SENATE JUDICIARY: To Document Or Not To Document - That Is The Census Trafficking Tiny Humans Global Expansion Question

Grassley is calling out re-cycling of children at the border.

These agencies like Bethany Christian and Samaritas, get big money in re-cycling.

We need a cyberwall like the Vatican has.

Diane Feinstein is upset about border children being snatched from parents, where the children are put in state custody, sleeping on floors, dirty, hungry, but not once did she ask about foster care and adoption, where the same thing has been going on since we founded this great nation.

Priorities.

These people want to start issuing the latest and greatest Social Impact Bond..Baby Bonds.

Who said databases do not exist to be sold?

Foreign entities tried crowdsourcing to construct para-military instillations.

There are tens of thousands of chattel being ranched in the antiquated DHS human containment system.

But, however shall congress fix the border?

Have no fear, the christians are here!

Happy Residuals Of The Peculiar Institution Month! - Bethany Christian Joins Up With UNICEF To Re-Engineer The African Slave Trade - The Children's Christian Crusade For More Orphanages

In honor of Juneteenth, the U.S. celebrates, well, not really because the majority of Americans have no idea of what it means, the emancipation of slaves with the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation.

According to Wikipedia:

Juneteenth, also known as Juneteenth Independence Day or Freedom Day, is an American holiday that commemorates the June 19, 1865, announcement of the abolition of slavery in the U.S. state of Texas, and more generally the emancipation of enslaved African Americans throughout the former Confederate States of America. Its name is a portmanteau of "June" and "nineteenth", the date of its celebration.[1][2] Juneteenth is recognized as a state holiday or special day of observance in 45 states.[3]

But slavery was never abolished because of the Exception Clause, or rather the word "except".


We need a more sustainable solution to the global orphan crisis

A toddler orphaned in the recent earthquake props himself against a
couch as he practices walking, inside one of several dozen homes for orphans
at SOS Children's Village, outside Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Wednesday, April 14, 2010.

I understand why people think orphanages effectively address the global orphan crisis. According to UNICEF, there are around 140 million orphans currently in the world. And orphanages can provide a place where children are safe with basic needs met. They have toys, clothing and shelter. They go to school. They sometimes have a swing set.

This is from the reference to UNICEF:

In keeping with this and the agency’s commitment to adapt to the evolving realities of the AIDS crisis, UNICEF commissioned an analysis of population household surveys across 36 countries. Designed to compare current conditions of orphans and non-orphans, the global analysis suggests we should further expand our scope, focusing less on the concept of orphanhood and more on a range of factors that render children vulnerable. These factors include the family's ownership of property, the poverty level of the household, the child’s relationship to the head of the household, and the education level of the child’s parents, if they are living. In UNICEF’s experience, these are the elements that can help identify both children and their families – whether this term includes living parents, grandparents or other relatives – who have the greatest need for our support.

Orphanages allow loving, well-intentioned people to see the direct results of their donations and their work in a tangible way. But are they what’s really best for children? Decades of research tells us no.  It’s time to change how we respond to the Global Orphan Crisis. First, we need to understand that in many ways it’s not an orphan crisis, but an “orphanage” crisis, and in order to usher in real change, we must start to visualize a solution that doesn’t have four sturdy walls:

Families.

Forced migration.

Human trafficking.

Orphanages, however loving and compassionate the staff, founders and surrounding community, are not adequate substitutes for real families. Studies have shown that institutional care – like orphanages - affects the way a child’s brain develops, causing dramatic developmental delays and even stunts physical growth; institutionalized children average 1.0–1.5 standard deviations below the mean for parent-reared children with respect to physical growth and behavioral and mental development. In fact, decades of research have shown us how children’s brains develop differently when affected by abuse and neglect. This changes how children form relationships and limits their ability to attach to others.

Orphanages are human plantations, warehouses of god, complete with a recordkeeping database of legacies, created by christian missionaries to "Salvage the Souls" by "Saving the Savages" by indoctrinating the society to the socioeconomic system of the tax exempt god.

If parents are humans, where humans are carbon. and climate change is about reducing carbon, would that then be one reason behind the need for more orphanages?

Then, there is the logistical issue of a few workers caring for many children. Young children are hardwired to need more than just food and water—they need attention and touch and positive affirmation from a consistent and present role model. Even the most good-hearted orphanage employees cannot possibly fulfill these emotional needs to a large group of children in a truly satisfactory manner. Groups of well-intentioned youth groups and church volunteers can also not meet these needs for children.  Everything about growing up in an orphanage has life-altering consequences.

There are opportunities, already laid out in this World Bank video.

Think about your own family. If something awful were to happen, you wouldn’t want your child would go to an orphanage. Not even one with toys, a school and a swing set.

Parents in the United States often make arrangements for their children to live with relatives should anything unexpected happen, and when that’s not an option, we rely on foster care. By the 1950s, more children lived in foster homes than in orphanages in the United States. Today, U.S. orphanages have largely disappeared with foster care taking their place.

According to UNICEF data, an estimated 90 percent of “orphaned” children around the world actually have at least one living parent. Some parents surrender children to an orphanage because an extenuating circumstance – poverty, illness, regional violence, war or displacement – leads them to that point. If my child is in an orphanage, they think, at least they’ll eat. At least they’ll have a chance to go to school. At least they’ll have a chance at life.

For parents facing desperate options, poverty, the orphanage down the road that promises food and education becomes a good option and surrendering that child is the loving choice. They see it as the best option – or, often, their only option – for their child’s survival or education.

Poverty should never be a reason to place a child in an orphanage but it is andthere is nothing anyone can do about it – orphanages were never made to meet this need. They were once necessary in the midst of large-scale crises, like the HIV/AIDS crisis, that took the lives of entire villages. But now, orphanages should be a last resort, because there is a better way: Family-centered, individualized care.

Foster care that has been contextualized to function effectively in developing countries should be the alternative to orphanages. It’s time to change our understanding of orphanages to reflect the fact that most of the children in them are not actually orphaned.  The majority of children in orphanages worldwide have one or two living parents. Family preservation and family strengthening programs, like temporary foster care, should replace orphanages and be offered to help assist parents thrive and remain together with their children.

No. It is human trafficking. 

Stealin'.

Christians who feel strongly the biblical call to care for the widow and orphan, and who have led the missions work to build orphanages in the past, are uniquely qualified to lead a movement of change within the Western Church.  It is time to stand against orphanage-based care and instead support local, community-based foster care around the world. Foster care was the right decision in the U.S. in the early 1900s and it’s the right decision now on a Global stage.

Of the past????

Girlfriend. That is called the residuals of the peculiar institution.

Like human trafficking?

But the Global effort must foremostly empower the local leaders and social work professionals to lead the change in their own communities. At Bethany, our goal with sharing a foster care blueprint is always to make sure our presence is temporary and that we ultimately are able to step away and let local governments and community-based organizations take the reins. This ensures quality family-based care and support services are sustainable and tailored to every community’s particular needs.

Do your understand you are promulgating human trafficking?  No, seriously, you actually published this into the public record. You need to re-read this, with your eyes closed, and think of yourself as a parent who has had their child snatched from their arms, based upon an anonymous call.

A family setting best supports a child’s spiritual, physical, psychological, social, and emotional needs. I urge Christians, churches and global outreach organizations across the U.S. during this National Foster Care Month to help us in this movement to support families, reunify children in orphanages with their families and establish foster care systems around the world, because every child is made in the image of God, and each of them matters.

Fuck you.

#Time2AuditGod

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©