Yes, that is correct, no one likes a snitch.
Trust me, I should know.
When you are a federal employee and you snitch, they like to do things like cut off your paycheck, snatch your congressional credit union account, wipe out your pension, destroy your work history and tell everyone they know that you are crazy.
Then, if you snitch on what they are doing, like making fake ass law, stealin' children, land & votes, they will do nasty things to your children.
Yippers.
They call actions attacking the whistleblower retaliation, but you can never document retaliation against the whistleblower, if there exists anonymity.
But, if you are a whistleblower, who snitches in the public square, in the public record, on a daily basis, for over 10 years, these federal employees and elected officials, like the members of this committee, will conspire to take out their leader, through foreign sub-contractors, of course.
Just as you will see in Child Protective Services proceedings, you are not allowed to face your anonymous accuser which makes it your word against an undetermined juridic person.
So, in essence, if an anonymous whistleblower is an undetermined juridic person, then, that anonymous whistleblower has no legal standing in a court of law, making any legal proceedings to be devoid of due process.
How can you know the whistleblower is not lying, or just not credible because the Inspector General only becomes the recorder of hearsay, which is not acceptable in a court of law?
Whistleblower laws were designed to cover up fraud.
Period.
It is such a shame that the committee never asked about the definition of the "Whistleblower under Protection on Order of the Highest Authority".
#perkinscoiesucks
Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 by Beverly Tran on Scribd
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_Protection_Act
FBI Whistleblower Protectio... by Beverly Tran on Scribd
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment