I shall quickly give my summation, in the spirit of fuchsia.
MCGIRT V. OKLAHOMA;
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE V. MORRISSEY-BERRU ST. JAMES SCHOOL V. BIEL
Consolidated.
This is about Parental Rights.
These people are arguing about pastoral care, you know, those folks on that salvific mission of stealin' the children, land & votes, by taking an oath of fealty to the church, and not the U.S., which means they are beholden to the Vatican, and must do whatever the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops tells them to do, because they run the public policy of their congregations.
Now, allow me to make these arguments so much easier to resolve.
Ok.
First of all, these christian organizations are not for profit office holders, under state laws of incorporation, by which the corporation holds an office to protect the public trust, or rather the posterity of society through children's trust funds.
In order to administratively go after a public, or in this instance, private office holder, where their oath of office, under the laws of the state, as a federalistic arm of the U.S. government, one must first be defrocked, as matters of belief, or, in this instance, religious beliefs, can only be adjudicate in the administrative court of the foreign jurisdiction by which an employee has sworn this oath of fealty to christianity, and not the constitution.
This is when the corporate parents who are the office holders of the children's trust, fall from the heavens to be brought forth in the public square to face the laws of the land.
The easiest way is to terminate the right to the grant to keep and bear the arms of the state to conduct business.
If you are not recognized as being an entity of commerce, for and not for profit, you cannot keep your federal grants because you are a nullified entity, as your 501c status is now illegitimate.
How do you solve those pesky indemnification issues of holding a title when it comes to the determination of ministerial activities in the schools?
Well, the last time I checked, teachers, social workers, pediatricians are licensed, but in charter christian schools, many are not, so how about making them get licensed by the state, so they can hold a public title, where their oath of office is filed in the Great Repository of the State, considering that they get public money to conduct child welfare operations.
That way, you can make the parent corporation, whether it is the fake ass contractual representative arm of the Vatican, USCCB, or any other principality in its chain of command, to also be nullified, because it is all corrupt.
Just like with all elected offices, anyone can easily ask, "By why right do you have to hold office?"
That is call the quo warranto.
You do not have to go through the writ process, all you have to do is file up on their state licensing to engage in commerce.
Commerce is the meeting of the minds in conjugal act of offer and consent,in contract, for this particular situation.
Without consent, there is rule by fear, even though Noahide law will tell you that the ones in power rule the law, which is about the children.
No one cares about the children, because the entire subject falls under chain of Parental Rights, where corporations are salvaging their corporate rights to raise theirgoods children, in accordance to the Public Policy of their Corporate Parent, the Vatican.
The people have the power in a democracy.
If these people want to stand up, again, for the third time, and argue out why they should not be held accountable for trafficking tiny humans, well, by golly geeze, I am just going to have to intervene, because they just defended sexual abuse of children within the walls and practices of their foreign allegiance to the Vatican and the Queen, again....and the U.S. taxpayer funds it all.
TRANSLATION: IF YOU DO NOT TAKE AN OATH TO THE US, THEN TURN AROUND AND TAKE AN OATH TO A FOREIGN NATION STATE WHICH WISHES TO INVADE, YOU NEED TO HAVE ALL RIGHTS TO BEAR ARMS TERMINATED, IMMEDIATELY, BECAUSE YOU SUCK AND TRAFFIC TINY HUMANS.
SECONDARY TRANSLATION: IF YOU ARE ONE OF THE LEGAL GENIUSES DEFENDING THE PRACTICE OF TRAFFICKING TINY HUMANS AND PILFERING THEIR TRUST FUNDS, YOU NEED TO BE TERMINATED OF ALL RIGHTS TO BEAR ARMS OF THE STATES ON WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN CONFERRED THROUGH A SWORN OATH OF OFFICE, TO NOT BREACH THE CHILDREN'S TRUSTS, IN HITHERANCE, BEING STRIPPED OF ALL THAT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE IMMUNITY.
Hey... wait a minute....
Attorney Client Privilege?
Why, that is Brett Kavanaugh!
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE V. MORRISSEY-BERRU ST. JAMES SCHOOL V. BIEL
Consolidated.
This is about Parental Rights.
These people are arguing about pastoral care, you know, those folks on that salvific mission of stealin' the children, land & votes, by taking an oath of fealty to the church, and not the U.S., which means they are beholden to the Vatican, and must do whatever the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops tells them to do, because they run the public policy of their congregations.
Now, allow me to make these arguments so much easier to resolve.
Ok.
First of all, these christian organizations are not for profit office holders, under state laws of incorporation, by which the corporation holds an office to protect the public trust, or rather the posterity of society through children's trust funds.
In order to administratively go after a public, or in this instance, private office holder, where their oath of office, under the laws of the state, as a federalistic arm of the U.S. government, one must first be defrocked, as matters of belief, or, in this instance, religious beliefs, can only be adjudicate in the administrative court of the foreign jurisdiction by which an employee has sworn this oath of fealty to christianity, and not the constitution.
This is when the corporate parents who are the office holders of the children's trust, fall from the heavens to be brought forth in the public square to face the laws of the land.
The easiest way is to terminate the right to the grant to keep and bear the arms of the state to conduct business.
If you are not recognized as being an entity of commerce, for and not for profit, you cannot keep your federal grants because you are a nullified entity, as your 501c status is now illegitimate.
How do you solve those pesky indemnification issues of holding a title when it comes to the determination of ministerial activities in the schools?
Well, the last time I checked, teachers, social workers, pediatricians are licensed, but in charter christian schools, many are not, so how about making them get licensed by the state, so they can hold a public title, where their oath of office is filed in the Great Repository of the State, considering that they get public money to conduct child welfare operations.
That way, you can make the parent corporation, whether it is the fake ass contractual representative arm of the Vatican, USCCB, or any other principality in its chain of command, to also be nullified, because it is all corrupt.
Just like with all elected offices, anyone can easily ask, "By why right do you have to hold office?"
That is call the quo warranto.
You do not have to go through the writ process, all you have to do is file up on their state licensing to engage in commerce.
Commerce is the meeting of the minds in conjugal act of offer and consent,in contract, for this particular situation.
Without consent, there is rule by fear, even though Noahide law will tell you that the ones in power rule the law, which is about the children.
No one cares about the children, because the entire subject falls under chain of Parental Rights, where corporations are salvaging their corporate rights to raise their
The people have the power in a democracy.
If these people want to stand up, again, for the third time, and argue out why they should not be held accountable for trafficking tiny humans, well, by golly geeze, I am just going to have to intervene, because they just defended sexual abuse of children within the walls and practices of their foreign allegiance to the Vatican and the Queen, again....and the U.S. taxpayer funds it all.
TRANSLATION: IF YOU DO NOT TAKE AN OATH TO THE US, THEN TURN AROUND AND TAKE AN OATH TO A FOREIGN NATION STATE WHICH WISHES TO INVADE, YOU NEED TO HAVE ALL RIGHTS TO BEAR ARMS TERMINATED, IMMEDIATELY, BECAUSE YOU SUCK AND TRAFFIC TINY HUMANS.
SECONDARY TRANSLATION: IF YOU ARE ONE OF THE LEGAL GENIUSES DEFENDING THE PRACTICE OF TRAFFICKING TINY HUMANS AND PILFERING THEIR TRUST FUNDS, YOU NEED TO BE TERMINATED OF ALL RIGHTS TO BEAR ARMS OF THE STATES ON WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN CONFERRED THROUGH A SWORN OATH OF OFFICE, TO NOT BREACH THE CHILDREN'S TRUSTS, IN HITHERANCE, BEING STRIPPED OF ALL THAT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE IMMUNITY.
Hey... wait a minute....
Attorney Client Privilege?
Why, that is Brett Kavanaugh!
For some odd reason, the 9th Circuit keeps popping back up.
Hmmmmm......
I will post the briefs and crappy transcripts because this is about the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), not RIFRA
SCOTUS: The Very Second Live Broadcast Of The Very First Time The World Witnesses The Dark Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution On Stealin' The Children, Land & Vote - Termination Of Corporate Parental Rights - Little Sister Of The Poor
The ministerial exception is not limited to the head of a religious congregation. The Court, however, does not adopt a rigid formula for deciding when an employee qualifies as a minister. Here, it is enough to conclude that the exception covers Perich, given all the circumstances of her employment. Hosanna-Tabor held her out as a minister, with a role distinct from that of most of its members. That title represented a significant degree of religious training followed by a formal process of commissioning. Perich also held herself out as a minister by, for example, accepting the formal call to religious service. And her job duties reflected a role in conveying the Church’s message and carrying out its mission: As a source of religious instruction, Perich played an important part in transmitting the Lutheran faith.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment