This is a red carpet roll out of the pharmaceutical industry taking over the cannabis industry through Medicaid expansions.
I keep hearing the new fraud scheme lingo of reparations buzzwords, "black & brown" which automatically demonstrates that this is soft disclosure of more Public Private Partnerships of foreign corporations implementing new socioeconomic programs to take over the entire justice system, under corporate parental rights with their Social Impact Bonds for complete asset forfeiture for their civil debt.
Behold! Corporate Parental Rights has re-engineered itself in the form of the STATES Act.
How do I know this is another push for privatization of the U.S.?
Well, it all started in child welfare because no one cares and I am the original source.
This is how you start to lay the groundwork to amend the U.S. Constitution, but hey, what do I know?
I know we are watching a #coloredrevolution because I hear them talking about the business industries licensing, profit margins and taxes as commerce.
The STATES Act will expose flawed marijuana legacy
Introduced in Senate (06/07/2018)
115th CONGRESS
2d Session |
S. 302
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for a new rule regarding the application of the Act to marihuana, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
June 7, 2018
Ms. Warren (for herself, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Paul, Ms. Cortez Masto, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Booker, Mr. Sullivan, and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for a new rule regarding the application of the Act to marihuana, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
This Act may be cited as the “Strengthening the Tenth Amendment Through Entrusting States Act” or the “STATES Act” .
(a) In General.—Part G of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“RULE REGARDING APPLICATION TO MARIHUANA
“Sec. 710. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the provisions of this title as applied to marihuana, other than the provisions described in subsection (c) and other than as provided in subsection (d), shall not apply to any person acting in compliance with State law relating to the manufacture, production, possession, distribution, dispensation, administration, or delivery of marihuana.
“(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the provisions of this title related to marihuana, other than the provisions described in subsection (c) and other than as provided in subsection (d), shall not apply to any person acting in compliance with the law of a Federally recognized Indian tribe within its jurisdiction in Indian Country, as defined in section 1151 of title 18, United States Code, related to the manufacture, production, possession, distribution, dispensation, administration, or delivery of marihuana so long as such jurisdiction is located within a state that permits, respectively, manufacture, production, possession, distribution, dispensation, administration, or delivery of marihuana.
“(1) section 401(a)(1), with respect to a violation of section 409 or 418;
“(2) section 409;
“(3) section 417; and
“(4) section 418.
“(1) violates the Controlled Substances Act with respect to any other controlled substance;
“(2) notwithstanding compliance with State or tribal law, knowingly or intentionally manufactures, produces, possesses, distributes, dispenses, administers, or delivers any other marihuana in violation of the laws of the State or tribe in which such manufacture, production, possession, distribution, dispensation, administration, or delivery occurs; or
“(3) employs or hires any person under 18 years of age to manufacture, produce, distribute, dispense, administer, or deliver marihuana.”.
(b) Definition Of Marihuana.—Section 102(16) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(16)) is amended—
(1) by striking “or the sterilized” and inserting “the sterilized”; and
(2) by striking the period at the end and inserting “, or industrial hemp (as defined in section 7606(b) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 5940(b))).”.
Section 409 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 849) is amended—
(A) by striking “A person” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (d), a person”; and
(B) by striking “subsection (b)” and inserting “subsection (c)”;
(A) by striking “A person” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (d), a person”; and
(B) by striking “subsection (a)” and inserting “subsection (b)”; and
“(d) Exception.—Subsections (b) and (c) shall not apply to any person who possesses, or possesses with intent to distribute marihuana in compliance with section 710.”.
Section 418 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 859) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), in the first sentence, by inserting “and subsection (c) of this section” after “section 419”;
(2) in subsection (b), in the first sentence, by inserting “and subsection(c) of this section” after “section 419”; and
“(c) Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to any person at least 18 years of age who distributes medicinal marihuana to a person under 21 years of age in compliance with section 710.”.
(1) shall not be unlawful;
(2) shall not constitute trafficking in a controlled substance under section 401 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841) or any other provision of law; and
(3) shall not constitute the basis for forfeiture of property under section 511 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 881) or section 981 of title 18, United States Code.
(b) Proceeds.—The proceeds from any transaction in compliance with this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall not be deemed to be the proceeds of an unlawful transaction under section 1956 or 1957 of title 18, United States Code, or any other provision of law.
If you go after the public corruption, you would not have injustice.
How come House Judiciary will not hold any hearings on public corruption?
Well, it would be difficult to hold hearings when you are the subject of the hearings.
Awkward!
Her Flatulent Boviness, Sheila Jackson Lee, had to raise the question about the commercial opportunities for child welfare programs.
Then, they discussed all the problems with Florida, drug testing and barriers with banks when this popped up.
DOJ: The Power Of Child Welfare Propaganda & Urine - Another $57 Million Medicaid Fraud In Child Welfare Op Busted
No one talked about foreign corporations investing fraud schemes in the U.S. marijuana industry but they are surely talking about investment capitol, asset management and targeted populations, code for Social Impact Bonds.
Hakeem Jeffries got real and took it all the way back as a residual of the peculiar institution.
Lieu raised how no one is talking about human trafficking, public corruption or election fraud, after foster care popped up in discussions.
Hakeem Jeffries got real and took it all the way back as a residual of the peculiar institution.
Lieu raised how no one is talking about human trafficking, public corruption or election fraud, after foster care popped up in discussions.
-----------------------------------------------
Witnesses
Marilyn Mosby Esq.
State's Attorney for Baltimore City, Baltimore, MD
State's Attorney for Baltimore City, Baltimore, MD
Dr. G. Malik Burnett MD, MBA, MPH
COO, Tribe Companies, LLC, Washington, DC
COO, Tribe Companies, LLC, Washington, DC
Mr. Neal Levine
Chief Executive Officer, Cannabis Trade Federation, Denver, CO
Chief Executive Officer, Cannabis Trade Federation, Denver, CO
Dr. David L. Nathan MD, DFAPA
Doctors for Cannabis Regulation, Princeton, NJ
Doctors for Cannabis Regulation, Princeton, NJ
Documents
116th Congress
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment