Cocktails & Popcorn: Stormy Daniels Has All The Legal Geniuses Suing Each Other's Attorney Client Privileges Away

Go Stormy!

She is a legal dominatrix.

She has all these "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) suing each other over ethical concerns regarding the besmirching of the honorable profession of being an officer of the court of law.

Something tells me the "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) in the military "sex, drugs & dark weapons" scandals is going to be even messier.

Remember David Patreaus?

I do.

He has an email scandal and I bet there are some extremely naughty stuff in his attachments.

Oh, and before I forget, Perkins Coie Sucks.

Stormy Daniels Says Michael Cohen Told Melania Daniels Was a Liar

New lawsuit says the president's lawyer tried to do damage control about alleged affair face-to-face with the First Lady at Mar-a-Lago.

Stormy Daniels’ old attorney plotted with President Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to get her on the Sean Hannity Show and deny her affair with the president, according to a new lawsuit filed Wednesday.

The porn actress is suing Keith Davidson, her former lawyer and peddler of Hollywood dirt and sex tapes, alleging he breached his fiduciary duty by secretly collaborating with Cohen and disclosing information about her legal strategy.

Earlier this year, Daniels became a household name after filing a lawsuit against Cohen and Trump to invalidate a “hush agreement” she signed weeks before the 2016 election. Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 in exchange for her silence on her alleged 2006 romp with Trump, then a real-estate mogul and reality TV star.

Daniels’ legal filings reveal how Davidson, the counselor who inked her non-disclosure agreement, supposedly enjoyed a chummy relationship with Cohen behind the scenes.

Another allegation in the lawsuit: Cohen held a meeting with First Lady Melania Trump at Mar-a-Lago in March to discredit Daniels.

Davidson’s spokesman called the lawsuit “outrageously frivolous” and said it was an attempt by Daniels’ attorney, Michael Avenatti, to distract from negative press about his former law firm, which was slapped with a $10-million bankruptcy settlement.

“That said, Attorney Davidson is very happy that [Avenatti] has filed this lawsuit because [Davidson] strongly believes that the filing constitutes a full and complete waiver of the attorney-client privilege,” said the spokesman, Dave Wedge, in a statement to The Daily Beast.

Wedge appeared to make lemonade out of legal lemons.

“Thankfully, the truth can now finally come out to rebut the false narrative about Attorney Davidson that Mr. Avenatti has been pushing in his more than 175 television appearances and countless other media interviews,” Wedge continued. “Attorney Davidson believes that the American people deserve to know the entire truth—and they soon will. This lawsuit has made that happen.”

Keith Davidson should have been charged after his arrest for extortion not long ago. He is a disgrace to the profession. Watch him now try and distract away from his own unethical conduct. Ms. Daniels deserved better. https://t.co/wd6rfnFCuQ via @thedailybeast

— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) June 6, 2018

For his part, Avenatti said that text messages discussing a potential Hannity interview only bolster his client’s claim of a cover-up.

“These text messages show that the prior denials by Mr. Trump and Mr. Cohen relating to what Mr. Trump knew and about the honesty of my client were absolute lies,” Avenatti said in a statement. “There was a significant cover-up here as part of an attempt to deceive the American people and Mrs. Trump and we intend on getting to the bottom of it.”

In January, Davidson and Cohen tried to do damage control after In Touch magazine ran a steamy interview with Daniels on bedding Trump, according to the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court and first reported by NBC News.

“Call me,” Cohen texted Davidson on Jan. 17, after learning of the scoop. The lawyers—who were supposed to be opposing counsel—“hatched a plan” to get Daniels on Fox News with Sean Hannity to decry the story’s accuracy, the complaint says.

Two hours later, at 2:32 p.m., Cohen messaged Davidson again. “I have her tentatively scheduled for Hannity tonight. Call me after your trial,” Cohen wrote. (Cohen, who’s facing a federal probe over his business dealings and the Daniels NDA, admitted last month that Hannity is one of three recent clients. Another is GOP donor Elliott Broidy.)

Cohen scheduled Daniels—born Stephanie Clifford—to appear on Hannity’s show “only after consultation with Mr. Trump,” the complaint says.

“She cannot don’t [sic] today. She is flying to LA tomorrow. I’m trying to get her to commit for tomorrow,” Davidson replied.

But Cohen, in a panic, sent a cascade of texts to persuade Daniels, “with the assistance of Mr. Hannity, to lie to the American public about her relationship with Mr. Trump via the Fox News broadcast,” her complaint states.

“Can you call me please,” Cohen wrote at 3:25 p.m. He followed up with “Please call me” about 20 minutes later. “Anything?” Cohen added.

“Still trying,” Davidson replied.

“This is no good,” Cohen wrote. “We need her as by doing tomorrow you just create another news cycle instead of putting an end to this one.”

“C’mon!” Cohen desperately texted at 5:01 p.m.

Yet around 5:30 p.m., Cohen changed his tune.

“Let’s forget tonight,” Cohen wrote. “They would rather tomorrow so they can promote the heck out of the show.” According to the lawsuit, “They” refers to Fox News and the Trump administration.

By 8 p.m., Cohen informed Davidson that the porn star’s appearance on Hannity was unnecessary.

“Keith, The wise men all believe the story is dying and don’t think it’s smart for her to do any interviews,” Cohen texted. “Let her do her thing but no interviews at all with anyone.” (In her lawsuit, Daniels says the “wise men” include Trump.)

Davidson agreed, answering, “100%”

“Thanks pal,” Cohen replied. “Just no interviews or statements unless through you.”

“Got it,” Davidson wrote.

These texts show Davidson was set to arrange a media appearance not for Daniels’ benefit but for the benefit of Trump, the lawsuit alleges.

“Indeed, once Mr. Cohen concluded that it was no longer in his own best interest, or those of his client… Mr. Cohen called off the appearance entirely and Mr. Davidson agreed without hesitation,” her lawsuit states.

Davidson wasn’t acting as Daniels’ lawyer; he instead was a “puppet” for Cohen and Trump, the lawsuit says.

In February, Davidson learned Daniels had a new attorney and was about to spill the beans on her affair with Trump, the complaint says. Davidson then allegedly tipped Cohen off about her plans. As a result, Cohen began an arbitration against Daniels on Feb. 27 and sought a temporary restraining order to silence her, the lawsuit alleges.

Davidson allegedly contacted Cohen again in March, alerting him that Daniels was preparing to file a lawsuit to void her “hush agreement.”

Cohen then made efforts to quickly meet with First Lady Melania Trump to “get out in front” of the bombshell suit, “and to convince her that [Daniels] was a liar and not to be trusted,” the complaint says.

The embattled Trump stalwart allegedly met with Melania Trump on March 2 at Mar-a-Lago but stuck with his own narrative. “Cohen did not disclose to Mrs. Trump that not only was [Daniels] far from being a liar, Mr. Cohen had begged her to appear on Mr. Hannity’s show weeks earlier,” the lawsuit says.

The complaint also alleges that Cohen recorded his conversations with Davidson, and that those discussions include sensitive information on Daniels.

Meanwhile, Davidson is accused of withholding Daniels’ entire client file from her and refusing to turn over text messages and correspondence with Cohen.

“Mr. Davidson’s failure to provide the information demanded has prejudiced Ms. Clifford in numerous ways including… hampering her ability to review documents and cooperate with government inquiries regarding Mr. Cohen, Mr. Trump and Mr. Davidson.”

Daniels is seeking damages and fees in excess of $100,000.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

DEFANGO: Wikileaks Vs Q? Deep Dive + Netflix Antifa Pizza Party - s03e12

Defango analyzes the current situations with Wikileaks, Q, Julian Assange, and Antifa in what I call a propaganda challenge to evidentary standards,

In essence, if one can plant a seed through manipulation of the public record, where, in this instance, mysterious, anonymous groups have generated a narrative, to question the credibility of Wikileaks, then the substance of the emails in the Clinton Foundation investigation can be thrown out,

The only problem with this scenario is that the data were preserved years ago and the issue was addressed in House Judiciary, in 2014.

Statement of the Honorable John Conyers, Jr. on H.R. 699, “The Email Privacy Act”

The only problem with this plan, which sounds like the work of "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) is that the investigation is about child welfare, of which Wikileaks has not released, to the public that is, the emails and cables on the trafficking of tiny humans.

Wikileaks Exposes Drugging Kids as Lab Rats

Wikileaks: Children under care of Irish government ended up in brothels

Another issue is this: if the question of a campaign, or perhaps elected and appointed officials, possess knowledge of leaking, or of an operation to interfere in ongoing investigations, such as the email investigation, which started under David Patreaus and has previously been addressed by House Judiciary, then why is this anonymous disinformation campaign not being addressed by FBI?

Would it not be fair to even question if "Q" is a Russian operative, considering this is the direction of its accusations against the credibility through a cyberattack of Wikileaks?

Why is "Qanon" leading anti-establishment Trump voters to embrace regime change and neo-conservatism? https://t.co/iCtWPmnSmO

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) June 26, 2018

Is not "Q" a leaker, if, in fact, it does possess access to confidential, national intelligence, and, if not, why is it, then, allowed to redirect the narrative away from anything dealing with the trafficking of tiny humans, which includes entitites named in Wikileaks material that has and, more than likely, also named in traunches that have yet to be released.

Propaganda campaigns have always started in child welfare, because no one cares.

Enjoy Defango's Deep Dive...."A D3 Production".

The following is an article speaking upon cyberattacks through psychological operations through social media, a much more complex topic when looking through a lens of intellectual property and judicial redress of grievance. 

Qanon: The Path To Dictatorship

Virtually everyone following politics has heard of the #Qanon story. Religiously followed by a growing mass of disciples and vehemently assaulted by a variety of left wing propagandists ranging from Vice to Newsweek, the validity of its claims have sparked a uniquely passionate debate on both sides.  The ones championing its teaching as unquestionable truth range from imageboard dwelling millennials to a considerable number of boomers.  Be it truly the broadcast of insider intel or merely the flagship conspiracy of our time, it’s certainly an exciting read that provides quality entertainment for the end times.

But those faithfully trusting in Q to lead the overthrow of the evil “deep state cabal” and restore American democracy to the people may be missing a much darker purpose for the Qanon posts.  

Used as a highly efficient propaganda tool, Q’s drops may actually be aiding an attempt to dismantle the judiciary altogether.  Should it succeed in pushing this distrust across the public through the oft-cited “Great Awakening, this narrative may actually serve to weaponize Americans into removing the only barrier left to toppling democracy and clearing the way for an Emperor to ascend to the throne. That is, of course, assuming that a coup d’etat has not already taken place.

The basic theme to the Qanon 8chan posts are that Trump and Sessions are frantically working behind the scenes to bring down what we all now know to be a very real and very corrupt deep state shadow government.  The antagonists — corrupt intelligence agency officials, congressmen, and news media plants — did not expect Trump to win and therefore are in “panic mode” over a number of crimes committed over the last eight to twenty years.  These crimes allegedly range from what we’ve seen already (election rigging, dark money, bribes take by elected officials and intelligence agencies) to the far-fetched (mass sex trafficking and pedophilia among elected officials). Some predictions have failed (Hillary Clinton being arrested in October 2017) while others have been eerily prophetic (the pope’s bizarre suggestion of changing the Lord’s prayer).

Perhaps the most compelling narrative is Q’s assertion that high level crime and corruption has been committed within Obama’s Department of Justice and heads of the intelligence agencies, going up to his Chief of Staff Loretta Lynch.  Q compares the systematic dismantling of these “bad actors” to defusing a bomb: the right wires must be cut to disable the mechanism without detonating the entire thing. In this case, the “explosion” of an inadvertent detonation would be the complete collapse of the entire Judicial Branch of America. Q warns that if such an event could occur, all court rulings throughout this period of time could be rendered null and void, and ultimately be challenged according to our current legal channels.

But what if this is the actual plan?

Thanks to the perfect storm of recent disasters ranging from James Clapper’s NSA spying (and perjury upon questioned of it) to former FBI director James  Comey’s destructive letter to Congress about reopening the Clinton email case, Deputy director Andrew McCabe’s contradicting testimony, all of the horrors of the recent IG report, and DOJ’s complete lack of prosecution of any of these crimes, the entire foundation of our intelligence agencies and judicial department is weak and may easily be toppled. The public has lost faith in our judicial department, and has lost faith in all of our intelligence agencies.

Correction: almost all of our intelligence agencies.

There is one agency that remains free of scandal, unearthed corruption, and public distrust: Military Intelligence.  Coincidentally, this is the one place that Trump seems to be comfortably nestled within, protected by its rank and file like the walls of an impenetrable fortress.  Some even speculate that the Qanon postings are an MI counter op that was planned since before Trump took the Oval Office:

According to veteran investigative reporter and best selling author, Dr. Jerome Corsi, he was approached three years ago by a group of generals and told that Donald Trump had been recruited by U.S. military intelligence to run in the 2016 Presidential elections, and subsequently help remove corrupt Deep State officials from positions of power. Corsi claims that QAnon represents the same group of senior military intelligence officials who are exposing the Deep State corruption and officials involved in a history of treasonous actions against the U.S. Republic.

Trump has, from the start of his presidency, surrounded himself by generals and high ranking military personnel.  He has given in to their demands even when in strict opposition to his voter base’s opinion. His spending budget was riddled with Democrat concessions in favor of remarkable military spending. In nearly all of his speeches he’s praised his soldiers and even suggested an American military parade.   This is likely why Q believes Trump is completely untouchable by Mueller’s highly biased quest to ignite a Trump impeachment, as indicated in many of his posts.

It is without question that America’s deep state will go full throttle to attempt to sabotage the Trump presidency before their crimes are unearthed and prosecuted.  We now know that Obama had spies inside Trump’s campaign, had FBI agents offering his colleagues damaging information on Hillary on behalf of Russia, and had baited a “Russian Collusion” setup in the strange event that he would win.  Whether or not Trump actually committed any crimes during his campaign is insignificant: Mueller is going to attempt to set the stage for an impeachment vote, and the media will throw everything they have at the public to get them to consider.  If this fails, they will use all of the media weapons at their disposal to grow a public uprising to try to force Trump out of power while rogue intelligence agents (now removed) will try to sabotage any investigations that may deter this.

But through this gamble, they have inadvertently cleared the path for Trump to garner the public support he needs to overthrow the constitution and seize full authoritarian control of America.  He has already successfully (and thankfully) dismantled the public’s trust of the mainstream media by proving their complete corruption.  This is step two of overthrowing any democracy, with step one being garnering control of the military (which Trump appears to already have done).  To complete the transition, he needs to either attain control of or dismantle the judicial branch.  With the unprecedented Democrat stonewalling on all of his judicial appointees, the former may not be possible. But with the massive failures of all intelligence agencies and the years of DOJ failures to prosecute criminal swamp creatures, there is a growing consensus that our judicial system is broken beyond repair.  Should evidence arrive that the DOJ was compromised; the stage will be set for Trump to conquer.

Qanon’s world is built upon a presumed “great awakening” within public consciousness.  But this awakening might actually be a conditioning: a conditioning of the masses to rally behind Trump’s military order at any cost. And its likelihood of success is very considerable: it is without a doubt that any attempt to remove Trump, no matter what the grounds or the crime, will be met with the full wrath of most of our country.  With at least half of the population firmly behind Trump (unironically the half who is likely to own a firearm), and the power of a strengthened military at his disposal, Trump should be able to seize the throne without much resistance.

It’s possible that Q is just a conspiracy theory, and it’s also possible that it’s real.  But to assume either may underestimate its purpose and its potential.  Q may instead be a sign of the empire to come, and a powerful weapon in crafting its long-overdue reign.  If this is a case, we can look forward to an end of many of the liberal woes we’ve seen over the last 50 years.

Again, the moral of the story is, "Do not be mean to my Sweetie. Period."

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

What Do Michael Flynn, Robert Mueller, Emmett Sullivan & FBI 302s Have In Common? - "Legal Geniuses"

Q: What Do Michael Flynn, Robert Mueller, Emmett Sullivan & FBI 302s Have In Common?

A: "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

Yes, that is correct, Pientka and Strzok are not licensed attorneys, and even if they were, it seems they are functioning in the capacity of  "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) to construct a plausible deniability scenario of blaming everything on Mueller through the generation of false advisement in the form of a 302 to cover thine arses.

Unfortunately, Sullivan ordered the "original redacted 302" to be published  into the historic record to corrupt the annals of history.

Interestingly enough that the 302 was written months after the interview, if I dare say, a violation of FBI protocol of the 48 hour window.

That is fraud upon the court.

That is racketeering.

There is even a line in there where it says that [sic] "Flynn appoints someone to represent the U.S." like he does not know the advice and consent powers of the congress.

That, right there, is how you know you are dealing with "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending).

I bet this is about David Patreaus, his rogue ass crew, and the trafficking of tiny humans, by which I shall opine in the spirit of fuchsia...

BREAKING – Pientka and Strzok Joint FBI Notes Released – Judge Sullivan Orders Mueller Team To File Public Version of Pientka FBI Interview (FD-302)…

On the eve of Michael Flynn's sentencing hearing, judge Emmet Sullivan has ordered Robert Mueller's office to publicly file a redacted version of the original 302 (interview notes) that FBI Agent Joe Pientka prepared after Flynn's Jan. 24, 2017 interview. The FD-302 that is submitted by the Mueller team in response to the Sullivan order is here. Written by FBI Agents Joe Pientka and Peter Strzok:

FUN FACT! JUDGE EMMETT SULLIVAN PRESIDES OVER THE CONYERS v. TRUMP EMOLUMENT CASE

That Congressional Emoluments case has lots of information which will merge quite nicely with the Flynn case, and all the other cases being fast tracked to be enjoined in all those SCOTUS Petitions for Certiorari because they are all the same actors.

Oh, and Mueller knows lots of stuff, too.



The following 302 was generated by "Legal Geniuses" (trademark pending) and used to falsely advise Robert Mueller and the Office of Special Counsel.

How do I know?

FBI 302 of Flynn interview shows agents went out of their way to jog his memory about his statements to Russian ambassador, and he still lied. The lie was material because it prevented investigation from advancing to explaining reason for lie, identifying others who participated.

— Barb McQuade (@BarbMcQuade) December 18, 2018

You can google most of this stuff to check the veracity of the 302.

Besides, the Department of Defense Audit findings are being rolled out through the specific District Courts.

Michael Flynn was everywhere, even Haiti.

He was in Afghanistan.

He knows lots of stuff.

He saw everything.

He knows everyone.

He is a whistleblower.

Wait until we get to Haiti.

This is about Magnitsky Act and the children's trust funds.

Even the media was sourced and we already know how that foreign funded propaganda operation is going, just ask Rachel Maddow. 

But hey, what do I know?

I know this has been put off until March 2019.

Joe Pientka and Peter Strzo... by on Scribd

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©