children to the church for tax debts, just like they still do with children and land under county administered abuse & neglect laws.

This is why I keep saying it is #Time2AuditGod, because they are the administrators who control the law through privatization, held accountable, entitled to full immunities under commerce in chattel of UCCs.

Seriously, listen to the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) argue on behalf of the chattel system of land, for land and children are fungible under doctrines of property law, as the deeds are moveable chattel under civil rights, addressed, equally, under the UCC through UNIDROIT.

The International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) is an independent intergovernmental Organisation with its seat in the Villa Aldobrandini in Rome. Its purpose is to study needs and methods for modernising, harmonising and co-ordinating private and in particular commercial law as between States and groups of States and to formulate uniform law instruments, principles and rules to achieve those objectives.

Eminent Domain and Property Rights Legal experts testified at a hearing on H.R. 1689, the Private Property Rights Protection Act. The bill would preserve constitutional protections for property owners following a Supreme Court eminent domain decision in the case of Kelo v. City of New London. Subcommittee members and witnesses discussed various applications of eminent domain in several states and debated what the Constitution does or does not protect in terms of private property owners' rights and state and local governments' ability to take privately owned land for public use or benefit.

FUN FACT! THE CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS IS A PRIVATE ORGANIZATION, HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO NO ONE BECAUSE THEY ARE THE JUDGE AND JURY

U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Senate Letter to U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Elie Wies... by Beverly Tran on Scribd

A trademark for the child welfare propaganda.

Word Mark	UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS
Goods and Services	IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Pre recorded videos featuring information about the catholic religion and news stories and photographs from a catholic perspective. FIRST USE: 20010701. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20010701(CANCELLED) IC 014. US 002 027 028 050. G & S: [ wrist watches ]. FIRST USE: 20010701. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20010701 IC 016. US 002 005 022 023 029 037 038 050. G & S: printed educational materials, namely, informational bulletins, newsletters, periodicals, books, charts, exhibits and brochures containing information about the catholic religion and news stories and photographs from a catholic perspective; and pens. FIRST USE: 20010701. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20010701 IC 036. US 100 101 102. G & S: human development grants, namely providing grants to needy individuals and religious organizations; and charitable fund raising services. FIRST USE: 20010701. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20010701 IC 041. US 100 101 107. G & S: entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs related to the catholic religion; educational services, namely classes, seminars, conferences, workshops and training programs related to the catholic religion; organizing meetings and cultural events related to the catholic religion; and providing on-line non-downloadable print publications in the nature of informational bulletins, newsletters, periodicals, books, charts, exhibits and brochures containing information about the catholic religion and news stories and photographs from a catholic perspective; and providing information via a global computer information network featuring news features and photographs of current events from a catholic perspective. FIRST USE: 20010701. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20010701 IC 045. US 100 101. G & S: religious services, namely, ministerial and counseling services. FIRST USE: 20010701. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20010701
Mark Drawing Code	(3) DESIGN PLUS WORDS, LETTERS, AND/OR NUMBERS
Design Search Code	24.13.02 - Cross, Greek (equal sides); Greek cross (equal sized lines) 24.13.25 - Cross, ankh; Cross, Maltese; Other crosses, including ankh, Maltese 26.01.03 - Circles, incomplete (more than semi-circles); Incomplete circles (more than semi-circles) 26.01.08 - Circles having letters or numerals as a border; Circles having punctuation as a border; Letters, numerals or punctuation forming or bordering the perimeter of a circle 26.01.12 - Circles with bars, bands and lines 26.05.25 - Triangles with one or more curved sides
Serial Number	76413896
Filing Date	May 29, 2002
Current Basis	1A
Original Filing Basis	1A
Published for Opposition	May 20, 2003
Change In Registration	CHANGE IN REGISTRATION HAS OCCURRED
Registration Number	2749802
Registration Date	August 12, 2003
Owner	(REGISTRANT) United States Conference of Catholic Bishops CORPORATION D.C. 3211 4th Street, N.E. Washington D.C. 200171194
Attorney of Record	Anne M Sterba
Disclaimer	NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS" in relation to the goods and services in international classes 16, 36, 41 and 45 APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN
Type of Mark	TRADEMARK. SERVICE MARK
Register	PRINCIPAL
Affidavit Text	SECT 15. SECT 8 (6-YR). PARTIAL SECTION 8(10-YR) 20130823.
Renewal	1ST RENEWAL 20130823
Live/Dead Indicator	LIVE

A trademark for child welfare fraud.

Word Mark	CONFERENCIA DE OBISPOS CATÓLICOS DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS
Translations	The English translation of "CONFERENCIA DE OBISPOS CATÓLICOS DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS is CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS OF THE UNITED STATES".
Goods and Services	IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: PRE RECORDED VIDEOS FEATURING INFORMATION ABOUT THE CATHOLIC RELIGION AND NEWS STORIES AND PHOTOGRAPHS FROM A CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVE. FIRST USE: 20080912. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20080912IC 016. US 002 005 022 023 029 037 038 050. G & S: PRINTED EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS, NAMELY, INFORMATIONAL BULLETINS, NEWSLETTERS, PERIODICALS, BOOKS, CHARTS, EXHIBITS AND BROCHURES CONTAINING INFORMATION ABOUT THE CATHOLIC RELIGION AND NEWS STORIES AND PHOTOGRAPHS FROM A CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVE; AND PENS. FIRST USE: 19970901. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19970901 IC 036. US 100 101 102. G & S: HUMAN DEVELOPMENT GRANTS, NAMELY, PROVIDING GRANTS TO NEEDY INDIVIDUALS AND RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS; AND CHARITABLE FUND RAISING SERVICES. FIRST USE: 20080912. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20080912 IC 041. US 100 101 107. G & S: ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF ON-GOING TELEVISION PROGRAMS RELATED TO THE CATHOLIC RELIGION; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, namely, CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS AND TRAINING PROGRAMS RELATED TO THE CATHOLIC RELIGION; ORGANIZING MEETINGS AND CULTURAL EVENTS RELATED TO THE CATHOLIC RELIGION; AND PROVIDING ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE PRINT PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF INFORMATIONAL BULLETINS, NEWSLETTERS, PERIODICALS, BOOKS, CHARTS, EXHIBITS AND BROCHURES CONTAINING INFORMATION ABOUT THE CATHOLIC RELIGION AND NEWS STORIES AND PHOTOGRAPHS FROM A CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVE; AND PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK FEATURING NEWS FEATURES AND PHOTOGRAPHS OF CURRENT EVENTS FROM A CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVE. FIRST USE: 20080912. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20080912 IC 045. US 100 101. G & S: RELIGIOUS SERVICES, namely, MINISTERIAL AND COUNSELING SERVICES. FIRST USE: 20080912. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20080912
Mark Drawing Code	(3) DESIGN PLUS WORDS, LETTERS, AND/OR NUMBERS
Design Search Code	24.13.02 - Cross, Greek (equal sides); Greek cross (equal sized lines) 26.01.08 - Circles having letters or numerals as a border; Circles having punctuation as a border; Letters, numerals or punctuation forming or bordering the perimeter of a circle 26.01.12 - Circles with bars, bands and lines 26.01.17 - Circles, two concentric; Concentric circles, two; Two concentric circles 26.01.21 - Circles that are totally or partially shaded.
Trademark Search Facility Classification Code	NOTATION-SYMBOLS Notation Symbols such as Non-Latin characters,punctuation and mathematical signs,zodiac signs,prescription marks SHAPES-CIRCLE Circle figures or designs including semi-circles and incomplete circles SHAPES-CROSSES Cross or cross-like designs SHAPES-TRIANGLES Triangular shaped designs and marks including incomplete triangles
Serial Number	77123277
Filing Date	March 6, 2007
Current Basis	1A
Original Filing Basis	1B
Published for Opposition	September 11, 2007
Registration Number	3669784
Registration Date	August 18, 2009
Owner	(REGISTRANT) United States Conference of Catholic Bishops CORPORATION D.C. 3211 4th Street, N.E. Washington D.C. 200171194
Attorney of Record	Anne M. Sterba
Prior Registrations	2749802
Disclaimer	NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "CONFERENCIA DE OBISPOS CATÓLICOS DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN
Description of Mark	Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
Type of Mark	TRADEMARK. SERVICE MARK
Register	PRINCIPAL
Affidavit Text	SECT 15. SECT 8 (6-YR).
Live/Dead Indicator	LIVE

Where, if you do not know, are the chattels of the States Children's Trust Funds, first established in Kansas as UCC, registered in the States under other UCCs of foreign corporations which are financially leveraged through Children's Investment Trust Fund in the instrument of the patent & trademark liens in real estate?

The allodial title to the christian real estate holdings seems may be in the process of reconveyance to Israel.

For better understanding of this concept of foreign interests controlling our government in complex, financial fraud schemes, please refer to the work of the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) who set up the Detroit Land Bank Authority.

President of Catholic Bishops Conference Joins Other U.S. Church Leaders in Expressing Strong Concern Over Israel’s Plan to Tax Church-owned Real Estate

President of Catholic Bishops Conference Joins Other U.S. Church Leaders in Expressing Strong Concern Over... by Beverly Tran on Scribd

This very same model of asset forfeiture of chattels, in personae, I like to refer to as legacies, has been in existence for some time in the form of the re-animation of tithing, of a child, or rather the revocation of the gift of God in the grant of custody and guardianship of the posterity, to continue the constraints of chattels, the law in the stations of society, they set up with their fancy child welfare NGO Public Private Partnerships that do nothing but more stealin' children, the land and the votes.

https://www.crs.org/

When a child goes into the custody of the courts or aegis of the states, there is a judicial mechanism which issues a decree of consent to transfer the controlling instrument, in this instance, the birth certificate and Social Security Number, through an administrative process, for the purposes of opening that federal funding spigot of Medicaid to a realm of spiritual ecstasy in their new found ways of stealin' with the blessings of the tax exempt god through foster care and adoption, or what I prefer to call the industry of trafficking tiny humans.

https://www.ccwestmi.org/

For those of you who are just now learning that the U.S. Department of Justice is investigating the Catholic Dioceses and the Vatican into sexual abuse of children, allow me to expound upon what is actually under investigation.

Child welfare, the history of chattels.

I found this all out when I received a letter of apology for what was done in Michigan foster care, signed by the law firm representing the Holy See.

Welcome to my mission...

All Hail The Whistleblowers: Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro Announces Grand Jury Report Of Sexual Abuse Of Children By Catholic Dioceses & Vatican

Virginia joins other states investigating possible sexual abuse by Catholic clergy

Illinois Catholic Trafficking Of Tiny Humans Is Coming To Michigan

Michigan Auditor General Begins Its Dark Decent Into The Christian World Of Trafficking Tiny Humans

Mother Teresa & The Trafficking Of Tiny Humans

The Holy See Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution - Part One

Federal Government Tells Catholic Bishops Not to Destroy Sex Abuse Documents

The Department of Justice has sent a sweeping request to every Roman Catholic diocese in the United States not to destroy documents related to the handling of child sexual abuse, a sign that the federal investigation into the church could grow far more extensive.

Catholic bishops have been asked by the federal government to retain their files on a broad array of internal matters, including sexual abuse investigations, and the transfer of priests across state or international borders, or to treatment centers. The request includes documents contained in “secret archives” — the confidential files that are kept by each diocese.

News reports last week revealed that the Justice Department had opened an investigation into all eight Catholic dioceses in Pennsylvania, and the diocese of Buffalo in New York. This marked the first time the federal government had undertaken an investigation of the church’s handling of abusive priests, a scandal that surfaced in the United States in the mid-1980s.

But this request to preserve files, first disclosed by Whispers in the Loggia, a site that closely follows the Catholic hierarchy, suggests that federal investigators are throwing a very wide net. The abuse scandal, long fueled by the shocking details in the church’s own personnel documents, may now grow like an uncontrolled wildfire.

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/feds-order-bishops-not-to-destroy-documents-related-to-sex-abuse

“Every diocese should assume that it is potentially under investigation,” said Marci A. Hamilton, a law professor and founder of CHILD USA, a think tank at the University of Pennsylvania that studies child sexual abuse and prevention. “Given the crisscrossing paths of priests sent from one diocese to another across the United States, I can understand why someone in Washington would say, ‘O.K., everybody needs to hold onto their evidence right now because we’re just starting to sketch out where the pedophiles have been sent by the hierarchy.’”

Abuse victims have despaired for years that the church in the United States would never be called to fully account for the perpetrators and the people they violated. There have been government-run inquiries in countries like Australia and Ireland, but the federal government in the United States has been reluctant to intervene, until now. The letter from the United States attorney suggested only the potential of a broader investigation, but abuse victims greeted it as a turning point nevertheless.

“It’s going to bring tears to my eyes just thinking about it,” said Tim Lennon, president of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. “It’s hopefully the beginning of a process of long-awaited justice. For survivors, it’s been a long road to bring those who have harmed children and the vulnerable to justice.”

The request to the bishops was contained in a seven-page letter and set of instructions from United States Attorney William M. McSwain, of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and sent to the president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston. The letter, dated Oct. 9, asked that Cardinal DiNardo “immediately transmit copies” to all dioceses in the United States. The bishops conference then sent it to the dioceses on Oct. 23.

Mr. McSwain said in his letter that at this point there was “no need” for the bishops to produce any documents “solely on account of this letter.” He said that the letter was only a request that the church entities “not destroy, discard, dispose of, delete, or alter any of the described documents.” But he started his letter by saying that his office was “investigating possible violations of federal law.”

The general counsel of the bishops’ conference, Anthony R. Picarello Jr., warned in a cover letter to the bishops that the request was “very broad.” Mr. Picarello wrote that the bishops conference had taken steps to preserve its documents, and advised the dioceses to do the same. But he said he had told the United States attorney that the bishops’ conference “lacks the authority” to make sure that the dioceses retain their documents.

In a statement on Friday, Mr. Picarello said, “We have transmitted the U.S. Attorney’s letter at his request and in the spirit of cooperation with law enforcement.” His office said he was unavailable for a telephone interview.

Mr. Lennon said that two groups advocating for survivors first asked the federal government for an investigation in 2003. He said that survivors asked again in 2014 and in August of this year, after a Pennsylvania grand jury released a report that found more than 300 priests had abused over 1,000 children in a 70-year period.

Since then, attorneys general in at least a dozen states have opened investigations into whether their local dioceses engaged in cover-ups of priests and other church employees who sexually abused minors. The District of Columbia and Virginia announced investigations this past week.

Many dioceses have already said they will cooperate with local prosecutors, and they are likely to take the same stance in relation to the request to preserve their documents.

“We’re doing that anyway,” said Penny Wiegert, director of communications and publications for the Diocese of Rockford, in Illinois, “because we’re cooperating with our own Illinois state attorney, and we have our own documentation retention protocol anyway.”

But in the past, several dioceses have been accused of destroying fileson abusive priests, according to BishopAccountability.org, a research and advocacy group. Some church employees, including priests, nuns and lay people, have been responsible for blowing the whistle when documents were discarded or shredded, noted David Clohessy, a founder of the survivors network.

He said on Friday, “We applaud this move and hope it prevents the destruction of incriminating records that could lead to the prosecution of clerics who commit or conceal horrific child sex crimes.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

The Battle Of Parental Rights - The Michigan Child Welfare System - St. Vincent & Bethany Christian Trafficking Tiny Humans - DOJ Intervenes In Illinois

This has nothing to do with sex.

This is about parental rights.

People fail to understand that the States Attorney General possesses the parental right, under commerce, in this particular situation, trafficking tiny humans.

This is about chattel law because we are dealing with land, and children are attached to the land, which uncloaks another layer in the residuals of the peculiar institution.

For some, this is about human asset management.

One side wants degenderfication for investments, the other side wants to conserve their hierarchic human property ownership structure of chattels.

Children are attached to the land as immovable chattels, but the soul is the movable chattel, better understood as the birth certificate, the identity, the one thing necessary for billing to Medicaid.

If St. Vincent and Bethany Christian lose their ability to acquire goods, their institutions would not be eligible to meet their contractual obligations with DHS and ICE, in warehousing, transportation and distribution of all those border babies.

I bet "The Boys" over there at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops got The Saddy Faces right now because another federal judge has made another ruling, allowing the DOJ to file a Statement of Interest in a similar subject matter case.

This is about the children's trusts.

Justice Department Files Statement of Interest in Indiana Lawsuit Brought by Former Teacher Against Archdiocese

The Justice Department today filed a Statement of Interest explaining that the First Amendment protects the right of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Indianapolis to interpret and apply Catholic doctrine. The lawsuit was brought against the Archdiocese by a former teacher who was fired from a Catholic high school within the diocese because he was in a same-sex marriage in contradiction to Catholic teaching on marriage. The Archdiocese indicated that the school had to terminate the teacher, or the school would forfeit its Catholic identity, which would have led to several repercussions for the school.

“The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of religious institutions and people to decide what their beliefs are, to teach their faith, and to associate with others who share their faith,” said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband for the Civil Rights Division. “The First Amendment rightly protects the free exercise of religion.” 

“If the First Amendment’s Religion Clauses stand for anything, it is that secular courts cannot entangle themselves in questions of religious law,” said United States Attorney Josh Minkler.   

This case stems from a directive issued by the Archdiocese to Cathedral High School, a Catholic school in Indianapolis. The Archdiocese told Cathedral that the school’s continued employment of a teacher in a public, same-sex marriage in contradiction to Catholic teachings on marriage would result in Cathedral’s forfeiture of its Catholic identity. After much deliberation, the school terminated the teacher. The teacher then filed suit against the Archdiocese, claiming the directive to Cathedral interfered with his employment and his contractual relationship with the school.  

The government explains in the Statement of Interest that the First Amendment prevents courts from impairing the constitutional rights of religious institutions. The former teacher’s lawsuit attempts to penalize the Archdiocese for determining that schools within its diocese cannot employ teachers in public, same-sex marriages, and simultaneously identify as Catholic. Supreme Court precedent clearly holds that the First Amendment protects the Archdiocese’s right to this form of expressive association, and courts cannot interfere with that right.

The Statement of Interest also makes clear that courts cannot second-guess how religious institutions interpret and apply their own religious laws. Supreme Court precedent explains that the First Amendment forbids courts from engaging in “quintessentially religious controversies.” Instead, as the Statement of Interest explains, “the legitimacy of the Archdiocese’s decision as a matter of Catholic law” is committed exclusively “to the judgment of the Archdiocese.”   

In July 2018, the Department of Justice announced the formation of the Religious Liberty Task Force. The Task Force brings together Department components to coordinate their work on religious liberty litigation and policy, and to implement the Attorney General’s 2017 Religious Liberty Guidance.

DOJ Payne-Elliott - Statement of Interest in Indiana Lawsuit Brought by Former Teacher Against Illinois Ar... by Beverly Tran on Scribd

Here is another federal judge who had an issue with indefinite holding of children in state facilities.

Indentured servitude is traditionally contracted in seven year incrementswith 90 day dispositional cycles.

Dana is slated to be placed in a similar, strategic, legal position, as the DOJ has just done, if she just so happens to file an enjoinder with Statement of Interest in previous federal cases in dealing with the Brothers of St. Vincent and the Daughters of Charity, or something wily creative to that effect.

Robert Jonker is the judge who halted the rules, promulgated from the law.

Robert Jonker

Federal judge halts Michigan's new gay adoption rulesRobert James Jonker (born March 9, 1960) is the Chief United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan.
Born in Holland, Michigan, Jonker received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Calvin College in 1982 and a Juris Doctor from the University of Michigan Law School in 1985. He was a law clerk for Judge John F. Feikens of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, from 1985 to 1987. He was in private practice in Grand Rapids, Michigan, from 1987 to 2007.
On March 19, 2007, Jonker was nominated by President George W. Bush to a seat on the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan vacated by Gordon Jay Quist. Jonker was confirmed by the United States Senate on July 9, 2007, and received his commission on July 16, 2007. He became Chief Judge in 2015.

Here is a bit of background on the christian legal battles of marriage.

Here is a fun little rubric to play with during the course of this uncloaking:

If two individuals are of the same "sex" (not broaching definitive legal measurement tools for the distinctions of phenotype and genotype), what is the citizenship of the adopted child?

Better yet, what is the race of the child, considering they like to lump and dump in crappy predictive modeling variables of race, since we still use race classifications, one of those pesky residuals of the peculiar institution. 

It is called "Right of the Womb".

This is about the re-animation of the peculiar institution while battling for their stake in those economic redevelopment funds, because they are going broke from stealin' the children, land and votes.

Gerrymandering.

Federal judge halts Michigan's new gay adoption rules

A Grand Rapids federal judge has halted a new state policy that bans state contracts with foster and adoption agencies that refuse to work with gay couples.

The state’s settlement and comments made by Democratic Attorney General Dana Nessel about the policy prior to taking office show “that the state’s new position targets St. Vincent’s religious beliefs,” U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker wrote in his Thursday opinion.

The opinion comes none too soon for St. Vincent, whose contract for adoption services with the state expires on Monday.

Dana Nessel

"One of the reasons we needed urgent relief was because the contract was ending on Monday," said Nick Reaves, a lawyer for the adoption agency. "This ruling basically protects St. Vincent’s and stops the state from taking adverse action, such as not renewing the contract.”

"If they cannot come to an agreement that allows for a quick process of the decommissioning of Line 5 then I will act," Attorney General Dana Nessel said in an interview on the sidelines of the Mackinac Policy Conference. "I'm not prepared to wait much longer on that." (Photo: Clarence Tabb Jr., The Detroit News)

In his opinion, Jonker said Nessel "is at the very heart of the case" in part because of comments she made on the campaign trail in which she described supporters of the state’s prior policy as “hate mongers” and said she “could not justify using the state’s money” to defend “a law whose only purpose is discriminatory animus.”

Shortly after taking office, Nessel agreed to change state policy so contracts with agencies that refused to work with gay couples would be terminated.

"All of this supports a strong inference that St. Vincent was targeted based on its religious belief, and that it was defendant Nessel who targeted it," wrote Jonker, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush.

“Under the attorney general’s current interpretation of Michigan law and the parties’ contracts, St. Vincent must choose between its traditional religious belief, and the privilege of continuing to place children with foster and adoptive parents of all types," Jonker wrote.


Nessel tweeted late Thursday in response to the development: "Now and forever I will fight to support the constitutional precepts of separation of church and state and equal protection under the law for all Michigan residents and all Americans."

The lawsuit filed on behalf of St. Vincent, an adoptive mother and a former foster child revolves around a March settlement between Nessel and the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan regarding two gay couples who had sued the state when they were rejected by agencies with religious objections to same-sex couples. The agencies were St. Vincent and Bethany Christian Services.

The judge's opinion failed to note that some of those comments were made by Nessel in her capacity as a private citizen and others were taken out of context, said Jay Kaplan, a staff attorney for the ACLU of Michigan.

Jonker's decision to issue a preliminary injunction was disappointing and appeared to ignore counter arguments made by the state and the ACLU in amicus briefings, he said.

Adoption agencies essentially become state actors when they contract with the state and allowing them to invoke religious reasons for failing to serve a group of people is akin to a "violation of church and state," he said. The decision essentially "provides a license for discrimination," Kaplan said.

"The ones who lose as a result of this are the children, the children who need these loving, stable homes," Kaplan said.

A spokeswoman for Nessel's office said the department is reviewing the decision. The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services referred comment to the attorney general's office.

The settlement required the state Department of Health and Human Services to maintain non-discriminatory provisions in foster care and adoption agency contracts by ending state contracts with agencies if they discriminate against same-sex couples.

In its April filing, St. Vincent argued the new policy violated the group’s First Amendment rights to free exercise of religion and free speech, the group's 14th Amendment rights to equal protection and those rights guaranteed under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

The agency is represented by a religious liberty group, Becket Law.

The judge's ruling Thursday shows "discriminatory actions taken by the state in this case really have no role in the foster care and adoption context," Reaves said. "And when the state takes these actions, it actually makes it harder to find a home for kids in need.”

The case revolves not around whether same-sex couples can be great parents, Jonker wrote, but around “whether St. Vincent may continue to do this work and still profess and promote the traditional Catholic belief that marriage as ordained by God is for one man and one woman.”

Without state contacts, St. Vincent would be forced to close its doors, the agency argued. Further, other adoption agencies are available to gay couples seeking a child.

As of mid-February, St. Vincent and Bethany were responsible for nearly 10% of the more than 13,000 children under state supervision.

Agencies already can refer couples to different adoption agencies for various reasons, including geography, waitlists or a family's search for a specific type of child. But under the new policy, "the only justification for a referral that is now impermissible is a religious objection to same-sex marriage," the lawsuit said.

In the past, St. Vincent had referred gay couples to other adoption agencies because it believes an evaluation recommending the couples for state licensure “would conflict with (its) religious beliefs.”

The state has investigated St. Vincent for compliance with the new policy but "were waiting for the lawsuit to play out before they take the next step," Reaves said. The rulingfurther prevents the state from acting on the new policy during the duration of the case, he said.

The Legislature in 2015 passed a law that protected faith-based agencies that declined to provide services based on religion. Nessel’s office argued the law applied only to “private action” and not to “state-contracted services.”

Republican former Attorney General Bill Schuette had defended the state against the ACLU lawsuit when it was filed in 2017, but Nessel’s office sought a settlement instead.

The Michigan Catholic Conference, a lead advocate for the 2015 law, praised the judge's Thursday decision, saying: "it's encouraging to see that Dana Nessel's animosity toward Catholics has now been recognized in federal court."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©