Thursday, January 9, 2020

How Is The Catholic Church Hiding More Than $2 Billion In Assets?

St. Alphonsus School, Dearborn
"Wanna buy a Detroit Catholic Church property?"
Q: How is the Catholic Church hiding more than $2 billion in assets?

A:  The Detroit Land Bank Authority - The Archdiocese of Detroit transposable model.

It is way more than $2 billion because they run game in mortgage fraud through Corporate Shape Shifting.

Detroit Archdiocese transfers assets; critics say it's a shell game

Here is the Michigan law:

ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOPS
Act 207 of 1867
AN ACT to authorize the Roman Catholic archbishop of Detroit, Michigan, and the Roman Catholic bishops of Michigan, and their successors in office, and certain other persons, to hold property for the use of benefit of the church; to authorize the borrowing of money; to authorize the execution of contracts and agreements, and the administration of property held by them; and to authorize the exercise of any and all powers relating to the temporalities of the church.
History: 1867, Act 207, Eff. June 27, 1867;Am. 1937, Act 270, Imd. Eff. July 22, 1937;Am. 1954, Act 1, Imd. Eff. Feb. 4, 1954.
The People of the State of Michigan enact:
458.1 Conveyances to Roman Catholic archbishop, bishops, and administrators in trust for religious, educational, or charitable purposes.
Sec. 1. All gifts, grants, deeds, wills and other conveyances, wherein or whereby any lands, tenements or other property within this state have been given, beqeathed, devised or granted, or in any manner conveyed by any person or persons whatever, unto any person or persons, by the name, style or title of Roman Catholic or Catholic bishop of the diocese of Bardstown, Kentucky, and his successors, or to the Roman Catholic bishop
or Catholic bishop of Cincinnati, Ohio, and his successors in office, or to the Roman Catholic or Catholic archbishop of Detroit, or to the Roman Catholic or Catholic bishop of Detroit, or administrator of Detroit, an his successors, or to the Roman Catholic or Catholic bishop of Sault Ste. Marie, or administrator of Sault Ste. Marie, and his successors, or to the Roman Catholic or Catholic bishop of Marquette, or administrator of Marquette, and his successors, or to the Roman Catholic bishop or Catholic bishop of the diocese of Grand Rapids, or administrator of Grand Rapids, and his successors in office, or to any person in his own name as Roman Catholic bishop of the diocese of Grand Rapids, his heirs and assigns, or to the Roman Catholic bishop or Catholic bishop of the diocese of Lansing, or administrator of Lansing, and his successors, or to the Roman Catholic bishop or Catholic bishop of the diocese of Saginaw, or administrator of Saginaw, and his successors, or to the Roman Catholic bishop or Catholic bishop of the diocese of Kalamazoo, or administrator of Kalamazoo, and his successors, or to the Roman Catholic bishop or Catholic bishop of the diocese of
Gaylord, or administrator of Gaylord, and his successors, or to any other person or persons, upon the trust expressed or implied, to take, hold and receive the same for the use and benefit of any religious congregation of Roman Catholics, or for the support, aid and maintenance of any hospital, almshouse, school, seminary, church, parsonage, or for the burial grounds, or other religious, educational or charitable purposes, within this
state; and all such gifts, grants, deeds, wills, devises and bequests and other conveyances which may hereafter be made, shall be sufficient and effectual in law to vest the legal title of, in and to said lands and tenements or other property, in such grantee, donee or devisee, in the present archbishop of the diocese of Detroit, or administrator, and in the present bishops or administrators of the Roman Catholic dioceses within the state of
Michigan, in their respective dioceses, and in the persons who after them may become Roman Catholic archbishop of the diocese of Detroit, and Roman Catholic bishops of said dioceses, and in the successors of said Roman Catholic archbishop and Roman Catholic bishops forever, in trust, for the uses and purposes for
which the said property is or may be hereafter acquired, granted, bequeathed, or devised, and in no other person or persons whatever: Provided, That it shall be necessary in relation to all gifts, grants, deeds, wills and other conveyances heretofore made as aforesaid, that the person or persons to whom the same were made,
or to such persons as they may have conveyed to, if living, shall release their estate or interests therein to the said Roman Catholic archbishop of the diocese of Detroit, and to the said Roman Catholic bishops in the state of Michigan within their respective dioceses: And provided further, That nothing in this act shall be taken or construed to give or grant to the said Roman Catholic archbishop and Roman Catholic bishops, or
administrators of the said dioceses of the state of Michigan, or their successors, the right to hold real estate in trust for any society except for charitable, religious, educational and literary purposes, or for burial grounds,
as provided for by this act.
History: 1867, Act 207, Eff. June 27, 1867;CL 1871, 3124;How. 4727;CL 1897, 8310;CL 1915, 10909;Am. 1927, Act
149, Eff. Sept. 5, 1927;CL 1929, 10845;Am. 1937, Act 270, Imd. Eff. July 22, 1937;Am. 1938, Ex. Sess., Act 4, Imd. Eff. Sept. 8,
1938;CL 1948, 458.1;Am. 1954, Act 1, Imd. Eff. Feb. 4, 1954;Am. 1971, Act 136, Imd. Eff. Sept. 29, 1971.
458.2 Roman Catholic archbishop, bishops or administrators; powers in administering
property.
Sec. 2. The archbishop of the Roman Catholic archdiocese of Detroit and the several bishops of the Roman Catholic dioceses within the state of Michigan and their successors in office, and administrators of the Roman Catholic dioceses within the state of Michigan, for the purpose of administering the property held by them
respectively under this act and in respect thereto, are declared to have and to have had power:
(a) To enter into any and all lawful contracts in respect of the property held by them;
(b) To sue and be sued, complain and defend, in any court, or to be a party to any proceedings before any board, tribunal, commission, or any other public body;
(c) For the purposes of the Roman Catholic church to acquire, purchase, hold, convey, lease, mortgage, and in every way deal in real and personal property of all kinds without limitation; the power to hold real and personal estate shall include the power to take the same by gift, devise or bequest, and upon trusts, either express or implied;
(d) For the purposes of the Roman Catholic church to borrow money and to give promissory notes therefor, and to secure the payment thereof by mortgage or other lien upon real or personal property; to issue, sell or pledge bonds, notes, bills of exchange, debentures and other obligations and evidences of church indebtedness; and to guarantee, purchase, hold, sell, assign or otherwise dispose of the stock, bonds, or
securities of corporations;
(e) To appoint agents and attorneys in fact;
(f) To exercise without limitation of the foregoing, any and all powers relating to the temporalities of the Roman Catholic church vested in such archbishop or bishop or administrator by virtue of his office.
History: Add. 1941, Act 105, Imd. Eff. May 20, 1941;CL 1948, 458.2;Am. 1954, Act 1, Imd. Eff. Feb. 4, 1954
And, here is the archive site of the Archdiocese of Detroit real estate for sale or lease.

https://web.archive.org/web/20190504152218/https://www.aod.org/Our-Archdiocese/Real-Estate/Property-for-Sale-or-Lease/

And, here are the legal filings of Wilmington Trust, on behalf of the Archdiocese, as a creditor of the City of Detroit fake ass Bankruptcy.

And, here is Mooney Real Estate Holdings, LLC, of the Archdiocese of Detroit.

And, here is the real estate agency, CBRE Detroit and its global team.

See, $105.5 billion in global assets is way more than $2 billion in assets.

And, now, you have a more intuitive understanding of why the Celestial Goddess of the Woodshed is an economic, political & social pariah.

Catholic Church Shields $2 Billion in Assets to Limit Abuse Payouts

Dioceses are aggressively moving and reclassifying holdings to shrink the value of their bankruptcy estates.

 Ownership of these churches in the Archdiocese of Santa Fe was transferred to the parishes. As a result, the churches are excluded from the bankruptcy estate available to clergy abuse victims.

For most of the 20th century, the Catholic Church in the U.S. minimized the damage wrought by pedophile priests by covering up the abuse. When the bishop of the Davenport, Iowa, diocese was told in the mid-1950s that one of his priests was sexually abusing boys at a local YMCA, he kept it secret. “It is consoling to know that no general notoriety has arisen, and I pray none may result,” he wrote to a priest, capturing the strategy of the era.

Cover-ups worked when victims and their families could be intimidated or shamed into silence. But in the 1980s and ’90s, victims started filing civil lawsuits against the dioceses where the alleged incidents took place. Church leaders across the country kept these suits quiet by settling out of court and demanding nondisclosure agreements in return. Church leaders paid out about $750 million from the early ’80s through 2002, according to BishopAccountability.org, a nonprofit that tracks clergy sex abuse.


The veil of secrecy on these transactions was pierced when the Boston Globe published its investigations into church sex abuse in 2002, sparking public outrage at how clergy had protected their own. From 1950 to 2002, 4,392 priests were accused of abuse, according to a study by John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

The pace of lawsuits escalated as public awareness grew, and besieged church leaders looked to a new option: bankruptcy. When a church district that’s been sued files for Chapter 11 and then reaches a bankruptcy settlement, a percentage of its assets are divvied up by victims. Like Fortune 500 executives—and more recently the Sacklers, the family that owns OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma LP—church leaders see bankruptcy as an attractive solution because it provides a controlled process for settling a large number of lawsuits while holding on to as many assets as possible.

Another benefit is secrecy. Lawsuits and trials lead to testimony and publicity. Bankruptcy ensures a quieter mass settlement that forces an end to existing lawsuits and blocks new ones. “It provides a clean slate,” says Robert Kugler, a lawyer who represented abuse victims in the St. Paul and Minneapolis archdiocese. Dioceses have gone this route more than 20 times since 2004, when the Archdiocese of Portland, Ore., declared itself insolvent.

relates to Catholic Church Shields $2 Billion in Assets to Limit Abuse Payouts
A statue at Our Lady of Guadalupe in Santa Fe.PHOTOGRAPHER: WILLIAM LEGOULLON FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK
More dioceses are filing for bankruptcy now that rules are changing about how much time a victim has to sue over abuse. Seven states and the District of Columbia passed laws in 2019 that suspend the statute of limitations on civil sex abuse suits, and at least three other states are considering them. Known as “window statutes,” they’ve become popular in the wake of the #MeToo movement and public outcry over abuse by men in power. Until recently, only a half-dozen states had them. Window statutes caused churches to declare bankruptcy in San Diego, Wilmington, Del., and cities throughout Minnesota.

After New York state’s law went into effect in August, almost 430 sex abuse victims immediately filed lawsuits, most of them against dioceses. The diocese of Rochester declared bankruptcy in September; bishops in Brooklyn and Buffalo announced that theirs may soon follow.

In many cases, churches precede bankruptcy by transferring and reclassifying assets. The effect is to shrink the pot of money available to clergy abuse victims. That and Chapter 11’s universal settle­ments and protections from further claims have been an effective one-two punch for limiting payouts. A Bloomberg Businessweek review of court filings by lawyers for churches and victims in the past 15 years shows that the U.S. Catholic Church has shielded more than $2 billion in assets from abuse victims in bankruptcies using these methods. “The survivors should have gotten that money, and they didn’t,” says Terry McKiernan, president of BishopAccountability.org. “The Catholic Church has behaved like a business. It hasn’t behaved like a religion that lives by the rules it espouses.”

relates to Catholic Church Shields $2 Billion in Assets to Limit Abuse Payouts
Ownership of the San Jose cemetery in Albuquerque was transferred to a trust.PHOTOGRAPHER: WILLIAM LEGOULLON FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK
The unfolding of one diocese’s bankruptcy provides a road map for what may come as more go this route. The Chapter 11 filing of the archdiocese in Santa Fe shows how easy and routine it is to rejigger a balance sheet.

The archdiocese was facing a few dozen clergy abuse suits when it filed in December 2018, saying it was too poor to defend itself. The number rose to about 375 by the June 2019 deadline that the bankruptcy court had set for victims to file claims. New Mexico doesn’t have a window statute.

In court papers, the archdiocese reported owning $49 million in real estate, cash, and investments. That figure included its Albuquerque headquarters, corporate and municipal bonds, a half-dozen cars and pickup trucks, and an unspecified amount of gold and silver. By contrast, the church’s 1951 incorporation papers put its estimated value at $40 million, or $396 million in today’s dollars.


To arrive at that $49 million figure, church leaders said at least $178 million in cash and property associated with the archdiocese was owned by parishes or held in a trust or foundation and thus wasn’t eligible for inclusion in the estate. Lawyers for victims, saying there’s no real separation between the archdiocese and its parishes, argue that the $178 million should be included in the available funds. That would raise the value of the estate to as much as $227 million.

The church in Santa Fe began reorganizing in 2012. In November of that year, the business managers for the 90 or so parishes across northern New Mexico gathered in Albuquerque to be addressed by Tony Salgado, chief financial officer for the archdiocese. Salgado had called the meeting to explain to the managers how to incorporate their parishes separate from the archdiocese. “We got step-by-step instructions,” says Christine Romero, then the business manager for St. Anne parish in Santa Fe. The legal change would let the archdiocese assert that each parish was a distinct organization that owned its own property. Around the same time, records show, church leaders created the Archdiocese of Santa Fe Real Estate Corp. and began transferring hundreds of properties into it.

Romero says that when she raised her hand and asked how the separate incorporations would affect the parishes, Salgado said the move wouldn’t change day-to-day operations. “It’s just to protect us from the pedophile lawsuits,” he said, according to Romero. Salgado declined to comment.

Incorporating parishes separately allowed the archdiocese to take about $91 million off its books. The first $34 million came from moving 120 properties in Santa Fe, Taos, and other areas into a trust it says it holds on behalf of its parishes. The properties include churches, cemeteries, and a building with a cafe and a yoga studio. (The real value of the properties is likely much higher: The archdiocese assigned a value of zero for many of them, and for others it used the assessed value the local authorities assign for tax purposes instead of the appraised value, or what the property could be expected to command in a sale.) Another $57 million worth of property owned by the parishes, including cemeteries in Santa Fe and a mobile home in Taos where a priest lives, is held in a separate trust.

relates to Catholic Church Shields $2 Billion in Assets to Limit Abuse Payouts
A Santa Fe church property housing a yoga studio and other businesses.PHOTOGRAPHER: WILLIAM LEGOULLON FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK
James Stang, lead lawyer for the alleged clergy abuse victims in the bankruptcy, wrote in a June court filing that the incorporations and transfers were made with the intent to “hinder, delay, or defraud” the claimants. J. Ford Elsaesser, an archdiocese lawyer, disputes accusations that the archdiocese shuffled assets to keep money from claimants. The relationship between the church and its parishes is like that between an adult child and an elderly parent who can no longer handle his affairs, he says: “The property is yours in name, but it’s not your money.” He says that bankruptcy is the best venue for settling large numbers of abuse claims in part because it makes for a fairer distribution of finite church assets, with all victims sharing the money in an orderly way instead of it being quickly scooped up by victims who file claims first.

Church officials also put close to $37 million in cash and investments into a Wells Fargo account that it says it controls but doesn’t own. Yet another pot of funds sits in the Catholic Foundation, which accepts donations to the archdiocese. The foundation has almost $50 million and dispersed about $1.8 million in 2019 to Catholic causes, including the training of new priests and the retirement of older ones. Church lawyers say the foundation is not part of the bankruptcy estate.


But victims’ lawyers say the foundation is listed as a “subordinate organization” of the archdiocese with the Internal Revenue Service, a designation it needs to be exempt from federal taxes, and its holdings should be included in the estate. “Let’s be very clear what this foundation is,” Stang said at an August hearing. “It’s the fundraising arm of the archdiocese.”

Incorporation documents for four parishes Businessweek reviewed show that the archdiocese has kept tight control. Salgado is listed as the point of contact for the parishes, and half of the board of directors for some parishes are listed as archdiocese staff. The articles of incorporation for each parish, which lay out corporate and tax information, can’t be changed without the arch­bishop’s approval.

Parishes continue to pay 12.5% of their Sunday collection plates to the archdiocese, according to a 2018 deposition from Father John Daniel, who at the time worked in archdiocese administration. Parish payments provided the vast majority of the archdiocese’s $6 million annual income, with the payments checked by auditors who report to Salgado, according to the deposition, which was taken as part of a sex abuse suit prior to the bankruptcy.

relates to Catholic Church Shields $2 Billion in Assets to Limit Abuse Payouts
A roadside cross in Española.PHOTOGRAPHER: WILLIAM LEGOULLON FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK
The largest bankruptcy settlement from an archdiocese came in the Chapter 11 filing of St. Paul and Minneapolis. The smallest was in Milwaukee.

When the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis filed for bankruptcy in 2015, it said it didn’t own the parishes, the schools, or the 10 cemeteries within its territory. “They took a paintbrush and went to every cemetery and painted over the name ‘Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis,’ ” Jeff Anderson, a lawyer who represented abuse victims in that bankruptcy, said in a news conference at the time. Church leaders, claiming they’d fully disclosed all assets and cooperated with the bankruptcy court, said the archdiocese owned assets worth less than $50 million; lawyers for victims said the number was closer to $1.7 billion. The court never reached a consensus, but about 450 people got a total of $210 million—an average of about $467,000 each. Some of it came from church assets and some from insurance.

In Milwaukee, then-Archbishop Timothy Dolan sent a letter to the Vatican in 2007 asking for permission to shift almost $57 million into a trust fund earmarked for maintaining cemeteries. The letter appeared to acknowledge that the purpose of the move was to shield the assets. “By transferring these assets to the Trust, I foresee an approved protection from any legal claim and liability,” Dolan wrote. The Vatican approved the transfer, levying a tax of $100 for itself without explaining why. When Milwaukee’s church leaders declared bankruptcy four years later—Dolan was by then cardinal of New York—they claimed assets of $10 million to $50 million. Victims’ lawyers didn’t make their own estimate, but they fought successfully to include the cemetery trust in the estate’s assets. After a nearly five-year fight in which the Milwaukee archdiocese tried to get virtually all of the claims dismissed by a judge, about 350 victims got an average of $60,000 each.

relates to Catholic Church Shields $2 Billion in Assets to Limit Abuse Payouts
Parishes continue to pay 12.5% of their Sunday collection plates to the archdiocese, according to a 2018 deposition.PHOTOGRAPHER: WILLIAM LEGOULLON FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK
As a very rough guide, an archdiocese in bankruptcy will settle with clergy abuse victims for roughly half the value of its estate. If the Santa Fe archdiocese settles for half the value of the $49 million it says it owns, the 375 victims will each get roughly $65,000, about one-fifth of the $300,000 they would get if the arch­diocese hadn’t taken $176 million off its ledger.

The difference matters. Victims of childhood sexual abuse face increased mental and physical health problems and lower lifetime earnings. The cost to a victim can be more than $280,000 over a lifetime, according to a 2018 study by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. (The school is supported by Michael Bloomberg, founder and majority owner of Bloomberg LP, the owner of Businessweek.)

High rates of poverty and devout obedience to local priests left some New Mexico children particularly vulnerable. Mary, who asked that her full name not be used to protect her privacy, lives in Las Vegas, N.M. She says she was raped by Sabine Griego, a priest at Our Lady of Sorrows when she was 10. Griego pleaded not guilty to eight counts of child sex abuse and has a jury trial scheduled for June. The archdiocese has settled with at least 30 people who said he abused them as children, according to the Albuquerque Journal. Mary isn’t among them, but she’s listed as a creditor in the bankruptcy. The public defender representing Griego says the priest maintains his innocence.

The area around Our Lady is poor, with ramshackle trailers and yards full of junked cars, shopping carts, and firewood. Now 51, Mary lives not far from Our Lady in a home with a tall fence, a surveillance camera, and three pit bulls. “I’ll probably be seeing a therapist for the rest of my life,” she says. “What amount of money is going to give me my life back?”

Isaac Casados, another creditor, grew up in the small town of Española wanting to be a priest. Casados says that when he was a 10-year-old altar boy, fresh off his first communion at Holy Cross Catholic Church, Father Marvin Archuleta molested him. Archuleta was charged in February with raping a first-grade boy at Holy Cross in the mid-’80s; a jury trial is slated to begin in January. His lawyer denies that allegation and those of Casados.

Living now in Santa Fe, where he owns a small medical technology company, Casados, 38, suffered in the decade after he was abused from alcoholism and depression. He says he attempted suicide. “Money would have helped me find the resources to rectify the internal issues I was dealing with,” he says. After decades of listening to sermons about responsibility and honesty, he views the archdiocese’s financial restructuring as hypocritical. “They teach us not to lie,” he says. “Why are they willing to lie about their assets?”


Multiple victims’ lawyers say the Vatican guides the dioceses in both their financial reorganization and their positions regarding settlements. “All financial decisions, all strategic decisions, all decisions are made by the Vatican,” says Anderson, who’s represented clergy sex abuse victims for 37 years. “I’m in constant communication with lawyers who represent churches, and I know they are in touch with the Vatican.” John Manly, a lawyer who’s represented victims in 15 church bankruptcies, says he’s been in settlement negotiations in which bishops have told him they’re in touch with the Holy See. “I’ve had bishops say, ‘I can’t do this without Vatican permission,’ ” Manly says.

In late December, in a nod toward greater transparency, Pope Francis abolished the “pontifical secrecy” rule, which church officials had used to withhold information about sexual abuse from civil authorities. The Vatican didn’t respond to a request for comment for this story. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops wrote in response to questions, “A decision on whether to seek Chapter 11 protection in a given case is the diocese’s alone.”

The Archdiocese of Santa Fe and victims’ lawyers started court-ordered mediation in September. Every church bankruptcy so far has ended in a settlement, but the aggressiveness of the archdiocese’s asset shielding has increased the possibility that there won’t be one this time.

At a court hearing in early December, the federal judge overseeing the case asked Stang if he was satisfied with how the mediation was going. The lawyer would only say he was committed to attending the next session, which is scheduled for early February. “A solution at present still appears elusive, and progress is slow,” the mediator wrote in a December progress report. Church leaders and lawyers across the country are watching the negotiations for guidance on how to approach their own potential bankruptcies.

If the archdiocese refuses to budge on its asset pool, then victims could refuse to settle, says Paul Linnenburger, another lawyer who represents clergy abuse victims. If that happens, there’s a risk for the archdiocese that the judge could lift the shield protecting it from lawsuits. That would open it up to trials and the possibility of enormous jury awards. Other possible scenarios include the archdiocese dragging out the fight until exhausted victims agree to a low settlement, as they did in Milwaukee, or the judge assigning an outside financial expert to untangle the archdiocese’s accounting and pressuring church leaders into a more generous settle­ment, as happened in San Diego.

relates to Catholic Church Shields $2 Billion in Assets to Limit Abuse Payouts
A display of crosses in Chimayo outside Española.PHOTOGRAPHER: WILLIAM LEGOULLON FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK
However the fight in New Mexico concludes, nobody can bring new cases against the archdiocese for clergy abuse that happened before the bankruptcy. Many victims didn’t come forward in time to make the June deadline, say victims’ lawyers. “That will leave out a significant portion of people who are still too ashamed, too wounded, too fearful to come forward,” says Robert Weisz, a Santa Fe psychologist who’s treated clergy abuse victims for 15 years.

That doesn’t mean the archdiocese will necessarily be done with the issue. Hector Balderas, New Mexico’s attorney general, is disturbed about the arch­diocese’s history of paying off victims and making them sign nondisclosure agreements to stay silent. In late 2018 his office demanded personnel and financial records related to clergy abuse, and his agents served search warrants at archdiocese headquarters. The investigation is ongoing, and Elsaesser says the archdiocese is cooperating.

One focus of the probe is whether church leaders paid off individuals to preserve their ability to raise money, Balderas says. He’s disturbed by church leaders who may have prioritized the wealth of the archdiocese over making victims whole. “The bankruptcy code should not be used to revictimize victims,” says Balderas, himself a former altar boy. “They are really just trying to shield assets.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

3 comments:

BEVERLY TRAN said...

I bet Allen Vigneron and Rob McCann are praying for me to just be spirited away in silence by a thief in the night...

BEVERLY TRAN said...

I found the bylaws of the Detroit Land Bank Authority!

Public Private Partnerships furthering the most compelling interests of the highest authority👉 Parental Rights.

Romans XIII

Submission to Governing Authorities
13 Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities,(A) for there is no authority except that which God has established.(B) The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2 Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted,(C) and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3 For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended.(D) 4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.(E) 5 Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.(F)

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%2013&version=NIV

BEVERLY TRAN said...

God establish but forgot to incorporated which means it has no grant of God to exist.

Nullified entity.

#sealsmatter