The Senate Judiciary debated the nomination of Bill Barr today.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?457881-1/us-senate-debates-william-barr-attorney-general-nomination
https://www.c-span.org/video/?457881-1/us-senate-debates-william-barr-attorney-general-nomination
Richard Blumenthal was hot on his Emolument case by reading into the record that Barr noted that he did not even look up the term before the hearing.
Seriously?
That is Blumenthal's legacy because he entered it with Conyers, but, of course, if you look at like I do, if Barr ever made any acknowledgment that the case is at the threshold of SCOTUS, he would have to say Conyers' name....which would mean he would have to venture into the unsavory the world of #MeToo psyoptic...and due process questions....you know...awkward.
Blumenthal dropped "The Imperial Presidency" and voting rights in the Ohio situation, another subtle reference to the Conyers legacy, but, hey, what do I know?
I know he was hot and heavy in voicing his concerns about the veracity of the Mueller Report, on whether or not Barr would, oh, how shall we say this, edit, the final report.
I also know there may just be one of those legal ace up the sleeve when it comes to circumventing release of the contents of the report, in the event it is edited, like...um....testimony of the original sources, into the public record, under perjury of law, in congress....or in a civil action.
That would be fun!
Chuck Grassley was reading into the record the contracutual "meeting of the minds" to the foundaiton of the investigation model that is about to be revealed, by enumerating the events of the process of the social contract between Barr and the people, per his testimony.
Chuch Grassley is hard core on his legacy of the False Claims Act, that I prefer to rename it, with a bit of tweeking, the ending of Medicaid fraud in child welfare pillar, the residuals of the peculiar institution, by allowing the original sources to bear witness to let justice be done though the heavens fall.
Alas, with all these aforementioned, looming, historic questions of the existence of a civil society, on the cusp of a constitution crisis, Jolly Jerry Nadler decides to chastise the soon to be relieved of his duties of office under the Administrative Vacancies Act, Acting Attorney General, Matt Whitaker, all because the pretty people in the big rectangle big screen HDTV on the wall said lied.
Yup.
Priorities.
Seriously?
That is Blumenthal's legacy because he entered it with Conyers, but, of course, if you look at like I do, if Barr ever made any acknowledgment that the case is at the threshold of SCOTUS, he would have to say Conyers' name....which would mean he would have to venture into the unsavory the world of #MeToo psyoptic...and due process questions....you know...awkward.
Blumenthal dropped "The Imperial Presidency" and voting rights in the Ohio situation, another subtle reference to the Conyers legacy, but, hey, what do I know?
I know he was hot and heavy in voicing his concerns about the veracity of the Mueller Report, on whether or not Barr would, oh, how shall we say this, edit, the final report.
I also know there may just be one of those legal ace up the sleeve when it comes to circumventing release of the contents of the report, in the event it is edited, like...um....testimony of the original sources, into the public record, under perjury of law, in congress....or in a civil action.
That would be fun!
Chuck Grassley was reading into the record the contracutual "meeting of the minds" to the foundaiton of the investigation model that is about to be revealed, by enumerating the events of the process of the social contract between Barr and the people, per his testimony.
Chuch Grassley is hard core on his legacy of the False Claims Act, that I prefer to rename it, with a bit of tweeking, the ending of Medicaid fraud in child welfare pillar, the residuals of the peculiar institution, by allowing the original sources to bear witness to let justice be done though the heavens fall.
Alas, with all these aforementioned, looming, historic questions of the existence of a civil society, on the cusp of a constitution crisis, Jolly Jerry Nadler decides to chastise the soon to be relieved of his duties of office under the Administrative Vacancies Act, Acting Attorney General, Matt Whitaker, all because the pretty people in the big rectangle big screen HDTV on the wall said lied.
Yup.
Priorities.
Washington, D.C. – Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) sent a letter, below, to Acting Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker, requesting that he clarify statements he made during his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on February 8, 2019.
U.S. House Judiciary Chairm... by on Scribd
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©
No comments:
Post a Comment